The Liberal Party Is a House of Many Mansions’, Sir William Harcourt Once Observed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Liberal Party Is a House of Many Mansions’, Sir William Harcourt Once Observed LIBEraliSM AND NaTIONAL IDENTITY THE VicTOriaN AchiEVEMENT ‘The Liberal Party is a house of many mansions’, Sir William Harcourt once observed. At the time it was not altogether a compliment. From the perspective of late-Victorian party management, the sheer variety of Liberalism in social and intellectual terms added considerably to the complications of keeping a parliamentary majority intact during what was notionally a seven-year term. On n its heyday from the 1850s to in integrating the various elements 1914 the Liberal Party enjoyed into the system and giving them the other hand, as the Isignificant support in England, a sense of Britishness that seems Wales, Scotland and Ireland; it increasingly elusive today. foundation for building included High Anglicans, Noncon- This was no small achievement, a coherent and inclusive formists, secular Radicals and Jews; for at the start of the nineteenth it mobilised agricultural labourers century Britain was a society sense of national and aristocratic landowners, trade experiencing great social and unionists and major employers, economic upheaval while being identity Liberalism monarchists and Republicans, dedi- run by a largely closed aristocratic looked a much more cated teetotallers and successful elite comprising just a few hundred brewers. This rainbow coalition not families. As John Vincent observed serviceable vehicle. By only reflected British society in all some years ago, the Liberal Party its inconsistency and exuberance, offered an answer to the question Martin Pugh. it also proved to be instrumental of who was to govern the nation 20 Journal of Liberal History 80 Autumn 2013 LIBEraliSM AND NaTIONAL IDENTITY THE VicTOriaN AchiEVEMENT after the landed aristocracy ceased involved never imprisoning men was a narrow movement too closely to be able to do so by themselves.1 without bringing them to trial, not linked to the Anglican establish- In effect the solution lay in levying taxes without parliamen- ment and the maintenance of privi- gradually curtailing, though not tary approval, and maintaining a lege generally. The 1846 split over overthrowing, aristocratic rule free press and freedom to criticise the repeal of the Corn Laws left the and supplementing it by drawing the highest in the land. Although party more dependent on its rural in talent from outside its ranks and the basis for this system was far and landed interests and reluctant eventually engaging comparatively from democratic – only 2.6 per cent to adjust to industrial-urban Brit- poor and powerless people in the of the population enjoyed a vote ain. After the expansion of the elec- political process. before the 1832 Reform Act – Lib- torate in 1867 and 1885 it retained To this end, nineteenth-century erals believed they had found the very little representation in Wales, Liberals developed what today means of steadily extending popu- and not much more in Scotland would be called a narrative designed lar participation without recourse until the Liberal split over home to explain the nation’s past and to the violence and revolutionary rule in 1886 boosted the party with its present. At the constitutional upheaval experienced by Conti- Liberal Unionist recruits. Above level this drew on the notion of a nental Europe in 1789–1815, in 1830, all, Conservatives were alienated rough-and-ready democracy dat- in 1848, in 1870 and at intervals from the Irish by virtue of their ing back to Anglo-Saxon England in Tsarist Russia. By contrast the links with the Anglo-Irish land- that had been subverted by the British had a genius for step-by- owners and the maintenance of Norman Conquest; in this analy- step reform. Although the ‘Whig’ the Anglican establishment over a sis, parliamentary reform could interpretation of gradual, managed Catholic population. Defence of be seen as patriotic and British. In political change tends to be dispar- The role of the Union with Ireland made the time the British had overthrown aged more than respected today, Conservative appeal more negative the absolutism of the Stuart Kings, it exercised a powerful influence Victorian and divisive than ever. In a reac- replacing it with a parliamentary on British thinking and on British tionary speech in 1886, Lord Salis- monarchy and a balanced system of politicians right up to the time of Liberals in bury deliberately polarised opinion government in which three institu- Clement Attlee. by disparaging the Irish for being tions, King, Lords and Commons, The role of Victorian Liberals in building a as unsuited to self-government as checked each other’s exercise of building a coherent idea of British- the Hottentots; he advised them to power. The Liberal philosopher, ness is the more obvious by com- coherent emigrate to Manitoba, a suggestion John Locke, argued that men placed parison with their Conservative