DOCSLIB.ORG

"Pacificorp Annual Rept 1993."

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
_ - -_ __ - _ - , . , 1 1 * y r. er ya ' L \ . p - 1, g . f ,^ \ 3 '' ' ,a- y + ' }, - 1 . 1 , ' # -2 i . ;$ 4 f 3 ' n c ~ v. Pic d rC=oair.. ! r u.~ -c. ,. , y , ,. ^ ~' ,' ' 't [ $. , { ' JI . '# d y,.9_ , ~ . , , . , . ~ ff ; . g% . 1 s ~ 4 . e . s- A. _ o t) ''' , - ' . * ~ ., . ps v-' V '# Y.,y. ' * . , . , ej - - , , v- ;. - m% . g - . ~ . m_ . $~ ANNUAL d a s ~ REPORI ' 1988 9506050325 950531 PDR ADOCK 05000344 I PDR , M __ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ CORPORATE PROFILE f2fCmC: PACinC Powm/Umi Pows Paci6 Corps electric utility business serves 1.3 million base i highly diversified, which reduces adverse effects retail customers and is the third largest utility in the from a downturn in any particular industry. ' West. It operates the nation's largest open access, high- 1993PtmauAsct voltage transmission system which, combined with its Revenues were up 6 percent, to $2.5 billion,73 per- 8 low electncity production costs, allows a to sell whole- cent of Paci6 Corps total. Earnings contribution was - sale energy to over 30 other $322 million,84 percent of PacifiCorps earnings from w - entities throughout the West. ,. continuing operations. -|( Fhe company is also the 12th largest U.S. coal producer based 1984Omon y [' g , , on tons mined, supplying coal As one of the natmn s lowest cost producers, '. , f < */ g i 7 exclusively to PacifiCorp plants. Paci6 Corp continues to prove it can prosper in a com- . petitive utility market. Its on-going objective is to MAMUS <I ' hk improve and build on that posinon m light ofincreas- Pacific Power and Utah ing competition from other suppliers. The company Power serve retail elms ms- will also continue to seek more ef6cient wavs to do tomers in Utah, Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, ' business, while emphasizing quality customer service Idaho, hiontana and northern California. Retail power and environmental stewardship. sales come from a nearly equal mix of residential, com- mercial and industrial customers. Even the industrial IMCOMMUMCATIONs: PACIRC TMCOM PacifiCorps telecommunications business is operat- Wyoming. It also pmvides long distance services in cd by Pacific Telecom, an 87 percent-owned subsidiary. Alaska through an extensive system of satellite carth sta- It is one of the nation's largest nonBell telephone tions, a state-of-the-art communications satellite and a companies and its strength lies in the successful opera- high capacity undersea 6ber optic cable connecting tion of local telephone exchanges in largely rural Alaska to the lower 48 states. communities throughout 11 1993 PIMMMANCE West ern and hiidwestern Revenues were up 1 percent, to $709 million, 21 states. PTl is also one of the percent of Paci6 Corps total. Earnings contribution was - founding companies in the 9 M $51 million,13 percent of PacifiCorps earnings from North Paci6c Cable, the first [ continuing operations. h direct trans-Paci6c 6ber optic [ *' h%a.',e cable system between the U.S. 1994 Ounou and Japan. PTI plans to expand its local exchange business in rural and suburban areas through proposed acquisitions, MAMUS and to consider future expansion opportunities as thev Pacific Telecom serves 398,700 access lines in arise. Also, the Alaska market restructuring issue will Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, hiinnesota, hiontana, continue to require attention in 1994, as a viable, long- Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Wisconsin and term solution is sought. Co m is - Financial Highlights 1 Electric 6 Of6cers 54 Financial Review 2 Telecommunications 14 Board of Directors 55 To Our Shareholders 3 linancial Section 19 Investor Information 56 Com Pitoin hiaintenance work on the 230 kilovolt circuit breaker transmission system reaches throughout the West and bushings helps keep the Sigurd substation in central pmvides the company with the flexibilirv to efficiently Utah running smoothly. PacifiCorp's extensive and economically meet customers' energy needs. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ CON 80L2ATED REVENUES dI|||IOM UI i101LARU 3soo MilIis re01 Ih it1 ARN IN I P1 Pl R %HTRi WOLN h. It )R 11!! MAR |mw l+> i. om; .[r) 3 00 l'c.cn:ap bu 1995 1992 ( omp nen 6 anwih Dernarms Resuti 2soo Revenues s 3,4:2 s 3,242 5% 3% ' - Income from Operations 916 633 45 ; 20m * income from Continuing Operations 423 iso 2 , j * * ! Discontinued Operations 52 (4 91) ' "" Cumulative Effect on Prior Years of Change in ! i ' - * * Accounting for income Taxes , 4 ; * * "o Net income (loss) 479 (341) i ! * ' Earnings (loss) on Common Stock 44o (378 ) 1 ; I Data na COMMON SHanE i I ! soo ' Earnings (loss) > ; ; * ' ' Continuing Operations s ' t.4o 5 42 (1) g * * Discontinued Operations .19 (i.8)4 88 89 90 91 92 94 Cumulative Effect on Prior Years of Change in 13 (>me, * * .on - Accounting for income Taxes %, Telecommunications * Total .6o (i.42) (2) % lleuric ()perations Dividends Paida) s. 95 142 (ii) (2) Book Wlue si.6 io.75 8 (1) EARNINGS AND > % Stock Price Range zoVs - 16Vs 25 - 18% (3)N 2'M DIVIDENDS PAID Fansciat PosmoN av DictMsta 31 PER COMMON SHARE V " " Id #" Assets s 11,959 $ it,257 6 3 2'" CapitalizationM 7 773 7,725 1 2 Capital Structure , long-Term Debt and Capital lease Obligations 5o% 54% Preferred Stock 8 8 'd Common Equity 42 38 Ornta Stari: Tics Return on Average Common Equir3M x25% 74% Market to Book Wlue (YearEnd) i66 % 184 % ! '" Cash Flow from Continuing Operations s i,o37 s 942 < Common Shares (Awrace. Tbsands) 274,55: 266,s27 ..mo. .eng ,m.,a,a a IWJ ip.u awro s the IturJ o' Dor.r.a. e m I cbwn Ho 1 ma osy if a mJueca a im,4.imard un .a rN ( omp.ir s s i ok po An ib bwdonna md ;nu do i t dda ihon iam Ahi anJ i nuh rn.1:ang ior . to n JcSt .m! .apa .| ' .awh obhpeu.m ( ul ( L ubrrd u mL anone t*ntt ru m.ay opr a i cw L.,h n,:4pn i ' s har gn m ' F ' buludq gm d shn ha rcmen tov ! I'if e a 4 a peru ng b o 88 N9 90 91 02 (J ) % l.arntnp "R! lbidends l' aid * ( A ulaicJ uung carnmp inom onnnump ogn r suon culueng su per dwt of qv.ul t h.irges m 1+)2 * \(( beettfii44 < a} al IcIl | I ' Pncli Ceap 1 i _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ I ; r ;, , 9j. j '' 1 : >f , [: s1 - ,i. , # TOTAL INVE8TMENT RETURN FIVE-YEAR teEXED EANENG8 COMPOUND RATE THERMAL PLANT PER COMMON SHARE 1988-1993 PERFORMANCE ACCE88 LINES il><>LL4ky (I'l klDT1 TQI It AITNT A t AIL 4 Bill 1T IIHOUL4NIW t.25 20 88 % 400 , 350 Loo g i i 4 is 3oo 82 25o 75 80 * lo 200 , ' '_ 78 g 15o ! a e . 76 ' 5 too .25 72 50 1 - o o , . 7o o 88 89 90 91 92 43 .84 85- 86- 87- 88 89- 88 89 90 91 92 93 88 89 90 9t 92 93 % PacifiCorp* %, PacifiCorp i:ive Year Moving Averages % Standard & Poor's 500* % Standard & Poor's 500 g pgg % Standard & Poori1:lectrics* % Top 50 Utilitics' fB NERC Equivalent' , !%ithrjn roults weic uliulmed ueng 1Raoked in non vrunun of t Nonh Amenon 1 Iccuh Relubiluy s f rom tonunmnp oivraouns. %Iomon Brothers' I letinu. Count d; infonnanon for 19'O i not ntin i , carnapo,ms nev fnp 5hy, mlwr m n,.n share or 5 i6 mden ni amu *- *l yurcs mdntd to a tw of Swo m niNM Sum knavneT Sam n Acas La Gem Carnut: Tamuit Ptm Poromimet * PadfiCor;61993 net intome was * PadtiCorp's five-year total investmeni Through enhanted maintenance Pacific Telecom experienced a 5 per- 5&9 million. return stands ai 8.5 percent. methods. new materials and other im- cent increase in local telephone pmvements. PacifiCorp's thernul plants exchange access lines in 1993, for a * Net income from PadtiCorp's * The MP Ws sn(L price appreda- have experienced steady increases in total of more than 398 "00 access continuing operations was $423 non anJ dividends mmbined to return plant equivalent availabihty - the imes. Access line growth in its senice milhon. 