DOCSLIB.ORG

2030 Committee Texas Transportation Needs Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2030 Committee Texas Transportation Needs Report 2030 Committee Texas Transportation Needs Report February 2009 2030 Committee Members C. Michael Walton (Chair) The Honorable Ed Emmett Ernest Cockrell Centennial Chair in Harris County Judge Engineering Houston The University of Texas at Austin Austin Tom Johnson Executive Vice President David Marcus (Vice Chair) Associated General Contractors of Texas Managing Partner Austin Marcus, Fairall, Bristol + Co., LLP El Paso David Laney Attorney at Law Ken Allen Dallas Senior Vice President Supply Chain and Logistics Cullen Looney HEB Attorney at Law San Antonio Edinburg Ruben Bonilla, Jr. Drayton McLane, Jr. Chairman Chairman, McLane Group Port of Corpus Christi Commission Temple Corpus Christi Roger Nober Drew Crutcher Executive Vice President, Law and President Secretary Landgraf, Crutcher and Associates, Inc. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation Odessa Fort Worth Gary Thomas President and Executive Director Dallas Area Rapid Transit Dallas Page i Table of Contents List of Exhibits ............................................................................................................................ vii Acknowledgments ..........................................................................................................................x Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 About the 2030 Committee ........................................................................................................1 2030 Report Context ..................................................................................................................1 Historical Perspective ......................................................................................................... 2 Texas Transportation Today ............................................................................................... 2 Report Scope ....................................................................................................................... 3 Difficult Decisions Ahead................................................................................................... 4 Results of Public Input ...............................................................................................................4 Sources .......................................................................................................................................6 Pavement Maintenance .................................................................................................................7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................7 Current Conditions .....................................................................................................................8 Analysis of Existing On-System Mileage ..................................................................................8 Analysis of Added Capacity Mileage ................................................................................. 9 Scope of This Study ............................................................................................................ 9 The TxDOT On-System Highway Network ..............................................................................9 Treatment Costs .......................................................................................................................11 Comparison with Peer States ...................................................................................................12 Routine Maintenance Expenditures .........................................................................................12 Estimated Preventive Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Needs ............................... 14 Conclusions ..............................................................................................................................19 Committee Recommendations: ................................................................................................19 Sources .....................................................................................................................................20 Bridge Maintenance .....................................................................................................................21 Introduction and Bridge Data Sources .....................................................................................21 Current Conditions ...................................................................................................................21 Texas and Nationwide Bridge Statistics ..................................................................................22 Status of Texas Bridges ...........................................................................................................23 Texas Bridge Expenditures ......................................................................................................25 Eligibility for Federal Funds ....................................................................................................26 Forecasting Texas Bridge Needs .............................................................................................27 Current Rehabilitation and Replacement Unit Costs ........................................................ 27 Technical Analysis ...................................................................................................................28 Current Bridge Replacement Costs ................................................................................... 28 Page iii Bridge Replacement Costs through 2030 ......................................................................... 29 Mobility-Generated Bridges ............................................................................................. 31 Costs of Inspection for Existing and Mobility-Generated Bridges ................................... 32 Costs of Maintenance for Existing and Mobility-Generated Bridges ............................... 33 Special and Large Bridges ................................................................................................ 36 Cost Summaries for Texas Bridge Needs through 2030 ..........................................................36 Conclusions ..............................................................................................................................37 Committee Recommendations .................................................................................................38 Urban Mobility .............................................................................................................................39 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................39 Organization of This Chapter............................................................................................ 40 Current Conditions ...................................................................................................................40 The Mobility Scenarios ............................................................................................................41 Scenario Descriptions ....................................................................................................... 42 How Are Solutions Implemented Over the Next 22 Years? ....................................................42 Benefits Resulting from Mobility Improvements ....................................................................45 Direct Benefits to Texans.................................................................................................. 