DOCSLIB.ORG

The Close Front Vowels of Northern Standard Dutch, Southern Standard Dutch and Afrikaans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Close Front Vowels of Northern Standard Dutch, Southern Standard Dutch and Afrikaans University of Ghent Faculty of Arts and Philosophy 2013 - 2014 The close front vowels of Northern Standard Dutch, Southern Standard Dutch and Afrikaans A descriptive, comparative and methodological inquiry Master thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Advanced Studies in Linguistics: Linguistics in a Comparative Perspective Mathijs Debaene Supervisor: prof. dr. Jacques Van Keymeulen Co-supervisor: prof. dr. Ellen Simon Acknowledgements “I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.” As much as I love Douglas Adams, I am quite relieved, to say the least, that this particular quote of his only applied to the first submission date for my Master’s thesis, and that the second deadline did not even begin to dare peer its ominous face at hopelessness’ horizon. I must admit that I may have made an error of judgment, and that I gravely underestimated the man-hours needed to manually compile and statistically process a data set the size of a baby rhinoceros like the one used in the present study. This confession being made, a number of people deserve a proper ‘shout-out’ for their contribution to this Master’s thesis, without whom it would have been impossible – or at least extremely difficult – to have successfully completed this endeavor. First and foremost, shout-out to my primary supervisor, professor Jacques Van Keymeulen, who can claim credit for pitching the idea of comparing Afrikaans with Northern and Southern varieties of Dutch. I duly appreciate the great degree of freedom (no statistical pun intended) with which you have let me conduct my research. Perhaps this is not the study that you initially had in mind when first talking to me about the subject, but I sincerely hope that you can still value the final result. Shout-out to my long-time supervisor and now co-supervisor professor Ellen Simon as well, without whose theoretical insights in phonetics and practical tips regarding audio recordings, formant measurements and data processing the present study would have looked much bleaker and less solid. Furthermore, shout-out to my mother and father; their tough love was very welcome, their occasional ‘call to arms’ much needed, and, most of all, their relentless support more than heart-warming; shout-out to my brother too – I keep the long nights filled with shenanigans in a little heart-shaped necklace in the part of my brain used for memory storage; shout-out, finally, to Nick, Arno and Anneleen as well. The people inhabiting the present paragraph have helped me to keep going when times got tough, to use a cliché in which a truth deeper than many may suspect nevertheless lays hidden. Table of contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 5 2 Previous research ............................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Dutch and Afrikaans: acoustic vowel research ................................................................... 9 2.1.1 NSD and SSD ................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3 NSD and SSD contrasted ................................................................................................. 13 2.1.3 Afrikaans ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Dutch and Afrikaans: phonetic comparisons ................................................................... 17 2.3 Phonetic vowel roundedness and derounding research .................................................. 20 2.3.1 Roundedness and derounding in Dutch and Afrikaans ..................................................... 20 2.3.2 Methodological approaches to roundedness and derounding ........................................... 22 3 Vowels in contrast ............................................................................................................26 3.1 Northern Standard Dutch ................................................................................................. 26 3.1.1 /i - y/ ........................................................................................................................... 26 3.1.2 /ɪ - ʏ/ and /ə/ ............................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Southern Standard Dutch ................................................................................................. 28 3.2.1 /i - y/ ........................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.2 /ɪ - ʏ/ and /ə/ ............................................................................................................... 28 3.2.3 /e - ø/ ........................................................................................................................... 29 3.3 Afrikaans ........................