Long Distance Carrier Code Assignments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Long Distance Carrier Code Assignments LONG DISTANCE CARRIER CODE ASSIGNMENTS Industry Analysis Division Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission June 1997 This report is available for reference in the Common Carrier Bureau's Public Reference Room, 2000 M Street, N.W., Room 575. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS) at (202) 857-3800. The report can be downloaded [file name LDC1Q97.ZIP] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC- State Link computer bulletin board system at (202) 418-0241. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE 1. NUMBER OF CARRIER IDENTIFICATION CODES ASSIGNED BY BELL COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH (FIRST QUARTER 1982 THROUGH FIRST QUARTER 1997) .......................................................... 8 TABLE 2. LIST OF FGB CIC CODE ASSIGNMENTS, SORTED BY CIC CODE ................ 9 TABLE 3. LIST OF FGB CIC CODE ASSIGNMENTS, SORTED BY ENTITY .................. 16 TABLE 4. LIST OF FGD CIC CODE ASSIGNMENTS, SORTED BY CIC CODE ................ 23 TABLE 5. LIST OF FGD CIC CODE ASSIGNMENTS, SORTED BY ENTITY .................. 33 TABLE 6. 500 CODE BALANCE SHEET (AS OF MARCH 31, 1997) ......................... 43 TABLE 7. NUMBER OF 500 CODES ASSIGNED (THIRD QUARTER 1994 THROUGH FIRST QUARTER 1997) .......................................................... 43 TABLE 8. LIST OF 500 CODE ASSIGNMENTS SORTED BY CODE ......................... 44 TABLE 9. LIST OF 500 CODE ASSIGNMENTS SORTED BY ENTITY ....................... 48 TABLE 10. 555 LINE NUMBER BALANCE SHEET (AS OF MARCH 31, 1997) .................. 52 TABLE 11. NUMBER OF 555 LINE NUMBERS ASSIGNED (SECOND QUARTER 1994 THROUGH FIRST QUARTER 1997) .......................................... 52 TABLE 12. LIST OF 555 LINE NUMBER ASSIGNMENTS SORTED BY LINE NUMBER ......... 53 TABLE 13. LIST OF 555 LINE NUMBER ASSIGNMENTS SORTED BY ENTITY ................ 71 TABLE 14. TELEPHONE NUMBERS ASSIGNED FOR 800 SERVICE (APRIL 1993 THROUGH APRIL 1997) ............................................................. 89 TABLE 15. TELEPHONE NUMBERS ASSIGNED FOR 888 SERVICE (FEBRUARY 1996 THROUGH APRIL 1997) ................................................... 90 TABLE 16. 900 CODE BALANCE SHEET (AS OF MARCH 31, 1997) ......................... 91 TABLE 17. NUMBER OF 900 CODES ASSIGNED TO INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS (FIRST QUARTER 1987 THROUGH FIRST QUARTER 1997) ............................. 92 TABLE 18. LIST OF 900 CODE ASSIGNMENTS SORTED BY CODE ......................... 93 TABLE 19. LIST OF 900 CODE ASSIGNMENTS SORTED BY ENTITY ....................... 96 LONG DISTANCE CARRIER CODE ASSIGNMENTS This report contains information on carrier identification codes (CICs) and other telecommunications numbering resources. The information in this report is used within the telephone industry and by users of telephone services for a variety of purposes. CICs are used within the telephone industry to, among other things, identify particular long distance carriers and other access customers in order to bill and route traffic to them. As part of carrier access codes, CICs are also used by customers to reach alternative carriers, such as "dial-around" long distance providers. The separate codes assigned to providers of 500 and 900 services are used by local telephone companies to direct calls to the service provider. Both residential and business customers frequently seek information from the Commission about these codes to identify particular service providers. Manufacturers require information on numbering resources to design and produce telecommunications equipment efficiently. Vendors of equipment frequently seek information on the growth of numbering resources to estimate potential demand. Major corporations and government agencies that operate their own telecommunications networks need information on numbering resources to efficiently interconnect their networks with the public switched network. More generally, the evolution of numbering resources provides insight into the development of competition in the long distance market. This report presents brief background information on the administration of numbering resources and then summarizes the information specifically related to carrier identification codes, 500 service, 555 line number assignments, 800 and 888 service, and 900 service. Numbering Resources Administration The North American Numbering Plan (NANP) is the basic format for telephone numbers in the United States (including Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands), Canada, Bermuda and the following Caribbean countries: Anguilla, Antigua, Bahamas, Barbados, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Jamaica, Montserrat, St. Kitts & Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Turks & Caicos Islands, and Trinidad & Tobago. Each telephone number within the NANP is a unique ten-digit number that consists of three parts. The first is a three-digit code -- the Numbering Plan Area or "NPA" code, which usually identifies a specific geographic area and is usually simply called an "area code". In other cases, the first three digits provide caller access to unique services (e.g., 500, 800, 888, and 900 service). The last two parts of each ten-digit number are a three-digit central office code and a four-digit line number. Together, these seven digits usually make up an ordinary local telephone number. In some cases, such as 500 and 900 service, the office code has special uses other than identifying the geographic location of a central office. In the following discussion, the three-digit central office code