DOCSLIB.ORG

Défense Antimissile En Europe : Variances Conceptuelles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Défense Antimissile En Europe : Variances Conceptuelles VEILIGHEID & STRATEGIE No. 116 SÉCURITÉ & STRATÉGIE November 2013 Lost in Transition? State of the Conflict, Sovereignty, and Post-2014 Prospects in Afghanistan Mr Nicolas Gosset Researcher at the Centre for Security and Defence Studies Royal Higher Institute Royal for Defence Cover picture: “Searching for the Right Way, Somewhere on the Kabul-Kandahar Highway” No known copyright restriction. An electronic version of this document is available and can be downloaded from our website www.rhid.be The comments, views and opinions contended in this text are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Royal Higher Institute for Defence, the Ministry of Defence or the Belgian government authorities alike. Any question, commentary or remark related to this document can be sent to the following address: Director of the Centre for Security and Defence Studies Royal Higher Institute for Defence Renaissance Avenue, 30 1000 Brussels Or by e-mail to: [email protected] ISSN: 0770-9005 Lost in Transition? State of the Conflict, Sovereignty, and Post-2014 Prospects in Afghanistan Mr Nicolas Gosset Researcher at the Centre for Security and Defence Studies Royal Higher Institute for Defence Centre for Security and Defence Studies Renaissance Avenue 30 1000 Brussels This volume is dedicated to all those servicemen, men and women, who for more than ten years have given their all, and sometimes their life, to the project of helping the Afghans to build up their country in the adverse conditions of war. It is for them and for the young Afghans, the men and women, the future generation of leaders who are struggling to obtain an education, get a job, and often to provide economic support for their families. They are the ones who have to be empowered and supported to enable them to make the best future for their country, move it toward lasting peace, and bring about justice and prosperity. Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................... i Table of Figures ........................................................................................... iii List of Maps .................................................................................................. v List of Tables ............................................................................................... vii List of Acronyms ......................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ..................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 3 1. Assessing a Long Decade of War: Strategy, Military Operations and Security Policies, 2001-2014 ............................................................... 15 a. Roots of the Current Conflict ............................................................... 17 b. The Post-09/11 Invasion of Afghanistan and the “Global War on Terror”: Operation Enduring Freedom - Afghanistan ................................... 22 c. Perception of “Victory” Followed by Setback and Deterioration: Iraq as a Fatal Distraction and the Growing Taliban-led Insurgency ............ 28 d. The Obama Administration’s “Surge” (2009-2011) ............................. 44 e. The Race toward “Transition”: Finally a Strategy? .............................. 58 f. Partial Conclusion................................................................................. 77 2. Multilateral State-building in Afghanistan and its Limits: Building up Capacities for What Security? ............................................. 83 a. From Imperialism to Peace-building and Stabilisation as State- building: Doctrines in Afghan Context ......................................................... 86 b. Internationalised State-building in Afghanistan: Highlighting the Limits? ............................................................................... 93 (1) Legitimacy, post-Taliban Governance, and “Liberal Peace” .... 107 i (a) The Bonn Framework 2001-2005 .......................................... 108 (b) The Outcome of the Bonn Process ........................................ 109 i. Post-2001 Institution-building, Weak Government, and Oligarchic Power .................................................................. 113 ii. The Missing Link between ‘Capacity’ and ‘Legitimacy’: Corruption, Marginalization and the Governance Vacuum . 119 iii. Renouncing Liberal Peace? .................................................. 126 (2) Coercion and Security: Taking SSR on a Quantum Leap ........ 129 (a) The Afghan National Army (ANA) ....................................... 133 (b) The Afghan National Police (ANP) ....................................... 145 (c) Supplements to the National Police Forces: The Afghan Local Police (ALP) and Other Local Forces .................................. 151 (d) The Private Security Companies Dilemma ............................ 155 (3) Public Finance, Assistance, and Donor Dependence ......... 