2Nd Interim Report January – June 2011 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2Nd Interim Report January – June 2011 2 2nd Interim Report January – June 2011 2 Vision www.lufthansa.com www.lufthansa.com/investor-relations www.lufthansa.com/responsibility Lufthansa Group overview Key fi gures Lufthansa Group Credits Contact Financial calendar Jan. – June Jan. – June Change April – June April – June Change Published by Frank Hülsmann 2011 2011 2010 in % 2011 2010 in % Deutsche Lufthansa AG Head of Investor Relations 27 Oct. Press Conference and Analysts’ Von-Gablenz-Str. 2– 6 + 49 69 696 – 28001 Revenue and result Conference on interim result 50679 Cologne Total revenue €m 14,063 12,625 11.4 7,624 6,867 11.0 Johannes Hildenbrock January – September 2011 Germany of which traffi c revenue €m 11,597 10,203 13.7 6,373 5,627 13.3 + 49 69 696 – 28003 2012 Operating result €m 3 – 171 230 159 44.7 Entered in the Commercial Register of Gregor Schleussner EBIT €m – 128 64 450 370 21.6 Cologne District Court under HRB 2168 15 March Press Conference and Analysts’ + 49 69 696 – 28012 EBITDA €m 739 876 – 15.6 880 777 13.3 Conference on 2011 results Editorial staff Net profi t / loss for the period €m – 206 – 104 – 98.1 301 194 55.2 Deutsche Lufthansa AG Frank Hülsmann (Editor) 3 May Release of Interim Report Investor Relations Key balance sheet and cash fl ow statement fi gures Claudio Rizzo January – March 2012 LAC, Airportring Total assets €m 29,517 29,532 – 0.1 – – – Christian Schmidt 60546 Frankfurt am Main 8 May Annual General Meeting Equity ratio % 26.5 24.3 2.2 pts – – – Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Germany in Cologne Net indebtedness €m 1,427 1,754 – 18.6 – – – Investor Relations Phone: + 49 69 696 – 28008 2 Aug. Release of Interim Report Cash fl ow from operating activities €m 1,740 1,420 22.5 961 856 12.3 Fax: + 49 69 696 – 90990 Concept, design and realisation January – June 2012 Capital expenditure (gross) €m 1,437 974 47.5 693 440 57.5 E-mail: [email protected] HGB Hamburger Geschäftsberichte GmbH 31 Oct. Press Conference and Analysts’ Key profi tability and value creation fi gures & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany The Lufthansa 2nd Interim Report is a Conference on interim result Adjusted operating margin 1) % 0.4 – 1.0 1.4 pts 3.5 2.7 0.8 pts translation of the original German Lufthansa Translation by January – September 2012 EBITDA margin % 5.3 6.9 – 1.6 pts 11.5 11.3 0.2 pts Zwischenbericht 2/2011. Please note that EnglishBusiness GbR, only the German version is legally binding. Lufthansa share Hamburg, Germany You can order the Annual and Interim Reports Share price at the quarter-end € 15.03 11.39 32.0 – – – Printed by in German or English via our website – Earnings per share € – 0.45 – 0.23 – 95.7 0.66 0.42 57.1 Broermann Druck + Medien GmbH, www.lufthansa.com/investor-relations – or Troisdorf, Germany from the address above. Traffi c fi gures Printed on Circlesilk Premium White Passengers thousands 50,234 45,627 10.1 28,147 24,983 12.7 (100 per cent recycled paper bearing the The latest fi nancial information on the internet: Passenger load factor % 75.4 77.3 – 1.9 pts 78.0 79.3 – 1.3 pts EU Ecolabel, registration number FR/011/003) www.lufthansa.com/investor-relations thousand Freight and mail tonnes 1,070 939 13.9 542 493 9.8 Printed in Germany Cargo load factor % 66.6 68.9 – 2.3 pts 65.9 69.1 – 3.2 pts ISSN 1616-0258 Available tonne-kilometres millions 20,624 18,558 11.1 10,812 9,719 11.2 Revenue tonne-kilometres millions 14,752 13,666 7.9 7,863 7,290 7.9 Overall load factor % 71.5 73.6 – 2.1 pts 72.7 75.0 – 2.3 pts Flights number 557,760 526,934 5.9 291,299 271,997 7.1 Employees Employees as of 30.6. number 118,766 116,844 1.6 118,766 116,844 1.6 1) Performance indicator to enable comparison with other airlines: (operating result + write-backs of provisions) / revenue. Date of publication: 28 July 2011. Contents Disclaimer in respect of forward-looking statements Information published in the 2nd Interim Report 2011, with regard to the future development of the Lufthansa Group and its subsidiaries consists purely 1 To our shareholders 35 Further information of forecasts and assessments and not of defi nitive historical facts. Its purpose is exclusively informational identifi ed by the use of such cautionary terms as “believe”, “expect”, “forecast”, “intend”, “project”, “plan”, “estimate” or “intend”. These forward-looking statements are based on all discernible 3 Interim management report 37 Credits/Contact information, facts and expectations available at the time. They can, therefore, only claim validity up to the date of their publication. 