14.5 percent. amount of time a plant is available to areas has exca&J the national average produce at full-load. in recent years. O laminp per mmmon share were 51.60 * The top 50 of the Salomon Brothers' compared to 1992 loss per share of 1.lectrics. ranked by IW2 revenues, in rnent years. PadfCorp's plant Most of the growth in 1993 was due 51.42. retumed 16.2 pcttent over the five-year equivalent availability has grow n at a to population increases in many of the period, rate that is about three nmes faster than areas it serves. Pacific Telewm also e tw3 caminp per mmmon share from the national average for wmparable continues to look for appropriate continumg operations was 51 40 thermal plants. opportunities to expand the laal tele- wmparcJ to s 42 in t w2. phone exchange business through acquisitions. ! PACIiiCIIP L_________ - .. _ -.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Centurylink™TM Columbia, SC 29201 Tel:Tel 803.252.4505803 252Rt505
    - / 38- E1 Fp~ 1122 Lady Street, Suite 1050 CenturyLiakCenturyLink™TM Columbia, SC 29201 Tel:Tel 803.252.4505803 252rt505 VIA HAND DELIVERY June 29, 2012 Jocelyn D. Boyd, Esquire Chief Clerk and Administrator Public Service Commission of SouthSouth Carolina 101 Executive Center Drive, Suite 100 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 Re: Certification of the Use of Universal Service Funds pursuant to 4747 C.F.R. §§55 54.313, 54.314;54,314; and Telecommunications Act §5 254 (e) CC Docket No. 96-45 Dear Ms. Boyd:Boyd: On November 18, 2011 the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") released its USF/ICC Transformation Order in WC Docket No. 10-90 et al. With that Order, the FCC began a transition toto a national framework for certification of Eligible Telecommunications Carriers ("ETCs") and setset forth a standard set of information that all ETCs must file by April 1 of each year. The Order also requiredrequired ETCs to provide thethe same informationinformation to the respective state commissions. In subsequent orders, issued on February 3, and May 14, 2012, the FCC modified certain ofof the reporting requirements to comply with the federal Paperwork Reduction Act and revisedrevised its rules toto move the annual filing date to July I1 of each year For 2012,2012, ETCs must filefile information that fulfills 47 C.F.R. 54.313(a)(2) through (a)(6)(a)(6) to the extentextent thethe informationinformation has been collected pursuant to state ETC certification requirements and 47 C.F.R. 54.313(h) by July 2,2, 2012. CenturyLink hereby provides the informationinformation that fulfills 47 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBIT 1 Centurylink Subsidary List CENTURYLINK, INC
    EXHIBIT 1 CenturyLink Subsidary List CENTURYLINK, INC. List of Subsidiaries (As of February 13, 2012) Subsidiary Actel, LLC Bloomingdale Telephone Company, Inc. Century Cellunet International, Inc. Cellunet of India Limited Century Interactive Fax, Inc. Century Telephone of West Virginia, Inc. CenturyTel Acquisition LLC CenturyTel of Adamsville, Inc. CenturyTel of Arkansas, Inc. CenturyTel Broadband Services, LLC CenturyTel TeleVideo, Inc. CenturyTelfTeleview of Wisconsin, Tnc. v Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. CenturyTel Broadband Wireless, LLC CenturyTel of Central Indiana, Inc. CenturyTel of Central Louisiana, LLC CenturyT el of Chatham, LLC CenturyTel of Chester, Inc. CenturyTel of Claiborne, Inc. CenturyTel of East Louisiana, LLC Centu1yTel of Evangeline, LLC Century Tel Fiber Company II, LLC CenturyTel Holdings, Inc. Century Marketing Solutions, LLC CenturyTel Arkansas Holdings, Inc. CentlllyTel of Central Arkansas, LLC CenturyTel ofNorthwest Arkansas, LLC Century Tel Holdings Alabama, lnc. Century Tel of Alabama LLC CenturyTe l Holdings Missouri, Inc. CenturyTel of Missouri, LLC ctl org struct\sublist.word - 1 - February 15, 2012 Subsidiary CenturyTel Investments of Texas, lnc. Century Tel of the Northwest, Inc. Brown Equipment Corp. Carter Company, Inc. Honomach PR, Inc. Cascade Autovon Company CcnturyTei/Cable Layers, Inc. CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel of Colorado, Inc. CenturyTel ofEagle, Inc. CenturyTel of Eastern Oregon, lnc. CenturyTel Entertainment, Inc. CenturyTel ofFairwater-Brandon-Aito, LLC Centu.ryTel of Forestville, LLC CenturyTel of the Gem State, Inc. CenturyTel oflnter Island, Inc. CenturyTel