Jewish Women in Nazi Germany: Daily Life, Daily Struggles, 1933-1939 Author(S): Marion A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jewish Women in Nazi Germany: Daily Life, Daily Struggles, 1933-1939 Author(S): Marion A Jewish Women in Nazi Germany: Daily Life, Daily Struggles, 1933-1939 Author(s): Marion A. Kaplan Source: Feminist Studies, Vol. 16, No. 3 (Autumn, 1990), pp. 579-606 Published by: Feminist Studies, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3178020 . Accessed: 05/08/2014 00:42 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Feminist Studies, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Feminist Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 167.206.19.4 on Tue, 5 Aug 2014 00:42:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions JEWISH WOMEN IN NAZI GERMANY: DAILY LIFE, DAILY STRUGGLES, 1933-1939 MARION A. KAPLAN "We were so German," "we were so assimilated," "we were so middle-class"- these are the refrains one reads over and over in the memoirs of German Jews who try to explain to us (and to themselves) what their lives were like before Nazi barbarism over- powered them. They stress how normal their lives were, how bourgeois their habits and attitudes. German Jews-a predomi- nantly middle-class group comprising less than 1 percent of the German population-had welcomed their legal emancipation in the second half of the nineteenth century and lived in a relatively comfortable, secure environment until 1933. Between 1933 and 1939, however, they saw their economic livelihoods imperiled and their social integration destroyed. Inexorably, they were engulfed in the maelstrom that led to the Holocaust: impoverishment and ostracism for most; emigration for many; hiding for a handful; and ghettoization, forced labor, and extermination for the rest.' The calamity that hit German Jews affected them as Jews first. But Jewish women had gender-specific experiences as well. In ad- dition to suffering the persecution that afflicted all Jews, Jewish women also had the burden of keeping their households and com- munities together. Racism and persecution as well as survival meant something different for women than men - in practical and psychological terms. This essay explores the increasingly difficult daily lives of Jewish middle-class women and the work of their main organiza- tion, the League of Jewish Women, JuedischerFrauenbund (JFB), in prewar Nazi Germany. By focusing on the 1930s, we can locate the intensification of persecution and its effects on women and their families in a time when few dreamed that developments would end in anything like Auschwitz. In fact, this period is often FeministStudies 16, no. 3 (Fall 1990).? 1990 by FeministStudies, Inc. 579 This content downloaded from 167.206.19.4 on Tue, 5 Aug 2014 00:42:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 580 MarionA. Kaplan neglected for either the earlier, more hopeful era of the Weimar Republic (1918-33) or the later shocking years of genocide. But the intermediate era-the nazification of daily life, when the victims had to learn to cope, and when even relationships among ordinary Germans were coarsened - is often far more instructive politically. Moreover, exploring the lives of Jews as they interacted daily with Gentiles challenges the myth of political innocence with which so many Germans today surround their accounts of "dailylife in Nazi Germany."2Most importantly for our purpose, gender differences in the experience of being a persecuted Jew can be illustrated more clearly for these years than for later ones. Finally, a brief look at Jewish women's organizations shows how women responded col- lectively to increasing persecution. The focus will be on housewives and mothers, largely because they are the ones who left the most memoirs. Still, they also made up a large portion of the female community. In their twenties, thirties, and forties, these women had embarked upon marriage, created families, and, sometimes, started careers. Like the vast majority of Jews, they experienced the impending catastrophe from their situation as ethnically or religiously Jewish and politi- cally liberal citizens, increasingly shocked by the abrogation of the rights and liberties they once had taken for granted. Other Jewish women will receive less attention here: rarely did those who inter- married, who remained in Germany after the war broke out, or who died leave memoirs behind, at least ones that are accessible today. Of those who managed to escape, single women and the elderly are underrepresented in memoir collections.3 Finally, memoir collections are often found in Jewish libraries and ar- chives. Hence, writers who were more self-conciously Jewish might have deposited them, possibly creating a sample of Jews who were slightly