The Mindblowing Evolution of Humanoid Robots Including the “Icub” That Has a “Sense of Self”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mindblowing Evolution of Humanoid Robots Including the “Icub” That Has a “Sense of Self” The Mindblowing Evolution of Humanoid Robots Including the “iCub” That Has a “Sense of Self” By Nicholas West | Activist Post This is an update to the chronicle detailing the evolution of humanoid robots (with videos) In the age of computers, things evolve exponentially. In just a few generations robots have gone from a scientific fantasy, to a playful curiosity, to entering the battlefield to replace and/or augment their human counterparts. We are already at the point where we have to consider what the next step of robotic evolution looks like. According to robotics engineers, it appears that at some point in the near future the next step could very well be whatever the next generation robot chooses for itself. Just late last year it was posited that the humanoid robot was poised to take a leap from a mere facsimile of human behavior to one that futurists suggest will not only walk like a human, but will possess self awareness, as well as a full range of high-tech computational spectrum analysis and capabilities . and emotions. That day has apparently now arrived. The chronicle below charts the advancement from the rudimentary, through the downright creepy, and toward today where, according to the final video from New Scientist, we see that the new generation of iCub humanoid robot can in fact determine its own goals and exhibit emotional behavior and language skills that so far have been exclusively human. So far, development in humanoid robots has been limited to their physicality. A level of advancement has now been achieved that it is leading to serious concern about the economic impact of humans being outsourced to robots for tasks as diverse as service, manufacturing, nursing, housework, yard maintenance and full-fledged agricultural duties. Some are predicting that robots of all types could fully replace humans by 2045. Artificial intelligence is now advancing to a point where a new type of brain can be offered to compliment the relatively menial tasks of modern-day robotics, hinting at the next stage of evolution. It is typical of any science with military applications to evolve in a dual- or even multi-use fashion. For example, humanoid robots were initially advertised as a study in how to benefit those who have lost limbs; and, indeed, this has been a noted benefit. However, the real money — the black budget money — goes into applications which can be downright frightening. Enter DARPA, which had already been working on its own projects, but through its Robotics Grand Challenge has spurred a huge influx of inventors looking to receive DARPA funding to offer the next generation of humanoids. The Challenge has been couched in the comforting language of “disaster response” research, but what is emerging seems to be capable of far more than that: The primary goal of the DARPA Robotics Challenge program is to develop ground robotic capabilities to execute complex tasks in dangerous, degraded, human-engineered environments. The program will focus on robots that can utilize available human tools, ranging from hand tools to vehicles. The program aims to advance the key robotic technologies of supervised autonomy, mounted mobility, dismounted mobility, dexterity, strength, and platform endurance. Supervised autonomy will be developed to allow robot control by non- expert operators, to lower operator workload, and to allow effective operation despite low fidelity (low bandwidth, high latency, intermittent) communications. (Source) From the task section: The specific tasks are: 1) The robot will maneuver to a open frame utility vehicle, such as a John Deere Gator or a Polaris Ranger. The robot is to get into the driver’s seat and drive it to a specified location. 2) The robot is to get out of the vehicle, maneuver to a locked door, unlock it with a key, open the door, and go inside. 3) The robot will traverse a 100 meter, rubble strewn hallway. 4) At the end of the hallway, the robot will climb a ladder. 5) The robot will locate a pipe that is leaking a yellow- colored gas (non-toxic, non-corrosive). The robot will then identify a valve that will seal the pipe and actuate that valve, sealing the pipe. 6) The robot will locate a broken pump and replace it. The robot will be teleoperated, at least at the supervisory level. DARPA will control the communications bandwidth and latency, in order to make the task more difficult and force higher levels of autonomous behavior. If necessary, this control over communications will be used to discriminate performance levels between competitors and select a winner. […] The goal of this Grand Challenge is to create a humanoid robot that can operate in an environment built for people and use tools made for people. The specific challenge