Mountainland MPO [PROJECT PRIORITAZION CONCEPT REPORT]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mountainland MPO [PROJECT PRIORITAZION CONCEPT REPORT] [PROJECT PRIORITAZION Mountainland MPO CONCEPT REPORT] 1.0 | Project Summary Information MPO Concept Report 1 [PROJECT PRIORITAZION Mountainland MPO CONCEPT REPORT] 2.0 | Project Scope 3.0 | Project Ranking 4.0 | Air Quality Report 5.0 | Project Cost Estimate 6.0 | Supplemental Information 1.0 | Project Summary Information 1.1 Project Name (35 letters max) Southern Utah County Park and Ride-Spanish Fork 1.2 Project Type Park and Ride ‐ New Construction 1.3 Limits (descriptions should be identifiable. i.e: intersections, place names, landmarks, 35 characters max) Parcel NE of 1100 E/Market Place Drive & 1130 N 1.4 Project Description (summary of project) Currently, UTA Bus Routes 805 from Santaquin to Provo Central Station, 821 from Payson to Provo Central Station, and Route 822 from Payson to BYU/UVU provide service to/from Spanish Fork. The project seeks to acquire three acres of land and build a bus and carpool/vanpool Park and Ride with approximately 200 stalls near the US Highway 6 interchange of I-15, allowing all three routes to service the Canyon Creek Development. Locating the Park and Ride in the Canyon Creek Development will support local commerce and development desires through increased transit connectivity as well as offer otherwise automobile commuters access to the employment center via transit. Additionally, southern Utah County automobile commuters to northern Utah County will be given a transit alternative to commute through an enhanced Park and Ride location north of Payson. 1.5 Sponsor (jurisdiction, agency name) UTA, Spanish Fork City 1.6 Project Manager Hal Johnson Office Phone 801-237-1905 Cell Phone 801-230-5751 Fax enter fax Email [email protected] 1.7 Total Project Cost (includes local match and additional funds) $3,307,000 (2019 Dollars) PE Cost $151,000 (2019 Dollars) ROW Cost $857,000 (2019 Dollars) Construction Cost $2,010,000 (2019 Dollars) Funds already available to project (less local match) $0 MPO Federal Funds Request (includes 6.77% local match) $3,307,000 (2019 Dollars, Includes $223,884 local match) 1.8 Local/Regional Significance Is project in local general plan? Supported in plan MPO Concept Report 2 [PROJECT PRIORITAZION Mountainland MPO CONCEPT REPORT] 2.0 | Project Scope Enter NA for answers to questions not applicable to your project. 2.1 Describe purpose and need of project. There is currently no official park and ride lot in Spanish Fork and Springville. The purpose of the project is to provide a centralized bus connection to the regional transit system within an area conducive to retail and commercial growth. The need for the project is to support Spanish Fork's economic growth desires for the Canyon Creek development while also giving automobile commuters to/from southern Utah County transit alternatives to driving, thus reducing vehicle emissions and improving air quality. 2.2 Describe existing service/conditions The only park and ride lot that UTA serviced in the area was a church lot that UTA used under contract. The use of the arrangement became so popular that the church did not have parking available for their smaller weekday events, and the contract was terminated. Those who parked there to ride transit are now parking on the street or at other locations in the area to board the bus. Currently, UTA Bus Route 805 from Santaquin to Provo Central Station services Spanish Fork at 600 E and 1000 N while UTA Bus Route 821 from Payson to Provo Central Station and Route 822 from Payson to BYU/UVU provide services to the city along Center Street, 800 E, and Expressway Lane. The site of the proposed Park and Ride is an unimproved lot northeast of 1100 E/Market Place Drive and 1130 N, east of the new Wal-Mart Supercenter and future Intermountain Hospital in the Canyon Creek Development of Spanish Fork. 2.3 Highway Project Information SR# or FA# N/A Beginning Mile Post N/A End Mile Post N/A Length of project N/A Existing number of Travel Lanes N/A Width of facility. N/A Facility surface type. N/A MPO Concept Report 4 [PROJECT PRIORITAZION Mountainland MPO CONCEPT REPORT] 2.4 Transit / Pedestrian Facility Project Information Route# 805/821/822 Length of project N/A What is the expected use of the facility or program? Bus and Carpool/Vanpool Park and Ride What services are provided in the operating of this project? Connection to three commuter bus routes, and a meeting place for carpool/vanpool 2.5 Describe any equipment to be purchased (buses, ITS, etc.). Bus shelters, benches, trash receptacles, signage, etc. 2.6 Describe how project is consistent with local plans. The Park and Ride is consistent with the Spanish Fork General Plan's transportation goals of providing a safe, convenient, and efficient system for transporting both people and goods and providing pleasant, safe, and functional non-motorized transportation routes. 