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.1 /i - y/ ........................................................................................................................... 29 3.3.2 /ɪ - ʏ/ and /ə/ ............................................................................................................... 30 3.3.3 /e - ø/ ........................................................................................................................... 30 3 4 Experiment ........................................................................................................................32 4.1 Aims................................................................................................................................... 32 4.2 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 33 4.2.1 Design of the data set .................................................................................................... 33 4.2.4 Coding and analysis ....................................................................................................... 35 4.3 Hypotheses ........................................................................................................................ 37 4.3.1 /i – y/ ........................................................................................................................... 37 4.3.2 /ɪ - ʏ/ and /ə/ ............................................................................................................... 38 4.3.3 /e - ø/ ........................................................................................................................... 39 5 Results and discussion ......................................................................................................40 5.1 Vowel contrasts ................................................................................................................ 40 5.1.1 /i - y/ ........................................................................................................................... 40 5.1.2 /ɪ - ʏ/ and /ə/ ............................................................................................................... 46 5.1.3 /e - ø/ ........................................................................................................................... 51 5.2 Comparison with Adank, van Hout & Smits (2004) .......................................................... 57 6 Conclusions and implications ..........................................................................................63 7 References .........................................................................................................................66 4 1 Introduction Studies that have investigated acoustic vowel features (such as spectral quality and duration) by means of acoustic measurements have long been scarce for Dutch and Afrikaans. It is not until recently that the study of the production and perception of these acoustic features in both languages has gained considerable attention; notable studies include, among others, Adank, van Hout & Smits (2004) and Verhoeven & Van Bael (2002a&b) for Northern and/or Southern Standard Dutch (henceforth NSD and SSD, respectively), and Wissing (2011b) for Afrikaans. However, a study that compares the two European standard varieties spoken in the pluricentric Dutch language area1 to standard Afrikaans with respect to acoustic vowel features is yet to be conducted. The present study aims to fill this research gap, and focuses specifically on the aspect of roundedness in the rounded-unrounded close to close-mid near-front to front vowel contrasts /i - y/, /ɪ - ʏ - ə/and /e - ø/2. It is for these vowels that Wissing (2011b) studies the occurrence of derounding in Afrikaans. The current study hopes to present a more elaborate picture by including the SSD and NSD varieties and by working with a larger data set. A first aim then is a descriptive one, for which an account of roundedness of the relevant vowels for each language (variety) is presented3. In Dutch, for instance, roundedness has not yet been acoustically assessed. 1 With NSD being the standard variety spoken in the Netherlands, and SSD the standard variety spoken in Flanders, the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium. 2 Following the phonetic studies by Verhoeven & Van Bael (2002a&b) and Adank, van Hout &
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Language and Space