is built around an industrial disaster response. The current array of robots designed over the last few years to match human capability demonstrate what is listed above, and then some: PETMAN: An anthropomorphic robot designed for testing chemical protection clothing. Its range of motion allows it to balance, walk, crawl, and even climb stairs, while also having the ability to simulate human physiology such as sweating. (Source) B.E.A.R: Battlefield Extraction Assist Robot. Demonstrates a wide range of capability, while adding a semi-human appearance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnDM6xI9tmg ARM: A new level of robotic hand that employs an opposable thumb to increase dexterity vs. the robot seen above which uses plier-like grips. The ARM is capable of unlocking and opening doors, as well as picking up thin objects like cards or keys. (Source) Golf robot: This might seem like a goofy novelty, but golf is an extremely precise sport with a lot of room for error — humans can play for decades and never reach a level of mastery. The golf robot can fire shot after shot with stunning accuracy from a long distance. This ad for the European Tour has the added benefit of offering the “coolness” factor to all ages. (Source) And, naturally, this has all evolved into anything but fun and games. The evolution of PETMAN is an actual Terminator-like robot called ATLAS. Meanwhile, even mainstream institutions like Cambridge and major international human rights groups say that “terminators” are one of the greatest threats to humanity. As you’ll see in the next video, ATLAS has advanced quite a bit since its introduction in July of 2013. While ATLAS still proceeds slowly on its tether, it is moving with far better agility than its previous incarnation: However, these are still just workhorses and advanced tools of human mimicry. For these creations to get to the next level, they have to become self-aware and eventually autonomous. The computing power is certainly arriving as evidenced by what has been achieved through flying drone swarms and work being done on autonomous, interconnected battlefield systems such as MUSIC. Transhumanist icon Ray Kurzweil’s website featured a story about Samsung’s Roboray, which just got a major upgrade. Roboray still has an obviously robotic physical look, but its “intelligence” is increasing: Roboray can now build real-time 3D visual maps, so he can walk around without being spaced out and wandering off. Roboray has stereo cameras (one in each eye), allowing him to build a mental map of its surroundings, and to “remember” where he has been before. That kind of autonomous robot navigation will also come in handy in places where there’s no GPS signal. Furthermore, its walking demo as shown in the video below make it appear more humanoid than its initial outward appearance, something desirable for those who seek to make the human-to- robot emotional connection: Roboray walks in a more human-like manner by using “dynamic walking” — actually falling at every step, and using gravity to carry himself forward. Which is how humans naturally walk. So this makes him better accepted by people and more energy-efficient, says team leader Dr. Walterio Mayol-Cuevas, Deputy Director of the Bristol Robotics Lab. For the next phase of development, it is always important to watch the battlefield, but we should also watch for the signs of marketing that aims to normalize the robot presence in our day-to-day lives. This is being attempted through next-level artificial intelligence calledEmbodied General Intelligence (essentially, common sense). The next phase of humanoid robots are those that become virtually indistinguishable from us. There is no lack of effort to try to make this happen. Here is an ongoing Indiogogo project to give humanoid robot Adam Z1 a real brain. This is an effort that also has parallels with NeuroGaming. These two videos leave nothing to the imagination as to what the endgame is: not only the economic acceptance of robots, but the emotional acceptance. Not that long from now, full-sized humanoid robots will be in wide use as personal assistants, etc. And cheaper versions will be widespread as toys before long: think “RoboSapien with a cute face and a cloud-based mind.” GENI Lab So the team has formed GENI Lab, whose medium-term goal is “the creation of a life-sized humanoid robot featuring a realistic, emotional face and personality; a fluidly moving body, based on the integration of analog, digital and mechanical control; an adaptive general intelligence, utilizing the OpenCog architecture and the DeSTIN machine vision system; capability of simple — but socially and emotionally savvy — communication in English and ultimately other natural languages; and communication about its physical environment and its tasks and behaviors therein.” iCub This robot is an attempt to put it all together, including tactile sensations and learning from those contact interactions.
