No. 51: Chechnya and the North Caucasus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No. 51: Chechnya and the North Caucasus russian analytical russian analytical digest 51/08 digest analysis The North Caucasus after the Georgia-Russia Conflict By Stacy Closson, Berlin Abstract Russia’s military action against Georgia and its recognition of the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia may have strengthened calls for independence by groups within some of the North Caucasus repub- lics and further undermined the stability of an already troubled region. Most importantly, the fighting in Georgia has activated the trade flows of arms and fighters between the North and South Caucasus, increas- ing the potential for conflict in both places. Since the war, Russia has faced levels of violence on its own ter- ritory not seen since the last Chechen war. North-South Caucasus Ties During the Georgian war, some North Caucasian re- Prime Minister Vladimir Putin argued that Russia’s publics sent military aid and fighters into Abkhazia August military action in Georgia was aimed in part and South Ossetia ultimately establishing themselves at quelling instability in the Russian republics of the as semi-autonomous actors in the broader Caucasian North Caucasus in a mid-September meeting with theatre of conflict, posing a potential threat to Russian the Valdai Discussion Club – a collection of academ- interests in the future. ics from around the world. He stated that, “certain non- governmental organizations in certain republics” had Fighters and Arms “raised the question of separation from Russia under A major challenge facing Russia is how the ties formed the pretext of the lack of protection given to South among groups in the North and South Caucasus as a Ossetia.” That is, the Russian military incursion into result of the August conflict will affect regional stability. Georgia was necessary, in part, to quell calls for inde- There is a direct historical correlation between height- pendence from some of the seven North Caucasus re- ened activities in the North and South Caucasus and an publics. Putin did not mention from which republics increase in transfers of fighters and weapons across the these calls emanated: Adygea, Dagestan, Ingushetia, region. During the Chechen wars of the 1990s, there Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachaevo-Cherkessia, North was a lucrative trade of arms across the region and Ossetia-Alania, or Chechnya. Georgians played an active intermediary role between Russian officials provide different measures of the se- Russian and Chechen businessmen. Dmitry Butrin, riousness of the situation in the North Caucasus. Putin’s Chief of the Economic Policy Desk at Kommersant, spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, confirmed that despite reported that the recent conflict between Russia and the government’s recognition of Abkhazia and South Georgia will once again fuel a breeding ground for lu- Ossetia, Russia stood behind the principle of territori- crative sales of military weaponry by the security ser- al integrity. He said that while there were some separat- vices that dominate North and South Ossetia. Just in ists and extremists in the North Caucasus, their activ- the past two months, large weapons caches, as well as ities were not significant and suggested that their calls an anti-air missile defense system of foreign origin, have for independence did not warrant consideration. At the been discovered by Russian forces in Chechnya. same time, the commander of Russia’s Interior Troops, Prior to the August conflict, informal trade had General Nikolai Rogozin, reported that up to 500 mil- weakened as a result of periodic disruptions to the itants were currently active in the North Caucasus and north-south corridor across the Georgian border since Russia had 30,000 troops stationed in the region. These 2004. The disruptions came in part because of the re- forces conducted over 2,000 operations and killed 50 form efforts of the Saakashvili government to strength- militants in 2007, and even more in 2008. en border and customs regimes, and the closure of infor- The aftermath of the Georgia-Russia conflict and mal trading markets on the de facto Georgia/Ossetian- the recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as in- Abkhazian borders. It was also due to Russian sanctions dependent states present a major challenge for ensur- imposed in 2005 on goods and travel from Georgia. ing stability across the Caucasus. Most important is Moreover, in spring 2008 after the Russian govern- the extent to which relations between the North and ment officially lifted a 1996 embargo on Abkhazia and South Caucasus will affect the levels of militarization. South Ossetia and provided development assistance, 2 russian analytical russian analytical digest 51/08 digest including repairing a railroad connection from Russia Groups of fighters from the other republics, on through Abkhazia, economic relations in these regions the other hand, were united with their governments was re-oriented north. in supporting Russia and the Ossetians. The Adygea This south-north trade began to