DOCSLIB.ORG

INFOВМAТION BШ.L.ETIN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INFOВМAТION BШ.L.ETIN INFOВМAТION BШ.l.ETIN Number37 $5.00 / ...... N ew World Order: Tunnel at the End ofthe Light • Views oflraqi Victims • Is Korea Next? • Tehran's DouЫe-cross • Strong-arming the U.N. • Manufacturing War and Consent ] ч Editorial "[W]e have 50 percent of the world's wealth, but only have to compete for funds and jockey for bureaucratic and 6.3% of lts populatlon .. .ln thls sltuation we cannot fail ideological control with NSA, militaryintelligence, NED, and to Ье the object of envy and resentment. Our real task other defenders of the American way. ln the coming period ls to devlse а pattem of relation­ One of the few legacies of Webster's reign as Director of shlps whlch will allow us to malntaln thls posltlon of Central Intelligence is the "fifth directorate," as the Agency's dlsparlty... We should cease to talk about the raislng of announced focus on economic intelligence collection is the livlng standards and democratizatlon. The day ls known. Тhе CIA has, of course, engaged in economic data notfar off when we are gblng to have to deal ln stralght gathering and industrial espionage for decades, thereby re­ power concepts." flecting the official view that the interests of the U .S. public -George Кennan, Dir. of Policy Planning, State Dept., 1948 and those of its corporations are identicle. Some observers, including Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-NY) and of "There are two hundred mllllon us and three Ыlllon former Кissinger aide Roger Morris have also charged that of them. They want what we've got and we ain't going tbls new emphasis is part of the Agency's attempt to sell its to give lt to them." post-Cold War importance and Ыoated budget to Congress - President Lyndon Johnson to U.S. troops ln Vietnam and the U.S. public. In DecemЬer 1988, when Bush nominated Gates to Ье his With William Webster's resignation and RoЬert Gates' deputy national security adviser, the President called hiщ nomination as head. of the CIA, the press has Ьееn fu1l of "admiraЬly suited," an assessment not universally shared speculation about transformations of the Agency. Bysuggest­ within the Agency. Fueled Ьу anticommunist fervor, driven ing that the "death" of the Cold War implies а radical change, Ьу raw am.Ьition, and enjoying the active support of bls new the media is complicit in perpetuating the inyth that the real patron William. Casey, Gates rose rapidlyfrom national intel­ rationale Ьehind post-World War 11 U.S. foreign policywas ligence officer analyzing Soviet affairs under Carter to chair the defeat of the international communist conspiracy. in fact, the pivotal Deputies Committee of Bush's National Security the end of the East-West struggle and the removal of the Council. Word inside the Agency according to the Washing­ ideological filter of anticommunism have revealed and in­ ton Post as early as 1987 was that "Webster has come to rely stitutionalized the dynamic wblch had consistently generated heavily on Gates, who runs day-to-day operations." Since U.S. post-World War 11 policy-the North-South struggle. 1988, а knowledgeaЫe source told CAIB, Gates has been Now the Cold War is declared over. And still (to the virtually running the CIA out of his NSC office. surprise of the media) there is no реасе; no реасе dividend, Не was tripped up in Ыs first nomination for DCI in 1987 and no end in sight to U.S. aggression and support for brutal because he got caught during the lran-Contra scandal Ыa­ regimes. Globally, the world remaiils divided Ьetween the tantly lying to Congress. :• ... 1 tblnk that lying to the Congress haves in the industrialized North and the havenots in the less is just wrong," he lied. developed South. Maintaining tbls distribution of wealth and Не may Ье damaged this time around because of recent power and protecting those who Ьenefit from it underlie U.S. revelations that he facilitated arms sales to lraq. ln his favor policy and the CIA's mission-wblle anticommunism merely is strong support from Bush, with whom he worked closely provides expedient legitimation. during the Gulf War. Wblle Webster was excluded from the Тhat is not to saythat either the world dynamic or the CIA inner circle of Gulf War planners, Gates attended key meet­ has reinained static. Militarily, with the disintegration of the ings and had the president's ear. Soviet Union as а superpower, the U.S. has assumed undis­ With or without cosmetic changes or tactical refocusing of puted wor1d dominance. Economically, however, Ьesieged Ьу priorities, the CIA's mission remains unchanged-the pro­ recession, а decaying infrastructure, and а staggering deЬt, tection of narrow, self-defined U.S. interests around the the U.S. faces serious challenges from Asia and Europe. gloЬe. Тhе events of the last few years and the nomination of Bretton Woods has_.