    Language and Space An International Handbook o Linguistic Variation Volume 2: Language Mapping Edited by Alred Lameli Roland Kehrein Stean Rabanus Oprint De Gruyter Mouton 180 II. Traditions 9. Mapping Dutch and Flemish 1. Introduction 2. Prescientific linguistic maps or dialect data covering the entire Dutch language area 3. Dialect surveys 4. Linguistic atlases of the entire Dutch language area 5. Linguistic atlases or maps covering a Dutch region (regional atlases) 6. Special linguistic atlases or linguistic maps 7. Conclusion 8. Atlases 9. References 1. Introduction The beginnings and growth of dialectology in the Netherlands and Flanders can only be discussed against the background of the situation in neighboring countries. In reaction to the Enlightenment, the Romantic period brought with it an interest in and apprecia- tion of prescientific culture and nostalgia for the past. More attention came to be paid to art, myths, fairy tales and the language of ordinary people past and present, as op- posed to the Enlightenment period interest in cultured standard language. The new focus was imported from the France of Rousseau and the Germany of Schiller. But later devel- opments in the Netherlands and Flanders did not take place in isolation either. Thus, the German linguist Georg Wenker and his French colleague Jules Gillie´ron were the unmistakable precursors of Dutch linguistic atlas projects, while the work of Jean Se´guy and of Hans Goebl served as models for dialectometry in our region. In section 2 of this chapter, we take a brief look at prescientific linguistic maps and dialect collections. In section 3, dialect surveys that have not been developed into linguis- tic atlases are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Discord & Consensus
    c Discor Global Dutch: Studies in Low Countries Culture and History onsensus Series Editor: ulrich tiedau DiscorD & Discord and Consensus in the Low Countries, 1700–2000 explores the themes D & of discord and consensus in the Low Countries in the last three centuries. consensus All countries, regions and institutions are ultimately built on a degree of consensus, on a collective commitment to a concept, belief or value system, 1700–2000 TH IN IN THE LOW COUNTRIES, 1700–2000 which is continuously rephrased and reinvented through a narrative of cohesion, and challenged by expressions of discontent and discord. The E history of the Low Countries is characterised by both a striving for consensus L and eruptions of discord, both internally and from external challenges. This OW volume studies the dynamics of this tension through various genres. Based C th on selected papers from the 10 Biennial Conference of the Association OUNTRI for Low Countries Studies at UCL, this interdisciplinary work traces the themes of discord and consensus along broad cultural, linguistic, political and historical lines. This is an expansive collection written by experts from E a range of disciplines including early-modern and contemporary history, art S, history, film, literature and translation from the Low Countries. U G EDIT E JANE FENOULHET LRICH is Professor of Dutch Studies at UCL. Her research RDI QUIST AND QUIST RDI E interests include women’s writing, literary history and disciplinary history. BY D JAN T I GERDI QUIST E is Lecturer in Dutch and Head of Department at UCL’s E DAU F Department of Dutch.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Guiana Demographics and Living Conditions and the Emergence of Dutch Creoles During the First One Hundred Years, 1580–1675
    journal of language contact 8 (2015) 70-90 brill.com/jlc Dutch Guiana Demographics and Living Conditions and the Emergence of Dutch Creoles during the First One Hundred Years, 1580–1675 Silvia Kouwenberg University of the West Indies, Mona [email protected] Abstract The first one hundred years of the Dutch presence on the “Wild Coast” of Guiana, beginning with exploratory voyages and establishment of trading networks, and cul- minating in the establishment of plantation societies in Berbice and Essequibo, forms the historical context for the emergence of the Dutch creole languages of Berbice and Essequibo. This article explores that historical backdrop, focusing on the early planta- tion colonies, their management, and the presence and roles of different linguistic groups: Amerindian, Dutch, African. Amerindians—both free and enslaved—formed a numerically dominant presence in the initial plantation phase; although they were soon to be outnumbered by enslaved Africans, they were present on and around the plantations throughout the history of these Dutch colonies. It is surprising, then, to note that Arawak-origin material in rather peripheral domains of the Berbice Dutch lexicon forms the sole evidence of an Amerindian presence during its formation. This contrasts sharply with the very central Eastern-Ijo derived contribution to basic lexi- con and bound morphology. On the Dutch side, given the dominance of the south- western provinces in the colonization of both Berbice and Essequibo, it is not surprising that Zeelandic Dutch characteristics can be recognized in many of the Dutch-derived forms. The marginal linguistic role played by Amerindians suggests that the dynamics of slavery determined the linguistic influence of the different groups historically pres- ent in the plantation society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Timing of Nuclear Falls: Evidence from Dutch, West Frisian, Dutch Low Saxon, German Low Saxon, and High German