of Larsen-Readfield, LLC CenturyTel of the Midwest-Kendall, LLC CenturyTel of the Midwest-Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel ofMinnesota, Inc. CenturyTel of Monroe County, LLC CenturyTel of Montana, Inc. CenturyTel of Northern Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel ofNorthwest Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel of Oregon, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. FCC No. 95-334 In re Application of ) Alascom, Inc. AT&T Corporation ) and Pacific Telecom, Inc. ) For Transfer of Control of ) File No. W-P-C-7037 ALASCOM, Inc. ) et al. from Pacific Telecom, Inc. ) to AT&T Corporation ) ) and ) ) Application of Alascom, Inc. ) For Review of Authorization ) File No. W-P-C-6520 to Acquire and Operate a Fiber Optic ) Cable System between Alaska and ) Oregon for the Provision of ) Interstate Switched and ) Private Line Services ) ORDER AND AUTHORIZATION Adopted: August 1, 1995 Released: August 2, 1995 By the Commission: Table of Contents Paragraph I. INTRODUCTION...............................................1 II. BACKGROUND................................................4 III. THE APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL.................10 A. The Information Requirements............................10 i. Background............................................10 ii. Application..........................................11 iii. Comments............................................12 iv. Discussion...........................................13 B. Conformity with the Market Structure Order's Transition and Market Structure Requirements..........................14 i. Background............................................14 ii. Application..........................................15 iii. Comments............................................16 iv. Discussion...........................................19 C. Universal Service, Rate Integration and Revenue Requirement
    [Show full text]
  • The Results Center, Profile
    PacifiCorp Large Commercial Energy FinAnswer Profile #46 Executive Summary 2 Utility Overview 3 1991 PacifiCorp Statistics Table Utility DSM Overview 4 Pacific/Utah Power DSM Programs Table; Utility DSM Overview Table; Annual DSM Measure Funding Expenditure (chart); Annual Energy Savings (chart) Program Overview 6 Case Study: 1000 Broadway Building Portland, Oregon Implementation 9 Marketing; Delivery; Measures Installed; Staffing Requirements Monitoring and Evaluation 11 Program Savings 12 Savings Overview Table; Annual Energy Savings (chart); Cumulative Energy Savings (chart); Annual Peak Capacity Savings (chart); Cumulative Peak Capacity Savings (chart); Participation Rates; Participation Table; Annual Energy Savings per Participant (chart); Free Ridership; Measure Lifetime; Projected Savings Cost of the Program 15 Costs Overview Table; Total Program Cost (chart); Cost Effectiveness; Cost of Saved Energy Table; Costs Breakout Table; Cost per Participant; Cost Components; Cost Components (chart) Environmental Benefit Statement 18 Avoided Emissions Analysis Table Lessons Learned / Transferability 20 Regulatory Incentives / Shareholder Returns 21 References 23 1 Executive Summary Pacific/Utah Power, the electric generation and distribution divisions of PacifiCorp, is a forerunner in a new and innovative Energy FinAnswer type of efficiency program in which customers repay the costs of their efficiency installations through monthly energy service Utility: PacifiCorp charges on their electric bills. While the jury is still out on the Sector: Large Commercial effectiveness of this approach compared to more traditional Measures: Installation of energy-efficient rebate and other incentive programs, Pacific/Utah Power’s measures in new buildings. pioneering efforts with financing energy services for its custom- ers is a model that is being closely watched around the country. Mechanism: FinAnswer provides up-front capital for installation of energy- efficient Pacific/Utah Power classifies its DSM programs into one equipment that exceeds code.
