DOCSLIB.ORG

“Anchor Babies,” Immigration Reform, and the Constitution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Anchor Babies,” Immigration Reform, and the Constitution FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACTS: Ashley Berke Alex McKechnie Director of Public Relations Public Relations Coordinator 215.409.6693 215.409.6895 [email protected] [email protected] “ANCHOR BABIES,” IMMIGRATION REFORM, AND THE CONSTITUTION: PANELISTS PUT THE 14 TH AMENDMENT TO THE TEST DURING THE PETER JENNINGS PROJECT AT THE NATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER Philadelphia, PA (February 14, 2011) – The National Constitution Center will be Putting the 14 th Amendment to the Test with a conversation on the hotly debated issues of immigration reform and birthright citizenship on Saturday, March 5, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. The program is part of the Center’s 2011 Peter Jennings Project for Journalists and the Constitution . Admission is FREE, but reservations are required and can be made by calling 215.409.6700 or online at www.constitutioncenter.org . Jeff Greenfield , senior political correspondent for CBS News, will facilitate this highly interactive event, featuring Jennings Project fellows who will represent various stakeholders in the immigration debate. The event also will feature a panel of distinguished guests, including John Eastman , Donald P. Kennedy Chair in Law at Chapman University School of Law; State Representative Daryl Metcalfe (R-PA/12); Jorge Mursuli , president and CEO of Democracia Ahora; the Honorable Marjorie O. Rendell ; and Cecillia Wang , Managing Attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants' Rights Project. The citizenship clause of the 14 th Amendment reads: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This language recently has come under attack by -MORE- ADD ONE/14 TH AMENDMENT those who believe that, by giving birth to "anchor babies" who automatically have American citizenship, illegal immigrants are using the 14 th Amendment to gain a legal foothold in the U.S. Putting the 14 th Amendment to the Test will explore whether the language of the 14 th Amendment should be modified, left in its present state, or reinterpreted to deny citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants. For further information on this topic, please reference the Center’s Constitutional Spotlight Series , a collection of essays that illuminates the history and constitutional relevance of current events. The series includes a piece called Birth Rights: Citizenship and the Constitution by constitutional scholar and legal journalist Linda R. Monk, J.D. This essay is currently available for download here . Jeff Greenfield is a veteran reporter of politics, media, and culture, and the senior political correspondent for CBS News. Greenfield previously spent nine years at CNN as senior analyst, where he covered primaries, conventions, presidential debates, and election nights, among other events. He was a political and media analyst for ABC News from 1983 to 1997, appearing on “Nightline” and delivering weekly commentaries for “World News Sunday.” Greenfield’s first stint at CBS was from 1979 to 1983, when he served as media commentator. His work has appeared in numerous publications, including The New York Times Magazine , Harper's and National Lampoon , and he is the author or co-author of 11 books. Dr. John C. Eastman is the Donald P. Kennedy Chair in Law at Chapman University School of Law. He previously served as the School’s Dean from June 2007 to January 2010. Eastman is the Founding Director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, a public interest law firm affiliated with the Claremont Institute. Previously, he served as the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service. Prior to joining the Chapman Law faculty in August 1999, he served as a law clerk with Justice Clarence Thomas at the Supreme Court of the United States and with Judge J. Michael Luttig at the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Eastman also practiced with the national law firm Kirkland & Ellis, specializing in major civil and constitutional litigation at both the trial and appellate levels. -MORE- ADD TWO/14 TH AMENDMENT Daryl Metcalfe , recognized by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette as the Pennsylvania General Assembly’s “No. 1 Conservative,” and a multiple-time, highest-ranking lawmaker on the Pennsylvania Liberty Index, currently is serving his seventh term in office. Metcalfe serves as the Republican Majority Chairman of the Pennsylvania House State Government Committee. During his tenure, he has been a leader on the issues of taxpayer protection, education reform, illegal immigration in Pennsylvania, protection of Second Amendment freedoms, outlawing teacher strikes, and the Right to Work law. Other legislative initiatives include proposals to completely eliminate property taxes in the Commonwealth and requiring voter referendum for any and all future local tax increases. Prior to his election, Metcalfe was employed with Dade Behring (formerly DuPont Diagnostics) for 13 years as a field engineer, where he was responsible for managing a biomedical service territory in western Pennsylvania. Metcalfe attended Kansas State University while serving in the United States Army at Fort Riley in Kansas. Jorge Mursuli emigrated from Cuba to Brooklyn, New York in 1967. Under his leadership, Democracia Ahora has grown to be one of the most effective Hispanic civic engagement and leadership training organizations in the nation. Previously, Mursuli served on the Board of the Greater Miami Convention and Visitors Bureau. He is the former Chair of the Miami-Dade County Community Relations Board Task Force on Police/Community Relations. In 2001, Mursuli joined People