Organizing and Outlining Your Speech Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Organizing and Outlining Your Speech Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning Organizing 8 and Outlining Your Speech Read it • The Parts of a Speech 146 • Putting Your Ideas Together: • Organizing the Body of Your Speech 146 The Complete-Sentence Outline 160 • Connecting Your Ideas with Transitions 158 • Sample Complete-Sentence Outline for Review and Analysis 165 Watch it • Reviewing Patterns of Organization 157 Linking Effectively: Transitions 161 • ge Learning ge gag ng Cengage Learning Cengage Cen Cen Use it • Everything in Its Place 157 Polite to Point 161 • Cengage Learning Review it • Directory of Study and Review Resources 168 Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. Ch008.indd 144 07/10/10 6:53 PM hen you organize a speech well, audience members follow Wyour ideas more easily and better understand what you have to say. In addition, good organization helps you stay on track, keeping your purpose and thesis in mind. With a thoughtful plan for the order in which you want to present your points, you’ll feel more confi dent. Organizing your speech is like planning a trip: Reaching your destination is much less stressful when you know how to get there. In addition, when your speech is well organized, audience members don’t need to worry about where you are in your speech, where you’ve been, or where you’re going. Carefully organizing your speech increases the chances that you’ll achieve your specifi c purpose and that your audience will respond as you’d planned. Andersen Ross /Getty images 145 Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. Ch008.indd 145 07/10/10 6:53 PM Figure 8.1 The parts of a speech Introduction Body Conclusion get audience’s transition from first main point transition from body review main points attention introduction to body and last main point and first main point subpoint to conclusion reinforce purpose indicate purpose subpoint and thesis provide closure transition to second establish credibility main point preview main points second main point subpoint subpoint transition to third main point third main point subpoint subpoint The Parts of a Speech Every speech has four main parts: introduction, body, transitions, and conclusion (Figure 8.1). In the fi rst part of the speech, the introduction, the speaker must get the audience’s attention, indicate the purpose and thesis, establish credibility, and preview the speech’s main points. Th e body of a speech includes all the speaker’s main points and subordinate points. Speakers use transitions, words, phrases, sentences, or paragraphs to move from the introduction to the body, from one point to the next, and from the body to the conclusion. Th e conclusion ends the speech, with the speaker reviewing the main points, restating the thesis, and providing closure. When you present a speech, you proceed from the introduction through the body to the conclusion. But when you put together a speech you typically develop the body and transitions fi rst, the introduction second, and the conclusion last. Figure 8.1 shows the logic underlying this seemingly illogical order. You need to know what you’re going to say in the body before you develop the introduction and the conclusion. You may fi nd, however, that as you work on the body of your speech you’ll think of something you want to say in the introduction or get an idea for a great way to end your speech. Organizing your speech, like speechmaking in general, doesn’t always follow a linear path. Th is chapter focuses on developing the body of your speech and connecting your points together, as those are the starting points for most speakers. Chapter 9 discusses how to begin and end your speech. Organizing the Body of Your Speech Th e body is where the action of your speech takes place—where you inform, persuade, The middle and main part of a speech; or entertain your audience. Th is section identifi es and describes the main elements of includes main and subordinate points. this part of your speech (Figure 8.2). Developing Your Main Points Your working outline provides a useful guide for developing your main points (Chapter 4). Th e working outline includes your topic, general purpose, specifi c purpose, thesis, and keywords for the main ideas and subpoints. As you review your working outline, applying the principles of clarity, relevance, and balance will help you identify what points to include and what points to leave out of your speech. 