Eelgrass Mapping Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eelgrass Mapping Review Eelgrass Mapping Review: Eelgrass Mapping Initiatives in Coastal British Columbia March 2003 For: Gretchen Harlow Canadian Wildlife Service 5421 Robertson Road Delta, B.C. V4K 3N2 By: Katherine Dunster, R.P.Bio. Dunster & Associates Environmental Consultants Ltd. P.O. Box 109 Bowen Island, B.C. V0N 1G0 25 March 2003 1 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................... 3 DEFINITIONS................................................................................................................................ 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 STUDY LIMITATIONS....................................................................................................... 5 1.2 METHODS........................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 RESULTS............................................................................................................................. 8 1.3.1 COARSE-SCALE MAPPING GAPS................................................................................ 8 1.3.2 FINE-SCALE MAPPING GAPS....................................................................................... 9 1.4 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................... 10 1.4.1 BUILDING THE WORKING GROUP NETWORK ...................................................... 10 1.4.2 LITERATURE SEARCH AND BIBLIOGRAPHY DEVELOPMENT ........................... 11 1.4.3 INFORMATION SHARING AND SECURING EXISTING INFORMATION .............. 11 1.4.4 FUNDING POSSIBILITIES AND PARTNERSHIPS..................................................... 12 1.5 SUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 12 2.0 PEOPLE CONTACTED..................................................................................................... 13 3.0 MAPPING INITIATIVES .................................................................................................. 17 3.1 COARSE-SCALE (REGIONAL) MAPPING PROJECTS................................................. 17 3.2 FINE-SCALE (LOCAL) M APPING PROJECTS .............................................................. 17 3.3 EELGRASS RESTORATION PROJECTS........................................................................ 17 3.4 HISTORICAL EELGRASS MAPPING PROJECTS......................................................... 18 3.5 EELGRASS RESEARCH PROJECTS/THESES ............................................................... 19 4.0 INVENTORY..................................................................................................................... 20 4.1 CONTINENTAL SLOPE........................................................................................................ 21 4.2 DIXON ENTRANCE .............................................................................................................. 23 4.3 HECATE STRAIT.................................................................................................................. 25 4.5 NORTH COAST FJORDS...................................................................................................... 29 4.6 QUEEN CHARLOTTE STRAIT............................................................................................ 37 4.7 JOHNSTONE STRAIT........................................................................................................... 41 4.8 STRAIT OF GEORGIA.......................................................................................................... 47 4.9 JUAN DE FUCA STRAIT....................................................................................................... 83 4.10 VANCOUVER ISLAND SHELF........................................................................................... 85 2 Table of Figures Figure 1. Marine Ecosections of British Columbia (source: LUCO)........................................ 7 Figure 2. Continental Slope Area. .......................................................................................... 21 Figure 3. Dixon Entrance Area. .............................................................................................. 23 Figure 4. Hecate Strait Area................................................................................................... 25 Figure 5. Queen Charlotte Sound Area. ................................................................................ 27 Figure 6. North Coast Fjords Area. ........................................................................................ 29 Figure 7. Queen Charlotte Strait Area. .................................................................................. 37 Figure 8. Johnstone Strait Area. ............................................................................................ 41 Figure 9. Strait of Georgia Area. ............................................................................................ 47 Figure 10. Juan de Fuca Strait Area. ....................................................................................... 