reverse direction and Cherkess formed groups of fighters and, alongside in the lead up to the August conflict, when the infor- Chechens, participated in removing the Abkhaz gov- mal arms transfers increased in proportion to the move- ernment-in-exile from the Kodori gorge. They also tem- ment of “volunteers” from the north into Georgia. The porarily patrolled Georgian villages in the Gali region Black Sea Press in May 2008 reported warnings from of Abkhazia. A unit of Cossack volunteers was pres- South Ossetia’s de facto President Eduard Kokoity that ent in Sukhumi during the war and pledged their sol- an alliance with the North Caucasus was needed to idarity with the Abkhaz should Georgia try to invade. prevent genocide against his people. Georgian televi- Another Cossack unit was apparently fighting around sion showed that the Confederation of the Peoples of Gori, Georgia. Likewise, the North Ossetians stood the North Caucasus was preparing to support Abkhazia by their brethren in South Ossetia, providing shelter in the case of a conflict with Georgia. In the first week for refugees and even soldiers to fight alongside the of May, 700 soldiers were re-deployed from Khankala Russians. North Ossetia continued to act as the de fac- military base in Chechnya to Abkhazia. Units from the to fourth actor in the South Ossetian conflict, along North Caucasus were already serving as peacekeepers in with Russia, Georgia, and the South Ossetians, as a the Gali region of eastern Abkhazia. Then in June the member of the Joint Control Commission, responsible Russian news agency Regnum reported that Russian for conflict resolution and peacekeeping operations in Cossacks from Karachaevo-Cherkessia were preparing the South. At the same time, the North Ossetians had to serve on the border between Abkhazia and Georgia. trained the South’s military and provided leadership There were even accusations in the Georgian press that and arms in the lead up to the conflict. it was the Chechens who were responsible for a series The Dagestan government was the only republic of attacks in Abkhazia during July, supposedly as part to remain neutral, pre-occupied with violent clashes of a provocation to Georgian military action. on its territory and border problems with Azerbaijan. During the August conflict, the North Caucasus For some Dagestanis, it was disturbing that the Vostok groups divided their sympathies based on co-ethnic battalion fighting in and around Tskhinvali and Gori ties, relations with Georgia, and degree of allegiance was headed by a wanted man who allegedly had killed towards Russia. The populations also sometimes dif- their Dagestani kin in a Chechen village in June 2005. fered from their leadership. For example, the Chechens Dagestan is viewed as the most troubled area in the and Ingush sympathized with Georgia, but their leaders North Caucasus at the moment. It serves as a major came out very publicly against Saakashvili’s “invasion” transit route for drugs and weapons from Central Asia of South Ossetia. The Chechen rebel leader Umarov through the North Caucasus and westward to the Black criticized Russia and appealed to the Caucasus peoples Sea. This corridor became even more lucrative after not to get involved in the conflict. Nevertheless, as with Afghanistan increased heroin production and demand the war in Abkhazia in the early 1990s, several thou- for weapons grew in the Caucasus. The Dagestani-Azeri sand Chechen troops served as border guards along the border has been the scene of regular incursions with Abkhaz and Ossetian border. Chechens also helped the both sides accusing the other of inciting violence. The Abkhaz to clear out the Georgian-government-backed Lezgin Sadval movement, which aspires to its own terri- Abkhaz government-in-exile from the Kodori gorge in torial autonomy on land that is now partly in Dagestan upper Abkhazia. Chechens from the Vostok battalion and partly in Azerbaijan, comprises a combined popu- fought in South Ossetia, reportedly both propelling lation more than twice that of the Abkhaz in Abkhazia. the Georgians out of Tskhinvali, as well as saving many Since August, Azeri and Russian security forces have Georgian civilians from revenge attacks by Ossetians been conducting counter insurgency operations in the and Russians. There were unconfirmed reports that border region against alleged Dagestani militants. Chechens may have fought with the Georgians, related to more unconfirmed reports that Chechen rebels were Russia’s Unresolved Conflict: Prigorodniy still seeking safe haven in Georgia’s northern Pankisi Region gorge. In an interview, Chechen President Kadyrov ad- The increase in the flow or arms and fighters across the mitted that he was not in command of the over 17,000 region could increase the chances of conflict between volunteers eager to fight in Georgia. Ossetia and Ingushetia. Up until last month, the South 3 russian analytical russian analytical digest 51/08 digest Ossetian leadership had persistently stated that it want- Three months later, Putin removed Zyazikov and re- ed accession to the Russian Federation through unifi- placed him with Army Colonel Yunus-Bek Yevkurov.