24 Interim fi nancial statements Financial calendar 2011/2012 Since forward-looking statements are by their nature subject to uncertainties and imponderable risk factors – such as changes in underlying economic conditions – and rest on assumptions that may not or divergently occur, it is possible that the Group’s actual results and development may differ materially from those implied by the forecasts. Lufthansa makes a point of checking and updating the information it publishes. It cannot, however, assume any obligation to adapt forward-looking statements to accommodate events or developments that may occur at some later date. Accordingly, it neither expressly nor conclusively accepts liability, nor gives any guarantee, for the actuality, accuracy and completeness of this data and information. To our shareholders | Interim management report | Interim financial statements | Further information Letter from the Executive Board Lufthansa Group overview Key fi gures Lufthansa Group LadiesCredits and gentlemen, Contact Financial calendar Jan. – June Jan. – June Change April – June April – June Change Published by Frank Hülsmann 2011 2011 2010 in % 2011 2010 in % Deutsche Lufthansa AG Head of Investor Relations While the outlook was thoroughly positive for the global economy The Logistics segment succeeded 27 Oct. in Press finishing Conference the first and six Analysts’ months Von-Gablenz-Str. 2– 6 + 49 69 696 – 28001 Revenue and result and the aviation industry at the beginning of 2011, prospects have of 2011 with operating profits only slightlyConference below on the interim previous result year’s 50679 Cologne Total revenue €m 14,063 12,625 11.4 7,624 6,867 11.0 become much more differentiated since the outbreakJohannes of political Hildenbrock record result. Lufthansa Technik alsoJanuary posted – aSeptember clear profit 2011 for the Germany of which traffi c revenue €m 11,597 10,203 13.7 6,373 5,627 13.3 unrest in North Africa and the Middle East and +the 49 earthquake 69 696 – 28003 in first half, although this fell short of last year’s figure. Lufthansa 2012 Operating result €m 3 – 171 230 159 44.7 Japan.Entered Thanksin the Commercial to our operating Register flexibility, of we were able to react Systems is continuing with its restructuring programme. The seg- Gregor Schleussner EBIT €m – 128 64 450 370 21.6 Cologne District Court under HRB 2168 15 March Press Conference and Analysts’ relatively quickly to the new conditions and adjust+ 49 our 69 flight696 – 28012plans ment’s operating profit was slightly lower than in the previous year. EBITDA €m 739 876 – 15.6 880 777 13.3 Conference on 2011 results Editorialand workflows staff to the new business climate. At the same time, The Catering segment, which further increased its operating profit, Net profi t / loss for the period €m – 206 – 104 – 98.1 301 194 55.2 Deutsche Lufthansa AG Frankhowever, Hülsmann the increased (Editor) oil price had an adverse effect on business. developed extremely positively. 3 May Release of Interim Report Investor Relations Key balance sheet and cash fl ow statement fi gures Claudio Rizzo January – March 2012 LAC, Airportring Total assets €m 29,517 29,532 – 0.1 – – – InChristian this operating Schmidt climate, the Lufthansa Group succeeded in The results posted show that the Lufthansa Group is able to 60546 Frankfurt am Main 8 May Annual General Meeting Equity ratio % 26.5 24.3 2.2 pts – – – considerably growing its revenue for the first half of 2011 and maintain its charted course even in turbulent times. Demand on Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Germany in Cologne Net indebtedness €m 1,427 1,754 – 18.6 – – – Investorbreaking Relations even with an operating result of EUR 3m.Phone: This + is 49 a 69 696 – 28008the Japanese routes has begun to recover, which we see as 2 Aug. Release of Interim Report Cash fl ow from operating activities €m 1,740 1,420 22.5 961 856 12.3 significant improvement on last year’s figure,Fax: which +was 49 also 69 696 – 90990grounds for optimism. Nevertheless, improving our competitive- Concept, design and realisation January – June 2012 Capital expenditure (gross) €m 1,437 974 47.5 693 440 57.5 affected by one-off factors. E-mail: [email protected] remains a constant challenge and the subject of our undi- HGB Hamburger Geschäftsberichte GmbH vided attention. We kept 31 pursuing Oct. the Press respective Conference programmes and Analysts’ Key profi tability and value creation fi gures & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany The Lufthansa 2nd Interim Report is a This development was largely driven by the Passenger Airline in all business segments and, whereConference necessary, on further interim stepped result Adjusted operating margin 1) % 0.4 – 1.0 1.4 pts 3.5 2.7 0.8 pts translation of the original German Lufthansa Group,Translation which by was able to clearly improve its result.