83 Figure 11. Vancouver Island Shelf Area .................................................................................. 85 Acknowledgement Figures 2 through 11 are adapted from Canadian Hydrographic Chart L/C 3000, Juan de Fuca Strait to Dixon Entrance 1: 1 250 000, 1994. 3 ACRONYMS CMPB Coast and Marine Planning Branch, MSRM CWS Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada DFO Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada IOS Institute of Oceanographic Sciences LRMP Land Resource Management Plan LUCO Land Use Coordination Office, now in part Decision Support Services of the Resource Management Division, MSRM. LWBC Land and Water British Columbia MAFF B.C. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food MSRM B.C. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management NGO Non-governmental Organisation OCP Official Community Plan PBS Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo (DFO) RLUP Regional Land Use Plan DEFINITIONS Eelgrass Eelgrass (Zostera marina and Zostera japonica ). Z. japonica is an introduced non- native species. Foreshore (intertidal) area The area between the mean high tide and low tide mark (i.e. below zero tide). Fine-scale Fine-scale maps (also known as large-scale maps) depict a small geographic area, with a large amount of detail. Intertidal The shore zone between the mean low water and the mean high water mark. The substrate is exposed and flooded by tides. Nearshore The subtidal area below low tide mark (i.e. below zero tide), generally extending to the 20 metre isobathymetric depth. Seagrass Eelgrass (Zostera marina and Zostera japonica ) and surfgrass (Phyllospadix scouleri and Phyllospadix torreyi). Coarse-scale Coarse-scale maps (also known as small-scale maps) depict a large geographic area, with a small amount of detail. 4 1.0 Introduction Since the turn of the millennium there has been an upsurge in grassroots interest in mapping and monitoring coastal eelgrass beds at the local level. Linked to that interest is the finite amount of funding, resources and support staff available to support grassroots initiatives. The overarching need for this review was to determine where there are geographical gaps in our knowledge of fine-scale eelgrass distribution throughout coastal B.C. In order to determine where new efforts should be focussed, it is important to know what work has already been initiated, and what areas are in most need of assistance due to resource management and other pressures. Three questions were asked: Where has eelgrass mapping been completed? And conversely, where has little or no eelgrass mapping been done? The answer to the first question forms Section 4.0 of this report, while the answer to the second question is summarized in Section 1.3 (Results) and Section 1.4 (Recommendations) below. Once the gaps were determined, the third question attempted to ask what areas most urgently needed mapping assistance or help organizing a mapping initiative, and what areas were under the most pressure (for example, finfish or shellfish aquaculture expansion, harbour development)? During the course of this project it became apparent that in addition to finding answers to the two mapping questions, it would also be worthwhile documenting eelgrass restoration and eelgrass research projects in each marine ecoregion. Eelgrass restoration projects date back to around 1990, and there are several reasons for keeping track of where they have been done: 1) to ensure that contemporary mapping, monitoring and restoration projects are cognizant of the locations of previous restoration efforts; 2) to allow grassroots groups and others to continue monitoring restoration projects in their areas long after “official” or statutory monitoring has ended; and 3) to provide contemporary restoration projects with a local benchmark for comparative purposes. The eelgrass research category is a start at documenting the research efforts of universities, government agencies and industry. The projects in the 1980’s and 1990’s have for the most part provided insight into marine vegetation inventory, mapping and classification techniques. The results are often useful to contemporary eelgrass mappers because the plot data from research sites provide both historical context and valuable information about
Recommended publications
  • Gary's Charts
    Gary’s Garage Sale - Chart List Chart Number Chart Name Area Scale Condition Price 3410 Sooke Inlet West Coast Vancouver Island 1:20 000 Good $ 10.00 3415 Victoria Harbour East Coast Vancouver Island 1:6 000 Poor Free 3441 Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and Sattelite Channel East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 2.50 3441 Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and Sattelite Channel East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3441 Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and Sattelite Channel East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Poor Free 3442 North Pender Island to Thetis Island East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 2.50 3442 North Pender Island to Thetis Island