Chairman and Planning and Zoning Commission FROM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chairman and Planning and Zoning Commission FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 100 Parkers Mill • Oswego, IL 60543 (630) 554-3622 • Fax: (630) 551-3975 www.oswegoil.org STAFF REPORT DATE: September 18, 2019 TO: Chairman and Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Rod Zenner, Community Development Director Natalie Zine, Planner SUBJECT: Staff Report for the October 10, 2019 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Text Amendment Adult Use Cannabis Project #1043.19 Purpose To provide the Planning and Zoning Commission with background and proposals regarding regulations for the uses associated with Adult Use Cannabis Background The State of Illinois approved the “Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act” which allows for the recreational use of cannabis within the State of Illinois beginning in January 1, 2020. Though this act allows for cannabis use and specific cannabis related businesses, it does allow communities to regulate and/or prohibit the cannabis businesses within their individual jurisdiction. It does not allow a community to prohibit the possession or consumption of cannabis as long at it is consistent with the guidelines within the State act. The Village Board is currently weighing the options of allowing cannabis related businesses, restricting certain businesses, or prohibiting the businesses altogether within the Village limits. The Board has requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the various businesses associated with cannabis outlined in the act and provide a proposed text amendment regarding those uses assuming that the Village Board determines to allow them within the Village corporate limits. Staff is providing a copy of the Illinois Municipal League’s FAQ regarding the new State regulations for your information. Text Amendment - Cannabis Project #1043.19 September 18, 2019 Page 2 Discussion The Act outlines several types of uses related to adult use cannabis. A definition of those types of uses from the Illinois Municipal League’s FAQ is as follows: Craft Grower: A facility operated by an organization or business that is licensed by the Illinois Department of Agriculture to cultivate, dry, cure, and package cannabis that is available for sale at a dispensing organization or for use at a processing organization. A craft grower may contain up to 5,000 square feet of canopy space on its premises for plants in the flowering stage. The Department of Agriculture may authorize an increase or decrease of flowering stage cultivation space in increments of 3,000 square feet by rule based on market need, craft grower capacity and the licensee's history of compliance or noncompliance, with a maximum space of 14,000 square feet for cultivating plants in the flowering stage, which must be cultivated in all stages of growth in an enclosed and secure area. Craft crowers can distribute to a cultivation center, a craft grower, an infuser, or dispensing organization. By State law, a craft grower cannot be located in a residentially zoned property or within 1,500 feet of another craft grower or cultivation center. Cultivation Center: means a facility operated by an organization or business that is licensed by the Department of Agriculture to cultivate, process, transport (unless otherwise limited by the Act) and perform other necessary activities to provide cannabis and cannabis-infused products to cannabis business establishments. Cultivation centers are limited to 210,000 square feet of canopy space for flowering plants. Cultivation centers may sell or distribute to dispensing organizations, craft growers, infusing organizations, and transporters. Dispensing Organization: means a facility operated by an organization or business that is licensed by the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation to acquire cannabis from a cultivation center, craft grower, processing organization or another dispensary for the purpose of selling or dispensing cannabis, cannabis-infused products, cannabis seeds, paraphernalia or related supplies under the Act to purchasers or to qualified registered medical cannabis patients and caregivers. As used in the Act, a “dispensing organization” shall include a registered medical cannabis organization as defined in the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Program Act or its successor Act that has obtained an Early Approval Adult Use Dispensing Organization License. Dispensing organizations cannot sell through a drive-thru window, vending machines, or transport to residents or other locations for sale. Per the Act, they are limited to the hours of 6:00am to 10:00 pm and cannot operate unless two people are working at the same time. A dispensary cannot be located within 1,500 feet of another dispensary. They also cannot advertise within 1,000 feet of a school, playground, hospital and health care facilities, recreation centers, child care centers, public parks, libraries, or arcade. Infuser Organization: or "infuser" means a facility operated by an organization or business that is licensed by the Illinois