DOCSLIB.ORG

Velikovsky-Ages-In-C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Velikovsky-Ages-In-C 127656 Immanuel Velikovsky AGES IN CHAOS VOLUME I FROM THE EXODUS TO KING AKHNATON Doubleday & Company, Inc. GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK, 1952 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 52-5224 COPYRIGHT, 1952, BY IMMANUEL VELIKOVSXY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES AT THE COUNTRY LIFE PRESS, GARDEN CITY, N.Y, FIRST EDITION FOREWORD IN CHAOS was conceived in the spring of 1940. It was then that I realized that the Exodus had occurred in the midst of a natural and that As upheaval this catastrophe might prove be the to connecting link between the Israelite and Egyptian his- tories, if ancient Egyptian texts were found to contain references a to similar event. I found such references and before long had worked out a of reconstruction of plan ancient history from the Exodus to the conquest of the East by Alexander the Great. Already by October of the same year I had come to understand the nature extent of and that catastrophe. For a decade after that I worked simultaneously on Ages in Chaos and Worlds in Collision, the present work requiring the lion's share of the toil. in Ages Chaos covers largely the period dealt with in Worlds in Collision the eight hundred years from the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt to the invasion of Palestine by Sennacherib in 687 be- fore the present era, and the additional three and a half centuries to Alexander of Macedonia, altogether twelve hundred years of the history of the ancient East. But whereas the first work con- centrated on the description of the physical history of the period, the present work deals with its political and cultural aspects. The occurrence of a widespread natural catastrophe serves here only as the point of departure for constructing a revised chronology of the times and lands under consideration. I searched the records of one land after another and went from one generation to another, taking from everywhere hints and clues, to evidence and proof. Because I had to discover and collate them, that in this book is written like a detective story. It is well known detective work unexpected associations are often built on minute a hair on a window details: a fingerprint on a bar of metal, sill, a burnt-out match in the bushes. Some details of an archaeological, Vi FOREWORD minor chronological, or paleographic nature may seem matters, of in which the his- but they are the fingerprints an investigation is involved. Such tory of many nations in many generations vitally details are not included to make the reading difficult; they are necessary to establish the main thesis of this work. Therefore, any to a fruitless attempt to read this book cursorily will prove be undertaking. is established Correct strategy requires that once a bridgehead it should be fortified. Is it good judgment, instead, to open a second front against a new adversary? After the publication of Worlds in Collision) a volume describing two acts of a celestial and terrestrial drama, reconstructed from the collective memory of the human race, a wise and proper move would have been to strengthen my position by following with a volume of geological and paleontological evidence of the same dra- matic events in the life of the earth. And since this material from the realm of stones and bones is not rare but abundant, such an undertaking would seemingly not be difficult. It was therefore a great temptation for me to continue from where I had left off in Worlds in Collision, to prove again and again, from new angles, that catastrophes did take place and did disrupt .slow-moving evo- lution in inanimate as well as animate nature. And in fact, since the publication of Worlds in Collision, I have devoted myself to organ- izing the evidence from geology and prehistory to supplement the literary and historical evidence of cosmic catastrophism, and to writ- ing Earth in Upheaval, only little concerned with the storm aroused by my first book. But I found that the arguments presented in that book not were given a careful hearing, or even reading, particularly by those who protested the loudest. Would it help to produce in haste still evidence? inner more In my council on strategy, I de- cided to tarry no longer with Ages in Chaos, my opus magnum. I call Ages in Chaos the second front because, after having dis- rupted the complacent peace of mind of a powerful group of as- tronomers and other textbook writers, I offer here major battle to the historians. The two volumes of the present work will bo as dis- turbing to the historians as Worlds in Collision was to the astron- POREWOED Vli omers. It is conceivable that historians quite will have even greater difficulties in their views and in psychological revising accepting the of sequence ancient history as established in Ages in Chaos than the astronomers had in accepting the story of cosmic catas- in trophes the