East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3443 Thetis Island to Nanaimo East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3459 Nanoose Harbour East Vancouver Island 1:15 000 Fair $ 5.00 3463 Strait of Georgia East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 7.50 3537 Okisollo Channel East Coast Vancouver Island 1:20 000 Good $ 10.00 3537 Okisollo Channel East Coast Vancouver Island 1:20 000 Fair $ 5.00 3538 Desolation Sound & Sutil Channel East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 2.50 3539 Discovery Passage East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Poor Free 3541 Approaches to Toba Inlet East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3545 Johnstone Strait - Port Neville to Robson Bight East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Good $ 10.00 3546 Broughton Strait East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3549 Queen Charlotte Strait East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Excellent $ 15.00 3549 Queen Charlotte Strait East
    [Show full text]
  • List of Persons Entitled to Vote
    40 Vic. Voters' List—New Westminster District. 35 LIST OF PERSONS ENTITLED TO VOTE IN THE ELECTORAL DISTRICT OF NEW WESTMINSTER. Residence of Claimant, with full descrip­ Christian name and surname of Claimant tion of house, if in a town, with num­ Profession, trade, or calling. at full length. ber, if any, and name of street. Ashwell, George Randall., Chilliwhack ..... Farmer Arthur, James... Centreville Farmer Arthur, James Henry Centreville Farmer Anderson, Peter Lonzo ... Sumass Farmer Anderson, Jacob Langley Prairie Farmer Aitkins, James Langley Farmer Barker, Henry Sumass , Farmer Barker, William Henry Sumass Farmer 9 Barker, John Chilliwhack Farmer 10 Blanchard, John Albert ... Chilliwhack Farmer 11 Banford, George Chilliwhack Farmer 12 Bell, William Chilliwhack Farmer 13 Bell, John Chilliwhack Farmer 14 Bakeson, Henry Harrison River Farmer 15 Beary, John Chilliwhack Farmer 16 Bicknell, Charles Chilliwhack Parmer 17 Burr, Joseph Jr New Westminster District. Carpenter 18 Bremridge, William New Westminster District. Farmer 19 Brough, John Keatzie Farmer 20 Brewer, William John , Mud Bay Farmer 21 Brown, George Pitt River Farmer 22 Boyd, Hugh North Arm Farmer 23 Betts, Elijah John , North Arm Farmer 24 Browne, Edward Sloone.., North Arm Farmer 25 Booth, James William South Arm Farmer 26 Benton, Henry Dean South Arm Farmer 27 Byron, George South Arm Farmer 28 Bales, Henry Pennington, Farmer 29 Barnes, John Matsqui ; Farmer 30 Burton, Ralph Matsqui Farmer 31 Baker, Peter Langley Farmer 32 Boake, Benjamin , Langley Faimer 33 Burr, William Henry Langley Farmer - 34 Boake, Wellington E , Langley Farmer 35 Barnes, Merton Philip , Boundary Bay Farmer 36 Barnes, Samuel William.. Boundary Bay Farmer 37 Bell, James New Westminster District , Stonemason 38 Craswell, John Chilliwhack Farmer 39 Cotton, James W Chilliwhack Farmer 40 Chadsey, George Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Regional Guide Cat
    National Marine Weather Guide British Columbia Regional Guide Cat. No. En56-240/3-2015E-PDF 978-1-100-25953-6 Terms of Usage Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; • Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) or 819-997-2800 or email to [email protected]. Disclaimer: Her Majesty is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in the reproduced material. Her Majesty shall at all times be indemnified and held harmless against any and all claims whatsoever arising out of negligence or other fault in the use of the information contained in this publication or product. Photo credits Cover Left: Chris Gibbons Cover Center: Chris Gibbons Cover Right: Ed Goski Page I: Ed Goski Page II: top left - Chris Gibbons, top right - Matt MacDonald, bottom - André Besson Page VI: Chris Gibbons Page 1: Chris Gibbons Page 5: Lisa West Page 8: Matt MacDonald Page 13: André Besson Page 15: Chris Gibbons Page 42: Lisa West Page 49: Chris Gibbons Page 119: Lisa West Page 138: Matt MacDonald Page 142: Matt MacDonald Acknowledgments Without the works of Owen Lange, this chapter would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • MALCOLM ISLAND ADVISORY COMMISSION (MIAC) Meeting Notes August 26, 2019 Old Medical Building, 270 1St Street, Sointula, BC
    MALCOLM ISLAND ADVISORY COMMISSION (MIAC) Meeting Notes August 26, 2019 Old Medical Building, 270 1st Street, Sointula, BC PRESENT: Sandra Daniels, RDMW Electoral “A” Director Carmen Burrows, Sheila Roote, Joy Davidson, Dennis Swanson, Michelle Pottage, Roger Lanqvist ABSENT: Chris Chateauvert, Guy Carlson Patrick Donaghy - Manager of Operations Jeff Long - Manager of Planning & Development Services PUBLIC: None CALL TO ORDER Chair Carmen Burrows called the meeting to order at 7:18 PM. MIAC ADOPTION OF AGENDA 2019/08/26 Motion 1: Agenda 1. Agenda for the August 26, 2019 MIAC meeting. approved Motion that the June 24, 2019 MIAC agenda be approved (with the following additions: ▪ Old Business o Letter of support to BC Ferries in favour of new schedule for the new ferry with an early morning