    [Show full text]
  • GHIGINAL 000011572"4"' 1 BEFORE the ARIR(E*@€P.E([ATION Cu1v11v11§B1un
    .r ll \lllllllllllll IH GHIGINAL 000011572"4"' 1 BEFORE THE ARIR(E*@€P.E([ATION Cu1v11v11§b1un 2 An'2ona Corporation Commissfm 3 COMMISSIONERS 288) AUS V! A 98 35 DDCKETED <4 j*. 5) KRISTIN K. MAYES, Chairman w ¢** i s Cbu i". *p u »\ . 9 L.; Vs 1 4 GARY PIERCE *"" 4*/Uiu;= '3¥m.. 4 8 AUG 1 72010 DUCKET cos§*§'R+;§1. 1--»-»~_.. , ,- PAUL NEWMAN - , - - - 5 SANDRA D. KENNEDY DGGKFTED BY BOB STUMP I 6 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF DOCKET no. T-03632A-06-009 l 7 DIECA COMMUNICATIONS DBA COVAD T-03267A-06-009 l COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, ESCHELON T-04302A-06-0091 8 TELECOM OF ARIZONA, INC., MCLEODUSA T-03406A-06-0091 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC., T-03432A-06-0091 9 MOUNTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., T-01051B-06-0091 XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. AND 10 QWEST CORPORATION'S REQUEST FOR COMMISSION PROCESS TO ADDRESS KEY 11 UNE ISSUES ARISING FROM TRIENNIAL REVIEW REMAND ORDER, INCLUDING 12 APPROVAL OF WEST WIRE CENTER LISTS. PROCEDURAL ORDER 13 BY THE COMMISSION: 14 15 On May 20, 2008, in Decision No. 70355, the Arizona Corporation Commission 16 ("Commission") approved a Settlement Agreement between Qwest Corporation ("Qwest") and 17 DIECA Communications, Inc., doing business as Covad Communications Company and Mountain 18 Telecommunications, Inc. ("Covad"), Eschelon Telecom of Arizona, Inc. ("Eschelon"), McLeodUSA 19 Telecommunications Services, Inc. ("McLeod"), and XO Communications Services, Inc. ("XO") 20 (collectively "Joint CLECs"). The Settlement Agreement resolved issues between Qwest and the 21 Joint CLECs concerning Qwest's initial list of unimpaired wire centers, and established procedures 22 that would apply between the parties with respect to future Qwest filings to update the unimpaired 23 wire center list.
