chapter 13 Under the Rainbow. Migration, Precarity and People Power in Post-apartheid South Africa1
Carl-Ulrik Schierup
Our communities are so broken. Millions of South Africans go to bed hungry. There is so much despair. We live with so much inequality, pov- erty, hunger and unemployment. When real movements emerge, this in- fuses humanity and social consciousness in our people. They provide a terrain of urgency as opposed to the politics of the messiah. Kota Ayanda, Chairperson of the Unemployed People’s Movement kota 2014
Ubuntu Shattered?
‘Apartheid’ was the ideological keystone of white supremacy in South Africa between 1948 and 1994. It has been recycled as a negatively loaded metaphor in numerous studies of the political economy of migration, citizenship and labour in the global ‘North’ as well as in the ‘South’.2 It remains an ideotypical signifier for ‘unfree labour’3 founded on class violence, exclusion from rights
1 This is an expanded version of an article that originally appeared as Under the Rainbow: Migration, Precarity and People Power in Post-Apartheid South Africa, Critical Sociology, DOI: 10.1177/0896920515621118. 2 E.g., ‘American apartheid’ depicting the conditions of a radicalized ‘underclass’ in the United States (Massey and Denton 1993), the ‘European apartheid’ of the 21st century citizenship regime of the European Union (Balibar 2004), the ‘economic apartheid’ of ‘multicultural’ Canada (Galabuzi 2006), ‘social apartheid’ in Brazil (Hunt 2007), Saudi Arabia read as ‘The Middle East’s Real Apartheid State’ (Greenfield 2014), and the declaration of an ‘indepen- dent’ Palestine as a ‘bantustan in disguise’ (Eid 2015). 3 Thus contradicting the Marxist doctrine seeing ‘free labour’ as the quintessential charac- ter of labour under capitalism. That is the wage labourer’s ‘freedom’ from ownership of the means of production, but also her basic freedom to sell her labour through negotiating, signing or terminating an employment contract (Marx 1976 [1885]). More broadly, reflect- ing on new trends in the international migration of labour in the 1980s, Robert Miles (1987) and Robin Cohen (1987) argued that ‘unfree labour’ more appropriately reflects the actual
© koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi 10.1163/9789004329706_014
conditions of a wide range of workers under capitalism, past and present, exposed to social exclusion, racism, discriminatory labour market segmentation and differential forms of for- mal and informal coercion, and thereby not having the capacity to freely circulating their labour in the market.