less integrated into German society than the ac- tual range of women's situations.4 OVERVIEW OF JEWISH WOMEN AND THEIR COMMUNITY In 1933, 500,000 people were registered as Jews in Germany (ex- cluding those who had offically left Judaism), or about 0.77 per- cent of the population. Seventy percent lived in large cities with populations of over 100,000 (one-half of non-Jews lived in places This content downloaded from 167.206.19.4 on Tue, 5 Aug 2014 00:42:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Marion A. Kaplan 581 with under 10,000 inhabitants), and one-third (over 160,000) lived in Berlin, where they made up close to 4 percent of the population. Like every minority, the Jewish minority had a career profile that differed significantly from that of the general population. Histori- cally prohibited from a variety of economic endeavors, almost 62 percent of Jews (compared with 18 percent of non-Jews) worked in business and commerce. They were underrepresented in agri- cultural careers, where less than 2 percent of Jews (but 29 percent of other Germans) were employed. The employment of Jewish women had gradually increased to 27 percent by 1933, but it was still less than that of non-Jewish women (34 percent). Of those who worked, over one-third were salaried employees; about one- fifth were assistants in family enterprises (mithelfendeFamilienan- gehoerige). Another one-fifth were self-employed (this could in- clude a large business or a tiny one), and about one-tenth were workers (mostly in industry, but often in the offices rather than on the factory floor).5 The socioeconomic position of Jews was overwhelmingly middle class, although the inflation of the early 1920s and the Great De- pression had definitely set them back. More women had to assist or support their families-a trend that intensified in the Nazi period - and more Jews had to rely on financial aid from Jewish welfare organizations.6In addition, almost one in five Jews in Ger- many was a refugee from Eastern Europe. Most of these Ostjuden, as they were called, eked out humble existences as industrial workers, minor artisans, or peddlers. In comparison with non-Jewish women, Jewish women general- ly had smaller families and more education. They were less likely to work outside the home and more likely to have household help. Although married Jewish women devoted themselves to their fami- lies, parents expected their unmarried daughters to prepare for a career. Many - seven times as many proportionally as Christian women -went to the university.7 As we shall see, after 1933, career development was increasingly obstructed just as wage earning became more urgent. During the Weimar Republic, strictly religious education and practices were on the decline and mixed marriages on the rise.8 In the large cities, marriage to Christians was becoming so common- especially among Jewish men - that some Jewish leaders actually feared the complete fusion of their community into German socie- This content downloaded from 167.206.19.4 on Tue, 5 Aug 2014 00:42:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 582 Marion A. Kaplan ty by the end of the twentieth century.9 Jews eagerly joined non- sectarian organizations. For example, the Jewish feminist move- ment (League of Jewish Women) belonged to the German bour- geois feminist movement from 1908 until 1933, and individual Jewish women were prominent members of other German wom- en's organizations. Jews felt a deep allegiance to the ideals of Ger- man civilization as they understood them-the Enlightenment values of tolerance, humanism, and reason. They enjoyed general acceptance in the worlds of art and culture, participated in center and moderate Left politics, and excelled in the "free"professions of medicine and law. Possibly as many as one-third of all women physicians in the Weimar Republic were Jewish.'o Although Jews adapted to the social, political, or cultural styles of their surroundings, "quoting Goethe at every meal,""'they also preserved a sense of ethnic solidarity and religious cohesion. They did so through organizing religious or secular Jewish groups and through maintaining traditional family holiday celebrations. Women's organizations, in particular, fostered a sense of Jewish identity- including religious identity- throughout the Weimar years. Thus, as we shall see, the interest by women's organizations in their Jewish heritage during the Nazi period was not a sudden shift; it was an intensification of a trend already well under way. Finally, a small Zionist movement, while failing to make signifi- cant inroads into the assimilationist commitments of most Ger- man Jews, sharpened Jewish self-consciousness.12 Jewish cohesion was also a response to a pervasive anti- Semitism with roots in Imperial Germany (1871-1918).
