2021 Capital Budget Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Carrick Survey Report
Architectural Inventory for the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Planning Sector 5: South Pittsburgh Carrick Neighborhood Report of Findings and Recommendations The City of Pittsburgh In Cooperation With: Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission October 2016 Prepared By: Michael Baker International, Inc. Jesse A. Belfast and Clio Consulting: Angelique Bamberg with Cosmos Technologies, Inc. Suraj Shrestha, E.I.T. The Architectural Inventory for the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, was made possible with funding provided by the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office (PA SHPO), the City of Pittsburgh, and the U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Certified Local Government program. The contents and opinions contained in this document do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, National Park Service; 1849 C Street N.W.; Washington, D.C. 20240. 4 | P a g e abstract Abstract This architectural inventory for the City of Pittsburgh (Planning Sector 5: Carrick Neighborhood) is in partial fulfillment of Preserve Policy 1.2, to Identify and Designate Additional Historic Structures, Districts, Sites, and Objects (City of Pittsburgh Cultural Heritage Plan, 2012). -
Borough of Mt. Oliver
MT. OLIVER BOROUGH THE MT. OLIVER PLAN BOROUGH OF MT. OLIVER THE MT. OLIVER PLAN FOCUS ON OUR FUTURE Livable Communities: Focus on Sustainable Housing and Neighborhoods Open for Business: A Sense of Place: Creating Economic Honoring our Prepared by: Activity and Social History and Gathering Places Unique Character Prepared by: Grass Root Solutions Grass Root Solutions Brean Associates August 25, 2016 Gateway Engineers GRASS ROOT SOLUTIONS 1 FUTURE RESULTS NOW March 2016 MT. OLIVER BOROUGH THE MT. OLIVER PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS RESOURCE ALLOCATION ............................................... 128 PLAN CONSISTENCY ....................................................... 132 CONSISTENCY WITH NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES ................ 132 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................... 1 CONSISTENCY WITH ALLEGHENY PLACES ........................... 132 INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 2 APPENDIX A – SURVEY RESULTS ........................................ 134 HISTORY AND STRUCTURE ................................................ 4 APPENDIX B – FOCUS GROUP INTERVIEW SUMMARIES .............. 135 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS PLANS ............................................. 6 THE MT. OLIVER PLAN PROCESS ......................................... 8 APPENDIX C – COMMUNITY TAPESTRY SEGMENTATION .............. 136 BY THE NUMBERS .............................................................. 9 APPENDIX D – PAVEMENT RATING PLAN ............................... 137 SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS -
Hays Woods Ecological and Conservation Assessment City of Pittsburgh Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
Hays Woods Ecological and Conservation Assessment City of Pittsburgh Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Report to: Allegheny Land Trust Sewickley, Pennsylvania Report by: Western Pennsylvania Conservancy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 1 July 2017 Hays Woods Ecological and Conservation Assessment OUTLINE Format and Use of this Report I. Executive Summary II. Introduction III. Description of Hays Woods Tract Geographic Details Topography, Geology, Soils and Physical Site Description Synopsis of Human History (1800-2000) Ecological Implications of Site Human History Watersheds and Streams General Watershed Descriptions Aquatic Communities, Habitats and Water Quality Habitats, Natural Terrestrial Communities, and Vegetation Invasive Plant Concentrations Flora Fauna Species of Special Concern IV. Discussion of Ecological Resources and Conservation Summary of the Hays Woods Landscape Opportunities for Conservation Ecological Challenges Management and Conservation Issues Power Lines and Pipelines Climate Change and Biodiversity Conservation V. Conclusion VI. Appendices 1. Maps (detailed list on next page) 2. Photographs for the Report 3. List of Flora 4. List of Fauna 5. Species of Special Concern 6. Aquatic Resources/Water Quality 7. References Cover photographs: Left: Appedaged waterleaf (Hydrophyllum appendiculatum), Falls Run valley, 3 May 2017. Right: View from Hays Woods escarpment downriver towards Oakland neighborhood, City of Pittsburgh, 2 June 2017. 1 Hays Woods Ecological and Conservation Assessment Western Pennsylvania Conservancy, July 2017 -