Ьeen turned into а parking lot filled with Gates, an apostle of the "old school," are evidence enough Japanese cars. that although legitimations come and go, U .S. foreign policy Increasinglythe CIA will Ье called on to respond to attacks objectives and the mission of the CIA remain depressingly on the soft U.S. economic underЬelly. Тhе Agency will also consistent. • CovertAction lnformation Вulledn, (ISSN: 0275-309Х) Number 37, CovertAction Information Bulletin, Number 37, Summer 1991, copyright Summer 1991 is published quarterly for $17 per year Ьу Covert Action С 1991 Ьу Covert Action PuЫications, lnc., а District of Columbia Non- PuЫications, Inc" 1500 Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Suite ~2, Wash- profit Corporation; Р.О. Вах34583, Washington, DC 20043; (202) 331-9763; ington, DC 20005. Application to mail at second-class postage rates and с/о IМА, Inc., 145 W. 4th St., New York, NY 10012; (212) 982-2897. А11 pending at Washington, DC and additional mailing offices. РОSТ- rights reserved. Staff: Terry Allen, Bill Montross, Dolores Neuman, ВаrЬа- МASI'ER: Send address changes to CovertAction Information Вulletin, ra Neuwirth, Ellen Ray, Richard Ray, William Schaap, Louis Wolf. Typeset 1500 Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Suite 732 Washington, DC 20005. Ьу СА/В. Indexed in theAltemative Press Index, ISSN 0275-309Х. 2 CovertAction NumЬer 37 (Summer 1991) ln This lssue Bush's Tool and Victim 4 Domestic Consequences 36 Phyl/is Bennis Diana Reynolds The U.S. Ыackmailed, bullied and bribed U.N. members to In the Gulf, war cost untold thousands of lives and im­ support its war in the Gulf. Вennis explores the implications measurat?le environmental and cultural devastation. In the of the cashregister coalition for the future of the ''peace­ U.S., political and economic rights were among the casualties. keeping" institution. Reynolds documents the imperial presidency. Disinformation and Covert Operations 9 "Not the Amerlca 1 кnew" 42 Ellen Ray and William Н. Schaap David S. Fal/is The editors of Ues of Our Times dismantle key elements of Terty Reed comblned patriotism, covert operations and а yen the Bush administration's GulfWar propaganda, and review for extra cash when he signed up with the С1А In too deep, рrоЬаЫе U.S. violations of the Geneva Conventions. he found himself caught in Oliver North's lran-Contra web. North Korea, The Next Target? 14 Dismantling the War Оп Libya 47 Mili Kang Jane Hunter lraq was the first major target in Bush's New World Order. When bomblng LiЬya didn't take out Qaddafi, the CIA or­ Pentagon documents and media speculation suggest that ganized another covert war. When that adventure collapsed, Коrеа could Ье next. Кang explores the parallels, actual and the Agency inherited more homeless contras. fabricated. Trading With the Enemy 20 lran: Unholy Alliances, Holy Terror 52 Jack Colhoun Salaam Al-Sharqi Right up to the invasion of Kuwait, the U.S. exported high The fall of the Shah officially took the Лgency Ьу surprise. technology with militaty applications to lraq. How much did Perhaps. The Islamic repuьtic has been rebuilding the Shah's U.S. corporations profit Ьу helping Iraq build weapons that westem bridges ever since. The Gulf War was largely good would Ье used against U.S. troops? news in Tehran. Sowing Disorder, Reaping Disaster 25 Gossip as а Weapon of War 61 Jane Hunter Margarвt Randall Broadcasting is а key tool of the CIA. In Iraq, it backfired А review of Guerrilla Prince, Georgie Anne Geyer's new when the Agency first incited the Kurds to rebel and then left Ьiography of Fidel Castro. The book is an object lesson in them twisting in the wind for the entire world to see. how to make а long and lucrative career of pandering to power. The Myth of the Clean War 26 The Company 1 Didn't Кеер Раи/ Rogers 65 Corporate media projected the sanitized image of а clean, John L. Hess Ыoodless video war. Вehind that facade is а gruesome new Some joumalists are "unwitting assets," Ыind couriers for generation of antipersonnel munitions second onlyto nuclear QA-generated information or disinformation. А former weapons in destructive power. New York Times Mideast correspondent remembers. Evangelicals for Nuclear War · 31 Cover: LarryJones The Gulf, Februaty 10. Seaman Jim Hollis of Atlanta, Georgia greases The U.S. Religious Right has Ьееn а spiritual buttress to а 16 inch gun aЬoard фе battleship U.S.S. Wisconsin, in preparation official Cold War ideology. Hot war in the fertile crescent has for more shelling of Kuwait. АР/Wide World Photos excited some of the chosen to call for the nuclear option. Back Cover: Kuwait City, March 9. Crown Prince Sheik Saad al-Sabah and а radiant lraqi Voices: Human Cost of the War 34 Jim Вaker exchange pleasantries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Force Quarterly 97
