Gontrol of Gity Skyline Lndispensable for Protecting Harbour Vista Once Kai Tak Have Gone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gontrol of Gity Skyline Lndispensable for Protecting Harbour Vista Once Kai Tak Have Gone (c4-2) Gontrol of Gity Skyline lndispensable for Protecting Harbour Vista Once Kai Tak Have Gone Richard L.K. YU BAAS MScUP MHKIP MRTPI RPP(PRBHK) Member, Urban Design Group, U.K. Chatered Town Planner NomomeÍic Design and Planning Consultants Synopsis Th€ ma¡tr urban area ofHong Kong is encircled by a number of undulating hills with a Victorla llarbour at the center which hrd beeome the most famous fcåture of the clty. wlth the relocåtiotr of the K¡i Tak a¡rpoñ of Hotrg Kong which w¿s sit[âted ¡midst the city centre in July 1998, the h€ight restrict¡on of buildings imposed based on aeronautical safety reasons over the surrounding Kowloon area x,¡s relaxed, bu¡lding heights on Kowloon side have therefore been ållowed to increase dr¡m¡ticatly. Howeve¡, it is understood that the Llon Rock in the Kowloon Peninsula and the Victori¡ Pe¡k in the Hong Kong Island h¡ve been playing signilicant rol€s in complementing rnd contributing to the vicw and meaning ofthe H¡rbour. It follows that ¡f there is no surrogate urbân d€sign control meesures in the ne¡r future to monitor build¡ng heights after Ìelax¡tion of the beight control, ultra-hlgb rise buildings will inevitably be büilt sporadically in large pârts of the city ¡nd the harbour vista will d€nn¡tely be undermined- In order to avoid this undesirable situation from happening, surrogate measures restricting helght of buildings psrticularly alorg Koll loon sides of the harbour should be immediately implemented, Cities around the world iflcluding Paris, London, Seoul and even Beijing sll have effective urban design meâsures named Urban Skyline Protìle Control Strategy on controlling the building height in order to preserve the distinctive urbån form and visual characteristics of the city. However, there is r€grettably no similar plânning framework on controlling the urban form of Hong Kong. The pres€trt study proposes an Urban Skyline Profile Control Strstegy for the Kowloon Petrinsula aiming to find out and lead to â proper building height profile for n€w d€velopments and redevelopments in Kowloon' It is aÌgued that the same would provide for â more hurÍan-scaled ând elegânt 3-dimensional spatiâl form ofthe city; in â way thãt is ultimately contributing to the preservation of the character ofthe hârbour vista as an invaluable and unrecoverable nâtural heritage of Hong Kong. Keywords: buílding height control, hdrbour vista, high rße buildings, urban sþline profile, yicforia Harbout Contact: Room 1908, Kowloon Plaza,485 Castle Peak Road, Cheung Sha Wan, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, CHINA Tel: (852) 2310 1878 Fax: (852) 2370 8852 e-mail: [email protected] 30 Oclober 1999 Control of Cily Slqline lnd{sperìsoble fot Prolecling Hortrour Vìsto Once Ko¡ fqk Hor'e Gone 1 . Introduction Victoria Harbour is situated between the island of Hong Kong and the peninsula of Kowloon. Both sides of the harbour are sheltered by encircling hills, while the city of Hong Kong is in between (Figure 1). The encircling hills sheltered the harbour from the prevailing easterly winds and the onslaught of typhoons. The water was deep enough for ocean-going ships drawing up to 13 meters. The peninsula and island sho¡es have led to a long waterfront. The harbour is open at both ends resulting in a low tidal range of only 3 meters and tidal scor¡rs to keep the harbour naturally dredged. The u¡ban growth of Hong Kong took place principally along the coastal strips along both sides of the harbour and they became lhe city centre of Hong Kong and the centre of business activities. As a result, Victoria Harbour have become the most common place for amenity, recreation, relaxation and enjoyment by the public. From a visual standpoint, the encircling hills particularly the Lion. Rock in the Kowloon Peninsula and the Victoria Peak in the Hong Kong Island have also been playing significant roles in complementing and contributing to the view and meaniûg of the Vicùoria Harbour. Due to the spectacular vista this sÉecific topogaphy and land / sea rnix have bestowed, during the years the harbour and the hills combinedly have become part of the identity ofHong Kong. In the past, the height of buildings at Kowloon Peninsula was controlled by Hong Kong Airport (Control of Obstructions) Ordinance on aeronautical safety reasons and it had sculpted the existing Kowloon into a prdominantly low to medium rise morphology. With the relaxation of the building height control due to the relocation of the aþort in July 1998, building heights at Kowloon side had been 'de-controlled' overnight and was allowed to increase dramatically. The harbour vista, in which Kowloon and Hong Kong island was 'framed' by hilly backdrop and afronted by water, will defrnitely be damaged and one of an important identity of Hong Kong will be severely undermined foreve¡. In order to conserve the attractive views of Hong Kong, immediate control on the building heights is urgently needed. The present study aims to propose an urb¡n design measure entitled Urban Sþline Profile Control Strategr for Hong Kong in which the overall 3-dimentional urban morphòlogy and the visual effect of the city form are robustly considered. This study attempts to recommend a new building height control for Kowloon Peninsula, in order to maintain the overall harmony and coordination of the urban form of the main area of Hong Kong and conserve the natural heritage ofthe harbow and its vista. 