solar system in historical times. Indeed, a distin- who has followed this guished scholar, work from the completion of first draft in the 1942, expressed this very idea. He said that he knows of no valid the argument against reconstruction of history but that presented here, psychologically it is almost impossible to views in the course of change acquired decades of reading, writ- ing, and teaching. The to reconstruct attempt radically the history of the ancient twelve hundred in the life world, years of many nations and king- doms, unprecedented as it is, will meet severe censure from those in their who, teaching and writing, have already deeply committed to the old of themselves concept history. And many of those who look to acknowledged authorities for guidance will express their a disbelief that truth could have remained undiscovered so long, from which they will deduce that it cannot be a truth. Should I have heeded the abuse with which a group of scientists condemned Worlds in Collision and its author? Unable to prove the of it or book or any part wrong any quoted document spurious, the members of that group indulged in outbursts of unscientific fury. They suppressed the book in the hands of its first publisher by the threat of a boycott of all the company's textbooks, despite the fact that when the book was already on the presses the publisher agreed to submit it to the censorship of three prominent 'scientists and it passed that censorship. When a new publisher took the book over, this group tried to suppress it there, too, by threats. They forced the dismissal of a scientist and an editor who openly took an ob- of academic faculties jective stand, and thus drove many members into clandestine reading of Worlds in Collision and correspondenpe with its author. The of and still alert guardians dogmau.were, are, to stamp out the new teaching by exorcism and not by argument, which degrading the learned guild in the eyes of the broad public, to does not believe that censorship and suppression are necessary defend the truth. And here is a rule by which to know whether or Vlli FOREWORD not a book is spurious: Never in the history of science has a spurious book aroused a storm of anger among members of scientific bodies. But there has been a storm every time a leaf in the book of knowl- edge has been turned over. "We are most likely to get angry and excited in our opposition to some idea when we ourselves are not quite certain of our own position, and are inwardly tempted to take the other side."1 A scientific approach requires, first, reading, then thinking and of an case investigation, and, lastly, the expression opinion. In the of Worlds in Collision the procedure was repeatedly reversed. Sci- entific rejection demands invalidation of the evidence presented. Nothing of the kind was done with Worlds in Collision. The few arguments offered whatever could be gathered from numerous re- in a debate with Professor viewsI answered point by point J. Q. Stewart, astronomer at Princeton University, published in the June 1951 issue of Harpers magazine, fourteen months after the publica- tion of the book. No argument was left unanswered, and no new one has been presented since then, though emotional outbursts have not ceased. Finally, a new strategy was employed: the views expounded in Worlds in Collision were appropriated piecemeal by those who first opposed them, though not with frankness and candor, but rather under the guise of showing how wrong the author of that heretical book is. At present no chapter of Worlds in Collision needs to be rewritten and no thesis revoked. Great are the changes in the political history of the ancient East in in 1 to offered Ages Chaos, claim the right fallibility in de- tails and I eagerly welcome constructive criticism. However, before proclaiming that the entire structure must collapse because an argument can be made against this or that point, the critic should carefully weigh his argument against the whole scheme, complete with all its evidence. The historian who permits his attention to be monopolized by an argument directed against some detail, to the extent of overlooking the work as a whole and the manifold proofs on it which stands, will only demonstrate the narrowness of his ap- proach to history. He will be like that "conscientious scientist,* Thomas Mann, Budderibrooks. FOREWORD IX Professor Twist, in Ogden Nash's verse, who went on an expedition to the jungles, taking his bride with him. When, one day, the guide brought the tidings to him that an alligator had eaten her, the professor could not but smile.