45 Indirect Personal Benefits to Texans ................................................................................ 45 Economic Value of Mobility Investments to Texas Businesses ....................................... 45 What Will the Improvements Cost? .................................................................................. 46 Mobility Results from Investment Scenarios ...........................................................................47 Key Findings for Each Scenario ..............................................................................................48 Comparing the Benefits and Costs .................................................................................... 49 Potential Reductions in Both Total Implementation Costs and the State’s Share of Those Costs ....................................................................................................................... 49 What Mobility Goal is the Right One? ............................................................................. 51 What’s Next? ...........................................................................................................................53 Committee Recommendations .................................................................................................53 Rural Mobility and Safety ...........................................................................................................54 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................54 The Rural Transportation Challenge ........................................................................................54 Current Conditions ...................................................................................................................54
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4-Year Work Plan by District for Fys 2015-2018
    4 Year Work Plan by District for FYs 2015 - 2018 Overview Section §201.998 of the Transportation code requires that a Department Work Program report be provided to the Legislature. Under this law, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) provides the following information within this report. Consistently-formatted work program for each of TxDOT's 25 districts based on Unified Transportation Program. Covers four-year period and contains all projects that the district proposes to implement during that period. Includes progress report on major transportation projects and other district projects. Per 43 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 16 Subchapter C rule §16.106, a major transportation project is the planning, engineering, right of way acquisition, expansion, improvement, addition, or contract maintenance, other than the routine or contracted routine maintenance, of a bridge, highway, toll road, or toll road system on the state highway system that fulfills or satisfies a particular need, concern, or strategy of the department in meeting the transportation goals established under §16.105 of this subchapter (relating to Unified Transportation Program (UTP)). A project may be designated by the department as a major transportation project if it meets one or more of the criteria specified below: 1) The project has a total estimated cost of $500 million or more. All costs associated with the project from the environmental phase through final construction, including adequate contingencies and reserves for all cost elements, will be included in computing the total estimated cost regardless of the source of funding. The costs will be expressed in year of expenditure dollars. 2) There is a high level of public or legislative interest in the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Ports 2017-2018 Capital Program: Project Summaries
    Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES Port of s Orange Port of Beaumont a Port of Cedar Bayou Port Arthur Port of Navigation District x Houston Te Port of Texas City Port of Galveston Port of Freeport Port of Bay City Calhoun Port Authority Victoria County Port of Navigation District Palacios Port of West Calhoun Aransas County Navigation District ico Port of x Corpus Christi e M f o Port Mansfield f l Port of Harlingen Port of Port Isabel u Port of Brownsville G Port Authority Advisory Committee LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN s chairman of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC), I am pleased to Apresent the Texas Ports 2017–2018 Capital Program. Texas has the most robust maritime system in the United States. In 2015, Texas was ranked first in the nation in total foreign imports and exports and second in the nation for total tonnage. The state’s maritime system continues to be a critical gateway to international trade and provides the residents of the state with a multitude of economic opportunities through the movement of waterborne commerce and trade. In 2015, the Texas Ports Association conducted an economic study focused on defining the value of Texas ports to the state and the nation. Maritime activity at Texas ports: • Moved over 563 million tons of cargo including 350 million tons of international tonnage and nearly 200 million tons of domestic cargo • Handled over 1.8 million containers • Served over 1.6 million cruise passengers • Supported over 1.5 million jobs in the state • Provided over $368 billion in total economic value to the state, 23% of the overall state GDP • Generated over $92 billion in personal income and local consumption of goods • Generated $6.9 billion of state and local taxes Texas ports are critical economic engines for their communities and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • US Development Group to Open State-Of-The-Art $130 Million Multi
    US Development Group to open state-of-the-art $130 million multi-modal terminal in Port Arthur Project to create more than 1,200 construction jobs and more than 40 long-term jobs in Jefferson County PORT ARTHUR, Texas — (December 15, 2020) – US Development Group, LLC (USDG), through Port Arthur Terminal LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary, today announced the development of a multi-modal oil handling terminal in Port Arthur, Texas. The terminal is specially designed to handle DRUbit™, a proprietary blend of Canadian heavy crude oil formulated to be non-hazardous and non-flammable for transportation by rail. Scheduled for completion in the second quarter of 2021, the Port Arthur Terminal represents a capital investment of more than $130 million that is expected to bring more than 1,200 direct and indirect construction jobs to the City of Port Arthur and Jefferson County as well as more than 40 full-time jobs once the facility begins commercial operations. “USDG is pleased to be part of the Port Arthur community and construct the first-of-its-kind destination terminal,” said Dan Borgen, US Development Group CEO and President. “By giving producers in the Canadian oil sands a safe and efficient means of transporting product to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries and manufacturers, we anticipate the new terminal will represent a long-term investment for USDG with continued growth. We look forward to playing a role in the economic prosperity of Port Arthur and Jefferson County in the coming years. Moreover, USDG’s patented DRUbit™ process produces a non- hazardous transportation product that has great economic benefits for Port Arthur area refineries.” “We would like to recognize several city and county leaders who were instrumental in making the Port Arthur terminal project come to fruition, including the Honorable County Judge Jeff Branick and the Jefferson County Commissioners, the Honorable Mayor Thurman Bill Bartie and the Port Arthur City Council, City Manager Ron Burton and their combined staffs.
