1St Interim Report January – March 2009 ­­­Lufthansa ­­­Group Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1St Interim Report January – March 2009 ­­­Lufthansa ­­­Group Overview 1st Interim Report January – March 2009 ­­­Lufthansa­­­ Group overview Key figures Jan. – March Jan. – March Change 2009 2008 3) in % Revenue and result Revenue €m 5,015 5,588 – 10.3 - of which traffic revenue €m 3,813 4,467 – 14.6 Operating result €m – 44 172 EBIT €m – 205 94 EBITDA €m 255 452 – 43.6 Net profit/loss for the period €m – 256 44 Key balance sheet and cash flow statement figures Total assets €m 24,468 22,790 7.4 Equity ratio % 26.1 28.7 – 2.6 pts Net liquidity 1) €m 46 888 – 94.8 Cash flow from operating activities €m 708 741 – 4.5 Capital expenditure €m 664 808 – 17.8 Key profitability and value creation figures Adjusted operating margin 2) % – 0.6 3.2 – 3.8 pts EBITDA margin % 5.1 8.1 – 3.0 pts The Lufthansa share Share price at the balance sheet day € 8.17 17.13 – 52.3 Earnings per share € – 0.56 0.10 Traffic figures Passengers thousands 15,033 15,994 – 6.0 thousand Freight/mail tonnes 375 485 – 22.7 Passenger load factor % 74.0 77.2 – 3.2 pts Cargo load factor % 54.9 66.5 – 11.5 pts Available tonne-kilometres millions 7,887 8,155 – 3.3 Revenue tonne-kilometres millions 5,155 5,872 – 12.2 Overall load factor % 65.4 72.0 – 6.6 pts Number of flights 187,738 195,677 – 4.1 Employees Employees as of 31.3. number 106,840 106,307 0.5 1) Long-term securities serving as liquidity reserves and cashable at short notice have been included in the calculation of net liquidity. 2) Ratio for comparability with other airlines: (operating result + reversals of provisions) /revenue. 3) Last year’s figures have been adjusted in line with IFRIC 13. The interim report at 31 March 2009 was prepared in accordance with the rules of IAS 34, taking into account the stand- ards applicable since 1 January 2009. More information on changes to the accounting standards can be found in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements on page 30. Date of disclosure: 30 April 2009. Contents 1 To our shareholders 30 Notes to the financial statements 3 Interim management report 3 6 Credits/Contact 24 Interim financial statements Financial calendar 2009/2010 To our shareholders I Interim management report I Interim financial statements I Notes to the financial statements Letter from the Executive Board Dear Shareholders, The global recession and ensuing decline in demand have also these difficult times. We are adjusting where necessary and are left their mark on Lufthansa. In the first quarter the Group was not ready to act when opportunity knocks. In February Lufthansa Italia able to achieve a balanced result, reporting an operating loss of had a successful launch in Milan. EUR 44m. This is the same level as in 2005 and 2006, but at that time we were at a much better point on the economic cycle. The consolidation of the European aviation sector is progressing, and we are continuing to advance our ongoing transactions. The In the years of a strong economy we deliberately deployed our takeover offer to Austrian Airlines shareholders of EUR 4.49 per thrust and so can now maintain our course and continue our share runs until 11 May. We will be filing the documentation for the flight safely. This is thanks to the achieved operating flexibility and anti-trust review with Brussels at the beginning of May. Lufthansa’s sound and very robust financial profile. Even in these A decision in the anti-trust review procedure for the takeover of circumstances we have therefore been able to raise EUR 1.5bn in the British airline bmi is not expected before 14 May 2009. The new funding via the successful issue of private placements and a planned takeover of Brussels Airlines is also currently the sub- bond in the first quarter. ject of a detailed review by the European Commission. However, Lufthansa and Brussels Airlines have already extended the scope But this year is full of challenges, even for the Lufthansa crane. In of their cooperation under existing agreements from the start of the the traditionally weak first quarter the companies in the Passenger summer flight timetable. Airline Group and Lufthansa Cargo in particular registered a weak demand, and revenue and operating result for both segments are Lufthansa’s development towards a group system of independ- therefore well below last year’s strong figures. Due to this develop- ent airlines is reflected in the new allocation of responsibilities for ment, both companies carried out the necessary adjustments to the Executive Board, which the Supervisory Board approved on capacity under predefined phased plans as well as implementing 23 April. At the same time Christoph Franz was