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Twelfth Planet Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    TWELFTH PLANET PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Zecharia Sitchin | 464 pages | 15 Mar 2007 | HarperCollins Publishers Inc | 9780061379130 | English | New York, NY, United States Twelfth Planet PDF Book Read it to expand your picture of our tiny existence. Lean over his neck and feel his body rippling under you. All in all this was a fun book to read, but if Sitchin was correct, it would only mean that the bible, and all the world mythologies and gods and goddesses, were not really divinely inspired after all, nor were these beings ever well intended in regards to our well being. The product of thirty years of intensive research, The 12th Planet is the first book in Zecharia Sitchin's prophetic Earth Chronicles series--a revolutionary body of work that offers indisputable documentary proof of humanity's extraterrestrial forefathers. So, if you are a religious person, you will definitely dismiss this book because it runs against the Biblical teaching that we were created in the image and likeness of God via Adam and Eve as mentioned in the first book of the Holy Bible, Genesis. Quite honestly, I appreciate Sitchin's attention to fine detail and even though it does feel repetitive at times, I appreciate how he shows all connections to the Sumerian tablets. Leroy This created Homo-Sapeins the perfect worker. It was after this that the Anunaki chose to teach humans the rudiments of civilization. Alford admits he initially became "infatuated" with Sitchin's hypotheses but later became a critic of Sitchin's interpretations of myth. Within twelve orbits the object would be either ejected or converted to a short period object.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Pharaoh Hatshepsut Is Not to Be Equated to the Queen of Sheba Patrick Clarke
    Viewpoint Why Pharaoh Hatshepsut is not to be equated to the Queen of Sheba Patrick Clarke This article looks at the linguistic, textual and other problems of equating the Pharaoh Hatshepsut with the Queen of Sheba. This is one of the central pillars of the revised chronology of the Ancient Near East, particularly Egypt, first mooted by Immanuel Velikovsky in the middle of the last century, and taken up by other writers since, including works that are very popular in creationist circles. The conclusion is that this Hatshepsut/Sheba identification is not tenable in the light of the available evidence. any Christians today are greatly influenced by the so that they line up with the Bible, their interpretation of the Mrevisionist claims of four people in particular. Firstly, evidence raises serious questions about their methodology and Immanuel Velikovsky, a Russian-born psychoanalyst, who often their expertise in the area. For example, Velikovsky’s authored a number of books in which he proposed numerous lack of competence as a historian was brutally exposed in radical interpretations of history. In Ages in Chaos (1952),1 1965, by the expert cuneiformist, Abraham Sachs, in a forum Velikovsky, who would not have called himself a Bible- at Brown University, Rhode Island.6 Sachs had much to say believer, described what he thought were parallels between about Velikovsky’s claims on Mesopotamian history. This is Egyptian history and the biblical accounts covering the part of what Sachs had to say: period from the Exodus to the early years of the Divided “In 1896, an excellent dictionary of Akkadian Monarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudoscience: Objective Or Subjective?
    Pseudoscience: Objective or Subjective? MICHAEL RUSE ABSTRACT WORK TYPE What is pseudo–science and when do charges of pseudo–scientific thinking Article generally arise? These questions are answered by looking at six examples where the charge of pseudo–science has arisen: anti–vaccination and the ARTICLE HISTORY claims that it causes illnesses, Creationism – the claim that the Bible is Received: literally true –, chiropractic and claims about curing cancer and the like, pre– 19–May–2019 Darwinian evolution, that is developmental hypotheses before the Origin of Accepted: Species (1859), Immanuel Velikovsky and his book, Worlds in Collision, and 14–July–2019 the Gaia hypothesis that the Earth is an organism. It is agreed that there is an Published Online: objective foundation to charges of pseudo–science and the author’s 24–November–2019 testimony in a court case in Arkansas in 1981, arguing that Creationism is not genuine science, is used to support this claim. Karl Popper’s criterion of ARTICLE LANGUAGE demarcation invoking falsifiability is a key notion here. However, it is argued English that charges of pseudo–science occur most frequently when conventional practitioners are under threat. Then claims of pseudo–science are used to KEYWORDS attack the non–conventional opposition. The examples are used to support Pseudoscience this conclusion. Falsiability Evolution Velikovsky Gaia © Studia Humanitatis – Universidad de Salamanca 2020 M. Ruse (✉) Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin Florida State University, United States Vol. 9, No. 13, Jun. 2020, pp. 0–00 e–mail: [email protected] ISSN: 2254–0601 | www.disputatio.eu © The author(s) 2020. This work, published by Disputatio [www.disputatio.eu], is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [BY–NC–ND].