162 (a) On the Governance of Aid ..................................................... 173 (b) Counter-insurgency and the “Militarisation of Aid” ............. 175 (c) On the Effectiveness/Human Impact of Aid .......................... 179 c. Partial Conclusion............................................................................... 188 Conclusion and Recommendations ......................................................... 191 Conclusion ......................................................................................... 193 Recommendations ............................................................................. 199 Bibliography ............................................................................................. 205 ii Table of Figures Figure 1: Number of insurgent-initiated attacks (left), and attacks targeting non-combatants (right) in peak month: 2005-2007 ........................ 40 Figure 2: Average monthly insurgent-initiated attacks on ISAF and Coalition forces, Afghan civilians and the Afghan National Security forces (ANSF), January 2006 - December 2010 ........................................... 46 Figure 3: Number of US Army and ISAF (non US) Troops in Afghanistan ................................................................................................... 50 Figure 4: Increasing Civilian Fatalities ......................................................... 53 Figure 5: Increasing Military Fatalities ......................................................... 54 Figure 6: Attacks by Afghan Security Forces against Allied Troops ............ 69 Figure 7: Average monthly insurgent-initiated attacks on ISAF and Coalition forces, Afghan civilians and the ANSF, countrywide, 2008 - 2013 (as of April 2013) ...................................................................... 71 Figure 8: Assessed targets of insurgent attacks (Q.1 2013) .......................... 72 Figure 9: Insurgent-initiated attack volumes, per region, at Q.1 2013 vs. Q.1 2012 ................................................................................................... 72 Figure 10: Time line of selected events and US troops levels in Afghanistan, 2001-2014 ................................................................................ 78 Figure 11: Other foreign (non-US) troops deployed in Afghanistan (OEF-A and ISAF), as of February 2013 ...................................................... 79 Figure 12: Troops committed to NATO-led ISAF, by country, as of February 2013 ........................................................................................... 79 Figure 13: Afghanistan’s Rank in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI) ............................................................. 122 Figure 14: Judges in Kandahar Province ..................................................... 124 Figure 15: Assessment level of Afghan National Army’s kandaks (battalions) ................................................................................................... 141 Figure 16: Afghan Army Units partnered with NATO units....................... 141 Figure 17: Assessment level of Afghan National Police Units ................... 147 Figure 18: ANA and ANP Personnel Fatalities, January 2007 - 2012 ........ 148 Figure 19: Attrition rates among selected ANSF ........................................ 149 iii Figure 20: Afghan Local Police Growth ..................................................... 154 Figure 21: Number of Private Security Contractors in Afghanistan, 2007 through 2011 ...................................................................................... 156 Figure 22: Number of Private US Defence Department Contractors in Afghanistan, 2007 through 2012 ............................................................. 157 Figure 23: ASSF disbursements for ANA (left) and ANP (right) by sub-activity groups (FY2005, 30 September 2012) ............................... 161 Figure 24 (right): ANSF appropriated funds, by fiscal year (US alone) ..... 161 Figure 25 (below): Projected US and other donor support for ANSF ......... 161 Figure 26: International aid, security and military expenditure to Afghanistan (as of January 2011) ................................................................ 163 Figure 27: Partial Costs of US-led OEF and NATO-led ISAF (2001-2009) ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freedom Or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis
    Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 4 Spring 2005 Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr Recommended Citation Hannibal Travis, Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq, 3 Nw. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 1 (2005). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2005 Northwestern University School of Law Volume 3 (Spring 2005) Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights FREEDOM OR THEOCRACY?: CONSTITUTIONALISM IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ By Hannibal Travis* “Afghans are victims of the games superpowers once played: their war was once our war, and collectively we bear responsibility.”1 “In the approved version of the [Afghan] constitution, Article 3 was amended to read, ‘In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.’ … This very significant clause basically gives the official and nonofficial religious leaders in Afghanistan sway over every action that they might deem contrary to their beliefs, which by extension and within the Afghan cultural context, could be regarded as