Department of Agriculture to directly incorporate cannabis or cannabis concentrate into a product formulation to produce a cannabis-infused product. They may only dell or distribute through a dispensary. They cannot be located within a residential zone. Processing Organization: A facility operated by an organization or business that is licensed by the Illinois Department of Agriculture to either extract constituent chemicals or compounds to Text Amendment - Cannabis Project #1043.19 September 18, 2019 Page 3 produce cannabis concentrate or incorporate cannabis or cannabis concentrate into a product formulation to produce a cannabis product, per the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act, (P.A. 101- 0027), as it may be amended from time-to-time, and regulations promulgated thereunder. Transportation Organization: An organization or business that is licensed by the Illinois Department of Agriculture to transport cannabis on behalf of a cannabis establishment or a community college licensed under the Community College Cannabis Vocational Training Pilot Program, per the Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act, (P.A. 101-0027), as it may be amended from time-to-time, and regulations promulgated thereunder. Marijuana Smoking Lounge/Marijuana Social Club: A location where you are allowed to consume or purchase and consume cannabis-based products Proposed Zoning Requirements: Staff has prepared a decision matrix table at the end of this memorandum to assist in the conversation regarding the proposed uses and potential zoning requirements Zoning Designation Assuming the Village Board determines that cannabis-based businesses would be allowed within the Village, it will need to determine what zoning designations would be required for the specific uses. Craft Grower, Cultivation Organization, Processing Organization, Transportation Organization – These uses are specific to the creation and processing of the cannabis product. Based on the Village’s Zoning Ordinance, it is staff’s opinion that these uses are most appropriate for the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts. Currently, the M-1 and M-2 allows the production and processing of drugs as a permitted use. Other manufacturing is allowed in the B-3 District, breweries for example, but the nature of these type of producers invites customers to observe and partake in the products at that B-3 location. Cannabis users are specifically different as they prohibit interaction with the general public, do not allow the intake of their product on site, and have security measures that are counter to the intended use and intensity of a B-3 District. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that these uses should be limited to the M-1 and M-2 Districts. Dispensing Organization – This use is limited to the sale of the cannabis product to the general public. It is staff’s opinion that the intensity of this type of use is similar to uses found in the B-2 Community Shopping District and B-3 Community Service and Wholesale District. The use is similar to the intensity of a tobacco store, liquor store, or drug store. The tobacco store and liquor store are uses that have a similar restriction of the sale of their product to customers of a certain age. Drug stores are also similar to the dispensing model as they sell prescriptions based on the records of an individual. Dispensaries must register the sale of product with every transaction. Staff also considered limiting the dispensaries to M-1 and M-2 Districts, but it is staff’s opinion that the manufacturing district is not intended for a retail type of use. The roads in industrial park Text Amendment - Cannabis Project #1043.19 September 18, 2019 Page 4 are designed for large trucks vs. many passenger vehicles as experienced in commercial retail areas. The parking lots are established based on industrial uses which have a lower parking requirement than retail organizations. Manufacturing districts are not designed to provide visibility of the units for the general public. Staff would recommend dispensaries be located in highly visible areas which can provide more security than an industrial location hidden from view from the public road. Smoking Lounge and Social Clubs/on premises consumption – It is staff’s opinion that these uses should not be allowed within the Village. These uses would encourage patrons to visit their location, consume product, and then leave the site in their vehicle. As there is not a reliable way to determine if a user is under the influence, it will be difficult for the police to identify if a driver was impaired. The Village Board has also indicated that they are not in favor of this type of use within the Village. Special Use The Village has the ability to allow the proposed uses as permitted by right or to require a Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit would require a petitioner to come before the Planning and Zoning Commission for a public hearing and recommendation. That would then be forwarded to the Village Board for final decision. Under a Special Use permit, the Village could require specific conditions that would mitigate any impacts of a proposed use.
