Discussion on Open Judgment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Discussion on Open Judgment LONDON INITIATIVE Public Policy Think Tank Report Date: October 28, 2020 Report on Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) Proscription in the U.K. Under Terrorism Act, 2000 Discussion on Open Judgment By Neville Hewage, Ph.D. Canada Jayaraj Palihawadena, LLB, Solicitor U.K. 1 Authors are thankful to Public Policy Research Group of the Ontario Centre for Policy Research, Canada for their support for the report. www.policy-research.ca Canada 2 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Neville Hewage, Ph.D. (Canada) Dr. Hewage is an Adjunct Professor and Research Fellow at the International Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Law at Laurentian University, Ontario, Canada. He obtained his doctorate from Laurentian University, Canada. Dr. Hewage is also served as a Senior Policy Analyst at the Ontario Centre for Policy Research (OCPR), Ottawa, Canada. OCPR is a Think Tank involved in research on public policy, global terrorism, and extremist violence.OCPR provides support to prepare a strategic framework for countering terrorism and targeted violence to its stakeholders. The Strategic Framework introduces a mechanism for crafting a new definition of the critical concept of targeted violence, which will further help to ensure a common understanding of the threat, allowing for better discussion, approaches to mitigation, and resource allocation. Dr. Hewage is also on the Infrastructure Protection and International Security (MISIP) program, Norman Paterson School of International Affairs, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. For over 40 years, The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs (NPSIA) has been training Canada’s best and brightest graduate students in international affairs. Contact Mailing Address Ontario Centre for Policy Research 2581 River Mist Road, Ottawa, ON, K2J 6G1 CANADA. Tel: + 1 613 612 7615 e-mail: [email protected] OR [email protected] Jayaraj Palihawadana, LLB, Solicitor (UK) Mr. Palihawadana obtained a Bachelor of Law (LLB) from the Open University of Sri Lanka. He is a practicing lawyer in the U.K. He has vast experience in litigation, conflict resolution and transnational politics. Mr. Palihawadana is an activist, and his most recent role is being in the Human Rights Commission as an Ambassador to the U.K. Contact Mailing address London Initiative 08 Throne Road, Slough, SL3 7UQ U.K. Tel: + 44 7517 727933 email: [email protected] OR [email protected] 3 Contents Description Page About the Authours 3 Contents 4 Executive Summary 5 Part I – Review of Open Judgement 6 Background 6 Facts 7 Issues 9 Statutory Framework 10 Issues 1 and Issue 3 11 Analysis and Discussion 11 Affiliation with global terror network 11 Money Laundering for Terrorism 13 Human Smuggling 13 Tamil Eelam Cyber Force 14 Rationale 14 Belief or Suspicion 15 Issue 2 and Issue 3 16 Analysis and Discussion 16 LTTE Events Promotes or encourage terrorism and unlawful 17 glorification Conclusion 21 Part II – LTTE as a threat to social order and British Society 22 Radicalization 24 Abusing the U.K. asylum system 25 Part III Current Judicial proceedings against LTTE 27 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A transnational terrorist group, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), is one of the world’s most ruthless and wealthiest terrorist groups. Group’s annual income is about US$300 million. They have raised funds from human smuggling, associated with other terror groups by selling and smuggling weapons, money laundering, drug trafficking and other illegal activities. Proscribed Organizations Appeal Commission (POAC) also heard that LTTE international network is still intact, even when the group was militarily defeated. Our report highlights LTTE’s international terror network. It has raised serious questions of facts that need to be considered before deproscription. However, POAC failed to evaluate these facts in its decision. When preparing Part I of the report, we have not considered LTTE’s violent past. We have evaluated the most current activities of the LTTE. LTTE’s past activities have been analyzed to determine the group’s pattern of conduct. We have concluded that it is reasonable to believe LTTE is concerned with terrorism pursuant to s 5 (3) (d) of Terrorism Act, 2000. Therefore, its proscription should remain and include in schedule 2. Part II of the report provides a briefing of how the LTTE activities threaten the social order and British society. Tamil gangs are a result of the refugee crisis created by the LTTE. Tamil gangs are involved with credit card scams and street violence. Coercion by the LTTE has become a widespread problem in the U.K.’s Tamil enclaves. This is particularly troubling since many of the Tamil refugees in the U.K. originally fled Sri Lanka because of the LTTE's persecution, not by the ruling majority. Thus, a peculiar arrangement now exists in the U.K.’s Tamil enclaves, with persecutors entrenched among their victims in a distant receiving state. In this case, refugee status has failed to deliver the protection it promises to the persecuted. Part III of the report