    Issue 97, 2nd Quarter 2020 JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Broadening Traditional Domains Commercial Satellites and National Security Ulysses S. Grant and the U.S. Navy ISSUE NINETY-SEVEN, 2 ISSUE NINETY-SEVEN, ND QUARTER 2020 Joint Force Quarterly Founded in 1993 • Vol. 97, 2nd Quarter 2020 https://ndupress.ndu.edu GEN Mark A. Milley, USA, Publisher VADM Frederick J. Roegge, USN, President, NDU Editor in Chief Col William T. Eliason, USAF (Ret.), Ph.D. Executive Editor Jeffrey D. Smotherman, Ph.D. Production Editor John J. Church, D.M.A. Internet Publications Editor Joanna E. Seich Copyeditor Andrea L. Connell Associate Editor Jack Godwin, Ph.D. Book Review Editor Brett Swaney Art Director Marco Marchegiani, U.S. Government Publishing Office Advisory Committee Ambassador Erica Barks-Ruggles/College of International Security Affairs; RDML Shoshana S. Chatfield, USN/U.S. Naval War College; Col Thomas J. Gordon, USMC/Marine Corps Command and Staff College; MG Lewis G. Irwin, USAR/Joint Forces Staff College; MG John S. Kem, USA/U.S. Army War College; Cassandra C. Lewis, Ph.D./College of Information and Cyberspace; LTG Michael D. Lundy, USA/U.S. Army Command and General Staff College; LtGen Daniel J. O’Donohue, USMC/The Joint Staff; Brig Gen Evan L. Pettus, USAF/Air Command and Staff College; RDML Cedric E. Pringle, USN/National War College; Brig Gen Kyle W. Robinson, USAF/Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National Security and Resource Strategy; Brig Gen Jeremy T. Sloane, USAF/Air War College; Col Blair J. Sokol, USMC/Marine Corps War College; Lt Gen Glen D. VanHerck, USAF/The Joint Staff Editorial Board Richard K.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Report
    Oregon Cultural Trust fy2011 annual report fy2011 annual report 1 Contents Oregon Cultural Trust fy2011 annual report 4 Funds: fy2011 permanent fund, revenue and expenditures Cover photos, 6–7 A network of cultural coalitions fosters cultural participation clockwise from top left: Dancer Jonathan Krebs of BodyVox Dance; Vital collaborators – five statewide cultural agencies artist Scott Wayne 8–9 Indiana’s Horse Project on the streets of Portland; the Museum of 10–16 Cultural Development Grants Contemporary Craft, Portland; the historic Astoria Column. Oregonians drive culture Photographs by 19 Tatiana Wills. 20–39 Over 11,000 individuals contributed to the Trust in fy2011 oregon cultural trust board of directors Norm Smith, Chair, Roseburg Lyn Hennion, Vice Chair, Jacksonville Walter Frankel, Secretary/Treasurer, Corvallis Pamela Hulse Andrews, Bend Kathy Deggendorfer, Sisters Nick Fish, Portland Jon Kruse, Portland Heidi McBride, Portland Bob Speltz, Portland John Tess, Portland Lee Weinstein, The Dalles Rep. Margaret Doherty, House District 35, Tigard Senator Jackie Dingfelder, Senate District 23, Portland special advisors Howard Lavine, Portland Charlie Walker, Neskowin Virginia Willard, Portland 2 oregon cultural trust December 2011 To the supporters and partners of the Oregon Cultural Trust: Culture continues to make a difference in Oregon – activating communities, simulating the economy and inspiring us. The Cultural Trust is an important statewide partner to Oregon’s cultural groups, artists and scholars, and cultural coalitions in every county of our vast state. We are pleased to share a summary of our Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011) activity – full of accomplishment. The Cultural Trust’s work is possible only with your support and we are pleased to report on your investments in Oregon culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Air & Space Power Journal, November-December 2012, Volume 26, No. 6, AFRP 10-1