    [Show full text]
  • Michael D. Gordin. the Pseudoscience Wars. Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe
    528 Reseñas Dynamis 2013; 33 (2): 505-537 Michael D. Gordin. The pseudoscience wars. Immanuel Velikovsky and the birth of the modern fringe. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press; 2012, 291 p. ISBN-13: 978-0-226-30442-7, € 21,25. The pseudoscience wars tiene dos propósitos: por un lado, intenta rescatar la fi- gura del psicoanalista ruso-judío Immanuel Velikovsky (1895-1979) y sus con- trovertidas teorías, tachadas de pseudocientíficas; por otro lado, utiliza el caso de Velikovsky para discutir los procesos científico-sociales de demarcación cien- tífica. En este sentido, el libro de Michael D. Gordin, historiador de la ciencia de la Princeton University, se enmarca dentro de los estudios sociológicos del «boundary-work» y el problema filosófico de la demarcación. El título hace referencia a las llamadas «science wars» de mediados de los 90, en donde se intentó desacreditar los estudios humanísticos de la ciencia que cuestionaban su objetividad. Dividido en seis capítulos, The pseudoscience wars ofrece una estructura clara y efectiva respecto a sus objetivos. El lector queda rápidamente fascinado por el caso de Velikovsky, hilo conductor del libro. Como expone Gordin en los dos primeros capítulos, la obra de Velikovsky Worlds in collision (1950) generó una gran controversia en la comunidad científica de Esta- dos Unidos, país al que había emigrado en 1939. En Worlds in collision, Velikovsky exponía sus conclusiones tras décadas de investigación analizando los mitos de la antigüedad, especialmente los relativos a las catástrofes relatadas en la Biblia hebrea. En su opinión, dichas catástrofes ocurrieron en realidad y fueron causa- das por agentes extraterrestres, los cuales llegó a identificar.
    [Show full text]
  • Oedipus – Akhenaten
    MUSIC THEATRE PROJECT OEDIPUS – AKHENATEN CONCEPT AND REALIZATION KA – Cornelia Müller Pharaoh Akhenaten, Pharaoh Nefertiti with children Aten is depicted in form of the solar disk, whose rays are giving life (ca. 1350 BC) MUSIC THEATRE PROJECT OEDIPUS – AKHENATEN The Russian doctor, psychoanalyst, philosopher, archaeologist and astronomer Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky wondered what the character of the Sphinx had to do with a Greek story. After thorough research in Egyptian archaeology, he came to the conclusion that Pharaoh Akhenaten is the historic basis for the tragedy King Oedipus of Greek mythology. King Oedipus and Pharaoh Akhenaten are two theatre pieces based on this historical analogy, and they tell similar stories in different ways. For Oedipus it is the classical triangular relationship -- father/mother/son; for Akhenaten it is mother/son/wife. Each of these triads will be represented by a single actor (Oedipus) or actress (Akhenaten), who will incorporate all the monologues of the different roles using different techniques such as acrobatics, costumes and masks. Both pieces are staged inside a twin-spiraled labyrinth of mirrors, preferably in a forest or, if performed in an urban setting, with an installation made of bamboo. One path goes from the outside to the center and another leads outside again. The manifold reflections create a surreal world. The person in the mirror is fiction and reality, ageless and at the same time very present in the real world. Both pieces will be performed in German, with Italian or English subtitles. King Oedipus tells the story of a violent father meeting his own death in a way that he had envisaged for his son.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Age of Greece