146 PART 2 DEVELOPING AND RESEARCHING YOUR SPEECH Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. Ch008.indd 146 07/10/10 6:54 PM Clarity Your main points should identify for your audience what your speech Figure 8.2 Elements of the body is about and the response you seek. Th ey must also clearly support your specifi c purpose and be consistent with your thesis. In the following example, notice how the main points elaborate on the ideas expressed in the thesis, providing clarity on Body the topic of happiness. Th ey also support the specifi c purpose, allowing the speaker to reach the goal of informing the audience. first main point Topic: A Scientifi c Approach to Happiness General purpose: To inform subpoint sub-subpoint Specifi c purpose: To inform my audience about the science of happiness. sub-subpoint subpoint Th esis: According to scientists, people achieve happiness sub-subpoint through involvement with daily activities and other sub-subpoint people, contributing in meaningful ways to larger goals, and fi nding pleasure in everyday life. transition to second main point Main points: I. The first component of happiness is being engaged in activities and interacting with others. second main point II. The second component of happiness is feeling like what you do contributes in meaningful ways to some larger goal or objective. subpoint sub-subpoint sub-subpoint III. The third component of happiness is simply finding pleasure in the subpoint everyday things you do. sub-subpoint sub-subpoint Even slightly altering what you want to say about a topic changes the specifi c purpose and thesis. In turn, the main points must also change to clearly refl ect transition to third diff erent focus. For example: main point Topic: Th e Myths of Happiness General purpose: To inform third main point Specifi c purpose: To make my audience aware of myths about happiness. subpoint Th esis: Scientists have dispelled three common myths about sub-subpoint sub-subpoint happiness: Money makes you happy, intelligence subpoint sub-subpoint makes you happy, and being young makes you happy. sub-subpoint Main points: I. “Wealth makes you happy” is one myth scientists have proven false. II. “Greater intelligence makes you happier” is a second myth scientists have proven false. III. “Youth as the key to happiness” is a third myth scientists have dispelled. These examples of two approaches to the same topic, happiness, demonstrate the importance of the early steps you take in topic development: clearly refining your topic, phrasing your specific purpose, and writing your thesis statement (Chapter 4). Relevance Th e main points of your speech must pertain directly to your topic. As you research your topic, you’ll gather more information than you’ll use in your speech. Continually review your specifi c purpose and thesis, and identify the points that are truly relevant to your specifi c purpose. You’ll always know more about your topic than what you include in your speech—you’re the expert—but avoid including information that would detract from your goal. Main points must be relevant to one another as well as to the topic. Consider the main points for this informative speech about U.S. science fi ction writer Octavia E. Butler: Topic: Th e Achievements of Octavia E. Butler General purpose: To inform 147 Chapter 8 Organizing and Outlining Your Speech Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. Ch008.indd 147 07/10/10 6:54 PM Specifi c purpose: To increase my audience’s awareness of some of Octavia E. Butler’s important achievements. Th esis: Octavia E. Butler’s many achievements include winning two Hugo and two Nebula awards, a MacArthur genius grant, and a lifetime achievement award from the PEN American Center.
Recommended publications
  • Argumentation and Fallacies in Creationist Writings Against Evolutionary Theory Petteri Nieminen1,2* and Anne-Mari Mustonen1
    Nieminen and Mustonen Evolution: Education and Outreach 2014, 7:11 http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/7/1/11 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Argumentation and fallacies in creationist writings against evolutionary theory Petteri Nieminen1,2* and Anne-Mari Mustonen1 Abstract Background: The creationist–evolutionist conflict is perhaps the most significant example of a debate about a well-supported scientific theory not readily accepted by the public. Methods: We analyzed creationist texts according to type (young earth creationism, old earth creationism or intelligent design) and context (with or without discussion of “scientific” data). Results: The analysis revealed numerous fallacies including the direct ad hominem—portraying evolutionists as racists, unreliable or gullible—and the indirect ad hominem, where evolutionists are accused of breaking the rules of debate that they themselves have dictated. Poisoning the well