Recommended publications
  • RS Media User Manual
    A Fusion of technology and Personality User Manual North America Item No. 8061 | Ages 8+ CAUTION - ELECTRICAL TOY: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR CHILDREN UNDER 4 YEARS OF AGE. AS WITH ALL ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS, PRECAUTIONS SHOULD BE OBSERVED DURING HANDLING AND USE TO PREVENT ELECTRICAL SHOCK. INPUT: AC100-240V, 50/60HZ OUTPUT: DC 7.5V 3.1A COPYRIGHT INFORMATION RS Media™, Robosapien™, Robosapien™ V2, Roboreptile™, Robopet™, and Roboraptor™ are copyright and trademarked by Wowwee Ltd. Sun Microsystems and Java are registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. All other copyrights are hereby acknowledged. sYsTeM RequIReMeNTs Minimum system requirements for running RS Media Editing Suite. Microsoft® Windows® XP SP2 or higher (English Edition) (Compatible with German, Spanish, French, and Italian Windows® XP SP2 or higher) PC with PIII 1.5GHz equivalent or higher processor 256 MB of system RAM 16 MB video card recommended 200 MB available hard disk space CD-ROM drive Supply of this product does not convey a license nor imply any right to distribute content created with this product in revenue-generating broadcast systems (terrestrial, satellite, cable and/or other distribution channels), streaming applications (via Internet, intranets and/or other networks), other content distribution systems (pay-audio or audio-on- demand applications and the like) or on physical media (compact discs, digital versatile discs, semiconductor chips, hard drives, memory cards and the like). An independent license for such use is required. For details, please visit http://mp3licensing.com. WELCOME Congratulations on choosing Rs Media™, the next generation of Robosapien technology and personality. RS Media is a complete multimedia robotic experience with the unique ability to be fully customized.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Realization of a Humanoid Robot for Fast and Autonomous Bipedal Locomotion
    TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN Lehrstuhl für Angewandte Mechanik Design and Realization of a Humanoid Robot for Fast and Autonomous Bipedal Locomotion Entwurf und Realisierung eines Humanoiden Roboters für Schnelles und Autonomes Laufen Dipl.-Ing. Univ. Sebastian Lohmeier Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Maschinenwesen der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor-Ingenieurs (Dr.-Ing.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Udo Lindemann Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Heinz Ulbrich 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Horst Baier Die Dissertation wurde am 2. Juni 2010 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Maschinenwesen am 21. Oktober 2010 angenommen. Colophon The original source for this thesis was edited in GNU Emacs and aucTEX, typeset using pdfLATEX in an automated process using GNU make, and output as PDF. The document was compiled with the LATEX 2" class AMdiss (based on the KOMA-Script class scrreprt). AMdiss is part of the AMclasses bundle that was developed by the author for writing term papers, Diploma theses and dissertations at the Institute of Applied Mechanics, Technische Universität München. Photographs and CAD screenshots were processed and enhanced with THE GIMP. Most vector graphics were drawn with CorelDraw X3, exported as Encapsulated PostScript, and edited with psfrag to obtain high-quality labeling. Some smaller and text-heavy graphics (flowcharts, etc.), as well as diagrams were created using PSTricks. The plot raw data were preprocessed with Matlab. In order to use the PostScript- based LATEX packages with pdfLATEX, a toolchain based on pst-pdf and Ghostscript was used.