provides the most recent court cases against LTTE as a result of their failed attempt to revive the organization. However, vigilant security and intelligence apparatus in Sri Lanka were able to thaw LTTE attempts. Transnational organized terrorist group LTTE and their network will pose serious and growing threats to British citizens' security. LTTE and its global criminal enterprise will contribute to increased social violence, erode governments’ authorities, undermine the integrity of international financial systems and security. The report also highlights how deproscription will result in a massive influx of asylum seekers. LTTE’s international human smuggling network is ready to bring thousands of asylum seekers to the U.K. Finally, the deproscription of the transnational terror group LTTE should be considered not only legal means, how it will affect the public and foreign policy of the U.K., in a broader concept. 5 PART I REVIEW OF OPEN JUDGEMENT BACKGROUND 01 The transnational terror group, Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), represents a particularly violent manifestation of the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. The group threatens Sri Lanka and India's domestic stability and the security of the international system as a whole.1 The LTTE is a terrorist group fighting for a separate mono-ethnic Tamil state in the North and East of Sri Lanka. The LTTE's International Secretariat is based in the U.K. and is responsible for its press releases. The U.K. is also a source of funds for the LTTE. 02. The Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE) advocates for a separate Tamil state but does not have widespread support within Sri Lanka. Most Tamils have more pressing concerns such as housing, employment, land return and accessing information about relatives who disappeared during the armed conflict. 2 03. There have been three earlier applications to remove the LTTE from Schedule 2. They were all refused; the most recent was in 2014. 04. Five members of the Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE); Arumugam, and others appealed against a decision of the Secretary of State dated March 08, 2019, to refuse their application to remove the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam from the list of organizations proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000. 1 Chalk, P. Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam’s (LTTE) International Organization and Operations - A Preliminary Analysis, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CISIS), Commentary 77. https://fas.org/irp/world/para/docs/com77e.htm#N_1_ 2 Report of a Home Office fact-finding mission to Sri Lanka (January 20, 2020) Home Office, UK. (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil e/859277/Sri_Lanka_FFM_report_2020.pdf 6 05. The proscribed Organizations Appeal Commission (POAC) held that the decision is flawed. The commission, therefore, allowed the appeal. 06. To continue the proscription of the organization (LTTE), their activities must contravene with s 3 (5) (d) the Terrorism Act 2000 at the time of the submission and to date. FACTS 07. The U.S. Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism for 2014 states that "[d]espite its military defeat at the hands of the Sri Lankan government in 2009, the LTTE's international network of sympathizers and financial support persists". 3 08. According to a list of "terrorist entities" published by the Government of Canada's Department of Public Safety, "[a]lthough the LTTE was militarily defeated in May 2009, subversion, destabilization, and fundraising continues, particularly in the diaspora." 4 09. In 2016, the police recovered two separate stocks of explosives and a suicide kit, leading to the arrest of approximately twenty-five people, including five former LTTE leaders.5 10. The UNHRC, U.N. Refugee Agency Refworld reported (published by U.S. Department of State) that….[t]otal of thirteen LTTE supporters, several of whom had allegedly planned attacks against U.S. and Israeli diplomatic facilities in India, were arrested in Malaysia in 2014. Additional members were arrested in Malaysia and India in 2015, one of whom was accused of exhorting other Sri Lankans to fund and revive the LTTE. LTTE's financial support network 3 United States (US). June 2015. Department of State. "Sri Lanka." Country Reports on Terrorism 2014. https://www.refworld.org/docid/5bcf1f33a.html 4 Canada. 20 November 2014. Public Safety Canada. "Currently Listed Entities: Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)." https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cntr-trrrsm/lstd-ntts/crrnt-lstd-ntts- en.aspx#46 5 Country Reports on Terrorism 2016, (2017). Us Department of State. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2016/ 7 continued after the LTTE's military defeat in 2009 and employed charities as fronts to collect and divert funds for its activities. 6 11. Malaysian police counter-terrorism chief Ayob Khan Mydin Pitchay said in his statement, “there are attempts from certain quarters from outside Sri Lanka, not just in Malaysia, to reactivate the LTTE movement, after arresting two politicians suspected of links to the Sri Lankan terrorist group.” 7 12.