Recommended publications
  • Texto Completo Libro (Pdf)
    LAS SENDAS DE LA REGULACIÓN DEL CANNABIS EN ESPAÑA Consejo editorial María Eugenia Aubet - Manuel Cruz Rodríguez - Josep M. Delgado Ribas - Oscar Guasch Andreu - Antonio Izquierdo Escribano - Raquel Osborne - R. Lucas Platero - Oriol Romaní Alfonso - Amelia Sáiz López - Verena Stolcke - Olga Viñuales Sarasa Serie General Universitaria - 191 REGULACIÓN RESPONSABLE (ed.) LAS SENDAS DE LA REGULACIÓN DEL CANNABIS EN ESPAÑA Editor académico: David Pere Martínez Oró edicions bellaterra Diseño de la colección: Joaquín Monclús © Sus autores, 2017 © Regulación responsable, 2017 © David Pere Martínez Oró, 2017 © Edicions Bellaterra, S.L., 2017 Navas de Tolosa, 289 bis. 08026 Barcelona www.ed-bellaterra.com Quedan prohibidos, dentro de los límites establecidos en la ley y bajo los apercibimientos legalmente previstos, la reproducción total o parcial de esta obra por cualquier medio o procedimiento, ya sea electrónico o mecánico, el tratamiento informático, el alquiler o cualquier otra forma de cesión de la obra sin la autorización previa y por escrito de los titulares del copyright. Diríjase a CEDRO (Centro Español de Derechos Reprográficos, http://www.cedro.org) si necesita fotocopiar o escanear algún fragmento de esta obra. Impreso en España Printed in Spain ISBN: 978-84-7290-809-3 Depósito Legal: B. 6.579-2017 Impreso por Prodigitalk. Martorell (Barcelona) Índice Autores, 15 Presentación, 25 A modo de prólogo. Las sendas de la regulación del cannabis en Es- paña, 27 BLOQUE I Los consumos de cannabis en clave sociocultural 1. Cannabis en España. Continuidades y puntos de inflexión históri- cos, 33 Desde la Antigüedad a la Edad Moderna, 33 • Exotismo, literatura y terapéutica durante el siglo XIX y primer tercio del XX, 35 • El Protec- torado de la Zona de Marruecos y la guerra civil, 37 • Los grifotas del franquismo, 38 • Transición y consolidación democrática, 40 • Refe- rencias bibliográficas, 43 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoe Begin Ik Een
    HOW TO SET UP A CSC IN 4 STEPS Presentation by Joep Oomen, Encod SPAIN • Since 2005, approx. 200 clubs have been set up • Legal basis: cultivation for personal use is not prosecuted • Some clubs have thousands of members, consumption room, open daily • One Spanish village (Rasquera, Catalonia) is ready to produce for CSC’s, regional authorities are considering legal regulation for clubs • www.fac.cc BELGIUM • One CSC: Trekt Uw Plant, operating since 2010 • Legal basis: ministerial guideline allowing 1 plant per adult • TUP has 300 members, 2 regional sections • 14 growers, with a max. of 32 plants each • Every 2/3 months: harvest • Information on homegrowing, healthier ways of growing and consuming, lobby for cannabis regulation • www.trektuwplant.be FRANCE • Initiative to organise collectives who wish to work along the CSC guidelines since July 2012 • Legal basis: none – it is an act of civil disobedience • 150 initiatives around the country, first meeting to agree on common principles in december 2012 • Facebook: Cannabis Social Club Français GERMANY • Facebook page to promote the idea • Legal basis: none – it is an act of civil disobedience • In February 2012, a hearing on CSC’s took place in German parliament • Facebook: Pro Cannabis Social Club's für Deutschland UNITED KINGDOM • Website to promote the idea • Legal basis: none – it is an act of civil disobedience • Some 50 clubs exist on the website – unclear if they are active or not • www.cannabiscure.co.uk ITALY • Several initiatives to open the discussion • Legal basis: none –
    [Show full text]
  • How Can the Lens of Human Rights Provide a New Perspective on Drug Control and Point to Different Ways of Regulating Drug Consumption?
