DOCSLIB.ORG

Factors Involved in the Success and Establishment of the Field

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Factors Involved in the Success and Establishment of the Field FACTORS INVOLVED IN THE SUCCESS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FIELD BINDWEED GALL MITE ACERIA MALHERBAE NUZZACI (ACARI: ERIOPHYIDAE) by Evelyn Rivka Konigsberg A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Land Resources and Environmental Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana January 2014 ©COPYRIGHT by Evelyn Rivka Konigsberg 2014 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Evelyn Rivka Konigsberg This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citation, bibliographic style, and consistency and is ready for submission to The Graduate School. Dr. Jeffrey Littlefield (Co-Chair) Dr. Tracy Sterling (Co-Chair) Approved for the Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences Dr. Tracy Sterling Approved for The Graduate School Dr. Karlene A. Hoo iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful for the large time and energy investments of my wonderful advisors, Dr. Jeffrey Littlefield and Dr. Tracy Sterling. I also am grateful to my committee members, including Dr. Lisa Rew, and my funding sources including the United States Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and the Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences throughout the pursuit of my Master’s degree. Anne de Meij, Joy Barsotti, Rebecca Clemens, Karen Palmer, Alan Erickson, Zuzana Gedeon, Terry Rick and so many others helped me troubleshoot and offered me encouragement along the way. I also greatly appreciate my family, including Alan Erickson and my parents, sisters, and nieces who continuously offered their love and support in addition to advice and support during the writing process. Finally, I would like to thank the countless students, faculty and staff at both Montana State University and New Mexico Tech who encouraged me to continue. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................1 Background and Statement of Interest ............................................................................1 Field Bindweed Distribution and Biology .......................................................................2 Management ....................................................................................................................4 Herbicide Effects on Plants .............................................................................................5 Herbicides Recommended for Use on Field Bindweed ..................................................8 Biological Control ...........................................................................................................9 History of Biological Control on Field Bindweed ........................................................10 Aceria Malherbae Distribution and Damage ................................................................12 Eriophyid Damage .........................................................................................................14 Factors Affecting Biological Control Establishment ....................................................16 2. IMPACTS OF SUB-LETHAL HERBICIDE APPLICATION ON ACERIA MALHERBAE, A BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT OF FIELD BINDWEED .....................................................................................................19 Introduction ...................................................................................................................19 Hypotheses and Objectives ...............................................................................22 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................23 Plant Care ..........................................................................................................23 Experimental Design and Measurements ..........................................................24 Measurements ...................................................................................................26 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................26 Results ...........................................................................................................................27 Interaction Between Herbicide and A. Malherbae Inoculation ......................................................................................27 Herbicide Effects on Field Bindweed ...............................................................27 Aceria Malherbae Effects on Field Bindweed ..................................................28 Discussion .....................................................................................................................32 Variable Responses of Plants to Herbicide Treatment ..........................................................................................................32 Proposed Phenological Impact on Synergism Between Herbicide and A. Malherbae ..............................................................34 Implications for Management ...........................................................................34 v TABLE OF CONTENTS - CONTINUED 3. INFLUENCE OF WESTERN UNITED STATES FIELD BINDWEED