DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2010 Annual Report 2010 Vision Key fi gures Lufthansa Group 2010 2009 Change in % Revenue and result Total revenue €m 27,324 22,283 22.6 of which traffi c revenue €m 22,268 17,604 26.5 Operating result €m 876 130 573.8 EBIT €m 1,335 191 599.0 EBITDA €m 3,049 1,838 65.9 Net profi t/loss €m 1,131 – 34 Key balance sheet and cash fl ow statement fi gures Total assets €m 29,320 26,392 11.1 Equity ratio % 28.4 23.5 4.9 pts Net indebtedness €m 1,596 2,195 – 27.3 Cash fl ow from operating activities €m 3,075 1,991 54.4 Capital expenditure (gross) €m 2,273 2,405 – 5.5 Key profi tability and value creation fi gures Adjusted operating margin1) % 4.1 1.4 2.7 pts EBITDA margin % 11.2 8.2 3.0 pts CVA €m 71 – 858 CFROI % 9.4 4.2 5.2 pts Lufthansa share Share price at year-end € 16.36 11.75 39.2 Earnings per share € 2.47 – 0.07 Suggested dividend per share € 0.60 – Traffi c fi gures 2) Passengers thousands 91,157 77,315 17.9 Freight and mail thousand tonnes 2,023 1,712 18.2 Passenger load factor % 79.3 77.9 1.3 pts Cargo load factor % 68.0 60.6 7.4 pts Flights number 1,021,266 899,928 13.5 Employees Average number of employees number 117,066 112,320 4.2 Employees as of 31.12. number 117,019 117,521 – 0.4 1) Performance indicator to enable comparison with other airlines: (operating result + write-backs of provisions) / revenue. 2) Lufthansa Group without Germanwings. Date of publication: 17 March 2011. Revenue in €m Operating result in €m 19,849 22,420 24,842 22,283 27,324 845 1,378 1,280 130 876 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Lufthansa Group overview 2010 fi gures Key fi gures business segments Passenger Airline Group 2010 Change Passenger Airline Group The airlines in the in % Passenger Airline Group made good use of the 27.3 Revenue €m 20,912 24.5 positive demand trend. Passenger numbers Revenue of which external revenue €m 20,233 24.7 went up sharply and at the same time the airlines Operating result €m 436 – in EUR bn Adjusted operating margin % 3.0 2.2 pts continued their cost management, realising Segment result €m 572 – important synergies. Increased profi tability meant EBITDA1) €m 2,601 81.9 that a sound operating profi t was earned again, CVA €m – 198 71.4 Segment capital expenditure €m 2,047 7.9 in spite of non-recurring expenses. Employees as of 31.12. number 57,157 – 1.6 1) Before profi t/loss transfer from other shareholders. Logistics 2010 Change Logistics The earnings turnaround was even in % more pronounced in the Logistics segment. 876 Revenue €m 2,795 43.3 Lufthansa Cargo benefi ted particularly from the Operating result of which external revenue €m 2,770 43.7 global economic recovery and the boom in Operating result €m 310 – in EUR m Adjusted operating margin % 11.4 19.4 pts German exports. The measures taken in prior Segment result €m 330 – years to safeguard earnings continued to have EBITDA €m 445 – a strong effect. Following an operating loss CVA €m 233 Segment capital expenditure €m 21 – 16.0 in the previous year, Lufthansa Cargo reported Employees as of 31.12. number 4,517 0.6 record profi ts in 2010. MRO 2010 Change MRO Lufthansa Technik is a late-cycle player in % and so suffered from still hesitant demand in 1,625 Revenue €m 4,018 1.4 the MRO market in 2010. Thanks to greater pro- Free cash fl ow of which external revenue €m 2,373 3.3 duction fl exibility and a broader product portfolio Operating result €m 268 – 15.2 in EUR m Adjusted operating margin % 7.4 – 0.9 pts it was nevertheless able to continue its growth Segment result €m 319 – 3.6 path and increase revenue. Lufthansa Technik EBITDA €m 412 – 5.5 again generated a strong operating profi t, but CVA €m 172 4.9 Segment capital expenditure €m 67 – 44.6 as expected, it was below the record set the Employees as of 31.12. number 20,159 1.8 previous year. IT Services 2010 Change IT Services Lufthansa Systems offers IT solu- in % tions for the airline industry and, despite the still 71 Revenue €m 595 – 1.7 diffi cult environment for the sector, was able to Cash value added of which external revenue €m 232 – 4.9 win new customers and orders. Revenue and Operating result €m 10 – 37.5 in EUR m Adjusted operating margin % 1.8 –1.0 pts earnings nevertheless remain under pressure. Segment result €m – 6 In 2010 a programme was therefore launched EBITDA €m 45 – 16.7 to reorient the company. Steps to cut costs and CVA €m – 23 Segment capital expenditure €m 36 – 30.8 increase revenue