fallacy stated that evolutionists would not consider supernatural explanations in any situation due to their pre-existing refusal of theism. Appeals to consequences and guilt by association linked evolutionary theory to atrocities, and slippery slopes to abortion, euthanasia and genocide. False dilemmas, hasty generalizations and straw man fallacies were also common. The prevalence of these fallacies was equal in young earth creationism and intelligent design/old earth creationism. The direct and indirect ad hominem were also prevalent in pro-evolutionary texts. Conclusions: While the fallacious arguments are irrelevant when discussing evolutionary theory from the scientific point of view, they can be effective for the reception of creationist claims, especially if the audience has biases. Thus, the recognition of these fallacies and their dismissal as irrelevant should be accompanied by attempts to avoid counter-fallacies and by the recognition of the context, in which the fallacies are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinn-R Team Has a New Member Working on the Source Code: Wel- Come Huashan Chen
    Editus eBook Series Editus eBooks is a series of electronic books aimed at students and re- searchers of arts and sciences in general. Tinn-R Editor (2010 1. ed. Rmetrics) Tinn-R Editor - GUI forR Language and Environment (2014 2. ed. Editus) José Cláudio Faria Philippe Grosjean Enio Galinkin Jelihovschi Ricardo Pietrobon Philipe Silva Farias Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz GOVERNO DO ESTADO DA BAHIA JAQUES WAGNER - GOVERNADOR SECRETARIA DE EDUCAÇÃO OSVALDO BARRETO FILHO - SECRETÁRIO UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE SANTA CRUZ ADÉLIA MARIA CARVALHO DE MELO PINHEIRO - REITORA EVANDRO SENA FREIRE - VICE-REITOR DIRETORA DA EDITUS RITA VIRGINIA ALVES SANTOS ARGOLLO Conselho Editorial: Rita Virginia Alves Santos Argollo – Presidente Andréa de Azevedo Morégula André Luiz Rosa Ribeiro Adriana dos Santos Reis Lemos Dorival de Freitas Evandro Sena Freire Francisco Mendes Costa José Montival Alencar Junior Lurdes Bertol Rocha Maria Laura de Oliveira Gomes Marileide dos Santos de Oliveira Raimunda Alves Moreira de Assis Roseanne Montargil Rocha Silvia Maria Santos Carvalho Copyright©2015 by JOSÉ CLÁUDIO FARIA PHILIPPE GROSJEAN ENIO GALINKIN JELIHOVSCHI RICARDO PIETROBON PHILIPE SILVA FARIAS Direitos desta edição reservados à EDITUS - EDITORA DA UESC A reprodução não autorizada desta publicação, por qualquer meio, seja total ou parcial, constitui violação da Lei nº 9.610/98. Depósito legal na Biblioteca Nacional, conforme Lei nº 10.994, de 14 de dezembro de 2004. CAPA Carolina Sartório Faria REVISÃO Amek Traduções Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) T591 Tinn-R Editor – GUI for R Language and Environment / José Cláudio Faria [et al.]. – 2. ed. – Ilhéus, BA : Editus, 2015. xvii, 279 p. ; pdf Texto em inglês.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 6: Reporting Likelihood Ratios Components
    Section 6: Reporting Likelihood Ratios Components • Hierarchy of propositions • Formulating propositions • Communicating LRs Section 6 Slide 2 Likelihood Ratio The LR assigns a numerical value in favor or against one propo- sition over another: Pr(EjHp;I) LR = ; Pr(EjHd;I) where Hp typically aligns with the prosecution case, Hd is a reasonable alternative consistent with the defense case, and I is the relevant background information. Section 6 Slide 3 Setting Propositions • The value for the LR will depend on the propositions chosen: different sets of propositions will lead to different LRs. • Choosing the appropriate pair of propositions can therefore be just as important as the DNA analysis itself. Section 6 Slide 4 Hierarchy of Propositions Evett & Cook (1998) established the following hierarchy of propositions: Level Scale Example III Offense Hp: The suspect raped the complainant. Hd: Some other person raped the complainant. II Activity Hp: The suspect had intercourse with the complainant. Hd: Some other person had intercourse with the complainant. I Source Hp: The semen came from the suspect. Hd: The semen came from an unknown person. 0 Sub-source Hp: The DNA in the sample came from the suspect. Hd: The DNA in the sample came from an unknown person. Section 6 Slide 5 Hierarchy of Propositions • The offense level deals with the ultimate issue of guilt/ innocence, which are outside the domain of the forensic scientist. • The activity level associates a DNA profile or evidence source with the crime itself, and there may be occasions where a scientist can address this level. • The source level associates a DNA profile or evidence item with a particular body fluid or individual source.