    How can the lens of human rights provide a new perspective on drug control and point to different ways of regulating drug consumption? A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Melissa L. Bone School of Law Table of Contents Index of Tables……………………………………………………………………..….5 Table of Cases………………………………………….………………………………6 Table of Statutes, Treaties and Legislative Instruments……………………………....10 List of Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………15 Abstract………………………………………………...…………………………….18 Candidate’s Declaration and Copyright Statement…………………………………...19 Acknowledgements…………………………………...……………………………...20 Introduction………………………………………………………………..…………22 Chapter 1: Understanding the origin and value of human rights and psychoactive consumption………………………………………………………………………….32 1.1 What are human rights and where have they come from?………..……………….33 1.2 Human right foundations and the question of importance…………...……………36 1.3 The grounds for human rights…………………………………………….………42 1.3.1 ‘The universalist challenge’…………………………………………..46 1.4 The origin and value of human psychoactive consumption……………………….49 1.5 Conclusion……………………………………………………………..…………54 Chapter 2: Understanding how human rights can address the drug policy binary: the conflict between the interests of the State and the interests of the individual………….55 2.1 Defining ‘the State’……………………………………………………...………..56 2.2 Identifying four ‘typical philosophical positions and the binary which underpins them……………………………………………………………….………………….62
    [Show full text]
  • A Bottom up Proposal for a Regulated Cannabis Market
    A BOTTOM UP PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATED CANNABIS MARKET By Joep Oomen, European Coalition for Just and Effective Drug Policies Wellcome and thanks for the invitation…. Encod is convinced that a Europe with peace, prosperity, personal rights and freedoms, effective governance, policies aimed at solving problems and not at creating them, is a Europe where the drugsmarket has been regulated. The lack of a legal framework with regards to drugs is one of the pillars of a system that essentially denies human beings legal access to products (some of them even natural products) which are benefitial to their health, physical or mental. Among the many disasters that prohibition of cannabis and other drugs has produced, maybe the worst is that it has destroyed this access, and instead established a market that is almost entirely driven by economic reasons, without taking into account the rights of consumers and producers. This lack of framework is deliberately maintained so on the one hand, power structures can continue to feed themselves with money gained from desperacy, while on the other, power structures can continue to justify fargoing control and intrusion in people’s private life. Drug prohibition is serving the needs of the elite, and therefore it will not be the elite that will be able to stop it. If we want to replace this policy with a sound and healthy alternative, we need to build it ourselves, bottom up. Since more than a decade, citizens allover Europe have started to use the loopholes in the absurd drug law to create this alternative. Wellcome to the Cannabis Social Club! Cannabis Social Clubs organise the collective cultivation of an amount of cannabis that is exclusively meant for the private consumption of their members.
    [Show full text]
  • How Higher Education Can Support Cannabis Career Pathways by Becky
    Creating a qualified cannabis workforce: How higher education can support cannabis career pathways by Becky E. Black B.S., California State University Long Beach, 1987 M.A., Phillips Graduate Institute, 1995 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF EDUCATION Department of Adult Learning and Leadership College of Education KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2020 Abstract Background The popularity of medicinal and recreational cannabis is increasing the need for a trained workforce. The purpose of this study is to examine the workforce needs of the cannabis industry from the perspective of cannabis industry experts. The findings will assist institutions that are providing or plan to offer cannabis academic courses and programs. To meet and respond to the dynamic evolution of the cannabis industry, colleges will need to be nimble or find ways to be nimble. Methods This qualitative study utilized Heidegger's interpretative phenomenological research design to capture the essence of eight cannabis industry professionals’ (three females, five males) experience and interpretation of the workforce needs of the growing cannabis industry. Purposive