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict in Afghanistan I
    Conflict in Afghanistan I 92 Number 880 December 2010 Volume Volume 92 Number 880 December 2010 Volume 92 Number 880 December 2010 Part 1: Socio-political and humanitarian environment Interview with Dr Sima Samar Chairperson of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission Afghanistan: an historical and geographical appraisal William Maley Dynamic interplay between religion and armed conflict in Afghanistan Ken Guest Transnational Islamic networks Imtiaz Gul Impunity and insurgency: a deadly combination in Afghanistan Norah Niland The right to counsel as a safeguard of justice in Afghanistan: the contribution of the International Legal Foundation Jennifer Smith, Natalie Rea, and Shabir Ahmad Kamawal State-building in Afghanistan: a case showing the limits? Lucy Morgan Edwards The future of Afghanistan: an Afghan responsibility Conflict I in Afghanistan Taiba Rahim Humanitarian debate: Law, policy, action www.icrc.org/eng/review Conflict in Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal web site at: ISSN 1816-3831 http://www.journals.cambridge.org/irc Afghanistan I Editorial Team Editor-in-Chief: Vincent Bernard The Review is printed in English and is Editorial assistant: Michael Siegrist published four times a year, in March, Publication assistant: June, September and December. Claire Franc Abbas Annual selections of articles are also International Review of the Red Cross published on a regional level in Arabic, Aim and scope 19, Avenue de la Paix Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish. The International Review of the Red Cross is a periodical CH - 1202 Geneva, Switzerland published by the ICRC. Its aim is to promote reflection on t +41 22 734 60 01 Published in association with humanitarian law, policy and action in armed conflict and f +41 22 733 20 57 Cambridge University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Disarmament, Demobilisation, Reintegration in Afghanistan
    DIIS REPORT 2006:7 FROM SOLDIER TO CIVILIAN: DISARMAMENT DEMOBILISATION REINTEGRATION IN AFGHANISTAN Peter Dahl Thruelsen DIIS REPORT 2006:7 DIIS REPORT DIIS DANISH INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 1 DIIS REPORT 2006:7 © Copenhagen 2006 Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS Strandgade 56, DK-1401 Copenhagen, Denmark Ph: +45 32 69 87 87 Fax: +45 32 69 87 00 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.diis.dk Cover Design: Carsten Schiøler Layout: Allan Lind Jørgensen Printed in Denmark by Vesterkopi AS ISBN: 87-7605-146-3 Price: DKK 50.00 (VAT included) DIIS publications can be downloaded free of charge from www.diis.dk Hardcopies can be ordered at www.diis.dk This report is a result of the ongoing research cooperation between The Royal Danish Defence College and the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS). The report is published as part of Defence and Security Studies Research Programme at DIIS, which is funded by the Danish Ministry of Defence. Peter Dahl Thruelsen is Research Fellow at the Institute for Strategy at the Royal Danish Defence College. Tel +45 3915 1211, e-mail: [email protected] 2 DIIS REPORT 2006:7 Summary This report sets out to explore the processes of disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) within the context of post-conflict peace-building. I have tried to investigate the transformation of soldiers to civilians in the aftermath of war. The purpose of the research is to facilitate practical recommendations of DDR to be used in future cases of post-conflict peace-building. The empirical focus of this study is the post-conflict DDR programme in Af- ghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Ÿþm I C R O S O F T W O R
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Knowledge Repository Open Network Indo - Afghan Relations since 9/11 Dissertation Submitted to the University of Kashmir in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of Degree of Master of Philosophy (M. Phil) In Political Science By Ashfaq Maqsood Ali Under the Supervision of Dr. Tabasum Firdous (Assistant Professor (Sr.) in Political Science) Centre of Central Asian Studies University of Kashmir Srinagar J&K- 190006 2013 CENTRE OF CENTRAL ASIAN STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR, SRINAGAR Certificate Certified that the dissertation entitled “Indo - Afghan Relations since 9/11” submitted by Ashfaq Maqsood Ali, in partial fulfillment of M. Phil Degree in the Discipline of Political Science is an original piece of research work. This work has not been submitted fully or partially so far anywhere for the award of any degree. The scholar worked under my supervision on whole-time basis for the period required under statutes and has put in the required attendance in the Centre. Dr. Tabasum Firdous Supervisor Centre of Central Asian Studies Prof. Aijaz A. Bandey University of Kashmir Director Centre of Central Asian Studies University of Kashmir Declaration I solemnly declare that the dissertation entitled “Indo-Afghan Relations since 9/11” submitted by me in the discipline of Political Science under the supervision of Dr. Tabasum Firdous embodies my own contribution. This work which does not contain any piracy has not been submitted, so far anywhere