    November–December 2012 Volume 26, No. 6 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective Airmen ❙ 4 Delivering Decision Advantage Lt Gen Larry D. James, USAF Features For and from Cyberspace ❙ 12 Conceptualizing Cyber Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Col Matthew M. Hurley, USAF Manned Airborne Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance ❙ 34 Strategic, Tactical . Both? Maj Tyler Morton, USAF The F-22 Acquisition Program ❙ 53 Consequences for the US Air Force’s Fighter Fleet Lt Col Christopher J. Niemi, USAF Personnel Recovery ❙ 83 Strategic Importance and Impact Col Lee Pera, USAF Paul D. Miller Darrel Whitcomb Departments 113 ❙ Views A Culminating Point for Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance . 113 Col Jon Kimminau, PhD, USAF, Retired Realizing the Potential of Analytics: Arming the Human Mind . 130 Maj Robert D. Folker Jr., USAF Capt Kyle Benjamin Bressette, USAF Lightning Strikes and Thunder Claps: The Strategic Bomber and Air Superiority . 137 Maj Wade S. Karren, USAF 146 ❙ Historical Highlight The Evolution of Air Force Targeting Capt John R. Glock, USAF 175 ❙ Book Reviews Leading with Honor: Leadership Lessons from the Hanoi Hilton . 175 Lee Ellis Reviewer: Dr. Richard I. Lester Eisenhower 1956: The President’s Year of Crisis—Suez and the Brink of War . 178 David A. Nichols Reviewer: Maj Thomas F. Menza, USAF, Retired 7 Deadly Scenarios: A Military Futurist Explores War in the 21st Century . 182 Andrew F. Krepinevich Reviewer: 2d Lt James W. Anderson, USAF (active) Drugs and Contemporary Warfare . 184 Paul Rexton Kan Reviewer: Jan Kallberg, PhD Flying from the Black Hole: The B-52 Navigator-Bombardiers of Vietnam . 186 Robert O.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary of Defense Task Force on Dod Nuclear Weapons Management
    Report of the Secretary of Defense Task Force on DoD Nuclear Weapons Management Phase I: The Air Force’s Nuclear Mission September 2008 Secretary of Defense Task Force on DoD Nuclear Weapons Management Chairman The Honorable James R. Schlesinger Task Force Members General Michael P. C. Carns, USAF (Ret) The Honorable J. D. Crouch II The Honorable Jacques S. Gansler Admiral Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., USN (Ret) The Honorable John J. Hamre The Honorable Franklin C. Miller Mr. Christopher A. Williams Executive Director Dr. James A. Blackwell, Jr. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE TASK FORCE ON DOD NUCLEAR WEAPONS MANAGEMENT 1901 SOUTH BELL STREET, CRYSTAL MALL 4, SUITE 900-D, ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4521 PHONE: (703) 602-1450 FAX: (703) 602-0968 The Honorable Robert M. Gates 12 September 2008 Secretary of Defense 1000 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-1000 Dear Mr. Secretary: The Task Force you appointed on 12 June has completed the first phase of its work, addressing the nuclear mission of the Air Force. The attached Phase I Report provides independent, professional advice on our findings and our recommended improvements in Air Force organization and stewardship. Such improvements are essential both to sustain public confidence in the safety and surety of our nuclear weaponry and to bolster clear international understanding in the continuing role and credibility of the U.S. nuclear deterrent. As compared to its role in the Cold War, the nuclear mission is both different and more circumscribed. Nonetheless, it remains crucial. Other nations have substantial capabilities; some of which are growing. The number of nuclear states may be increasing—making the challenge of deterrence ever more complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasing Success
    AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Chasing Success Air Force Efforts to Reduce Civilian Harm Sarah B. Sewall Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Sewall, Sarah B. Copy Editor Carolyn Burns Chasing success : Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm / Sarah B. Sewall. Cover Art, Book Design and Illustrations pages cm L. Susan Fair ISBN 978-1-58566-256-2 Composition and Prepress Production 1. Air power—United States—Government policy. Nedra O. Looney 2. United States. Air Force—Rules and practice. 3. Civilian war casualties—Prevention. 4. Civilian Print Preparation and Distribution Diane Clark war casualties—Government policy—United States. 5. Combatants and noncombatants (International law)—History. 6. War victims—Moral and ethical aspects. 7. Harm reduction—Government policy— United States. 8. United States—Military policy— Moral and ethical aspects. I. Title. II. Title: Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm. UG633.S38 2015 358.4’03—dc23 2015026952 AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Published by Air University Press in March 2016 Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Managing Editor Demorah Hayes Design and Production Manager Cheryl King Air University Press 155 N. Twining St., Bldg. 693 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026 [email protected] http://aupress.au.af.mil/ http://afri.au.af.mil/ Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the organizations with which they are associated or the views of the Air Force Research Institute, Air University, United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or any AFRI other US government agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Strategic Planning: Past, Present, and Future