    [Show full text]
  • 37.99 ACRES of LAND Sabine Pass @ Intracoastal Canal Pleasure Island, Port Arthur, Texas
    37.99 ACRES OF LAND Sabine Pass @ Intracoastal Canal Pleasure Island, Port Arthur, Texas For Sale By: Fred Ghabriel Bejjani & Associates 713.659.3333 Sabine Pass / Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Land Pleasure Island, Highway 82/Ship Channel Port Arthur, TX 77643 Disclaimer DISCLAIMER STATEMENT This confidential memorandum has been prepared solely for information purposes and is not to be used for any other purpose. No representations or warranties, express or implied, by operation of law or otherwise, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, or as to the condition, quality or fitness of the property and neither Seller nor Bejjani & Associates nor any of their respective directors, officers, employees, stockholders, owners, affiliates, or agents will have any liability to receiving party or any other person resulting from receiving party's or any other person's use of this confidential memorandum. The property will be sold "as is", "where is" and "with all faults" as of the date of closing. Receiving party will have an opportunity to perform its own examination and inspection of the property and information relating to same and must rely solely on its own independent examination and investigation and not on any information provided by Seller or Bejjani & Associates. Page 2 of 14 Sabine Pass / Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Land Pleasure Island, Highway 82/Ship Channel Port Arthur, TX 77643 Property Description Asking Price Please Call Property 37.99 Acres Sabine Pass / Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Land Pleasure Island Highway 82/Ship Channel Jefferson County Port Arthur, TX 77643 For Lease or Sale 37.99 Acres (Or Partial) Location The property is sandwiched between the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (Sabine- Neches Ship Channel) and State Highway 82, on Pleasure Island, Port Arthur - Gulf of Mexico, Jefferson County, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook
    TTI: 0-6890 Port Authority Transportation Reinvestment Zone Development and Implementation Guidebook Technical Report 0-6890-P1 Cooperative Research Program TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6890-P1.pdf PORT AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION REINVESTMENT ZONE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION GUIDEBOOK by: Rafael M. Aldrete Abhisek Mudgal Senior Research Scientist Assistant Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Sharada Vadali Juan Carlos Villa Associate Research Scientist Research Scientist Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Carl James Kruse Lorenzo Cornejo Research Scientist Assistant Transportation Researcher Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute David Salgado Deog Sang Bae Associate Transportation Researcher Graduate Assistant Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M Transportation Institute Product 0-6890-P1 Project 0-6890 Project Title: Tools for Port TRZs and TRZs for Multimodal Applications Performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation Published: March 2017 TEXAS A&M TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this product reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies
    [Show full text]
  • Port At-A-Glance
    PORT AT-A-GLANCE Port of Orange • Orange, TX Orange County Navigation & Port District Legal Name: Orange County Navigation and Port District 1201 Childers Road Draft: Deep Table of Contents Orange, Texas 77632 (409) 883-4363 Depth: 30 ft. channel www.portoforange.com Width: 200 ft. 1. Calhoun Port Authority Port Director 2. Port of Bay City Gene Bouillion Tonnage¹ 3. Port of Beaumont Quick Facts: The Port of Orange is 94,504 4. Port of BrownsvilleF oreign Trade Zone: #117 located on the Sabine- Neches waterway and is 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,0005. 100,000Port of Corpus Christi linked to the “Golden Triangle” ports which 6. Port Freeport include the Port of Port Arthur, Beaumont and 7. Port of Galveston Orange. This area has 8. Port of Harlingen become strategically more important to Texas Annual Economic Impact: $ 1.9 million9. Port of Houston ports growth since 2003. 10. Port of Port Isabel The Port of Orange has Top Commodities Connectivity acted as a successful 11. Port of Orange landlord port, On-site Marine Services which Rail complementing activities include: 12. Port of PalaciosOrange Port Terminal at larger ports on the Shipyards that can Railway providing Sabine-Neches channel. accommodate new 13. Port of Portswitching Arthur service to It is also used for lay construction Union Pacific and berthing. 14. Port of Port Mansfield Repairs of tugs, barges and agreement with BNSF. offshore petroleum drilling 15. Port of Texas City platforms Roadway Connection Dry dock services for barges 16. Port of VictoriaSH 87 and tugs IH 10 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Authority Advisory Committee Minutes
    July 2, 2018 1 These are the minutes of the regular meeting of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (the Committee) held on July 2, 2018 in Houston, Texas. The meeting was called to order at 9:16 a.m. by Acting Chair John LaRue with the following committee members present: Port Authority Advisory Committee: John LaRue Port of Corpus Christi – Acting chair Roger Guenther Houston Port Authority Chris Fisher Port of Beaumont - Teleconference Eduardo Campirano Port of Brownsville Larry Kelley Port of Port Arthur Jennifer Stastny Port of Victoria Phyllis Saathoff Chair, Port Freeport -Teleconference Michael Plank Lt. Governor Appointee – Teleconference Alan Ritter Speaker of the House Appointee-Absent A public notice of this meeting containing all items on the proposed agenda was filed in the Office of the Secretary of State at 9:49a.m. September 7, 2018 as required by Government Code, Chapter 551, referred to as “The Open Meetings Act.” ITEM 2. Introduction of committee members and TxDOT staff. John LaRue, acting chair, asked committee members, TxDOT and guests to introduce themselves. ITEM 3. Approval of minutes of the July 2, 2018 meeting. (Action) Roger Guenther made a motion that the meeting minutes be accepted with a second by Larry Kelley and the Committee approved the minutes of the July 2, 2018 meeting by a vote of 5-0. ITEM 4. Approval of the final Rider 45 project list. (Action) Stephanie Cribbs, TxDOT Maritime Division employee, presented the results of the third call for projects for the Rider 45 grant program. A total of $5,403,743 in grant funds was available with 11 projects competing for the funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Freight Mobility Plan Program and Project Appendices