    Laboratory Phonology 2015; 6(1): 1–52 Jörg Peters*, Judith Hanssen and Carlos Gussenhoven The timing of nuclear falls: Evidence from Dutch, West Frisian, Dutch Low Saxon, German Low Saxon, and High German Abstract: A reading experiment was designed to examine the effects of word boundaries and metrical structure on the temporal alignment of the accentual peak and the end of the fall in nuclear rising-falling accents. Participants were speakers of a number of closely related dialects and languages from the coastal area of the Netherlands and North-West Germany, covering Zeelandic Dutch, Hollandic Dutch, West Frisian, Dutch Low Saxon, German Low Saxon, and Northern High German. Our findings suggest that in no variety is the timing of the nuclear peak or the end of the fall systematically affected by the location of the final word boundary or that of the following stress. In most cases, the accentual peak was found to be stably aligned with the beginning of the nuclear accented syllable, while the end of the fall occurred at a fairly constant distance from the preceding F0 peak. These findings do not support a representation of the nuclear fall by a sequence of a high accentual tone and a ‘phrase accent’ that is secondarily associated to a post- nuclear stress. In addition, we found substantial cross-linguistic variation in the overall timing of the beginning and end of the fall. One component in this variation is a geographically gradient shift in the alignment of the pitch gesture. DOI 10.1515/lp-2015-0004 1 Introduction 1.1 Background One issue that has arisen from two decades of research into the time alignment of tonal targets is the behaviour of post-nuclear tones.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTS Aruþ 5OCIETY in FTANDERS and TI{E NETI{ERLANDS
    ARTS AruÞ 5OCIETY IN FTANDERS AND TI{E NETI{ERLANDS L \ WE8'l'Vlu\AMSCH The Difference Between Language and Dialect in the Netherlands and Flanders IDIOTICON ILH.UI )Ml L.·L. l'flll::liiU Wh.l.ll, fl 1-"J'_I•I --·- ·- ·---·--- .. - 274 Perhaps the real puzzle is why there is so much variation. The small geographi- 041 UW •lAlllJ<J & •Ill' P. cal area of the Netherlands and Flanders is home to hundreds of dialects ac- cording to some counts -some of them mutually unintelligible, all of them di- 0 vided over two languages: Dutch and Frisian. Cl z In this delta area in the northwest corner of Europe variation has been in- grained from time immemorial. Even in the wildest nationalistic fantasies of f-. (/) the nineteenth century, the in habitants were descended not from one people, 0 but from at least three Germanic tribes who settled here: the Franks, the Sax- 0 ons and the Frisians. We also know that when these tribes set foot on it, the Flemish Brabant, the economic centres of the Southern Netherlands. In the seve n- z < area was by no means uninhabited. Even if Little is known about the previous teenth century a great many wealthy, industrious people also came to Holla nd from > inhabitants, there are traces of their language in present day Dutch. those areas, mainly to escape religious persecution. This substantially strength- u So from the very beginning the Linguistic Landscape here was also a delta, ened Holland 's position and introduced elements of the Antwerp dialects and oth- with influxes from elsewhere mixing with local elements in continually chang- ers into the dialects of Holland, making them look more like the standard language.
    [Show full text]
  • Aarhus Danish Atlantic 160116 Dutch As a Koine
    Dutch as a koine? Demography and philology to study the creole texts of St. Thomas Cefas van Rossem 1 Metalinguistic comment May 4, 1727 2 Dutch in the Danish Antilles? • Official correspondence etc. in Dutch • Emergence of Dutch related Creole language: VI Dutch Creole • Linguistic traces • Demographic traces • Which kind of Dutch? Written Dutch differs from spoken Dutch • Dutch Creole highly influenced by Flemish/Zeelandic vernacular • No Flemish/Zeelandic elements in written Dutch texts from Caribbean • How did these elements get into the Creole? 3 Dutch: February 26/5, 1672: message from Staecio 4 Virgin Islands Dutch Creole: Zeelandic/Flemish elements • Alice Stevens (1987): • “Sonda, manda, dissinda, wunsda, dondoda, satoda” Dinsdag • Dutch: English • Maandag Monday • Dinsdag Tuesday • Woensdag Wednesday • Donderdag Thursday • Zaterdag Saturday Dissendag 5 Virgin Islands Dutch Creole: Zeelandic/Flemish elements • En die (twee) Jünger sender a loop, en a vind die Kaakel (met die Meeri) a staan na Tauw bi die Dhor, (before 1780) • And the (two) disciple.3PL walked, Veulen • And found the foal (with the mare) • Stood on rope by the door/gate Kachel 6 Virgin Islands Dutch Creole: Zeelandic/Flemish elements • Metalinguistic comments: - ‘sounds like Flemish which I hear in Ghent’ (Logeman) - ‘Zeelandic is problematic: because you hear elements also in Flanders’ (Hesseling) • Phonology: • Dutch Zeelandic VIDC translation - /ij/ /ie/ /ie/ - Wijn, blij wien, blie wien, blie ‘wine, happy’’ - /ui/ /uu/ /ie/ - Buik, duif buuk, duuf biek, diffie