Ecology and Recovery Allegheny County
Ecology and Recovery Allegheny County Timothy Collins Jonathan Kline Kostoula Vallianos Cyril Fox 3 Rivers 2nd Nature : STUDIO for Creative Inquiry : Carnegie Mellon University : Pittsburgh Pennsylvania Ecology and Recovery Allegheny County Timothy Collins Jonathan Kline Kostoula Vallianos Cyril Fox 3 Rivers 2nd Nature : STUDIO for Creative Inquiry : Carnegie Mellon University : Pittsburgh Pennsylvania Ecology and Recovery Allegheny County Timothy Collins Jonathan Kline Kostoula Vallianos Cyril Fox STUDIO for Creative Inquiry Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania GIS Design: Jonathan Kline, Lena Andrews, Priya Krishna, John Oduroe and Kostoula Vallianos Editors: Noel Hefele, Jennifer Brodt and Tim Collins Layout design: Jonathan Kline and Noel Hefele For more information on work done by the 3 Rivers 2nd Nature Project, call 412.268.3454 or visit http://3r2n.cfa.cmu.edu Copyright © 2006 Carnegie Mellon University All rights reserved First Edition ISBN 0-9772053-9-8 STUDIO for Creative Inquiry College of Fine Arts, Rm 111 Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 www.cmu.edu/studio Cover Photo: Evidence of Acid Mine Drainage on the Monongahela River (3R2N) Map: Ecological opportunity areas in Allegheny County (3R2N) ECOLOGY AND recoverY - ALLEGHENY COUNTY Table of Contents Forward vii Executive Summary ix I. The Landscape of Allegheny County 1 II. The Demographic Context of Allegheny County 9 III. Woodland Watershed Analysis 19 IV. Other Measures of Watershed Health 29 V. Defining the River Corridor 37 VI. Measuring the Woodlands 47 VII. Measuring the Riverbank Data 63 VIII. Identifying Areas of Opportunity 69 IX. Regulation and Conservation 81 Appedicies 109 ECOLOGY AND recoverY - ALLEGHENY COUNTY Ecology and Recovery - Allegheny County vationist goal is planned and rational use of natural systems for human benefit. -
Three Rivers Park Landscape Management Guidelines
THREE RIVERS PARK LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES DECEMBER 2006 prepared by ANDROPOGON ASSOCIATES LTD. with CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. for RIVERLIFE TASK FORCE THREE RIVERS LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES PREPARED FOR RIVERLIFE TASK FORCE 2006 Andropogon Associates, Ltd. with Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. CONTENTS Acknowledgments Monitoring 48 Sample Restoration and Management Field Data Form 49 Introduction 1 Study Area 2 Sources 50 Issues 3 GIS Maps Key Recommendations GIS Methodology 51 Overall Restoration Potential Map 53 Programs 4 Forest Continuity Map 55 Practices | Landscape Cover Types 5 Bank Access Map 57 Three Rivers Park 6 Substrate Condition Map 59 Target Sites for Management Invasive Prevalence Map 61 Ohio River | Western Penitentiary 8 Allegheny River | Heinz Lofts 10 Allegheny River | Millvale Park 12 Monongahela River | Southside Park 14 Monongahela River | Homestead Works 15 River Section Maps 1. Ohio River | West End 18 Land Use Condition | Vegetation Character | Public Access | Management Assessment 2. Confluence | Three Rivers Park 20 3. Monongahela River | Southside 22 4. Monongahela River | Hazelwood 24 5. Monongahela River | Homestead 26 6. Allegheny River | Strip District 28 7. Allegheny River | Lawrenceville 30 8. Allegheny River | Highland Park 32 Management Guidelines River Edge Zones 35 Recommended Plants by Zone 36 Planting Techniques 39 Bank Stabilization Techniques Bioengineering 40 Combined Vegetated | Structural Techniques 42 Soil Binding Techniques 44 Invasive Species Identification 45 Invasive Species Management 46 LIST OF FIGURES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS FIGURE 1 Watersheds Map of Study Area intro FIGURE 2 Typical Planting (Convention Center shown for illustration) 6 Andropogon gratefully acknowledges the participation of many people who contributed, in one way or another, to the FIGURE 3 Typical Planting (Incline shown for illustration) completion of this document. -
APPENDIX a OPENSPACEPGH INVENTORY Appendix A: OPENSPACEPGH Inventory
