Exxon: Denial and Deception

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exxon: Denial and Deception DENIAL AND DECEPTION: A Chronicle of ExxonMobil’s Efforts to Corrupt the Debate on Global Warming A Report by May 2002 Acknowledgements The report was written and researched by Janet Sawin and Kert Davies, using research and reports by Greenpeace United Kingdom, Ross Gelbspan, Kirsty Hamilton and Bill Hare. Special thanks to the Ozone Action files. Greenpeace is grateful to the founda- tions, donors and members who support our global warming campaign. Foreward One way to look at human history is through the peri- experiment on the global climate. We have already odic struggles between those embodying the cor- been provided a glimpse of what happens as global rupting influence of power and those who have kept warming goes unabated, from the loss of low lying such power in check or even successfully under- island nations and beaches the world over, to the mined it. The American Revolution is arguably the spread of infectious diseases, disrupted agriculture, birth of the freedom movement in the Western world, more severe weather cycles including super storms, although the British might argue that the birth of the more droughts, more floods, and ultimately the mas- "rights of man" came from the issuing of the Magna sive die-off of the great forests, the disappearance of Carta and frankly, all cultures can point to great liber- many glaciers, and the further accelerated loss of ators of one era or another. biodiversity. Regardless of where it began, every massive center ExxonMobil’s role in defeating efforts to stop global of unaccountable power, whether it be the Roman warming is impressive. It has included the paying of Catholic Church of the Middle Ages, the city states of skeptic scientists to confuse the public and the lob- Europe or the ideology based governments of the bying and paying of politicians to do nothing – all the last century have all met their match and ultimately way up to the White House. It has included intimi- lost their power when enough people were pushed to dating credible scientists who hold the majority view the breaking point and chose to take back their that global warming is happening and is, in part, driv- inalienable rights. en by humans. All of this history has finally been pulled together into one concise well-documented ExxonMobil is now such a power. Unaccountable to report that reads like it should be turned into a the U.S. Congress, calling out orders to the White screenplay like "Erin Brockovich" and "A Civil House, afoul of countless regulations governing envi- Action." ronmental behavior at all levels of government, pay- ing politicians for favors, and undermining the very But what is most hopeful, despite the frightening reasons American colonists fought for the right to a nature of the report, is that activists the world over "more perfect union." are now looking at ExxonMobil as the key corpora- tion creating the logjam over global warming. Further, As has been documented in the pages that follow in the growing awareness of ExxonMobil’s human rights the latest Greenpeace report: Denial and Deception: A violations around the world, an expanding student Chronicle of ExxonMobil’s Corruption of the Debate on activist movement in the U.S., boycotts in the U.S. Global Warming, ExxonMobil, the world’s second and UK, religious leaders organizing against largest corporation has successfully used its profits ExxonMobil for justice, one thing is certain: a widely to stall efforts to stop the greatest ecological threat distributed, organic campaign is developing against facing the world today – global warming. ExxonMobil that is seeking to reform this corporation on many levels. Corporations that have sought haven in democracies and then used these rights to circumvent, ignore or It remains to be seen just how much pressure for change laws to their whims have come under the positive change will be generated against glare of the modern day freedom fighters. As has ExxonMobil. Its willful acts of arrogance in dealing been documented in this report, ExxonMobil stands with the environmental problems it creates and its out as perhaps the most significant organization on human rights abuses, have made ExxonMobil the Earth pushing civilization headlong into a dangerous most commonly discussed target for reform since the i anti-WTO protests in Seattle. ExxonMobil is now standing in the path of history, which has provided spectacular examples of David beating Goliath, across the 20th century including the movement led by Gandhi to free the Indian people, the U.S. civil rights movement and Solidarity’s defeat of Polish communism. The goliath ExxonMobil may provide the perfect catalyst for much needed reform of cor- porate power. As Ken Cohen, ExxonMobil’s head of government relations and public affairs noted to The Guardian (July 11, 2001), "We know we have a giant target painted on our chests." I have no doubt that ExxonMobil will either