    [Show full text]
  • SBIR Program Document
    Topic Index and Description A20-101 Continuous Flow Recrystallization of Energetic Nitramines A20-102 Deep Neural Network Learning Based Tools for Embedded Systems Under Side Channel Attacks A20-103 Beyond Li-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles (EV) A20-104 Wireless Power transfer A20-105 Direct Wall Shear Stress Measurement for Rotor Blades A20-106 Electronically-Tunable, Low Loss Microwave Thin-film Ferroelectric Phase-Shifter A20-107 Automated Imagery Annotation and Segmentation for Military Tactical Objects A20-108 Multi-Solution Precision Location Determination System to be Operational in a Global Positioning System (GPS) Denied Environment for Static, Dynamic and Autonomous Systems under Test A20-109 Environmentally Adaptive Free-Space Optical Communication A20-110 Localized High Bandwidth Wireless Secure Mesh Network A20-111 Non-Destructive Evaluation of Bonded Interface of Cold Spray Additive Repair A20-112 Compact, High Performance Engines for Air Launched Effects UAS A20-113 Optical Based Health Usage and Monitoring System (HUMS) A20-114 3-D Microfabrication for In-Plane Optical MEMS Inertial Sensors A20-115 Using Artificial Intelligence to Optimize Missile Sustainment Trade-offs A20-116 Distributed Beamforming for Non-Developmental Waveforms A20-117 Lens Antennas for Resilient Satellite Communications (SATCOM) on Ground Tactical Vehicles A20-118 Novel, Low SWaP-C Unattended Ground Sensors for Relevant SA in A2AD Environments A20-119 Efficient Near Field Charge Transfer Mediated Infrared Detectors A20-120 Very Small Pixel Uncooled
    [Show full text]
  • A Control Architecture for Dynamically Stable Gaits of Small Size Humanoid Robots
    A CONTROL ARCHITECTURE FOR DYNAMICALLY STABLE GAITS OF SMALL SIZE HUMANOID ROBOTS Andrea Manni ¤;1, Angelo di Noi ¤ and Giovanni Indiveri ¤ ¤ Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Innovazione, Universit`a di Lecce, via per Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy, Fax: +39 0832 297279, email:fandrea.manni, giovanni.indiveri, [email protected] Abstract: From the 1970's biped robots have had a large attention from the robotic research community. Yet the issue of controlling dynamically stable walking for arbitrary biped robots is still open. We propose a simple control architecture based on the use of the FRI (Foot Rotation Indicator) point and the support polygon. The major advantage of the proposed architecture is that motion planning (and eventually sensor based re-planning (slower feedback loop)) is limited to the leg joints whereas the trunk and arm degrees of freedom are controlled in closed loop (faster feedback loop) to achieve overall dynamic stability. Such architecture allows to decouple the problem of dynamic stable walking in the two relatively simpler problems of gait generation and robot stabilization. This architecture is particularly suited for small size robots having limited onboard computational power and limited sensor suits. The e®ectiveness of the proposed method has been validated through Matlabr simulations and experimental tests performed on a Robovie-MS platform. Copyright °c 2006 IFAC Keywords: control architecture, dynamically stable gait, foot rotation indicator, support polygon. 1. INTRODUCTION over twenty actuated degrees of freedom and gen- erally they carry some microcontroller electronics Humanoid robots are enjoying increasing popular- board for the low level control, i.e. to generate ity as their anthropomorphic body allows the in- target signals for the actuators.
    [Show full text]
  • Robosapien RS Media - the Champion of Robotic Toys Submitted By: Gizoo Thursday, 19 October 2006
    Robosapien RS Media - the champion of robotic toys Submitted by: Gizoo Thursday, 19 October 2006 With 67 different programmable movements, extensive speech responses and removable SD memory cards, and an editing package to modify its personality, the latest edition to the Robosapien family - Robosapien RS Media (http://www.gizoo.co.uk/Products/ToysGames/RadioControl/RobosapienRSMedia.htm) - definitely rules the roost. The Robosapien RS Media (http://www.gizoo.co.uk/Products/ToysGames/RadioControl/RobosapienRSMedia.htm) comes complete with a camera mounted to its head, which can be displayed through the 1.9" colour LCD screen on the robot's chest. Multimedia files can be downloaded to the Robosapien RS Media (http://www.gizoo.co.uk/Products/ToysGames/RadioControl/RobosapienRSMedia.htm) through