    [Show full text]
  • 921 SW Washington Street | Portland, OR
    921 SW Washington Street | Portland, OR 302,262 SF Carrier Hotel | 8 MW Capacity | Carrier Neutral Pittock Block is the crown jewel of Portland’s downtown area. It is recognized as an important regional IXP hub, as well as a direct subsea cable connection to the Asia Pacific market. This historic landmark has evolved over the years, transforming from an electric substation distribution location to a telecom hub to one of the densest connectivity hubs on the west coast today. Source: Pittock Team Seattle Hillsboro PITTOCK BLOCK Portland, OR With 16 fiber optic carriers, 179 other service providers, and seven subsea cables connecting the building’s global grade Internet Exchange with low average latency across Denver major U.S. markets, it is a key hub for companies seeking San Jose global access. Los Angeles Source: Pittock Team Why Pittock Block? . Internet Exchange Point for the Northwest . Gateway to Asia-Pacific market through direct access to seven subsea cables . One of the greatest densities of networks in the Pacific Northwest Total Size of Building Carriers On-Site . 8 stories . ABT Limited . P-MAN.NET (Internet 2) . Advanced Radio Telecom . PF.NET . 302,262 SF . American Digital Online . Quick Internet . 81,906 SF data center PDX NAP Services . Reflex Communications . AT&T Wireless Cellular . Santa Cruz . 12,839 SF telco / NNN Powered shell . Boulevard Media Telecommunications . Connect! . Solid Technologies . DSL Only, Inc. Supertracks Power . Earthlink . Teleport Internet . Edgix Services . 8 MW Capacity . Eschelon Telecommunications . Telesat International . On-site power generation . International Data . Telserv . 100% underground distribution Technologies . Universal Access . International Web . Universal .
    [Show full text]
  • Um 1484, Testimony & Exhibits, 9/21/2010
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE UM-1484 I certify that on September 21st, 2010, a true and correct copy of CenturyLink’s Rebuttal Testimony of John F. Jones, G. Clay Bailey, Todd Schafer and Michael R. Hunsucker, in Docket UM-1484, was served on the following parties via electronic mail and where paper service is not waived, by U.S. mail: W Charles L Best W Michel Singer Nelson Attorney At Law 360networks (USA) Inc. 1631 NE Broadway #538 370 Interlocken Blvd Ste 600 Portland, OR 97232-1425 Broomfield, CO 80021-8015 [email protected] [email protected] W Penny Stanley W Arthur A Butler - C/HC 360networks (USA) inc. Ater Wynne LLP 370 Interlocken Blvd Ste 600 601 Union Street, Ste 1501 Broomfield, CO 80021-8015 Seattle, WA 98101-3981 [email protected] [email protected] W Joel Paisner W Richard Stevens Ater Wynne LLP Central Telephone Inc. 601 Union St Ste 1501 PO Box 25 Seattle, WA 98101-2327 Goldendale, WA 98620 [email protected] [email protected] W John Felz W Michael R. Moore CenturyLink Charter Fiberlink OR – CCVII, LLC 5454 W 110th St KSOPKJ0502 12405 Powerscourt Dr. Overland Park, KS 66211 St. Louis, MO 63131 [email protected] [email protected] W Gordon Feighner - C W Robert Jenks - C/HC Citizens Utility Board of Oregon Citizens Utility Board of Oregon 610 SW Broadway, Ste 400 610 SW Broadway, Ste 400 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97205 [email protected] [email protected] W G. Catriona McCracken – C/HC W Raymond Myers – C/HC Citizens Utility Board of Oregon Citizens Utility Board of Oregon 610 SW Broadway, Ste 400 610 SW Broadway, Ste 400 Portland, OR 97205 Portland, OR 97205 [email protected] [email protected] W Kevin Elliott Parks – C/HC W David Hawker Citizens Utility Board of Oregon City of Lincoln City 610 SW Broadway, Ste 400 801 SW Highway 101 Portland, OR 97205 Lincoln City, OR 97367 [email protected] [email protected] W Douglas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibity Testimony of Jerome C. Weinert
