DOCSLIB.ORG

GUJARAT 1. Historical Background

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GUJARAT 1. Historical Background GUJARAT ❖ 1. Historical Background: The first Legislative Assembly in the Gujarat State was constituted in 1960 with a membership of 132. Prior to this also Legislative institutions did exist in one form or the other in various components of the present State. As far back as in 1918, the ruler of the Bhavnagar State, Shri Bhavasinhji, had established an institution called the Peoples' Representative Assembly. The Assembly had 38 members appointed by His Highness. The members had the right to ask questions. After the death of Shri Bhavasinhji, his son and successor, Shri Krishna Kumarsinhji, formed the Bhavnagar Legislative Assembly in 1941 with 55 members, out of which 33 members were elected, 16 were nominated by His Highness and 6 were ex-officio members. The members had the right to ask questions, move resolutions, discuss the Budget and introduce Bills. The Assembly used to meet at least twice a year. Similar was the case with the then Porbandar State Assembly. In the former Baroda State also, the ruler, Maharaja SayajiraoGaekwad, had formed the Baroda Legislative Assembly as far back as in 1908. Right from 1921, the people of the native States used to send elected representatives to the former Bombay State Legislative Assembly. In 1952, the Saurashtra Legislative Assembly was constituted which continued up to 31 October 1956. Thereafter, Saurashtra State was merged with bigger bilingual Bombay State under the States Reorganisation Act, 1956. On 1 May 1960, the bilingual Bombay State was bifurcated and a new State of Gujarat was constituted under the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960. Accordingly the Gujarat Legislative Assembly was also constituted, and 132 members of the Bombay Legislative Assembly who were elected from Gujarat constituencies, became members of the Gujarat Legislative Assembly. The strength of the Assembly was raised to 154 members in 1962 and to 168 in 1967 and it was further raised to the present strength of 182 in 1975. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bombay Act No. Lxxviii of 1958
    GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT LEGISLATIVE PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT BOMBAY ACT NO. LXXVIII OF 1958 THE JUDICIAL OFFICER PROTECTION(EXTENSION TO HYDERABAD AND SAURASHTRA AREA OF BOMBAY STATE) ACT,1958. (As modified upto the 31st October, 2006) THE JUDICIAL OFFICERS’ PROTECTION (EXTENSION TO HYDERABAD AND SAURASHTRA AREAS OF BOMBAY STATE) ACT, 1958. .................................... CONTENTS PREAMBLE PAGE NO. SECTIONS. 1. Short title. 2. Extension of Act XVIII of 1850 to Hyderabad and Saurashtra areas of Bombay State. 3. Repeal and Saving. BOMBAY ACT NO. LXXVIII OF 19581 [THE JUDICIAL OFFICERS PROTECTIONS (EXTENSIONS TO HYDERABAD AND SAURASHTRA AREAS OF BOMBAY STATE) ACT, 1958.] [7th October , 1958] An Act to extend the Judicial Officers’ Protection Act, 1850, to the Hyderabad and Saurashtra areas of the State of Bombay. XVIII of WHEREAS the Judicial Officers’ Protection Act, 1850, is in force in the whole of 1850. the State of Bombay except the territories which immediately before the 1st November 1956 were comprised in Part B States : AND WHEREAS in the Hyderabad area of the State the Protection of Nazims and Hyd. IV of Servants Act is in force and in the Saurashtra area the Judicial Officers’ Protection Act, 1314. Fasli XVIII of 1850 as adapted and applied by the State of Saurashtra (Application of Central and 1850. Bombay Acts) Ordinance, 1948 is in force ; Sau. Ord. XXV of 1948. AND WHEREAS it is expedient that the Judicial Officers’ Protection Act, 1850 as in force in the rest of the State of Bombay be extended to and brought into force also in the Hyderabad and Saurashtra areas thereof ; and in consequence the corresponding laws aforesaid be repealed ; It is hereby enacted in the Ninth Year of the Republic of India as follows :- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Karnataka-Maharashtra Tussle
    Karnataka-Maharashtra Tussle Why in news? Karnataka CM condemned Maharashtra Deputy CM’s comments over the border dispute between the two states. What is the genesis of the dispute? The erstwhile Bombay Presidency included the present-day Karnataka districts of Vijayapura, Belagavi, Dharwad and Uttara-Kannada. In 1948, the Belgaum municipality requested that the district, having a predominantly Marathi-speaking population, be incorporated into the proposed Maharashtra state. However, the States Reorganisation Act of 1956 made Belgaum and 10 talukas of Bombay State a part of the then Mysore State (renamed as Karnataka in 1973). [The States Reorganisation Act divided states on linguistic and administrative lines] What is the Mahajan