the USB port, allowing the user to view pictures and video through the LCD screen. While body movements and the user's voice can be stored multi-talented robot, downloaded music files are enjoyed through its eleven watt stereo speakers. Available at Gizoo (http://www.gizoo.co.uk) for just £299.99, main features include: Colour LCD Screen Camera mounted on Robosapien RS Media's head Interacts with other WooWee robots including Roboreptile, Robosapien V2 and Roboraptor Store and edit body movements Record and store user's voice USB port Eleven watt stereo speakers and back mounted woofer 40MB Flash Memory The Robosapien RS Media's predecessor - Robosapien V2 (http://www.gizoo.co.uk/Products/ToysGames/RadioControl/RobosapienV2.htm) - is now available from Gizoo at only £99.95 - almost £90 off the RRP! ENDS For further information and images please contact: Amy Bath on 0115 914 9118 or email: [email protected] Notes to Editors For more information on the Robosapien RS Media, please visit Gizoo (http://www.gizoo.co.uk) Gizoo (http://www.gizoo.co.uk) Having operated a website dedicated to gadgets, gifts and gizmos since 2002, the successful e-tailer Page 1 re-launched as Gizoo (http://www.gizoo.co.uk) in August 2006 and serves approximately 500,000 customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Robosapien V1 Instruction Manual
    Robosapien V1 Instruction Manual ROBOSAPIEN V2 INSTRUCTION MANUAL - SHARPER IMAGE WW252 2004 WowWee Red Metallic Robosapien V1 Humanoid Toy NO REMOTE. These are some keyword suggestions for the term "Robosapien Manual". robosapien Robosapien V1 Manual Http//wwwrobotsandcomputerscom/robots/manuals Robosapien Humanoid Robots Remote Control 14 Instruction Manual 8081. I need an instruction manual for Robosapien · Wowwee Mini. Robosapien V1's head stuck to the lefthow do i Robosapien V1 not responding to remote. PASQUALI - 995 Tractor (Parts Manual in French) · PASQUALI - 988.30 (Instructions and maintenance) Tractor (User's Guide in English) 1100 SHOP HDD2183 ROBOSAPIEN V1 SHOP SHOP S S climatiseurmobile gs model9000 RADIO. Find great deals on eBay for Robosapien in Radio-Controlled Robot Models. Shop with 3 Skittles and instructions as shown. Good overall Wowwee ROBOSAPIEN V2 LARGE 22'' ROBOT And Manual For Spares Or Repairs. £27.99. Owner's manual, instructions book, user's guide, service manual, schematics, illustrated parts lists Enter brand EN 35LE5500 Installation Manual · EN. Robosapien V1 Instruction Manual Read/Download robosapien v1 manual. add to basket These are some keyword suggestions for the term "Robosapien V1". robosapien v1 robosapien v1 instructions. Bluefruit EZ-Key Bluetooth HID Keyboard Controller v1.2. Product Code : RB-Ada-95. 1 Review(s). USD $19.95. In stock. Please wait while we. ROBOSAPIEN V2 INSTRUCTION MANUAL - SHARPER IMAGE WW252 WOWWEE RoboSapien V1 Robot Chrome Color New in sealed original box. User's guide, Instructions manual & Installation guide - Immediate download or search mode services. HANSEATIC OKO 1100 SHOP HDD2183 ROBOSAPIEN V1 SHOP SHOP S S climatiseurmobile gs model9000 RADIO OLA CEP400USO.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Stiffness Analysis of 12 Dof Poppy-Inspired Humanoid
    Design and Stiffness Analysis of 12 DoF Poppy-inspired Humanoid Dmitry Popov, Alexandr Klimchik and Ilya Afanasyev Institute of Robotics, Innopolis University, Universitetskaya Str. 1, Innopolis, Russia Keywords: Stiffness Modeling, Human Mechatronics, Motion Control Systems, Robot Kinematics. Abstract: This paper presents a low-cost anthropomorphic robot, considering its design, simulation, manufacturing and experiments. The robot design was inspired by open source Poppy Humanoid project and enhanced up to 12 DoF lower limb structure, providing additional capability to develop more natural, fast and stable biped robot walking. The current robot design has a non-spherical hip joint, that does not allow to use an analytical solution for the inverse kinematics, therefore another hybrid solution was presented. Problem of robot joint’s compliance was addressed using virtual joint method for stiffness modeling with further compensation of elas- tic deflections caused by the robot links weight. Finally, we modeled robot’s lower-part in V-REP simulator, manufactured its prototype using 3D printing technology, and implemented ZMP preview control, providing experiments with demonstration of stable biped locomotion. 