is sometimes referred to as the "office code" or the "NXX" code. Section 251 (e)(1) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which amends the Communications Act of 1934, requires that the Federal Communications Commission "create or designate one or more impartial entities to administer telecommunications numbering and to make such numbers available on an equitable basis." Section 251(e)(1) also clarifies that the FCC has "exclusive jurisdiction over those portions of the North American Numbering Plan that pertain to the United States . [but does not] preclude the Commission from delegating to State commissions or other entities all or any portion of such jurisdiction." The Network Services Division of the Commission's Common Carrier Bureau oversees numbering resource matters. The NANP was introduced by AT&T in 1947. AT&T administered the NPA codes centrally, and the local exchange carriers administered the NXX codes and line numbers. After the AT&T divestiture in 1984, Bell Communications Research (Bellcore) assumed the centralized number administration functions. On July 13, 1995, the Commission adopted a new model for administration of the NANP, announcing its intention to establish the North American Numbering Council (NANC), a federal advisory committee.1 The NANC will, among other tasks, advise the Commission and other NANP governments on numbering issues (such as local number portability implementation), recommend selection of and guide an impartial NANP Administrator, and conduct initial resolution of certain numbering disputes. The NANP Administrator selected by the NANC will process number resource applications and maintain administrative numbering databases. Operational details and additional activities of the NANP Administrator are to be determined by the NANC. Additional information about the NANC is available from the Commission's internet site at (http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/Nanc). Carrier Identification Codes CICs are numeric codes that, as originally devised, enabled local exchange carriers (LECs), as providers of interexchange access services, to identify access customers in order to bill and route traffic to such customers.2 Bellcore, as the current NANP Administrator, assigns these codes using guidelines developed by the Industry Carriers Compatibility Forum (ICCF), under the auspices of the Carrier Liaison Committee (CLC) which is sponsored by the Alliance for Telecommunications Solutions (ATIS), an industry forum. Currently, the Industry Numbering 1 See Administration of the North American Numbering Plan, CC Docket No. 92-237, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 2588 (1995). 2 Access providers are typically local exchange carriers that provide access customers with circuits that interconnect to the local carrier's public switched telephone network. Access customers include interexchange carriers, wireless carriers, competitive access providers, and large corporate users. Commission rules require that "interstate access services should be made available on a non-discriminatory basis and, as far as possible, without distinction between end user and IC [interexchange carrier] customers." Petition of First Data Resources, Inc., Regarding the Availability of Feature Group B Access Service to End Users, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 1986 WL 291786, (1986), released May 28,1986 (First Data Resources Order) at para. 13. 2 Committee (INC), a subcommittee of the ICCF, develops these guidelines. The most recent version of these guidelines was issued in September 1996.3 Currently, CICs are used for purposes beyond those for which they were originally designed. CICs facilitate competition by enabling callers to use the services of any number of telecommunications service providers. For example, they enable callers to reach any carrier (presubscribed or otherwise) from any telephone, by dialing a carrier access code that includes
Recommended publications
  • Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from__________ to __________ Commission File No.: 000-09881 SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia 54-1162807 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 500 Shentel Way, Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (540) 984-4141 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: Common Stock (No Par Value) SHEN NASDAQ Global Select Market 49,932,073 (The number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding on (Title of Class) (Trading Symbol) (Name of Exchange on which Registered) February 23, 2021) SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: NONE Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Des Sources Europresse Au 1Er Octobre 2016
    Liste des sources Europresse au 1er octobre 2016 Document confidentiel, liste sujette à changement, les embargos sont imposés par les éditeurs, le catalogue intégral est disponible en ligne : www.europresse.com puis "sources" et "nos sources en un clin d'œil" Source Pdf Embargo texte Embargo pdf Langue Pays Périodicité ISSN Début archives Fin archives 01 net oui Français France Mensuel ou bimensuel 1276-519X 2005/01/10 01 net - Hors-série oui Français France Mensuel ou bimensuel 2014/04/01 100 Mile House Free Press (South Cariboo) Anglais Canada Hebdomadaire 0843-0403 2008/04/09 18h, Le (site web) Français France Quotidien 2006/01/04 2014/02/18 2 Rives, Les (Sorel-Tracy, QC) oui 7 jours 7 jours Français Canada Hebdomadaire 2013/04/09 2 Rives, Les (Sorel-Tracy, QC) (site web) 7 jours Français Canada Hebdomadaire 2004/01/06 20 Minutes (site web) Français France Quotidien 2006/01/30 24 Heures (Suisse) oui Français Suisse Quotidien 2005/07/07 24 heures Montréal 1 jour Français Canada Quotidien 2012/04/04 24 hours Calgary Anglais Canada Quotidien 2012/04/05 2013/08/02 24 hours Edmonton Anglais Canada Quotidien 2012/04/05 2013/08/02 24 hours Ottawa Anglais Canada Quotidien 2012/04/02 2013/08/02 24 hours Toronto 1 jour Anglais Canada Quotidien 2012/04/05 24 hours Vancouver 1 jour Anglais Canada Quotidien 2012/04/05 24 x 7 News (Bahrain) (web site) Anglais Bahreïn Quotidien 2016/09/04 3BL Media Anglais États-Unis En continu 2013/08/23 40-Mile County Commentator, The oui 7 jours 7 jours Anglais Canada Hebdomadaire 2001/09/04 40-Mile County Commentator, The (blogs) 1 jour Anglais Canada Quotidien 2012/05/08 2016/05/31 40-Mile County Commentator, The (web site) 7 jours Anglais Canada Hebdomadaire 2011/03/02 2016/05/31 98.5 FM (Montréal, QC) (réf.