2.7 Describe how project is consistent with Utah County ITS plan. N/A 2.8 If phased or segmented, describe how the phase has logical termini and what will future phases consist of. The lot is needed as soon as it can be constructed, so phasing is not desireable. Though it is not anticipated, if future FrontRunner park and ride lots result in this lot becoming obsolete, the site could be re-capitialized with proceeds helping construct additional improvements at FrontRunner locations. 2.9 Is project being coordinated with or constructed with a larger project? Will coordinate with Spanish Fork City in development of this area. 2.10 Describe how project will alleviate congestion on this or other facilities. The Park and Ride will give southern Utah County commuters to northern Utah County as well as those commuting to the Canyon Creek Development transit alternatives to alleviate automobile congestion on the I-15 corridor. 2.11 Describe any traffic improvements. (i.e lanes, signal coordination, ITS, turn lanes, bus pullouts, etc.) Access to the lot will be coordianted with Spanish Fork City desired traffic patterns and standards. MPO Concept Report 5 [PROJECT PRIORITAZION Mountainland MPO CONCEPT REPORT] 2.12 Describe any safety improvements for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. (i.e. raised median, channelization of turn movements, barriers, parkway strips, etc.) Park and Ride design allows for safe pedestrian, automobile, and transit interaction. It also provides a safe place for carpool/vanpool users to park their vehicles. 2.13 How are complete streets addressed with this project? (plan for pedestrians, bikes, transit, trails, ITS) N/A 2.14 Describe traffic control changes at intersections. (include info to warrant changes) Will work with Spanish Fork on any needed improvments at the connection to public streets. 2.15 What right‐of‐way is already secured? N/A 2.16 What additional right‐of‐way is needed? Just the property for the park-and-ride 2.17 Describe utility work to be performed and indicate who will do the work. Only utility work to be done is connections to service the park-and-ride lot. 2.18 What type of environmental work will most likely be needed? Categorical Exclusion 2.19 Facility Design Design Year Current Design Year w/o Click here to Conditions Improvements enter Average Daily Enter Text Enter Text Enter Text Traffic Level of Service Enter Text Enter Text Enter Text Functional Class Enter Text Enter Text Enter Text Design Speed Enter Text Enter Text Enter Text *Accident Rate Enter Text Enter Text Enter Text Transit Ridership Enter Text Enter Text Enter Text Ped/Trail Usage Enter Text Enter Text Enter Text MPO Concept Report 6 [PROJECT PRIORITAZION Mountainland MPO CONCEPT REPORT] Bus Park and Ride Unimproved Non-existant Park with paved and Ride near parcel in the parking stalls, employment center Park and Ride Canyon Creek shelters, benches, with freeway Usage Development trash receptacles, access and without without transit and signage with transit access or usage high usage usage MPO Concept Report 7 [PROJECT PRIORITAZION Mountainland MPO CONCEPT REPORT] 3.0 | Project Ranking The following categories will be used by MPO staff to score each project. The points associated with each category show what total points MPO staff can give. MPO staff’s recommendations will be made available to the MPO TAC Committee for their use in making final project selection recommendations. MPO staff ranking is a tool to aid the MPO TAC Committee in their final selection. The committee is not required to pick projects solely on MPO staff ranks. Please note, if questions pertinent to the project are not answered, zero points will be given. 3.1 Congestion Relief (25 Points) Explain if the project… a) Provides an alternate transportation facility that corrects an identified congested problem? Yes. The Park and Ride near I‐15 will allow otherwise automobile commuters to access three bus routes that connect southern and northern Utah County as well as being located in a major employment center for reverse commuters resulting in lower freeway congestion. b) Reduces congestion by reducing the number of vehicles. Yes. The Park and Ride will reduce the number of vehicles by providing transit alternatives for automobile commuters. c) Reduces the need for additional highway lanes for peak hour capacity. Yes. Each bus has a capacity of 40 seats. The average passengers per hour for a UTA bus is 26 passengers per hour. Carpool and vanpool use also directly removes vhicles from highways. d) Increases the efficiency of transportation system through traffic management measures. Bus and carpool/vanpool are Traffic Demand Management measures. e) Adds turning movements to relieve a congested intersection. N/A f) Design year number of users. Users include the average AADT for highways and users per day for transit, trails, and other projects.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix a Stations Transitioning on June 12