appointed to the extensive other cost-cutting measures. Executive Board of Deutsche Lufthansa AG and as its Deputy Chairman with effect from 1 June 2009. The MRO segment was able to increase revenue, against the general trend for its sector, but its operating result was below last Just like the pilots on board our aircraft, the Lufthansa Group with year’s. IT Services could not match last year’s figures for revenue its experienced management team and motivated staff has all the or operating result. In contrast, the Catering segment improved its instruments at its fingertips to fly through the current turbulence operating result despite declining revenue due to a positive one-off safely. Even if we have to fly around the odd storm, our general effect. course remains the same: to stay true to our performance and quality promise and to act according to the principle of sustainable Dear shareholders, even if current conditions are turbulent, we are value creation. convinced of the long-term growth potential of the aviation market. In order to be a part of this, Lufthansa is not neglecting either the Thank you very much for your confidence. development of its products or that of its route network, even in Wolfgang Mayrhuber Stephan Gemkow Stefan Lauer Chairman of the Executive Member of the Executive Board Member of the Executive Board Board and CEO Chief Financial Officer Chief Officer Aviation Services and Human Resources Lufthansa 1st Interim Report January–March 2009 1 Share The stock market faithfully reflected the continuing world eco- nomic crisis in the first three months of the 2009 financial year. Further downward adjustments to economic forecasts particularly depressed the general mood. Reserved statements by many companies on their expected results for the financial year 2009 contributed to the poor stock market performance, as did the a sustained effect on the share price. The Lufthansa share could continuing negative effects of the crisis on credit markets. The oil not extricate itself from the negative overall trend. Due to its sound price, which was still low compared with the previous year, was not fundamentals and the conviction that Lufthansa will emerge as one able to provide tangible relief. All the leading indices reflected this, of the winners from the crisis, the majority of analysts still recom- registering sharp falls in some cases. The German share index mend to buy or hold the Lufthansa share. The average target price DAX reported a decline of more than 15 per cent in the reporting from all analysts is well above the current price at EUR 11.65. period to 4,085 points. Shareholder structure by nationality (as of 31 March 2009) in % Lufthansa’s share price trend (indexed on 31 December 2008) compared with the DAX and competitors France 1.3 in % UK 2.4 Other 2.1 120 DAX USA 6.0 Lufthansa British Airways Luxembourg 9.3 Air France-KLM 100 Germany 78.9 80 As of 31 March 2009 a total of 78.9 per cent of Lufthansa’s share capital was held by German investors. Luxembourg came 60 in second place with 9.3 per cent, before the USA with 6.0 per 31.12. 29.1. 28.2. 31.3. cent. AXA Group was by far the largest single shareholder with 2008 2009 10.56 per cent. Including the stakes held by Dresdner Bank AG and Süddeutsche Industrie-Beteiligungs-GmbH, Commerz- In this environment the Lufthansa share price sank by 27 per cent bank AG now holds 3.06 per cent of Lufthansa’s share capital. up to 31 March, dropping to EUR 8.17. Its development was initial- 68.2 per cent of shares were owned by institutional investors ly in parallel with the DAX, but from the end of February the share, and the remaining 31.8 per cent were therefore held by private as those of its competitors, could no longer escape the adverse individuals. The free float came to 100 per cent. Details of the sentiment toward the industry. In this environment not even positive shareholder structure are updated regularly and published on company news, such as the still positive outlook, was able to have our website at www.lufthansa.com/investor-relations. 2 Lufthansa 1st Interim Report January–March 2009 To our shareholders I Interim management report I Interim financial statements I Notes to the financial statements Economic environment and sector performance The Euro-Zone, including Germany, continues to face recession. Capital expenditure is weak, as the impetus from export-driven demand is absent. Private consumption is ebbing away here too, Interim management report burdened by falling asset prices and the distinctly gloomier state of the labour market. Economic environment and sector developments The global economy is currently going through the worst depres- At the beginning of the year the euro was worth USD 1.40.
Recommended publications
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidation in Turbulent Times
    Consolidation in turbulent times Lufthansa carried a total of 70.5 million passengers last year and was ranked number one by IATA (International Air Transport Association) for having carried the most number of passengers on international scheduled routes, leaving number two Air France lagging some 20 per cent behind. The airline also made headlines when it made a the team’s achievement ‘on the playing field' and I’m number of strategic moves last year, such as confident they will rise to the challenge when the establishing Lufthansa Italia, a market-specific chips are down. network in Italy; buying a stake in American carrier JetBlue Airways; and exercising an option on bmi, In addition to our people are our robust financial giving it the second most number of slots after base and our expertise and experience in dealing British Airways at London Heathrow, Europe’s with difficult situations. busiest airport. A major contribution to the stabilisation of the It also took a leading role in consolidating in Europe group’s profitability as a whole in this environment by taking over Swiss International Air Lines and is made by our portfolio of business segments. Austrian Airlines (subject to regulatory approval by Thanks to the different cycles in the individual the European Commission), and acquiring a 45 per segments, they decisively support the sustainable cent stake in Brussels Airlines with an option to development of the group. Equally decisive, acquire the remaining 55 per cent of the company in however, is the fact that all business segments in 2011 (again, subject to regulatory approval by the themselves have a significantly lower volatility European Commission).
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: a Comparison Between Barcelona and Malpensa De-Hubbing
    Case Study: A comparison between Barcelona and Malpensa de-hubbing. Andrea Giuricin PhD. Student In “Istituzioni, Amministrazioni e Politiche Regionali” three years scholarship, jointly organised by Pavia University, Catholic University, Milan University and Politecnico di Milano, Specialization in Public Economy and Transport Economics. Lecturer in Public Finance, Faculty of Economics, University Milano Bicocca. Fellow at Bruno Leoni Institute and author of the book “Alitalia, the never-ending privatization” and other publications on transportation's sector. Abstract In April 2008, Alitalia implemented a new industrial Plan, which aimed at reducing cost and redefining the network. These applied on a new strategy of Alitalia from a multi-hub system to one- hub system. SEA, Milan airport’s operator, decided to react in two directions. First, changing strategy from hub&spoke to a point to point network model. Second, lobbing national Government to liberalize bilateral agreements. This paper examines these two strategies and the results that were achieved. The Spanish flagship carrier Iberia made an important de-hubbing in the second airport of Spain, Barcelona. In these two cases, there are some similarities but also differences. Malpensa and Barcelona made agreement with low cost carrier Easyjet to substitute national flagship carriers. They have a similar competition by a secondary airport in the catchment area, where main airline is Ryanair. However airport operator is managed by AENA, a state-owned company, while Malpensa is managed by SEA, controlled by municipality of Milan. This paper analysed data from AENA and internal data from SEA. This availability allows a statistical comparison between the different reaction’s strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Elenco Codici IATA Delle Compagnie Aeree