sampling and snowball sampling determined the subjects for the remotely recorded, unstructured, six-question, in-depth interviews. The interviews ranged in length from 49 minutes to 126 minutes. The researcher transcribed the interviews verbatim, then coded and analyzed results for themes and implications for practice. The purpose of this methodology is to describe the essence of the research subjects’ lived experiences. The researcher did not bracket their biases. Results Research subjects had from two months to 12 years of experience working in the legal cannabis industry; from three years being affiliated with the cannabis industry and up to 43 years being in the black or black and gray market.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT PROGRAMME 24‒26 October | Lisboa Congress Centre, Portugal | #Lxaddictions17 | |
    DRAFT PROGRAMME 24‒26 October | Lisboa Congress Centre, Portugal www.lisbonaddictions.eu | #LxAddictions17 | | DAY 1 TUESDAY 24 OCTOBER 08:00 Arrival and registration 09:00 – 10:00 INAUGURAL SESSIONS Science to policy Chair: Alison Ritter, Australia Policy to science Chair: Werner Sipp, Germany Henrietta Bowden-Jones, Imperial College London, United Kingdom Chloé Carpentier, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Alexandre Quintanilha, Chair, Parliamentary Commission on Education and Science, Torbjorn Brekke, Pompidou Group Portugal Vladimir Poznyak, World Health Organization Jallal Toufiq, The Moroccan Observatory on Drugs and Addiction, Morocco Floriana Sipala, European Commission 10:00 – 10:30 PLENARY SESSION I (FEEDBACK FROM INAUGURAL SESSIONS) Chairs: Alexis Goosdeel, EMCDDA and João Goulão, SICAD Alison Ritter, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Australia Werner Sipp, Former President International Narcotics Control Board, Germany 10:30 – 11:00 Opening ceremony 11:00 – 11:30 Coffee break 1 / 20 Draft 28 July 2017 DAY 1 TUESDAY 24 OCTOBER 11:30 – 13:00 PARALLEL SESSIONS (see separate document for poster sessions) PAPER SESSION 1 PAPER SESSION 2 PAPER SESSION 3 PAPER SESSION 4 PAPER SESSION 5 Alcohol - informing prevention The measurement of problems and A focus on pharmacotherapy Ageing and intergenerational issues Gambling - behavioural insights and policy trends − Law of alcohol. Two sides of the − Measuring problematic cannabis − Patient centered care for injectable opioid − Opioid treatment outcomes in − Problem gambling in coin: consumers and retailers. use in the general population: assisted treatment. Kirsten Marchand, older adults: a review of the adolescence: an analysis Elsa Lavado, Portugal conception, use and future of the Canada literature. Anne Marie Carew, conducted from the actor’s − Alcohol marketing: how to cannabis abuse screening test − Orienting the appropriate treatment of pain Ireland perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Models for the Legal Supply of Cannabis: Recent Developments
    UPDATED 31. 5. 2016 UPDATED PERSPECTIVES ON DRUGS Models for the legal supply of cannabis: recent developments Three United Nations conventions provide The international legal framework on drug control is provided the international legal framework on drug by three United Nations conventions, which instruct control, instructing countries to limit drug countries to limit drug supply and use to medical and scientific purposes. Nevertheless, there is increasing debate supply and use to medical and scientific over legalisation of drugs for non-medical purposes, and purposes. Yet, debate is increasing on of cannabis in particular. Such proposals raise concerns the legalisation of drugs for non-medical over increases in use and harms and questions about the ways in which the distribution of cannabis for non-medical purposes, particularly cannabis. Models purposes could be carefully regulated to mitigate these. In under development for the legal supply of the EU, a system of limited distribution has evolved in the cannabis are described in this analysis, as Netherlands since the 1970s, with further developments in the last few years. Detailed proposals for non-medical well as some of the questions they raise. cannabis regulation were initiated in two states in the United States and in Uruguay at the end of 2012, which entered into force in 2014, the year when two more US states and Washington DC voted to allow for the supply and distribution of the drug. These are different models that are being closely observed to understand the advantages and disadvantages of a particular regulated system. In addition to these systems, the model of ‘cannabis social clubs’ has been increasingly mentioned in drug policy debates.