    EXHIBITY TESTIMONY OF JEROME C. WEINERT BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION AQUA PENNSYLVANIA WASTEWATER, INC. DOCKET NO. A-2019-3009052 AQUA STATEMENT NO. 5 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JEROME C. WEINERT, PE, ASA, CDP UTILITY VALUATION EXPERT SELECTED BY EAST NORRITON TOWNSHIP July 30, 2019 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JEROME C. WEINERT 1 Q. Please state your name, business address, and occupation. 2 A. My name is Jerome C. Weinert. My business address is 8555 West Forest Home Avenue, 3 Suite 201, Greenfield, WI 53228. I am a Principal and Director of AUS Consultants. This 4 testimony was prepared by me. 5 6 Q. Please describe your qualifications and indicate if you are registered as a Utility 7 Valuation Expert with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. 8 A. A CV for Jerome C. Weinert is attached to my report and this testimony. I am a registered 9 Utility Valuation Expert with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. I obtained that 10 registration in 2016 and was informed of our renewal by the Pennsylvania PUC Secretary 11 on January 24, 2019. 12 13 Q. What is the purpose of your testimony? 14 A. This direct testimony provides clarification and explanation of the appraisal I provided to 15 East Norriton Township, the Selling Utility pursuant to 66 Pa. C.S. § 1329(a)(5) and in 16 accordance with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice 2018-2019 Edition. 17 18 Q. Are you advocating for any party or outcome? 19 A. No. The Ethics Rule of the USPAP, applicable here pursuant to 66 Pa. C.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Distance Carrier Code Assignments
    LONG DISTANCE CARRIER CODE ASSIGNMENTS Industry Analysis Division Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission June 1997 This report is available for reference in the Common Carrier Bureau's Public Reference Room, 2000 M Street, N.W., Room 575. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS) at (202) 857-3800. The report can be downloaded [file name LDC1Q97.ZIP] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC- State Link computer bulletin board system at (202) 418-0241. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE 1. NUMBER OF CARRIER IDENTIFICATION CODES ASSIGNED BY BELL COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH (FIRST QUARTER 1982 THROUGH FIRST QUARTER 1997) .......................................................... 8 TABLE 2. LIST OF FGB CIC CODE ASSIGNMENTS, SORTED BY CIC CODE ................ 9 TABLE 3. LIST OF FGB CIC CODE ASSIGNMENTS, SORTED BY ENTITY .................. 16 TABLE 4. LIST OF FGD CIC CODE ASSIGNMENTS, SORTED BY CIC CODE ................ 23 TABLE 5. LIST OF FGD CIC CODE ASSIGNMENTS, SORTED BY ENTITY .................. 33 TABLE 6. 500 CODE BALANCE SHEET (AS OF MARCH 31, 1997) ......................... 43 TABLE 7. NUMBER OF 500 CODES ASSIGNED (THIRD QUARTER 1994 THROUGH FIRST QUARTER 1997) .......................................................... 43 TABLE 8. LIST OF 500 CODE ASSIGNMENTS SORTED BY CODE ......................... 44 TABLE 9. LIST OF 500 CODE ASSIGNMENTS SORTED BY ENTITY ....................... 48 TABLE 10. 555 LINE NUMBER BALANCE SHEET (AS OF MARCH 31, 1997) .................. 52 TABLE 11. NUMBER OF 555 LINE NUMBERS ASSIGNED (SECOND QUARTER 1994 THROUGH FIRST QUARTER 1997) .......................................... 52 TABLE 12. LIST OF 555 LINE NUMBER ASSIGNMENTS SORTED BY LINE NUMBER ........
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Centurylink, Inc
    CENTURYLINK, INC. (Current as of November 1, 2017) State or Jurisdiction of Subsidiary Incorporation Actel, LLC Delaware BloomingdaleTelephoneCompany,Inc. Michigan CenturyCellunetInternational,Inc. Louisiana CellunetofIndiaLimited Mauritius CenturyTelephoneofWestVirginia,Inc. WestVirginia CenturyLink–ClarkeM.WilliamsFoundation Colorado CenturyLinkCommunications,LLC Delaware Cognilytics,Inc. California Cognilytics Software and Consulting Private Limited India ElasticBox,Inc. Delaware netAura,LLC Delaware QwestInternationalServicesCorporation Delaware CenturyLink do Brasil Participaҫões Ltda. Brazil CenturyLink Comunicaҫões Ltda. Brazil SAVVISdoBrasilLtda. Brazil SavvisTelecomunicaçõesLtda. Brazil QwestNLimitedPartnership Delaware QwestTransoceanic,Inc. Delaware Qwest Communications International Ltd. United Kingdom CenturyLinkLimited UnitedKingdom CenturyLinkAustriaGmbH Austria Qwest Holdings, BV Netherlands CenturyLinkBelgiumSprl Belgium Qwest France SAS France QwestGermanyGmbH Germany QwestNetherlandsBV Netherlands QwestPeruS.R.L. Peru QwestTelecommunicationsAsia,Limited HongKong Qwest Australia Pty Limited Australia QwestCommunicationsJapanCorporation Japan QwestCommunicationsKorea,Limited Korea 1 State or Jurisdiction of Subsidiary Incorporation QwestHongKongTelecommunications,Limited HongKong Qwest Singapore Pte Ltd. Singapore QwestTaiwanTelecommunications,Limited Taiwan SEALConsulting,Inc. NewJersey AppFog,Inc. Delaware CenturyLinkEuropeB.V. Netherlands CenturyLinkEuropeB.V.,TheNetherlands,filialSweden Sweden CenturyLinkEuropeB.V.,SucursalenEspaña