    [Show full text]
  • Sytze De Bruine. Edited By: Frank Povah
    Text and photos: Sytze de Bruine. Edited by: Frank Povah Christ and Conny live in Axel, a small village in Zeelandic Flanders (Zeeuws- Vlaanderen), and are avid fans of everything that lives and has to do with the hobby of keeping small animals. Both of them spend quite a lot of their free time in visiting and participating in exhibitions in the Netherlands and neighbouring Belgium several times a year, at, among others, the pigeon show ‘De Prachtduif’ in Turnhout, where they are a members and each year enter several pigeons. In the Netherlands you may run across them at many of the larger annual exhibitions, such as the Champion Show, Keistad Show, Pigeon Show South Netherlands SZN, West Brabant Show and the Noordshow – the latter is a 330 km drive for them, and in the Netherlands that is quite a distance! But even there they enter some pigeons. As a young boy, Christ lived in Breda, where he learned all about keeping pigeons from his grandfather who kept Racing Homers. When the birds were due to arrive home, the grandchildren always had to keep quiet and be on their best behaviour. Christ’s grandfather also rewarded him for cleaning his lofts. Christ started with pigeons at 14, but by his 20th birthday pigeons went out of his life – he was more interested in courting the girls. In 1997 he came to live in beautiful Zeelandic Flanders, settling in the village of Zaamslag where he began breeding and flying Homing Pigeons. Above: Christ and Conny in front of their aviary.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Dialect-Speaking and Wages Among Native Dutch Speakers
    Empirica https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9420-z ORIGINAL PAPER Daily dialect‑speaking and wages among native Dutch speakers Yuxin Yao1 · Jan C. van Ours2,3,4,5,6 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Our paper studies the efects of daily dialect-speaking on hourly wages of native Dutch workers. The unconditional diference in median hourly wage between Stand- ard Dutch speakers and dialect speakers is about 10% for males and 8% for females. Taking into account diferences in personal characteristics, family characteristics and geographical diferences, wage diferences are reduced with about 6%-points. Keywords Dialect-speaking · Wage penalty · Job characteristics JEL Classifcation J24 · I2 1 Introduction Language skills are an important determinant of labor market performance. Previous studies have focused on the efect of language profciency on earnings of male immi- grants. Recent examples are Bleakley and Chin (2004), Miranda and Zhu (2013a, b), Di Paolo and Raymond (2012) and Yao and van Ours (2015). However, it is not only language profciency that afects labor market performance. Also, language speech patterns may be important, i.e. it may matter whether a worker speaks a standard language or a dialect. Though among linguists there is no common defnition of * Jan C. van Ours [email protected] Yuxin Yao [email protected] 1 Department of Economics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China 2 Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 3 Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam/Rotterdam, The Netherlands 4 Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia 5 CEPR, London, UK 6 IZA, Bonn, Germany Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Empirica dialects, a dialect is usually referred to a variation of a language used by a particular group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wage Penalty of Dialect-Speaking
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Yao, Yuxin; van Ours, Jan C. Working Paper The Wage Penalty of Dialect-Speaking IZA Discussion Papers, No. 10333 Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Yao, Yuxin; van Ours, Jan C. (2016) : The Wage Penalty of Dialect- Speaking, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 10333, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/149192 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu IZA DP No. 10333 The Wage Penalty of Dialect-Speaking Yuxin Yao Jan C. van Ours October 2016 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor The Wage Penalty of Dialect-Speaking Yuxin Yao CentER, Tilburg University Jan C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phonetic Realization of Focus in West Frisian, Low Saxon, High
