DOCSLIB.ORG

Neil Macfarlane

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neil Macfarlane briefing paper Post-Revolutionary Georgia on the Edge? S. Neil MacFarlane Russia and Eurasia Programme | March 2011 | REP BP 2011/01 Summary points From the Rose Revolution in 2003 to the war with Russia and financial crisis of 2008, Georgia achieved impressive macroeconomic results. Government reforms reduced petty corruption and criminal violence markedly. Rapid progress was made in the delivery of public goods. The investment climate improved. President Mikheil Saakashvili has weathered the fallout of the war with Russia. Weak opposition and substantial Western aid have enabled the government to stabilize the economy and consolidate its political position. However, positive headline macroeconomic results may not be sustainable and mask persistent concerns regarding poor performance in combating poverty, unemployment and increasing inequality. Human rights continue to be a problem. The government cuts corners on democracy and the rule of law. Media freedoms remain constrained. Civil and parliamentary oversight of governmental decisions is limited, and the judicial system is subject to political interference. The abuse of state power and enduring poverty and inequality risk alienating the population and increasing social tension. There is therefore reason to question the sustainability of Georgia’s economic model and the stability of the post-war political situation. www.chathamhouse.org.uk Post-Revolutionary Georgia on the Edge? 2 e g a p Introduction economy shrank in 2008–09, it began to recover the In August 2008, Georgia lost a short but a disastrous war following year, despite the global economic downturn. with Russia over South Ossetia and Abkhazia. The two The opposition, after several months of street territories under separatist control were occupied by the demonstrations, melted away amid internecine quar - Russian army, more or less definitively detached from relling. The government’s candidate was elected by a Georgia, and recognized by Russia as independent states. substantial margin in Tbilisi mayoral elections in May Much of the Georgian army was destroyed. The war also 2010, as part of a countrywide sweep of local elections damaged Georgia’s relations with its major patrons, the by the ruling United National Movement (UNM). United States and the European Union. Both took the view Georgia’s parliament has adopted a series of constitu - that the Georgian government bore a significant portion of tional reforms that lay the basis for the continued responsibility for the conflict, and for complicating their political survival and power of the ruling group. own relations with Russia. In their efforts to restart the Russian relationship, Georgia appeared to be a liability. The war faced Georgia with substantial economic There is substantial reason to losses, while generating additional demands on the q‘uestion the sustainability of public exchequer. War damage needed to be made good and the government faced the responsibility to feed and Georgia’s economic model and house large numbers of displaced persons. These the stability of the post-war economic effects appeared just as the impact of the political outcom e global economic crisis began to bite. The government’s ’ investment-led growth strategy was jeopardized both by general global economic uncertainty and by the impact of the war on investor confidence. However, the government’s apparent success in post- In political terms, the popular tendency to support war stabilization and its striking capacity to survive in the nation and to rally around the leader in a time of such difficult conditions mask a more complex reality. crisis allowed President Mikheil Saakashvili to survive There is substantial reason to question the sustain - Georgia’s decisive military defeat. However, in subse - ability of Georgia’s economic model and the stability of quent months opposition challenges grew. By early the post-war political outcome. 2009, many were writing the current government off. This briefing paper explores this theme in two parts: Georgia has done surprisingly well since then. Russia an analysis of economic trends; and a consideration of has not followed up to attempt to remove Georgia’s the country’s recent political development. Each part government. The other members of the Commonwealth examines first the state’s performance in the period of Independent States (CIS) and the Collective Security 2003–08 and then considers trends since the war. Treaty Organization (CSTO) did not endorse Russia’s 1 actions and none has joined it in recognizing the sover - The Georgian economy eignty of the territories that it detached from Georgia. Western countries and organizations donated huge sums Rebuilding the Georgian economy, 2003–08 to assist Georgia’s post-war recovery, especially to accel - At the time of the Rose Revolution in 2003, Georgia’s erate the government’s substantial programme of economy was crumbling. In the judgment of the infrastructural