Advancements Through Prizes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advancements Through Prizes Advancements through Prizes William Pomerantz Director of Space Projects X PRIZE Foundation X PRIZE FoundationX PRIZE FoundaNIAC Annualtion MeetingNI –AC October Annual 17, Me 2006eting – October 17, 2006 1 OUTLINE • Prize History • ANSARI X PRIZE • Wirefly X PRIZE Cup • NG – Lunar Lander Challenge • Future Prizes X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 2 Orteig Prize • Original ANSARI X PRIZE was largely inspired by the Orteig Prize, a $25K aviation prize offered in 1919 and won in 1927 by Charles Lindbergh – About $280K in current dollars • Charles Nungesser, René Fonck, Hubert Fauntleroy Julian, Francois Coli, … and Lindbergh? X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 3 Orteig Prize • 9 teams spent $400,000 (about $4.5 million today) – or 16 times the prize value • Within eight months of Lindbergh’s flight… – the number of airplanes in the U.S. quadrupled, – the number of pilots tripled – the number of individuals buying airline tickets increased 30-fold, from 5,700 to nearly 180,000. • Aviation today is a multi-trillion dollar industry and a vital component of the global economy X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 4 Other Noteworthy Prizes • Longitude Prize • Kremer Prize • DARPA Grand Challenges • $30M Super Efficient Refrigerator Prize • 100,000-Franc Soda Alkali Prize • Feynman nano-tech prizes – working electric motor 1/64 inch – written text at 1/25,000 scale X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 5 ANSARI X PRIZE • $10M prize for – Privately funded spacecraft – 100km – 3 people (or weight equivalent) – Repeated flights • 26 teams • 7 countries • $100M + spent X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 6 ANSARI X PRIZE • Technological advances • Regulatory reform • Legitimization • Hero Creation X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 7 Wirefly X PRIZE Cup X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 8 2005 Countdown to the Cup • 10,000+ people • Flights from XCOR, Armadillo • Test Firing by Starchaser • Static Displays, mock-ups, etc • Dominated regulatory talk at the COMSTAC meetings • Intense involvement from FAA Staff X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 9 2006 Wirefly X PRIZE Cup • Friday-Saturday, October 20-21 • Las Cruces International Airport, NM • International Personal Spaceflight Symposium (Tuesday- Wednesday) • Executive Summit (Thursday) • Education Day on Friday X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 10 2006 Wirefly X PRIZE Cup • Connect personally with the industry • Meet engineers, entrepreneurs, leaders, investors, competitors, and customers • See high powered rockets, static fires, fly-bys • Talks by astronauts X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 11 Elevator Games • Two NASA Centennial Challenges • Offered by the Spaceward Foundation, hosted by the Wirefly X PRIZE Cup • $200K Tether Competition • $200K Beam Power Competition X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 12 Northrop Grumman LLC • $2M in prizes provided by NASA • Sponsored by Northrop Grumman Corp • 4 registered teams this year • Money left on the table this year will be available at next year’s Cup X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 13 Prize Rules – NGLLC • Vertical Take-Off and Landing rocketry • 25kg payload • Two flights in 150 minutes—including preparation time • Level One – 90 second flight times • Level Two – 180 second flight times – Simulated Lunar Surface X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 14 Lunar Landings - NGLLC X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 15 Northrop Grumman LLC 50 45 40 s 35 eam T ed 30 est r e 25 t n I f 20 o er b 15 m u N 10 5 0 2/1/06 2/15/06 3/1/06 3/15/06 3/29/06 4/12/06 4/26/06 5/10/06 5/24/06 6/7/06 Date X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 16 Northrop Grumman LLC • Designed to be a multi-year prize; this year’s competition is the debut of the event • Many potential competitors attending this year to observe, recruit partners • Many regulatory hurdles cleared this year, lowering the barriers for next year • Prize announcement: May 5, 2006 – 168 days between announcement and competition X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 17 NGLLC Teams: Acuity • Aerospace development company based in Menlo Park, CA • Producer of UAVs and other experimental aircraft • First venture into rocketry X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 18 NGLLC Teams: Armadillo • Original ANSARI X PRIZE team • No paid employees • Two day a week labor • “Build it, test it, fly it” philosophy X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 19 NGLLC Teams: Masten • 6 full time employees • Moved from Mountainview, CA to Mojave, CA to better pursue this Challenge • Also offering $99 CanSat program • Working towards manned orbital vehicle X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 20 NGLLC Teams: Micro-Space • Original ANSARI X PRIZE Competitor • 4 employees • Based out of Denver, CO • Background