    Texas Freight Mobility Plan Program and Project Appendices Final January 25, 2016 This page is intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Appendix A: Relationship between Goals and Objectives ................................ A-1 to A-12 Appendix B: Programs ....................................................................................... B-1 to B-12 Appendix C1: Current Highway Projects* .................................................. C1-1 to C1-102 Appendix C2: Current Highway Needs .......................................................... C2-1 to C2-30 Appendix D: Rail Projects* .................................................................................. D-1 to D-8 Appendix E: Seaport and Waterway Projects* ................................................... E-1 to E-16 Appendix F1: Air Cargo Highway Projects* ...................................................... F1-1 to F1-6 Appendix F2: Air Cargo Highway Needs ........................................................... F2-1 to F2-4 Appendix G1: Border/POE Projects* ........................................................... G1-1 to G1-30 Appendix G2: Rail Border/POE Projects* ....................................................... G2-1 to G2-4 Appendix H: Public Comment Period of Draft Freight Plan Document ........... H-1 to H-100 * The following list of projects represent opportunities identified by various stakeholders via independent planning processes that could expand freight capacity and/or improve freight mobility. Projects priorities reflect independent
    [Show full text]
  • Lone Star State Ports Setting Records, Enhancing Diverse Cargo Infrastructure
    Lone Star State ports setting records, enhancing diverse cargo infrastructure by Paul Scott Abbott 5 hours ago | Published in Issue 704 Page 1: Port Houston Page 2: Port of Port Arthur Page 3: Port of Beaumont Page 4: Port of Galveston Page 5: Port Freeport Page 6: Calhoun Port Authority Page 7: Port of Corpus Christi Page 8: Port of Brownsville With record cargo volumes seemingly becoming commonplace, ports throughout Texas are assertively forging ahead with a multitude of infrastructure enhancements to handle even more activity in the future. Recent developments include not only expansions of on-terminal capabilities but also, in a number of cases, the advancement of deeper, wider ship channels. Beginning with Port Houston, the longtime No. 1 U.S. foreign tonnage port, then heading east to the Sabine-Neches Waterway facilities of Port Arthur and Beaumont before taking a southwestward jaunt along the Texas Gulf Coast to just north of the Mexico border, here’s the latest going on at key ports of the Lone Star State: Port Houston Marking a fourth consecutive year of double-digit growth in containerized cargo volume, Port Houston handled a record 2,987,291 twenty-foot-equivalent units in 2019 while adding three new container services and two general cargo liner services. Loaded container exports, buoyed by shipments of polyethylene resins, led the way with a 17 percent year-over-year increase. Overall tonnage moving through Port Houston public facilities also reached an all-time high last year, rising 5 percent over the preceding 12-month period, to 37.8 million tons.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED DECEMBER 6, 2016 NEW ISSUE RATING: Moody’s Investors Service “Aa3” BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY (see “OTHER INFORMATION – Municipal Rating” herein) THE BONDS ARE NOT OBLIGATIONS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 103(A) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986, AS AMENDED. SEE “TAX MATTERS” HEREIN. $20,930,000* PORT OF PORT ARTHUR NAVIGATION DISTRICT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS (A political subdivision of the State of Texas having boundaries within Jefferson County) UNLIMITED TAX PORT REFUNDING BONDS, TAXABLE SERIES 2016B Dated Date: December 1, 2016 Due: March 1 — See inside cover page (Interest Accrues from the Date of Delivery) Port of Port Arthur Navigation District of Jefferson County, Texas (the “District”) is issuing its Unlimited Tax Port Refunding Bonds, Taxable Series 2016B (the “Bonds”) pursuant to the Constitution and general laws of the State of Texas, (the “State”) including Chapter 197, Acts of the 58th Legislature, Regular Session 1963, as amended, Chapters 1207 and 1371, Texas Government Code, as amended, an election held on May 10, 2008 (the “2008 Election”), and the order authorizing the Bonds. The Bonds are direct obligations of the District and are payable from the receipts of an annual ad valorem tax, without legal limit as to rate or amount, levied all on taxable property within the District as provided in the Order. The Bonds are not issued by, nor are they in any way obligations of the State of Texas, Jefferson County or any other entity other than the District. See “DESCRIPTION OF THE BONDS — Source of Payment of the Bonds.” Simultaneously with the issuance of the Bonds, the District plans to issue $3,445,000* Unlimited Tax Port Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A (the “Series 2016A Bonds”).