Recommended publications
  • Instrument of Ratification)1
    Proposed Declaration (instrument of ratification)1 1. In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Charter, the Russian Federation undertakes to apply the provisions of Part II to all the regional or minority languages spoken within its territory and which comply with the definition in Article 1. 2. In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 2, and Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Charter, the Russian Federation declares that the provisions set out below shall apply to the following languages in the specified territories: Abaza (Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia), Adyghe (Republic of Adygea), Aghul (Republic of Dagestan), Altai (Republic of Altai), Avar (Republic of Dagestan), Azeri (Republic of Dagestan), Balkar (Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria), Bashkir (Republic of Bashkortostan), Buryat (Republic of Buryatia), Chechen (Republics of Chechnya and Dagestan), Cherkess (Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia), Chuvash (Republic of Chuvashia), Dargin (Republic of Dagestan), Ingush (Republic of Ingushetia), Kabardian (Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria), Kalmyk (Republic of Kalmykia), Karachay (Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia), Khakas (Republic of Khakasia), Komi (Republic of Komi), Kumyk (Republic of Dagestan), Lak (Republic of Dagestan), Lezgian (Republic of Dagestan), Mountain and Meadow Mari (Republic of Mari El), Moksha and Erzya Mordovian (Republic of Mordovia), Nogai (Republics of Dagestan and Karachay-Cherkessia), Ossetic (Republic of North Ossetia), Rutul (Republic of Dagestan), Sakha (Republic of Sakha), Tabasaran (Republic of Dagestan), Tat (Republic of Dagestan), Tatar (Republic of Tatarstan), Tsakhur (Republic of Dagestan), Tuvan (Republic of Tuva) and Udmurt (Republic of Udmurtia) Article 8 – Education Paragraph 1.a.i; b.ii; c.ii; d.ii; e.ii; f.i; g; h; i. Article 9 – Judicial authorities Paragraph 1.a.ii; a.iii; a.iv; b.ii; b.iii; c.ii; c.iii.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Lentil: Soviet Ethnic Cleansing of the Chechens Tom Shattuck
    The Histories Volume 10 | Issue 2 Article 7 2019 Operation Lentil: Soviet Ethnic Cleansing of the Chechens Tom Shattuck Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Shattuck, Tom (2019) "Operation Lentil: Soviet Ethnic Cleansing of the Chechens," The Histories: Vol. 10 : Iss. 2 , Article 7. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol10/iss2/7 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH stories by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Histories, Volume 10, Number 2 92 VI Operation Lentil: Soviet Ethnic Cleansing of the Chechens By Tom Shattuck ‘13 On February 23, 1944, Lavrentii Beria ordered for the NKVD to systemically remove all of the Chechen people from their homes in the Caucuses to Kazakhstan and Kirghizia in Central Asia. Before this cleansing, the Chechens had a history of tension with the Russians. This age- old conflict culminated after the Germans retreated when the Soviet Union charged the entire Chechen population with treason for aiding the Germans. Despite the fact that several thousand Chechen men had volunteered in the Red Army to help fight the Germans, Stalin still used the pretext of a German retreat through an area of the Chechen-Ingush Autonomous Republic to condemn them all. In reality, Stalin just wanted to finally end the Chechen problem. Because the cleansing removed every Chechen from their home, the process proved to be brutal and deadly for the Chechens.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus: the Challenges of Integration (III), Governance, Elections, Rule of Law
    The North Caucasus: The Challenges of Integration (III), Governance, Elections, Rule of Law Europe Report N°226 | 6 September 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Russia between Decentralisation and the “Vertical of Power” ....................................... 3 A. Federative Relations Today ....................................................................................... 4 B. Local Government ...................................................................................................... 6 C. Funding and budgets ................................................................................................. 6 III. Elections ........................................................................................................................... 9 A. State Duma Elections 2011 ........................................................................................ 9 B. Presidential Elections 2012 ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The View from Abkhazia of South Ossetia Ablaze