in amateur rocketry • “Spartan” designs X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 21 NGLLC - Video X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 22 Archon X PRIZE for Genomics • $10M prize • Sequence 100 human genomes • 10 days or less • ≤1 error per 10,000 bases sequenced • Cover at least 98% of the genome • Recurring cost of ≤$10,000 per genome X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 23 Archon X PRIZE for Genomics • Support from both public and private teams from original Human Genome project • Holds the key to truly preventative medicine • Prize winning team will also sequence the “Genome 100” – Stephen Hawking, Burt Rutan, Larry Page, Anousheh Ansari, Paul Allen, Larry King… X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 24 Future Prizes – Where Next? • We conquered the Kármán line • Working on the Human Genome • Working on fuel efficiency and climate change • Turning our eyes back to space X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 25 Next Stop: the Moon? • Suborbital market has already been jumpstarted; and orbital tourism already has a track record • NASA has been charged with going back to the moon, and is beginning a strong program of lunar exploration • Is the moon a good goal for the next X PRIZE? X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 26 Lunar X PRIZE : BlastOff! • Entertainment and Media- driven business model • Missions sending multiple rovers to Apollo sites • Lunar Olympics with competitions between different national teams • Technology Demonstrations to create saleable legacy hardware X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 27 Lunar X PRIZE : BlastOff! • Raised and spent over $15M from 2000-2002 • Launch procured • Mission cost estimates of $50M for 1st and $20M for 2nd • Projected Revenues of $250M X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 28 Lunar X PRIZE : Other Proofs • LunaCorp – Planned 440-pound (200- Kg) rover, with night-time operation – Signed $1M sponsorship deal with RadioShack – Partnership with Carnegie Mellon University • Transorbital – Planned orbiter, with follow-on landers – Partnership with HP X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 29 Lunar X PRIZE • In Summer 2006, XPF conducted a study built around an industry survey of CEO level individuals from industry, academia, and government • General consensus a the Lunar X Prize would be worth its cost as a PR tool alone, on top of any engineering, science, or industry building benefits • Great interest and enthusiasm among potential competitors as well as potential financiers • NASA could play a key role both by legitimizing teams and by demonstrating a “with us, not against us” attitude towards private enterprise X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 30 Lunar X PRIZE : Feasibility When asked about a Lunar X PRIZE with a total prize purse of $20M Feasibility without NASA launch Feasibility with NASA launch support support Mission 1 All respondents assumed feasible with or without NASA launch support Mission 2 70 % of respondent assumed 90 % of respondent assumed such a such a mission is feasible without mission is feasible with NASA launch NASA launch support support Mission 3 70 % of respondent assumed 80% of respondent assumed such a such a mission is feasible without mission is feasible with NASA launch NASA launch support support Mission 1: Simple lander, survives for ~2 weeks, no location specified Mission 2: Rover returning video of an Apollo landing site Mission 3: Targeted lander carrying payload to South Pole X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 31 Lunar X PRIZE : Teams & Time When asked about a Lunar X PRIZE with a total prize purse of $20M # of Serious US- Likely mission victory # of Serious Likely mission victory based Teams, date, relative to US-based date, relative to with no launch announcement, without Teams, with announcement, with support launch support launch support launch support Mission 1 5 (σ =2.3) 3 years (σ =1) 7 (σ =2.5) 3.4 years (σ =1.8) Mission 2 3 (σ =2.6) 4 years (σ = 1.7) 4 (σ =3.1) 3.7 years (σ =2) Mission 3 2 (σ =2) 3.7 years (σ = 1.2) 3 (σ =2.4) 4.5 years (σ =2.1) Mission 1: Simple lander, survives for ~2 weeks, no location specified Mission 2: Rover returning video of an Apollo landing site Mission 3: Targeted lander carrying payload to South Pole X PRIZE Foundation NIAC Annual Meeting – October 17, 2006 32
Recommended publications
  • Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports
    Commercial Space Transportation 2006 Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports January 2006 HQ003606.INDD 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts About FAA/AST About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encour- age, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation i About FAA/AST 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts Contents Table of Contents Introduction . .1 Significant 2005 Events . .4 Space Competitions . .6 Expendable Launch Vehicles . .9 Current Expendable Launch Vehicle Systems . .9 Atlas 5 - Lockheed Martin Corporation .