    Journal of Phonetics 46 (2014) 185–209 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Phonetics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/phonetics Research Article The phonetic realization of focus in West Frisian, Low Saxon, High German, and three varieties of Dutch ⁎ Jörg Peters a, , Judith Hanssen b, Carlos Gussenhoven b a Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany b Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: This study examines the effects of different kinds of focus and of focus constituent size on the phonetic realization Received 14 May 2013 of accent peaks in declarative sentences in varieties of continental West Germanic. Speakers were drawn from six Received in revised form populations along the coastal line of the Netherlands, covering Zeelandic Dutch, Hollandic Dutch, West Frisian, Dutch 10 July 2014 Low Saxon, German Low Saxon, and Northern High German. Our findings suggest that focus structure has systematic Accepted 17 July 2014 effects on segmental durations, the scaling and timing of the accentual f0 gesture, and on the alignment of f0 targets relative to the beginning of the accented syllable. However, the difference between neutral focus and corrective focus has Keywords: more systematic effects than variation of the size of the focused constituents in corrective focus. In addition, speakers Dutch from different places were found to adopt different strategies in signaling these focus structures. Speakers of Hollandic West Frisian Dutch and West Frisian expanded the pitch span on the accented word, whereas speakers of Low and High German Low Saxon rescaled single targets of the accentual f gesture, and speakers of Zeelandic Dutch mixed both strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Dutch Language Got Disseminated Into the World
    国際政経論集（二松學舍大学）第 25 号，2019 年３月 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE （ARTICLES） How the Dutch Language Got Disseminated into the World Masako Nishikawa-Van Eester 西川（ヴァンエーステル）雅子 Samenvatting Dit artikel exploreert hoe het Nederlands verspreid werd in de wereld en welke invloed het had op de wereldgeschiedenis in het algemeen en op Japan in het bijzonder. Gedurende een zekere tijd waren Nederlands en Chinees de enige informatiekanalen aangaande de buitenwereld in Japan. Nederlands lag mee aan de basis van de modernisering van Japan in de 19de eeuw. De Nederlandse tolken/vertalers van toen werden opgevolgd door zij die Engels studeerden en die Japan verder op weg zetten om een moderne staat te worden. Verder werd Nederlands wereldwijd verspreid door de VOC (“Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie”). Vandaag nog zien we de overblijfselen daarvan in Suriname (Zuid-Amerika), Indonesië (Azië) en Zuid-Afrika (Afrika). De Nederlandse taal heeft duidelijk zijn steentje bijgedragen in het vormen van onze moderne samenleving. Abstract This article explores how the Dutch language spread into the world and how this fact influenced the world history thereafter, including the history of Japan. There was a period in Japan when Dutch and Chinese were the only information channels for the outer world. Dutch has given great influence on the dawn of the Japanese modernization in the 19th century. The Dutch translators/interpreters were succeeded by the English learners, who have propelled the development of Japan as a modern nation. Also, through the VOC, the East India Company, the Dutch language has spread its power and influence all over the world, and even today we see its remnants in Suriname in South America, Indonesia in Asia, and South Africa in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Omslag Vliz36 EN.Indd
    SEA-RELATED WORDS The origin of the names of sandbanks, channels and other ‘sea-related words’ Magda Devos, Roland Desnerck, Nancy Fockedey, Jan Haspeslagh, Willem Lanszweert, Jan Parmentier, Johan Termote, Tomas Termote, Dries Tys, Carlos Van Cauwenberghe, Arnout Zwaenepoel, Jan Seys Have you ever wondered what the origin of the toponym Trapegeer is, or how cod got its name? Or are you interested in the person behind Thornton Bank or the genesis of the maritime term ‘crow’s nest’? Then you’re in luck, since a team of experts explains the meaning of some of the most intriguing sea-related words in every issue of De Grote Rede. In this special issue of De Grote Rede, we focus on the etymology of the toponym Flanders and other place names from the front area of the First World War. Due to limited space, we had to make a selection from the extensive list of cities, towns and villages in the Belgian Westhoek area that were part of the war zone. Incase of places that are no (longer) independent municipalities, we always mention the amalgamated municipality of which they are part. Then we state a few attested forms of the place name, including the oldest one. This information was mainly extracted from the work by F. Debrabandere, M. Devos et al. (2010), De Vlaamse gemeentenamen, verklarend woordenboek. The etymological explanation is also based on this publication, to which we refer the reader for extensive bibliographical references. Some name forms are preceded by an asterisk (*) in the text. This is to indicate that the form in question is not attested as such in a historical source, but has been reconstructed by linguists from derived forms found in more recent language development stages.
    [Show full text]