    [Show full text]
  • ITC Deltacom
    AT&T Kentucky T: 502.582.8219 @at&t 601 W. Chestnut Street F: 502.582.1573 Room 407 [email protected] Louisville, KY 40203 July 22, 2008 Ms. Stephanie Stumbo Executive Director Public Service Commission 211 Sower Boulevard P. 0. Box 615 Frankfort, KY 40602 Re: Filing of Amendments Dear Ms. Stumbo: Enclosed for filing is a CD-ROM containing the following Amendments. These documents have been electronically filed with the Commission. Business Telecom, Inc. Interconnection Amendment /qq7- oo!>OB P.C.B. Communications, Inc. Case No. 00056 .. flM !B Resale Amendment Case No. 00592 -AM tP~ ITC"DeltaCom Communications, Inc. Interconnection Amendment Jef11 .. 0()130 TelCove Operations, Inc. Case No. 00141-At'k /1 Interconnection Amendment 2£()0-00tf1/ Case No. 00354 --A-M.. ¢Jq MClmetro Access Transmission Services, LLC Interconnection Amendment /qqtp-oo4!tl Case No. 00038-11'11. Jl Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Enclosure 716384 ~ Pmud \pof•MW of lht! u fJ. Olympk Tt\1m AMENDMENT TO EXTEND TERM DATE/AT&T-9STATE PAGE 1 of 1 DeltaCom - KY VERSION - 03/05/08 AMENDMENT TO INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT UNDER SECTIONS 251 AND 252 OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996 BETWEEN BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a AT&T ALABAMA, AT&T FLORIDA, AT&T GEORGIA, AT&T KENTUCKY, AT&T LOUISIANA, AT&T MISSISSIPPI, AT&T NORTH CAROLINA, AT&T SOUTH CAROLINA AND AT&T TENNESSEE AND ITC^DELTACOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a ITC^DELTACOM D/B/A GRAPEVINE The Interconnection Agreement dated December 5, 2003 by and between BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-06-11A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 05-255 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: February 10, 2006 Released: March 3, 2006 Comment Date: April 3, 2006 Reply Comment Date: April 18, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, and Tate issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of this Report......................................................................................................................... 2 B. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2005 ................................................................................... 4 2. General Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Specific Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING ......... 27 A. Cable Television Service ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Not for Immediate Release
    Contact: Name Dan Gaydou Email [email protected] Phone 616-222-5818 DIGITAL NEWS AND INFORMATION COMPANY, MLIVE MEDIA GROUP ANNOUNCED TODAY New Company to Serve Communities Across Michigan with Innovative Digital and Print Media Products. Key Support Services to be provided by Advance Central Services Michigan. Grand Rapids, Michigan – Nov. 2, 2011 – Two new companies – MLive Media Group and Advance Central Services Michigan – will take over the operations of Booth Newspapers and MLive.com, it was announced today by Dan Gaydou, president of MLive Media Group. The Michigan-based entities, which will begin operating on February 2, 2012, will serve the changing news and information needs of communities across Michigan. MLive Media Group will be a digital-first media company that encompasses all content, sales and marketing operations for its digital and print properties in Michigan, including all current newspapers (The Grand Rapids Press, The Muskegon Chronicle, The Jackson Citizen Patriot, The Flint Journal, The Bay City Times, The Saginaw News, Kalamazoo Gazette, AnnArbor.com, Advance Weeklies) and the MLive.com and AnnArbor.com web sites. “The news and advertising landscape is changing fast, but we are well-positioned to use our talented team and our long record of journalistic excellence to create a dynamic, competitive, digitally oriented news operation,” Gaydou said. “We will be highly responsive to the changing needs of our audiences, and deliver effective options for our advertisers and business partners. We are excited about our future and confident this new company will allow us to provide superior news coverage to our readers – online, on their phone or tablet, and in print.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89-65