    APPENDIX A STATIONS TRANSITIONING ON JUNE 12 DMA CITY ST NETWORK CALLSIGN LICENSEE 1 ABILENE-SWEETWATER SWEETWATER TX ABC/CW (D KTXS-TV BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC. 2 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA NBC WALB WALB LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC 3 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA FOX WFXL BARRINGTON ALBANY LICENSE LLC 4 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ADAMS MA ABC WCDC-TV YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 5 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY NBC WNYT WNYT-TV, LLC 6 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY ABC WTEN YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 7 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY FOX WXXA-TV NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLC 8 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY PITTSFIELD MA MYTV WNYA VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC 9 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CW WCWN FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 10 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CBS WRGB FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 11 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CW KASY-TV ACME TELEVISION LICENSES OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 12 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM UNIVISION KLUZ-TV ENTRAVISION HOLDINGS, LLC 13 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM PBS KNME-TV REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF NM & BD.OF EDUC.OF CITY OF ALBUQ.,NM 14 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM ABC KOAT-TV KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. 15 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM NBC KOB-TV KOB-TV, LLC 16 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CBS KRQE LIN OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 17 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM TELEFUTURKTFQ-TV TELEFUTURA ALBUQUERQUE LLC 18 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE CARLSBAD NM ABC KOCT KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 Annually
    UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY Director of Capital Development $146,000 - $160,000 annually Utah Transit Authority provides integrated mobility solutions to service life’s connection, improve public health and enhance quality of life. • Central Corridor improvements: Expansion of the Utah Valley Express (UVX) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line to Salt Lake City; addition of a Davis County to Salt Lake City BRT line; construction of a BRT line in Ogden; and the pursuit of world class transit-oriented developments at the Point of the Mountain during the repurposing of 600 acres of the Utah State Prison after its future relocation. To learn more go to: rideuta.com VISION Provide an integrated system of innovative, accessible and efficient public transportation services that increase access to opportunities and contribute to a healthy environment for the people of the Wasatch region. THE POSITION The Director of Capital Development plays a critical ABOUT UTA role in getting things done at Utah Transit Authority UTA was founded on March 3, 1970 after residents from (UTA). This is a senior-level position reporting to the Salt Lake City and the surrounding communities of Chief Service Development Officer and is responsible Murray, Midvale, Sandy, and Bingham voted to form a for cultivating projects that improve the connectivity, public transit district. For the next 30 years, UTA provided frequency, reliability, and quality of UTA’s transit residents in the Wasatch Front with transportation in the offerings. This person oversees and manages corridor form of bus service. During this time, UTA also expanded and facility projects through environmental analysis, its operations to include express bus routes, paratransit grant funding, and design processes, then consults with service, and carpool and vanpool programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M
    Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center 2 of 142 Report No. UT‐17.XX PROVO-OREM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (TRIP) Prepared for: Utah Department of Transportation Research Division Submitted by: University of Utah, Metropolitan Research Center Authored by: Matthew M. Miller, Mercedes Beaudoin, and Reid Ewing Final Report June 2017 ______________________________________________________________________________ Provo/Orem BRT Before and After Study: Initial Conditions Report 3 of 142 DISCLAIMER The authors alone are responsible for the preparation and accuracy of the information, data, analysis, discussions, recommendations, and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, endorsements, or policies of the Utah Department of Transportation or the U.S. Department of Transportation. The Utah Department of Transportation makes no representation or warranty of any kind, and assumes no liability therefore. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors acknowledge the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for funding this research through the Utah Transportation Research Advisory Council (UTRAC). We also acknowledge the following individuals from UDOT for helping manage this research: Jeff Harris Eric Rasband Brent Schvanaveldt Jordan Backman Gracious thanks to our paid peer reviewers in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young University: Dr. Grant G. Schultz, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE. Dr. Mitsuru Saito, Ph.D, P.E., F. ASCE, F. ITE While not authors, the efforts of the following people helped make this report possible. Data Collection Proof Reading/Edits Ethan Clark Ray Debbie Weaver Thomas Cushing Clint Simkins Jack Egan Debolina Banerjee Katherine A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1991 The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915 Stephen A. Hales Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hales, Stephen A., "The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915" (1991). Theses and Dissertations. 4740. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4740 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. LZ THE EFFECT OF THE RIVALRY BETWEEN JESSE KNIGHT AND THOMAS NICHOLLS TAYLOR ON architecture IN PROVO UTAH 189619151896 1915 A thesis presented to the department of art brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts 0 stephen A hales 1991 by stephen A hales december 1991 this thesis by stephen A hales is accepted in its present form by the department of art of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis requirement for the degree master of arts i r rr f 1 C mark hamilton committee0amimmiweemee chilechair mark Johnjohndonjohnkonjohnmmitteekonoon committeec6mmittee
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Traverse Mountain Health Consultation (HC)
    Health Consultation TRAVERSE MOUNTAIN: THALLIUM IN DRINKING WATER LEHI, UTAH COUNTY, UTAH Prepared by Utah Department of Health DECEMBER 3, 2014 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Health Consultation: A Note of Explanation A health consultation is a verbal or written response from ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partners to a specific request for information about health risks related to a specific site, a chemical release, or the presence of hazardous material. In order to prevent or mitigate exposures, a consultation may lead to specific actions, such as restricting use of or replacing water supplies; intensifying environmental sampling; restricting site access; or removing the contaminated material. In addition, consultations may recommend additional public health actions, such as conducting health surveillance activities to evaluate exposure or trends in adverse health outcomes; conducting biological indicators of exposure studies to assess exposure; and providing health education for health care providers and community members. This concludes the health consultation process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR or ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the Agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov HEALTH CONSULTATION TRAVERSE MOUNTAIN: THALLIUM IN DRINKING WATER LEHI, UTAH COUNTY, UTAH Prepared By: Environmental Epidemiology Program Office of Epidemiology Utah Department of Health Under a Cooperative Agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Traverse Mountain / Lehi, Utah Health Consultation TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Route 834-Riverwoods/Provo Station 834
    For Information Call 801-RIDE-UTA (801-743-3882) outside Salt Lake County 888-RIDE-UTA (888-743-3882) Route 834-Riverwoods/Provo Station www.rideuta.com 834 HOW TO USE THIS SCHEDULE Orem City/Riverwoods/ Determine your timepoint based on when you want to Provo Central Station River P leave or when you want to arrive. Read across for your ark Dr destination and down for your time and direction of travel. Orem Public Library City Center Park A route map is provided to help you relate to the timepoints shown. Weekday, Saturday & Sunday schedules 300 W Center St differ from one another. T RT 850 Provo Riverwoods UTA SERVICE DIRECTORY Ÿ Stat General Information, Schedules, Trip Planning and Customer Feedback: 801-RIDE-UTA (801-743-3882) e St Orem Ÿ Outside Salt Lake County call 888-RIDE-UTA (888-743- 3882) Univ Ÿ For 24 hour automated service for next bus available T -Route Transfer point 3700 N use option 1. Have stop number and 3 digit route er sit number (use 0 or 00 if number is not 3 digits). y A Ÿ Pass By Mail Information 801-262-5626 v Jameston Square e Ÿ For Employment information please visit http://www.rideuta.com/careers/ Ÿ Travel Training 801-287-2275 LOST AND FOUND Weber/South Davis: 801-626-1207 option 3 Centennial MS Utah County: 801-227-8923 2230 N Salt Lake County: 801-287-4664 2230 N Station Univ Rt 831, UVX Wyview Apartments F-Route: 801-287-5355 T ersit y Pk Lavell Edwards FARES wy Stadium Exact Fare is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Gather All Safely in Christ April 30–May 1, 2020 Welcome to BYU Women’S Conference