    Central Asian Survey Vol. 28, No. 2, June 2009, 235–246 The view from Abkhazia of South Ossetia ablaze Paula Garbà Department of Anthropology, University of California, Irvine, USA The Abkhazian and South Ossetian perspectives on the fighting between Georgians and South Ossetians in August 2008 could not be heard above the noise generated around the geopolitical implications of the larger Russian–Georgian clash. The population of Abkhazia experienced the violence in South Ossetia as though it was occurring on their own territory. This confirmed their complete lack of trust in the Georgian government’s commitment to peaceful resolution of the conflicts. In addition, they were disappointed with what they regarded as the international community’s absence of criticism of Georgia’s actions and lack of concern for the safety and well-being of the South Ossetians. Russia’s recognition of South Ossetia’s and Abkhazia’s independence has taken the question of Georgia’s territorial integrity off the negotiation table indefinitely. It also has set back the formal peace process with both South Ossetia and Abkhazia. An essential way forward, toward establishing trust as a necessary foundation for progress in the political negotiations, would be for the US and other interested countries to engage with the people of Abkhazia and South Ossetia at all levels, demonstrating credible and consistent concern for the safety and well being of all the people affected by the conflict. Keywords: conflict; culture; Abkhazia; South Ossetia Introduction Georgian–Abkhazian official relations since the end of the 1992–1993 war have offered little common ground for a mutually acceptable resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia the Ingush-Ossetian Conflict in the Prigorodnyi Region
    Russia Page 1 of 32 RUSSIA THE INGUSH-OSSETIAN CONFLICT IN THE PRIGORODNYI REGION Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch New York · Washington · London · Brussels Copyright © May 1996 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalogue Number: 96-75960 ISBN: 1-56432-165-7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is based on a trip to the Republic of Ingushetiya, hereafter Ingushetiya, and the Republic of North Ossetia- Alaniya, hereafter North Ossetia, both states of the Russian Federation, from August 11-19, 1994. Until 1994, North Ossetia was the North Ossetian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR), a part of the former Soviet Union. Until 1992, Ingushetiya was part of the Checheno-Ingush Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR), and was also part of the former Soviet Union. Human Rights/Helsinki representatives visited Vladikavkaz, Kartsa, Chermen, Tarskoye, Kurtat, Dachnoye, and Maiskii in North Ossetia and Nazran and Gaziyurt in Ingushetiya. Jeri Laber and Rachel Denber edited the report, and Shira Robinson provided production assistance for its publication. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki thanks both North Ossetian and Ingush authorities as well as officials from the Russian Temporary Administration (now the Temporary State Committee) for their cooperation with the mission participants. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki would like to express our appreciation to all those who read the report and commented on it, including Prof. John Collarusso of McMaster University. We would also like to thank the members of the Russian human rights group Memorial, who provided generous assistance and advice. In 1994 Memorial published an excellent report on the conflict in the Prigorodnyi region, "Two Years after the War: The Problem of the Forcibly Displaced in the Area of the Ossetian-Ingush Conflict." Finally, we would like to thank the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Henry Jackson Fund, the Merck Fund and the Moriah Fund for their support.
    [Show full text]
  • A Balkanist in Daghestan: Annotated Notes from the Field Victor A
    A Balkanist in Daghestan: Annotated Notes from the Field Victor a. Friedman University of Chicago Introduction and Disclaimer The Republic of Daghestan has received very little attention in the West. Chenciner (1997) is the only full-length account in English based on first-hand visits mostly in the late 1980's and early 1990's. Wixman's (1980) excellent study had to be based entirely on secondary sources, and Bennigsen and Wimbush (1986:146-81 et passim), while quite useful, is basically encyclopedic and somewhat dated. Since Daghestan is still difficult to get to, potentially unstable, and only infrequently visited by Western scholars (mostly linguists), I am offering this account of my recent visit there (16-20 June 1998), modestly supplemented by some published materials. My intent is basically informative and impressionistic, and I do not attempt to give complete coverage to many topics worthy of further research. This account does, however, update some items covered in the aforementioned works and makes some observations on Daghestan with respect to language, identity, the political situation, and a comparison with the another unstable, multi-ethnic, identity construction site, i.e., Balkans, particularly Macedonia. Background Daghestan is the third most populous Republic in the Russian Federation (after Bashkortostan and Tatarstan; Osmanov 1986:24). The northern half of its current territory, consisting of the Nogai steppe and the Kizljar region settled in part by Terek Cossacks, was added in 1922, after the fall of the North Caucasian
    [Show full text]
  • Stability in Russia's Chechnya and Other Regions of the North Caucasus: Recent Developments
    Order Code RL34613 Stability in Russia’s Chechnya and Other Regions of the North Caucasus: Recent Developments August 12, 2008 Jim Nichol Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Stability in Russia’s Chechnya and Other Regions of the North Caucasus: Recent Developments Summary In recent years, there have not been major terrorist attacks in Russia’s North Caucasus — a border area between the Black and Caspian Seas that includes the formerly breakaway Chechnya and other ethnic-based regions — on the scale of the June 2004 raid on security offices in the town of Nazran (in Ingushetia), where nearly 100 security personnel and civilians were killed, or the September 2004 attack at the Beslan grade school (in North Ossetia), where 300 or more civilians were killed. This record, in part, might be attributed to government tactics. For instance, the Russian Interior (police) Ministry reported that its troops had conducted over 850 sweep operations (“zachistki”) in 2007 in the North Caucasus, in which they surround a village and search every house, ostensibly in a bid to apprehend terrorists. Critics of the operations allege that the troops frequently engage in pillaging and gratuitous violence and are responsible for kidnapings for ransom and “disappearances” of civilians. Although it appears that major terrorist attacks have abated, there reportedly have been increasingly frequent small-scale attacks against government targets. Additionally, many ethnic Russian and other non-native civilians have been murdered or have disappeared, which has spurred the migration of most of the non- native population from the North Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • Finno-Ugric Republics and Their State Languages: Balancing Powers in Constitutional Order in the Early 1990S
    SUSA/JSFOu 94, 2013 Konstantin ZAMYATIN (Helsinki) Finno-Ugric Republics and Their State Languages: Balancing Powers in Constitutional Order in the Early 1990s Most of Russia’s national republics established titular and Russian as co-official state languages in their constitutions of the early 1990s. There is no consensus on the reasons and consequences of this act, whether it should be seen as a mere symbolic gesture, a measure to ensure a language revival, an instrument in political debate or an ethnic institution. From an institutional and comparative perspective, this study explores the constitutional systems of the Finno-Ugric republics and demonstrates that across the republics, the official status of the state languages was among the few references to ethnicity built into their constitutions. However, only in the case of language require- ments for the top officials, its inclusion could be interpreted as an attempt at instrumen- tally using ethnicity for political ends. Otherwise, constitutional recognition of the state languages should be rather understood as an element of institutionalized ethnicity that remains a potential resource for political mobilization. This latter circumstance might clarify why federal authorities could see an obstacle for their Russian nation-building agenda in the official status of languages. 1. Introduction The period of social transformations of the late 1980s and early 1990s in Eastern Europe was characterized by countries’ transition from the communist administra- tive−command systems towards the representative democracy and market economy. One important driving force of change in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was the rise of popular movements out of national resentment and dissatis- faction with the state-of-the-art in the sphere of inter-ethnic relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Exploitation of Ethnic Issues And
    Imperial Strategies: Russia’s Exploitation of Ethnic Issues and Policy in the Middle East By Stephen Blank Summary Russia has been an empire throughout its history. Accordingly, the mechanisms and practices of imperial management, particularly Russia’s ability to coopt potential elites from minorities with whom it is interacting, have remained central to its political behavior at home and abroad. And it has expanded to create linkages—or what Celeste Wallander has called “trans-imperialism”—between members of Russia’s Islamic population and Middle Eastern elites, e.g. the use of Ramzan Kadyrov as an agent of Moscow in the Middle East. At the same time Russia has also sought expanded investment by Middle Eastern governments in projects aimed at benefitting Russia’s Muslims. But beyond attempting to create these kinds of trans-imperial linkages and coopt Muslims at home and abroad, Russia has actively exploited both domestic and foreign ethno- religious cleavages throughout its history to expand its power, territory, wealth and influence. Vladimir Putin’s regime is no exception, especially in Syria and the wider Middle East. The Kurds furnish a particularly revealing example of how Moscow has exploited these cleavages in Syria, Turkey and Iraq to gain energy rents, strategic access, wealth, and political influence over those governments to enhance its strategic position in Syria. Finally, as long as such opportunities present themselves to Moscow, it is unlikely that it will desist from exploiting this time-honored tactic of imperial aggrandizement and management, even if empire and imperial strategies invariably entail war and risk the security of Putin’s state.