    [Show full text]
  • We Let Bill Cosby Into Our Homes, So He Owes Us an Explanation
    9/30/2015 We Let Bill Cosby Into Our Homes, So He Owes Us an Explanation We Let Bill Cosby Into Our Homes, So He Owes Us an Explanation KEVIN COKLEY NOVEMBER 20, 2014 America's once-favorite TV dad needs to take his own advice. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke) Entertainer and former classmate Bill Cosby speaks during a public memorial service for Philadelphia Inquirer co-owner Lewis Katz Wednesday, June 4, 2014, at Temple University in Philadelphia. hile the natural inclination is to separate Bill Cosby’s television character W from his real life persona, the show we remember so fondly was not called The Huxtable Show. It was The Cosby Show. We did not really welcome Heathcliff into our homes. We welcomed Bill. http://prospect.org/article/we­let­bill­cosby­our­homes­so­he­owes­us­explanation 1/4 9/30/2015 We Let Bill Cosby Into Our Homes, So He Owes Us an Explanation It is Cosby, the accused serial rapist of 15 women from whom we await an explanation. He has the time: His planned NBC project was just pulled in the face of these resurfaced allegations. He won’t be cashing any residual checks from shows streamed on Netflix because like any contagion, everything Cosby is associated with is now contaminated. This reckoning particularly stings because of Cosby’s decades-long campaign of respectability politics within the black community. This reckoning particularly stings because of Cosby’s decades-long campaign of respectability politics within the black community. For years he has offered a socially conservative critique of certain elements of black culture, where he has emphasized individual responsibility and a pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps mentality.
    [Show full text]
  • False Dilemma Wikipedia Contents
    False dilemma Wikipedia Contents 1 False dilemma 1 1.1 Examples ............................................... 1 1.1.1 Morton's fork ......................................... 1 1.1.2 False choice .......................................... 2 1.1.3 Black-and-white thinking ................................... 2 1.2 See also ................................................ 2 1.3 References ............................................... 3 1.4 External links ............................................. 3 2 Affirmative action 4 2.1 Origins ................................................. 4 2.2 Women ................................................ 4 2.3 Quotas ................................................. 5 2.4 National approaches .......................................... 5 2.4.1 Africa ............................................ 5 2.4.2 Asia .............................................. 7 2.4.3 Europe ............................................ 8 2.4.4 North America ........................................ 10 2.4.5 Oceania ............................................ 11 2.4.6 South America ........................................ 11 2.5 International organizations ...................................... 11 2.5.1 United Nations ........................................ 12 2.6 Support ................................................ 12 2.6.1 Polls .............................................. 12 2.7 Criticism ............................................... 12 2.7.1 Mismatching ......................................... 13 2.8 See also
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Freebsd
    The Complete FreeBSD® If you find errors in this book, please report them to Greg Lehey <grog@Free- BSD.org> for inclusion in the errata list. The Complete FreeBSD® Fourth Edition Tenth anniversary version, 24 February 2006 Greg Lehey The Complete FreeBSD® by Greg Lehey <[email protected]> Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1999, 2002, 2003, 2006 by Greg Lehey. This book is licensed under the Creative Commons “Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5” license. The full text is located at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/legalcode. You are free: • to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work • to make derivative works under the following conditions: • Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor. • Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This clause is modified from the original by the provision: You may use this book for commercial purposes if you pay me the sum of USD 20 per copy printed (whether sold or not). You must also agree to allow inspection of printing records and other material necessary to confirm the royalty sums. The purpose of this clause is to make it attractive to negotiate sensible royalties before printing. • Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one. • For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. • Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON's RESPONSE to the LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an Examination
    ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an examination of gender, politics, and media during the time of the Lewinsky scandal, this project shows that conversations about the first lady shifted throughout 1998. Just after the allegations were made public, the press and American people fought against the forthright position that Hillary took; the expectations of traditional first ladies they had known before were not met. After facing backlash via the press, the first lady receded to more acceptably defined notions of her actions, based largely in late 20th century conservative definitions of appropriate gender roles. By the end of 1998, consideration of a run for the Senate and increased public support for her more traditional image provided a compromise for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s public image. Having finally met the expectations of the nation, the press spoke less of the first lady in comparison to family values and almost exclusively by means of her political abilities. POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Department of History by Kelsey Snyder Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2015 Advisor __________________________________________ Kimberly Hamlin Reader ___________________________________________ Marguerite Shaffer Reader ___________________________________________ Monica Schneider TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Tim Russert of ''Meet the Press'' November 9, 1997
    Administration of William J. Clinton, 1997 / Nov. 9 1761 Americans, I see kind, unbelievably gener- Situation in Iraq ous, giving people back in my home State Mr. Russert. The situation in Iraq seems who helped my family and my friends when to grow more and more tense. As we sit here they were in need. It is a different story when tonight and talk, the Deputy Prime Minister you know what you are seeing. has said that if the United States resumes So I say to you tonight, should we change spy flights over Iraq, they will be shot down. the law? You bet. Should we keep fighting If Saddam Hussein was sitting right here in discrimination? Absolutely. Is this Hate this seat, you would look him in the eye and Crimes Conference important? It is terribly say what? important. But we have to broaden the The President. Those flights are United imagination of America. We are redefining, Nations flights, even though they're Amer- in practical terms, the immutable ideals that ican pilots in those planes, and you cannot have guided us from the beginning. Again dictate to the United Nations what we do. I say, we have to make sure that for every They will resume, and if you shoot at them, single person in our country, all Americans you'll be making a big mistake. means all Americans. Mr. Russert. If a plane is shot down by After experiencing the horrors of the Civil the Iraqis, will that be considered an act of War and witnessing the transformation of the war by the United States? previous century, Walt Whitman said that The President.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Programs
    Los Angeles Valley College L A V C 5800 Fulton Avenue Catalog 2004-2005 Valley Glen, CA 91401-4096 (818) 947-2600 www.lavc.edu AVAILABLE IN ALTERNATIVE MEDIA FORMATS L o s Catalog A n g e l e s Catalog 2004-2005 V a Ballet/ l l PE 460 e y C o l Catalog l e g e • C a t a l o COLLEGE DIRECTORY HOW TO REACH Los Angeles Valley College g 2 Admissions Office (818) 947-2553 0 0 4 Associate Degree Requirements (818) 947-2546 5 - Bookstore (818) 947-2313 2 0 Business Office (818) 947-2318 0 5 0 Career/Transfer Center (818) 947-2646 Child Development Center (818) 947-2531 Counseling Department (818) 947-2546 0 Community Services Program (818) 947-2577 Disabled Student Services (DSPS) (818) 947-2681 Geology 1 2 EOPS (818) 947-2432 - Extension Program (818) 947-2320 Financial Aid Office (818) 947-2412 4 PACE Program (818) 947-2455 0 Placement Office (818) 947-2333 0 Transfer Alliance Program (TAP) (818) 947-2629 2 YOUR FUTURE BEGINS HERE! YOUR FUTURE BEGINS HERE! SHERMAN WAY L LOS N VICTORY BLVD. ANGELES VALLEY Y A COLLEGE L . W OXNARD ST. A D E N . V E K L D R E V B F L R N S O B BURBANK BLVD. O H G N Y I . E . M I O . N E D D Y E B V A V N V L L A C N H V A A B A O N R D C S L N S A E L .