for the American Way (PFAW) Foundation as the Florida State Director. In September 2002, PFAW, together with SAVE Dade, led the fight – and were victorious – against a repeal of the sexual orientation clause in Miami-Dade’s Human Rights Ordinance. During the 2002 and 2004 elections, Mursuli was instrumental in organizing PFAW Foundation’s Election Protection program. Mursuli received his Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Florida. He currently serves on the National Board of the League of Conservation Voters. Marjorie O. Rendell was the 43 rd First Lady of Pennsylvania, and currently serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Previously, she served as a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and as an attorney with the law firm of Duane, Morris & Heckscher LLP, where she became the firm’s second -MORE- ADD THREE/14 TH AMENDMENT woman partner. Rendell is a Fellow of the American College of Bankruptcy, an inaugural member and Master of the Villanova University School of Law J. Willard O’Brien Inn of Court, an elected member of The American Law Institute, and a member of the American Bankruptcy Institute, the Federal Judges Association, the American Judicature Society, and the National Association of Women Judges. Cecillia Wang is the Managing Attorney for the California office of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants' Rights Project, which focuses on the intersection of immigration and criminal law and the impact of U.S. national security policies on non- citizens. Wang began her career at the Immigrants’ Rights Project as a fellow in 1997- 98 and rejoined the Project in 2004 after working at the federal public defender office for the Southern District of New York. From 2002 to 2004, she was appointed to the Criminal Justice Act indigent defense panel for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Previously, Wang served as a clerk for Judge William Norris of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and Justice Harry Blackmun of the Supreme Court of the United States. The 2011 Peter Jennings Project for Journalists and the Constitution will take place from March 4 through March 6, 2011. Named in honor of the late, award-winning news anchor and friend of the National Constitution Center, the Peter Jennings Project allows professional journalists from print, broadcast, and online media organizations, as well as a select group of collegiate journalists from across the country, to examine the constitutional dimension in the news today and acquire a deeper understanding of the Constitution and its important role in the lives of all Americans. Kayce Freed Jennings , wife of Peter Jennings, serves on the board of the project, and veteran journalist Todd Brewster , who worked closely with Jennings and co-authored two books with him, is the program director. The Peter Jennings Project for Journalists and the Constitution is made possible through the generosity of The Annenberg Foundation. -MORE- ADD FOUR/14 TH AMENDMENT The National Constitution Center, located at 525 Arch St. on Philadelphia’s Independence Mall, is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to increasing public understanding of the U.S. Constitution and the ideas and values it represents. The Center serves as a museum, an education center, and a forum for debate on constitutional issues. The museum dramatically tells the story of the Constitution from Revolutionary times to the present through more than 100 interactive, multimedia exhibits, film, photographs, text, sculpture and artifacts, and features a powerful, award-winning theatrical performance, “Freedom Rising.” The Center also houses the Annenberg Center for Education and Outreach, which serves as the hub for national constitutional education. Also, as a nonpartisan forum for constitutional discourse, the Center presents – without endorsement – programs that contain diverse viewpoints on a broad range of issues. For more information, call 215.409.6700 or visit www.constitutioncenter.org . ### .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jeff Greenfield
    Jeff Greenfield Political Analyst One of America’s most respected political analysts, Jeff Greenfield has spent more than 30 years on network television, including CNN, ABC News, CBS, and as an anchor on PBS’ Need to Know. A five-time Emmy Award-winner, he is known for his quick wit and savvy insight into politics, history, the media and current events. Twice he was named to TV Guide‘s All-Star News “Dream Team” as best political commentator and was cited by the Washington Journalism Review as “the best in the business” for his media analysis. Greenfield has served as anchor booth analyst or floor reporter for every national political convention since 1988 and reported on virtually every important domestic political story in recent decades. He looks at American political history "through a fictional looking glass" in his national bestseller, Then Everything Changed: Stunning Alternate Histories of American Politics -- JFK, RFK, Carter, Ford, Reagan, released to great acclaim in March 2011. The New York Times called it "shrewdly written, often riveting." A follow-up e-book, 43*: When Gore Beat Bush—A Political Fable, was published in September 2012, and his latest, If Kennedy Lived: The First and Second Terms of President John F. Kennedy: An Alternate History, was released in October 2013. A former speechwriter for Robert F. Kennedy, Greenfield has authored or co-authored 12 books including national bestselling novel The People’s Choice, The Real Campaign, and Oh, Waiter! One Order of Crow!, an insider account of the contested 2000 presidential election. From 1998-2007 Greenfield was a senior analyst for CNN, serving as lead analyst for its coverage of the primaries, conventions, presidential debates and election nights.