2. Policy Basis for Protecting the Victoria Harbour Vista Although the issue about protecting the visual environment of the central harbour was started somewhat earlier by the planning authority of Hong Kong, the matter had not been treated seriously until perhaps recently. One of an important blueprint for planning the main urban area of Hong Kong entitled Metroplan had set up Urban Design Guidelines for 'protection and conservation of Nornornelr/c Des ign ond Plonning Consu/fonfs 2 *,jil;1- Ál t_a Fþure 1; Victoria Harbcx;r iE shEltErgd by endrcling'hl$s 30 oclobìer ì 999 control of city sh¡ine lndispensoble tor profectìng Holf,our vìsto once Koi Tok Hove Gone prominent ridgelines, peaks and hill slopes to provide a green backdrop for the cþ (Planning Department, i 991)'. However, the idea of Metroplan only stays on the conceptual level and it was never pragmatically translated into a more solid planning policy or guidance. On the other hand, the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance required all large scale development to conduct visual Impact Assessment, but the assessment being conducted is on a project-by-project basis, it does not consider the overall morphology of the city. The Protection of the Harbour ordinance which was enacted in 1997 provided a legal basis that '1he central harbou¡ is to be protected and preserved as a special asset and a natural heritage of the Hong Kong people and for that purpose there shall be a presumption against reclamation i¡ the central harbour" is by far the most direct and foremost basis for protecting the harbour. However, the ordinance suffered from the fact that it did focus on proteeting the physical size of the hgxbow but not the height of the buildings erected on lands around. From the standpoint for the comprehensive Protection of the victoria Harbour, tho h¡rbour is a heritage bec¿use of the .images' it had historicaþ formed ¡s mentâI imprinb upon the people. Judging from this angle, reclamations is strictly speaking not the root cause of damaging the view of the harbour. The high rise buildings that block the ridgeline of the encircling hills shoutd rather be the real thing to blame. Thus, the protection of the Harbour ordinance alone is not adequate to protect the central harbou¡. planning Recently, the Town Board of Hong Kong has announced the'viston & Goats for victoria Harbour' statpment; which proposed to issue new statutory outline Zoning Plans covering the harbou¡ and the waterfront areas to enhance the image of the Victoria Harbou¡. Neverthelessly, it seemed to be only aiming to protect the harbour and a small strip of areas around the waterfront, but not considering the importance on protecting the ha¡bou¡ vista and the most valuable topographical backdrop of the city i¡ra holistic manner- with the growing aspiration for a high quality of life and a better environment of the people, obviously the above existing policies does not lend enough strength to the aspects_ of protecting the victoria Harbour AND its visual environment. strategy for controlling the building heights such as an u¡ban skyline profile control straægy is therefore desperately needed for Hong Kong. 3. Experiences of Other Cities A'Skyline' can be defined as "boundary line between the sky and land cove¡" in natural or man-made landscape. Skyline conservation and management have received much attention as a planning control in other cities- cities around the world including paris, London, Seoul and Beijing all have effective urban design measures *rn"J u.b* Skyline Profile control strategy on controlling the building heights in order to preserve the distinctive cha¡acteristics ofthe area. 3.1 Beijing Nomomelrlc Des/gn and Plonn¡ng Consultonß 30 October I999 Control of Clty SMlne lndlspensoble for Prolecting Horbour Vtsto Once Koi Tok Hove Gone The Beijing municipal government have great concern in preserving the historical heritage of the city. It had designated 'cultural conservation zones' and 'development control zones'to try to protect the historical buildings, features and the vistas they have induced, like the Tiananmen Square, Forbidden City, Sanhai and Jingshan in which building heights of the surrounding fabric was strictly confolled.