    [Show full text]
  • Wordperfect Presentations
    PowerPoint 2000 Page 1 PowerPoint WHAT IS PRESENTATION SOFTWARE? When you attend conference presentations or seminars, the presenter will often use a computer and an overhead projector to display the seminar material so everyone in the audience can view it on a large screen. Using a mouse, the presenter moves sequentially through a series of screens or slides. To illustrate his or her points, the presenter will use text, clip art, photographs, graphs, charts, tables and sound. Transitions will be used to move from one screen to the next. You may also receive a handout containing pictures of the slides. The software that is used for this kind of presentation is called Presentation Software. Most major software companies have produced a version of the presentation software. One of the first programs was Harvard Graphics. Other presentation software includes: Freelance Graphics (Lotus) Corel Show (Corel) PowerPoint (Microsoft) Corel WordPerfect Presentations WHAT IS PowerPoint? PowerPoint is a program that assists you when you make a presentation. It provides for easy input of text, graphics, tables and charts to produce eye catching "slides" and allows you to present on a computer screen or will print out your masters for overhead transparencies. It also allows you to make a handout of your presentation. You can enhance your computer slide show by introducing animation, sound clips, photographs and fades and wipes. The progression for your slide show can be linear or non-linear. There is a web site with a tutorial at: http://booleweb.ucc.ie/ecd/mat/guides/ppt/pptguide.html GETTING STARTED This tutorial will show you how to use the program PowerPoint to produce a presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Power Player: Russert to Deliver Post-Election Analysis
    By Tom Schuman The image that most people have of Tim Russert is one of an icy stare as he relentlessly questions the guest in the hot seat on NBC’s Meet the Press. But moderator of the top-rated Sunday public affairs program is only one of Russert’s duties. The 54- year-old Buffalo, New York native Political is also: • Managing editor of the program • Senior vice president and Washington Power Player bureau chief of NBC News • Political analyst for NBC Nightly Russert to Deliver News and the Today program Post-Election Analysis • Anchor of The Tim Russert Show, a weekly interview offering on CNBC • A contributing anchor for MSNBC In other words, if it’s news and Washington is involved – isn’t it always – then Russert will be there to deliver an immediate description of the impact and/or an in-depth probe for additional information and insights. Although always active and quite visible, Russert will be on center stage in the next few months. As the presidential campaign leads to the November election, Russert will be one of the key people Americans will count on for analysis of the race for the White House. 36 BizVoice/Indiana Chamber – September/October 2004 Al Gore utilizes a graphic to make his point on Meet the Press. Russert (second from right) worked New York Gov. Mario Cuomo (right). (His post-eelection review and look ahead to the next four A graduate of John Carroll University and the Cleveland-Marshall years will be featured as Russert delivers the keynote address College of Law, Russert was a special counsel in the United at the Indiana Chamber’s 15th Annual Awards Dinner on States Senate from 1977-82 and a counselor in the New York November 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Test Packages Currently Available
    Skills Testing Available Office/Professional ACT! 2000 for Users Healthcare Benefits Knowledge Project Management Fundamentals Advanced Spelling Human Resource Basics Proofreader's Marks Analytical Skills Human Resources Benefits Punctuation Basic Reading Comprehension Knowledge Reading Comprehension Basic Office Skills [Inc. Math/Verbal] Internet Basics Recruiting Fundamentals Basic Spelling Internet Research Skills Retention Bookkeeping Interviewing and Hiring Concepts Sales Concepts Business Etiquette Italian/English Bilingual Shorthand Business Systems Analyst Listening Skills [audio] Software Quality Assurance Business Writing Mailroom Management Skills Software Testing Cash Handling Marketing Fundamentals Spanish-English Bilingual Clerical Proofreading Matching Technical Terminology Coding Math Word Problems Typing - General Comparison Skills Numeric Filing Vocabulary Computer Literacy Numeric Proofreading Vocabulary – Homonym Usage Corrective Proofreading Office Abbreviations Writing Sample - Counting Office Filing Skills Advertising/Marketing Customer Service Mindset Survey Office Grammar & Spelling Writing Sample - Collection Letter Data Entry 10 Key Office Management Skills Writing Sample - Customer Service Data Entry Alpha Numeric Office Math Skills Writing Sample – Market Research Email Etiquette Office Reasoning Writing Sample - Persuasive English as a Second Language Office Telephone Etiquette Writing Sample - Sales Filing by Name Payroll Correspondence Following
    [Show full text]