    Elenco codici IATA delle compagnie aeree. OGNI COMPAGNIA AEREA HA UN CODICE IATA Un elenco dei codici ATA delle compagnie aeree è uno strumento fondamentale, per chi lavora in agenzia viaggi e nel settore del turismo in generale. Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree, costituito da due lettere, indica un determinato vettore aereo. Ad esempio, è utilizzato nelle prime due lettere del codice di un volo: – AZ 502, AZ indica la compagnia aerea Alitalia. – FR 4844, FR indica la compagnia aerea Ryanair -AF 567, AF, indica la compagnia aerea Air France Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree è utilizzato per scopi commerciali, nell’ambito di una prenotazione, orari (ad esempio nel tabellone partenza e arrivi in aeroporto) , biglietti , tariffe , lettere di trasporto aereo e bagagli Di seguito, per una visione di insieme, una lista in ordine alfabetico dei codici di molte compagnie aeree di tutto il mondo. Per una ricerca più rapida e precisa, potete cliccare il tasto Ctrl ed f contemporaneamente. Se non doveste trovare un codice IATA di una compagnia aerea in questa lista, ecco la pagina del sito dell’organizzazione Di seguito le sigle iata degli aeroporti di tutto il mondo ELENCO CODICI IATA COMPAGNIE AEREE: 0A – Amber Air (Lituania) 0B – Blue Air (Romania) 0J – Jetclub (Svizzera) 1A – Amadeus Global Travel Distribution (Spagna) 1B – Abacus International (Singapore) 1C – Electronic Data Systems (Svizzera) 1D – Radixx Solutions International (USA) 1E – Travelsky Technology (Cina) 1F – INFINI Travel Information (Giappone) G – Galileo International
    [Show full text]
  • Management Report 2011
    Management Report 2011 Société anonyme with share capital of 300 219 278 euros Registered offi ces: 2, rue Robert Esnault-Pelterie, 75007 Paris Mailing address: 45, rue de Paris, 95747 Roissy CDG Cedex Paris Trade and Company Register: 552 043 002 1 Corporate governance 1 1.1 The Board of Directors 2 1.2 The Group Executive Committee 28 1.3 Share capital and shareholder structure 29 2 Activity 35 2.1 Highlights of the 2011 fi nancial year 36 2.2 Market and environment 38 2.3 Strategy 44 2.4 Passenger business 48 2.5 Cargo business 50 2.6 Maintenance business 52 2.7 Other businesses 53 2.8 Highlights of the beginning of the 2012 fi nancial year 53 2.9 Fleet 54 3 Risks and risk management 61 3.1 Risk management process 62 3.2 Risk factors and their management 63 3.3 Market risks and their management 71 4 Social and environmental data 77 4.1 Social data 78 4.2 Social indicators for the Group 88 4.3 Environmental data 96 4.4 Environmental indicators for the Group 103 5 Comments on the fi nancial statements 113 This Management Report is an unoffi cial translation of the French Rapport de Gestion and has been produced by Air France-KLM for the information and convenience of English-speaking readers. No assurances are given as to the accuracy or completeness of this translation, nor any responsibility assumed for any misstatement or omission that may be contained herein. In the event of any ambiguity or discrepancy between this unoffi cial translation and the French Rapport de Gestion, the French version shall prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Data compiled from Flightglobal ACAS database flightglobal.com/acas EXPLANATORY NOTES The data in this census covers all commercial jet- and requirements, put into storage, and so on, and when airliners that have been temporarily removed from an turboprop-powered transport aircraft in service or on flying hours for three consecutive months are reported airline’s fleet and returned to the state may not be firm order with the world’s airlines, excluding aircraft as zero. shown as being with the airline for which they operate. that carry fewer than 14 passengers, or the equivalent The exception is where the aircraft is undergoing Russian aircraft tend to spend a long time parked in cargo. maintenance, where it will remain classified as active. before being permanently retired – much longer than The tables are in two sections, both of which have Aircraft awaiting a conversion will be shown as parked. equivalent Western aircraft – so it can be difficult to been compiled by Flightglobal ACAS research officer The region is dictated by operator base and does not establish the exact status of the “available fleet” John Wilding using Flightglobal’s ACAS database. necessarily indicate the area of operation. Options and (parked aircraft that could be returned to operation). Section one records the fleets of the Western-built letters of intent (where a firm contract has not been For more information on airliner types see our two- airliners, and the second section records the fleets of signed) are not included. Orders by, and aircraft with, part World Airliners Directory (Flight International, 27 Russian/CIS-built types.