almost as insulting to the Canadi- themselves under society on the rivals. No doubt Conservatism also idea of Brit- ans as it was to the Irish!2 The most basis that the state guaranteed to mobilised a wide range of support the Conservatives achieved was to safeguard their lives and property, when forced to do so by the expan- ishness is win sixteen to seventeen seats in with the clear implication that sion of the electorate. Later in the the more Ulster, in the context of a hundred failure to do so gave them a legiti- century, under Disraeli and Salis- for Ireland as a whole, by exploiting mate reason for rebellion against bury, it promoted its claim as the obvious by the fears of the Protestant minority. authority. patriotic, imperial and monarchist In effect Conservatism became In this way emerged the char- party as a challenge to Liberalism as comparison the English party, as it is today, acteristic liberal belief that liberty the national party; but in the pro- rather than the British party. Con- was integral to Britishness and Brit- cess Conservatism confirmed itself with their servatives even struggled to come ain the most free society on earth, as a much more exclusive force, reli- to terms with provincial England a view widely endorsed by Conti- ant on exploiting fears and antago- Conservative and its leaders, apart from the Glas- nental observers by the nineteenth nisms about external factors. For wegian Andrew Bonar Law, were century. Among other things this much of the century Conservatism rivals. essentially English. Admittedly Journal of Liberal History 80 Autumn 2013 21 liBEraliSM AND NATIONal idENTITY: THE vicTOriaN achiEVEMENT Arthur Balfour had a home in the excluded the church courts from While Con- to the emergence of the Liberal Scottish Borders but his mental the process of divorce in 1857.4 It Party in the mid-Victorian period outlook was entirely dominated by was also responsible for disestab- servatism than his more equivocal views on metropolitan society, London clu- lishing the church in Ireland in 1869 domestic reform, for he was instru- bland and Hertfordshire. Visits to and in Wales in 1920. In 1858 Liber- increasingly mental in popularising a Liberal the provinces left Balfour feeling als helped remove the disability that narrative based on the steady pro- queasy. ‘Public meetings in great excluded Jews as non-Christians took its stand motion of reform and self-deter- towns have attendant horrors in from sitting as MPs. These reforms mination against autocracy and the way of subsidiary luncheons would have attracted condemna- on defence the abuse of power by emperors and dinner’, he complained to Lord tion from the Daily Mail as being and Catholic regimes all over the Salisbury, ‘which are fatal to one’s anti-Christian, politically correct of the Angli- Continent. temper at the moment and to one’s and multicultural, though fortu- can estab- For Liberals this cause went digestion afterwards.’3 He was not nately it did not come unto exist- hand in hand with the other key altogether sorry to be defeated at ence until the end of the century. lishment, vehicle of progress: the implemen- Manchester East in 1906! Even so, reforms of this kind were tation and extension of free trade. Today, with British national not achieved without some politi- Liberalism The rationale was both material identity unravelling fast, the cal cost, though they gradually had and moral. Free trade raised the liv- apparently secure Britishness of the effect of fostering the inclusive managed ing standards of the growing urban Victorian society seems remark- society of the pre-1914 era. population, kept down the costs able, rooted as it was in pride in Rather less complicated, though to be more of the manufacturers and boosted economic success, parliamentary even more efficacious, was the both direct exports and indirect government, imperial expan- association of Victorian Liberal- inclusive. earnings from investment, ship- sion and popular monarchism, not ism with the British success story ping and insurance. Free trade least because Britain comprised in the shape of Britain’s role as a This was created the confidence that an ever- four distinct nationalities and suf- pre-eminent manufacturing and expanding industry would eventu- fered from divisions of all kinds. commercial power. Mid-Victorian symbol- ally create work for everyone who Religion, for example, gener- Liberals were imbued with an opti- was capable and thereby eliminate ated political controversy right mistic belief in the inevitability of ised by W. E. poverty from British society. But up to 1914. But while Conserva- progress that distinguishes their Liberals also invested free trade tism increasingly took its stand on society from ours. The mood was Gladstone, with moral implications in that by defence of the Anglican establish- typically expressed by the histo- drawing other countries into a sys- ment, Liberalism managed to be rian, H. T. Buckle, in his History who was tem of economic cooperation and more inclusive.