Recommended publications
  • Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia List of Commanders of the LTTE
    4/29/2016 List of commanders of the LTTE ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia List of commanders of the LTTE From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The following is a list of commanders of theLiberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), also known as the Tamil Tigers, a separatist militant Tamil nationalist organisation, which operated in northern and eastern Sri Lanka from late 1970s to May 2009, until it was defeated by the Sri Lankan Military.[1][2] Date & Place Date & Place Nom de Guerre Real Name Position(s) Notes of Birth of Death Thambi (used only by Velupillai 26 November 1954 19 May Leader of the LTTE Prabhakaran was the supreme closest associates) and Prabhakaran † Velvettithurai 2009(aged 54)[3][4][5] leader of LTTE, which waged a Anna (elder brother) Vellamullivaikkal 25­year violent secessionist campaign in Sri Lanka. His death in Nanthikadal lagoon,Vellamullivaikkal,Mullaitivu, brought an immediate end to the Sri Lankan Civil War. Pottu Amman alias Shanmugalingam 1962 18 May 2009 Leader of Tiger Pottu Amman was the second­in­ Papa Oscar alias Sivashankar † Nayanmarkaddu[6] (aged 47) Organization Security command of LTTE. His death was Sobhigemoorthyalias Kailan Vellamullivaikkal Intelligence Service initially disputed because the dead (TOSIS) and Black body was not found. But in Tigers October 2010,TADA court judge K. Dakshinamurthy dropped charges against Amman, on the Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, accepting the CBI's report on his demise.[7][8] Selvarasa Shanmugam 6 April 1955 Leader of LTTE since As the chief arms procurer since Pathmanathan (POW) Kumaran Kankesanthurai the death of the origin of the organisation, alias Kumaran Tharmalingam Prabhakaran.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAP 9 Sri Lanka
    79o 00' 79o 30' 80o 00' 80o 30' 81o 00' 81o 30' 82o 00' Kankesanturai Point Pedro A I Karaitivu I. Jana D Peninsula N Kayts Jana SRI LANKA I Palk Strait National capital Ja na Elephant Pass Punkudutivu I. Lag Provincial capital oon Devipattinam Delft I. Town, village Palk Bay Kilinochchi Provincial boundary - Puthukkudiyiruppu Nanthi Kadal Main road Rameswaram Iranaitivu Is. Mullaittivu Secondary road Pamban I. Ferry Vellankulam Dhanushkodi Talaimannar Manjulam Nayaru Lagoon Railroad A da m' Airport s Bridge NORTHERN Nedunkeni 9o 00' Kokkilai Lagoon Mannar I. Mannar Puliyankulam Pulmoddai Madhu Road Bay of Bengal Gulf of Mannar Silavatturai Vavuniya Nilaveli Pankulam Kebitigollewa Trincomalee Horuwupotana r Bay Medawachchiya diya A d o o o 8 30' ru 8 30' v K i A Karaitivu I. ru Hamillewa n a Mutur Y Pomparippu Anuradhapura Kantalai n o NORTH CENTRAL Kalpitiya o g Maragahewa a Kathiraveli L Kal m a Oy a a l a t t Puttalam Kekirawa Habarane u 8o 00' P Galgamuwa 8o 00' NORTH Polonnaruwa Dambula Valachchenai Anamaduwa a y O Mundal Maho a Chenkaladi Lake r u WESTERN d Batticaloa Naula a M uru ed D Ganewatta a EASTERN g n Madura Oya a G Reservoir Chilaw i l Maha Oya o Kurunegala e o 7 30' w 7 30' Matale a Paddiruppu h Kuliyapitiya a CENTRAL M Kehelula Kalmunai Pannala Kandy Mahiyangana Uhana Randenigale ya Amparai a O a Mah Reservoir y Negombo Kegalla O Gal Tirrukkovil Negombo Victoria Falls Reservoir Bibile Senanayake Lagoon Gampaha Samudra Ja-Ela o a Nuwara Badulla o 7 00' ng 7 00' Kelan a Avissawella Eliya Colombo i G Sri Jayewardenepura
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka Eligibility