    [Show full text]
  • Industry at the Edge of Space Other Springer-Praxis Books of Related Interest by Erik Seedhouse
    IndustryIndustry atat thethe EdgeEdge ofof SpaceSpace ERIK SEEDHOUSE S u b o r b i t a l Industry at the Edge of Space Other Springer-Praxis books of related interest by Erik Seedhouse Tourists in Space: A Practical Guide 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-74643-2 Lunar Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on the Moon 2008 ISBN: 978-0-387-09746-6 Martian Outpost: The Challenges of Establishing a Human Settlement on Mars 2009 ISBN: 978-0-387-98190-1 The New Space Race: China vs. the United States 2009 ISBN: 978-1-4419-0879-7 Prepare for Launch: The Astronaut Training Process 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-1349-4 Ocean Outpost: The Future of Humans Living Underwater 2010 ISBN: 978-1-4419-6356-7 Trailblazing Medicine: Sustaining Explorers During Interplanetary Missions 2011 ISBN: 978-1-4419-7828-8 Interplanetary Outpost: The Human and Technological Challenges of Exploring the Outer Planets 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4419-9747-0 Astronauts for Hire: The Emergence of a Commercial Astronaut Corps 2012 ISBN: 978-1-4614-0519-1 Pulling G: Human Responses to High and Low Gravity 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-3029-2 SpaceX: Making Commercial Spacefl ight a Reality 2013 ISBN: 978-1-4614-5513-4 E r i k S e e d h o u s e Suborbital Industry at the Edge of Space Dr Erik Seedhouse, M.Med.Sc., Ph.D., FBIS Milton Ontario Canada SPRINGER-PRAXIS BOOKS IN SPACE EXPLORATION ISBN 978-3-319-03484-3 ISBN 978-3-319-03485-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03485-0 Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013956603 © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Centennial Challenge for 3D-Printed Habitat
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180006397 2019-08-31T18:36:43+00:00Z NASA’s Centennial Challenge for 3D-Printed Habitat: Phase II Outcomes and Phase III Competition Overview Prater, T.J.1, T. Kim2, M. Roman2, R. Mueller3 1NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Materials and Processes Laboratory 2NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Centennial Challenges Program Office 3NASA, Kennedy Space Center, Senior Technologist The 3D-Printed Habitat Challenge is part of NASA’s Centennial Challenges Program. NASA’s Centennial Challenges seek to accelerate innovation in aerospace technology development through public competitions. The 3D-Printed Habitat Challenge, launched in 2015, is part of the Centennial Challenges portfolio and focuses on habitat design and development of large-scale additive construction systems capable of fabricating structures from in situ materials and/or mission recyclables. The challenge is a partnership between NASA, Caterpillar (primary sponsor), Bechtel, Brick and Mortar Ventures, and Bradley University. Phase I of the challenge was an architectural concept competition in which participants generated conceptual renderings of habitats on Mars which could be constructed using locally available resources. Phase II asked teams to develop the printing systems and material formulations needed to translate these designs into reality. Work under the phase II competition, which concluded in August 2017 with a head to head competition at Caterpillar’s Edward Demonstration Facility in Peoria, Illinois, is discussed, including the key technology development outcomes resulting from this portion of the competition. The phase III competition consists of both virtual and construction subcompetitions. Virtual construction asks teams to render high fidelity architectural models of a habitat and all the accompanying information required for construction of the pressure retaining and load bearing portions of the structure.