    THE DARK AGE OF GREECE Immanuel Velikovsky THE DARK AGE OF GREECE by Immanuel Velikovsky CONTENTS A Technical Note Preface The Reconstruction of Ancient History CHAPTER I: THE HOMERIC QUESTION The Setting of the Stage The Homeric Question Why No Literary Relics from Five Centuries? The Allies of Priam Troy in the Dark Ages Aeneas The Dark Age in Asia Minor Olympic Games in the Iliad CHAPTER II: MUTE WITNESSES Troy and Gordion Mute Witnesses The Lion Gate of Mycenae A Votive Cretan Cave Olympia Etruria “The Scandal of Enkomi” Sicily Tiryns Mycenae and Scythia CHAPTER III: WORDS SET IN CLAY Pylos Mycenean City Names in the Iliad Linear B Deciphered The Mycenean Dialect The Greek Pantheon Cadmus CHAPTER IV: A GAP CLOSED Seismology and Chronology A Gap Closed Celestial Events in the Iliad Competing for a Greater Antiquity Changes in Land and Sea Summing Up 1 A Technical Note I have been asked by the compliers of the Velikovsky archive to briefly explain the present condition of Velikovsky’s unpublished manuscript entitled The Dark Age of Greece. By contributing this explanation, I am not in any way endorsing their move to make this material available to a wider public. Velikovsky worked on the manuscript of The Dark Age of Greece fairly intensively during the last years of his life, drawing in part on the library research of Edwin Schorr, a graduate student at the University of Cincinnati, whom he employed for this pupose in Princeton for several summers in a row in the mid-seventies. Readers of Pensee know Schorr under his nom de plume Israel M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Age of Greece
    THE DARK AGE OF GREECE by Immanuel Velikovsky Unpublished – Internet [Overgenomen 2010-05-04] I. Velikovsky, The Dark Age of Greece (PDF Cor Hendriks, Dec. 2017) 1 A Technical Note I have been asked by the compliers of the Velikovsky archive to briefly explain the present condition of Velikovsky’s unpublished manuscript entitled The Dark Age of Greece. Velikovsky worked on the manuscript of The Dark Age of Greece fairly intensively during the last years of his life, drawing in part on the library research of Edwin Schorr, a graduate student at the University of Cincinnati, whom he employed for this pupose in Princeton for several summers in a row in the mid-seventies. Readers of Pensée know Schorr under his nom de plume Israel M. Isaacson, which he used to protect himself from the wrath of his professors at Cincinnati. At the time that I began to work for Velikovsky in 1976, the manuscript was still “work in progress.” While Velikovsky was writing and rewriting the main text, my task was to annotate the material, drawing in part on the voluminous notes and photocopies of articles prepared by Schorr and partly on my own research. In addition, Velikovsky and I co- authored certain sections; others, written solely by me, were to have been included in a supplement to the book. Subsequent to 1980, pursuant to Elisheva Velikovsky’s wishes, I moved some of these contributions from the main text into footnotes and removed the rest from the manuscript altogether. Several of them were published in Kronos VIII.2 in 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced to Social Studies Teachers and a Nine-Week Inicourse Designed to Investigate His Theories Is Reported
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 084 215 SO 006 643 AUTHOR Stahl, Robert J.; Ring, Mary TITLE Immanuel Velikovsky: Reconsidered. An Inquiry Unit Into Velikovsky's Revision of Ancient History. INSTITUTION Florida Univ., Gainesville. P. K. Yonge Lab. School. PUB DATE Oct 73 NOTE 37p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS *Ancient History; Course Objectives; Critical Thinking; Historical Criticism; *Inquiry Training; Instructional Materials; *Interdisciplinary Approach; Middle Eastern History; *Problem Solving; Religion; Scientific Attitudes; Secondary Education; *Social Studies; Teaching Techniques; Units of Study (Subject Fields) IDENTIFIERS Chronology; Minicourses; Primary Sources; *Velikovsky (Immanuel) ABSTRACT The ideas and theories of Isamanuel Velikovsky are introduced to social studies teachers and a nine-week inicourse designed to investigate his theories is reported. The contradictions and inconsistencies that Velikovsky found between the events as recorded in original records of the ancient Middle East and the chronological timetable of this historical period as it is presently constructed, form the basis of this inquiry unit for high school students. Four general course objectives listed and discussed are: to familiarize students with the basic works and theories of Velikovsky; to examine some of his theories in light of historical, scientific, cultural, and religious evidence and cources; to review the chronology of ancient history as presently constructed and compare it with the revisions suggested by Velikovsky; and to review the reaction of scientific and literary critics to his published works and theories. Through use of both the expository and inquiry modes of learning, the unit emphasizes the students' efforts to identify and articulate the inconsistencies which present themselves, and to make decisions to reconcile these discrepancies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Contributions of Albert Einstein to Earth Sciences