fall or reform in due time. Wrongful behavior, whether out of malice or ignorance cannot long stand. The ques- tion, however, remains, will ExxonMobil be stopped before global warming is beyond the point of no return? Only time will tell. In the meantime, Greenpeace will do everything in its power to stop ExxonMobil’s rampant disregard for the planet and its people. This report provides a foundational piece of research to aid in the efforts of activists the world over to kick off the 21st century with either a great reformation or an even greater dissolution of ExxonMobil, the most powerful entity to have sucked the life out of the efforts to stop global warming. There is still time to breathe new life into those efforts once ExxonMobil is cleared from the path. Rave on, John Passacantando Executive Director ii Executive Summary Global warming eclipses all other environmental chal- standing or for further identification of potential solu- lenges of the 21st century. There is undeniable proof tions.”i Conversely said Dahan, ExxonMobil has that pollution from the burning of oil, coal and other “become increasingly convinced that the only sensi- fossil fuels is the root cause of the observed climate ble approach is to take a longer term perspective,” changes to date. Global warming is already occurring, adding that “if warming turns out to be a real prob- with evidence piling up weekly of radical climate dis- lem, will we be willing to shut down the economies of ruption. If left unchecked, the catastrophe of global the industrialized world…?”ii warming threatens to cause weather disasters and climate disruption that will destabilize and destroy This report, Denial and Deception: A Chronicle of ecosystems, economies and societies worldwide. ExxonMobil’s Efforts to Corrupt the Global Warming Debate, details more than a decade of deliberate and Throughout the last decade, ExxonMobil has been persistent efforts by ExxonMobil and its front groups viewed internationally as the number one company to derail the evolving global warming treaty and the driving the ongoing industry campaign to derail the scientific consensus that urgently supports the international agreement to solve global warming. international agreement. The report also delves into While other oil companies are still polluting the envi- emerging ties between the ExxonMobil agenda and ronment and lobbying for pro-oil policies, the damaging global warming legacy of the Bush ExxonMobil epitomizes the worst of corporate administration. America’s onslaught against climate protection. Prior to the 1999 merger, both Exxon and Mobil were lead- Since the early 1990s, Exxon and Mobil have taken ers of American oil industry efforts against global leading roles in industry efforts to cast doubt over cli- warming action. The merger of these two giants truly mate science. With the now defunct Global Climate created what some have called the “Death Star” of Coalition front group and others, ExxonMobil has the global warming debate. claimed that the scientists are getting it wrong on global warming and the role of fossil fuels. This ongo- ExxonMobil and their allies have long spearheaded a ing effort was spawned by the revelations of the first corporate war against environmental regulations that report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate threaten to control the negative attributes of their Change (IPCC) in 1990, which pointed to strong and core business – fossil fuel exploitation and use. They growing evidence of temperature rise, sea level rise give millions of dollars to political campaigns and and other changes resulting from rising emissions of candidates and spend millions more on lobbyists and carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases. advertisements in order to achieve policies that allow That report stressed the need for a 60 to 80 percent them to act with impunity. As a result of this effort cut in CO2 emissions just to stabilize rising atmos- they get large financial payback in the form of gov- pheric concentrations of this greenhouse gas. This ernment subsidies, tax breaks, and access to public call for emission cuts was received by Exxon, Mobil lands. and others as a direct attack on their core business. ExxonMobil continues to stall the debate. In early ExxonMobil’s campaign to slow the progress of sci- May, René Dahan, the Director and Executive Vice entific validation of global warming started with the President of ExxonMobil, speaking at the G-8 Energy use of paid skeptic scientists to publicly rebut scien- Ministers meeting in Detroit, stated that “with regard tific advances. Exxon has also actively engaged in to potential climate change, some people have manipulation of international scientific assessments. decided not to wait for additional scientific under- In 1998, Exxon was involved in developing a $6 mil- iii lion American Petroleum Institute communications getting ‘off the hook’ by not having to cut their emis- plan for a two-year campaign intended to reshape sions.