Recommended publications
  • PWSC(2012-13)13 on 16 May 2012
    For discussion PWSC(2012-13)13 on 16 May 2012 ITEM FOR PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE OF FINANCE COMMITTEE Head 704 – DRAINAGE Environmental Protection – Sewerage and sewage treatment 272DS – Port Shelter sewerage, stage 2 273DS – Port Shelter sewerage, stage 3 Members are invited to recommend to Finance Committee – (a) the upgrading of part of 272DS and part of 273DS, entitled “Sewerage at Clear Water Bay Road, Pik Shui Sun Tsuen and west of Sai Kung town”, to Category A at an estimated cost of $290.6 million in money-of-the-day prices; and (b) the retention of the remainder of 272DS and 273DS in Category B. PROBLEM Sewage from unsewered areas in the Port Shelter catchment is a source of water pollution to the nearby streams and the receiving waters of Port Shelter. /PROPOSAL ….. PWSC(2012-13)13 Page 2 PROPOSAL 2. The Director of Drainage Services, with the support of the Secretary for the Environment, proposes to upgrade parts of 272DS and 273DS to Category A at an estimated cost of $290.6 million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices for implementing sewerage works in the Port Shelter catchment. PROJECT SCOPE AND NATURE 3. The part of 272DS that we propose to upgrade to Category A comprises construction of – (a) about 9.5 kilometres (km) of sewers ranging from 150 millimetres (mm) to 300 mm in diameter for eight unsewered areas, namely Kap Pin Long, Nam Shan, Pak Kong, San Uk, Sha Kok Mei, Tai Ping Village, Tai Shui Tseng and Wo Tong Kong; and (b) ancillary works.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre 1:40000 P1 Locations of Key Water Sensitive Receivers
    'l⁄ ^·” Pat Tsz Wo Penfold Park ‡_ Wong Chuk Wan TAI MONG TSAI Village¥d A KUNG KOK Nam A Wo Liu Hang LUK CHAU AU Long Keng 414 j⁄ Wo Liu FO TAN Tai Po 445 ‡_ PYRAMID HILL Tsai She Tau LUK CHAU SHAN ( TAI KAM CHUNG ) ¶¸ 536 314 Wong Chuk Yeung X¼ Cemetery ” Shan Liu LEGEND: õ¤´ ł¶B„¤N‡æ⁄` Pictorial Garden Tso Wo Hang t Fo Tan Village Olympic Equestrian Venue Ser Res ( Sha Tin ) ¥b ¤bs⁄¥ Lung Mei Tai Wan Shek Lung Tsai A»· Ngau Liu San Tin Hang Tai Mong Garden Vista Kak Hang Tun Tsai A` 281 J` MA ON SHAN COUNTRY PARK Lookout Sui Wo |fi k¤C Fu Tei SITE BOUNDARY t Court ”· NUI PO SHAN399 –l Keng Ser Res A A` Ravana Garden Mui Tsz Lam Pang Ha Hau Greenwood Terrace SHEK MUN A` Long Mei Lookout U⁄ ù© Lookout San Uk Ha Wo Che Ngong Ping “T Fu Yung Pit Muk Min Wo Tong Shan Tai Chau ƱY ¥| k¤C Kong w Pai Tau Hang NUI PO AU Sha Ha NEEDLE HILL W⁄ ¥bˆJ Nam Shan FLUSHING WATER INTAKE ͤR Sheung Wo Che Wo Che Shek Lung Tsai Sha Kok Mei Outward Bound Yau Oi Tsuen Estate F¨Ð¥Ä New Village School 532 û¤ Lap Sap SHING MUN Ngau Au T­W© j⁄ Kap Pin Long City One Shatin New Village Chau RESERVOIR n« Mau Ping 372 Tai Shui Tseng WSD1 - KOWLOON SOUTH wý TAI SHEK KWU Nam Shan Lo Uk D¹· Lek Yuen Kap Pin Long To Fung Shan Estate C Ʊ aª r´Ð ¥j T­ M©y t Pai Tau Sw P Shek Kwu Lung Ser Res YUEN Yue Tin «ø T­W© Mau Ping 314 Wo Yi Hop Court j¤Å Mau Ping Tan Cheung CHAU KOK Castello Tai Lam Liu 300 ⁄ 70 San Uk A» Ð¥ Wong Uk ¶d ¥ Kwun Tsoi Pai Tin Liu s•«« p¤w Wong Nai Tau SHEK NGA SHAN Yau Ma Po New Town Siu Lek Tai Ping ‹Q Pristine Villa Plaza s¼½ j¤ 540 j¤| r´A Yuen