    UNHCR ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION NEEDS OF ASYLUM-SEEKERS FROM SRI LANKA United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) April 2009 NOTE UNHCR Eligibility Guidelines are issued by the Office to assist decision-makers, including UNHCR staff, Governments and private practitioners, in assessing the international protection needs of asylum-seekers from a given country. They are authoritative legal interpretations of the refugee criteria in respect of specific groups on the basis of objectively assessed social, political, economic, security, human rights, and humanitarian conditions in the country of origin concerned. The pertinent protection needs are analyzed in detail and recommendations made as to how the applications in question should be decided upon in line with the relevant principles and criteria of refugee law as per, notably, the 1951 Convention and its 1967 Protocol, the UNHCR Statute and relevant regional instruments such as the Cartagena Declaration, the 1969 OAU Convention and the EU Asylum Directives. The recommendations may also touch upon, as relevant, complementary or subsidiary protection regimes. UNHCR issues its Eligibility Guidelines pursuant to its responsibility to promote the accurate interpretation and application of the above-mentioned refugee criteria as envisaged by Article 8 of its Statute, Article 35 of the 1951 Convention and Article II of its 1967 Protocol and based on the expertise it has developed over several years in eligibility and refugee status determination matters. It is expected that the positions and guidance contained in the Guidelines should be weighed heavily by the relevant decision-making authorities in reaching a decision on the asylum applications concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 28.Pdf
    CBRNE Terrorism Newsletter 2 «Η διεθνής τρομοκρατία θα τελειώσει μόνον όταν αποκτήσουμε το θάρρος να καθίσουμε και να μιλήσουμε με τον μουσουλμανικό κόσμο, αντί να προκαλούμε νέες κρίσεις ή να αρχίζουμε νέους πολέμους» Sir Βασίλειος Μαρκεζίνης* Καθηγητής Δικαίου (UK) * Ο Sir Βασίλειος Μαρκεζίνης διετέλεσε Καθηγητής στο Κέημπριτζ, την Οξφόρδη και το Λονδίνο, κατείχε δε, επίσης έδρα στο Λάηντεν (Ολλανδία) και στο Ώστιν του Τέξας (ΗΠΑ). Επιπλέον, έχει διδάξει σε είκοσι πέντε Πανεπιστήμια ανά τον κόσμο, έχει συγγράψει τριάντα τρία βιβλία και πάνω από εκατόν τριάντα νομικά άρθρα, τα οποία έχουν δημοσιευθεί σε νομικά περιοδικά σε ολόκληρο τον κόσμο. Τα έργα του έχουν μεταφρασθεί στα γερμανικά, γαλλικά, ιταλικά, πορτογαλικά και κινεζικά. Είναι Μέλος της Βρετανικής Ακαδημίας, Αντεπιστέλλον Μέλος της Γαλλικής Ακαδημίας και της Ακαδημίας Αθηνών, Ξένος Εταίρος της Βελγικής, της Ολλανδικής και της Ιταλικής (Academia dei Lincei) Ακαδημίας, όπως επίσης και του Αμερικανικού Ινστιτούτου Δικαίου. Από το 1997 φέρει τον τίτλο του Επίτιμου Συμβούλου της Βασίλισσας της Αγγλίας (Queen's Counsel), ενώ από το 2000 είναι Ειδικός Επιστημονικός Σύμβουλος του Πρώτου Προέδρου του Γαλλικού Ακυρωτικού (Cour de Cassation). Το 2005 έλαβε τον τίτλο του Ιππότη από τη Βασίλισσα Ελισάβετ ΙΙ για τις εξαίρετες υπηρεσίες που έχει προσφέρει στις διεθνείς νομικές σχέσεις. Επιπλέον, έχει λάβει εξαιρετικά υψηλές τιμές από τους Προέδρους Μιτεράν και Σιράκ (της Γαλλίας), Σκάλφαρο και Τσιάμπι (της Ιταλίας) και φον Βάιτσκερ και Χέρτσοκ (της Γερμανίας). Τέλος, από το 2007 είναι Μέλος του Διοικητικού Συμβουλίου του Κοινωφελούς Ιδρύματος «Αλέξανδρος Σ. Ωνάσης». Μ ΒΡΕΤΑΝΙΑ Εκλογή πρώτου μουσουλμάνου υπουργού Ο μουσουλμάνος Shahid Malik εξελέγη πρόσφατα Υπουργός Δικαιοσύνης στη Μ Βρετανία – προφανώς στα πλαίσια της ειρηνικής συνεχιζόμενης μουσουλμανοποίη- σης της Ευρώπης την οποία ακόμη οι περισσότεροι από εμάς δεν έχουμε συνειδητοποιήσει.
    [Show full text]
  • Endgame in Sri Lanka Ajit Kumar Singh*
    Endgame in Sri Lanka Ajit Kumar Singh* If we do not end war – war will end us. Everybody says that, millions of people believe it, and nobody does anything. – H.G. Wells 1 The Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapakse finally ended the Eelam War2 in May 2009 – though, perhaps, not in the manner many would desire. So determined was the President that he had told Roland Buerk of the BBC in an interview published on February 21, 2007, “I don't want to pass this problem on to the next generation.”3 Though the final phase of open war4 began on January 16, 2008, following the January 2 unilateral withdrawal of the Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) from the Norway-brokered * Ajit Kumar Singh, Research Fellow, Institute for Conflict Management 1 Things to Come (The film story), Part III, adapted from his 1933 novel The Shape of Things to Come, spoken by the character John Cabal. 