Environmental Contaminants in Food

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Contaminants in Food Environmental Contaminants in Food December 1979 NTIS order #PB80-153265 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 79-600207 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock No. 052-003-00724-0 FOREWORD This report presents the major findings of an OTA assessment of Federal and State efforts to deal with the environmental contamination of food. Undertaken at the request of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, the study examines both regulatory approaches and monitoring strategies for coping with contaminated food. The assessment is concerned with chemical and radioactive contaminants that inadvertently find their way into the human food supply. To bring the scope of inquiry within manageable bounds, we excluded naturally occurring toxins such as fungal and microbial toxins. The Office of Technology Assessment was assisted by two advisory panels of scientists and representatives of public interest groups, agriculture, the chemical industry, fisheries, and State and foreign governments. The Food and Drug Ad- ministration, the Department of Agriculture, and the Environmental Protection Agency each designated staff members to attend panel meetings, provide back- ground information, and review draft reports, Background papers were commis- sioned concerning the scientific aspects of detecting and regulating environ- mental contaminants in food. The Congressional Research Service provided five analyses of previous food contamination episodes, Reviews of the draft report were provided by the advisory panels, Federal agencies, and a number of inter- ested individuals not previously involved with the assessment. Because this assessment addresses concerns of American citizens as well as policy makers and scientists, the summary of the report is also being published as a separate document. The summary provides the interested citizen with an in- formative and clear overview of this complex problem. Copies of the summary can he obtained free of charge from the office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Con- gress, Washington, D.C. 20510. JOHN H. GIBBONS Director /// .- Tolerance Advisory Panel James Anderson Robert Jackson Richard Merrill Manager for Material Safety Assistant State Health Commissioner School of Law Allied Chemical Corporation Director, Office of Health Protection and University of Virginia Environmental Management Louise Burke Virginia State Health Department Joseph Rosen Executive Director Kazuo K, Kimura Department of Food Science Consumer Council of Virginia Foundation School of Medicine Rutgers University Consumer Council of Virginia, Inc. Wright State University Kenneth Crump Marvin Legator John Rust Department of Mathematics and Statistics Director Professor Emeritus Louisiana Tech University Division of Environmental Toxicology Pharmacology/Radiology Deportment of Preventive Medicine and University of Chicago Donald Epp Community Health Department of Agricultural Economics and University of Texas Medical Branch Gary Van Gelder Rural Sociology David Lindsay College of Veterinary Medicine Pennsylvania Stale [University Technical Secretary University of Missouri Steering Group on Food Surveillance Frederick Halbert Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Dairy Farmer John Van Ryzin Food Delton, Mich. RAND Corporation United Kingdom Joseph Highland Roy Mart in George Whitehead Chairman Director Deputy Director Toxic Chemicals Program Science and Technology Office for Consumer Affairs Environmental Defense Fund National Fisheries Institute, Inc. Michigan Department of Agriculture Monitoring Advisory Panel Raymond Allred William Cooper S. Roy Koirtyohann Director Professor Environmental Trace Substances Center Environmental Conservation Research Department of Zoology University of Missouri Continental Oil Company College of Natural Science Michigan State University Charles Krister Richard Anderson Retired Manager Chairman John Davies Chairman Biochemicals Department Statistics Department E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company University of Kentucky Department of Epidemiology and Public Health John Bourke School of Medicine John Laseter Director Universitv of Miami Director Analytical Division Blake Early Center for Bio-Organic Studies Food Science Department Environmental Action, Inc. University of New or leans Cornell University Edward Elkins Vaughan Bowen Director John Martin Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Chemistry Division Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Washington Research Laboratory Shirley Briggs National Food Processors’ Association Rebecca Sharitz Executive Director Ronald J. