DOCSLIB.ORG

Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation for Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation for Australia Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation for Australia: An ecosystem-based classification for marine and coastal environments IMCRA Technical Group June 1998 • Version 3.3 The regionalisations presented in this report were compiled from regional frameworks developed by the Commonwealth, States and Northern Territory marine management and research agencies. The compilation was coordinated by the Biodiversity Group, Environment Australia. IMCRA Version 3.3 was developed through the technical input, information and advice of the following agencies and individuals. Numerous people contributed to previous versions of IMCRA and are acknowledged in the Acknowledgments. IMCRA Technical Group Commonwealth Australian Geological Survey Organisation (Bob Burne, now with the Australian National University) Biodiversity Group, Environment Australia (Ian Cresswell and Richard Thackway) CSIRO Division of Marine Research (Vincent Lyne and Peter Last) CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology (Neil Hamilton) Environmental Resource Information Network (ERIN), Environment Australia (Steve Blake) Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (Jim Muldoon and Joan Phillips) New South Wales New South Wales Fisheries (David Pollard) New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service (Ian Brown) Northern Territory Parks and Wildlife Commission (Ron Billyard) Queensland Department of Environment (Tim Stevens) South Australia South Australian Research and Development Institute (Karen Edyvane) Department of Environment and Natural Resources (Doug Fotheringham) Tasmania Department of Environment and Land Management (Peter Bosworth and Dave Peters) University of Tasmania (Graham Edgar) Victoria Department of Natural Resources and Environment (Don Hough and Chris Ashe) Western Australia Department of Conservation and Land Management (Chris Simpson) The report has been prepared under the auspices of the ANZECC Task Force on Marine Protected Areas. Report edited by: R Thackway and I D Cresswell, Reserve Systems Section, Biodiversity Group, Environment Australia, Commonwealth Department of the Environment. Published by: Environment Australia, Department of the Environment. The views and opinions expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the publisher, Environment Australia, Canberra. Citation: Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation for Australia Technical Group. 1998. Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation for Australia: an ecosys- tem-based classification for marine and coastal envi- ronments. Version 3.3. Environment Australia, Commonwealth Department of the Environment. Canberra. Copies of the text are available through the Environmental Resources Information Network (ERIN) on its World Wide Web Server: <http://www.environment.gov.au/net/imcra.html> Copies are also available in hard copy from: Director Marine Protected Area Strategies Marine Conservation Section Portfolio Marine Group Environment Australia Department of the Environment GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 ISBN: 0 642 54545 6 Table of Contents Acknowledgments vi 4. Uses of IMCRA 15 Preface vii 4.1 Assumptions and caveats 15 Summary viii 4.2 Terms and conditions of use 18 4.3 Responsibilities 18 1. Introduction 1 4.3.1. Custodianship 18 1.1 Australia’s Marine Biodiversity 1 1.2 The role of bioregionalisation 2 5. Towards biodiversity planning 1.2.1 A national representative system and management 19 of marine protected areas 2 5.1 IMCRA as a tool 19 1.2.2 Marine ecosystem management 3 5.1.1. Data required 19 1.3 IMCRA 5 5.1.2. Gaps 19 5.1.3. Planning a national representative 2 History and process of IMCRA 7 system of marine protected areas 20 2.1 CONCOM and ACIUCN regionalisations 7 5.1.4. Contribution towards integrated 2.2 Taskforce on marine protected areas 7 management 21 5.1.5. The next level down from 2.3 Conceptual framework and limitations of the meso-scale regions 22 current knowledge base 7 5.1.6 IMCRA and Australia’s External 2.3.1 Hierarchical structure 7 Territories 22 2.3.2 Physical versus biological 5.2 Future developments of IMCRA 22 attributes (surrogates) 7 2.3.3 Land–sea (coast) 8 6. References 23 2.3.4 Shallow versus deep waters 8 2.4 History and processes used to develop IMCRA 8 7. Abbreviations 26 2.4.1 Regionalisations developed by the inshore waters working group 9 2.4.2 Regionalisations developed by the 8. Glossary 27 offshore waters working group 9 2.4.3 Integration