2 The civil war in Sri Lanka can be divided into four phases: Eelam War I between 1983 and 1987, Eelam War II between 1990-1994, Eelam War III between 1995-2001, and Eelam War IV between 2006-2009. See Muttukrishna Sarvananthaa in “Economy of the Conflict Region in Sri Lanka: From Embargo to Repression”, Policy Studies 44, East-West Centre, http://www.eastwestcenter.org/fileadmin/stored/pdfs/ps044.pdf. 3 “No end in sight to Sri Lanka conflict”, February 21, 2007, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6382787.stm. 4 Amantha Perera, “Sri Lanka: Open War”, South Asia Intelligence Review, Volume 6, No.28, http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/sair/Archives/6_28.htm#assessment1.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL)* **
    A/HRC/30/CRP.2 Advance Version Distr.: Restricted 16 September 2015 English only Human Rights Council Thirtieth session Agenda item 2 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Report of the OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL)* ** * Reproduced as received ** The information contained in this document should be read in conjunction with the report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights- Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka (A/HRC/30/61). A/HRC/30/CRP.2 Contents Paragraphs Page Part 1 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1–13 5 II. Establishment of the OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL), mandate and methodology ............................................................................................................. 14–46 7 III. Contextual background ........................................................................................... 47–103 12 IV. Overview of Government, LTTE and other armed groups...................................... 104–170 22 V. Legal framework ..................................................................................................... 171–208 36 Part 2– Thematic Chapters VI. Unlawful killings ..................................................................................................... 209–325 47 VII. Violations related to the
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Justice for Women Ex-Combatants in Sri Lanka
    Transitional Justice for Women Ex-Combatants in Sri Lanka Nirekha De Silva Transitional Justice for Women Ex-Combatants in Sri Lanka Copyright© WISCOMP Foundation for Universal Responsibility Of His Holiness The Dalai Lama, New Delhi, India, 2006. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by WISCOMP Foundation for Universal Responsibility Of His Holiness The Dalai Lama Core 4A, UGF, India Habitat Centre Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003, India This initiative was made possible by a grant from the Ford Foundation. The views expressed are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect those of WISCOMP or the Foundation for Universal Responsibility of HH The Dalai Lama, nor are they endorsed by them. 2 Contents Acknowledgements 5 Preface 7 Introduction 9 Methodology 11 List of Abbreviations 13 Civil War in Sri Lanka 14 Army Women 20 LTTE Women 34 Peace and the process of Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration 45 Human Needs and Human Rights in Reintegration 55 Psychological Barriers in Reintegration 68 Social Adjustment to Civil Life 81 Available Mechanisms 87 Recommendations 96 Directory of Available Resources 100 • Counselling Centres 100 • Foreign Recruitment 102 • Local Recruitment 132 • Vocational Training 133 • Financial Resources 160 • Non-Government Organizations (NGO’s) 163 Bibliography 199 List of People Interviewed 204 3 4 Acknowledgements I am grateful to Dr. Meenakshi Gopinath and Sumona DasGupta of Women in Security, Conflict Management and Peace (WISCOMP), India, for offering the Scholar for Peace Fellowship in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on Sri Lanka