Recommended publications
  • The German-Jewish Experience Revisited Perspectives on Jewish Texts and Contexts
    The German-Jewish Experience Revisited Perspectives on Jewish Texts and Contexts Edited by Vivian Liska Editorial Board Robert Alter, Steven E. Aschheim, Richard I. Cohen, Mark H. Gelber, Moshe Halbertal, Geoffrey Hartman, Moshe Idel, Samuel Moyn, Ada Rapoport-Albert, Alvin Rosenfeld, David Ruderman, Bernd Witte Volume 3 The German-Jewish Experience Revisited Edited by Steven E. Aschheim Vivian Liska In cooperation with the Leo Baeck Institute Jerusalem In cooperation with the Leo Baeck Institute Jerusalem. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-037293-9 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-036719-5 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-039332-3 ISSN 2199-6962 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Cover image: bpk / Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin Typesetting: PTP-Berlin, Protago-TEX-Production GmbH, Berlin Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Preface The essays in this volume derive partially from the Robert Liberles International Summer Research Workshop of the Leo Baeck Institute Jerusalem, 11–25 July 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Germany in the 1920S
    3. Germany in the 1920s The shadowy figures that look out at us from the tarnished mirror of history are – in the final analysis – ourselves. DETLEV J. K. PEUKERT OVERVIEW Few events in history are inevitable. Most are determined by real people making real decisions. At the time, those choices may not seem important. Yet together, little by little, they shape a period in history and define an age. Those decisions also have consequences that may affect generations to come. Chapter 2 looked at the way three nations – the United States, France, and Germany – decided who belonged in the nineteenth century and who did not. It also considered the outcomes of those choices. This chapter marks the beginning of a case study that examines the choices people made after World War I. It highlights Germany’s efforts to build a democracy after the humiliation of defeat and explores the values, myths, and fears that threatened those efforts. It focuses in particular on the choices that led to the destruction of the republic and the rise of the Nazis. The 1920s were a time of change everywhere in the world. Many of those changes began much earlier and were speeded up by the war. Others were linked to innovations in science that altered the way people saw the world. In 1905, Albert Einstein, a German physicist, published his theory of relativity. By 1920, other scientists had proved that time and space are indeed relative and not absolute. The theory quickly became a part of the way ordinary people viewed the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Everyday Antisemitism in Pre-War Nazi Germany: the Popular Bases by Michael H
    Everyday Antisemitism in Pre-War Nazi Germany: The Popular Bases By Michael H. Kater The thesis that manifestations of "Antisemitism" in the Third Reich were largely a result of manipulations by Nazi politicians rather than the reflection of true sentiments among the German people appears firmly established nowadays. This thesis treats the course of German history as being devoid of a specific antisemitic tradition and regards what authentic symptoms of Antisemitism there were, before and during Hitler's rise to power, as merely incidental.1 One might well agree with Hajo Holborn's suggestion that Hitler, the supreme propagandist of his Nazi Party (NSDAP) and of the Third Reich, conjured up Antisemitism by arousing hatred within the Germans, in order to further the regime's ultimate goals. But then one cannot, like Eva Reichmann, altogether discount pre-existing notions of Judeo-phobia among the German people and, by implication, absolve them of their complicity in the Holocaust.2 Since the appearance of Reichmann's and Holborn's writings, 1 The first view has been succinctly stated by Thomas Nipperdey, “1933 und Kontinuitaet der deutschen Geschichte,” Historische Zeitschrift 227, 1978: 98. An example of the second view is in William Sheridan Allen, The Nazi Seizure of Power: The Experience of a Single German Town 1930–1935 , Chicago, 1965, p. 77, who writes that the inhabitants of the small North German town of Northeim (“Thalburg”) were drawn to anti-Semitism because they were drawn to Nazism, not the other way around ' . 2 Hajo Holborn, “Origins and Political Character of Nazi Ideology,” Political Science Quarterly 79, 1964: 546; Eva G.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. the Nazis Take Power