of regionalisation products 10 Map 1 IMCRA Meso-scale regionalisation (Version 3.1) colour section 3. IMCRA 13 3.1 Meso-scale regions 13 Map 2 IMCRA 3.2 Provinces 13 The demersal provinces and biotones colour section 3.2.1. Demersal provinces and biotones regionalisation 13 Map 3 IMCRA 3.2.2 Pelagic provinces and biotones The pelagic provinces and biotones colour section regionalisation 14 3.3 Relationships between IMCRA meso-scale regions Map 4 IMCRA and provincial regionalisation 14 Proposed provinces for the external territories colour section Table of Contents continued Table 1 Appendix 1 The key stages in the development of IMCRA 29 Specifications for developing the IMCRA regionalisation 47 Table 2 Regionalisation products developed by the inshore Appendix 2 and offshore waters working groups 30 Description of the approaches used by the inshore waters working group (States and the Northern Territory agencies) to derive the meso-scale Table 3 IMCRA regionalisation 49 Descriptions of IMCRA meso-scale regions for Map 1 31 Appendix 3 Table 4 Description of the approaches used by the Descriptions of IMCRA demersal provinces and offshore waters working group (Commonwealth biotones for Map 2 39 agencies) to derive the provincial scale regionalisations 56 Table 5 Appendix 4 Descriptions of IMCRA pelagic provinces and Guidelines for integrating the IMCRA biotones for Map 3 44 regionalisations developed by the inshore and offshore working groups 58 Table 6 Nested relationship between meso-scale regions Appendix 5 and demersal provinces 45 Detailed IMCRA meso-scale regional descriptions 59 Table 7 Appendix 6 Proposed IMCRA provinces for the External Biophysical Descriptions of the proposed IMCRA Territories to be included in IMCRA 4.0 (see Map 4) 46 provinces for the External Territories (see Map 4) 93 Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation for Australia IMCRA VERSION 3.3 Acknowledgments The developers of the Interim Marine and Third Technical Meeting: Melbourne, Coastal Regionalisation for Australia: an ecosystem- November 1996 based classification for marine and coastal environments wish to thank the following The Victorian Department of Natural Resources and agencies and individuals. Environment provided the venue and office facilities for the meeting. Damian McRae, in consultation with staff of the Victorian department, organised the meeting which was held over 18–21 November 1996. First Technical Meeting: Sydney, March 1995 Financial assistance for the meeting was provided by The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service the Portfolio Marine Group, Environment Australia. provided the venue and office facilities at the Manly Quarantine Station Conference Centre, as well as financial assistance. NSW Fisheries provided Apart from the current IMCRA Technical Group, financial assistance. The Australian Surveying and the following individuals are acknowledged as Land Information Group provided access to also having participated in the development of Geographic Information System data on marine data the IMCRA: Ernesto Ortiz, Sally McNeill, Laurie Ferns, boundaries from the Australian Marine Boundaries Hugh Chevis, Brad Miles, Ralph Roob, Chris Parvey, Information System. The National Resource Tony Smith and Matt Bolton. Information Centre compiled the available national and State and Territory coastal and marine data sets Damian McRae, in consultation with staff from as an ArcView2 application for use at the workshop. the various State department, organised the above technical meetings. Damian also prepared the record of meetings for each technical meeting, which provided the basis for developing the different Second Technical Meeting: Hobart, versions of the IMCRA report. December 1995 Sharon Pretty, in cooperation with the developers The Tasmanian Department of Environment and of the respective State and Territory regionalisations, Land Management provided the venue and office compiled many of the tables in this report. Rohan facilities for the meeting. The second technical Fernando, in cooperation with the developers of meeting formed part of a five-day technical meeting the respective State and Territory regionalisations, on ‘Managing Australia’s marine environment— compiled the IMCRA provincial and meso-scale information needs, data collection, data maps and supporting meta-data. Gavan Thomas management and regionalisations’. The five-day prepared Map 4, displaying provisional provinces meeting was organised in association with Annie for Australia’s external territories. Fiona Ross also Ilett (Department of the Environment, Sport and assisted with preparation of maps for Version 3.0. Territories) and Steve Blake (Environmental Gordon Anderson prepared Figures 1 and 2. Final Resources Information Network). edits, following the public consultation phase, were analysed and incorporated by Brian Lassig and Edward Kleverlaan. vi IMCRA VERSION 3.3 Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation for Australia Preface The sea has long been treated as a gigantic Council (ANZECC) was adopted as the appropriate ‘common’ of unlimited resources, but increased forum for achieving this coordination and awareness