    [Show full text]
  • V 2.2 the UK Model UKCSC Full
    Valid from: 14 October UKCSC Operations Manual 2014 The UKCSC is a regulatory body that regulates the cannabis Clubs and Collectives within the UKCSC, within the UK and Commonwealth (including any and all over-seas territories, bailiwicks, principalities, The UK Model islands, military camps, embassies and any other place where UK law is enforceable). UK Model - UKCSC Official Guidelines 2014 UKCSC Master Document Contents pg Introduction 3 Organisation Structure 4 Board Constitution 6 Board Statutes 11 Duties of the Executive 18 Code of Conduct 19 Social Media Policy 20 Complaints Process 25 Affiliate Rules 28 Collective Models Approved 29 Fair Trade Agreement 33 Fair Trade Calculator * Taxation 38 How To Register 40 How To Follow A Tagging Cycle 41 Q & A on Tagged Cultivation 43 Collective Example Record Sheet 47 What If… In the Event of Police Intervention 50 Data Handling 54 Harm Reduction 55 CSC Registration To National 57 CSC Constitution 58 CSC Association Statutes 63 CSC Membership Pack Information 69 CSC Individual Membership Form 70 Collective Registration To CSC Form 72 Transport Form 73 Collective Individual Membership Form 74 Grow Room Documentation/Signage 75 Collective Member & plant tag register 77 Collective Record Sheet 78 Transfer Record Form 80 Affiliates Registration Form 81 *see separate excel sheet. 1 | P a g e UK Model - UKCSC Official Guidelines 2014 WARNING – DISCLAIMER – PLEASE READ Cannabis consumption, possession and supply are illegal under current UK legislation. Possessing or cultivating any form of cannabis without a Home Office license, anywhere in the UK by anyone in the UK is prohibited by law. Membership of the UKCSC or any particular CSC or Collective DOES NOT constitute a Home Office license.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Regulation Overview
    Cannabis regulation Tom Blickman Forum Droghe Summer School 2015 Firenze, 3-4-5 september 2015 Overview • Coffeeshops in the Netherlands • Cannabis Social Clubs • Uruguay • United States • Cannabis policy reform in Europe • Elements for regulation Coffeeshops in the Netherlands The backdoor problem Coffee shops are allowed to sell up to 5 grams of cannabis to consumers (the front door), but have to buy their stock on the illegal market (the back door). To get coffee shops out of the criminal sphere entirely, the cultivation of cannabis needs to be regulated. Coffeeshops in the Netherlands Dutch Opium Act: sale and possession of cannabis remains a statutory offence. The ‘expediency principle’: a discretionary option that allows the Public Prosecution to refrain from prosecution if it is in the public interest to do so. The investigation and prosecution has been assigned the ‘lowest judicial priority’. Coffeeshops are tolerated when they follow a guideline – known as the AHOJGI criteria – issued by the Ministry of Justice through the Public Prosecution Office. Coffeeshops in the Netherlands AHOJGI criteria • no advertising (A) • not selling hard drugs (H) • not causing public disorder (O) • no sales to minors (J) • sales limited to a small quantity per transaction (5 grams) / limits on inventory (500 grams) (G) • in 2013, an additional criterion was added that limits sales to residents in the municipality (I) A survey in February 2014 found that 85% of the municipalities did not actively enforce the residence criterion Coffeeshops in the Netherlands • Cultivation of cannabis is prohibited, although 5 plants are tolerated in general. The police has to confiscate the plants but there will be no criminal prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs: Breaking the Cycle
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Drugs: Breaking the Cycle Ninth Report of Session 2012–13 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 13 and 22 March, and 24 April 2012, in the previous session of Parliament, and 15 May, 19 June, 18 September, 16 October, and 13 and 27 November 2012 Published on 10 December 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West and Abingdon) James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Michael Ellis MP (Conservative, Northampton North) Lorraine Fullbrook MP (Conservative, South Ribble) Dr Julian Huppert MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham Selly Oak) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Mark Reckless MP (Conservative, Rochester and Strood) Karl Turner MP (Labour, Kingston upon Hull East) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Member was also a member of the Committee during the Parliament. Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour & Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Regulations in the United States
    Cannabis regulations in the United States Ivana Obradovic MEMO N° 2017-02 SAINT-DENIS, MARCH 2017 INTRODUCTION Although cannabis is still prohibited at federal level, 8 American states and the District of Columbia have made unprecedented changes to their cannabis regulations with the legalisation of cultivation, sale1, possession and use of cannabis for non-medical (i.e. recreational) purposes from the age of 21. These changes in the legal status of "recreational" cannabis have arisen even though "medical" use is already permitted in 29 states2. Hence, in the third most populated country in the world, one in five inhabitants is currently (or will be) experiencing a legal regime authorising the purchase and use of cannabis for recreational use by adults (i.e. 65 million citizens). The initial initiatives for legalisation were approved via voter initiatives in 2012, in 2 Western states (Colorado and Washington State), then in 2014 in Oregon, Alaska and Washington DC. At the same time as the presidential election on 8 November 2016, 4 new states (California, Maine, Massachusetts and Nevada) followed. Legalisation in California, the most populous state and the sixth leading economic power worldwide, highlights the scale of this trend. This memo describes the regulatory models instituted in the American states in which cannabis Similarities and differences in regulatory models 2 has been legalised, Highlighting differences with the medical cannabis market 2 highlighting both the Regulation = legalisation subject to conditions 3 Disparate production and distribution regulations 4 similarities and differences Taxation and fixing of prices 4 in the regulations. It then Allocation of tax revenue 5 examines the processes Characteristics of the legalisation process for cannabis 5 and common features of Pioneering states in the decriminalisation of cannabis 5 legalising states.