    1 Contributions of Albert Einstein to Earth Sciences: A review in Commemoration 2 of the W orld Year of Physics 3 4 Jesús Martínez-Frías1, David Hochberg1 and Fernando Rull1,2 5 6 1 Centro de Astrobiologia (CSIC/INTA), associated to the NASA Astrobiology Institute, Ctra de 7 Ajalvir, km 4, 28850 Torrejon de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain, Tel: +34-91-5201111, Fax: +34-91- 8 5201621, e-mail: martinezfrias@ mncn.csic.es 9 2 Cristalografía y Mineralogía, Facultad de Ciencias and Unidad Asociada al Centro de 10 Astrobiologia, Universidad de ValladolidœCSIC, 47006 Valladolid, Spain 11 Abstract 12 The W orld Year of Physics (2005) is an international celebration to commemorate the 13 100th anniversary of Einstein's "Annus Mirabilis". The United Nations has officially 14 declared 2005 the International Year of Physics. However, the impact of Einstein´s 15 ideas was not restricted to physics. Among numerous other disciplines, Einstein also 16 made significant and specific contributions to Earth Sciences. His geosciences-related 17 letters, comments, and scientific articles, are dispersed, not easily accessible and are 18 poorly known. The present review attempts to integrate them, as a tribute to Einstein in 19 commemoration of this centenary. These contributions can be classified into three basic 20 areas: geodynamics, geological (planetary) catastrophism and fluvial geomorphology. 21 Regarding geodynamics, Einstein essentially supported Hapgood‘s very controversial 22 theory called Earth Crust Displacement. W ith respect to geological (planetary) 23 catastrophism, it is shown how the ideas of Einstein about Velikovsky‘s proposals 24 evolved from 1946 to 1955. Finally, in relation with fluvial geodynamics, the review 25 incorporates the elegant work in which Einstein explains the formation of meandering 26 rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ages in Chaos
    Site The Velikovsky Encyclopedia Fromlogo The Velikovsky Encyclopedia Ages in Chaos Ages in Chaos is the second book by Immanuel Velikovsky, first published by Doubleday in 1952, which put forward a major revision of the history of the Ancient Near East. A second volume was due for publication shortly after this but was postponed and expanded into four volumes, two of which (Peoples of the Sea and Ramses II and his time) were published in the two years preceding his death, and two of which remain unpublished in print (The Assyrian Conquest and The Dark Age of Greece) —however the manuscripts have long been available via the http://www.varchive.org site. Contents 1 Proposals 2 Critique 3 Other chronological revisions inspired by Velikovsky 4 Footnotes 5 Literature 6 External links Proposals Velikovsky claimed in this book that the histories of Ancient Egypt and Ancient Israel are five centuries out of step. He began by claiming that the Exodus took place not, as orthodoxy has it, at some point during the New Kingdom, but at the fall of the Middle Kingdom. He identifies the Hyksos with the Biblical Amalekites, the Biblical Queen of Sheba with the Egyptian queen Hatshepsut, the Biblical Shishak king of Egypt with Pharaoh Thutmose III, and claims that the Egyptian Amarna letters from the late 18th Dynasty describe events from the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, roughly the time of King Ahab. Some specific proposals included: Synchronising the Ipuwer Papyrus, from the beginning of Egypt's Second Intermediate Period, with the Biblical Exodus. (The Ipuwer Papyrus was conventionally dated to approximately 350 years before the conventional date of the Exodus (1450 BCE)).