POPULATIONS ON ACERIA MALHERBAE GALL INDUCTION ...........................36 Introduction ...................................................................................................................36 Hypotheses and Objectives ...............................................................................38 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................39 Plant Propagation ..............................................................................................39 Measurements ...................................................................................................40 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................40 Results ...........................................................................................................................41 Interaction Between Location and A. Malherbae Inoculation ......................................................................................41 Location Effect on Field Bindweed Growth .....................................................42 Aceria Malherbae Effects on Field Bindweed ..................................................42 Discussion .....................................................................................................................46 Location and Aceria Malherbae Effects on Field Bindweed .................................................................................................46 Implications for Management ...........................................................................47 4. FIELD SURVEY OF ACERIA MALHERBAE: MITE PRESENCE AND INTER AND INTRA-FIELD SITE HABITAT VARIATIONS ..................................50 Introduction ...................................................................................................................50 Hypotheses and Objectives ...............................................................................51 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................52 Sampling Design and Measurements ................................................................52 Sampling in 2007……………….................................................................52 Sampling in 2012……………………………………………………...…..52 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................56 Analysis of 2007 Data……….………………………….…………………56 Analysis of 2012 Data..…… ………………………………………...……57 Results ...........................................................................................................................58 Results of 2007 Analysis ...................................................................................58 Results of 2012 Analyses ..................................................................................61 Discussion .....................................................................................................................64 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS - CONTINUED REFERENCES CITED ......................................................................................................67 APPENDICES...…………………………….…………………………………………...79 APPENDIX A: Site Characteristics of 71 Sites Surveyed in2007……..………..80 APPENDIX B: Site Characteristics of 15 Sites Surveyed in 2012……………...86 vii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2-1. Herbicide Recommended Rates and 25% Reduced Rates for Herbicide Application on Field Bindweed ............................................................25 2-2. Significance (P) of Treatment Interactions, Herbicide, and Aceria Malherbae on Plant Height, Total Stem Length, Number of Branches, Total Leaves, and Above Ground, Root and Total Plant Biomass of Field Bindweed Plants ........................................................................27 2-3. Growth Response of Field Bindweed to Low Level Herbicide and Inoculation Treatments ..........................................................................................30 2-4. Growth Response of Field Bindweed to Main Effects of Low Level Herbicide Pooled over Inoculation Treatment ......................................................31
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Field Release of the Gall Mite, Aceria Drabae
    United States Department of Field release of the gall mite, Agriculture Aceria drabae (Acari: Marketing and Regulatory Eriophyidae), for classical Programs biological control of hoary Animal and Plant Health Inspection cress (Lepidium draba L., Service Lepidium chalapense L., and Lepidium appelianum Al- Shehbaz) (Brassicaceae), in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, January 2018 Field release of the gall mite, Aceria drabae (Acari: Eriophyidae), for classical biological control of hoary cress (Lepidium draba L., Lepidium chalapense L., and Lepidium appelianum Al-Shehbaz) (Brassicaceae), in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, January 2018 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Potential Use of Phytophagous Mites As Biological Control Agent of Weeds