    [Show full text]
  • FILIERA DELLA CANAPA È Giunta L’Ora Di Una Nuova Legge INTERVISTE Stampo Con La Canapa, E Ci Costruisco La Casa NUOVE DIREZIONI Finanza, Agricoltura E Open Source
    numero 0 beleafmagazine.it CANAPA MAG FILIERA DELLA CANAPA È giunta l’ora di una nuova legge INTERVISTE Stampo con la canapa, e ci costruisco la casa NUOVE DIREZIONI Finanza, agricoltura e Open Source GRATIS AVBF canapamundi.com [email protected] +39 06 88809957 CANAPA MAG in questo numero 5 Editoriale 23 Storia della Canapa – Napoleone... Nient’altro che un piccolo proibizionista 6 Bioedilizia – Costruirsi la casa da soli 24 Estrazioni: Una nuova passione 8 Coltivazione – Coltivare senz’acqua: La storia di Pascal 26 Canapa e Finanza – Starting Finance 10 Orto in città – Pomodoro in balcone 27 News prodotti 11 Erbe selvatiche e dintorni – Portulaca: 28 iVegan – La favola delle mucche da latte un’erbetta da non estirpare 29 Cannabusiness: Canapoil 12 Ricette: Il lupo mangia l’erba + Plum Cake Eventi: Hanftag, la giornata della Canapa al Limone in Alto Adige 13 Dalla Copertina – Speciale DDL Filiera 30 Eventi – Pikkanapa, una mostra mercato della Canapa per una cultura in crescita 16 Intervista: Hemp Farm Italia – Cultura, 31 Giardini d’Europa – Hortus Botanicus Mar Biodiversità e Km0 I Murtra 18 Cannabusiness: Emilcanapa – Tra Canapa 32 Libri: Ghetto Italia + Libri Mai Visti e Opensource 33 Informazioni BeLeaf 20 Intervista: Kanésis – stampare in 3d, la chimica non è inevitabile 34 Canapa Live! IL PROSSIMO NUMERO DI BELEAF MAGAZINE USCIRÀ IL 10 GENNAIO 2017 Be Leaf Magazine Collaboratori: Abbonamenti: Canapa e Cultura Andrea Biello, Alessandro Oria, eMmeFfe, [email protected] Anno 0 - Numero 0 - 2016 Dinafem Team, Carolina Arzà, bBerry, Associazione Freeweed.it, Omar Brun, CBG Stampato presso: Be Leaf Magazine è una pubblicazione aka Gosh, Starting Finance Team, Salvatore Arti Grafiche la Moderna Green Leaf di Mario Sammarone Ricciardi, Manlio Calafrocampano, Luigi Via Niobe, 63C - 00118 - Roma Loscalzo, Gianlupo, Bruno Telser – CSC DISCLAIMER In collaborazione con Ass.
    [Show full text]