modernization. Although the Georgian World Bank, 1 Analysis of Georgian economic data can be difficult because many of the statistics are generated in the National Statistics Office, which is not fully inde - pendent, creating a risk of motivated bias in the data. The approach taken here is to rely on a balance of international agencies (e.g. the IMF, World Bank and UNDP), which may be sufficient to generate a reasonably accurate picture. www.chathamhouse.org.uk Post-Revolutionary Georgia on the Edge? 3 e g a p By 2003, reform momentum sputtered to a halt, and GDP in 2002 to 25.7% in 2008. The (public) external Georgia was a near failed state. Political power was debt-to-GNI (gross national income) ratio declined increasingly fragmented, corruption and crime were dramatically from 54% in 2003 to 22% in 2007. Net rampant, there were massive arrears in pension payments foreign direct investment (FDI) rose from $160.2 and teachers’ salaries, and infrastructure was in a state of million to $1.75 billion annually in 2007, reflecting both near collapse, with most of the country without power the increasing ease of doing business in Georgia and and the road network increasingly deteriorated. 2 also growing investor confidence, which pushed inflows up while reducing outflows. 5 Major international agencies were reducing their financial The World Bank summarizes: commitments to Georgia or, in the case of the Inter- national Monetary Fund (IMF), walking away entirely. Since 2003, Georgia has implemented an impressive array The post-revolutionary government embraced these of reforms. These reforms are reflected in the pronounced challenges. In the first years after the 2003 revolution, political, social and economic transformations following petty corruption was substantially reduced. The the ‘Rose Revolution’ at the end of 2003. The processes government adopted and then enforced a new simpli - since the start of reforms can be qualified as unique in fied tax code and tightened up on customs and excise, terms of the speed of reforms, degree of innovations, and while clawing considerable amounts of money back extent of institutional restructuring. The reforms are from those who had benefited from the previous era’s recognized to have noticeably improved the institutional corrupt practices. It also simplified procedures for the environment, provided a basis for sustained economic establishment of new businesses and for foreign direct growth and human capital accumulation, and increased investment. International approval of both the revolu - multifold foreign direct investments. 6 tion and the direction of travel brought significant additional resources into the economy. 3 This involved This conclusion is consistent with the rapid rise of not only the resumption of IMF and therefore World Georgia up the ranks of the World Bank’s Doing Bank funding, but also substantial growth in funding Business index to its current global position of 12th. 7 from the United States and EU/European Bank for The country is singled out for having made more Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). progress than any other reforming economy in the The macroeconomic results were extremely positive. period 2006–10. In the years prior to the war, gross domestic product Whereas the headline macroeconomic performance (GDP) increased from $4 billion in 2003 to $12.8 billion looked very good, it was not obviously better than that of in 2008. The per capita shift was from $772 in 2002 to Georgia’s Southern Caucasian neighbours during the $2,919 in 2008. 4 The GDP growth rate rose from 5.5% in same period (2004–08). Moreover, the headlines have 2002 to 12.3% in 2007. State revenue grew from 10.5% of obscured a number of persistent concerns. For example, 2 World Bank, Georgia: Implementation Completion and Results Report – Poverty Reduction Support Operations I-IV (Washington, DC: World Bank), 23 December 2009), p. 1. Available at http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/01/13/000334955_20100113015515/ Rendered/PDF/ICR10180Multip1C0disclosed011111101.pdf. Accessed 30 December 2010. 3 For a full analysis, see S. Neil MacFarlane, ‘Georgia and the Political Economy of State-Building’, forthcoming in Mats Berdal and Dominik Zaum, eds, The Political Economy of State-Building (provisional title). 4 In terms of purchasing power parity, this translates into US$2,960 in 2003 and US$4,860 in 2008. 5 These data are all in current US dollars and are taken from World Bank Data Indicators. The longitudinal data are available at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD/countries?page=1. Accessed 30 December 2010. 6 World Bank, Georgia: Poverty Assessment, April 2009 , Report 44400-GE (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009). Available at http://www- wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2009/04/29/000350881_20090429111740/Rendered/PDF/444000ESW0P1071C 0Disclosed041281091.pdf. Accessed 2 December 2009. 7 World Bank, Doing Business 2011: Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010). Available at http://www.doingbusiness.org/ ~/media/FPDKM/Doing%20Business/Documents/Annual-Reports/English/DB11-FullReport.pdf. Accessed 9 March 2011.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia-Georgia Relations