are intended to shore up its Employees as of 31.12. number 2,935 – 3.0 competitiveness sustainably. Catering 2010 Change Catering LSG Sky Chefs increased its revenue in % and confi rmed its global market leadership 39.2 Revenue €m 2,249 7.0 in airline catering by expanding its range and Total shareholder of which external revenue €m 1,716 8.0 signing new partnerships. Its operating profi t Operating result €m 76 5.6 return in per cent Adjusted operating margin % 3.4 – 0.1 pts was even higher than the previous year’s, which Segment result €m 87 16.0 had been buoyed by non-recurring factors. EBITDA €m 174 45.0 The business segment benefi ted from higher CVA €m – 28 58.8 Segment capital expenditure €m 38 – 34.5 passenger numbers and the recovery in the Employees as of 31.12. number 28,499 0.4 premium segment. LufthansaContents GroupGroup overview 20102 fi gures KeyKey fi gures businessbusiness segments Passenger Airline GroupGroup 2010 Change PassengerPassenger Airline GroupGroup TThehe airlinesairlines in thethe in % PassengerPassenger Airline GGrouproup made ggoodood use of the 27.32 1 To our shareholders positivepositive demand trend. PassengerPassenger numbers RevenueRevenu e 2 Letter to the€m€m shareholders20,91220,912 24.5 RevenueR of which external revenue €m€m 20,23320,233 24.7 went up sharplysharply and at the same time the airlines OperatingOperatin g resultresult 4 Executive€m Board of4364 36Deutsche– Lufthansa AG ini EUR bn continuedcontinued their cost management,management, realisirealisingng Adjusted operatingoperating6 marginmar gInterviewin % 3.03.0 2.2 ptspts SegmentSegment result €m 572572 – importantimportant synergies.synergies. Increased pprorofi tability meant EBITDAEBITDA 1) 8 Vision €m€m 2,6012,601 81.981.9 thatthat a sound operatingoperating proprofi t was earned again,again, CVACVA 34 Annual review€m – 198198 71.471.4 SegmentSegment capital expenditureexpenditure €m€m 2,0472,047 7.97.9 inin spite of non-recurringnon-recurring expenses.expenses. Employees as of36 31.12.31.1 2. Lufthansanumbernumb shareer 57,157 – 1.61.6 1) BeforeBefore profi t/loss40 transfertrans Reportfer fromfrom ofother the shareholders. Supervisory Board 42 Corporate Governance LogisticsLogistics 20102010 ChangeChange LogisticsLogistics TheThe earningsearnings turnaroundturnaround was even in % moremore pronounced in the LogisticsLogistics segment.segment. 8768 RevenueRevenue 45 Group management€m 2,7952,795 report43.343.3 Lufthansa CargoCargo benefi ted particularly from the OperatingO result of whichwhich externalexternal revenuerevenue €m€m 2,7702,770 43.743.7 globalglobal economic recovery and the boom in OperatingOperating result €m€m 310310 – ini EUR m Adjusted operatingoperating marginmargin % 11.4 19.4 ptspts German exports. The measures taken in prior SegmentSegment 149 result Consolidated€m€m fi nancial330 statements– yearsyears to safeguardsafeguard earningsearnings continued to have EBITDAEBITDA €m 445445 – a strongstrong effect.effect. FollowingFollowing an operatingoperating loss CVACVA €m 233 SegmentSegment capital expenditureexpenditure €m 2121 – 16.016.0 inin the previous year, Lufthansa CargoCargo reported Employees 230 as of 31.12.31.1 2. Furthernumbernu minformationber 4,5174,517 0.60.6 recordrecord profi ts in 2010. 230 Ten-year overview MROMRO 234 Glossary 2010 ChangeChange MROMRO Lufthansa Technik is a late-cyclelate-cycle playerplayer in % and so suffered from still hesitant demand in 1,6251 236 Credits/contact RevenueRevenue €m€m 4,0184,018 1.41.4 thethe MROMRO market in 2010.2010. Thanks to greatergreater pro-pro- Financial calendar 2011/2012 FreeF cash fl ow ofof which external revenue €m€m 2,3732,373 3.33.3 ductionduction fl exibilityexibility and a broader productproduct portfolioportfolio OperatingOperating result €m 268268 – 15.2 ini EUR m Adjusted operating margin % 7.47.4 – 0.9 pts itit was neverthelessnevertheless ableable to continuecontinue itsits growthgrowth SegmentSegment result €m 319319 – 3.6 pathpath and increase revenue. LufthansaLufthansa Technik EBITDAEBITDA €m 412412 – 5.55.5 againagain generatedgenerated a strongstrong operatingoperating proprofi t, but CVACVA €m€m 172 4.94.9 Segment capital expenditureexpenditure €m€m 6767 – 44.6 as expected,expected, itit was belowbelow thethe recordrecord set thethe Employees as of 31.12.31.12. numbernumber 20,15920,159 1.81.8 previousprevious year.year. IT ServicesServices 20102010 ChangeChange IT ServicesServices Lufthansa SystemsSystems offers IT solu-solu- in % tionstions forfor the airline industryindustry and, despite the still 717 RevenueRevenue €m 595595 – 1.7 difdiffi cult environment for the sector,sector, was able to CashC value added ofof whichwhich externalexternal revenuerevenue €m 232232 – 4.94.9 win newnew customerscustomers andand oorders.rders. RevenueRevenue aandnd OperatingOperating resultresult €m€m 1010 – 37.537.5 ini EUR m AdjustedAdjusted operatingoperating marginmargin % 1.81.8 –1.0–1.0 pts earningsearnings nevertheless remain under pressure.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Magisterarbeit / Master's Thesis
    MAGISTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Magisterarbeit / Title of the Master‘s Thesis Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Krisenkommunikation Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Flugzeugunglücks der Lufthansa-Tochter Germanwings am 24. März 2015 verfasst von / submitted by Raffaela ECKEL, Bakk. phil. angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, 2016 / Vienna, 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: A 066 841 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sabine Einwiller Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit an Eides statt, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Die aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommenen Gedanken sind als solche kenntlich ge- macht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form keiner anderen Prü- fungsbehörde vorgelegt und auch noch nicht veröffentlicht. Wien, August 2016 Raffaela Eckel Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einführung und Problemstellung ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Theoretische Hinführung: Beitrag der Wissenschaft zu einer gelungenen Krisenkommunikation.................................................................................................... 2 1.2
    [Show full text]
  • 246429 Master S Thesis___Ro
    Link to Microsoft Excel-Model In order to gain a better understanding of the following analysis and valuation, it is recommended to consider the original excel model, which has been built in a self-explanatory manner and can be found via the following link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/csj7ii75mvzcng7/Valuation of LHA - Master Thesis.xlsx?dl=0 While the main findings and explanations can be found in the text, you are welcome to contact me via e-mail with any questions or if problems with opening the file occur: [email protected] _______________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract The ultimate goal of this report is to provide the marginal investor with a thorough strategic as well as financial analysis of Deutsche Lufthansa AG leading towards a recommendation whether to buy, sell or hold the company's stock on 30.12.2016. Included in this analysis is an assessment of the credibility of current rumors about Lufthansa's potential engagement in M&A activity with Air Berlin. As consolidation is generally anticipated within the European airline industry, an informed assessment of the rumors' credibility is of relevance for the marginal investor. The applied DCF-valuation model derives at an estimate of 18,41€ for Deutsche Lufthansa AG's fair share price. As the stock is trading for 12,27€ on the valuation date, this report suggests that the market undervalues Lufthansa's stock. The additional constructions of a best and worst case scenario provide a potential range of share prices resembling possible deviations in estimated future growth rates of ASKs, load factors, unit yields, fuel and staff costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Data on Sustainability Within the Lufthansa Group Issue 2012 Www
    Issue 2012 Balance Key data on sustainability within the Lufthansa Group www.lufthansa.com/responsibility You will fi nd further information on sustainability within the Lufthansa Group at: www.lufthansa.com/responsibility Order your copy of our Annual Report 2011 at: www.lufthansa.com/investor-relations The new Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental The new Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental is the advanced version of one of the world’s most successful commercial aircraft. In close cooperation with Lufthansa, Boeing has developed an aircraft that is optimized not only in terms of com- fort but also in all dimensions of climate and environmental responsibility. The fully