Recommended publications
  • Global Climate Coalition
    Log in Page Discussion Read View source View history Search SourceWatch HELP CMD SHINE A LIGHT ON What Is CMD? CORRUPTION! Donate Here ALEC Exposed Outsourcing America Thanks to a $50,000 challenge grant, your gift will be matched 1- Exposed Koch Exposed to-1, so every dollar you give today will go twice as far! FrackSwarm CoalSwarm NFIB Exposed GIVE TODAY! Fix the Debt State Policy Network Recent Changes Global Climate Coalition Random page The Global Climate Coalition (GCC) was one of the most outspoken How To and confrontational industry groups in the United States battling Learn more from the Sign Up to Edit Center for Media and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Prior to its disbanding in early Democracy's research Contact Us 2002, it collaborated extensively with a network that included industry on climate change. Help Write History Research Corporations trade associations, "property rights" groups affiliated with the anti- Edit an Article environmental Wise Use movement, and fringe groups such as Correct Errors This article is Sovereignty International, which believes that global warming is a plot to part of the Search Effectively enslave the world under a United Nations-led "world government." Center for Media Find FAQs & Democracy's Explore Our Index Contents spotlight on front groups and Blow the Whistle 1 Personnel corporate spin. Find the Home Page 2 History Other Info 3 Excerpts from the GCC web site 4 Funding About SourceWatch About PRWatch 5 Internal Documents Search Categories 6 Case Studies Random Article 7 Contact Information 8 Other SourceWatch Related Resources Other Policies 9 External links Ground Rules Disclaimers Copyright Info Personnel Ads Glenn Kelly, Executive Director Gail McDonald, President William O'Keefe, Chairman, an executive for the American Petroleum Institute Tools Frank Maisano, Media Contact, is a member of the Potomac Communications Group, whose other clients What links here include Con Edison, the Edison Electric Institute, the Nuclear Energy Institute, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Locks in the New Narrative
    7. Influences on a changed story and the new normal: media locks in the new narrative It was the biggest, most powerful spin campaign in Australian media history—the strategy was to delay action on greenhouse gas emissions until ‘coal was ready’—with geo-sequestration (burying carbon gases) and tax support. Alan Tate, ABC environment reporter 1990s On 23 September 2013 the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) program Media Watch explored a textbook example of why too many Australians and their politicians continue to stumble through a fog of confusion and doubt in regard to climate change. The case under the microscope typified irresponsible journalism. Media Watch host Paul Barry, with trademark irony, announced: ‘Yes it’s official at last … those stupid scientists on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] got it wrong’, in their latest assessment report. He quoted 2GB breakfast jock Chris Smith from a week earlier saying the IPCC had ‘fessed up’ that its computers had drastically overestimated rising temperatures. ‘That’s a relief,’ said Barry, and how do we know this? ‘Because Chris Smith read it on the front page of last Monday’s Australian newspaper. When it comes to rubbishing the dangers of man-made global warming the shock jocks certainly know who they can trust.’ But wait. The Australian’s story by Environment Editor Graham Lloyd—‘We got it wrong on warming says IPCC’ was not original either. According to Media Watch, Lloyd appeared to have based his story on a News Limited sister publication from the United Kingdom. Said Barry: ‘He’d read all about it in the previous day’s Mail on Sunday,’ which had a story headlined ‘The great green con’.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Blue Planet Prize Awards Ceremony and Congratulatory Party