Commission report? The States Reorganisation Commission sought to include talukas with a Kannada-speaking population of more than 50% in Mysore. Opponents of the region’s inclusion in Mysore argued that Marathi-speakers outnumbered Kannadigas who lived there in 1956. In September 1957, the Bombay government echoed their demand and lodged a protest with the Centre. This led to the formation of the Mahajan Commission under former Chief Justice Mehr Chand Mahajan in October 1966. In 1967, the Commission recommended that 264 villages be transferred to Maharashtra (which formed in 1960). It also said that Belgaum and 247 villages remain with Karnataka. What was the response? Maharashtra rejected the report, calling it biased and illogical, and demanded another review. Karnataka welcomed the report, and has ever since continued to press for implementation. But, this has not been formally done by the Centre. What was the basis of Maharashtra’s claim? In 2004, the Maharashtra government moved the Supreme Court for a settlement of the border dispute under Article 131(b) of the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic States and Formation of Samyukta Maharashtra
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 20, Issue 12, Ver. IV (Dec. 2015) PP 80-82 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Linguistic States and Formation of Samyukta Maharashtra Ashish Nareshrao Thakare, B. D. College of Engineering, Sevagram Abstract: "The language and culture of an area have an undoubted importance as they represent a pattern of living which is common in that area." - Resolution of the Government of India relating to the State Reorganization Commission, 1953 According to historical records, during the British rule, India was divided into about “600 princely states and provinces”. Language is a major aspect of national consolidation and integration. The reorganization of the states based on the language came to the fore almost immediately after independence. Samyukta Maharashtra Movement was the most powerful movement after independence. The movement received active support from Maharashtrian people. The inclusion of Bombay in the Maharashtra state is considered as the victory of the movement. Marathi Newspapers “Navyug”, Maratha, Samyukta Maharashtra Patrika, Prabhat, Belgaon Samachar, Navakal etc. played a key role to make this movement more mass base. “Maratha” was considered as the mouthpiece of the movement. Marathi Newspapers spearheaded the demand for the creation of a separate Marathi-speaking state with the city of Bombay as its capital. Keywords: movement, Language, spearheaded. I. Introduction: The rise and growth of the Samyukta Maharashtra movement must be studied not merely in the general context of the country-wide agitation for linguistic States but also in the particular context of the society and politics in Maharashtra Language is closely related to culture and therefore to the customs of people.
    [Show full text]
  • How Governments Shape the Risk of Civil Violence: India's Federal
    How Governments Shape the Risk of Civil Violence: India’s Federal Reorganization, 1950–56 Bethany Lacina University of Rochester Governments are absent from empirical studies of civil violence, except as static sources of grievance. The influence that government policy accommodations and threats of repression have on internal violence is difficult to verify without a means to identify potential militancy that did not happen. I use a within-country research design to address this problem. During India’s reorganization as a linguistic federation, every language group could have sought a state. I show that representation in the ruling party conditioned the likelihood of a violent statehood movement. Prostatehood groups that were politically advantaged over the interests opposed to them were peacefully accommodated. Statehood movements similar in political importance to their opponents used violence. Very politically disadvantaged groups refrained from mobilization, anticipating repression. These results call into question the search for a monotonic relationship between grievances and violence and the omission of domestic politics from prominent theories of civil conflict. etween 1946 and 2012, more than half of all coun- as government attempts to influence the risk of civil tries experienced a civil war.1 Almost all coun- violence. B tries have been subject to less organized or less Although policy presumably shapes the probability deadly internal political violence. Alongside these re- of internal conflict, governments are conspicuously ab- alized challenges to civil order, governments also pre- sent from the empirical literature on civil violence. At vent violence through the threat of repression or by least since Collier and Hoeffler’s (2004) provocative di- resolving grievances.