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fronts in the World Ocean's Large Marine Ecosystems. ICES CM 2007
    - 1 - This paper can be freely cited without prior reference to the authors International Council ICES CM 2007/D:21 for the Exploration Theme Session D: Comparative Marine Ecosystem of the Sea (ICES) Structure and Function: Descriptors and Characteristics Fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems Igor M. Belkin and Peter C. Cornillon Abstract. Oceanic fronts shape marine ecosystems; therefore front mapping and characterization is one of the most important aspects of physical oceanography. Here we report on the first effort to map and describe all major fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs). Apart from a geographical review, these fronts are classified according to their origin and physical mechanisms that maintain them. This first-ever zero-order pattern of the LME fronts is based on a unique global frontal data base assembled at the University of Rhode Island. Thermal fronts were automatically derived from 12 years (1985-1996) of twice-daily satellite 9-km resolution global AVHRR SST fields with the Cayula-Cornillon front detection algorithm. These frontal maps serve as guidance in using hydrographic data to explore subsurface thermohaline fronts, whose surface thermal signatures have been mapped from space. Our most recent study of chlorophyll fronts in the Northwest Atlantic from high-resolution 1-km data (Belkin and O’Reilly, 2007) revealed a close spatial association between chlorophyll fronts and SST fronts, suggesting causative links between these two types of fronts. Keywords: Fronts; Large Marine Ecosystems; World Ocean; sea surface temperature. Igor M. Belkin: Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, 215 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA [tel.: +1 401 874 6533, fax: +1 874 6728, email: [email protected]].
    [Show full text]
  • Subterranean Wetlands, Stygofauna and Stromatolites of the Limestone Coast
    Subterranean Wetlands, Stygofauna and Stromatolites of the Limestone Coast Mia Thurgate Heritage Division, Department of the Environment & Heritage, Canberra Subterranean Wetlands • Ramsar definition: all underground voids containing water • Karst subterranean wetlands are a major grouping • Should viewed as part of karst hydrological system Examples in Limestone Coast • Karst springs • Wetlands associated with caves • Temporary & permanent doline lakes • ?Beach springs & •Volcanic lakes fed by offshore (marine) groundwater springs •Coastal lakes fed by groundwater Karst springs • Solution dolines with small caves at base • Discharge for aquifer • Remnant veg (peatland) • Threatened species (F & F) • Migration stop-over • Endemics • Cave diving sites • No stygobites (yet) but diverse biota Karst springs Ewens Ponds Karst springs Ewens Ponds Karst springs Piccaninnie Ponds – Ramsar nomination pending Caves Caves Cenotes: windows to the waterable Cenote Structure Surface features of cenotes Surface features of cenotes Stromatolites – part of microbialite spectrum • Lithified, organo-sedimentary deposits formed by a complex ecological association of algae, bacteria & other microbes (benthic microbial communities) • Trap and bind detritus (high energy environments, cyanophytes) • Induce the precipitation of chemical sediments (still waters, seepage points, diatoms) • Stromatolites are laminated (layered), thrombolites are clotted (no regular internal structure) Key Points: Stromatolites • Mt Gambier (Limestone Coast) is centre of stromatolite
    [Show full text]
  • South Australia's National Parks Guide