    ASAHI GLASS FOUNDATION NEWS January 2011 News No.40 2nd Floor, Science Plaza, 5-3, Yonbancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0081, Japan Tel.: +81 3 5275 0620 Fax: +81 3 5275 0871 URL http://www.af-info.or.jp/en/index.html E-MAIL [email protected] 2010 Blue Planet Prize Awards Ceremony and Congratulatory Party he Asahi Glass Foundation awarded the 19th annual blue planet for future generations, by offering thoughts on TBlue Planet Prize at the ceremony held at Tokyo the blessings of Earth, the planet of life. The presentation Kaikan on October 26, 2010. The recipients of the award was followed by introductory remarks from Mr. Tetsuji this year were Dr. James Hansen of the United States and Tanaka, Chairman of the Foundation, a report on the Dr. Robert Watson of the United Kingdom. One of the selection procedures, and an introduction of the award first scientists to predict global warming, Dr. Hansen has winners by Dr. Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, Chairman of the long warned that it would very probably cause destructive Selection Committee. results for life on Earth. He has called on governments and emarks from Prince Akishino were followed by a the public to take immediate action to reduce and mitigate Rcongratulatory message from Prime Minister Naoto the impact of climate change. Dr. Watson organized the Kan, read by Mr. Kazuo Matsunaga, Vice-Minister of famous scientific project to derive scientific evidence on the Economy, Trade and Industry. As representatives of the depletion of the ozone layer, and ultimately endorsed the native countries of the recipients, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Climate Coalition Primer on Climate Change Science
    ~ ~ Chairman F.SOHWAB Poraohe TECH-96-29 1st Viae C".lrrn.n C. MAZZA 1/18/96 Hyundal 2nd Vic. Ohalrrnan C. SMITH Toyota P S_cret.ry C. HELFMAN TO: AIAM Technical Committee BMW Treasurer .,J.AMESTOY Mazda FROM: Gregory J. Dana Vice President and Technical Director BMW c ••woo Flat RE: GLOBAL CLIMATE COALITION-(GCC)· Primer on Honda Hyundal Climate Change Science· Final Draft lauzu Kia , Land Rover Enclosed is a primer on global climate change science developed by the Mazda Mlt8ublehl GCC. If any members have any comments on this or other GCC NIB.an documents that are mailed out, please provide me with your comments to Peugeot forward to the GCC. Poreche Renault RolI&-Aoyoe S ••b GJD:ljf ""al'"u .z.ukl Toyota VOlkswagen Volvo President P. HUTOHINSON ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS. INC. 1001 19TH ST. NORTH. SUITE 1200 • ARLINGTON, VA 22209. TELEPHONE 703.525.7788. FAX 703.525.8817 AIAM-050771 Mobil Oil Corporation ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY DEPARTh4ENT P.O. BOX1031 PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 08543-1031 December 21, 1995 'To; Members ofGCC-STAC Attached is what I hope is the final draft ofthe primer onglobal climate change science we have been working on for the past few months. It has been revised to more directly address recent statements from IPCC Working Group I and to reflect comments from John Kinsman and Howard Feldman. We will be discussing this draft at the January 18th STAC meeting. Ifyou are coming to that meeting, please bring any additional comments on the draft with you. Ifyou have comments but are unable to attend the meeting, please fax them to Eric Holdsworth at the GeC office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greenhouse Effect
    The Greenhouse Effect I. SUMMARY AND OVERVIEWa This chapter examines what is variously called “climate change,” “global warming” and the “Greenhouse Effect.” These are all names for the same phenomenon: an increase in the Earth's temperature when heat is trapped near the surface. Most of this trapping is due to natural constituents of the air—water vapor, for example. But air pollutants also can trap heat, and as their concentrations increased so, too, can the Earth's temperature. Energy enters the Earth's atmosphere as sunlight. It strikes the surface, where it is converted into infrared radiation. Although the atmosphere is largely transparent to the visible radiation spectrum—sunlight—it is not to the infrared range. So heat that would other radiate into space is instead trapped in the atmosphere. That heat-trapping effect is good fortune for humanity and other life currently on Earth, because it raises the average temperature roughly 33 degrees Celsius above what it otherwise would be, making life as we know it possible.1 Over time, the energy entering the air has reached equilibrium with the energy leaving, creating Earth's current climate and, with it, the weather with which we are familiar on a day-to- day, week-to-week or year-to-year basis. With a Greenhouse Effect either greater or less than what has prevailed for millennia, the Earth would be quite different. In the absence of a Greenhouse Effect, the Earth would be ice covered. What it would be like with an enhanced Greenhouse Effect is the subject of this discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 8.71 MB, for February 01, 2017 Appendix In