    [Show full text]
  • BMT GLXP Barcelona Moon Team @ Google Lunar X PRIZE
    BMT GLXP Barcelona Moon Team @ Google Lunar X PRIZE Outreach PR008 Press Brochure ENG Date: 2013-01-21 Type: Outreach Reference: BMT-Press_Brochure-v08-ENG Status: Version: Issue 1 Rev8 BARCELONA MOON TEAM | GALACTICSUITE MOONRACE SL | C/Pellaires 30-38 Nau G1 08019 Barcelona SPAIN T+34 933 037 027 F+34 933 034 665 0. OVERVIEW 4 1. OBJECTIVE: THE MOON AS A SOURCE FOR ENERGY SOLUTIONS. 4 2. THE VISION: TO GIVE IMPULSE TO AN EMERGENT SECTOR WITH A HIGH VALUE ADDED. 6 3. GOOGLE LUNAR X PRIZE: THE OPORTUNITY 7 4. BARCELONA MOON TEAM: THE CHALLENGE 8 4.1. OVERVIEW 8 4.2. LEADERSHIP 9 4.3. TEAM 9 4.3.1. Xavier Claramunt 9 4.3.2. Marc Zaballa 9 4.3.3. Carlos García 9 4.3.4. Juan de Dalmau 10 4.3.5. Ed Chester 10 4.3.6. Alfonso Martínez 10 4.3.7. Josep Amat 10 4.3.8. Ignasi Casanova 11 4.3.9. Pablo Colmenarejo 11 4.3.10. Alfonso Martínez 11 4.3.11. Alfonso Martínez 11 4.3.12. Rafael Harillo 11 4.4. FOUNDATION FOR SPACE AND LUNAR EXPLORATION (FEEL) 12 4.5. PARTNERS 13 4.5.1. Galactic Suite 13 4.5.2. Center of Aerospace Technology (CTAE) 13 4.5.3. Altran Technologies 13 4.5.4. Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) 13 4.5.5. GMV 14 4.5.6. EADS CASA ESPACIO 14 4.5.7. THALES ALENIA SPACE España 15 4.5.8. INTA 15 4.5.9. Stardust Consulting 15 4.6.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Review – Environmental Innovation Prizes for Development
    Evidence Review – Environmental Innovation Prizes for Development DEW Point Enquiry No. A0405 A Report by Bryony Everett With support from Chris Barnett and Radha Verma Peer Review by William Masters July 2011 Acknowledgements We would like to thank all the interviewees detailed in Annex 1 for their time and support in providing us with their insights and information, without which we would not have been able to produce this report. Particular thanks go to Erika, Jaison and Will. Disclaimer This report is commissioned under DEW Point, the DFID Resource Centre for Environment, Water and Sanitation, which is managed by a consortium of companies led by Harewelle International Limited1. Although the report is commissioned by DFID, the views expressed in the report are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent DFID’s own views or policies, or those of DEW Point. Comments and discussion on items related to content and opinion should be addressed to the author, via the “Contact and correspondence” address e-mail or website, as indicated in the control document above. 1 Consortium comprises Harewelle International Limited, DD International, Practical Action Consulting, Cranfield University and AEA Energy and Environment Table of Contents Evidence Review – Environmental Innovation Prizes for Development Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Technology Mission Directorate Briefing
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Technology Mission Directorate Briefing AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites Presented by: Dr. Michael Gazarik Associate Administrator, Space Technology Mission Directorate August 12, 2013 www.nasa.gov/spacetech Why Invest in Space Technology? • Enables a new class of NASA missions Addresses National Needs beyond low Earth Orbit. A generation of studies and reports • Delivers innovative solutions that (40+ since 1980) document the need dramatically improve technological for regular investment in new, capabilities for NASA and the Nation. transformative space • Develops technologies and capabilities that technologies. make NASA’s missions more affordable and more reliable. • Invests in the economy by creating markets and spurring innovation for traditional and emerging aerospace business. • Engages the brightest minds from academia in solving NASA’s tough technological challenges. Who: Value to NASA Value to the Nation The NASA Workforce Academia Industry & Small Businesses Other Government Agencies The Broader Aerospace Enterprise 2 Challenges for Deep Space Exploration Trends in Space Technology Space Technology Portfolio Early Stage Innovation Technology Technology Technology Crosscutting Game Changing Small Spacecraft Breakthroughs Demonstration Transformative & Transformative Development (ETD/CSTD) Missions (ETD/CSTD) Technologies (CSTD) Concepts/ Concepts/ Pioneering Pioneering Innovation Innovation Developing Developing Community NASA Innovative Space Technology Center Innovation
    [Show full text]
  • The Incentives and Disincentives of Innovation Prizes: a Survey of the Dropout Teams from Progressive Insurance Automotive X PRIZE