Recommended publications
  • HEBEELE, Gerald Clarence, 1932- the PREDICAMENT of the BRITISH UNIONIST PARTY, 1906-1914
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 68-3000 HEBEELE, Gerald Clarence, 1932- THE PREDICAMENT OF THE BRITISH UNIONIST PARTY, 1906-1914. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1967 History, modem University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan © Copyright by Gerald Clarence Heberle 1968 THE PREDICAMENT OF THE BRITISH UNIONIST PARTY, 1906-1914 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gerald c / Heberle, B.A., M.A, ******* The Ohio State University 1967 Approved by B k f y f ’ P c M k ^ . f Adviser Department of History ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my deepest gratitude to Professor Philip P. Poirier of the Department of History, The Ohio State University, Dr. Poirier*s invaluable advice, his unfailing patience, and his timely encouragement were of immense assistance to me in the production of this dissertation, I must acknowledge the splendid service of the staff of the British Museum Manuscripts Room, The Librarian and staff of the University of Birmingham Library made the Chamberlain Papers available to me and were most friendly and helpful. His Lordship, Viscount Chilston, and Dr, Felix Hull, Kent County Archivist, very kindly permitted me to see the Chilston Papers, I received permission to see the Asquith Papers from Mr, Mark Bonham Carter, and the Papers were made available to me by the staff of the Bodleian Library, Oxford University, To all of these people I am indebted, I am especially grateful to Mr, Geoffrey D,M, Block and to Miss Anne Allason of the Conservative Research Department Library, Their cooperation made possible my work in the Conservative Party's publications, and their extreme kindness made it most enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberals and Ireland 1912–16 Liberal Ministers Had to Deal with More Than the Great War During the Period 1914–18
    The Liberals and Ireland 1912–16 Liberal ministers had to deal with more than the Great War during the period 1914–18. Dr Jeremy Smith examines the Liberal record on the Irish Question during this critical period. On Friday February a lb bomb exploded in Canary effort and requested a unified Irish Brigade, as had been granted Wharf, ending an eighteen-month IRA ceasefire. Writing three to the Ulstermen; both were repudiated. This pointless effrontery days later the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, declared that the to Redmond was compounded during the Cabinet reshuffle of resumption of violence was the ‘total responsibility’ of the British , when Sir Edward Carson was made Attorney-General. Yet government who ‘had been guilty of criminal neglect’ (The more disastrously, the Home Rule Bill that the Nationalists had Guardian, February , p.). At one level these were simply won constitutionally for Ireland was suspended for the duration the words of a politician apportioning blame. Yet they carried a of the war, a postponement that allowed physical force elements deeper resonance. For by linking physical force Republicanism in Ireland to gain influence and eventually seize the initiative firmly to British procrastination, Adams was positioning himself from the constitutional parties. By failing to provide any obvious inside a long-established tradition of Irish Nationalist legitimation recompense for the Nationalist party’s loyalty to the British war (the acknowledged corollaries to this legitimation being that a effort, government prevarication provided a golden opportunity British government would only take notice of violence, and when for more extreme Nationalists and Republicans, which they took it did take notice it was inclined to over-react).