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Post-War Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy
    Order Code RL30588 Afghanistan: Post-War Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Updated October 15, 2008 Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Afghanistan: Post-War Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary U.S. and outside assessments of the effort to stabilize Afghanistan are increasingly negative, to the point where top U.S. commanders say they are not sure the effort is “winning” and some partner commanders say the effort is being lost. U.S. and outside assessments emphasize a growing sense of insecurity in areas around Kabul previously considered secure, increased numbers of suicide attacks and civilian deaths, and divisions within the NATO alliance about total troop contributions and missions. Both the official U.S. as well as outside assessments are increasingly pointing to Pakistan, and particularly the new Pakistani government, as failing to prevent Taliban and other militant infiltration from Pakistan. Although available U.S. forces are short, the Administration is conducting a review of U.S. strategy, adding U.S. troops to the Afghanistan theater, consolidating the command structure for U.S. and partner forces, expanding the Afghan National Army, and attempting to accelerate development activities to increase support for the Afghan government. The Administration also has increased direct U.S. action against Taliban concentrations inside Pakistan. The central government is relatively stable, but it is perceived as weak, corrupt, and unresponsive to core needs, causing popular disillusionment. A key component of U.S. strategy is to try to compel the Afghan government to redress these deficiencies. Yet, Afghan officials point to progress in that the post-Taliban transition was completed with the convening of a parliament in December 2005, following parliamentary elections in September 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Disarmament and Rearmament in Afghanistan
    [PEACEW RKS [ THE POLITICS OF DISARMAMENT AND REARMAMENT IN AFGHANISTAN Deedee Derksen ABOUT THE REPORT This report examines why internationally funded programs to disarm, demobilize, and reintegrate militias since 2001 have not made Afghanistan more secure and why its society has instead become more militarized. Supported by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) as part of its broader program of study on the intersection of political, economic, and conflict dynamics in Afghanistan, the report is based on some 250 interviews with Afghan and Western officials, tribal leaders, villagers, Afghan National Security Force and militia commanders, and insurgent commanders and fighters, conducted primarily between 2011 and 2014. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Deedee Derksen has conducted research into Afghan militias since 2006. A former correspondent for the Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant, she has since 2011 pursued a PhD on the politics of disarmament and rearmament of militias at the War Studies Department of King’s College London. She is grateful to Patricia Gossman, Anatol Lieven, Mike Martin, Joanna Nathan, Scott Smith, and several anonymous reviewers for their comments and to everyone who agreed to be interviewed or helped in other ways. Cover photo: Former Taliban fighters line up to handover their rifles to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan during a reintegration ceremony at the pro- vincial governor’s compound. (U.S. Navy photo by Lt. j. g. Joe Painter/RELEASED). Defense video and imagery dis- tribution system. The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt. Vernon Neighborhood