    The incentives and disincentives of innovation prizes: A survey of the dropout teams from Progressive Insurance Automotive X PRIZE by Bharat Bhushan Submitted to the System Design and Management Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management at theARCHIVES at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology OF TECHNOLO, March 2010 © 2010 Bharat Bhushan. All rights reserved. Signature of Author Bharat Bhushan System Design and Management Program Certified by Fiona Mulray, PhD Thesis Supervisor Associate Professor of Manageme t MIT Sloan School of Management and by_ rika Wagner, PhD "Thesis Supervisor X PRIZE Lab@MIT Accepted by- Patrick Director System Design and Management Program The incentives and disincentives of innovation prizes: A survey of dropouts from the Progressive Insurance Automotive X PRIZE By Bharat Bhushan Submitted to the System Design and Management Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management ABSTRACT: Technological innovation is driven by incentives. However, our understanding of how incentives actually work "on the ground" to change the level of activity of innovators or to shape the direction of their innovation is relatively limited. This thesis contributes to this understanding by focusing on innovation prizes (as applied to the energy industry). It aims to examine how prizes provide a useful but also a limiting incentive for companies in a particular arena of R&D. Specifically, the thesis involves a survey of the teams that dropped out from a highly publicized prize competition to learn about their motivations and perspectives about the competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Exploration Systems Program Overview
    Office of Exploration Systems Program Overview March 2 - 3, 2004 Associate Administrator, Office of Exploration Systems Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle (Ret.) 2004 President’s Vision for Space Exploration A New Future for U.S. Civil Space Programs • On January 14, 2004, President Bush articulated a new Vision for Space Exploration in the 21st Century • This Vision encompasses a broad range of human and robotic missions, including the Moon, Mars and destinations beyond • It establishes clear goals and objectives, but sets equally clear budgetary ‘boundaries’ by stating firm priorities and tough choices • It also establishes as policy the goals of pursuing commercial and international collaboration in realizing the new vision • Advances in Human and Robotic Technology will play a key role as enabler and major benefit of the new Vision… 2 The Vision for Space Exploration - National Benefits Key Role of Innovation and Technology… • Background – “…U.S. achievements in space…have led to the development of technologies that have widespread applications to address problems on Earth… – “In preparation for future human exploration, we must advance our ability to live and work safely in space and, at the same time develop the technologies to extend humanity’s reach to the Moon, Mars and beyond. The new technologies required for further space exploration also will improve the Nation’s other space activities and may provide applications that could be used to address problems on Earth. • Policy Objective (Technology) – “Develop the innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures both to explore and to support decisions about the destinations for human exploration… • National Benefits (Technology) – “Preparing for exploration and research accelerates the development of technologies that are important to the economy and national security.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Challenges Program
    Centennial Challenges Program Project Manager(s)/Lead(s) Sam Ortega/ZP30 (256) 544–9294 Eric Eberly/ZP30 (256) 544–2092 Sponsoring Program(s) Centennial Challenges Program Space Technology Mission Directorate Project Description NASA’s Centennial Challenges Program was initiated in 2005 to directly engage the public in the process of advanced technology development. The program offers The core of Centennial Challenges: opportunity, incentive prizes to generate revolutionary solutions to innovation, and communication. problems of interest to NASA and the nation. The pro- gram seeks innovations from diverse and nontraditional sources. Competitors are not supported by government funding and awards are only made to successful teams when the challenges are met. In keeping with the spirit of the Wright Brothers and other American innovators, the Centennial Challenge prizes are offered to independent inventors including small businesses, student groups, and individuals. These independent inventors are sought to generate innovative solutions for technical problems of interest to NASA and the nation and to provide them with the opportunity to stimulate or create new business ventures. The West Virginia University Mountaineers took home a Level 1 prize for $5,000 at the 2014 Sample Return Robot Challenge. They and one other team have also earned the right to attempt Level 2 at the 2015 event, with a potential prize purse of $1.5 million. 74 for the remaining prize money in 2015. The challenge will be competed again in June 2015. Also this year, two new challenges were announced and opened for registration. The Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) Challenge <www.nasa.gov/mavprize> is help- ing to advance the technology to return samples from a planetary surface.