redesigned wings, extensive use of weight-reducing materials and innova- tive engine technology ensure that this aircraft’s eco-effi ciency has again been improved signifi cantly in comparison with its predecessor: greater fuel effi - ciency, lower emissions and signifi cant noise reductions (also see page 27). The “Queen of the Skies,” as many Jumbo enthusiasts call the “Dash Eight,” offers an exceptional travel experience in all classes of service, especially in the exclusive First Class and the entirely new Business Class. In this way, environmental effi ciency and the highest levels of travel comfort are brought into harmony. Lufthansa has ordered 20 aircraft of this type. Editorial information Published by Deutsche Lufthansa AG Lufthansa Group Communications, FRA CI Senior Vice President: Klaus Walther Concept, text and editors Media Relations Lufthansa Group, FRA CI/G Director: Christoph Meier Bernhard Jung Claudia Walther in cooperation with various departments and Petra Menke Redaktionsbüro Design and production organic Marken-Kommunikation GmbH Copy deadline 18 May 2012 Photo credits Jens Görlich/MO CGI (cover, page 5, 7, 35, 85) SWISS (page 12) Brussels Airlines (page 13) Reto Hoffmann (page 24) AeroLogic (page 29) Fraport AG/Stefan Rebscher (page 43) Werner Hennies (page 44) Ulf Büschleb (page 68 top) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015
    Consistently safeguarding the future Annual Report 2015 Lufthansa Group The Lufthansa Group is the world’s leading aviation group. Its portfolio of companies consists of hub airlines, point-to-point airlines and aviation service companies. Its combination of business segments makes the Lufthansa Group a globally unique aviation group whose integrated value chain not only offers financial synergies but also puts it in a superior position over its competitors in terms of know-how. Key figures Lufthansa Group 2015 2014 Change in % Revenue and result Total revenue €m 32,056 30,011 6.8 of which traffic revenue €m 25,322 24,388 3.8 EBIT1) €m 1,676 1,000 67.6 Adjusted EBIT €m 1,817 1,171 55.2 EBITDA1) €m 3,395 2,530 34.2 Net profit / loss €m 1,698 55 2,987.3 Key balance sheet and cash flow statement figures Total assets €m 32,462 30,474 6.5 Equity ratio % 18.0 13.2 4.8 pts Net indebtedness €m 3,347 3,418 – 2.1 Cash flow from operating activities €m 3,393 1,977 71.6 Capital expenditure (gross) €m 2,569 2,777 – 7.5 Key profitability and value creation figures EBIT margin % 5.2 3.3 1.9 pts Adjusted EBIT margin % 5.7 3.9 1.8 pts EBITDA margin 1) % 10.6 8.4 2.2 pts EACC €m 323 – 223 ROCE % 7.7 4.6 3.1 pts Lufthansa share Share price at year-end € 14.57 13.83 5.3 Earnings per share € 3.67 0.12 2,958.3 Proposed dividend per share € 0.50 – Traffic figures 2) Passengers thousands 107,679 105,991 1.6 Freight and mail thousand tonnes 1,864 1,924 – 3.1 Passenger load factor % 80.4 80.1 0.3 pts Cargo load factor % 66.3 69.9 – 3.6 pts Flights number 1,003,660 1,001,961 0.2 Employees Average number of employees number 119,559 118,973 0.5 Employees as of 31.12.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Framework
    Curriculum Framework Education for Sustainable A contribution to the UNESCO Global Action Programme Development »Education for Sustainable Development« KMK / BMZ – Curriculum Framework Curriculum – BMZ / KMK Development Sustainable for Education ISBN 978-3-06-230062-2 ,!7ID0G2-daagcc! _218GW_9783062300622 U1+U4_SIV Benutzerdefiniert V 28.11.16 12:14 Curriculum Framework Education for Sustainable Development 2nd updated and extended edition, 2016 edited by Jörg-Robert Schreiber and Hannes Siege A contribution to the Global Action Programme Education for Sustainable Development Result of the joint project of the Standing Conference of the German Ministers of Education and Culture (KMK) and the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) Imprint On behalf of: KMK (Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs) www.kmk.org, E-Mail: [email protected] Taubenstraße 10, D-10117 Berlin Postfach 11 03 42, D-10833 Berlin phone number: +49 (0) 30 254 18-499 Fax +49 (0) 30 254 18-450 BMZ (German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development) www.bmz.de, E-Mail: [email protected] Work location Bonn Postfach 12 03 22, D-53045 Bonn phone number: +49 (0) 228 99 535-0 Fax +49 (0) 228 99 535-2500 Work location Berlin Stresemannstraße 94, D-10963 Berlin phone number: +49 (0) 30 18 535-0 Fax +49 (0) 30 18 535-2501 Executed by: ENGAGEMENT GLOBAL gGmbH Service für Entwicklungsinitiativen Tulpenfeld 7, D-53113 Bonn phone number: +49 (0) 228 20717-0 Fax +49 (0) 228 20717-150 www.engagement-global.de