    [Show full text]
  • 30/Spring 2001
    Peelites Tony Little examines the part played by the renegade Conservatives – the Peelites – in the creation of the Liberal Party. ‘‘HisHis FriendsFriends SatSat onon thethe BenchesBenches Opposite’Opposite’ In the Journal’s special issue on defectors (Journal of Although Lord Palmerston had been a part of the Liberal Democrat History , winter –), one Aberdeen coalition, his semi-detached position and group significant to the development of the modern pugnacious character made him the inevitable war Liberal Party was omitted – the Peelites. Here, by leader and he was the prime beneficiary of the pe- way of a review of Professor Angus Hawkins’ book, tering out of the war shortly after he had acceded to Parliament, Party and the Art of Politics in Britain, – the premiership. However, Palmerston had only (Macmillan, ), I aim to show the part played been able to form his government by treading on by these renegade Conservatives in the creation of the toes of oversensitive Peelites such as Gladstone, the modern Liberal Party. and without resolving a long-running quarrel with The formation of the Liberal Party is often dated Lord John Russell. to the meeting in Willis’s Rooms on June . It is at this point that Hawkins takes up the story. This meeting brought together Whigs, Liberals, The problem he poses is that, while, in Kitson’s Radicals and Peelites to defeat Lord Derby. It ush- words, it is not ‘very easy to say what specific opin- ered in a Liberal government under Lord ions were uniquely organised in the middle of the Palmerston which served until Palmerston’s death in century by the Conservative Party’, the forces that and paved the way for Gladstone’s great re- came together to oppose Derby suffered from a su- forming government of –.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberals in Coalition
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 72 / Autumn 2011 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals in coalition Vernon Bogdanor Riding the tiger The Liberal experience of coalition government Ian Cawood A ‘distinction without a difference’? Liberal Unionists and Conservatives Kenneth O. Morgan Liberals in coalition, 1916–1922 David Dutton Liberalism and the National Government, 1931–1940 Matt Cole ‘Be careful what you wish for’ Lessons of the Lib–Lab Pact Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 72 Autumn 2011 new book from tHe History Group for details, see back page Journal of Liberal History issue 72: Autumn 2011 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Riding the tiger: the Liberal experience of 4 Editor: Duncan Brack coalition government Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Vernon Bogdanor introduces this special issue of the Journal Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Coalition before 1886 10 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, York Membery Whigs, Peelites and Liberals: Angus Hawkins examines coalitions before 1886 Patrons A ‘distinction without a difference’? 14 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Ian Cawood analyses how the Liberal Unionists maintained a distinctive Professor John Vincent identity from their Conservative allies, until coalition in 1895 Editorial Board The coalition of 1915–1916 26 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Prelude to disaster: Ian Packer examines the Asquith coalition of 1915–16, Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard which brought to an end the last solely Liberal government Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine Birrell, Chief Secretary for Ireland, 1907-1916
    3.0 Those who Set the Stage 3.1 Those concerned with Home Rule (for and against) 3.1.2 Augustine Birrell, Chief Secretary for Ireland, 1907-1916 Birrell contributed indirectly to the Rising by failing (together with Asquith) to confront the Ulster unionists and by failing to take action against the republicans planning the Rising. Augustine Birrell (1850-1933) was from Liverpool. His father was a Baptist minister and his maternal grandfather a Free Church of Scotland minister; in later life he became an agnostic, but maintained a Liberal nonconformist outlook. A legacy enabled him to study law at Trinity Hall, Cambridge, following which he practiced as a barrister and gained recognition as an essayist and literary critic of distinction. Elected as the Liberal MP for West Fife in 1889, he served as a minister under Campbell-Bannerman, becoming Chief Secretary for Ireland in 1907, an office which he held until May 1916 when he resigned under a cloud in the aftermath of the Rising. The Chief Secretary was the official responsible for formulating and administering government policy in Ireland. Birrell was one of the most humane, committed and productive ministers ever to hold the office. He was well disposed towards nationalist Ireland, his ultimate objective being Home Rule. In the meantime, he had a total of fifty-six pieces of largely beneficial legislation enacted. These included acts for the establishment of the National University of Ireland and Queen’s University Belfast, and the 1909 Land Act, which accelerated the purchase of land by tenants and reduced agrarian strife.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zoab Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 46106 7619623
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) dr section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages, This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Report