    Chapter 5 Current and Potential Use of Phytophagous Mites as Biological Control Agent of Weeds Carlos Vásquez, Yelitza Colmenárez, José Morales-Sánchez, Neicy Valera, María F. Sandoval and Diego Balza Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/59953 1. Introduction Biological control of weeds by using phytophagous mites may help to contain infestations and reduce their spread in time. Although, eradication is not the goal due to the vastness of the areas, the most desirable scenario is achieved when weeds are no longer a concern and no other control is necessary. However, biological control should not be considered the unique strategy to face weed problems, thus commonly; other methods are still required to attain the desired level of control. There is an increasingly interest in using mites for biological control of weeds, primarily those belonging to Eriophyidae because of they are host-specific and often weaken the host plant affecting plant growth and reproduction. Although eriophyid mite species impact the fitness of their host plant, it is not clear how much they have contributed to reduction of the population of the target weed. In some cases, natural enemies, resistant plant genotypes, and adverse abiotic conditions have reduced the ability of eriophyid mites to control target weed popula‐ tions. Besides, susceptibility of eriophyids to predators and pathogens may also prevent them from achieving population densities necessary to reduce host plant populations. In addition to eriophyid mites, tetranychid mites are also being considered as an alternative for weed control. The gorse spider mite, Tetranychus lintearius Dufour, has shown to reduce shoot growth on gorse (Ulex europaeus L.) by around 36% in impact studies conducted over 2.5 years in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO
    Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area August 2015 CNHP’s mission is to preserve the natural diversity of life by contributing the essential scientific foundation that leads to lasting conservation of Colorado's biological wealth. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1475 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523 (970) 491-7331 Report Prepared for: United States Air Force Academy Department of Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Smith, P., S. S. Panjabi, and J. Handwerk. 2015. Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Front Cover: Documenting weeds at the US Air Force Academy. Photos courtesy of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program © Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area El Paso County, CO Pam Smith, Susan Spackman Panjabi, and Jill Handwerk Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, orders, and policies require land managers to control noxious weeds. The purpose of this plan is to provide a guide to manage, in the most efficient and effective manner, the noxious weeds on the US Air Force Academy (Academy) and Farish Recreation Area (Farish) over the next 10 years (through 2025), in accordance with their respective integrated natural resources management plans. This plan pertains to the “natural” portions of the Academy and excludes highly developed areas, such as around buildings, recreation fields, and lawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Wheat Curl Mite <I>Aceria Tosichella</I> Keifer
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations and Student Research in Entomology Entomology, Department of 4-2020 Factors Influencing Wheat Curl Mite Aceria tosichella Keifer Dispersal Lindsay M. Overmyer University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologydiss Part of the Entomology Commons Overmyer, Lindsay M., "Factors Influencing Wheat Curl Mite Aceria tosichella Keifer Dispersal" (2020). Dissertations and Student Research in Entomology. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologydiss/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Student Research in Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. FACTORS INFLUENCING WHEAT CURL MITE ACERIA TOSICHELLA KEIFER DISPERSAL by Lindsay M. Overmyer A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfilment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Entomology Under the Supervision of Professor Gary L. Hein Lincoln, Nebraska May 2020 FACTORS INFLUENCING WHEAT CURL MITE ACERIA TOSICHELLA KEIFER DISPERSAL Lindsay M. Overmyer, M.S. University of Nebraska, 2020 Advisor: Gary L. Hein The wheat curl mite (Aceria tosichella Keifer) (WCM) is a vector of three plant viruses to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) including: Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV), Triticum mosaic virus (TriMV), and High Plains wheat mosaic virus. This wheat-mite- virus complex causes significant yield loss in winter wheat across the Great Plains. Management of WCM host plants during the time between wheat harvest and planting of the new wheat crop (the green bridge) is critical in reducing potential risk and loss from this complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Economic Insect Report Is Issued
    Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. * VOL.13 No. April 26, 1963 an*-*-** CONOMIC INSECT REPOR PLANT PEST CONTROL DIVISION AGRICOLTORAL RESEARCH SERVICE ONITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICOLTURE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE PLANT PEST CONTROL DIVISION SURVEY AND DETECTION OPERATIONS The Cooperative Economic Insect Report is issued weekly as a service to American Agriculture. Its contents are compiled from information supplied by cooperating State, Federal, and industrial entomologists and other agricultural workers. In releasing this material the Division serves as a clearing house and does not assume responsibility for ac- curacy of the material. Reports and inquiries pertaining to this release should be mailed to: Survey and Detection Operations Plant Pest Control Division Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture Washington 25, D. C. Volume 13 April 26, 1963 Number 17 COOPERATIVE ECONOMIC INSECT REPORT HIGHLIGHTS ALFALFA WEEVIL larval counts relatively high in areas of Alabama, North Carolina and Virginia; damage noticeable in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, and in New Castle County, Delaware, (pp. 425, 442). SWEETCLOVER WEEVIL feeding conspicuous on sweetclover foliage in several areas of Washington County, Utah, and adults severely damaged seedling sweetclover in Darke and Shelby Counties, Ohio. (p. 425). PEA APHID increasing and causing damage to alfalfa in several areas. High in southwest Missouri; light to heavy in Oklahoma; light to moderate in Washington County, Utah; moderate to heavy in Eddy County, New Mexico; heavy statewide in Arkansas; and severe in areas of Virginia. Less abundant on alfalfa in eastern Washington than at same time in 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Management of Field Bindweed (Convolvulus Arvensis
    United States Department of Agriculture NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Invasive Species Technical Note No. MT-9 February 2007 Ecology and Management of field bindweed [Convolvulus arvensis L.] by Jim Jacobs, NRCS Invasive Species Specialist, Bozeman, Montana Figure 1. Field bindweed forms mats of trailing, twining vines. Abstract Field bindweed is a persistent perennial weed in the Convolvulaceae taxonomic family found on cultivated fields, orchards, plantations, pastures, lawns, gardens, roadsides and along railways. It is listed as one of the ten most serious weed problems worldwide. Its extensive, competitive root system is capable of vegetative reproduction. This combined with long-lived seeds makes it difficult to manage. Dense tangled mats formed from the trailing vines, and vines climbing on crops, reduce crop yields and increase production costs. Over 500 seeds per plant can be produced from the funnel-shaped flowers. Field bindweed is native to the Mediterranean region and was first recorded in the United States in 1739. In Montana, it was first collected in 1891 from Missoula County near the University of Montana, and by 2001 it had been reported from all Montana Counties except Richland and Fallon (http://invader.dbs.umt.edu). Propagules of field bindweed migrate as contaminants of crop seed and hay, when attached to farming equipment, and they have been intentionally introduced as ornamental or medicinal plants. Once established, field bindweed will persist after most control applications. However, the leaves are not shade tolerant and competitive plants will suppress field bindweed and reduce its seed production. On croplands, frequent cultivations will reduce root reserves; however infestations can increase under no-till or reduced till management.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENT STEWARDSHIP ABSTRACT for Convolvulus Arvensis L. Field Bindweed to the User: Element Stewardship Abstracts (Esas) Are Pr
    1 ELEMENT STEWARDSHIP ABSTRACT for Convolvulus arvensis L. Field Bindweed To the User: Element Stewardship Abstracts (ESAs) are prepared to provide The Nature Conservancy's Stewardship staff and other land managers with current management related information on those species and communities that are most important to protect, or most important to control. The abstracts organize and summarize data from numerous sources including literature and researchers and managers actively working with the species or community. We hope, by providing this abstract free of charge, to encourage users to contribute their information to the abstract. This sharing of information will benefit all land managers by ensuring the availability of an abstract that contains up-to-date information on management techniques and knowledgeable contacts. Contributors of information will be acknowledged within the abstract. For ease of update and retrievability, the abstracts are stored on computer. Anyone with comments, questions, or information on current or past monitoring, research, or management programs for the species described in this abstract is encouraged to contact The Nature Conservancy’s Wildland Weeds Management and Research Program. This abstract is a compilation of available information and is not an endorsement of particular practices or products. Please do not remove this cover statement from the attached abstract. Author of this Abstract: Kelly E. Lyons Evolution and Ecology, University of California at Davis. THE NATURE CONSERVANCY 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203-1606 (703) 841-5300 2 SPECIES CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME Convolvulus arvensis L. Convolvulus is derived from the Latin, convolere, meaning to entwine, and arvensis means ‘of fields’ (Gray, 1970).