    russian analytical russian analytical digest 68/09 digest the moment. So are specific steps aimed at resolving the usually are not focused on activities that cannot bring Abkhazia and South Ossetia conflicts. Harm reduction anything tangible in the short run. is the only realistic policy objective in that area. As to the long run, one should admit that nobody At the same time, Georgia cannot afford to lose ties can confidently predict what will be happening in the to the people who live in Abkhazia and South Ossetia region in ten–fifteen years time or beyond that. Georgia now – whatever political attitudes they may have. This has too much on its hands right now to be too involved is not easy, but Georgians – both in government and in speculations about it. It is rational to focus on ob- in society – should be creative and inventive on this jectives that can be achieved and not allow things that point. Apart from technical impediments for such con- cannot be changed for the time being to get one de- tacts, the trick is that there can be no short-term politi- pressed. cal advantages coming from such contacts, and people About the Author: Professor Ghia Nodia is the Director of the School of Caucasus Studies at Ilia Chavchavadze State University in Tbilisi, Georgia and chairman of the Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development, a Georgian think-tank. Georgian Attitudes to Russia: Surprisingly Positive By Hans Gutbrod and Nana Papiashvili, Tbilisi Abstract What do Georgians think about Russia? What relationship would they like to have with their northern neighbor? And what do they think about the August conflict? Data collected by the Caucasus Research Resource Center (CRRC) allows a nuanced answer to these questions: although Georgians have a very crit- ical view of Russia’s role in the August conflict, they continue to desire a good political relationship with their northern neighbor, as long as this is not at the expense of close ties with the West.
    [Show full text]
  • N E W S L E T T E R
    Schools of Political Studies ISSUE 1, November 2012 ISSUE 0, October 2012 N E W S L E T T E R ISSUE 1 , November 2012 ISSUE 0, October 2012 Letter from the Director of Policy Planning, Council of HUNDREDS OF SCHOOL PARTICIPANTS AT THE FIRST Europe WORLD FORUM FOR DEMOCRACY Over 500 participants from the Schools of Political Studies converged on Strasbourg to join in the first World Forum I am delighted to preface this first issue of the Schools of Political for Democracy (5-11 October 2012). In addition to Studies’ Newsletter as I am convinced that the Schools are uniquely- attending the different events of the Forum, the placed to help build a Europe based on the core values of the Council participants exchanged views with their peers in regional of Europe. The aim of this quarterly Newsletter is to bring the meetings of Schools and achievements of the Schools to a wider audience thereby reinforcing a met their country’s sustainable and well-informed support network. judges from the European Court of Human Rights. The links between the Council of Europe and the Schools of Political Meanwhile the Secretary General of the Council of Studies create a win – win situation: the Council of Europe has gained Europe held several better access to tomorrow’s leaders and decision-makers and more meetings with the visibility amongst the population at large; whilst the Schools are Directors of the Schools assured their political independence and offer high standards of and hosted the diploma award ceremony. training and capacity-building thanks to the umbrella protection of the Council of Europe ‘label’.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Owned Georgia Eng.Pdf
    By Paul Rimple This book is about the businessmen and the companies who own significant shares in broadcasting, telecommunications, advertisement, oil import and distribution, pharmaceutical, privatisation and mining sectors. Furthermore, It describes the relationship and connections between the businessmen and companies with the government. Included is the information about the connections of these businessmen and companies with the government. The book encompases the time period between 2003-2012. At the time of the writing of the book significant changes have taken place with regards to property rights in Georgia. As a result of 2012 Parliamentary elections the ruling party has lost the majority resulting in significant changes in the business ownership structure in Georgia. Those changes are included in the last chapter of this book. The project has been initiated by Transparency International Georgia. The author of the book is journalist Paul Rimple. He has been assisted by analyst Giorgi Chanturia from Transparency International Georgia. Online version of this book is available on this address: http://www.transparency.ge/ Published with the financial support of Open Society Georgia Foundation The views expressed in the report to not necessarily coincide with those of the Open Society Georgia Foundation, therefore the organisation is not responsible for the report’s content. WHO OWNED GEORGIA 2003-2012 By Paul Rimple 1 Contents INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Javakheti After the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia
    Javakheti after the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia Hedvig Lohm ECMI Working Paper #38 April 2007 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) ECMI Headquarters: Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg Germany +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 Internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #38 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller Copyright 2007 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in April 2007 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ISSN: 1435-9812 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................4 II. JAVAKHETI IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC TERMS ...........................................................5 1. The Current Socio-Economic Situation .............................................................................6 2. Transformation of Agriculture ...........................................................................................8 3. Socio-Economic Dependency on Russia .......................................................................... 10 III. DIFFERENT ACTORS IN JAVAKHETI ................................................................... 12 1. Tbilisi influence on Javakheti .......................................................................................... 12 2. Role of Armenia and Russia ............................................................................................. 13 3. International
    [Show full text]
  • The EU's Eastern Policy in Light of the Georgian Conflict and the Gas
    The EU’s Eastern Policy in light of the Georgian Conflict and the Gas War Abstract The EU is seeking to develop its relations with former ex-Soviet republics at a time of growing Russian opposition to the expansion of Western influence into what it considers its sphere of influence, coupled with increased tensions between Russia and some of the other former Soviet states. The EU should not accept the concept of a Russian sphere of influence in Eastern Europe. The circumstances leading to the Second World War and the Cold War have made it clear that the same principles of international law, and national sovereignty, must apply throughout the continent. Furthermore, the Georgian conflict and the Russo-Ukrainian gas war have shown that the state of Russia’s relations with its neighbours can adversely affect EU interests. Furthermore, there is a danger of a renewal of the Georgia conflict and of further interruptions of the Russian gas transiting Ukraine. The EU should therefore make the state of Russia’s relations with its neighbours a factor in the EU’s co-operation with Russia. For the EU to influence most effectively Russian policy, and for the EU to develop its relations with the other former Soviet republics without Russian opposition, the West has to deal with Russian fears of Western expansion by working out a new security arrangement for Europe. The West might place greater emphasis on engaging Russia constructively on a wide range of world issues. The West should also seek to involve Russia further in the Western network of organizations and agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Nasmyth's Georgia
    PICTURE STORY Peter Nasmyth’s Georgia January 2009 Peter Nasmyth’s Georgia Today's Georgia can only be understood if it is seen in the light of the events of the past two decades. The very difficult transformation the country went through after it declared its independence in 1991, and the conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia which plagued the country since then, still largely shape its present day policies. And nowhere is this better described than in Nasmyth's "Georgia" which is a collection of personal stories of the author and author's friends in Georgia over the years. In his words: I collected stories of people, very specific ones, through which I tell the bigger story of Georgia over time… I never wanted to write about the political forces here, rather the forces that make the politics. This will always give a book a longer life. [Interview with Peter Nasmyth, Tbilisi, October 2008] In the next few pages you will get a guided tour of this excellent book. It is written and it reads like a novel, yet it is full of facts that give a complete account of Georgia's modern day history. The descriptions are so colourful that reading this book is the next best thing to visiting Georgia yourself. What makes the book special is also that the author has updated the book and added new chapters two times after it was first published in 1998. Here we discuss the 2006 edition which covers the modern history of Georgia up to the events of the Rose Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Bendukidze and Russian Capitalism