    Cosponsored by the Relief Society Gather All Safely In Christ April 30–May 1, 2020 Welcome to BYU Women’s Conference Dear Sisters, Welcome to the 2020 Brigham Young University Women’s Conference. We are delighted to have you here, and we thank you for bringing that special “Women’s Conference” spirit of charity and commitment with you. We are very grateful for the co-sponsorship of this conference by the Relief Society. Their guidance and influence in all of our preparations are unparalleled. Together we hope that you will feel answers to your concerns, comfort for your struggles, and encouragement in your efforts. This year’s theme, Gather All Safely In Christ, comes from President Russell M. Nelson’s emphasis on the gathering of scattered Israel in preparation for the Savior’s Second Coming. He has reached out to all of us, daughters of Heavenly Parents, and asked that we do all in our power to assist in bringing our brothers and sisters to Jesus Christ and the blessings of the plan of salvation. In this conference we will explore the many ways we can facilitate this great gathering. We also invite you to respond to our invitation, described on the Women’s Conference website and social media pages, to help illustrate the many ways sisters are contributing to the gathering of Israel. Please share your examples and experiences with us, and we will share them with attendees at Women’s Conference this year. We especially note the second Sister-to-Sister Event on Friday morning as our sister leaders answer questions and concerns from around the world and here at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Transit Authority
    UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY Director of Internal Audit Utah Transit Authority provides integrated mobility solutions to service life’s connections, improve public health and enhance quality of life. ABOUT UTA UTA was founded on March 3, 1970 after residents from Salt Lake City and the surrounding communities of Murray, Midvale, Sandy, and Bingham voted to form a public transit district. For the next 30 years, UTA provided residents in the Wasatch Front with transportation in the form of bus service. During this time, UTA also expanded its operations to include express bus routes, paratransit service, and carpool and vanpool programs. Today, with more than 1,400 square miles, UTA has one of the largest coverage areas of any public transportation in the country. Our services have grown to include light rail, bus rapid transit, and commuter rail lines. UTA provides public transportation to 80 percent of Utah residents and serves 75 cities in six counties. Each day, UTA’s team THE POSITION of more than 2,000 bus and rail operators, maintenance The Director of Internal Audit plays a critical role in personnel, and administrative employees keep the getting things done at UTA. This is a senior-level position agency on the road to Utah’s public transportation future. reporting to the Board of Trustees and completes financial, operational, asset, and performance audit assignments. Additionally, the Director of Internal Audit serves as UTA’s Ethics Officer and conducts investigations for ethics allegations, complaints of impropriety, and conflicts of interest. Major Upcoming Initiatives: • Annual Audit Plan • Operations and Management Audit • Audits of policies, procedures, and performance and recommends forward-looking improvements Click on the image to view the video “Pioneer Spirit” by UTA • Income Audits • Asset Audits UTA GOVERNANCE AND FUNDING • Project Audits, especially those concerning Governance Structure development The Utah Transit Authority is a public agency governed • Computer systems and data processing audits by a three-person, full-time Board of Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Exercise – Frontrunner Extension Meeya Apelu
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Engineering Applications of GIS - Laboratory Civil and Environmental Engineering Exercises 2017 Laboratory Exercise – Frontrunner Extension Meeya Apelu Jordan Arrowchris Joseph Browning Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gislabs Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, and the Geographic Information Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Apelu, Meeya; Arrowchris, Jordan; and Browning, Joseph, "Laboratory Exercise – Frontrunner Extension" (2017). Engineering Applications of GIS - Laboratory Exercises. 11. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gislabs/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Civil and Environmental Engineering at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Engineering Applications of GIS - Laboratory Exercises by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Laboratory Exercise – Frontrunner Extension Background The Utah Transit Authority’s (UTA) FrontRunner is a commuter rail line that runs 89 miles through Weber, Davis, Salt Lake, and Utah counties. There are 16 different stops along this line which are: Pleasant View, Ogden, Roy, Clearfield, Layton, Farmington, Woods Cross, North Temple, Salt Lake Central, Murray Central, South Jordan, Draper, Lehi, American Fork, Orem and Provo (UTA 2017). Using the FrontRunner is easy and is very convenient. The popularity of this transit system is increasing and UTA has announced their future plans to continue the rail line. UTA is exploring ways to go forward with this plan and in choosing future destinations to extend the transit path. ArcGIS Model Builder is well suited to assist in this process and answers the questions concerning the construction of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Current-Bus-List.Pdf