    4. The Nazis Take Power Anyone who interprets National Socialism as merely a political movement knows almost nothing about it. It is more than a religion. It is the determination to create the new man. ADOLF HITLER OVERVIEW Within weeks of taking office, Adolf Hitler was altering German life. Within a year, Joseph Goebbels, one of his top aides, could boast: The revolution that we have made is a total revolution. It encompasses every aspect of public life from the bottom up… We have replaced individuality with collective racial consciousness and the individual with the community… We must develop the organizations in which every individual’s entire life will be regulated by the Volk community, as represented by the Party. There is no longer arbitrary will. There are no longer any free realms in which the individual belongs to himself… The time of personal happiness is over.1 How did Hitler do it? How did he destroy the Weimar Republic and replace it with a totalitarian government – one that controls every part of a person’s life? Many people have pointed out that he did not destroy democracy all at once. Instead, he moved gradually, with one seemingly small compromise leading to another and yet another. By the time many were aware of the danger, they were isolated and alone. This chapter details those steps. It also explores why few Germans protested the loss of their freedom and many even applauded the changes the Nazis brought to the nation. Historian Fritz Stern offers one answer. “The great appeal of National Socialism – and perhaps of every totalitarian dictatorship in this century – was the promise of absolute authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Students with Disabilities
    CARLETON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF THE HUMANITIES RELIGION PROGRAM: RELI 3842B, FALL 2009 Topics in Judaism: GERMAN-JEWISH ENCOUNTERS WITH MODERNITY: FROM THE ENLIGHTENMENT TO THE PRESENT Mon. and Wed., 1:05-2:25 pm, Room B146 LA Instructor: Prof. James Casteel Office: 2A60 Paterson Hall Office Hours: Mondays and Wednesdays 3:00-4:00 pm Tel.: 613-520-2600, ext. 1934 Email: [email protected] (this is the most effective way to reach me) COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course will explore the remarkable transformations of Jewish society, culture and religious practice in German lands from the Enlightenment to the present. In the first half of the course we will trace the prolonged process of Jews’ social and political emancipation and acculturation into non-Jewish society over the course of the long nineteenth-century. We will pay particular attention to the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion, examining the ways in which they influenced Jews’ negotiations of their identities as both Germans and Jews and also the extent to which they contributed to the vibrancy of Jewish German cultural and intellectual life. In the second half of the course we will turn to the impact of World War I on Jewish Germans and discuss the novel opportunities that opened up to Jews in the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government. In particular, we will be concerned with the question of why at the moment when Jews reached the height of their social and political inclusion in German society did social movements emerge that vehemently challenged Jews’ belonging to the German “national community.” We will discuss the ramifications to Jewish social and cultural life of the Nazis coming to power and Jewish responses to Nazi persecution during the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Everyday Antisemitism in Pre-War Nazi Germany: the Popular Bases
    Everyday Antisemitism in Pre-war Nazi Germany: the Popular Bases The thesis that manifestations of "antisemitism" in the Third Reich were largely a result of manipulations by Nazi politicians rather than the reflection of true sentiments among the German people appears firmly established nowadays. This thesis treats the course of German history as being devoid of a specific antisemitic tradition and regards what authentic symptoms of antisemitism there were, before and during Hitler's rise to power, as merely incidental 1 . One might well agree with Hajo Holborn's suggestion that Hitler, the supreme propagandist of his Nazi Party (NSDAP) and of the Third Reich, conjured up antisemitism by arousing hatred within the Germans, in order to further the regime's ultimate goals. But then one cannot, like Eva Reichmann, altogether discount pre-existing notions of Judeophobia among the German people and, by implication, absolve them of their complicity in the Holocaust 2 . Since the appearance of Reichmann's and Holborn's writings, certain younger scholars, while indubitably presenting cogent arguments, have overemphasized the degree of high-level Nazi management of anti-Jewish action. Conversely, they have downplayed the spontaneity of such action and its general popularity with the German public. In so doing, however, they have come close to mis-comprehending the social basis of antisemitism in the Third Reich and to ignoring its important historical antecedents 3 . 1 The first view has been succinctly stated by Thomas Nipperdey, “1933 und Kontinuitaet der deutschen Geschichte,” Historische Zeitschrift 227, 1978: 98. An example of the second view is in William Sheridan Allen, The Nazi Seizure of Power: The Experience of a Single German Town 1930–1935 , Chicago, 1965, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Socialist Revolution That Swept Through Germany in 1933, and It Examines the Choices Individual Germans Were Forced to Confront As a Result