    Case 4:16-cv-00469-K Document 175 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID 5923 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, § § Plaintiff, § v. § No. 4:16-CV-469-K § ERIC TRADD SCHNEIDERMAN, § Attorney General of New York, in his § official capacity, and MAURA TRACY § HEALEY, Attorney General of § Massachusetts, in her official capacity, § § Defendants. § APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THIS COURT’S PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE DEFENDANTS Exhibit Description Page(s) N/A Declaration of Justin Anderson (Feb. 1, 2017) v – ix A Transcript of the AGs United for Clean Power App. 1 –App. 21 Press Conference, held on March 29, 2016, which was prepared by counsel based on a video recording of the event. The video recording is available at http://www.ag.ny.gov/press- release/ag-schneiderman-former-vice-president- al-gore-and-coalition-attorneys-general-across B E-mail from Wendy Morgan, Chief of Public App. 22 – App. 32 Protection, Office of the Vermont Attorney General to Michael Meade, Director, Intergovernmental Affairs Bureau, Office of the New York Attorney General (Mar. 18, 2016, 6:06 PM) C Union of Concerned Scientists, Peter Frumhoff, App. 33 – App. 37 http://www.ucsusa.org/about/staff/staff/peter- frumhoff.html#.WI-OaVMrLcs (last visited Jan. 20, 2017, 2:05 PM) Case 4:16-cv-00469-K Document 175 Filed 02/01/17 Page 2 of 10 PageID 5924 Exhibit Description Page(s) D Union of Concerned Scientists, Smoke, Mirrors & App.
    [Show full text]
  • Exxon Mobile and British Petroleum: a Tale of Two Companies Or Just Business As Usual?
    Exxon Mobile and British Petroleum: A tale of two companies or just business as usual? NRE 501: Climate Change—A Move to Action April 23, 2008 SUSAN LORENZ MARK RABINSKY JEN WURTZEL Executive Summary Heavy global fossil fuel reliance combined with high oil prices and a dwindling supply is creating complex political, environmental and social issues. Growing awareness of climate change impacts is initiating climate planning and action for many governments and organizations. The oil industry has a unique position in addressing climate change, as oil when combusted in the use phase by consumers, emits significant GHGs. Responses to this global issue vary between many of the large, multi- national oil companies. This analysis will focus on the climate responses of two of these organizations, British Petroleum (BP), and Exxon Mobil (Exxon) that in comparison to other oil companies have distinct and changing positions on climate change. BP is considered the first oil company to publicly acknowledge climate change, and has a record for precautionary action that stretches back to 1997.1 BP has utilized this position on climate change to re-brand the organization with a new slogan, ‘Beyond Petroleum,’ which is focusing on alternative fuels and other types of renewable energy development. Exxon recognizes that there is scientific evidence for a warming earth. Exxon also communicates that climate science is complex and uncertain but associated risks could prove to be significant for humans and ecosystems.2 Precautionary action may make sense, but in developing and implementing strategies that reduce GHGs, the central importance of energy to the global economy needs to be a component.3 The following analysis will look at climate change impacts of the oil sector, the research focus areas of BP and Exxon, the rhetoric used by both companies in addressing climate change, stakeholder influences and will also provide recommendations on addressing climate change for the oil industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhouse Gangsters Vs. Climate Justice in Bulk and Distribute It Through Your Community, Activist Networks, Co-Workers and Friends