Recommended publications
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidation in Turbulent Times
    Consolidation in turbulent times Lufthansa carried a total of 70.5 million passengers last year and was ranked number one by IATA (International Air Transport Association) for having carried the most number of passengers on international scheduled routes, leaving number two Air France lagging some 20 per cent behind. The airline also made headlines when it made a the team’s achievement ‘on the playing field' and I’m number of strategic moves last year, such as confident they will rise to the challenge when the establishing Lufthansa Italia, a market-specific chips are down. network in Italy; buying a stake in American carrier JetBlue Airways; and exercising an option on bmi, In addition to our people are our robust financial giving it the second most number of slots after base and our expertise and experience in dealing British Airways at London Heathrow, Europe’s with difficult situations. busiest airport. A major contribution to the stabilisation of the It also took a leading role in consolidating in Europe group’s profitability as a whole in this environment by taking over Swiss International Air Lines and is made by our portfolio of business segments. Austrian Airlines (subject to regulatory approval by Thanks to the different cycles in the individual the European Commission), and acquiring a 45 per segments, they decisively support the sustainable cent stake in Brussels Airlines with an option to development of the group. Equally decisive, acquire the remaining 55 per cent of the company in however, is the fact that all business segments in 2011 (again, subject to regulatory approval by the themselves have a significantly lower volatility European Commission).
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: a Comparison Between Barcelona and Malpensa De-Hubbing
    Case Study: A comparison between Barcelona and Malpensa de-hubbing. Andrea Giuricin PhD. Student In “Istituzioni, Amministrazioni e Politiche Regionali” three years scholarship, jointly organised by Pavia University, Catholic University, Milan University and Politecnico di Milano, Specialization in Public Economy and Transport Economics. Lecturer in Public Finance, Faculty of Economics, University Milano Bicocca. Fellow at Bruno Leoni Institute and author of the book “Alitalia, the never-ending privatization” and other publications on transportation's sector. Abstract In April 2008, Alitalia implemented a new industrial Plan, which aimed at reducing cost and redefining the network. These applied on a new strategy of Alitalia from a multi-hub system to one- hub system. SEA, Milan airport’s operator, decided to react in two directions. First, changing strategy from hub&spoke to a point to point network model. Second, lobbing national Government to liberalize bilateral agreements. This paper examines these two strategies and the results that were achieved. The Spanish flagship carrier Iberia made an important de-hubbing in the second airport of Spain, Barcelona. In these two cases, there are some similarities but also differences. Malpensa and Barcelona made agreement with low cost carrier Easyjet to substitute national flagship carriers. They have a similar competition by a secondary airport in the catchment area, where main airline is Ryanair. However airport operator is managed by AENA, a state-owned company, while Malpensa is managed by SEA, controlled by municipality of Milan. This paper analysed data from AENA and internal data from SEA. This availability allows a statistical comparison between the different reaction’s strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Interim Report January – March 2009 ­­­Lufthansa ­­­Group Overview