    SOUTH AUSTRALIA’S NATIONAL PARKS GUIDE Explore some of South Australia’s most inspirational places INTRODUCTION Generations of South Australians and visitors to our State cherish memories of our national parks. From camping with family and friends in the iconic Flinders Ranges, picnicking at popular Adelaide parks such as Belair National Park or fishing and swimming along our long and winding coast, there are countless opportunities to connect with nature and discover landscapes of both natural and cultural significance. South Australia’s parks make an important contribution to the economic development of the State through nature- based tourism, recreation and biodiversity. They also contribute to the healthy lifestyles we as a community enjoy and they are cornerstones of our efforts to conserve South Australia’s native plants and animals. In recognition of the importance of our parks, the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources is enhancing experiences for visitors, such as improving park infrastructure and providing opportunities for volunteers to contribute to conservation efforts. It is important that we all continue to celebrate South Australia’s parks and recognise the contribution that people make to conservation. Helping achieve that vision is the fun part – all you need to do is visit a park and take advantage of all it has to offer. Hon lan Hunter MLC Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION FOR PARKS VISITORS ................11 Park categories.......................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Way October Spirit of Australia
    Spirit Not just OF AUSTRALIA THE LARAPINTA TRAIL is not for the faint-hearted. an open kitchen, long dining table and comfortable couches. A 223km bushwalk through Central Australia’s West MacDonnell The hubs are positioned so they embrace the campfire – which is National Park, it offers challenges and rewards, drawing trekkers a quintessential part of any outback camping experience. along high, stony ridges radiating desert heat before ducking down The campsite closest to Alice Springs, near Simpsons Gap, is a walk in the park into cool, cycad-filled oases such as Standley Chasm. known as Nick Murcutt’s Camp. Near Serpentine Chalet, Charlie’s For some, tackling the trail became a bit more comfortable this Camp honours the late company guide, Charlie Holmes, who The pygmy possum, the northern corroboree frog, prehistoric pine year. As trekking season opened, World Expeditions showed off found the campsite, which is a short drive from ochre pits used by a remarkable new look for its two semipermanent campsites tucked the Western Arrernte people for thousands of years for medicinal, trees, “lost cities” and deep pink lakes – Australia’s 500-plus national parks within the park. The late Sydney architect Nick Murcutt and his religious and decorative purposes. yield beauty and secrets beyond compare. And a wealth of eco-adventure partner, Rachel Neeson, designed striking communal hubs for the Those returning from a hard day’s hike can now collapse on the minimal-impact campsites, that can be packed down when each couch and examine their blisters while guides cook them a dinner experiences, as this update of our parkland inventory – from the Indian Ocean hiking season is over.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing the Tiwi Islands Welcome to Our Islands
    FISHING THE TIWI ISLANDS WELCOME TO OUR ISLANDS The Tiwi Islands are made up of Melville and Bathurst Islands and numerous smaller, adjacent islands. The Vernon Islands also form part of the Tiwi estate. The Tiwi Traditional Owners and custodians of the area welcome you to our islands and ask that you respect and recognise the cultural importance of our land and waters. CODE OF Conduct RESPect THE RIGHts OF TRADITIONAL OWNERS. • Understand and observe all fishing regulations and no fishing zones. Report illegal fishing activities to the FISHWATCH hotline 1800 891 136 or the Tiwi Land Council HQ at Pickataramoor - 08 8970 9373. • Take no more fish than your immediate needs and carefully return excess or unwanted fish into the water unharmed. • Be courteous to all water users and those who belong to local Tiwi communities. • Respect Tiwi cultural ceremonies. This may mean that a particular area is temporarily closed to access. • Do not land ashore without first obtaining a separate Aboriginal land permit, from the Tiwi Land Council and abide by alcohol restrictions for the area. • Respect sacred sites and do not enter any part of the waters containing identified sacred sites unless specifically permitted to do so by the Tiwi Land Council. • Do not clean or dispose of fish within the vicinity of a community. • Prevent pollution and protect wildlife by removing rubbish and dispose of correctly to avoid potentially entrapping birds and other aquatic creatures. TIWI AND VERNON ISLANDS zones PERMIT FREE access The Tiwi have agreed to provide permit free access to the intertidal waters of the Tiwi and the Vernon Islands in the areas as outlined in the attached map.