    [Show full text]
  • Media in the Lives of 8-18 Year-Olds, The
    March 9, 2005 9:30 a.m. Presentation: Key Findings from New Research on Children’s Media Use Vicky Rideout, vice president and director, Program for the Study of Entertainment Media and Health, Kaiser Family Foundation 9:50 a.m. Roundtable Discussion Common, Grammy award winning Hip Hop artist Michael J. Copps, commissioner, Federal Communications Commission Jordan Levin, former CEO, The WB Television Network Donald Roberts, author, It’s Not Only Rock and Roll and professor of communication, Stanford University Juliet Schor, author, Born to Buy and professor of sociology, Boston College Alain Tascan, vice president and general manager, Electronic Arts Montreal Moderator: Jeff Greenfield, senior political analyst, CNN 10:50 a.m. Remarks Drew Altman, Ph.D., president and CEO, Kaiser Family Foundation 11:00 a.m. Keynote Address The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton, United States Senator 11:30 a.m. Questions and Answers Speaker Biographies and Contact Information March 9, 2005 DREW ALTMAN, PH.D. President and CEO Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation 2400 Sand Hill Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Phone: 650-854-9400 Drew Altman is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. One of the nation's largest private foundations devoted to health, the Foundation is a leading independent voice and source of research and information on health care in the United States. Since 1987, the Foundation has also operated a major program supporting efforts to develop a more equitable health system in South Africa. In 1991, Dr. Altman directed a complete overhaul of the Foundation’s mission and operating style, leading to the Foundation’s standing today as a leader in health policy and communications.
    [Show full text]
  • For August 1, 2010, CBS
    Page 1 26 of 1000 DOCUMENTS CBS News Transcripts August 1, 2010 Sunday SHOW: CBS EVENING NEWS, SUNDAY EDITION 6:00 PM EST For August 1, 2010, CBS BYLINE: Russ Mitchell, Don Teague, Sharyl Attkisson, Seth Doane, Elaine Quijano GUESTS: Richard Haass SECTION: NEWS; International LENGTH: 2451 words HIGHLIGHT: On day 104 of the Gulf oil spill, news that a key step to seal the well could begin Tuesday as evidence mounts that B.P. used too many chemical dispersants to clean up the Gulf. President Obama may not be welcome on the campaign trail this fall as Democratic candidates fight to win their seats. Worries of drug violence in Mexico could spill over the border to the U.S. as National Guard`s troops get set to beef up border security. RUSS MITCHELL, CBS NEWS ANCHOR: Tonight on day 104 of the Gulf oil spill, news that a key step to seal the well could begin Tuesday as evidence mounts that B.P. used too many chemical dispersants to clean up the Gulf. I`m Russ Mitchell. Also tonight, campaign concerns. Why President Obama may not be welcome on the campaign trail this fall as Democratic candidates fight to win their seats. Border patrol, worries of drug violence in Mexico could spill over the border to the U.S. as National Guard`s troops get set to beef up border security. And just married, an inside account of the wedding yesterday of Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky. And good evening. It is shaping up to be a very important week in the Gulf oil spill.