    1st Interim Report January – March 2009 ­­­Lufthansa­­­ Group overview Key figures Jan. – March Jan. – March Change 2009 2008 3) in % Revenue and result Revenue €m 5,015 5,588 – 10.3 - of which traffic revenue €m 3,813 4,467 – 14.6 Operating result €m – 44 172 EBIT €m – 205 94 EBITDA €m 255 452 – 43.6 Net profit/loss for the period €m – 256 44 Key balance sheet and cash flow statement figures Total assets €m 24,468 22,790 7.4 Equity ratio % 26.1 28.7 – 2.6 pts Net liquidity 1) €m 46 888 – 94.8 Cash flow from operating activities €m 708 741 – 4.5 Capital expenditure €m 664 808 – 17.8 Key profitability and value creation figures Adjusted operating margin 2) % – 0.6 3.2 – 3.8 pts EBITDA margin % 5.1 8.1 – 3.0 pts The Lufthansa share Share price at the balance sheet day € 8.17 17.13 – 52.3 Earnings per share € – 0.56 0.10 Traffic figures Passengers thousands 15,033 15,994 – 6.0 thousand Freight/mail tonnes 375 485 – 22.7 Passenger load factor % 74.0 77.2 – 3.2 pts Cargo load factor % 54.9 66.5 – 11.5 pts Available tonne-kilometres millions 7,887 8,155 – 3.3 Revenue tonne-kilometres millions 5,155 5,872 – 12.2 Overall load factor % 65.4 72.0 – 6.6 pts Number of flights 187,738 195,677 – 4.1 Employees Employees as of 31.3. number 106,840 106,307 0.5 1) Long-term securities serving as liquidity reserves and cashable at short notice have been included in the calculation of net liquidity.
    [Show full text]
  • Elenco Codici IATA Delle Compagnie Aeree
    Elenco codici IATA delle compagnie aeree. OGNI COMPAGNIA AEREA HA UN CODICE IATA Un elenco dei codici ATA delle compagnie aeree è uno strumento fondamentale, per chi lavora in agenzia viaggi e nel settore del turismo in generale. Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree, costituito da due lettere, indica un determinato vettore aereo. Ad esempio, è utilizzato nelle prime due lettere del codice di un volo: – AZ 502, AZ indica la compagnia aerea Alitalia. – FR 4844, FR indica la compagnia aerea Ryanair -AF 567, AF, indica la compagnia aerea Air France Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree è utilizzato per scopi commerciali, nell’ambito di una prenotazione, orari (ad esempio nel tabellone partenza e arrivi in aeroporto) , biglietti , tariffe , lettere di trasporto aereo e bagagli Di seguito, per una visione di insieme, una lista in ordine alfabetico dei codici di molte compagnie aeree di tutto il mondo. Per una ricerca più rapida e precisa, potete cliccare il tasto Ctrl ed f contemporaneamente. Se non doveste trovare un codice IATA di una compagnia aerea in questa lista, ecco la pagina del sito dell’organizzazione Di seguito le sigle iata degli aeroporti di tutto il mondo ELENCO CODICI IATA COMPAGNIE AEREE: 0A – Amber Air (Lituania) 0B – Blue Air (Romania) 0J – Jetclub (Svizzera) 1A – Amadeus Global Travel Distribution (Spagna) 1B – Abacus International (Singapore) 1C – Electronic Data Systems (Svizzera) 1D – Radixx Solutions International (USA) 1E – Travelsky Technology (Cina) 1F – INFINI Travel Information (Giappone) G – Galileo International
    [Show full text]
  • Management Report 2011
    Management Report 2011 Société anonyme with share capital of 300 219 278 euros Registered offi ces: 2, rue Robert Esnault-Pelterie, 75007 Paris Mailing address: 45, rue de Paris, 95747 Roissy CDG Cedex Paris Trade and Company Register: 552 043 002 1 Corporate governance 1 1.1 The Board of Directors 2 1.2 The Group Executive Committee 28 1.3 Share capital and shareholder structure 29 2 Activity 35 2.1 Highlights of the 2011 fi nancial year 36 2.2 Market and environment 38 2.3 Strategy 44 2.4 Passenger business 48 2.5 Cargo business 50 2.6 Maintenance business 52 2.7 Other businesses 53 2.8 Highlights of the beginning of the 2012 fi nancial year 53 2.9 Fleet 54 3 Risks and risk management 61 3.1 Risk management process 62 3.2 Risk factors and their management 63 3.3 Market risks and their management 71 4 Social and environmental data 77 4.1 Social data 78 4.2 Social indicators for the Group 88 4.3 Environmental data 96 4.4 Environmental indicators for the Group 103 5 Comments on the fi nancial statements 113 This Management Report is an