    [Show full text]
  • Port Arthur Business Park [email protected]
    350 Pine Street Beaumont, Texas 77701 Phone: 1-800-729-7483 Port Arthur Business Park [email protected] Port Arthur, Texas entergy-texas.com Kansas Springfield Illinois Illinois Kentucky Missouri Clarksville Contents Nashville-Davidson Tulsa Springdale Broken Arrow Fayetteville Franklin Murfreesboro Jonesboro Tennessee Edmond Jackson Oklahoma City Oklahoma Norman Fort Smith Chattanooga Memphis Arkansas Huntsville Lawton Little Rock Georgia Wichita Falls Birmingham Hoover Denton Tuscaloosa Plano Allen Carrollton Irving Dallas Garland Alabama Fort Worth Grand Prairie Abilene Mesquite Mississippi Arlington Montgomery Longview Shreveport Tyler Jackson San Angelo Waco Temple Texas Killeen Louisiana Mobile Bryan Florida Round Rock College Station Baton Rouge Austin Gulfport Lafayette The Woodlands Lake Charles Beaumont Atascocita Kenner Houston Metairie Bay San Antonio Sugar Land Pearland League City Victoria Corpus Christi Laredo Note: Select Census Designated Places >= 60,000 Population 350 Pine Street Beaumont, Texas 77701 JEFFERSON COUNTY Port Arthur Business Park Phone: 1-800-729-7483 [email protected] Aerial Site Map entergy-texas.com VICINITY 90 10 69 LEGEND Property Boundary NOTE These drawings are provided merely to assist in economic development efforts. The Entergy Companies make no representations or warranties whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of any information contained herein nor the condition or suitability of any properties. Users should direct inquiries about any property to the listing broker for that
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT SUMMARIES Port Authority Advisory Committee
    Port Authority Advisory Committee TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARIES Port Authority Advisory Committee Port of s Orange Port of Beaumont a Port of Cedar Bayou Port Arthur Port of Navigation District x Houston Te Port of Texas City Port of Galveston Port of Freeport Port of Bay City Calhoun Port Authority Victoria County Port of Navigation District Palacios Port of West Calhoun Aransas County Navigation District ico Port of x Corpus Christi e M f o Port Mansfield f l Port of Harlingen Port of Port Isabel u Port of Brownsville G TEXAS PORTS 2017 – 2018 CAPITAL PROGRAM Page 1 Port Authority Advisory Committee LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN s chairman of the Port Authority Advisory Committee (PAAC), I am pleased to Apresent the Texas Ports 2017–2018 Capital Program. Texas has the most robust maritime system in the United States. In 2015, Texas was ranked first in the nation in total foreign imports and exports and second in the nation for total tonnage. The state’s maritime system continues to be a critical gateway to international trade and provides the residents of the state with a multitude of economic opportunities through the movement of waterborne commerce and trade. In 2015, the Texas Ports Association conducted an economic study focused on defining the value of Texas ports to the state and the nation. Maritime activity at Texas ports: • Moved over 563 million tons of cargo including 350 million tons of international tonnage and nearly 200 million tons of domestic cargo • Handled over 1.8 million containers • Served over 1.6 million cruise passengers • Supported over 1.5 million jobs in the state • Provided over $368 billion in total economic value to the state, 23% of the overall state GDP • Generated over $92 billion in personal income and local consumption of goods • Generated $6.9 billion of state and local taxes Texas ports are critical economic engines for their communities and the state.
    [Show full text]