    A/HRC/34/20 Advance edited version Distr.: General 10 February 2017 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-fourth session 27 February-24 March 2017 Agenda item 2 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on Sri Lanka Summary The present report assesses the progress made in the implementation of Human Rights Council resolution 30/1, on promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka between October 2015 and January 2017. On that basis, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights identifies efforts that need to be taken to achieve progress in the reconciliation and accountability agenda to which the Government of Sri Lanka has committed. The High Commissioner also advocates for the Government to continue meaningful consultations with relevant stakeholders on transitional justice and the reform agenda, and urges the Council to sustain its close engagement and monitoring of developments in Sri Lanka. A/HRC/34/20 Contents Page I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Engagement of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and United Nations human rights mechanisms .................................................................. 3 III. Developments in reconciliation and accountability
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka Country Information Report No. 3
    SRI LANKA COUNTRY INFORMATION REPORT NO. 3 15 June 2021 Combined Refugee Action Group, Geelong, Victoria For further information, contact: [email protected] The Combined Refugee Action Group is a network group that brings together people from a variety of backgrounds across the Geelong region in Victoria, (Refugee Support Groups, Church and Community Groups, Unions, Political Groups, Social Justice and Social Action Groups, students, and individuals). We are united by the shared aim of advocating for just, humane, and welcoming policies towards refugees and people seeking asylum. Table of Contents Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 Legislative changes for greater control ...................................................................... 4 Rajapaksa family ................................................................................................................. 5 Attacks on journalists and human rights organisations ....................................... 6 Forced disappearances .................................................................................................... 9 The situation for Tamils ................................................................................................ 12 Election violence .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (DFAT) Country Information Report on Sri Lanka of 4 November 2019
    July 2020 Comments on the Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s (DFAT) Country Information Report on Sri Lanka of 4 November 2019 Contents About ARC ................................................................................................................................... 2 Introductory remarks on ARC’s COI methodology ......................................................................... 3 General methodological observations on the DFAT Country report on Sri Lanka ............................ 5 Section-specific observations on the DFAT Country report on Sri Lanka ....................................... 13 Economic Overview, Economic conditions in the north and east ........................................................ 13 Security situation, Security situation in the north and east ................................................................. 14 Race/Nationality; Tamils ....................................................................................................................... 16 Tamils .................................................................................................................................................... 20 Tamils: Monitoring, harassment, arrest and detention ........................................................................ 23 Political Opinion (Actual or Imputed): Political representation of minorities, including ethnic and religious minorities ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PRG Statement – Karuna Amman 29-06-2020