unoffi cial translation of the French Rapport de Gestion and has been produced by Air France-KLM for the information and convenience of English-speaking readers. No assurances are given as to the accuracy or completeness of this translation, nor any responsibility assumed for any misstatement or omission that may be contained herein. In the event of any ambiguity or discrepancy between this unoffi cial translation and the French Rapport de Gestion, the French version shall prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Data compiled from Flightglobal ACAS database flightglobal.com/acas EXPLANATORY NOTES The data in this census covers all commercial jet- and requirements, put into storage, and so on, and when airliners that have been temporarily removed from an turboprop-powered transport aircraft in service or on flying hours for three consecutive months are reported airline’s fleet and returned to the state may not be firm order with the world’s airlines, excluding aircraft as zero. shown as being with the airline for which they operate. that carry fewer than 14 passengers, or the equivalent The exception is where the aircraft is undergoing Russian aircraft tend to spend a long time parked in cargo. maintenance, where it will remain classified as active. before being permanently retired – much longer than The tables are in two sections, both of which have Aircraft awaiting a conversion will be shown as parked. equivalent Western aircraft – so it can be difficult to been compiled by Flightglobal ACAS research officer The region is dictated by operator base and does not establish the exact status of the “available fleet” John Wilding using Flightglobal’s ACAS database. necessarily indicate the area of operation. Options and (parked aircraft that could be returned to operation). Section one records the fleets of the Western-built letters of intent (where a firm contract has not been For more information on airliner types see our two- airliners, and the second section records the fleets of signed) are not included. Orders by, and aircraft with, part World Airliners Directory (Flight International, 27 Russian/CIS-built types.
    [Show full text]
  • Enjoy Your Flight with Lufthansa Italia! Today, the First New Direct Flights from Naples to Milan Malpensa
    Naples, 1 April, 2009 Enjoy your flight with Lufthansa Italia! Today, the first new direct flights from Naples to Milan Malpensa As of 1 April, Lufthansa Italia launches domestic service from Naples, Rome and Bari to Milan Malpensa Today, Wednesday 1 April, the new Naples – Milan Malpensa route was inaugurated by Heike Birlenbach, Vice President of the Milan Division of Lufthansa Italia. The first domestic flight for Naples - LH 1864 - operated by Lufthansa Italia, the Group’s new Italian company, departed from Milan Malpensa at 5:25p.m. and, on the same route, a second flight, LH 1865, will depart from Naples at 7:45 p.m. and is scheduled to arrive in Milan at 9:20 p.m. Two scheduled flights from Naples: The morning flight - LH 1861 – will operate every day except Sunday and the evening flight - LH 1865 – will operate every day. The timetable was established in order to facilitate day trips for both destinations and was especially designed to accommodate business passengers. Lufthansa Italia selected Naples as one of the first domestic destinations in its network owing to the importance of the Campania capital both in terms of tourism and for the concentration of business interests. In addition to Naples, where Lufthansa will operate 13 flights a week, as of today Lufthansa will also operate 4 flights a day for Rome and one daily flight for Bari. “We are extremely proud to introduce the first Naples- Milan flight operated by Lufthansa Italia, a company which ably combines Lufthansa’s well known characteristics of reliability and punctuality with a touch of Italian flair” declared Heike Birlenbach, Vice President of the Milan Division of Lufthansa Italia .