    [Show full text]
  • Enjoy Your Flight with Lufthansa Italia! Today, the First New Direct Flights from Naples to Milan Malpensa
    Naples, 1 April, 2009 Enjoy your flight with Lufthansa Italia! Today, the first new direct flights from Naples to Milan Malpensa As of 1 April, Lufthansa Italia launches domestic service from Naples, Rome and Bari to Milan Malpensa Today, Wednesday 1 April, the new Naples – Milan Malpensa route was inaugurated by Heike Birlenbach, Vice President of the Milan Division of Lufthansa Italia. The first domestic flight for Naples - LH 1864 - operated by Lufthansa Italia, the Group’s new Italian company, departed from Milan Malpensa at 5:25p.m. and, on the same route, a second flight, LH 1865, will depart from Naples at 7:45 p.m. and is scheduled to arrive in Milan at 9:20 p.m. Two scheduled flights from Naples: The morning flight - LH 1861 – will operate every day except Sunday and the evening flight - LH 1865 – will operate every day. The timetable was established in order to facilitate day trips for both destinations and was especially designed to accommodate business passengers. Lufthansa Italia selected Naples as one of the first domestic destinations in its network owing to the importance of the Campania capital both in terms of tourism and for the concentration of business interests. In addition to Naples, where Lufthansa will operate 13 flights a week, as of today Lufthansa will also operate 4 flights a day for Rome and one daily flight for Bari. “We are extremely proud to introduce the first Naples- Milan flight operated by Lufthansa Italia, a company which ably combines Lufthansa’s well known characteristics of reliability and punctuality with a touch of Italian flair” declared Heike Birlenbach, Vice President of the Milan Division of Lufthansa Italia .
    [Show full text]
  • Il Rilancio Dell'aeroporto Come Strumento Di Sviluppo Del Territorio
    IlIl rilanciorilancio delldell’’aeroportoaeroporto comecome strumentostrumento didi svilupposviluppo deldel territorioterritorio Audizione in commissione consiliare Torino – 22 Luglio 2009 Audizione associazione FlyTorino – 22 Luglio 2009 FlyTorino – Chi siamo FlyTorino si propone tre obiettivi principali: 1. Sensibilizzare i cittadini e le imprese piemontesi ad identificare l’aeroporto internazionale di TRN come scalo di riferimento. 2. Promuovere TRN come porta d’accesso preferenziale per i turisti italiani e stranieri verso Torino, il Piemonte e le Alpi Occidentali. 3. Attivare un dialogo costante con istituzioni, compagnie aeree ed operatori turistici per lo sviluppo e la crescita di TRN. Audizione associazione FlyTorino – 22 Luglio 2009 WWW.FLYTORINO.IT: Un mini-portale 188 soci ed oltre 2000 utenti registrati ai canali web Audizione associazione FlyTorino – 22 Luglio 2009 Il panorama low cost in Italia Torino è l’unica grande area metropolitana in Italia a non essersi ancora dotata di una base low cost/low fare. Ryanair Myair* Air Italy* Bergamo Bergamo Napoli Roma CIA Venezia Verona Pisa Bari Bologna Foggia easyJet Cagliari Milano MXP Alghero WindJet* Trapani Catania Pescara Blu Express* Palermo Roma FCO Forlì Audizione associazione FlyTorino – 22 Luglio 2009 Il panorama low cost in Europa Torino è l’unica grande area metropolitana in Italia (ed una tra le pochissime in Europa) a non essersi ancora dotata di una base low cost. EASYJET (18) Basilea East Midlands Lione Milano-Malpensa Belfast Edimburgo Liverpool Newcastle Berlino-Schönefeld
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of the Airline Industry