    Address: Kemp House, 152-160 City Road, London, United Kingdom EC1V 2NX Email: [email protected] | Web: prgsrilanka.org Tel: +44(0)20 8191 9612 29th June 2020 People’s Rights Group (PRG) Calls on the Government of Sri Lanka to Investigate and Prosecute Mr.Vinayagamoorthy Muralitharan a.k.a Karuna Amman for war crimes and other Human Rights Abuses People’s Rights Group (PRG), a rights based advocacy and lobbying group, focusing on human rights violations in Sri Lanka, calls on the Government of Sri Lanka(GoSL) to seriously launch a formal impartial investigation into many charges of war crimes and human rights abuses allegedly committed by a former LTTE regional leader turned politician Mr. Vinyagamoorthy Muralitharan, better known as Karuna Amman. An investigation into many war crimes charges against him was long overdue. Allegations of his brutal crimes were never investigated when he defected from the LTTE in 2004 and collaborated with the Sri Lankan armed forces and helped in defeating the LTTEthe Tigers. Mr. Karuna was arrested in the United Kingdom on travelling with a false passport but was released after four months in custody reportedly due to insufficient evidence to convict him for any criminal offenses in the UK. Thus, he has never been held accountable for his alleged terror acts and crimes against humanity. PRG is however of the considered view that his alleged crimes are not only punishable under the Penal Code of Sri Lanka but also war crimes and crimes against humanity. Although renewed public outcries recently highlighted the need for holding him to account, only when he admitted killing 2,000-3,000 soldiers in one night at Elephant Pass during the bloody civil war in 1990s, and boasting that he was more dangerous than the Coronavirus, his terror and criminal records however stretched far beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments
    Hans Born and Albrecht Schnabel (Eds) Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) LIT Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments edited by Hans Born and Albrecht Schnabel LIT (Bibliographic information here) Contents Preface vii Acknowledgements ix Abbreviations xi Part I: Introduction 1 Ideal Requirements versus Real Environments in Security 3 Sector Reform Albrecht Schnabel Part II: Learning from Challenging SSR Environments 2 Security Sector Reform in the Central African Republic 39 Boubacar N’Diaye 3 Limited Security Sector Reform in Colombia 69 Wolf Grabendorff 4 Security Sector Reform in the DRC: Forward to the Past 89 Caty Clément 5 Impatient Reformers and Reignited Conflicts: The Case 119 of Georgia Duncan Hiscock 6 Morocco: Reforms in the Security Sector But No ‘SSR’ 143 Hanspeter Mattes 7 Security Sector Reform in Nepal: Challenges and 165 Opportunities Bishnu Raj Upreti and Peter Vanhoutte 8 Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Security Sector Reform 189 in Sri Lanka Eleanor Pavey and Chris Smith 9 A Lot of Talk But Not a Lot of Action: The Difficulty of 213 Implementing SSR in Timor-Leste Gordon Peake Part III: Conclusion 10 Security Sector Reform in Challenging Environments: 241 Insights from Comparative Analysis Hans Born List of Contributors 267 About DCAF 269 Preface The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in promoting good governance and reform of the security sector. Beyond a range of publications linked to its activities, each year DCAF dedicates one book to a topic that is of particular relevance to its research and operational activities.
    [Show full text]