    [Show full text]
  • An Ultrastructural Study of the Relationship Between the Mite Floracarus Perrepae Knihinicki & Boczek (Acariformes:Eriophyidae) and the Fern
    1 Running title: Floracarus ultrastructure For submission to Australian Journal of Entomology An ultrastructural study of the relationship between the mite Floracarus perrepae Knihinicki & Boczek (Acariformes:Eriophyidae) and the fern Lygodium microphyllum (Cav.) R. Br. (Lygodiaceae) Thomas P. Freeman,1* John A. Goolsby,2 Sebahat K. Ozman,3 Dennis R. Nelson4 1North Dakota State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, Fargo, North Dakota, USA 2USDA-ARS, Australian Biological Control Laboratory, 120 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, 4068, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 3CRC for Tropical Plant Protection and Dept. of Zoology and Entomology, The University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; current address, Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, 55139, Samsun, Turkey 4USDA-ARS, Biosciences Research Laboratory, 1605 Albrecht Blvd, Fargo, North Dakota, USA *Corresponding author (email: [email protected], telephone: 701-231-8234, facsimile: 701-239-1395) 2 ABSTRACT The ultrastructure of Floracarus perrepae was investigated in relation to its host, Lygodium microphyllum. Feeding by the mite induces a change in epidermal cell size, and cell division is stimulated by mite feeding, causing the leaf margin to curl over into a roll with two to three windings. The enlarged epidermal layer greatly increases its cytoplasmic contents, which become a nutritive tissue for the mite and its progeny. The structure and depth of stylet penetration by the mite, and the thickness of the epidermal cell wall of L. microphyllum, does not appear to account for the mite’s differential ability to induce leaf rolling in its co- adapted host from southeast Queensland but not in the invasive genotype of the fern in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Water Relations of Adult and Juvenile Tortoise Beetles: Differences Among Sympatric Species
    Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 135 (2003) 625–634 Comparative water relations of adult and juvenile tortoise beetles: differences among sympatric species Helen M. Hull-Sanders*, Arthur G. Appel, Micky D. Eubanks Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, 301 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849-5413, USA Received 5 February 2003; received in revised form 20 May 2003; accepted 20 May 2003 Abstract Relative abundance of two sympatric tortoise beetles varies between drought and ‘wet’ years. Differing abilities to conserve water may influence beetle survival in changing environments. Cuticular permeability (CP), percentage of total body water (%TBW), rate of water loss and percentage of body lipid content were determined for five juvenile stages and female and male adults of two sympatric species of chrysomelid beetles, the golden tortoise beetle, Charidotella bicolor (F. ) and the mottled tortoise beetle, Deloyala guttata (Olivier). There were significant differences in %TBW and lipid content among juvenile stages. Second instars had the greatest difference in CP (37.98 and 11.13 mg cmy2 hy1 mmHgy1 for golden and mottled tortoise beetles, respectively). Mottled tortoise beetles had lower CP and greater %TBW compared with golden tortoise beetles, suggesting that they can conserve a greater amount of water and may tolerate drier environmental conditions. This study suggests that juvenile response to environmental water stress may differentially affect the survival of early instars and thus affect the relative abundance of adult beetles in the field. This is supported by the low relative abundance of golden tortoise beetle larvae in a drought year and the higher abundance in two ‘wet’ years.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Groups of Insects, Mites and Spiders
    List Supplemental Information Content Taxonomic Groups of Insects, Mites and Spiders Pests of trees and shrubs Class Arachnida, Spiders and mites elm bark beetle, smaller European Scolytus multistriatus Order Acari, Mites and ticks elm bark beetle, native Hylurgopinus rufipes pine bark engraver, Ips pini Family Eriophyidae, Leaf vagrant, gall, erinea, rust, or pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda eriophyid mites ash flower gall mite, Aceria fraxiniflora Order Hemiptera, True bugs, aphids, and scales elm eriophyid mite, Aceria parulmi Family Adelgidae, Pine and spruce aphids eriophyid mites, several species Cooley spruce gall adelgid, Adelges cooleyi hemlock rust mite, Nalepella tsugifoliae Eastern spruce gall adelgid, Adelges abietis maple spindlegall mite, Vasates aceriscrumena hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae maple velvet erineum gall, several species pine bark adelgid, Pineus strobi Family Tarsonemidae, Cyclamen and tarsonemid mites Family Aphididae, Aphids cyclamen mite, Phytonemus pallidus balsam twig aphid, Mindarus abietinus Family Tetranychidae, Freeranging, spider mites, honeysuckle witches’ broom aphid, tetranychid mites Hyadaphis tataricae boxwood spider mite, Eurytetranychus buxi white pine aphid, Cinara strobi clover mite, Bryobia praetiosa woolly alder aphid, Paraprociphilus tessellatus European red mite, Panonychus ulmi woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum honeylocust spider mite, Eotetranychus multidigituli Family Cercopidae, Froghoppers or spittlebugs spruce spider mite, Oligonychus ununguis spittlebugs, several
    [Show full text]
  • Bonner Zoologische Beiträge
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Bonn zoological Bulletin - früher Bonner Zoologische Beiträge. Jahr/Year: 2005/2006 Band/Volume: 54 Autor(en)/Author(s): Aslan Irfan, Beenen Ron, Özbek Hikmet Artikel/Article: Biological Aspects of Galeruca circassica Reitter, 1889 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) in Relation to the Weed Cephalaria procera, Fish, and Lall. (Dipsacaceae) in Anatolia 173-177 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zoologicalbulletin.de; www.biologiezentrum.at Bonner zoologische Beiträge Band 54 (2005) Heft 4 Seiten 173-177 Bonn, Oktober 2006 Biological Aspects of Galénica circassica Reitter, 1889 (Coleóptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) in Relation to the Weed Cephalaria procera^ 1 Fish, and Lall. (Dipsacaceae) in Anatolia 2 1 ' Irían Aslan", Ron BEENEN ' & Hikmet ÖZBEK 1 'Atatürk University, Agricultural Faculty, Plant Production Department, Erzurum, Turkey ' Nieuwegein, The Netherlands Abstract. Biological aspects of Galénica circassica, a herbivore feeding on Cephalaria procera, were studied in Tur- key. In the laboratory, adults oviposited on Cephalaria procera from 9 days after emergence and laid an average of 198 eggs per female. Development of eggs and larvae proved to be temperature dependant. Larvae passed through four in- stars and pupated in a pupal case in the soil. Pupal stage lasted 48 days. Laboratory tests indicated that this species can complete its development on several Cephalaria species and on Salvia staminea and Centaurea solstitialis. Only on Cephalaria procera and C. hirsute a substantial percentage reached the adult stage. Galénica circassica should be pre- served in Eastern Anatolia because it most probably contributes in regulating the abundance of Cephalaria procera and because it might be used in biocontrol.
    [Show full text]
  • Matching the Origin of an Invasive Weed for Selection of a Herbivore
    Molecular Ecology (2006) 15, 287–297 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02788.x MatchingBlackwell Publishing Ltd the origin of an invasive weed for selection of a herbivore haplotype for a biological control programme JOHN A. GOOLSBY,*† PAUL J. DE BARRO,‡ JEFFREY R. MAKINSON,†,‡ ROBERT W. PEMBERTON,§ DIANA M. HARTLEY¶ and DONALD R. FROHLICH** *United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beneficial Insects Research Unit, 2413 E. Hwy. 83, Weslaco, TX 78596, USA, †United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Australian Biological Control Laboratory, CSIRO Long Pocket Laboratories, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia, ‡CSIRO Entomology, Long Pocket Laboratories, 120 Meiers Rd, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia, §United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3205 College Ave. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA, ¶CSIRO Entomology, Black Mountain Laboratories, Clunies Ross St., ACT 2601, Australia, **Department of Biology, University of St Thomas, 3800 Montrose Blvd, Houston, TX 77006, USA Abstract The Florida Everglades have been invaded by an exotic weed fern, Lygodium microphyllum. Across its native distribution in the Old World tropics from Africa to Australasia it was found to have multiple location-specific haplotypes. Within this distribution, the climbing fern is attacked by a phytophagous mite, Floracarus perrepae, also with multiple haplotypes. The genetic relationship between mite and fern haplotypes was matched by an overarching geographical relationship between the two. Further, mites that occur in the same location as a particular fern haplotype were better able to utilize the fern than mites from more distant locations. From a biological control context, we are able to show that the weed fern in the Everglades most likely originated in northern Queensland, Australia/Papua New Guinea and that the mite from northern Queensland offers the greatest prospect for control.
    [Show full text]