    [Show full text]
  • Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam As a Tool of the Kremlin?
    Notes de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Visions 99 Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam as a Tool of the Kremlin? Marlène LARUELLE March 2017 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the few French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European and broader international debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. This text is published with the support of DGRIS (Directorate General for International Relations and Strategy) under “Observatoire Russie, Europe orientale et Caucase”. ISBN: 978-2-36567-681-6 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2017 How to quote this document: Marlène Laruelle, “Kadyrovism: Hardline Islam as a Tool of the Kremlin?”, Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 99, Ifri, March 2017. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15—FRANCE Tel.: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00—Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Ifri-Bruxelles Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 1000—Brussels—BELGIUM Tel.: +32 (0)2 238 51 10—Fax: +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection dedicated to Russia and the other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan).
    [Show full text]
  • The North Caucasus Region As a Blind Spot in the “European Green Deal”: Energy Supply Security and Energy Superpower Russia
    energies Article The North Caucasus Region as a Blind Spot in the “European Green Deal”: Energy Supply Security and Energy Superpower Russia José Antonio Peña-Ramos 1,* , Philipp Bagus 2 and Dmitri Amirov-Belova 3 1 Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia 7500912, Chile 2 Department of Applied Economics I and History of Economic Institutions (and Moral Philosophy), Rey Juan Carlos University, 28032 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 3 Postgraduate Studies Centre, Pablo de Olavide University, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-657219669 Abstract: The “European Green Deal” has ambitious aims, such as net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. While the European Union aims to make its energies greener, Russia pursues power-goals based on its status as a geo-energy superpower. A successful “European Green Deal” would have the up-to-now underestimated geopolitical advantage of making the European Union less dependent on Russian hydrocarbons. In this article, we illustrate Russian power-politics and its geopolitical implications by analyzing the illustrative case of the North Caucasus, which has been traditionally a strategic region for Russia. The present article describes and analyses the impact of Russian intervention in the North Caucasian secessionist conflict since 1991 and its importance in terms of natural resources, especially hydrocarbons. The geopolitical power secured by Russia in the North Caucasian conflict has important implications for European Union’s energy supply security and could be regarded as a strong argument in favor of the “European Green Deal”. Keywords: North Caucasus; post-soviet conflicts; Russia; oil; natural gas; global economics and Citation: Peña-Ramos, J.A.; Bagus, P.; cross-cultural management; energy studies; renewable energies; energy markets; clean energies Amirov-Belova, D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Agglomeration of Exporters by Destination
    The Agglomeration of Exporters by Destination Andrew J. Casseya aSchool of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, 101 Hulbert Hall, P.O. Box 646210, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. Phone: 509-335-8334. Fax: 509-335-1173. Email: [email protected]. Katherine N. Schmeiserb;∗ bDepartment of Economics, Mt. Holyoke College, 117 Skinner Hall; 50 College St, South Hadley, MA 01075, USA. Phone: 612-910-2538. Email: [email protected]. Abstract Precise characterization of informational trade barriers is neither well documented nor understood, and thus remain a considerable hindrance to development. Using spatial econometrics on Russian customs data, we document that destination-specific export spillovers exist for developing countries, extending a result that was only known for developed countries. This result suggests behavior responding to a destination barrier. To account for this fact, we build on a monopolistic competition model of trade by postulating an externality in the international transaction of goods. We test the model's prediction on region- and state-level exports using Russian and U.S. data. Our model accounts for up to 40% more of the variation than in gravity-type models without agglomeration. This finding has important development implications in that export policy that considers current trade partners may be more effective than policy that focuses only on the exporting country's industries. Keywords: agglomeration, distribution, exports, development, location, Russia JEL: D23, F12, L29 ∗Corresponding author Preprint submitted to. September 21, 2011 1 1. Introduction 2 One of the unsolved problems in economic development is the lack of knowledge about the 3 size and nature of barriers to trade, and how these barriers affect growth and income.
    [Show full text]