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 14.5.2 Locations of Key Water Sensitive Receivers
    'l⁄ ^·” Pat Tsz Wo Penfold Park ‡_ Wong Chuk Wan TAI MONG TSAI Village¥d A KUNG KOK Nam A Wo Liu Hang LUK CHAU AU Long Keng 414 j⁄ Wo Liu FO TAN Tai Po 445 ‡_ PYRAMID HILL Tsai She Tau LUK CHAU SHAN ( TAI KAM CHUNG ) ¶¸ 536 314 Wong Chuk Yeung X¼ Cemetery ” Shan Liu LEGEND: õ¤´ ł¶B„¤N‡æ⁄` Pictorial Garden Tso Wo Hang t Fo Tan Village Olympic Equestrian Venue Ser Res ( Sha Tin ) ¥b ¤bs⁄¥ Lung Mei Tai Wan Shek Lung Tsai A»· Ngau Liu San Tin Hang Tai Mong Garden Vista Kak Hang Tun Tsai A` 281 J` MA ON SHAN COUNTRY PARK Lookout Sui Wo |fi k¤C Fu Tei SITE BOUNDARY t Court ”· NUI PO SHAN399 –l Keng Ser Res A A` Ravana Garden Mui Tsz Lam Pang Ha Hau Greenwood Terrace SHEK MUN A` Long Mei Lookout U⁄ ù© Lookout San Uk Ha Wo Che Ngong Ping “T Fu Yung Pit Muk Min Wo Tong Shan Tai Chau ƱY ¥| k¤C Kong w Pai Tau Hang NUI PO AU Sha Ha NEEDLE HILL W⁄ ¥bˆJ Nam Shan FLUSHING WATER INTAKE ͤR Sheung Wo Che Wo Che Shek Lung Tsai Sha Kok Mei Outward Bound Yau Oi Tsuen Estate F¨Ð¥Ä New Village School 532 û¤ Lap Sap SHING MUN Ngau Au T­W© j⁄ Kap Pin Long City One Shatin New Village Chau RESERVOIR n« Mau Ping 372 Tai Shui Tseng WSD1 - KOWLOON SOUTH wý TAI SHEK KWU Nam Shan Lo Uk D¹· Lek Yuen Kap Pin Long To Fung Shan Estate C Ʊ aª r´Ð ¥j T­ M©y t Pai Tau Sw P Shek Kwu Lung Ser Res YUEN Yue Tin «ø T­W© Mau Ping 314 Wo Yi Hop Court j¤Å Mau Ping Tan Cheung CHAU KOK Castello Tai Lam Liu 300 ⁄ 70 San Uk A» Ð¥ Wong Uk ¶d ¥ Kwun Tsoi Pai Tin Liu s•«« p¤w Wong Nai Tau SHEK NGA SHAN Yau Ma Po New Town Siu Lek Tai Ping ‹Q Pristine Villa Plaza s¼½ j¤ 540 j¤| r´A Yuen
    [Show full text]
  • For Discussion on 23 April 2012 Legislative Council Panel On
    For discussion on 23 April 2012 Legislative Council Panel on Environmental Affairs 272DS – Port Shelter sewerage, stage 2 273DS – Port Shelter sewerage, stage 3 331DS – Outlying Islands sewerage, stage 2 – South Lantau sewerage works PURPOSE This paper seeks Members’ support for our proposals to – (a) upgrade part of 272DS – Port Shelter sewerage, stage 2 to Category A at an estimated cost of $107.1 million; (b) upgrade part of 273DS – Port Shelter sewerage, stage 3 to Category A at an estimated cost of $183.5 million; and (c) upgrade part of 331DS – Outlying Islands sewerage, stage 2 – South Lantau sewerage works to Category A at an estimated cost of $30.0 million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices. PROJECT SCOPE 272DS – Port Shelter sewerage, stage 2 2. The part of 272DS that we propose to upgrade to Category A comprises the construction of – (a) about 9.5 kilometres (km) of sewers for eight unsewered areas, namely Kap Pin Long, Nam Shan, Pak Kong, San Uk, Sha Kok Mei, Tai Ping Village, Tai Shui Tseng and Wo Tong Kong; and (b) ancillary works. A site plan showing the proposed works is at Enclosure 1. 