    [Show full text]
  • 05, Military, Aerospace, Space & Homeland
    ------------------------------------------------------------- [コンフェレンス紹介] May 3-5, 2005 MASH '05, Military, Aerospace, Space & Homeland Security Sacramento Marriott Rancho Cordova http://www.imaps.org/mash ------------------------------------------------------------- 2005 年 4 月 28 日 19:12 WIRED NEWS (2005/04/28) NASA、量子ワイヤ研究を援助――宇宙エレベータも射程 http://hotwired.goo.ne.jp/news/20050428301.html NASA はライス大学の量子ワイヤ研究に対する$11M の資金援助 く、宇宙船軽量化やプロセッサ高速化につながる。「宇宙エレベ を発表。2010 年までに長さ 1m の電線を完成させるのが目標。カ ータ」への応用も含め、ナノチューブは人類を宇宙へと送出すの ーボン・ナノチューブで作る量子ワイヤは軽量で電気伝導度が高 に大きな役割を果たすと期待されている。 ------------------------------------------------------------- 2005 年 4 月 28 日 19:12 WIRED NEWS (2005/04/28) ロケット燃料による飲料水汚染、米国の 36 州で http://hotwired.goo.ne.jp/news/20050428305.html 米の 36 の州で、ロケット燃料や兵器の製造に使われた化学 巨額の費用がかかるため、現在米環境保護局(EPA)では強制 薬品によって、飲料水が汚染されていることが判明。浄化に 力のない安全基準しか定めていない。 ------------------------------------------------------------- 2005 年 4 月 26 日 9:28 ジェトロ 半導体パッケージングの大型投資相次ぐ(中国) 上海発 半導体製造は前工程生産能力が急成長し、最近は後工程とい 体パッケージングへの大規模投資が相次いでいる。 われる半導体パッケージング需要が高まっている。このため半導 ------------------------------------------------------------- 2005 年 4 月 25 日 9:24 ジェトロ EU 憲法条約の批准、最初のヤマ場近づく(EU) ブリュッセル発 ギリシャ議会が 4 月 19 日、EU 憲法条約を賛成多数(賛成:268 となるもので、2006 年秋ごろの発効を目指している。発効には全 票、反対:17 票)で承認し、ギリシャは EU25 ヵ国中 5 番目の批准 加盟国の批准が必要で、5 月 29 日に実施予定のフランスの国民 国となった。EU 憲法条約は EU の拡大に伴い、新たな基本条約 投票が最初のヤマ場となる。 ------------------------------------------------------------- 2005 年 4 月 22 日 19:10 WIRED NEWS (2005/04/22) 狙った相手だけに聞かせる音声伝送システムに MIT 発明賞 http://hotwired.goo.ne.jp/news/20050422301.html 米マサチューセッツ工科大学(MIT)『レメルソン
    [Show full text]
  • October 2008
    Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee COMSTAC October 30, 2008 Meeting Minutes COMSTAC Chairman Will Trafton convened the 48h meeting of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC), at 8:31 a.m. The meeting was held at Federal Aviation Administration Headquarters in Washington, DC. He welcomed members and guests and acknowledged FAA Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation Dr. George C. Nield, in the Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST). He congratulated James Van Laak as the newly-selected FAA Deputy Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation and acknowledged Hank Krakowski, Chief Operating Officer for the FAA Air Traffic Organization (ATO). Chairman Trafton announced the resignation of COMSTAC member Dr. John Logsdon in connection with his retirement from George Washington University. He acknowledged Dr. Logsdon’s outstanding contribution to the Committee during his 10- year membership. The Chairman also welcomed and introduced five new COMSTAC members, appointed by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters on August 26th: Michael Lounge, Director of Business Development, Space Exploration Division, The Boeing Company; Brett Alexander, President, Personal Space Flight Federation; Michael Gold, Corporate Counsel and Director, Washington, D.C. Area Office, Bigelow Aerospace; Peter Stier, Vice-President for Sales and Marketing, Sea Launch Company LLC; and Berin Szoka, Chairman, Space Frontier Foundation and Visiting Fellow
    [Show full text]