sailing from Sointula to Port McNeill o Zoning ▪ New Business o Rural Islands Economic Forum Nov 7-8, 2019 o Public posting/notices of meeting dates o Mailing address for MIAC o Roads o NWCC (New Way Community Caring) M.S. Carried MIAC 2019/08/26 Motion 2: ADOPTION OF July 29, 2019 MINUTES Minutes approved M.S. Carried PUBLIC DELEGATIONS: None Regional District of Mount Waddington 1 Minutes of the MIAC Meeting OLD BUSINESS: - Community knotweed meeting: o Date is yet to be set, awaiting confirmation from Patrick regarding availability of staff/contractors for meeting – September - BC Ferries letter. o Dennis provided a draft of a letter to BC Ferries expressing the MIAC supporting a revised schedule for the new ferry. The revised schedule would include an early morning ferry sailing to Port McNeill leaving shortly after 7 AM.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nitrogen Budget for the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, with Emphasis on Particulate Nitrogen and Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen
    Biogeosciences, 10, 7179–7194, 2013 Open Access www.biogeosciences.net/10/7179/2013/ doi:10.5194/bg-10-7179-2013 Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. A nitrogen budget for the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, with emphasis on particulate nitrogen and dissolved inorganic nitrogen J. N. Sutton1,2, S. C. Johannessen1, and R. W. Macdonald1 1Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 9860 West Saanich Road, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, V8L 4B2, Canada 2Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA Correspondence to: J. N. Sutton ([email protected]) Received: 6 March 2013 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 23 April 2013 Revised: 29 September 2013 – Accepted: 10 October 2013 – Published: 12 November 2013 Abstract. Balanced budgets for dissolved inorganic N (DIN) 1 Introduction and particulate N (PN) were constructed for the Strait of Georgia (SoG), a semi-enclosed coastal sea off the west coast of British Columbia, Canada. The dominant control on the The nitrogen (N) cycle is a crucial underpinning of marine N budget is the advection of DIN into and out of the SoG biological productivity (Gruber and Galloway, 2008). Dur- via Haro Strait. The annual influx of DIN by advection from ing the past 150 yr, the global N cycle has been dramati- the Pacific Ocean is 29 990 (±19 500) Mmol yr−1. The DIN cally changed by human activities that have loaded reactive N flux advected out of the SoG is 24 300 (±15 500) Mmol yr−1. into ecosystems in amounts that rival natural sources (Rabal- Most of the DIN that enters the SoG (∼ 23 400 Mmol yr−1) ais, 2002; Galloway et al., 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Order in Council 522/1947
    522. Approved and ordered this 21st day of March , A.D. 1947. At the Executive Council Chamber, Victoria, PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Hart in the Chair. Mr. Pearson Mr. Wismer Mr. Kenney mr.Anscomb Mr. Putnam Mr. MacDonald Mr. C arson mr. Eyres Mr. Weir Mr. To His Honour The Lieutenant-Governor in Council: The undersigned has the honour to recommend: 30,4/11b- THAT the Vital Statistics Registration District of Powell River as de- scribed by notice in The British Columbia Casette under date of August 25th, 1930 be redefined as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the middle line of Malaspina Strait with the southerly prolongation of the middle line of Jervis Inlet; thence north-easterly to and along said middle line and that of Hotham Sound and continu- ing northerly in Baker Bay to the south-west corner of Lot 3557, Group 1, New Westminster Land District; thence due west to the westerly boundary of the water- shed of the streams flowing into Jervis Inlet; thence northerly along said boundary to and along the easterly boundary of the watershed of Toba River to the Cascade Mountains, as defined by the "Interpretation Act Amendment Act, 1936"; thence north-westerly along said Cascade Mountains to the northerly boundary of the watershed of Toba River; thence westerly along said boundary and that of the streams flowing southerly into Toba Inlet; to the easterly boundary of the water- shed of Brom River; thence southerly along said boundary to the most southerly point thereon which lies due north of Lot 976, Range 1, Coast Land
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE BIRD SURVEYS in QC STRAIT-Final