273DS – Port Shelter sewerage, stage 3 3. The part of 273DS that we propose to upgrade to Category A comprises the construction of – (a) about 3.3 km of sewers for three unsewered areas, namely Lung Wo Tsuen, Pik Shui Sun Tsuen and the vicinity of Fei Ngo Shan Road; (b) about 3.6 km gravity trunk sewers from Shun Chi Street to Razor Hill Road and around Pik Shui Sun Tsuen; (c) one sewage pumping station (SPS) at Pik Shui Sun Tsuen; (d) about 900 metres (m) of twin rising mains at Pik Shui Sun Tsuen (in association with construction of the SPS in (c) above) and along sections of Clear Water Bay Road near Tseng Lan Shue and Pak Shek Wo; and (e) ancillary works.
    [Show full text]
  • For Sai Kung District Council Housing and Environmental Hygiene Committee on 15 November 2018 SKDC(HEHC) Paper No
    For Sai Kung District Council Housing and Environmental Hygiene Committee on 15 November 2018 SKDC(HEHC) Paper No. 143/18 Port Shelter Sewerage Projects – Progress Update Purpose This paper serves to update Members on the latest progress of Public Works Project Item Nos. 4272DS – “Port Shelter sewerage, stage 2” and 4273DS – “Port Shelter sewerage, stage 3”. Background 2. At present, sewage from Port Shelter areas is often treated and disposed of by means of existing private treatment facilities (such as septic tanks and soakaway systems). These facilities are often ineffective in removing pollutants due to their proximity to watercourses or inadequate maintenance. Therefore, sewage from these unsewered areas has been a source of water pollution to the receiving waters of Port Shelter. 3. The Government has formulated a long-term programme under the “Port Shelter Sewerage Master Plan” to expand the public sewerage in Port Shelter areas. 4272DS – “Port Shelter sewerage, stage 2” and 4273DS – “Port Shelter sewerage, stage 3” are the relevant projects currently being implemented. Drainage Services Department (DSD) briefed and consulted Members on the above projects on 15 April 2008 and 31 March 2009, and updated Members on the implementation progress on 14 March 2013. Members expressed their support for the projects in the above meetings. Latest Progress 4. The 1st package of the above two projects, including the trunk sewers along Clear Water Bay Road and Razor Hill Road, as well as the sewerage works at West of Sai Kung town and in the vicinity of Fei Ngo Shan Road, was upgraded to Category A in June 2012 and re-titled as 4382DS – “Sewerage at Clear Water Bay Road, Pik Shui Sun Tsuen and west of Sai Kung town”.