    Georgia’s Libertarian Revolution Part two: Bendukidze and Russian Capitalism Berlin – Tbilisi – Istanbul 17 April 2010 “Bendukidze’s wealth, as compared to the assets of Russian billionaires, was relatively modest, with most estimates placing it in the range of 50 to 70 million USD in 2004. In a recent interview, he jokingly called himself a “mini-oligarch” at best. However, Kakha Bendukidze was always more than simply an investor and manager. In a 1996 ranking produced by the polling agency Vox Populi, Bendukidze was ranked 33rd among Russia’s top 50 most influential businessmen wielding the biggest influence on government economic policy. A 2004 article in Kommersant credited Bendukidze with being the first to “realise the need to create a lobbying structure that would be able to promote the interests of big business in a civilized way.” Bendukidze cared about politics and he had ideas about the way the Russian economy ought to develop.” (page 8) Table of contents 1. A biologist in Moscow ........................................................................................................ 3 2. How to Become an Oligarch ............................................................................................... 4 3. Big Business and Russian Politics ...................................................................................... 8 4. Vladimir Putin‟s authoritarian liberalism ........................................................................... 9 5. Leaving Russia (2004) ...................................................................................................... 13 Supported by The Think Tank Fund of the Open Society Institute – 3 – 1. A biologist in Moscow Kakha Bendukidze was born in Tbilisi in 1956 into a family of intellectuals. His father Avtandil was professor of mathematics at Tbilisi State University; his mother, Julietta Rukhadze, a historian and ethnographer. Bendukidze would later proudly describe a family with deep entrepreneurial roots: “My grandfather was one of the first factory owners in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Economics of the Restructuring of World Railways, with a Focus on Russia
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS GROUP DISCUSSION PAPER On the Economics of the Restructuring of World Railways, with a Focus on ∗ Russia Russell Pittman † January 2021 EAG 21-1 EAG Discussion Papers are the primary vehicle used to disseminate research from economists in the Economic Analysis Group (EAG) of the Antitrust Division. These papers are intended to inform interested individuals and institutions of EAG’s research program and to stimulate comment and criticism on economic issues related to antitrust policy and regulation. The Antitrust Division encourages independent research by its economists. The views expressed herein are entirely those of the author and are not purported to reflect those of the United States Department of Justice. Information on the EAG research program and discussion paper series may be obtained from Russell Pittman, Director of Economic Research, Economic Analysis Group, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, LSB 9004, Washington, DC 20530, or by e-mail at [email protected]. Comments on specific papers may be addressed directly to the authors at the same mailing address or at their e-mail address. Recent EAG Discussion Paper and EAG Competition Advocacy Paper titles are available from the Social Science Research Network at www.ssrn.com. To obtain a complete list of titles or to request single copies of individual papers, please write to Regina Robinson at [email protected] or call (202) 307 - 5794. In addition, recent papers are now available on the Department of Justice website at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/eag/discussion-papers.html. ∗ The views expressed herein are entirely those of the authors and should not be purported to reflect those of the US Department of Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Prisoners in Post- Revolutionary Georgia
    After the rose, the thorns: political prisoners in post- revolutionary Georgia Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the the right to life, liberty and security of person.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA WATCH No.2, August 2000 Graham T