    MARINE BIRD SURVEYS IN QUEEN CHARLOTTE STRAIT AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2020 December 2020 2 MARINE BIRD SURVEYS IN QUEEN CHARLOTTE STRAIT AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2020 Anthony Gaston, Mark Maftei, Sonya Pastran, Ken Wright, Graham Sorenson, Iwan Lewylle Cite as: Gaston AJ, M Maftei, S Pastran, K Wright, G Sorenson and I Lewylle. 2020. MARINE BIRD SURVEYS IN QUEEN CHARLOTTE STRAIT AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2020. Raincoast Education Society, Tofino, BC. 3 1084 Pacific Rim Highway, Tofino, BC (https://raincoasteducation.org/) 4 CONTENTS Introduction 7 Methods Field methods 10 Analysis 13 Results Distribution by zones 16 Total numbers of birds present 17 Timing of arrival/migration Sea ducks 18 Phalaropes 18 Auks 20 Gulls 20 Loons 21 Grebes 22 Petrels 23 Cormorants 23 Comparison with other studies 24 Marine Mammals 26 Discussion Total numbers of birds 28 Timing of arrival/migration 29 Summary 29 Acknowledgements 31 References 32 Appendices 35 5 6 INTRODUCTION Queen Charlotte Strait, a funnel-shaped passage extending ESE from the open waters of Queen Charlotte Sound, separates northern Vancouver Island from the mainland of British Columbia. It is connected, via Johnstone Strait, Discovery Passage and associated channels, with the more or less enclosed waters of the Salish Sea (Figure 1). Anecdotal information from eBird lists suggests that this area supports a high diversity of marine birds in winter and during the periods of northward and southward migration (https://ebird.org/canada/ accessed 7 November 2020; hereafter “eBird”). In addition, this area is important for marine mammals, being used regularly by the Northern Resident Orca stock, and by Humpback and Minke Whales, Dall’s and Harbour Porpoises and Pacific White-sided Dolphins, and supporting several permanent haul-outs of Steller’s Sea Lions (Ford 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Clayoquot Sound)
    .. Catalogue of Salmon Streams and Spawning Escapements of Statistical Area 24 ( Clayoquot Sound) R.F Brown, M.J. Comfort, & D.E. Marshall . Fisheries &Oceans Enhancement Services Branch 1090 West Pender St. Vancouver. B. C. V6E 2P1 December 1979 Fisheries & Marine Service Data Report No. 80 Fisheries and Marine Service Data Reports These reports provide a medium for filing and archiving data compilations where little or no analysis is included. Such compilations commonly will have been prepared in support of other journal publications or reports. The subject matter of Data Reports reflects the broad interests and policies of the Fisheries and M arine Service, namely, fisheries management, technology and development, ocean sciences, and aquatic environments relevant to Canada. Numbers 1-25 in this series were issued as Fisheries and Marine Service Data Records by the Pacific Biological Station, N anaimo, B.C The series name was changed with report number 26. Data Reports are not intended for general distribution and the contents must not be referred to in other publications without prior written clearance from the Issuing establishment. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Service des peches et de la mer Rapports statistiques Ces rapports servent de base a la compilation des donnees de classel11ent et d'archives pour lesquelles iI y a peu ou point d'analyse. Celte compilation aura d'ordinaire ete preparee pour appuyer d'autres publications ou rapports. Les sujets des Rapports statistiques refietent la vaste gamme des interets et politiques du Service des peches et de la mer, notamment gestion des peches, techniques et developpement, sciences oceaniques et environnements aquatiques, au Canada .
    [Show full text]
  • Erasing Indigenous Indigeneity in Vancouver
    Erasing Indigenous Indigeneity in Vancouver J EAN BARMAN1 anada has become increasingly urban. More and more people choose to live in cities and towns. Under a fifth did so in 1871, according to the first census to be held after Canada C 1867 1901 was formed in . The proportion surpassed a third by , was over half by 1951, and reached 80 percent by 2001.2 Urbanization has not benefited Canadians in equal measure. The most adversely affected have been indigenous peoples. Two reasons intersect: first, the reserves confining those deemed to be status Indians are scattered across the country, meaning lives are increasingly isolated from a fairly concentrated urban mainstream; and second, the handful of reserves in more densely populated areas early on became coveted by newcomers, who sought to wrest them away by licit or illicit means. The pressure became so great that in 1911 the federal government passed legislation making it possible to do so. This article focuses on the second of these two reasons. The city we know as Vancouver is a relatively late creation, originating in 1886 as the western terminus of the transcontinental rail line. Until then, Burrard Inlet, on whose south shore Vancouver sits, was home to a handful of newcomers alongside Squamish and Musqueam peoples who used the area’s resources for sustenance. A hundred and twenty years later, apart from the hidden-away Musqueam Reserve, that indigenous presence has disappeared. 1 This article originated as a paper presented to the Canadian Historical Association, May 2007. I am grateful to all those who commented on it and to Robert A.