    [Show full text]
  • A Legacy Diminished: President Obama and the Courts
    Br. J. Am. Leg. Studies 8 (Special Issue) (2019), DOI: 10.2478/bjals-2019-0008 A Legacy Diminished: President Obama and the Courts Clodagh Harrington* Alex Waddan** ABSTRACT A central concern for any U.S. presidential administration is its relationship with the federal judiciary. For an administration, this relationship is potentially legacy making or breaking in two ways. First, what is the imprint that the administration leaves on the judiciary? Will a president have the opportunities and institutional capacity to change the political balance of the federal judiciary? Second, how will the judicial branch respond when the administration’s policy plans are, as many inevitably will be, challenged in the court system? Will the administration’s policy preferences be preserved and its agenda advanced, or will court decisions stymie important initiatives and restrict that agenda? This paper examines these questions with regard to the Obama administration’s record. The Obama era saw new levels of diversity in terms of judicial nominees and the courts did sometimes uphold key aspects of the Obama administration’s program to the chagrin of conservative opponents. Yet, with the benefit of two years hindsight, the evidence suggests that the Obama administration’s legacy with regard to both the central questions addressed in the paper was a diminished one. The administration’s capacity to reorient the federal bench was thwarted by the legislative branch, notably obstruction in Senate, with the consequences of that frustration highlighted by the rapid actions taken by the Trump administration and Senate Republicans in 2017-18. Furthermore, on balance, the decisions made by the federal judiciary on matters of significant concern to the Obama White House weakened rather than strengthened the administration’s legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Third-Party and Independent Presidential Candidates: the Need for a Runoff Mechanism
    THIRD-PARTY AND INDEPENDENT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES: THE NEED FOR A RUNOFF MECHANISM Edward B. Foley* INTRODUCTION The 2016 presidential election has been like no other. However it ends up, it has been marked by the singularly dispiriting fact that the two major party nominees have the highest unfavorable ratings of any presidential candidates in history.1 This environment, one would think, would be particularly auspicious for a third-party or independent candidate, but the electoral system is structured in a way that is so disadvantageous to any candidate other than the two major-party nominees that a serious third-party or independent challenger has yet to materialize. To be sure, as of this writing, the Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson is polling significantly higher than any third-party or independent candidate since Ross Perot.2 Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, is also hovering * Director, Election Law @ Moritz, and Charles W. Ebersold and Florence Whitcomb Ebersold Chair in Constitutional Law, the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. A much different version of this paper was presented at an Ohio State Democracy Studies workshop. I very much appreciate the extensive and constructive feedback I received from participants there, as well as from Deborah Beim, Barry Burden, Bruce Cain, Frank Fukuyama, Bernie Grofman, Eitan Hersh, Alex Keyssar, Nick Stephanopoulos, Rob Richie, and Charles Stewart. This Article is part of a forum entitled Election Law and the Presidency held at Fordham University School of Law. 1. See, e.g., Philip Rucker, These ‘Walmart Moms’ Say They Feel ‘Nauseated’ by the Choice of Clinton or Trump, WASH.
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Life Is It Anyway: a Proposal to Redistribute Some of the Economic Benefits of Cameras in the Courtroom from Broadcasters to Crime Victims
    South Carolina Law Review Volume 49 Issue 1 Article 3 Fall 1997 Whose Life Is It Anyway: A Proposal to Redistribute Some of the Economic Benefits of Cameras in the Courtroom from Broadcasters to Crime Victims Stephen D. Easton Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Easton, Stephen D. (1997) "Whose Life Is It Anyway: A Proposal to Redistribute Some of the Economic Benefits of Cameras in the Courtroom from Broadcasters to Crime Victims," South Carolina Law Review: Vol. 49 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr/vol49/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you by the Law Reviews and Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in South Carolina Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Easton: Whose Life Is It Anyway: A Proposal to Redistribute Some of the E SOUTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 49 FALL 1997 NUMBER 1 WHOSE LIFE Is IT ANYWAY?: A PROPOSAL TO REDISTRIBUTE SOME OF THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM FROM BROADCASTERS TO CRIME VICTIMS STEPHEN D. EASTON* I. INTRODUCTION ................................. 2 II. CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM ....................... 7 A. Cameras in Courtrooms:A Brief HistoricalPerspective ...... 8 1. The Pre-Television Era ....................... 8 2. ABA Canon 35 ............................ 9 3. Three States Allow Cameras..................... 10 4. Estes v. Texas: The United States Supreme Court Speaks 11 5. The FloridaExperiment ..................... 12 6. Chandler v. Florida: The Supreme Court Speaks Again . 12 7. The Few Become the Many ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Hannah Arendt and the Dark Public Sphere