    [Show full text]
  • Iv Political Process in Maharashtra © University of Mumbai
    2042 T.Y.B.A. POLITICAL SCIENCE PAPER - IV POLITICAL PROCESS IN MAHARASHTRA © UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI Dr. Sanjay Deshmukh Vice Chancellor, University of Mumbai Dr. Dhaneswar Harichandan Professor-Cum-Director IDOL, University of Mumbai Programme Co-ordinator : Shri.Anil R. Bankar Asst. Prof. cum -Asst. Director IDOL, Universityof Mumbai Editor & Writer : Prof. S. P. Buwa Associate Professor Dr. T. K. Tope Night College, Parel, Mumbai - 400012 Course Writers : Prof. Avinash Kolhe : Prof. M. Z. Shahid D. G. Ruparel College, Assistant Professor, Matunga, Mumbai - 400016 Maharashtra College of Arts & Science, Byculla, Mumbai - 400008 Prof. Ketan Bhosale : Prof. Monika Verma Sathye College, M. D. College, Vile Parle, Mumbai - 400057 Parel, Mumbai - 400012 Prof. Harshad Bhosale Kirti College, Dadar, Mumbai - 400028 August 2015, TYBA, Political Science, Political Process in Maharashtra Published by : Professor cum Director Institute of Distance and Open Learning , University of Mumbai, Vidyanagari, Mumbai - 400 098. ipin Enterprises DTP Composed : Tantia Jogani Industrial Estate, Unit No. 2, Ground Floor, Sitaram Mill Compound, J.R. Boricha Marg, Mumbai - 400 011 Printed by : CONTENTS Unit No. Title Page No. 1. Historical Background of Political Process in Maharashtra (1818-1960) 1 2. Regionalism - I 3. Caste, Class and Politics 4. Ethnicity, Religion and Politics 5. Non PartyArena 95 6. Political Parties and Elections 1 SECTION - I 1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF POLITICAL PROCESS IN MAHARASHTRA [1818-1960] Unit Structure 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Historical background 1.3 Social Reform Movement 1.4 The Nationalist Movement 1.5 Institutional Nationalsim 1.6 Pune Sarvajanik Sabha 1.7 The Indian National Congress 1.8 The Non Brahmin Movement 1.9 Changes After 1930 1.10 Protest Movement 1.11 Let Us Sum up 1.12 Unit End Exercises 1.0 OBJECTIVES This unit explains 1.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BOMBAY REORGANISATION BILL, I960
    C.B. II No. 103 LOK SABHA THE BOMBAY REORGANISATION BILL, i960 Report of the Joint C ommittee Presented on the 14th April, i960 VMM! LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI April, 1960% Price : Rs. I.SO JoiatAialfrt SnaaiUflg Stuart priim ud to tho fak jaoh^ during thm 3fl thy 11th »flfl ISfck^aaalw&g o f fltwBti t o t &*' a t i * £ u i 9 - aontatian *oloct Coaaittoo on tho Proforonoo 6 . 1 2 . 3 0 6 0 Bharoo( Bofulation o f Blvidando) Billy I 9 6 0 . oa Um Mlfii Land 8.2*3960. Bolding a( Colling) Bill, ]MI. feint CoHitt«i on tho frlfir*tarvra Land -do- Bovonuo and Land hofom# BillyB; * a » . Joint Coaaictoo on tho Manipur Land -do- Boroaao and Land ftafOma Billy 1BBB. Joint Coaalttoo on tho Local praoti- 2B.3.&60 tlonor* a 1 1 1 , lBfii. Joint Goaaiti.fi on th« Boa bay 14.4.1960 Kao realisation Billy IB 60. Joint Coaalttce oc th# Cooptolas 30.8.3960 tAaccdxent) Billy 1B6B a i th. Svldanoo, Joint Coaalttoo on tho Motor 6.12. I960 7 ran apart Koxkora Billy I960 with BTidf^O O . CONTENTS Paob 1. Composition of the Joint Committee . yji) 2. Report of the Joint Committee . ....................................... (y) 3. Minutes of Distent .... ....................................... c » 4. Bill as reported by the Joint Committee .... 1 A p pe n d ix I— Motion in the Lok Sabha for reference of the Bill to Joint Committee . 65 APPENDIX II— Motion in the Rajya Sabha . .... 67 Ap pe n d ix I II— Statement of memoranda/representations received by the Joint Committee 66 Ap p e n d ix IV — Minutes of the Sittings of the Joint C o m m itte e.....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bombay As Capital of Maharashtra
    THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY December 24, 1955 of the 'employment offset', (E 0), ing were neutralized by the increased increased employment. At the end would be Ec — Eb X 100 = EO* quantum of employment varied from of the war, Bombay wage-earners Co — Cb region to region. To illustrate, from were least affected and wage-earn­ With the help of the above for­ the viewpoint of cost of living alone, ers of Madras were slightly worse; mula, an attempt has been made in U P labour was the worst suffer­ Bengal wage-earners were worst Table IV to calculate Eo at the er, that of Bengal being moderately affected, those of U. P. being only end of the war in relation to the pre­ better off, that of Madras though slightly better. war level. This formula can serve least affected over the whole span our purpose only so long as Cc is of the war was only slightly better greater than Cb. For instance, it off than labour in Bombay in 1945. will fail when the two are equal in However, when looking at employ­ which case the resultant denomina­ ment offset, we find that the position tor and E O become equal to zero. of Bengal was the worst, the E O for Its application is thus confined to a Bengal being 19 as against 38 for single base series rather than a chain U P. Madras wage-earners who index series. suffered practically to the same ex­ Apart from the general indication tent as those of Bombay on account of increased cost of living could *The author is indebted to the late that during the war period there was Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Bombay Reorganisation Act 1960
    THE BOMBAY REORGANISATION ACT, 1960 _________ ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS __________ PART I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title. 2. Definitions. PART II REORGANISATION OF BOMBAY STATE 3. Formation of Gujarat State. 4. Amendment of the First Schedule to the Constitution. 5. Saving powers of State Government. PART III REPRESENTATION IN THE LEGISLATURES The Council of States 6. Amendment of the Fourth Schedule to the Constitution. 7. Allocation of sitting members. 8. Bye-elections to fill vacancies. 9. Term of office. The House of the People 10. Representation in the House of the People. 11. Delimitation of parliamentary constituencies. 12. Provision as to sitting members. The Legislative Assemblies 13. Strength of Legislative Assemblies. 14. Delimitation of assembly constituencies. 15. Allocation of members. 16. Duration of Legislative Assemblies. 17. Speakers and Deputy Speakers. 18. Rules of procedure. 19. Special provisions in relation to Gujarat Legislative Assembly. The Legislative Council 20. Amendment of article 168 of the Constitution. 21. Legislative Council of Maharashtra. 22. Council constituencies. 23. Provision as to certain sitting members. 24. Special provision as to biennial elections. 1 SECTIONS 25. Chairman and Deputy Chairman. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes 26. Amendment of the Scheduled Castes Order. 27. Amendment of the Scheduled Tribes Order. PART IV HIGH COURTS 28. High Court for Gujarat. 29. Judges of Gujarat High Court. 30. Jurisdiction of Gujarat High Court. 31. [Repealed.] 32. Practice and procedure in Gujarat High Court. 33. Custody of seal of Gujarat High Court. 34. Form of writs and other processes. 35. Powers of Judges. 36. Procedure as to appeals to Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gazette of India
    REGISTERED No. D. 222 The Gazette of India PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 23] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, JUNE 8, 1957/JYAISTHA 18, 1879 NOTICE The undermentioned Gazettes of India Extraordinary were published upto the 28th May 1957 :— Issue No. and date Issued by Subject No. 265 S.R.O.1730, dated the 22nd Election Commission Election Petition No. 378 of May 1957. India. 1957. 266 S.R.O. 1731, dated the 24th Ministry of Labour and Extension of the period of May 1957. Employment. operation of the Award of the All India Industrial Tribunal (Colliery Disputes), Calcutta. 267 S.R.O. 1732. dated the 23rd Election Commission Notice of retirement by a May 1957. India. contesting candidate to the House of the People. 268 S.R.O. 1733, dated the 25th Ministry of Finance Amendment made in the noti- May 1957. fication No. 33—Customs, dated the 22nd June, 1935. S.R.O. 1734, dated the 25th Ditto. Constitution of a tribunal and May 1957. appointment of members of that Tribunal for the pur- poses of the life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956. 268A S.R.O. 1734A, dated the Ministry of Steel, Mines Amendment made in the Noti- 25th May 1957. and Fuel. fication No. IS(A)-2(144), dated the 23rd August 1956. 269 S.R.O. 1735, dated the 23rd Election Commission Election Petition No. 475 of May 1957. India. 1957. 270 S.R.O. 1736 dated the 22nd Ditto. Election Petition No. 429 of May 1957. 1957. 271 S.R.O. 1737, dated the 24th Ditto. Election Petition No.