    Column1 Column2 Column3 Column4 Column5 Column6 Column7 Column8 Column9 Column10 Column11 Column12 Account No NAME PHONE LOCATION MAIL ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP OWNER NAME ACTIVITY LIC PERIOD TYPE 1 None ALCOHOL 5213 19 MAIN VIDA Y SALUD PROTEIN BAR 801‐420‐4394 19 S MAIN STREET 19 S MAIN STREET PLEASANT GROVE UT 84062 ORTIZGRIS MAGGALY FFOOD 06/15/2021 COMM 4469 1NANO, LLC 801‐796‐9000 2435 W 450 S, STE 101 PO BOX 655 SPRINGVILLE UT 84663 MURDOCK KENNETH RESRCH 10/04/2017 COMM 4780 2 LUCKY GIRLS, LLC 801‐899‐2094 855 W STATE ST, #103 10763 THOMAS VIEW CIRCLE SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 THOMAS ANDREA/GLINES KAREN REST 01/24/2019 COMM 3292 3 BROTHERS TESTING SCHOOL 801‐602‐7291 1090 E 900 S 1090 E 900 S PLEASANT GROVE UT 84062 GALI DENNIS J INSTRUCT 05/24/2010 HOME OCCP 3520 4 SEASONS AUTO REPAIR 801‐229‐1555 90 N 600 W 90 N 600 W PLEASANT GROVE UT 84062 THOLL STEVE AUTO 10/31/2011 COMM 1023 4 THE YOUTH INC 801‐785‐8870 1344 W STATE RD 1344 W STATE RD PLEASANT GROVE UT 84062 ASTLE STEVEN L MISCSERV 03/01/1998 COMM 1023 4 THE YOUTH INC 801‐785‐8870 1344 W STATE RD 1344 W STATE RD PLEASANT GROVE UT 84062 GOODMAN VICKI MISCSERV 03/01/1998 COMM 3720 5 SOCIAL, LLC 801‐796‐2231 1978 N GLENDON WAY 125 E MAIN ST, STE 150 AMERICAN FORK UT 84003 FAIRBANKS ADAM COMPDEV 03/27/2013 HOME OCCP 4034 7‐ELEVEN STORE #36340 A 801‐785‐0378 715 S MAIN STREET C/O 7‐ELEVEN LICENSING DALLAS TX 75221 SAHIB INCORPORATED FUEL 02/19/2015 COB 4034 7‐ELEVEN STORE #36340 A 801‐785‐0378 715 S MAIN STREET C/O 7‐ELEVEN LICENSING DALLAS TX 75221 SAHIB INCORPORATED FUEL 02/19/2015 ALCOHOL 5031 A CLEANER SPACE 385‐224‐6433 994 W 600 N 994 W 600 N PLEASANT GROVE UT 84062 STRICKLAND APRIL CLEAN 07/31/2020 HOME OCCP 117 A LITTLE ROMANCE, LLC 801‐785‐0729 685 S MOHAWK 685 S MOHAWK PLEASANT GROVE UT 84062 JOHNSON BETTY P RETAIL HOME OCCP 3529 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Board of the Utah Transit Authority
    Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Advisory Board of the Utah Transit Authority Wednesday, February 20, 2019, 11:00 a.m. Utah Transit Authority Headquarters, 669 West 200 South, Salt Lake City, Utah Golden Spike Conference Rooms UTA Advisory Board Members Present: Jeff Acerson Julie Fullmer Jacqueline Biskupski Robert Hale Leonard Call Clint Smith Erik Craythorne (joined by phone) Troy Walker Karen Cronin Advisory Board Members Excused/Not in Attendance: Also attending were members of UTA staff, as well as interested citizens and members of the media. Welcome and Call to Order Chair Acerson welcomed attendees and called the meeting to order at 11:01 a.m. with eight board members present. Eric Craythorne joined the meeting by telephone. Following Chair Acerson’s opening remarks, the advisory board and meeting attendees recited the Pledge of Allegiance. Oath of Office Cathie Griffiths performed the oath of office for advisory board member Clint Smith and alternates Jennifer McGrath and Mark Johnson. Safety Minute Chair Acerson yielded the floor to Jonathan Yip, UTA Senior Manager for Operations Analysis and Solutions, for a brief safety message. Public Comment Period Member Cronin introduced two attendees who gave public comment. Andrew Jackson, Executive Director of Mountainland Association of Governments, requested that the issue of compensation for the UTA Board of Trustees be revisited at the March advisory board meeting. Discussion ensued and there was some agreement that the topic could be discussed again if there is new information to be considered. Megan Townsend of Wasatch Front Regional Council thanked advisory board members for their partnership on the station area plans being discussed later in the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared For: Utah Transit Authority, Utah Department of Transportation Submitted By: Utah State University, Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning
    Prepared For: Utah Transit Authority, Utah Department of Transportation Submitted By: Utah State University, Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning https://www.skicity.com/blog/stories/post/ski-citys-uta-ski-bus/ DISCLAIMER The authors alone are responsible for the preparation and accuracy of the information, data, analysis, discussions, recommendations, and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, endorsements, or policies of the Utah Transit Authority. The Utah Transit Authority makes no representation or warranty of any kind, and assumes no liability therefore. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors acknowledge the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) and Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for funding this research (Project number: UTA 18-2936TP). Cover page photo: Mackensen. (2012). Flickr. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Line_(TRAX)#/media/File:TRAX_Red_Line_to_Daybreak_a t_Fort_Douglas_Station.jpg (accessed on April 23, 2020). i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]