    Chapter 5 The National The Scope and Sequence Socialist Individual Choosing to & Society Participate Revolution We & They Judgment, Memory & Legacy The Holocaust Hulton Archive / Stringer / Gey Images / Gey / Stringer Archive Hulton HaHB_chapter5_v1_PPS.indd 220 3/7/17 4:34 PM Overview On January 30, 1933, President Paul von Hindenburg named Adolf Hitler chancellor of Germany. Within days of Hitler’s appointment, the Nazis began to target their political opposition and those they considered enemies of the state, especially Communists and Jews. Within months, they had transformed Germany into a dictatorship. This chapter chronicles the National Socialist revolution that swept through Germany in 1933, and it examines the choices individual Germans were forced to confront as a result. HaHB_chapter5_v1_PPS.indd 221 3/7/17 4:34 PM Chapter 5 Introduction Hitler’s appointment as chancellor on January 30, 1933, thrilled some Ger- Essential mans and horrified others. Writing in 1939, journalist Sebastian Haffner said Questions that when he read the news that afternoon, his reaction was “icy horror”: • What made it possible for Certainly this had been a possibility for a long time. You had to reckon with it. the Nazis to transform Nevertheless it was so bizarre, so incredible, to read it now in black and white. Germany into a dicta- Hitler Reich Chancellor . for a moment I physically sensed the man’s odor of torship during their first blood and filth, the nauseating approach of a man-eating animal—its foul, sharp years in power? claws in my face. • What choices do individ- Then I shook the sensation off, tried to smile, started to consider, and found many uals have in the face of reasons for reassurance.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTRUCTING MODERN IDENTITIES Jewish University Students in Germany 1 8 1 5 1 9 1 4
    CONSTRUCTING M O D E R N IDENTITIES CONSTRUCTING MODERN IDENTITIES Jewish University Students in Germany 1 8 1 5 1 9 1 4 Keith H. Pickus WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS DETROIT Copyright © 1999 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201. All material in this work, except as identified below, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/. All material not licensed under a Creative Commons li- cense is all rights reserved. Permission must be obtained from the copyright owner to use this material. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pickus, Keith H., 1959– Constructing modern identities : Jewish university students in Germany, 1815–1914 / Keith H. Pickus. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 978-0-8143-4352-4 (paperback); 978-0-8143-4351-7 (ebook) 1. Jewish college students—Germany—History— 19th century. 2. Jews— Germany—History—1800–1933. 3. Jewish college students—Germany— Societies, etc.— History—19th century. 4. Jews—Germany—Identity. 5. ­Germany—Ethnic relations. I. Title. DS135.G33 1999 378.1'982'9924043—DC21 99-11845 Designer: S. R. Tenenbaum The publication of this volume in a freely accessible digital format has been made possible by a major grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Mellon Foundation through their Humanities Open Book Program. Grateful acknowledgment is made to the Koret Foun- dation for financial support in the publication of this volume. Wayne State University Press thanks the following individuals and institutions for their generous permis- sion to reprint material in this book: Paul Fairbrook; The Leo Baeck Institute; and Stanford University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Minds
    SCHENDERLEIN GERMANY ON THEIR MINDS German Jewish Refugees in the United States and Their Relationships with Germany, 1938–1988 GERMANY ANNE C. SCHENDERLEIN ON THEIR is is a solid, comprehensive study of German Jewish refugees in the United States, especially in Los Angeles and New York. It is probing and judicious. Michael A. Meyer, Hebrew Union College – Jewish Institute of Religion MINDS THEIR ON GERMANY roughout the 1930s and early 1940s, approximately ninety thousand German MINDS Jews ed their homeland and settled in the United States, prior to that nation closing its borders to Jewish refugees. And even though many of them wanted little to do with Germany, the circumstances of World War II and the postwar era meant that engagement of some kind was unavoidable—whether direct or indirect, initiated within the community itself or by political actors and the broader German public. is book carefully traces these entangled histories on GERMAN JEWISH REFUGEES both sides of the Atlantic, demonstrating the remarkable extent to which German Jews and their former fellow citizens helped to shape developments from the IN THE UNITED STATES AND THEIR Allied war e ort to the course of West German democratization. RELATIONSHIPS WITH GERMANY, 19381988 Anne C. Schenderlein is the managing director of the Dahlem Humanities Cen- ter at Freie Universität Berlin. After receiving her doctorate in modern European history at the University of California, San Diego, she was a research fellow at the German Historical Institute from 2015 to 2019. Her research has been sup- ported by numerous fellowships, including the Leo Baeck Fellowship and, more recently, a grant from the American Jewish Archives, where she conducted research on American Jewish boycotts and consumption of German products.