    [Show full text]
  • Cavern Master Plan – Information Note
    - 1 - CAVERN MASTER PLAN – INFORMATION NOTE STRATEGIC CAVERN AREA NO. 28 – TAI SHEUNG TOK This Information Note describes the characteristics, key development opportunities and constraints of Strategic Cavern Area No. 28 - Tai Sheung Tok (the SCVA). It indicates the potential land uses suitable for cavern development within the area, but would not pre-empt other possible land uses put forward by the project proponents with justifications. It also denotes the extent of potential portal locations. The spatial context of the SCVA is illustrated in the Reference Drawing appended to this Information Note. Reference should be made to the Explanatory Statement of the Cavern Master Plan for its background and purposes, as well as the definition and delineation criteria of SCVAs. 1. Location Plan Information Note (SCVA28 – Tai Sheung Tok) - 2 - 2. Strategic Cavern Area Details Outline Zoning Plans (OZPs): Approved Kwun Tong (North) OZP No. S/K14N/15 Approved Tseng Lan Shue OZP No. S/SK-TLS/8 Draft Tseung Kwan O OZP No. S/TKO/25 Area: 90.7 ha Maximum elevation in the SCVA: +399 mPD Minimum elevation in the SCVA: +160 mPD 3. District Context Location The SCVA is located at Tai Sheung Tok which is located in East Kowloon. Tseng Lan Shue is located to the northeast of the SCVA, Ma Yau Tong is to the southeast, Sau Mau Ping and Ngau Tau Kok are to the southwest, Jordan Valley is to the west and Fei Ngo Shan is to the northwest. The SCVA is generally hilly with a maximum elevation of about +399 mPD. About half of the SCVA in its southwestern side overlaps with the Anderson Road Quarry (ARQ), which ceased operation in July 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • M / Sp / 14 / 134 200
    nzhen He ) ( She 98 River ¥Œ 157 S h N¦ PAK FU SHAN a B§½ Â| T ¬ a Chun u n CROOKED ISLAND »­é s• PAK KUNG AU ª¨¤ w‹ K †n Sham 100 o ROBINSON ISLAND Chau Mei Heung Yuen San Kwai Tin k SAI AP CHAU Chek Kok ¬½Â R ( Kat O ) Qªé 200 i øªÆ (AP CHAU) Wai ver Kok Lin Ma Ledge Point Tau Tsung Yuen Ha 100 Fª ˦ F¨Y (Cheung Pai Tau) û½ Hang Tung O Chuk Yuen 440 SHA TAU KOK AP CHAU HOI Kai Kung Tau 122 –V ˆ„T‚ s¤ è¦ 37 U⁄fi Shan Tsui Sai O Cham Keng 200 T¤¤ ł“ û½ 6.5.1 300 Ha Tam Shui Sam Kok Tsui 50 Chau QÆd KAI KUNG 6.4.2 400 _” CHEUNG Hang LENG F“›¥w‹ Yim Liu Ha Yung Shue Au SHEK TSUI CROOKED HARBOUR TUNG PING CHAU MARINE PARK õ¬á 131 100 300 ¶ ( Kat O Hoi ) 100 ¶d ¥F ROBIN'S NEST j¤Z 492 Tong To ¸I O PUI TONG 100 WONG NAI CHAU ROUND ISLAND ²ÂY ( Hung Fa Leng ) AU PUI LENG TAI NIM CHAU w¬ ( Pak Sha Chau ) Kang Lau Kan Tau 400 HOK NGAM ⁄ ´¥ª Chau Tau Shek Wai p¤Z v¬ 45 TENG Muk Wu ñ»Ä TA KWU LING 100 7.4.3 ⁄A Fung Wong Frontier Closed Area Boundary SIU NIM CHAU YEUNG CHAU 75 120 200 STARLING INLET ê¹ 118 ¶E MAN KAM TO g¶ÐWu 300 ¥M Qfl W© WONG FONG SHAN ­¥ Chow Tin 297 So Lo Pun X¼ Lap Wo Wu Shek ( Sha Tau Kok Hoi ) Tsuen Ping Yeung 200 245 104 FUN CHAU PING CHAU s·Î 200 ³¶ Tsuen Kok San Uk 100 CRESCENT Ma Tseuk Leng 43 Ling River TSING CHAU LEK BAY 100 QÆ_ ¦¨ 139 Zfi 6.5.1100 224 DEEP PASS Ganges 100 ˆ„T‚ Yim Tso KUK PO 200 ñ» 228 CRESCENT ISLAND F¨ Ha ¦¨H® 235 6.4.1 Fung Hang ( Ngo Mei Chau ) Sha Ling øª U¸Î U⁄ Kuk Po Lo Wai j¤H 200 flK CHEUNG ROAD Ha Wo Hang Tai Po Tin Man Uk û¦¨ £®s SHAN KOK Lai Chi Wo 167 Pin W© TAU Kai Kuk Shue Ha HUNG
    [Show full text]
  • HONG KONG ISLAND Ser Res 5 «§⁄ 400 MIDDLE GAP GAP X¼ ¡`§ »› T Fung Wah SCALE DRAWING NO
    p¤wà C Ʊ Estate aª ¥j T­ t Pai Tau Sw P ê¶w M©y YUEN WO ROAD r´Ð «ø Shek Kwu Lung Mau Ping Ser Res YUEN T­W© _¥ R Wo Yi Hop Yue Tin The Castello j¤Å Tan Cheung 314 Mau Ping Pak Kong Au SHING MUN RIVER CHANNEL CHAU KOK Tai Lam Liu Water Tunnel Court 400 San Uk Pristine Villa ⁄ 70 ¥ Ø¿⁄ SH Ð¥ Kwun Tsoi Pai 200 ING Wong Uk ¶d «ø MUN 200 SHEK NGA SHAN SHING MUN ROAD 300 Tin Liu p¤w Yau Ma Po ú¥OªÐ Wong Nai Tau 300 t F¨ 20 Siu Lek 540 Tai Ping Kwong Pan Tin TUNNEL ROAD Æ“ s Sha Tin Ser Res SHA TIN ROAD s¼½ j¤ Tsuen MTR/AP/43 San Tsuen H ‹Q j¤| Yuen Fa Sam Hang TAI CHUNG KIU ROAD Kwong Yuen d±L Tai Che 192 flK Town Hall Ϋ Po Lo Yeung Chau –‰ T¤¯· «ø“G Mei Chung s¤ F¨ Estate Hong Lam _¥ “T Lai Chi ⁄˛ 300 Tso Kung Sam Tung Uk Court ß⁄ s¼LCourt Uk Cheung Che Tam Fu Yung Shan W¤ª Yuen Wong Uk Pak Kong ú¥Oª ƒ Resite Village Ngau Pei Sha Kwong Lam C ‹ SHA TIN F¨Ð Kwong Pan Tin Lo Wai Village F¨wà SHEUNG ¥ Court 200 HIGHWAY 312 May Shing ´«‚”·¸ ¶¸ SAI KUNG Tsuen F¨Ð¥ Fui Yiu Cham Tau s· Prince of Wales Y¡·Øfi KWAI CHUNG «ø“ PAK TIN Court r· A Wong Chuk Shan ø–⁄ W Ha Chau Ha Fa shan fl´« flW˘ San Tsuen fi Hospital H Chap Wai Kon 100 Yue Shing ¥—¥ 100 Lei Muk Shue »r ROAD IG Allway Gardens Tsuen Wan Centre 100 F¨Ð¥ H New Village ß⁄¥F “W G¤@ Hoi Pa Resite t WAI K HIRAM'S Pak Tin Pa Łƒ… Tung Lo Wan Court F¨¤ E Yi Pei H¶s Ser Res Estate R »­» øpfi ‹L TIN L Ngau Pei Sha Wu Lei Tau aª MTR/AP/42 Village CHEUNG PEI SHAN ROAD SHING MUN TUNNEL Sha Tin Park SHA A C Sai Kung San Tsuen ¥—¥ Sai Lau Kok Cheung Shan 252 Granville Garden Sha Kok Estate F¨Ð SH ¡´é Chun
    [Show full text]
  • M / Sp / 14 / 173 200 See Plan Ref
    M†⁄ ˛«g PAK SHUI WUN Pik Uk Correctional Institution j¤Ç ”A ˛ UNIVERSITY PORT SHELTER ˛« ROAD Pik Uk Prison PIK UK AU ( NGAU MEI HOI ) TRAIL ÂÅl A»fi 432 Balmoral Garden RAZOR HILL RAZOR HILL ROAD (CHE KWU SHAN) WILSON ”A Green Park »›·‹ _˜ æ”' GreenView Garden The Hong Kong University P Razor Park of Science and Technology Hillview Court CLEAR WATER M†⁄W ¥ 300 j¤H Clear Water Bay Pak Shek Wo Tai Po Tsai Apartments ¥ «⁄ R˜†W Pak Shek Terrace Tseng Lan Shue Rise Park Villas BAY ROAD Łƒ^§⁄ł§¤‚˛†p›ˇ M / SP / 14 / 173 200 SEE PLAN REF. No. M / SP / 14 / 173 FOR SAI KUNG VILLAGE CLUSTER BOUNDARIES 1 s Ser