    C O R P O R A T I O N Air Force Strategic Planning Past, Present, and Future Raphael S. Cohen For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1765 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9697-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface For a relatively young service, the U.S. Air Force has a remarkably rich intellectual history. Even before the Air Force’s official formation, the development of airpower has been dotted with such visionaries as Billy Mitchell and Henry “Hap” Arnold.
    [Show full text]
  • The Billy Mitchell Syndrome A
    Airpower advocates always have, and always will, face certain occupational hazards. The Billy Mitchell Syndrome By Rebecca Grant Mitchell, shown standing at his 1925 court-martial, wrote that airmen “are bluffed and bulldozed so that they dare not tell the truth [about airpower], knowing full well that if they do, they will be deprived of their future career.” irpower advocacy is part of tion of complex capabilities, delivered Air Force chief historian, has written being an airman. Air Force at just the right time, in the right place, that one result, among senior airmen, Doctrine Document 2 tells to the right persons. The message has is a “tendency to not be as aggressive Aall USAF members, “Each of you must not always been welcome. Today is in arguing the airpower case as one be articulate, knowledgeable, and un- no different. would expect them to be.” Call it the apologetic advocates.” It adds, “We Advocacy has a checkered history Billy Mitchell Syndrome. must understand what it means to be an in the Air Force and its predecessor Mitchell, America’s first great air airman” and explain “what air and space organizations. Start with Brig. Gen. commander, was the master of air- power can bring to the joint fight.” William Mitchell in the 1920s, and power advocacy. (See “The Real Billy Advocacy rarely has been easy or you see that speaking up for airpower Mitchell,” February 2001, p. 64.) He safe. It has required reasoned articula- carried risks. Richard P. Hallion, former saw that it was a multipronged task, 52 AIR FORCE Magazine / December 2006 requiring work in the joint community, American officer knew who to convince, mirals.” That all-out Washington brawl with allies, inside the US government, what to say, how to explain airpower, pitted Air Force backers against Navy in the press, and in the public arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Generations of Chevrons a History of the Enlisted Force
    Generations of Chevrons A History of the Enlisted Force ★ Edited by Janet R. Bednarek Generations of Chevrons A History of the Enlisted Force ★ Edited by Janet R. Bednarek AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. 2004 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the au- thor(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of the Air Force History and Museums Program, the U.S. Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other U.S. Government agency. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Generations of chevrons : a history of the enlisted force / edited by Janet R. Bednarek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. United States. Air Force—Non-commissioned officers—Biography. 2. United States—Biogra- phy. I. Bednarek, Janet R. Daly (Janet Rose Daly), 1959- 9- UG626.G44 2004 358.4’0092’2—dc222 2004026962 ★ This book is dedicated to the memory of four great chief master sergeants of the Air Force: CMSAF DONALD L. HARLOW 1920–1997 CMSAF RICHARD D. KISLING 1923–1985 CMSAF ARTHUR L. “BUD” ANDREWS 1934–1996 CMSAF THOMAS N. BARNES 1930–2003 CONTENTS Preface . ix Foreword . xi Introduction . 1 CHIEF MASTER SERGEANTS OF THE AIR FORCE Paul W. Airey. 45 Donald L. Harlow . 57 Richard D. Kisling. 69 Thomas N. Barnes. 81 Robert D. Gaylor . 93 James M. McCoy. 105 Arthur L. “Bud” Andrews. 117 Sam E. Parish . 129 James C. Binnicker . 141 Gary R. Pfingston . 153 David J. Campanale. 167 Eric W. Benken . 179 Frederick J. Finch . 191 Gerald R.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Strike: Imperatives, Urgency and Options