    [Show full text]
  • READING 4 Targeting the Jews
    might you trust? What policies might you support? Oppose? Be sure to include your feelings as well as your stand on the issues. Are you scared? Uncertain? Confident? Record your comments in your journal. READING 4 Targeting the Jews To bring about his revolution, Hitler had to isolate and then eliminate his opponents. Once the Communists were outside the protection of the law, he turned his attention to the Jews. He ordered Nazi leaders to “bring up the Jewish question again and again and again, unceasingly. Every emotional aversion, however slight, must be exploited ruthlessly. As a basic rule among the education professions the Jewish questions should be discussed from the To me the whole thing standpoints of the findings of the science of race, of higher was inconceivable. It ethics, etc. While among members of the labouring classes would not sink in that one must seize on the purely emotional; the emotional something like that could aversion to Jews is to be heightened by all possible means.” even be possible in the twentieth century, for such As part of its campaign, the government announced a things had happened, at one-day boycott of Jewish businesses. On Saturday, April 1, most, in the Middle Ages. Germans were to refuse to shop or do business at any And yet it was the bitter company owned by Jews. Julius Streicher, the man in charge truth that outside, in front of the boycott and the publisher of the antisemitic Der of the door, there stood Stuermer, created the lie that would be repeated constantly, two boys in brown shirts, just as Hitler instructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Heyl ENGLISH FINAL1
    Workshop 2: Teaching and Learning about Perpetrators within Memorial Sites Matthias Heyl, Memorial Museum, Ravensbrück Dealing with the perpetrators in the educational programmes of the Ravensbrück Memorial Site against the background of German landscapes of memory In the German discourse on commemoration, places with a historical connection to the crimes of the Nazis are divided into those associated with perpetrators and those associated with victims. That distinction cannot be strictly maintained in those historical sites that are now concentration camp memorials. To commemorate the victims without reference to the perpetrators would be to de-historicise and de-contextualise the crimes of the Nazis, as if those crimes had been committed "without a perpetrator".1 Yitzchak Mais has described the various perspectives on the Shoah adopted in Germany, Israel and the United States and how they tend to be reflected in historical exhibitions: "The events of the Holocaust are usually divided into three dimensions, as per the historical characters: (1) perpetrators; (2) victims; (3) bystanders. The last category refers to the countries not under Nazi domination and also to the non-Jewish citizens of the Nazi-occupied nations. […] The determining factor is […] the degree of symmetry and proportion given to each of the historical components when the composite story line of the Holocaust is presented either in a school curriculum or in a museum exhibition. The dimension emphasized is primarily a function of where and for whom the exhibition is displayed - the ‚local‘ interests of the visitors and the messages one wants to impart to the museums’ visitors." 2 Mais says different emphases in accounts of what happened prevail in Germany, in the Jewish context, and in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Carleton University Fall Term 2013 College of the Humanities Religion Program RELI 3141A Jewish Life in Modern Germany Mons., 11:35 Am -2:25 Pm; River Building 3110
    Carleton University Fall Term 2013 College of the Humanities Religion Program RELI 3141A Jewish Life in Modern Germany Mons., 11:35 am -2:25 pm; River Building 3110 Prof. James Casteel Office: River Building 3306 Office Hours: Mondays 2:30-4:00 pm or by appointment. Tel.: 613-520-2600, ext. 1934 Email: [email protected] (this is the most effective way to reach me) COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course will explore the remarkable transformations of Jewish society, culture and religious practice in German lands from the Enlightenment to the present. In the first half of the course we will trace the prolonged process of Jews’ social and political emancipation and acculturation into non-Jewish society over the course of the long nineteenth-century. We will pay particular attention to the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion, examining the ways in which they influenced Jews’ negotiations of their identities as both Germans and Jews and also the extent to which they contributed to the vibrancy of Jewish German cultural and intellectual life. In the second half of the course we will turn to the impact of World War I on Jewish Germans and discuss the novel opportunities that opened up to Jews in the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government. In particular, we will be concerned with the question of why at the moment when Jews reached the height of their social and political inclusion in German society did social movements emerge that vehemently challenged Jews’ belonging to the German “national community.” We will discuss the ramifications to Jewish social and cultural life of the Nazis coming to power and Jewish responses to Nazi persecution during the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]