    [Show full text]
  • Worlds in Collision with a New Introduction by the Author
    IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKV AD E CTA $1.96 $2.26 IN CANADA WORLDS IN COLLISION WITH A NEW INTRODUCTION BY THE AUTHOR ) A A Delta Book Other books by Immanuel Velikovsky: AGES IN CHAOS OEDIPUS AND AKHNATON EARTH IN UPHEAVAL (also in a Delta edition WORLDS IN COLLISION IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY a delta book Published by Dell Publishing Co., Inc. 750 Third Avenue, hew York, N.Y.. 10017 Copyright, 1950, by Immanuel Velikovsky Delta ® TM 755118, Dell Publishing Co., Inc. AH rights reserved Reprinted by arrangement with Doubleday ir Co., Inc., New York Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 52-2250 First Delta printing— January, 1965 Manufactured in the United States of America Twelfth Printing The author gratefully acknowledges permission to quote from the following books: G. A. Dorsey, The Pawnee, Mythology, Carnegie Institution of Wash- ington, 1906; Maimonides: The Guide for the Perplexed, translated M. Fried- lander, E. P. Dutton, Inc., 1928; Clements R. Markham, The Incas of Peru, E. P. Dutton, Inc., 1910.; Shakuntala and other writings of Kalidasa, transl. A. W. Ryder, Everyman’s Library, E. P. Dutton, Inc., 1912; James Moffatt, The Bible: A New Translation, copyright, 1935, Harper & Brothers. The Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press: Homer, The Iliad, trans. A. T. Murray, 1925; Hesiod, Theogony, transl. H. Evelyn-White, 1914; Euripides, Electro, transl. A. S. Way, 1919; Plato, Timaeus, transl. R. C. Bury, 1920, and The Statesman (Politicus), transl. H. N. Fowler, 1925; Apollodorus, The Library, transl. B. Frazer, J. 1921; Seneca, Thyestes, transl. F. J. Miller, 1917; Virgil! Georgies, transl. H. R. Fairclough, 1920; Ovid, Metamorphoses, transl.
    [Show full text]
  • Velikovsky: Psychiatrist, Historian and Catastrophist
    Velikovsky: psychiatrist, historian and catastrophist JOHN D. ILES, MD Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky died on Nov. 1 7, 1979, at his home in Princeton, New Jersey, at the age of 84. In 1981, a geophysicist com- mented in the Toronto Globe & Mail: "The recent death of Imma- nuel Velikovsky brought to an end a fascinating saga of controversy, claim and counterclaim". This scholar's theories, particularly in as- tronomy, geology and archaeology, have provoked almost hysterical re- actions from some orthodox pro- fessional scientists since 1950, and since 1969 the achievements of the space age have rekindled contro- versy as a number of his startling 'advance claims' (Velikovsky him- self objected to the word 'predic- tions' as smacking of the sooth- sayer) were confirmed. Eventually, a small minority of scientists be- came convinced that his ideas de- served serious reconsideration. The tempo of claims and counterclaims makes a fascinating saga, and there is no end in sight. A biographical sketch may help to make clear what the scientific rumpus is about and how it all began. Velikovsky was born in Russia in 1895. His father, a businessman, was also a scholar of Hebrew who became involved in promoting a Jewish national home in Palestine: Immanuel Velikovsky: destined to upset the chronologic applecart and arouse after the Russian revolution, and the scientific community to a state of furious indignation. the end of World War I, he was threatened with arrest, so the fam- Kharkov and Moscow universities, of the scientific papers, and thus ily moved to the Ukraine and then gaining his MD in 1921.
    [Show full text]