    4 FCC Red No. 3 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89-65 3. On the basis of the statements contained in the Before the parties' joint motion, we conclude that there are no long­ Federal Communications Commission er issues in controversy and the proceedings should be Washington, D.C. 20554 terminated. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to author­ ity delegated in Section 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, In the Matter of 47 C.F.R. § 0.291, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss filed by AT&T and Centel IS GRANTED. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-cap­ Complainant, tioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and these proceedings ARE HEREBY TERMINATED. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CENTRAL TELEPHONE File Nos. E-88-67 COMPANY OF TEXAS, CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-68 Gregory J. Vogt COMPANY OF OHIO, Chief, Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-69 COMPANY - MINNESOTA and CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-70 COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendants. ORDER Adopted: January 23, 1989; Released: February 2, 1989 By the Chief, Enforcement Division, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. We have before us a joint motion filed December 28, 1988 by AT&T Communications (AT&T) and Central Telephone Company of Texas, Central Telephone Com­ pany of Ohio, Central Telephone Company - Minnesota and Central Telephone Company of Illinois (collectively "Centel"), requesting that we dismiss with prejudice the above-captioned complaint proceedings and approve the parties' settlement agreement. 2. These proceedings were initiated by formal com­ plaints filed by AT&T against Centel on April 22, 1988 alleging that the defendants' earnings for interstate access services for the period October 1, 1985 through Decem­ ber 31, 1986, exceeded the rate of return authorized by the Commission in Authorized Rates of Return for Inter­ state Services for AT & T and Exchange Telephone Car­ riers, CC Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Interconnection and Local Competition”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No
    Please cite this paper as: OECD (2001-02-07), “Interconnection and Local Competition”, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 53, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/234147353518 OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 53 Interconnection and Local Competition OECD Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2000)3/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 07-Feb-2001 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2000)3/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies INTERCONNECTION AND LOCAL COMPETITION English - Or. English JT00102317 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d’origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2000)3/FINAL FOREWORD This report was discussed by the Working Party on Telecommunications and Information Services Policy (TISP) in May 2000 and subsequently declassified by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP). This report was prepared by Mr. Wonki Min of the OECD’s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. It is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. Copyright OECD, 2001 Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this material should be made to: Head of Publications Services,
    [Show full text]
  • Ogden Telephone Company Article I Scope and Intent of Agreement
    INCUMBENT LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIER INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN GTE NORTH INCORPORATED AND OGDEN TELEPHONE COMPANY ARTICLE I SCOPE AND INTENT OF AGREEMENT ............................................. I-1 ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS ...................................................................II-1 1. General Definitions ..............................................................II-1 1.1 "Act" ...................................................................II-1 1.2 "Affiliate" ...............................................................II-1 1.3 "AMA" ..................................................................II-1 1.4 "Applicable Law" ........................................................II-1 1.5 "Automatic Number Identification" or "ANI" .................................II-1 1.6 "Bellcore" ..............................................................II-1 1.7 "Bill-and-Keep Arrangement" ..............................................II-1 1.8 "Business Day" .........................................................II-1 1.9 "CLLI codes" ............................................................II-1 1.10 "Commercial Mobile Radio Services" (CMRS) ................................II-1 1.11 "Commission" ...........................................................II-2 1.12 "Common Channel Signaling" or "CCS" ....................................II-2 1.13 "Competitive Local Exchange Carrier" (CLEC) ...............................II-2 1.14 "compliance" ...........................................................II-2 1.15 "Customer"
    [Show full text]
  • Sprint Terms and Acronyms
    User Guide Sprint Terms and Acronyms All terms and conditions detailed in these Guidelines are subject to change pending future action by the FCC or individual state regulatory commissions. 2 Contents A..............................................................3 B ..............................................................4 C ..............................................................4 D .............................................................6 E ..............................................................7 F ..............................................................8 G..............................................................8 H..............................................................8 I ...............................................................8 J ..............................................................8 L ..............................................................8 M ...........................................................10 N ...........................................................10 O............................................................11 P ............................................................12 R ...........................................................12 S ............................................................13 T ............................................................14 U............................................................14 W...........................................................14 X............................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Broadband Enhance Council 2020 Annual Report