    [Show full text]
  • Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13 © Director of National Parks 2013
    Director of National Parks Parks of National Director Annual ReportAnnual 2012–13 Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13 Managing the Australian Government’s protected areas © Director of National Parks 2013 ISSN 1443-1238 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process, re-used or redistributed without prior written permission from the Director of National Parks. Any permitted reproduction must acknowledge the source of any such material reproduced and include a copy of the original copyright notice. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and copyright should be addressed to: The Director of National Parks, PO Box 787, Canberra ACT 2601. Director of National Parks Australian business number: 13 051 694 963 Credits Front cover Maps – Environmental Resources Information Network Acacia alata photographed at the Australian National Botanic Gardens Designer – Papercut – David Woltschenko Editor – Byron Smith for Embellish Creative Sunrise at Booderee National Park, looking out to Bowen Island Indexer – Barry Howarth Little kingfisher, Kakadu National Park – Louise Denton Printed by – Union Offset Co. Pty Ltd Red crab, Christmas Island National Park Kakadu ranger Samantha Deegan with baby northern quoll Background image: sea urchin – Margarita Goumas Map data sources Collaborative Australian Protected Area Database, (CAPAD 2010), Commonwealth Marine Reserves:© Commonwealth of Australia, Department of the Environment, 2013 State and Territory Borders, Australian Waters: © Commonwealth of Australia, Geoscience Australia Caveat: All data presumed to be correct as received from data providers. No responsibility is taken by the Commonwealth for errors or omissions. The Commonwealth does not accept responsibility in respect to any information given in relation to, or as a consequence of anything contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework of Ichthyofaunal Ecostratigraphy of the Oligocene–Early Miocene Strata of the Polish Outer Carpathian Basin
    Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae (2006), vol. 76: 1–111. A FRAMEWORK OF ICHTHYOFAUNAL ECOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE OLIGOCENE–EARLY MIOCENE STRATA OF THE POLISH OUTER CARPATHIAN BASIN Janusz KOTLARCZYK1, Anna JERZMAÑSKA2, Ewa ŒWIDNICKA2 & Teresa WISZNIOWSKA2 1 Department of General and Mathematical Geology, AGH University of Science and Technology, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland 2 Department of Palaeozoology, Institute of Zoology, University of Wroc³aw, Sienkiewicza, 21, 50-335 Wroc³aw, Poland Kotlarczyk, J., Jerzmañska, A., Œwidnicka, E. & Wiszniowska, T., 2006. A framework of ichthyofaunal ecostrati- graphy of the Oligocene–Early Miocene strata of the Polish Outer Carpathian basin. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae, 76: 1–111. Abstract: The paper presents the results of an analysis of ichthyofaunal variability throughout the section of the Menilite-Krosno Series (MKS) in the Outer Carpathians of Poland. The studied tanathocoenoses were formed at the bottom of a more than 2,000 m deep northern basin of the Tethys, being largely represented by the continental rise and bottoms of its narrow furrows, and – to a lesser degree – the continental slope and slopes of a submarine high. Lateral variability of statististically representative assemblages of tanathocoenoses hosted in thin, isochro- nous horizons is interpreted as a result of both local changes of ichthyocoenoses and the influence of post-mortem relocation of fishes that mainly dwelled the shelf and upper continental slope. Vertical variability, in turn, is considered as a resulting from changeable conditions of the ecological environment, the input and outflow of taxa whose evolution proceeded in the Indo-Pacific area, and the species extinction. Changeability of ichthyofauna within a ca.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Vagrant Bird Review