    Mount Vernon’s Hometown Newspaper • A Connection Newspaper June 1, 2017 Police Practices Improve, Citizens Demand More Board cites progress on Police Practices improvements, but Gazette Worker/The by Andrea Photos some citizens demand more. By Andrea Worker The Gazette ohn Lovaas admitted that he was a bit of a skeptic. Speaking at the JMay 22 meeting to update Fairfax County residents on the Ad Hoc Police Practices Review Commission’s rec- ommendations, the Restonian acknowl- Caycee Utley of Fairfax stands amid protest signs and edged that he hadn’t been expecting all that Supervisor John Cook (R-Braddock), as chair of the fellow members of Showing up for Racial Justice. The much to come from the 32-member com- board’s Public Safety Committee, co-hosted a public group doesn’t think any real progress has been made mission established by Board of Supervisors forum updating citizens on the recommendations to “end racism and brutality, particularly against Chairman Sharon Bulova — in spite of the made by the Ad Hoc Police Practices Review Com- minorities” and hold law enforcement accountable fact that Lovaas had actually been chosen mission. for their actions. as an alternate representative. “But I am more and more impressed by from the audience were Bulova; Supervi- had already approved and implemented or possible results. what’s coming out of the implementation sor John Cook (R-Braddock); Police Chief put in motion 172 of the 202 recommenda- stage,” said Lovaas. Edwin Roessler, Jr.; Richard Schott, inde- tions that the commission presented in its TWO NEW FORMS of independent over- Lovaas may now be cautiously optimis- pendent police auditor; Adrian Steel, Ad final report on Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Afghans‟, a Useful Construct for Achieving Results in Afghanistan
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 1 No. 6; June2011 „Common Afghans‟, A useful construct for achieving results in Afghanistan Fahim Youssofzai Associate Professor (Strategic Management) Department of Business Administration, RMC/CMR P.O. Box: 17000, Stn. Forces Kingston, Ontario, K7K 7B4, Canada E-mail: [email protected], Phone: (613) 541 6000 Abstract Considering the seemingly perpetual problems in Afghanistan, this paper defines a new construct – the Common Afghans – and argues why it should be considered in strategic reflections and actions related to stability of this country. It tries to show that part of ill-performance in comes from the fact that the contributions of an important stakeholder “the Common Afghans” are ignored in the processes undertaken by international stakeholders in this country since 2002. It argues why considering the notion “Common Afghans” is helpful for achieving concrete results related to different initiatives undertaken in Afghanistan, by different stakeholders. Key words: Afghanistan, Common Afghans, Accurate unit of analysis, Policies, Strategies 1. Introduction Afghanistan looks to be in perpetual turmoil. In a recent desperate reflection, Robert Blackwill, a former official in the Bush administration and former US ambassador to India suggests partition of Afghanistan since the US cannot win war in this county (POLITICO, 2010). On same mood, Jack Wheeler defines Afghanistan as “...a problem, not a real country…”. According to Wheeler, “…the solution to the problem is not a futile effort of “nation-building” – that effort is doomed to fail – it is nation-building‟s opposite: get rid of the problem by getting rid of the country…” (Wheeler, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Violence, Terrorism, and Identity Politics in Afghanistan: the Securitisation of Higher Education
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Violence, Terrorism, and Identity Politics in Afghanistan: The Securitisation of Higher Education Christian Kaunert 1,* and Arif Sahar 2 1 International Centre for Policing and Security, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 4BD, UK 2 Centre of Excellence in Terrorism, Resilience, Intelligence and Organised Crime Research [CENTRIC], Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This article investigates the securitisation of the higher education sector in Afghanistan by examining ‘hidden’ non-discursive practices as opposed to overt discursive threat construction. Non-discursive practices are framed by the habitus inherited from different social fields, whereas in Afghanistan, securitising actors converge from different habitus (e.g., institutions, professions, backgrounds) to bar the ‘other’ ethnic or social groups from resources and spaces which could empower these groups to become a pertinent threat, a fear, and a danger to the monopoly of the state elites over the state power and resources. The most prominent securitisation practices emerging from the data include mainly (1) the obstruction of the formation of critical ideas and politics; (2) the obstruction of economic opportunities; and (3) the obstruction of social justice. This article deploys a case study methodology and uses the Kabul University as its subject of investigation. Keywords: Afghanistan; securitisation; violence; higher education; identity politics; statebuilding Citation: Kaunert, Christian, and Arif Sahar. 2021. Violence, Terrorism, 1. Introduction and Identity Politics in Afghanistan: The Afghan state has been juggling an amalgamation of competing forces, including The Securitisation of Higher the power of Islam, tribal politics, ethnic grievances, socioeconomic underdevelopment, Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Instances of Journalist's Murder, Insult, Arrests, and Treat in 2011 in Afghanistan Total