    [Show full text]
  • As a Dispositif: Towards a Critical Ontology of Policy and Power
    "Tea~h First" as a Dispositif: Towards a critical ontology of policy and power Patrick L.J. Bailey veL Institute of Education, London PhD Thesis June 2015 . 1 Declaration I, Patrick Bailey, hereby declare that, except where explicit attribution is made, the work presented in this thesis is entirely my own. Word Count 99,854 words Copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the proper acknowledgement of the author. 2 Abstract This thesis is a study of power. More specifically, it is a study of some of the myriad forms and operations of power which animate and condition the present, and which can be observed in the governing of education policy. A material post-structural approach to policy sociology is developed and then deployed in exploring the ontology of the education state and the teacher. The thesis puts to work the 'methods' and 'sensibilities' of Foucauldian genealogy and critical ethnography, and in doing so attends to some of the history of power and its insinuations in the governing and administering of education. Drawing on Michel Foucault's methodological and analytical concept of the dispositif, education policy is conceptualised as an historical and contingent formation of material objects, discourses and practices - a policy dispositij. At the same time, dispositifis applied as an analytical device for investigating the 'micro-physics' and 'immanence' of power, or the different ways in which power operates in minute and molecular ways in individual and heterogeneous encounters. Dispositifis also applied as a critical tool for exposing the ways in which the present is conditioned and fabricated within, and by, multiple forces of enablement and constraint.
    [Show full text]
  • In Focus - 2011
    IN FOCUS - 2011 AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF STAR ALLIANCE PRODUCTS AND BENEFITS THE WAY THE EARTH CONNECTS 2 A snapshot of the 26 Star Alliance members 3 Total revenue ($US) $168.1 billion Airports served 1,300 Annual passengers 659.6 million Fleet 4,377 Daily departures 20,813 Lounges More than 980 Number of Employees 412,762 Countries served 189 STAR ALLIANCE FLEET NUMBER Of MAJOR HUB MEMBER CARRIERS SIZE EMPLOYEES AIRPORTS Adria Airways (JP) 14 452 Ljubljana Aegean Airlines (A3) 29 2,200 Athens, Thessaloniki, Heraklion, Rhodes, Larnaca Air Canada (AC) 352 26,000 Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary Air China (CA) 282 24,459 Beijing, Chengdu, Shanghai Air New Zealand (NZ) 102 10,800 Auckland, Los Angeles, Hong Kong ANA (NH) 222 33,183 Tokyo, Haneda, Osaka Asiana Airlines (OZ) 71 9,041 Seoul Incheon, Seoul Gimpo Austrian (OS) 81 6,000 Vienna Blue1 (KF) 9 350 Helsinki British Midland International (BD) 60 3,811 London Heathrow Brussels Airlines (SN) 49 3,300 Brussels Croatia Airlines (OU) 13 1,095 Zagreb EGYPTAIR (MS) 75 7,500 Cairo Ethiopian Airlines (ET) 48 5,635 Addis Ababa, Lome LOT Polish Airlines (LO) 54 2,887 Warsaw Lufthansa (LH) 419 37,689 Frankfurt, Munich Scandinavian Airlines (SK) 136 12,883 Copenhagen, Oslo, Stockholm Singapore Airlines (SQ) 105 13,588 Singapore Changi South African Airways (SA) 55 9,223 Johannesburg SWISS (LX) 89 7,641 Zurich, Geneva, Basel TAM (JJ) 154 29,000 São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasilia TAP Portugal (TP) 71 7,055 Lisbon, Porto Thai Airways Intl (TG) 89 24,563 Bangkok, Chiang Mai, Phuket, Hat Yai Turkish
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Teach for All. Investing In
    SESSION SUMMARY: THE CASE FOR SUPPORT One important element to bolster our ​The purpose of this session is to seek fundraising strategy is how we make your feedback to inform the next revision. the case for an investment in Teach We’re particularly interested in your For All. We’re sharing a draft feedback on the following questions: presentation that we’ve recently • Does our story come across clearly? revised based on feedback received. • Is it compelling? We are looking forward to the Board’s • Are there parts of this presentation further feedback. While we wouldn’t that are working well? envision using this presentation within • Is this too long or not detailed enough? meetings, the flow is similar to what we talk through with people, and we • What would you like to see that you would envision using slides such as aren’t seeing here? these as follow up. • How would you suggest improving this? We have also included an optional read that describes the global operations and initiatives we raise money for. 1 Investing in the Rising Generation 2 EVERY CHILD HAS THE POTENTIAL TO SHAPE A BRIGHTER FUTURE But around the world children don’t have the education, support, and opportunity they need to fulfill that potential And when millions of children aren’t learning, the results are devastating — perpetuating poverty, dividing societies, and weakening economies. 