    [Show full text]
  • Reorganisation of States the Approach and Arrangements
    THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY October 15. 1955 Reorganisation of States The Approach and Arrangements THE Historic Report of the States justified on grounds of linguistic ho­ be transferred to the State of Reorganisation Commission which mogeneity, because there can be more Madras, and was released early this week will than one state speaking the same (ii) the districts of Malabar and Obviously be the subject of consider­ language without offending the lin­ South Kanara and the Kollegal taluk able discussion throughout the coun­ guistic principle, nor practicable, of the Coimbatore district should be try. The principal recommendations since different language groups, in­ detached from Madras. of the Commission, which consisted cluding the vast Hindi-speaking popu­ The addition to Madras of the five of Shri Saiyid Fazl Ali (Chairman), lation of the Indian Union, cannot taluks which have been mentioned Shri Hriday Nath Kunzru and Shri always be-consolidated to form dis­ will be justified by reason of geo­ K M Pannikar, are summarised be­ tinct linguistic units; and graphical contiguity and linguistic low. The Commission has recom­ (vi) finally, to the extent that the and cultural affinity. It will also mended the establishment of 16 realisation of unilinguism at state meet a clearly-expressed local de­ states without any distinction instead level would tend to breed a particu- mand. of the 27 existing Part A, Part B and larist feeling, counter-balance that Kerala:—The State of Kerala Part C States. In addition, there feeling by positive measures calcu­ should be formed, which should con­ will be three centrally administered lated to give a deeper content to sist of the following areas; areas to be called territories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demand for New States in Indian Federalism - a Case Study of Telangana State
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2016): 79.57 | Impact Factor (2017): 7.296 The Demand for New States in Indian Federalism - A Case Study of Telangana State T. Sreenivas PhD Scholar, Department of Political Science, University of Hyderabad, India Abstract: This paper tries to argue that the demand for the new and smaller states in India at present is mostly influenced by the economic consideration and that it can be accounted within the larger context of the Indian state’s policies, programs and the power of cultural pluralism and political centralism during the past two decades. It also tries to examine various debates on how the demand for new and smaller states affects the federal institutions and their governance in the country. In particular, the recent change from a one-party dominated political system to another coalition politics has created an environment that is more likely to influence the result of these movements. It covers the significance of coalition politics and impact of the recent establishment of three states Uttaranchal, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh in 2000, on the other demands of different kind of movements, claiming for separate statehood. It also provides an overview and public opinion over the demand for smaller in India through field work study of Telangana state demand. Keywords: statehood, Coalition, Constitution, Administration 1. Introduction equal and rapid development of the states. However, the expectation of uniform development could not be satisfied in In recent years, discussion on Indian Federal system is full of some of the states.
    [Show full text]
  • India India, Officially the Republic of India, Has a Size of 3.3 Million Sq Km and an Approximate Population of 1.3 Billion People in 2019
    India India, officially the Republic of India, has a size of 3.3 million sq km and an approximate population of 1.3 billion people in 2019. India is bordered by Pakistan in the west, China, Nepal, and Bhutan in the north-east, Burma and Bangladesh to the east, the Arabian Sea in the South- West, and the Indian Ocean in the South. It is currently organized into five intermediate tiers: states; divisions; districts; subdistricts (or blocks) and municipal corporations/municipalities; and villages or wards. The highest tier consists of 28 states (some with asymmetry in shared rule) plus 5 standard union territories, 2 non-standard union territories, and one special autonomous region (the state of Jammu and Kashmir). In August 2019, Jammu and Kashmir lost special autonomy, and from November 2019, it has been partitioned into two union territories: Jammu & Kashmir, with decentralized authority, and Ladakh, governed directly from Delhi. A second tier of 103 divisions exists currently in twenty states (not in Gujarat, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Sikkim, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram). The third tier has 722 districts (Zilā), including 15 autonomous districts with special autonomy (https://knowindia.gov.in/districts/). A fourth intermediate tier consists of about 5500 subdivisions/ subdistricts (variously named Tehsils, Taluka, Mandal, Kshettra …). These are further divided in community blocks in rural areas. In urban areas, municipal corporations (Mahanahar-Palika)/municipalities (Nagar-Palika)/city councils (Nagar-Panchayat) constitute the fourth tier. We code the municipal corporations in 28 states or territories (225 as of 2019), and we code subdistricts for states where they meet our population criteria.
    [Show full text]