    Hannah Arendt and the Dark Public Sphere John LeJeune PhD, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Department of History and Political Science, Georgia Southwestern State University Address: Georgia Southwestern State University Drive, 800, Americus, GA 31709 E-mail: [email protected] Hannah Arendt once described “dark times” as characterized by “‘credibility gaps’ and ‘invis- ible government,’ by speech that does not disclose what is but sweeps it under the carpet, by exhortations, moral and otherwise, that, under the pretext of upholding old truths, degrade all truth to meaningless triviality.” This paper argues that as Western democracies experience conditions that echo Arendt’s twentieth century assessment — among these are the death of truth, the decline of civility, and the dearth of authenticity in the public sphere — Arendt’s work helps us better understand two sources of this modern crisis. First is the blurring of truth and opinion in contemporary political discourse; second is the blurring of the public and private realms made possible by the coercive intermediation of the social. An acute danger of these circumstances is the lure of demagogues and extreme ideologies when the words and deeds of the public realm — either because they are not believed, or because they have been reduced to mere image-making — increasingly lack meaning, integrity, and spontaneity. A second danger is the erosion of faith in the free press (and with it our common world and basic facts) when the press itself, reacting to its own sense of darkness, undermines its role of truthteller by assuming the role of political actor. In the end I suggest that underlying these several acute issues of democracy lies a more basic tension in the public sphere centered on an Arendtian notion of “freedom of opinion.” Keywords: Hannah Arendt, public sphere, free press, lying, fake news, social realm Election 2016: Crises of Democracy The 2016 election of Donald Trump as US President signaled to many a crisis of Ameri- can democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • From Silicon Valley to CNN
    Advancing Professor Buzz Thompson ’76 Exposing International Criminal Law A New Path for the Environment Guantanamo Abuses WINTER 2006 Stanford Lawyer From Silicon Valley to CNN Entrepreneur and Political Commentator Carlos Watson ’95 Has Done It All CONTENTS WINTER 2006 VOL. 40 NO. 2 COVER STORY BRIEFS 16 FROM SILICON 6 LAWYER OF THE YEAR VALLEY TO CNN Barbara Olshansky ’85, defender of Carlos Watson ’95 cofounded, U.S. detainees, wins award. led, and eventually sold a success- ful Silicon Valley startup. Now a 8 REMEMBERING FORMER DEAN regular contributor on CNN, he Longtime professor and former act- provides political commentary, ing dean John R. McDonough dies. writes a column, and occasionally hosts his own interview show. 9 NEW CLINICAL CENTER The law school celebrates the open- ing of its new Clinical Center. FEATURES 10 MILITARY PROTEST 13 ALUMNI WEEKEND Students and faculty demonstrate Under a beautiful blue sky, more when JAG recruiters visit campus. than 650 alumni, family, and friends gathered to renew friend- 11 HURRICANE RELIEF ships, hear stimulating panel The law school opens its doors to discussions, cheer on the football students from Tulane University. team, and celebrate an association with Stanford Law School. DISCOVERY 16 22 FORGING A NEW PATH FOR THE 30 SEEKING MORE GOODLY CREATURES ENVIRONMENT Professor Hank Greely explores the As codirector of the Stanford implications of genetic and repro- Institute for the Environment, ductive technologies that may allow law professor Buzz Thompson us to create “enhanced” children. JD/MBA ’76 (BA ’72) is bringing together lawyers, biologists, geo- 35 A CONVERSATION WITH PROFESSOR physicists, economists, and other JENNY S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of 24-Hour Television News on American Democracy and the Daily Show As a Counterbalance to 24-Hour News: a History
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2010 The Effect of 24-Hour Television News on American Democracy and The Daily Show as a Counterbalance to 24-Hour News: A History Thomas W. Queen College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Queen, Thomas W., "The Effect of 24-Hour Television News on American Democracy and The Daily Show as a Counterbalance to 24-Hour News: A History" (2010). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 669. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/669 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Effect of 24-Hour Television News on American Democracy & The Daily Show as a Counterbalance to 24-Hour News ◊ A History BY Thomas Queen Copyright © 2010 by Thomas Queen All rights reserved. ii Contents Acknowledgements iv Preface 1 ONE Media in America 4 TWO The Election that Went Awry 24 THREE The Longer than Expected War 57 FOUR De Tocqueville’s Reef 99 Notes 109 Bibliography 119 iii Acknowledgements To my parents, who in middle school let me stay up to watch The Daily Show; to my professors, who finally got me to avoid passive voice; to my friends, who heard more about this project than they probably cared but listened anyway: thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • 1ROBERT F. KENNEDY, “STATEMENT on the DEATH of REVEREND MARTIN LUTHER KING, RALLY in INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA” (4 APRIL 1968) and ROBERT F