Res Lung Wo Tsuen 100 `² “ SAM LONG ´¬ H« 2 Shaw Studio 100 TAN SHAN A KUNG WAN s·a Sun Tei Village p⁄fi ” Bella Vista Siu To Yuen Village KUNG WAN ROAD AH 26 ±¦Ë· Wƺ´p W W¥ 100 Villas Caquecoy View Point ½ Au Tau 8.3.6 È 4 5 È»r TAI WONG WAN 200 o § j¤û m– YA Dragon Lake Villa TERRACE ROAD U YUE WAN VILLAGE ANDERSON RD TAI NGAU WU 21 189 SILVER N±x­ 8 RD _Ä {‰‡ łfi S Tseung Kwan O Village 7 I LAI Yau Yue Wan L V Village E 300 R ROAD WING 6 s· C R fi⁄ Dragon Lake Villa E S PO LAM ROAD NORTH M†⁄ T The Villa Horizon R D q• 13 ^­ú 20 I· _Ä Ying Ming Fullway Garden 3 _ÄL PO LAM Court 380 9 Po Lam Estate {‰ ¨»fi KING Yau Yue Wan Casa Bella 200 Yªú _ÄA» PO FUNG ROAD Yan Ming ¨»¤ ¥q 12 YIN Po Tsui Park Court _˜Y YAN KING ROAD 100 Quarry RD È»u½WÆ YUK NGA LANE LANE 14 19 OAD Silverstrand Garden 300 s·£ R j¤W IJG YIP BEACH A Y TAI SHEUNG TOK SILVERSTRAND I´RÄ YING º´ú Finery Park 10 _Äd Yªº 18 N±x King Ming 15 MAU YIP ROAD ˜ M†⁄W˘ 1 Court 11 Film
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical Data for Hong Kong Stream Sediments
    GEOCHEMICAL DATA FOR HONG KONG STREAM SEDIMENTS GEO REPORT No. 230 R.J. SEWELL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OFFICE CIVIL ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION GEOCHEMICAL DATA FOR HONG KONG STREAM SEDIMENTS GEO REPORT No. 230 R.J. SEWELL This report is largely based on GEO Geological Report No. GR 1/2007 produced in July 2007 - 2 - © The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region First published, July 2008 Prepared by: Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department, Civil Engineering and Development Building, 101 Princess Margaret Road, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong. - 3 - PREFACE In keeping with our policy of releasing information which may be of general interest to the geotechnical profession and the public, we make available selected internal reports in a series of publications termed the GEO Report series. The GEO Reports can be downloaded from the website of the Civil Engineering and Development Department (http://www.cedd.gov.hk) on the Internet. Printed copies are also available for some GEO Reports. For printed copies, a charge is made to cover the cost of printing. The Geotechnical Engineering Office also produces documents specifically for publication. These include guidance documents and results of comprehensive reviews. These publications and the printed GEO Reports may be obtained from the Government’s Information Services Department. Information on how to purchase these documents is given on the second last page of this report. R.K.S. Chan Head, Geotechnical Engineering Office July 2008 - 4 - FOREWORD This report is a compilation of all stream sediment geochemical data for Hong Kong held within the Hong Kong Geological Survey archive.
    [Show full text]