    Greenhouse Gangsters Published by TRAC Transnational Resource vs. Climate Justice and Action Center Greenhouse Gangsters* vs. Climate Justice Contents 1 Introduction: Oil’s Injustices • Defining Climate Justice 6 Part 1: The Most Powerful Industry on Earth • Size Matters • Getting Their Way • Oil, Globalization and Climate Change 11 Part 2: The Corporate Response: The Five “Ds”: Deny, Delay, Divide, Dump, Dupe 22 Part 3: A Platform for Climate Justice • Remove the Causes of Global Warming • Oppose the Destructive Impacts of Oil Locally and Globally • Forge Just Solutions Between and Within Nations • Reverse Corporate-led, Fossil Fuel-Based Globalization. Sidebars 3 What is Climate Justice? 4-5 The Basics: What is Climate Change? 8 Other Corporate Climate Culprits—Car, Coal, Utilities 17 Global Warming and Global Equity 19 The World Bank’s Climate Hypocrisy 21 Hydrocarbons and Human Rights 24 No New Exploration 27 End Notes *The American Heritage Dictionary definition of gangster is “an organized group of criminals.” The history of big oil’s collusion, price fixing, transfer pricing, environmental crimes, complicity in human rights violations and most recently, concerted efforts to undermine initiatives to address global warming, effectively stealing our children’s future, eminently qualifies them as such. Written by Kenny Bruno, Joshua Karliner and Published by TRAC—Transnational Resource & Action Center China Brotsky Transnational Resource and Action Center PO Box 29344 Kenny Bruno is a Research Associate with TRAC. San Francisco, CA 94129-0344 USA He also works with Earthrights International Tel: (415) 561-6568 e-mail: [email protected] (ERI), on human rights and environment issues. Kenny worked with Greenpeace for more than TRAC works to build global links for human twelve years on a variety of domestic and interna- rights, environmental justice and democratic tional toxics issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing Climate Change Denial in the United States and Looking for Impacts on the United States’ Science Diplomacy
    CENTRE INTERNATIONAL DE FORMATION EUROPEENNE SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUT EUROPEEN · EUROPEAN INSTITUTE Tracing Climate Change Denial in the United States and Looking for Impacts on the United States’ Science Diplomacy By Stephanie Baima A thesis submitted for the Joint Master degree in Global Economic Governance & Public Affairs (GEGPA) Academic year 2019 – 2020 July 2020 Supervisor: Hartmut Marhold Reviewer: Christian Blasberg PLAGIARISM STATEMENT I certify that this thesis is my own work, based on my personal study and/or research and that I have acknowledged all material and sources used in its preparation. I further certify that I have not copied or used any ideas or formulations from any book, article or thesis, in printed or electronic form, without specifically mentioning their origin, and that the complete citations are indicated in quotation marks. I also certify that this thesis has not previously been submitted for assessment in any other unit, except where specific permission has been granted from all unit coordinators involved, and that I have not copied in part or whole or otherwise plagiarized the work of other students and/or persons. In accordance with the law, failure to comply with these regulations makes me liable to prosecution by the disciplinary commission and the courts of the French Republic for university plagiarism. Stephanie Baima 10 July 2020 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ 3 Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • Future Directions for Scientific Advice in Whitehall
    FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR SCIENTIFIC ADVICE IN WHITEHALL Edited by Robert Doubleday and James Wilsdon April 2013 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 Acknowledgements 4 Hail to the Chief: future directions for scientific advice 7 James Wilsdon and Robert Doubleday 1 EXPERTS AND EVIDENCE IN WHITEHALL 21 The science and art of effective advice 22 John Beddington Experts and experimental government 32 Geoff Mulgan A better formula: will Civil Service reform improve Whitehall’s 39 use of expert advice? Jill Rutter Making the most of scientists and engineers in government 49 Miles Parker Civil Service identity, evidence and policy 56 Dave O’Brien 2 THE DISCIPLINARY MIX 61 The science of science advice 62 Sheila Jasanoff The case for a Chief Social Scientist 69 Cary Cooper and Stephen Anderson Engineering policy: evidence, advice and execution 73 Brian Collins The benefits of hindsight: how history can contribute to science policy 79 Rebekah Higgitt and James Wilsdon 3 NETWORKS, PUBLICS AND POLICY 86 Networks, nodes and nonlinearity: how scientific advice gets into policy 87 David Cleevely Windows or doors? Experts, publics and open policy 92 Jack Stilgoe and Simon Burall The power of ‘you’: expertise below the line 100 Alice Bell The politics of posterity: expertise and long-range decision making 106 Natalie Day Scientific advice in Parliament 115 Chris Tyler 4 CREDIBILITY ACROSS CULTURES 121 Letter from America: a memo to Sir Mark Walport 122 Roger Pielke Jr. The crowded chasm: science in the Australian government 134 Paul Harris Lessons from the IPCC: do scientific assessments need to be 142 consensual to be authoritative? Mike Hulme Science advice at the global scale 148 Bob Watson 4 FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR SCIENTIFIC ADVICE IN WHITEHALL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Some projects have a long and painful gestation; others fall into place with remarkable ease.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Issue (2.1MB)
    journal The Journal of The Foundation for Science and Technology fstVolume 22 Number 5 July 2019 www.foundation.org.uk Editorial Gavin Costigan: Addressing the complex issues facing society Reducing carbon emissions Nick Bridge: Delivering the goals of the Paris Agreement Professor Qi Ye: Beyond the current climate process Baroness Bryony Worthington: Moving the process forward Emma Howard Boyd: Taking practical steps Professor Nick Robins: The third goal of the Agreement Tackling the risk of pandemic flu Professor Chris Whitty: Preparing against a flu pandemic Dr Andrew Coburn: Examining the impacts on society Professor Rachel McKendry: The digital component The National Risk Register of Civil Emergencies Technology and the law Sir Geoffrey Vos: Employing technology to improve the delivery of justice Susan Acland-Hood: Adopting new technology for a modern justice system Professor Richard Susskind: Upgrading the justice system Research and development Looking to the future Civil society A vision for the next decade COUNCIL AND TRUSTEES VICE-PRESIDENTS CHIEF EXECUTIVE The Earl of Selborne GBE FRS Gavin Costigan Dr Dougal Goodman OBE FREng COUNCIL AND TRUSTEE BOARD Chair Professor Polina Bayvel CBE FRS FREng The Rt Hon the Lord Willetts* FRS Sir John Beddington CMG FRS FRSE HonFREng Deputy Chair Mr Justice Birss The Baroness O’Neill of Bengarve* CH CBE FBA FRS FMedSci Sir Drummond Bone FRSE Professor Sir Leszek Borysiewicz FRS FRCP FMedSci FLSW DL President, The Royal Society The Lord Broers FRS FREng HonFMedSci Sir Venki Ramakrishnan PRS
    [Show full text]
  • Nieman Reports Winter 2005 Vol. 59 No. 4
    N R NIEMAN REPORTS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 59 NO. 4 WINTER 2005 Five Dollars Citizen Journalism Words & Reflections Intelligent Design Global Warming Hurricane Katrina Coverage “… to promote and elevate the standards of journalism” —Agnes Wahl Nieman, the benefactor of the Nieman Foundation. Vol. 59 No. 4 NIEMAN REPORTS Winter 2005 THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY Publisher Bob Giles Editor Melissa Ludtke Assistant Editor Lois Fiore Editorial Assistant Sarah Hagedorn Design Editor Diane Novetsky Nieman Reports (USPS #430-650) is published Editorial in March, June, September and December Telephone: 617-496-6308 by the Nieman Foundation at Harvard University, E-Mail Address: One Francis Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138-2098. [email protected] Subscriptions/Business Internet Address: Telephone: 617-496-2968 www.nieman.harvard.edu E-Mail Address: [email protected] Copyright 2005 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Subscription $20 a year, $35 for two years; add $10 per year for foreign airmail. Single copies $5. Second-class postage paid at Boston, Back copies are available from the Nieman office. Massachusetts and additional entries. Please address all subscription correspondence to POSTMASTER: One Francis Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138-2098 Send address changes to and change of address information to Nieman Reports, P.O. Box 4951, Manchester, NH 03108. P.O. Box 4951, ISSN Number 0028-9817 Manchester, NH 03108. Vol. 59 No. 4 NIEMAN REPORTS Winter 2005 THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY 4 Citizen Journalism 6 The Future Is Here, But Do News Media Companies See It? BY SHAYNE BOWMAN AND CHRIS WILLIS 11 Where Citizens and Journalists Intersect BY DAN GILLMOR 13 Citizen Journalism and the BBC BY RICHARD SAMBROOK 16 With Citizens’ Visual News Coverage Standards Don’t Change BY SANTIAGO LYON AND LOU FERRARA 17 Journalism as a Conversation BY JEAN K.
    [Show full text]