1 INTRODUCTION 5 DoF leg (Lapeyre et al., 2013b). Stiffness modeling in robotics is considered for in- The progress in creation of highly specialized robotic dustrial manipulators, where problem of end-effector systems contributes to automation of different every- precise positioning under external and internal load day life aspects that can partially or fully replace hu- are critical (Pashkevich et al., 2011). In humanoid mans in the future in some routine activities. The robots accurate positioning is not always necessary, development of androids is one of the most relevant but with high compliance in links or joints, deflections solution for successful robot operations in human en- caused by payload or link weights can affect robot sta- vironment with enhanced functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Unified Humanoid Robotics Software Platform
    Unified Humanoid Robotics Software Platform McGill, Stephen G. #1, Brindza, Jordan #3, Yi, Seung-Joon #2, Lee, Daniel D. #4 #Electrical and Systems Engineering Department, University of Pennsylvania 200 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— Development of humanoid robots is increasing rapidly, and humanoids are occupying a larger percentage of robotics research. They are seen in competitions like RoboCup, as consumer toys like the RoboSapien from WowWee, and in various research and DIY community projects. Equipping these humanoid hardware platforms with simple software systems that provide basic functionality is both cumbersome and time consuming. In this paper, we present a software framework for simple humanoid behavior that abstracts away the particulars of specific humanoid hardware. Fig. 1. Various supported humanoid robotic platforms, from left: Aldabaran Nao, MiniHUBO, DARwIn LC, DARwIn HP. I. INTRODUCTION From designing and gathering components to building and II. PRIOR WORK tuning algorithms, humanoid soccer design can be a cumber- In the Robocup soccer competition, some teams do release some process. In our effort to reduce overhead in applying their code in an open source fashion [2]. However, these soft- algorithms and testing across several humanoid platforms, we ware releases are not amenable to porting from robot to robot. have developed a modularized software platform to interface In the Standard Platform League, all teams share the same the many components that are common to humanoids. robotic platform, but their code cannot be used on other robotic Our modularized platform separates low level components platforms that vary from team to team in the other Leagues that vary from robot to robot from the high level logic of RoboCup.
    [Show full text]
  • Robots and Racism: Examining Racial Bias Towards Robots Arifah Addison
    Robots and Racism: Examining Racial Bias towards Robots Arifah Addison HIT Lab New Zealand University of Canterbury Supervisors Chrisoph Bartneck (HIT Lab NZ), Kumar Yogeeswaran (Dept of Psychology) Thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Human Interface Technology June 2019 Abstract Previous studies indicate that using the `shooter bias' paradigm, people demon- strate a similar racial bias toward robots racialised as Black over robots racialised as White as they do toward humans of similar skin tones (Bartneck et al., 2018). However, such an effect could be argued to be the result of social priming. The question can also be raised of how people might respond to robots that are in the middle of the colour spectrum (i.e., brown) and whether such effects are moderated by the perceived anthropomorphism of the robots. Two experiments were conducted to examine whether shooter bias tendencies shown towards robots is driven by social priming, and whether diversification of robot colour and level of anthropomorphism influenced shooter bias. The results suggest that shooter bias is not influenced by social priming, and in- terestingly, introducing a new colour of robot removed shooter bias tendencies entirely. Contrary to expectations, the three types of robot were not perceived by the participants as having different levels of anthropomorphism. However, there were consistent differences across the three types in terms of participants' response times. Publication Co-Authorship See AppendixA for confirmation of publication and contribution details. Contents 1 Introduction and Literature Review1 1.1 Racial Bias . .2 1.2 Perception of Social Robots . .3 1.3 Current Research Questions .