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright (C) Queen's Printer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    B.C. Reg. 38/2016 O.C. 112/2016 Deposited February 29, 2016 effective February 29, 2016 Water Sustainability Act WATER DISTRICTS REGULATION Note: Check the Cumulative Regulation Bulletin 2015 and 2016 for any non-consolidated amendments to this regulation that may be in effect. Water districts 1 British Columbia is divided into the water districts named and described in the Schedule. Schedule Water Districts Alberni Water District That part of Vancouver Island together with adjacent islands lying southwest of a line commencing at the northwest corner of Fractional Township 42, Rupert Land District, being a point on the natural boundary of Fisherman Bay; thence in a general southeasterly direction along the southwesterly boundaries of the watersheds of Dakota Creek, Laura Creek, Stranby River, Nahwitti River, Quatse River, Keogh River, Cluxewe River and Nimpkish River to the southeasterly boundary of the watershed of Nimpkish River; thence in a general northeasterly direction along the southeasterly boundary of the watershed of Nimpkish River to the southerly boundary of the watershed of Salmon River; thence in a general easterly direction along the southerly boundary of the watershed of Salmon River to the southwesterly boundary thereof; thence in a general southeasterly direction along the southwesterly boundaries of the watersheds of Salmon River and Campbell River to the southerly boundary of the watershed of Campbell River; thence in a general easterly direction along the southerly boundaries of the watersheds of Campbell River and
    [Show full text]
  • You Are in Wolf and Cougar Country
    t Keep Predators Wild & Wary ... Stay Safe! Parks Canada needs YOUR help to If you encounter a wolf or cougar: prevent people-predator conflicts and Are People at Risk? • Pick up small children. to keep our predators wild! Cougars very rarely prey on people. Children and crouching adults are more at • Gather the group together. risk of attack as they more closely resemble prey. People on their own are also • Do not run. Wolves and cougars are native to Vancouver Island, more at risk than groups of people. Wolf attacks are even rarer. • Do not crouch down. and as predators, are vital to a healthy coastal In this region, there have been three cougar attacks. In each case children were • Make and maintain eye contact. ecosystem. They may be encountered anywhere in attacked: one on the West Coast Trail in 1985, one fatal attack just outside the • Wave your arms and shout. Pacific Rim National Park Reserve. National parks are park in Clayoquot Sound in 1989 and another at Kennedy Lake in 2011. • Do all you can to appear larger and to scare the great places to view wildlife in their natural habitat. animal away. However, once animals become accustomed to In 2000, a wolf that had obtained food from previous campers, attacked a © Parks Canada / Josh McCulloch 2009 • Avoid scaring the animal into the path of other © Parks Canada / Josh McCulloch 2004 sleeping man by a campfire in Clayoquot Sound. people they are in danger of losing their wildness. Keep kids close. people. The repeated presence of humans that brings no Keep kayak hatches secure.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Waterbird Population Trends in the Strait of Georgia 1999–2011: Results from the First 12 Years of the British Columbia Coastal Waterbird Survey
    8 Coastal waterbird trends - Crewe et al. Coastal waterbird population trends in the Strait of Georgia 1999–2011: Results from the first 12 years of the British Columbia Coastal Waterbird Survey Tara Crewe1, Karen Barry2, Pete Davidson2,3, Denis Lepage1 1 Bird Studies Canada - National Headquarters, PO Box. 160, Port Rowan, Ont. N0E 1M0 2 Bird Studies Canada – British Columbia Program, 5421 Robertson Road, RR1, Delta, B.C. V4K 3N2; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Corresponding author Abstract: The British Columbia Coastal Waterbird Survey is a citizen science long-term monitoring program implemented by Bird Studies Canada to assess population trends and ecological needs of waterbirds using the province’s coastal and inshore marine habitats. Standard monthly counts from more than 200 defined sites within the Strait of Georgia were analysed using route-regression techniques to estimate population indices and assess trends in 57 waterbird species over a 12-year period spanning the non-breeding periods from 1999–2000 to 2010–11. A power analysis was also conducted to validate the rigor of the survey design. Results indicate that the survey is detecting annual changes of 3% or less for populations of 29 waterbirds of a wide variety of guilds. Thirty-three species showed stable populations or no trend, 22 species showed significantly declining trends, and just three species showed significant increasing trends. We evaluate these results in the context of other long-term monitoring initiatives in the Salish Sea, highlighting specific birds to watch from a conservation perspective. Among those that showed a declining trend were a guild of piscivores, including Western and Horned Grebes, Common, Red-throated and Pacific Loons, and Rhinoceros Auklet; several sea ducks (Black and White-winged Scoters, Long-tailed Duck, Barrow’s Goldeneye, Harlequin Duck); two shorebirds (Dunlin, Surfbird); and Great Blue Heron.
    [Show full text]