    Breakthrough Britain A Force to be Reckoned With A Policy Report by the Policing Reform Working Group Chaired by Ray Mallon March 2009 About the Centre for Social Justice The Centre for Social Justice aims to put social justice at the heart of British politics. Our policy development is rooted in the wisdom of those working to tackle Britain’s deepest social problems and the experience of those whose lives have been affected by poverty. Our working groups are non-partisan, comprising prominent academics, practitioners and policy makers who have expertise in the relevant fields. We consult nationally and internationally, especially with charities and social enterprises, who are the the champions of the welfare society. In addition to policy development, the CSJ has built an alliance of poverty fighting organisations that reverse social breakdown and transform communities. We believe that the surest way the Government can reverse social breakdown and poverty is to enable such individuals, communities and voluntary groups to help themselves. The CSJ was founded by Iain Duncan Smith in 2004, as the fulfilment of a promise made to Janice Dobbie, whose son had recently died from a drug overdose just after he was released from prison. Chairman: Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith MP Executive Director: Philippa Stroud Breakthrough Britain: A Force to be Reckoned With © The Centre for Social Justice, 2009 Published by the Centre for Social Justice, 9 Westminster Palace Gardens, Artillery Row, SW1P 1RL www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk ISBN: 978-0-9556999-9-3 Designed by SoapBox, www.soapboxcommunications.co.uk This report represents the views of the working group as a whole and does not reflect at every point the individual opinion of each and every working group member.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Journal of Sir George Fottrell
    THE POLITICAL JOURNAL OF SIR GEORGE FOTTRELL 13 Jany. 1885 I think it may perhaps at some future stage of Irish politics prove useful to have from an eye witness some notes of the events now passing in Ireland or rather some notes of the inner working of the Government and of the Irish party.I have rather exceptional opportunities of noting their working. I have since I attained manhood been a consistent Nationalist and I believe that the leading men on the national side have confidence in my honour and consistency. On the other hand I am a Crown official & I am an intimate personal friend of Sir Robert Hamilton,1 the Under Secretary for Ireland. My first introduction to him took place about 18 months ago. I was introduced to him by Robert Holmes,2 the Treasury Remembrancer. At that time Sir Robert was Mr.Hamilton & his private secretary was Mr.Clarke Hall who had come over temporarily from the Admiralty. Mr. Hamilton was himself at that time only a temporary official. Shortly afterwards he was induced to accept the permanent appointment as Under Secretary. From the date of my first introduction to him up to the present our acquaintance has steadily developed into a warm friendship and I think that Sir Robert Hamilton now probably speaks to me on Irish matters more freely than to anyone else. I have always spoken to him with similar freedom and whether my views were shared by him or were at total variance with his I have never concealed my opinion from him.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XXIV-2 | 2019 Ulster Exclusion and Irish Nationalism: Consenting to the Principle of Partit
    Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXIV-2 | 2019 La Question du Home Rule 1870-1914 Ulster Exclusion and Irish Nationalism: Consenting to the Principle of Partition, 1912-1916 L’Exclusion de l’Ulster et le nationalisme irlandais : consentir au principe de la partition, 1912-1916 Conor Mulvagh Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/3773 DOI: 10.4000/rfcb.3773 ISSN: 2429-4373 Publisher CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Electronic reference Conor Mulvagh, « Ulster Exclusion and Irish Nationalism: Consenting to the Principle of Partition, 1912-1916 », Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique [Online], XXIV-2 | 2019, Online since 19 June 2019, connection on 09 July 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/3773 ; DOI : 10.4000/ rfcb.3773 This text was automatically generated on 9 July 2019. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Ulster Exclusion and Irish Nationalism: Consenting to the Principle of Partit... 1 Ulster Exclusion and Irish Nationalism: Consenting to the Principle of Partition, 1912-1916 L’Exclusion de l’Ulster et le nationalisme irlandais : consentir au principe de la partition, 1912-1916 Conor Mulvagh Introduction1 1 In settling the so-called “Irish question” between 1912 and 1922, two outcomes which could not have been foreseen at the outset were that six of Ireland’s thirty-two counties would be excluded from the jurisdiction of a Dublin parliament and that a majority of Irish nationalists from those counties would consent to time-limited exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Building of the State the Buildingucd and the Royal College of Scienceof on Merrionthe Street
    The Building of the State The BuildingUCD and the Royal College of Scienceof on Merrionthe Street. State UCD and the Royal College of Science on Merrion Street. The Building of the State Science and Engineering with Government on Merrion Street www.ucd.ie/merrionstreet Introduction Although the Government Buildings complex on Merrion Street is one of most important and most widely recognised buildings in Ireland, relatively few are aware of its role in the history of science and technology in the country. At the start of 2011, in preparation for the centenary of the opening of the building, UCD initiated a project seeking to research and record that role. As the work progressed, it became apparent that the story of science and engineering in the building from 1911 to 1989 mirrored in many ways the story of the country over that time, reflecting and supporting national priorities through world wars, the creation of an independent state and the development of a technology sector known and respected throughout the world. All those who worked or studied in the Royal College of Science for Ireland or UCD in Merrion Street – faculty and administrators, students and porters, technicians and librarians – played a part in this story. All those interviewed as part of this project recalled their days in the building with affection and pride. As chair of the committee that oversaw this project, and as a former Merrion Street student, I am delighted to present this publication as a record of UCD’s association with this great building. Professor Orla Feely University College Dublin Published by University College Dublin, 2011.
    [Show full text]