    an atlas of the birds of new south wales and the australian capital territory Vagrant Species Ian A.W. McAllan & David J. James The species listed here are those that have been found on very few occasions (usually less than 20 times) in NSW and the ACT, and are not known to have bred here. Species that have been recorded breeding in NSW are included in the Species Accounts sections of the three volumes, even if they have been recorded in the Atlas area less than 20 times. In determining the number of records of a species, when several birds are recorded in a short period together, or whether alive or dead, these are here referred to as a ‘set’ of records. The cut-off date for vagrant records and reports is 31 December 2019. As with the rest of the Atlas, the area covered in this account includes marine waters east from the NSW coast to 160°E. This is approximately 865 km east of the coast at its widest extent in the south of the State. The New South Wales-Queensland border lies at about 28°08’S at the coast, following the centre of Border Street through Coolangatta and Tweed Heads to Point Danger (Anon. 2001a). This means that the Britannia Seamounts, where many rare seabirds have been recorded on extended pelagic trips from Southport, Queensland, are east of the NSW coast and therefore in NSW and the Atlas area. Conversely, the lookout at Point Danger is to the north of the actual Point and in Queensland but looks over both NSW and Queensland marine waters.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Archaeology and Rock Art in the Dampier Archipelago
    A review of archaeology and rock art in the Dampier Archipelago A report prepared for the National Trust of Australia (WA) Caroline Bird and Sylvia J. Hallam September 2006 Final draft Forward As this thoughtful and readable survey makes clear, the Burrup Peninsula and adjacent islands merit consideration as an integrated cultural landscape. Instead, the Western Australian government is sacrificing it to proclaimed industrial necessity that could have been located in a less destructive area. Before being systematically recorded, this ancient art province is divided in piecemeal fashion. Consequently, sites that are not destroyed by development become forlorn islands in an industrial complex. Twenty-five years ago the Australian Heritage Commission already had noted the region’s potential for World Heritage nomination. Today, State and corporate authorities lobby to prevent its listing even as a National Heritage place! This is shameful treatment for an area containing perhaps the densest concentration of engraved motifs in the world. The fact that even today individual motifs are estimated vaguely to number between 500,000 and one million reflects the scandalous government failure to sponsor an exhaustive survey before planned industrial expansion. It is best described as officially sanctioned cultural vandalism, impacting upon both Indigenous values and an irreplaceable heritage for all Australians. Instead of assigning conservation priorities, since 1980 more than 1800 massive engraved rocks have been wrenched from their context and sited close to a fertilizer plant. The massive gas complex, its expansion approved, sits less than a kilometre from a unique, deeply weathered engraved panel, certainly one of Australia’s most significant ancient art survivors.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Freshwater Catfish (Pisces: Ariidae) from Northern Australia
    Rec. West. Aust. Mus. 1988,14(1): 73-89 A new freshwater catfish (Pisces: Ariidae) from northern Australia PatriciaJ. Kailola* and Bryan E. Pierce* Abstract A new species of fork-tailed catfish is described on the basis of 31 specimens collected in northern Australia between the Fitzroy River (Western Australia) and the Mitchell River (Queensland). Arius midgleyi sp. novo grows to at least 1.3 m TL and is distinguished from other Australo-Papuan ariids by a combination of charac­ ters including snout shape, barbel length, eye size, tooth arrangement and gill raker number and position. Comparison is made with other ariid species occurring in northern Australian rivers, including the morphologically similar A. leptaspis (Bleeker). Introduction The Timor Sea and Gulf of Carpentaria drainage systems (Lake 1971) approx­ imately represent the Leichhardtian zoogeographic region of Whitley (1947). The rainfall pattern in this region is dominated by the wet monsoon (occurring within the period November to April). Most rivers here traverse a flat coastal plain about 15 km wide before reaching the sea (Lake 1971). These rivers commonly possess wide flood plains and low gradients, often contracting to a chain of waterholes during the dry season; some (Gregory River; Fitzroy to Daly Rivers) have reaches of rapids or very deep gorges. The average annual discharge from this region is 69000 billion litres (Lake 1971), most of it occurring during the wet season. Five of Australia's 18 species of fork-tailed catfishes (Ariidae) are common in this northern region, yet were overlooked by Whitley (1947) and Iredale and Whitley (1938). The members of this family, which is distributed circumglobally in the tropics and subtropics, may inhabit the sea, rivers within tidal influence, or fresh waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]