    Voices of Democracy 11 (2016): 1-24 Drury and Crouch 1 1ROBERT F. KENNEDY, “STATEMENT ON THE DEATH OF REVEREND MARTIN LUTHER KING, RALLY IN INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA” (4 APRIL 1968) and ROBERT F. KENNEDY, “REMARKS AT THE CLEVELAND CITY CLUB” (5 APRIL 1968) Jeffrey P. Mehltretter Drury and Cole A. Crouch Wabash College Abstract: Following the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., Robert F. Kennedy delivered two speeches—a highly praised impromptu speech in Indianapolis and a less renowned exhortation in Cleveland—making sense of the death and condemning the tolerance and endless acts of violence in America. This essay analyzes Kennedy’s speeches as examples of prophetic rhetoric that accused the nation of sins and offered wisdom and justice as the path to redemption. Keywords: Robert F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., Indianapolis, Cleveland, 1968 presidential election, prophetic rhetoric, ultimate terms, exhortation Robert F. Kennedy frequently ended his stump speeches during the 1968 presidential campaign by quoting George Bernard Shaw: “Some people see things as they are and say why? I dream things that never were and say, why not?” When Kennedy was assassinated in June of that year, his younger brother, Ted, immortalized this quotation by using it to conclude the eulogy of his late brother. It was a fitting tribute given Bobby’s focus on the future and his effort to, as indicated in the title of his 1967 book, “seek a newer world.”1And yet Kennedy waded deeply in the present world, confronting injustice, prejudice, poverty, and violence through a journey of self- and other-awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • White Backlash in a Brown Country
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 50 Number 1 Fall 2015 pp.89-132 Fall 2015 White Backlash in a Brown Country Terry Smith DePaul University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Terry Smith, White Backlash in a Brown Country, 50 Val. U. L. Rev. 89 (2015). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol50/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Smith: White Backlash in a Brown Country Lecture WHITE BACKLASH IN A BROWN COUNTRY Terry Smith I would like to honestly say to you that the white backlash is merely a new name for an old phenomenon . It may well be that shouts of Black Power and riots in Watts and the Harlems and the other areas, are the consequences of the white backlash rather than the cause of them.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 90 II. PRIVILEGE AS ADDICTION, DEMOGRAPHY AS THREAT: EXPLAINING THE ETIOLOGY OF BACKLASH ........................................................................... 94 III. BACKLASH AND THE REVIVIFICATION OF CLASSICAL RACISM ............... 105 A. A Creeping “New White Nationalism?” .................................................. 106 B. The Othering of a President ...................................................................... 113 IV. WHITE BACKLASH AT THE BALLOT BOX: THE FIRE NEXT TIME ............ 117 A. From Inevitability to Backlash: Fallacies, Fears, and Suppression .......... 118 1. (Mis)Counting on Latinos ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HENRY ELLIOT WEINSTEIN University of California, Irvine
    HENRY ELLIOT WEINSTEIN University of California, Irvine, School of Law 401 East Peltason Dr., Room 3500G Irvine, Ca. 92697-8000 Office: 949-824-3642 Mobile: 323-445-7006 Fax: 949-824-2808 [email protected] March 1, 2016 PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS -Professor of the Practice of Law, School of Law, University of California, Irvine, (2008- present). -Senior Lecturer, with Security of Employment, Department of English, UC Irvine (2008- present). - Los Angeles Times (1978-2008). Legal Affairs Writer, 1993-2008; Staff writer, 1989-93; Labor Writer, 1982-89; Staff Writer, 1978-82. -Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Southern California Law School, 2004. -Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Southern California Law School, 2002. -Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Southern California Law School, 2000. -Staff Reporter, San Francisco Examiner, 1976-78. -San Francisco Bureau Stringer, New York Times, 1973-76. -Press Secretary, California Delegation to the Democratic National Convention, 1972. -Northern California Press Secretary, McGovern for President, 1972. -Staff Writer, Wall Street Journal, San Francisco bureau, 1969-71. EDUCATION -University of California, Berkeley, B.A, History, 1966. Senior Thesis: ``You Can’t Weave Cloth with Bayonets,’’ a study of the 1912 textile strike in Lawrence, Mass. -Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley, J.D., 1969. -Summer postgraduate program in state and local government, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 1981. -Between 1998 and 2000, I participated in a 2.5 year study of indigent defense issues co- sponsored by Harvard Law School and Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. LICENSURES AND CERTIFICATIONS Member of the California Bar WRITING BACKGROUND During my career as a journalist, I have written more than 3,000 stories and done reporting on the ground in 36 states plus the District of Columbia and Canada.
    [Show full text]