    LONG-RANGE STRIKE: IMPERATIVES, URGENCY AND OPTIONS Barry D. Watts Thinking Center for Strategic and Budgetary Smarter Assessments About Defense www.csbaonline.org Long-Range Strike: Imperatives, Urgency and Options by Barry D. Watts Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments April 2005 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, non-partisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions in matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. This report is one in a series of CSBA analyses on future U.S. military strategy, force structure, operations, and budgets. These assessments are integrally linked to CSBA’s research on the emerging military revolution. Previous reports in this series include The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (2002), Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge (2003), The Revolution in War (2004), and Winning the Race: A Naval Architecture for Enduring Maritime Supremacy (forthcoming, 2005). The analysis and findings presented here are solely the responsibility of the Center for Strategic and the Budgetary Assessments and the author. 1730 Rhode Island Ave., NW Suite 912 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 CONTENTS GLOSSARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................. i I. FRAMING THE PROBLEM .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Culture and American Civil-Military Relations
    Tinted Blue Air Force Culture and American Civil-Military Relations Jeff Donnithorne, Major, USAF If war is an extension of politics by other means,1 then civil-military dialogue is the birthplace of that extension. Thelogical continuity of poli- tics and war requires a functional continuity of effective civil-military ex- change. This effectiveness hinges both on normative democratic ideals as well as a deep appreciation of the other’s material interests. To improve the clarity of civil-military dialogue, this article explores the cultural roots of military self-interest. While civil-military relations in the United States are generally healthy, military and civilian policymakers do not always agree on the proper means to secure their common ends. Even the best of civil-military rela- tionships must endure a messy hybrid of cooperation and resistance be- tween principal stakeholders. A military that believes in and submits to civilian control is still a military that harbors its own interests. But what are the origins of military self-interest? Is it useful to assume that these massive organizations simply crave more money, autonomy, and prestige?2 The “empirically based abstraction” of organizational cul- ture suggests otherwise, exposing deeper currents that shape military self- interest.3 Culture predisposes the attractiveness of certain conclusions while creating cognitive barriers to aberrant ones; it impacts what its members see, ignore, amplify, and discard.4 In civil-military relations, in- terests matter—and for a military service, culture uniquely informs the content of that interest.5 In light of these material interests, Peter Feaver invokes a principal- agent framework to assess how civil-military relations in the United States The author wishes to thank Maj Tony Carr, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unauthorized Movement of Nuclear Weapons and Mistaken Shipment of Classified Missile Components: an Assessment
    The Unauthorized Movement of Nuclear Weapons and Mistaken Shipment of Classified Missile Components: An Assessment Michelle Spencer, Aadina Ludin, and Heather Nelson Advisor: Colonel Larry Chandler, USAF, ret. US Air Force Counterproliferation Center 56 Future Warfare Series No. 56 The Unauthorized Movement of Nuclear Weapons and Mistaken Shipment of Classified Missile Components: An Assessment by Michelle Spencer Aadina Ludin Heather Nelson Advisor: Col. Larry Chandler (USAF, ret.) The Counterproliferation Papers Future Warfare Series No. 56 January 2012 USAF Counterproliferation Center Air University Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama ii The Unauthorized Movement of Nuclear Weapons and Mistaken Shipment of Classified Missile Components: An Assessment Michelle Spencer Aadina Ludin Heather Nelson The USAF Counterproliferation Center was established to provide education, research and analysis to assist the understanding of the U.S. national security policy-makers and USAF officers to help them better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. The USAF Counterproliferation Center is funded jointly by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and the United States Air Force. Copies of this report and other publications are available on the USAF Counterproliferation Center website: http://cpc.au.af.mil or by contacting them directly by mail at USAF Counterproliferation Center, 325 Chennault Circle, Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6427; phone: (334) 953-7538 / DSN 493-7538; fax: (334) 953-7530 / DSN 493-7530; or email: [email protected]. USAF Counterproliferation Center Air University Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6427 iii DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S.
    [Show full text]