    [Show full text]
  • CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT (With Demand for Jury)
    DISTRICT COURT, OTERO COUNTY, COLORADO Sixteenth Judicial District Court Otero County Courthouse 13 W. 3RD Street, Room 207 La Junta, CO 81050-1536 Tele: 719-384-4981 Fax: 719-384-4991 COURT USE ONLY Plaintiff: Wesley Colvin Case Number: v. Div.: Ctrm.: Defendant: Qwest Communications International, Inc. (Attorney for Plaintiff) Curtis L. Kennedy 8405 E. Princeton Ave. Denver, CO 80237-1741 Phone: (303) 770-0440 Fax: (303) 843-0360 Email: [email protected] Atty. Reg. #: 12351 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT (with Demand for Jury) PLAINTIFF WESLEY COLVIN, by and through his counsel, Curtis L. Kennedy, files this Class Action Complaint: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. For many decades, Qwest Communications International, Inc. (and predecessor Bell Telephone companies) contracted to provide retirees with a “Telephone Concession Reimbursement” payable throughout retirement and for two months after death. Qwest and its predecessors have a long history of treating the “Telephone Concession Reimbursement” as a lifetime contract payable from operating revenues. However, most recently Defendant Qwest terminated its long standing contract with more than 4,500 retirees. Accordingly, efforts were made by countless retirees to have the “Telephone Concession Reimbursement” reinstated, but Qwest gave written confirmation that it was sticking by its decision to terminate the contract. Therefore, this is a class action complaint for breach of contract and promissory estoppel. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. The Otero County District Court has subject matter jurisdiction of the claims for relief based upon breach of contract and promissory estoppel. 3. Venue of this action lies in this district court since the acts complained of herein occurred within this County where the subject matter contract – “Telephone Concession Reimbursement” – was to be performed by Qwest and paid to Plaintiff residing in this County.
    [Show full text]
  • March 1, 2019 Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications
    REDACTED – FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION John E. Benedict Vice President - Federal Regulatory Affairs & Regulatory Counsel 1099 New York Avenue NW, Suite 250 Washington, DC 20001 202.429.31 14 March 1, 2019 Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: In the Matter of Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services , WC Docket No. 12-375 Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to the Commission’s Second Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking , released November 5, 2015, and the Public Notice of February 14, 2019, CenturyLink Public Communications, Inc. (CPCI) provides its response to the Second One-Time Mandatory Data Collection. 1 CPCI submits its data under the terms of the Protective Order of December 19, 2013.2 CPCI is designating certain information contained in the spreadsheets as Confidential and thus requests that it not be made available for public inspection. Each page of the non-redacted version of CPCI’s spreadsheets is marked as follows: “ CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER IN WC DOCKET NO. 12-375 BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION .” 1 Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services , WC Dkt. 13-275, Second Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC Rcd. 12763 (2015), vacated and remanded in part , Global Tel*Link v. FCC, 859 F.2d 39 (D.C. Cir. 2017); Public Notice, DA 19- 85 (Feb. 14, 2019). 2 Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services , WC Dkt. 13-275, Protective Order, DA 13-2434 (Dec. 19, 2013). Marlene Dortch March 1, 2019 Page 2 Attached to this letter, as requested in the instructions for the Mandatory Data Collection, CPCI is providing a Description and Justification to clarify or explain aspects of its data submission.
    [Show full text]