OpenSpacePGH APPENDIX A OPENSPACEPGH INVENTORY Appendix A: OPENSPACEPGH Inventory APPENDIX A: OPENSPACEPGH INVENTORY (Park classifications and acreages current as of Dec. 2011. Park facilities inventory current as of March 2011.) Acres Community Community Garden Stairs Division Shelter Recreation Center Center Senior Pool Spray Park Pool Spray Area Play Court Tennis w/Lights Court Tennis No Lights Basketball FullCourt w/Lights Basketball No Full Court Lights Basketball Half Court w/Lights Basketball No Half Court Lights REGIONAL PARK Emerald View Regional Park 257.2 1 2 28 1 2 - 1 - 1 5 - - 2 1 - 1 Bigbee Field 0.8 - - 4 Duquesne Heights Greenway* 61.5 Eileen McCoy Parklet 0.9 - - - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - 1 Grandview Overlook 6.1 - - 5 Grandview Park 33.4 - 1 4 Band Stand 1 1 Mt. Washington Park 45.8 - - 5 1 1 1 Olympia Park 9.3 - - 5 1 1 1 Other Undesignated Property 97.4 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ream Parklet 2.0 - - 5 1 1 1 Frick Park 643.8 - - 3 2 2 6 1 1 Highland Park 377.9 - - 2 8 1 4 11 2 Riverview Park 258.8 - - 1 6 1 1 2 Schenley Park 434.1 1 1 3 7 1 5 13 regional park subtotal 1,971.7 2 3 37 24 2 - 4 - 1 17 15 17 2 2 - 4 COMMUNITY PARK Allegheny Center Park Plaza (Public Square) 2.5 - - 1 1 Allegheny Commons Park 59.9 2 - 1 - - - 1 - - 4 3 3 2 1 - - East Common Park 22.0 2 - 1 - - - 1 - 4 3 3 2 1 West Common Park 38.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Arsenal Park 8.8 - - 2 1 4 1 Banksville Park 16.6 - - 5 2 1 1 1 1 Brighton Heights Park 32.0 - - 1 1 1 1 1 Brookline Memorial Park 54.4 - 1 4 1 1 1 1 Dinan Park 16.4 - - 2 1 1 East -
Three Rivers Conservation Plan – Final – January 2004
Pennsylvania Environmental Council Three Rivers Conservation Plan – Final – January 2004 Acknowledgements The Pennsylvania Environmental Council would like to gratefully acknowledge the individuals and organizations who have provided valuable assistance in the development of the Three Rivers Conservation Plan: Joann Albert – Pittsburgh Voyager Allegheny County Planning Department Meg Balsamico – Penn Hills Township Joan Blaustein – Three Rivers Wet Weather Demonstration Project Tim Collins – 3 Rivers 2nd Nature Christine Davis – Christine Davis Consultants Hannah Ehrlich – City of Pittsburgh Stephen Farber – University of Pittsburgh Dave Fawcett – Allegheny County Council Clark Fisher – Environmental Information Services/Westsylvania Heritage Corporation J.D. Fogarty – Port of Pittsburgh Kathy Frankel – Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Sarah Miller – Riverlife Task Force Rob McCombie – Environmental Information Services/Westsylvania Heritage Corporation Beth O’Toole – Pittsburgh Voyager Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection – Pittsburgh Office Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation – Cambria, PA Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission Pittsburgh Voyager Kelly Rabenstein – Riverlife Task Force Mary Ellen Ramage – Borough of Etna Peter Ramage – Borough of Etna Riverlife Task Force Tracy Robinson – Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Tim Rogers – Shaler Township John Schombert – Three Rivers Wet Weather Demonstration Project -
Remaking HAZELWOOD
Remaking HAZELWOOD Remaking Pittsburgh Urban design recommendations for Pittsburgh’s next big urban project Remaking Cities Institute Remaking HAZELWOOD Remaking Pittsburgh Urban design recommendations for Pittsburgh’s next big urban project Elise Gatti With contributions from Jonathan Kline Renee Roy Murtuza Bhopalwala Karen Mesko Luis Rico-Gutierrez Remaking Cities Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA Copyright © September 2009 4 Contents Preface 2 Acknowledgements 3 BACKGROUND RECOMMENDATIONS INTRODUCTION FOUNDATIONS Scope 6 Vision 40 Purpose, Objectives & Benefits 8 Themes 42 An Urban Design Approach 10 Opportunities & Challenges 44 Assumptions 46 CARNEGIE MELLON Green Urbanism 48 Urban Laboratory 12 Remaking Cities Institute 14 COMPONENTS Carnegie Mellon Contributions 16 Overview 54 Urban Form 56 HAZELWOOD Frameworks 60 Focus Area 20 • Green-Blue 60 Existing Conditions & History 24 • Transportation 72 Access 28 Places 84 Community Profile 30 • Junction Hollow 86 Planning & Community Development 32 • Four Mile Run Neighborhood 90 Real Estate Market 34 • Robot City 96 • Hazelwood Town Center 104 • Riverside Neighborhood 110 • Hazelwood Greenway 118 • Hazelwood Riverfront Park 122 Legibility 128 Possible Development Scenario 134 IMPLEMENTATION Phasing 138 Development Constraints 142 Project Partners 144 Funding 146 HAZELWOOD URBAN DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Preface How can the urban design-driven redevelopment of a large riverfront brownfield in the City of Pittsburgh have a local and regional transformational impact, and what is the role of Carnegie Mellon University in the process? These questions drive the content of this document. We understand urban design as a multi-disciplinary activity of designing and arranging all the physical elements that make up cities to create harmonious, vibrant and successful places for people.