    [Show full text]
  • Il Rilancio Dell'aeroporto Come Strumento Di Sviluppo Del Territorio
    IlIl rilanciorilancio delldell’’aeroportoaeroporto comecome strumentostrumento didi svilupposviluppo deldel territorioterritorio Audizione in commissione consiliare Torino – 22 Luglio 2009 Audizione associazione FlyTorino – 22 Luglio 2009 FlyTorino – Chi siamo FlyTorino si propone tre obiettivi principali: 1. Sensibilizzare i cittadini e le imprese piemontesi ad identificare l’aeroporto internazionale di TRN come scalo di riferimento. 2. Promuovere TRN come porta d’accesso preferenziale per i turisti italiani e stranieri verso Torino, il Piemonte e le Alpi Occidentali. 3. Attivare un dialogo costante con istituzioni, compagnie aeree ed operatori turistici per lo sviluppo e la crescita di TRN. Audizione associazione FlyTorino – 22 Luglio 2009 WWW.FLYTORINO.IT: Un mini-portale 188 soci ed oltre 2000 utenti registrati ai canali web Audizione associazione FlyTorino – 22 Luglio 2009 Il panorama low cost in Italia Torino è l’unica grande area metropolitana in Italia a non essersi ancora dotata di una base low cost/low fare. Ryanair Myair* Air Italy* Bergamo Bergamo Napoli Roma CIA Venezia Verona Pisa Bari Bologna Foggia easyJet Cagliari Milano MXP Alghero WindJet* Trapani Catania Pescara Blu Express* Palermo Roma FCO Forlì Audizione associazione FlyTorino – 22 Luglio 2009 Il panorama low cost in Europa Torino è l’unica grande area metropolitana in Italia (ed una tra le pochissime in Europa) a non essersi ancora dotata di una base low cost. EASYJET (18) Basilea East Midlands Lione Milano-Malpensa Belfast Edimburgo Liverpool Newcastle Berlino-Schönefeld
    [Show full text]
  • Economics of the Airline Industry
    Master's Degree programme in INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT Second Cycle (D.M. 270/2004) Final Thesis Economics of the Airline Industry The Alitalia bankruptcy: a review Supervisor Ch. Prof. Chiara Saccon Assistant supervisor Ch. Prof. Marco Vedovato Graduand Andrea Rizzetto Matriculation Number 865717 Academic Year 2016 / 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor Prof. Chiara Saccon of the Management Department at Ca’ Foscari - University of Venice. She consistently allowed this paper to be my own work, but steered me in the right direction whenever she thought I needed it. I would also like to thank the air transport industry expert Captain Fabio Cassan for the professional and continued support he gave me and for the preface he wrote to sign this dissertation. Finally, last but not least, I would like to thank my family, my girlfriend and my friends, without whose support it would not have been possible this one and a half years master’s degree experience. Acknowledgements Index Preface by Fabio Cassan I Introduction IV CHAPTER ONE — Air Transport industry overview 1 1. A long story short 2 2. A fast-growing industry 4 3. International Institutional and Regulatory Environment 7 3.1. The Chicago Convention 8 3.1.1. The Freedoms of the Air 9 3.2. Airline industry privatisation 10 3.2.1. United States vs. European Union: different perspective same goal 11 3.2.2. The Effects 12 4. Aviation Industry and the World Economy 15 CHAPTER TWO — Airline Economics, Costs and Revenues 18 1. The basic airline profit equation 19 2.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA (General Sales Agent): Cos’È E Cosa Fa
    Cosa e quali sono le Alleanze aeree? Oltre la metà del trasporto aereo mondiale è nelle mani delle compagnie aeree aderenti alle alleanze. Cosa sono le alleanze aeree e perchè sono nate? La necessità da parte del passeggero di raggiungere ogni parte del mondo e quella per i vettori aerei di ridurre i costi , pur offrendo un alto livello di sicurezza e servizi, hanno fatto si che le compagnie aeree hanno stipulato tra loro degli accordi. Questi accordi hanno dato origine a gruppi distinti di compagnie , le cosiddette Alleanze aeree. Quali sono i vantaggi delle alleanze aeree per le compagnie e i passeggeri? Strettamente correlato alle alleanze aeree vi sono i concetti di code sharing e slot aereo. I vettori aerei appartenenti alla stessa alleanza possono abbattere i costi condividendo le spese per: Vendita biglietteria Personale a terra e all’ufficio check-in Gestione infrastrutture Servizi catering a bordo Vantaggi passeggeri: Prezzi più bassi dei biglietti aerei Partenze più frequenti per raggiunggere una determinata destinazione Maggior numero di destinazioni raggiungibili bonus derivanti dai programmi di fedeltà.( ad esempio Millemiglia di Alitalia) *Le Alleanze aeree per il momento sono tre. Se vuoi vedere la lista aggiornata dei membri d ti consiglio di cliccare nei link subito sotto, ognuno è collegato al sito della rispettiva alleanza STAR Codice Vettore Aereo ALLIANCE IATA Paese (sede) Slovenia Adria JP Grecia Aegean A3 Canada Air Canada AC Cina Air China CA India Air India AI Nuova Zelanda Air New Zealand NZ Giappone ANA NH Corea
    [Show full text]