    instances of Journalist's murder, insult, arrests, and treat in 2011 in Afghanistan Date of Place of months No Name of journalist and media type of incident Cause of incident Remarks incident incident 1 18 Razaq Mamon, Bost e Bastan news agency's official injured Kabul unknown people aqua spray Sayed jan Sabawon, Radio Azady's reporter Threat Kabul American solder and ANA ۰ 2 3 9 Assadullah Wahedi, manager of Sarnawest magazen Arrested Kabul General attorney Jan/11 4 0 Najibullah, Muher TV's reporter Beat Takhar Head of north courts 5 2 Jamshid Muhmand, Ayena televion's reporter Beat Kabul Trafic officer 6 0 Nazari Paryani, manager of Mandegar daily Threat Kabul unknow people 7 23 Haseb Ahmad Hujati, Noor TV's reporter Threat Jawzjan Scurity Commander 8 31 Radio Payman'd gard Beat Baghlan Hezbe Islami people 9 19 Kanishka Turkistani, BBC televion's reporter Beat Bulkh Bulkh University authorities February 10 2 Jawad Sarwari, Ansar daily's maneger Beat Kabul president gards 11 21 Sayed jan Sabawon, director of videos of Radio Azadi's webpage Beat Kabul Trafic officer Suhila weda, Khamush Radio Keled's Journalist Threat Kabul unknow people March 12 28 13 15 Ahmad Masseh, National Radio TV worker Beat Kabul door security gard of RTA 14 15 Massoud, National Radio TV worker Beat Kabul door security gard of RTA 15 15 Saleh Muhammad, National Radio TV worker Beat Kabul door security gard of RTA 16 15 Muhammad Khalil, National Radio TV worker Beat Kabul door security gard of RTA 17 2 Basher Ahmad Nadem, Pazwak's reporter Beat Qandahar protesters
    [Show full text]
  • SECOND-GENERATION AFGHANS in NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES from Mohajer to Hamwatan: Afghans Return Home
    From mohajer to hamwatan: Afghans return home Case Study Series SECOND-GENERATION AFGHANS IN NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES From mohajer to hamwatan: Afghans return home Mamiko Saito Funding for this research was December 2007 provided by the European Commission (EC) and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit i Second-Generation Afghans in Neighbouring Countries © 2007 Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit. Permission can be obtained by emailing [email protected] or calling +93 799 608 548. ii Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit From mohajer to hamwatan: Afghans return home About the Author Mamiko Saito is the senior research officer on migration at AREU. She has been work- ing in Afghanistan and Pakistan since 2003, and has worked with Afghan refugees in Quetta and Peshawar. She holds a master’s degree in education and development studies from the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom. About the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit The Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU) is an independent research organisation headquartered in Kabul. AREU’s mission is to conduct high-quality research that informs and influences policy and practice. AREU also actively pro- motes a culture of research and learning by strengthening analytical capacity in Afghanistan and facilitating reflection and debate. Fundamental to AREU’s vision is that its work should improve Afghan lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S
    Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs March 1, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30588 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary During 2009, the Obama Administration addressed a deteriorating security environment in Afghanistan. Despite an increase in U.S. forces there during 2006-2008, insurgents were expanding their area and intensity of operations, resulting in higher levels of overall violence. There was substantial Afghan and international disillusionment with corruption in the government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, and militants enjoyed a safe haven in parts of Pakistan. Building on assessments completed in the latter days of the Bush Administration, the Obama Administration conducted two “strategy reviews,” the results of which were announced on March 27, 2009, and on December 1, 2009, respectively. Each review included a decision to add combat troops, with the intent of creating the conditions to expand Afghan governance and economic development, rather than on hunting and defeating insurgents in successive operations. The new strategy has been propounded by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who was appointed top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan in May 2009. In his August 30, 2009, initial assessment of the situation, Gen. McChrystal recommended a fully resourced, comprehensive counter-insurgency strategy that could require about 40,000 additional forces (beyond 21,000 additional U.S. forces authorized in February 2009). On December 1, 2009, following the second high level policy review, President Obama announced the following: • The provision of 30,000 additional U.S.
    [Show full text]