3 THERE’S NO SINGLE SOLUTION TO SUCH A COMPLEX PROBLEM To change the status quo for children in marginalized communities we have to address their needs both within and beyond the classroom
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidation in Turbulent Times
    Consolidation in turbulent times Lufthansa carried a total of 70.5 million passengers last year and was ranked number one by IATA (International Air Transport Association) for having carried the most number of passengers on international scheduled routes, leaving number two Air France lagging some 20 per cent behind. The airline also made headlines when it made a the team’s achievement ‘on the playing field' and I’m number of strategic moves last year, such as confident they will rise to the challenge when the establishing Lufthansa Italia, a market-specific chips are down. network in Italy; buying a stake in American carrier JetBlue Airways; and exercising an option on bmi, In addition to our people are our robust financial giving it the second most number of slots after base and our expertise and experience in dealing British Airways at London Heathrow, Europe’s with difficult situations. busiest airport. A major contribution to the stabilisation of the It also took a leading role in consolidating in Europe group’s profitability as a whole in this environment by taking over Swiss International Air Lines and is made by our portfolio of business segments. Austrian Airlines (subject to regulatory approval by Thanks to the different cycles in the individual the European Commission), and acquiring a 45 per segments, they decisively support the sustainable cent stake in Brussels Airlines with an option to development of the group. Equally decisive, acquire the remaining 55 per cent of the company in however, is the fact that all business segments in 2011 (again, subject to regulatory approval by the themselves have a significantly lower volatility European Commission).
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: a Comparison Between Barcelona and Malpensa De-Hubbing
    Case Study: A comparison between Barcelona and Malpensa de-hubbing. Andrea Giuricin PhD. Student In “Istituzioni, Amministrazioni e Politiche Regionali” three years scholarship, jointly organised by Pavia University, Catholic University, Milan University and Politecnico di Milano, Specialization in Public Economy and Transport Economics. Lecturer in Public Finance, Faculty of Economics, University Milano Bicocca. Fellow at Bruno Leoni Institute and author of the book “Alitalia, the never-ending privatization” and other publications on transportation's sector. Abstract In April 2008, Alitalia implemented a new industrial Plan, which aimed at reducing cost and redefining the network. These applied on a new strategy of Alitalia from a multi-hub system to one- hub system. SEA, Milan airport’s operator, decided to react in two directions. First, changing strategy from hub&spoke to a point to point network model. Second, lobbing national Government to liberalize bilateral agreements. This paper examines these two strategies and the results that were achieved. The Spanish flagship carrier Iberia made an important de-hubbing in the second airport of Spain, Barcelona. In these two cases, there are some similarities but also differences. Malpensa and Barcelona made agreement with low cost carrier Easyjet to substitute national flagship carriers. They have a similar competition by a secondary airport in the catchment area, where main airline is Ryanair. However airport operator is managed by AENA, a state-owned company, while Malpensa is managed by SEA, controlled by municipality of Milan. This paper analysed data from AENA and internal data from SEA. This availability allows a statistical comparison between the different reaction’s strategies.
    [Show full text]