    [Show full text]
  • Malachy Eaton Evolutionary Humanoid Robotics Springerbriefs in Intelligent Systems
    SPRINGER BRIEFS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, AND COGNITIVE ROBOTICS Malachy Eaton Evolutionary Humanoid Robotics SpringerBriefs in Intelligent Systems Artificial Intelligence, Multiagent Systems, and Cognitive Robotics Series editors Gerhard Weiss, Maastricht, The Netherlands Karl Tuyls, Liverpool, UK More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/11845 Malachy Eaton Evolutionary Humanoid Robotics 123 Malachy Eaton Department of Computer Science and Information Systems University of Limerick Limerick Ireland ISSN 2196-548X ISSN 2196-5498 (electronic) SpringerBriefs in Intelligent Systems ISBN 978-3-662-44598-3 ISBN 978-3-662-44599-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-44599-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2014959413 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London © The Author(s) 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing User Confidence in Privacy-Sensitive Robots by Raniah
    Increasing User Confdence in Privacy-Sensitive Robots by Raniah Abdullah Bamagain Bachelor of Science Information Technology Computing and Information Technology 2012 A thesis submitted to the College of Computer Engineering and Sciences at Florida Institute of Technology in partial fulfllment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Information Assurance and Cybersecurity Melbourne, Florida May, 2019 ⃝c Copyright 2019 Raniah Abdullah Bamagain All Rights Reserved The author grants permission to make single copies. We the undersigned committee hereby approve the attached thesis Increasing User Confdence in Privacy-Sensitive Robots by Raniah Abdullah Bamagain Marius Silaghi, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Computer Engineering and Sciences Committee Chair Hector Gutierrez, Ph.D. Professor Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering Outside Committee Member Lucas Stephane, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Computer Engineering and Sciences Committee Member Philip Bernhard, Ph.D Associate Professor and Head Department of Computer Engineering and Sciences ABSTRACT Title: Increasing User Confdence in Privacy-Sensitive Robots Author: Raniah Abdullah Bamagain Major Advisor: Marius Silaghi, Ph.D. As the deployment and availability of robots grow rapidly, and spreads everywhere to reach places where they can communicate with humans, and they can constantly sense, watch, hear, process, and record all the environment around them, numerous new benefts and services can be provided, but at the same time, various types of privacy issues appear. Indeed, the use of robots that process data remotely causes privacy concerns. There are some main factors that could increase the capabil- ity of violating the users' privacy, such as the robots' appearance, perception, or navigation capability, as well as the lack of authentication, the lack of warning sys- tem, and the characteristics of the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Control for a Humanoid- V. Janu
    CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE Faculty of Electrical Engineering BACHELOR THESIS Vojtˇech Jan˚u Motion control for a humanoid Department of Cybernetics Thesis supervisor: RNDr. Miroslav Kulich, Ph.D. Czech Technical University in Prague Faculty of Electrical Engineering Department of Cybernetics BACHELOR PROJECT ASSIGNMENT Student: Vojtěch J a n ů Study programme: Cybernetics and Robotics Specialisation: Robotics Title of Bachelor Project: Motion Control for a Humanoid Guidelines: 1. Get acquainted with ROS (Robot Operating System, http://ros.org) and Gazebo (gazebosim.org/ ). 2. Make a literature review of algorithms for motion control of a humanid robot. 3. Choose (in cooperation with the supervisor) an appropriate type of a humanoid and create/import its model into the Gazebo environment. 4. Implement the chosen algorithm for humanoid control. 5. Verify experimentaly features and behaviour of the implemented control algorithm in the Gazebo environment and the chosen robot. 6. Suggest improvements of the implemented algorithm based on experience made during implementation. Bibliography/Sources: [1] Jung-Yup Kim , Ill-Woo Park , Jun-Ho Oh: Experimental realization of dynamic walking of the biped humanoid robot KHR-2 using zero moment point feedback and inertial measurement, Advanced Robotics, Vol. 20, Iss. 6, 2006. [2] Hashimoto, K.; Takezaki, Y.; Motohashi, H.; Otani, T.; Kishi, T.; Hun-ok Lim; Takanishi, A.: "Biped walking stabilization based on gait analysis," Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on , vol., no., pp.154,159, 14-18 May 2012. [3] Qiang Huang; Yokoi, K.; Kajita, S.; Kaneko, K.; Arai, H.; Koyachi, N.; Tanie, K.: "Planning walking patterns for a biped robot," Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on, vol.17, no.3, pp.280,289, Jun 2001 [4] P.
    [Show full text]