    Master's Degree programme in INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT Second Cycle (D.M. 270/2004) Final Thesis Economics of the Airline Industry The Alitalia bankruptcy: a review Supervisor Ch. Prof. Chiara Saccon Assistant supervisor Ch. Prof. Marco Vedovato Graduand Andrea Rizzetto Matriculation Number 865717 Academic Year 2016 / 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor Prof. Chiara Saccon of the Management Department at Ca’ Foscari - University of Venice. She consistently allowed this paper to be my own work, but steered me in the right direction whenever she thought I needed it. I would also like to thank the air transport industry expert Captain Fabio Cassan for the professional and continued support he gave me and for the preface he wrote to sign this dissertation. Finally, last but not least, I would like to thank my family, my girlfriend and my friends, without whose support it would not have been possible this one and a half years master’s degree experience. Acknowledgements Index Preface by Fabio Cassan I Introduction IV CHAPTER ONE — Air Transport industry overview 1 1. A long story short 2 2. A fast-growing industry 4 3. International Institutional and Regulatory Environment 7 3.1. The Chicago Convention 8 3.1.1. The Freedoms of the Air 9 3.2. Airline industry privatisation 10 3.2.1. United States vs. European Union: different perspective same goal 11 3.2.2. The Effects 12 4. Aviation Industry and the World Economy 15 CHAPTER TWO — Airline Economics, Costs and Revenues 18 1. The basic airline profit equation 19 2.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA (General Sales Agent): Cos’È E Cosa Fa
    Cosa e quali sono le Alleanze aeree? Oltre la metà del trasporto aereo mondiale è nelle mani delle compagnie aeree aderenti alle alleanze. Cosa sono le alleanze aeree e perchè sono nate? La necessità da parte del passeggero di raggiungere ogni parte del mondo e quella per i vettori aerei di ridurre i costi , pur offrendo un alto livello di sicurezza e servizi, hanno fatto si che le compagnie aeree hanno stipulato tra loro degli accordi. Questi accordi hanno dato origine a gruppi distinti di compagnie , le cosiddette Alleanze aeree. Quali sono i vantaggi delle alleanze aeree per le compagnie e i passeggeri? Strettamente correlato alle alleanze aeree vi sono i concetti di code sharing e slot aereo. I vettori aerei appartenenti alla stessa alleanza possono abbattere i costi condividendo le spese per: Vendita biglietteria Personale a terra e all’ufficio check-in Gestione infrastrutture Servizi catering a bordo Vantaggi passeggeri: Prezzi più bassi dei biglietti aerei Partenze più frequenti per raggiunggere una determinata destinazione Maggior numero di destinazioni raggiungibili bonus derivanti dai programmi di fedeltà.( ad esempio Millemiglia di Alitalia) *Le Alleanze aeree per il momento sono tre. Se vuoi vedere la lista aggiornata dei membri d ti consiglio di cliccare nei link subito sotto, ognuno è collegato al sito della rispettiva alleanza STAR Codice Vettore Aereo ALLIANCE IATA Paese (sede) Slovenia Adria JP Grecia Aegean A3 Canada Air Canada AC Cina Air China CA India Air India AI Nuova Zelanda Air New Zealand NZ Giappone ANA NH Corea
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008
    ANNUAL_REP_2008:00_ENTWURF_01 12.02.2026 15:37 Uhr Seite 1 Airport Research Air Transport and Air Transport Analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2008 EUROPEAN COMMISSION ANNUAL_REP_2008:00_ENTWURF_01 12.02.2026 15:37 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2008 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Air Transport and Airport Research May 2010 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Rainer Kiehne, Alexandra Leipold, Dr. Sven Maertens, Melanie Murphy, Dr. Peter Meincke, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Annual Report 2008 2010-05-05 Release: 3.6 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2008 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2008 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 3.6 Save date: 2010-05-05 Total pages: 245 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 0.03 2009-02-24 1st Draft Report 2008 0.07 2009-05-13 all Final Draft Report 2008 1.0 2009-06-17 Final Report 2008 1.1 2009-06-17 format items Final Report 2008 1.2 2009-06-19 new tables 2-15, 2-16 Final Report 2008 1.3 2009-06-30
    [Show full text]