    2020 West Virginia Broadband Enhancement Council 2020 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing, Continuing and New Initiatives ............................................................................................... 2 3. Broadband Mapping ............................................................................................................................. 4 Key Components of the Interactive Mapping System .................................................................. 4 Broadband Advertised Speed Ranges Interactive Map ................................................................ 5 Broadband Development Hub ...................................................................................................... 6 Public Wi-Fi Map ........................................................................................................................... 6 Public Project Development ......................................................................................................... 7 Speed Tiers by County ................................................................................................................... 8 Speed Tiers Statewide ................................................................................................................... 8 Providers Statewide .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Centurylink™TM Columbia, SC 29201 Tel:Tel 803.252.4505803 252Rt505
    - / 38- E1 Fp~ 1122 Lady Street, Suite 1050 CenturyLiakCenturyLink™TM Columbia, SC 29201 Tel:Tel 803.252.4505803 252rt505 VIA HAND DELIVERY June 29, 2012 Jocelyn D. Boyd, Esquire Chief Clerk and Administrator Public Service Commission of SouthSouth Carolina 101 Executive Center Drive, Suite 100 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 Re: Certification of the Use of Universal Service Funds pursuant to 4747 C.F.R. §§55 54.313, 54.314;54,314; and Telecommunications Act §5 254 (e) CC Docket No. 96-45 Dear Ms. Boyd:Boyd: On November 18, 2011 the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") released its USF/ICC Transformation Order in WC Docket No. 10-90 et al. With that Order, the FCC began a transition toto a national framework for certification of Eligible Telecommunications Carriers ("ETCs") and setset forth a standard set of information that all ETCs must file by April 1 of each year. The Order also requiredrequired ETCs to provide thethe same informationinformation to the respective state commissions. In subsequent orders, issued on February 3, and May 14, 2012, the FCC modified certain ofof the reporting requirements to comply with the federal Paperwork Reduction Act and revisedrevised its rules toto move the annual filing date to July I1 of each year For 2012,2012, ETCs must filefile information that fulfills 47 C.F.R. 54.313(a)(2) through (a)(6)(a)(6) to the extentextent thethe informationinformation has been collected pursuant to state ETC certification requirements and 47 C.F.R. 54.313(h) by July 2,2, 2012. CenturyLink hereby provides the informationinformation that fulfills 47 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers
    Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers November 1997 Jim Lande Katie Rangos Industry Analysis Division Common Carrier Bureau Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 This report is available for reference in the Common Carrier Bureau's Public Reference Room, 2000 M Street, N.W. Washington DC, Room 575. Copies may be purchased by calling International Transcription Service, Inc. at (202) 857-3800. The report can also be downloaded [file name LOCAT-97.ZIP] from the FCC-State Link internet site at http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/stats on the World Wide Web. The report can also be downloaded from the FCC-State Link computer bulletin board system at (202) 418-0241. Carrier Locator: Interstate Service Providers Contents Introduction 1 Table 1: Number of Carriers Filing 1997 TRS Fund Worksheets 7 by Type of Carrier and Type of Revenue Table 2: Telecommunications Common Carriers: 9 Carriers that filed a 1997 TRS Fund Worksheet or a September 1997 Universal Service Worksheet, with address and customer contact number Table 3: Telecommunications Common Carriers: 65 Listing of carriers sorted by carrier type, showing types of revenue reported for 1996 Competitive Access Providers (CAPs) and 65 Competitive Local Exchange Carriers (CLECs) Cellular and Personal Communications Services (PCS) 68 Carriers Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) 83 Local Exchange Carriers (LECs) 86 Paging and Other Mobile Service Carriers 111 Operator Service Providers (OSPs) 118 Other Toll Service Providers 119 Pay Telephone Providers 120 Pre-paid Calling Card Providers 129 Toll Resellers 130 Table 4: Carriers that are not expected to file in the 137 future using the same TRS ID because of merger, reorganization, name change, or leaving the business Table 5: Carriers that filed a 1995 or 1996 TRS Fund worksheet 141 and that are unaccounted for in 1997 i Introduction This report lists 3,832 companies that provided interstate telecommunications service as of June 30, 1997.
    [Show full text]