    RUSSIA WATCH No.2, August 2000 Graham T. Allison, Director Editor: Ben Dunlap Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project Production Director: Melissa C..Carr John F. Kennedy School of Government Researcher: Emily Van Buskirk Harvard University Production Assistant: Emily Goodhue SPOTLIGHT ON RUSSIA’S OLIGARCHS On July 28 Russian President Vladimir Putin met with 21 of Russia’s most influ- ential businessmen to “redefine the relationship between the state and big busi- ness.” At that meeting, Putin assured the tycoons that privatization results would remained unchallenged, but stopped far short of offering a general amnesty for crimes committed in that process. He opened the meeting by saying: “I only want to draw your attention straightaway to the fact that you have yourselves formed this very state, to a large extent through political and quasi-political structures under your control.” Putin assured the oligarchs that recent investi- The Kremlin roundtable comes at a crucial time for the oligarchs. In the last gations were not part of a policy of attacking big business, but said he would not try to restrict two months, many of them have found themselves subjects of investigations prosecutors who launch such cases. by the General Prosecutor’s Office, Tax Police, and Federal Security Serv- ice. After years of cozying up to the government, buying up the state’s most valuable resources in noncompetitive bidding, receiving state-guaranteed loans with little accountability, and flouting the country’s tax laws with imp u- nity, the heads of some of Russia’s leading financial-industrial groups have been thrust under the spotlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Failed Prevention 35
    Table of Contents Foreword by the Editors 5 PART I: CONCEPTS IN CONFLICT PREVENTION 9 Concepts and Instruments in Conflict Prevention 11 Frida Möller PART II: CONFLICT DEVELOPMENT AND FAILED PREVENTION 35 The Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict 37 Sabine Fischer Missed Windows of Opportunity in the Georgian-South Ossetian Conflict – The Political Agenda of the Post-Revolutionary Saakashvili Government (2004-2006) 59 Doris Vogl Failures of the Conflict Transformation and Root Causes of the August War 79 Oksana Antonenko PART III: VIEWS FROM THE REGION 95 Frozen Conflicts: The Missed Opportunities 97 Salomé Zourabichvili Failure to Prevent Violence – Lessons Learnt from the Georgian- Abkhazian Conflict Resolution Process 113 Liana Kvarchelia Missed Chances in the Georgian-South Ossetian Conflict – A View from South Ossetia 131 Alan Parastaev 3 PART IV: THE INTERNATIONAL INFLUENCE 139 OSCE Early Warning and the August Conflict in Georgia 141 Dov Lynch The Role of the United Nations in Abkhazia, Opportunities and Missed Opportunities between 1992 and 2009 151 Charlotte Hille United States’ and NATO’s Role in Georgia’s Territorial Conflicts August 1992-July 2008 169 Eugene Kogan Used & Missed Opportunities for Conflict Prevention in Georgia (1990-2008) – The Role of Russia 187 Markus Bernath Russia and South Ossetia: The Road to Sovereignty 207 Flemming Splidsboel Hansen PART V: CONCLUSIONS 235 Some Lessons Learnt in Conflict Prevention from the Conflicts in the Southern Caucasus 237 Predrag Jurekovi ć List of Authors and Editors 243 4 Foreword by the Editors The violent escalation of the Georgian/South Ossetian and Georgian/Abkhazian conflict in the summer of 2008 resulted in a significant deterioration of the regional security situation in this part of the Southern Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • Colour Protest in Post-War Georgia – Chronology of Rose Revolution
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS DANUBIUS Vol. 11, no. 2/2018 Colour Protest in Post-War Georgia – Chronology of Rose Revolution Nino Machurishvili1 Abstract: The aim of this paper is to review political and material deprivation as a basis for social protest during the pre – revolution period in Georgia, within the framework of Relative Deprivation theory. The linkage between relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient, as well type of existing political regime and Soviet past is considered. The originality of this paper is conditioned by the new approach to Colour Revolutions, forgotten concept of Relative Deprivation is revisited and applied to the Rose Revolution in order to explain, why individuals decided to join demonstrations, as previous studies are considered a precondition for comprehending social protest against rigged elections, either the lack of democracy. This research is based on a qualitative research methodology, the basic methodological approach being the method of the case study. Among with in – depth interviews based on projective techniques with respondents grouped according to their attitudes towards Rose Revolution, quantitative data of World Bank and Freedom House coefficients are also reviewed. Empirical analysis of interviews proves the existence of political and material deprivation between social groups for the research period. This research shows the methodological value of Relative Deprivation to explain social movement motivation for the Rose Revolution in Georgia. Keywords: Colour Revolutions; Relative Deprivation; Social Inequality; Hybrid Regime Introduction 1.1. Relative Deprivation and Individual Decision to Protest This paper contributes to better understanding of causes Colour Revolutions in Post – Soviet space. It specifically deals with the case of Rose Revolution – peaceful change of Government in Georgia in 2003.
    [Show full text]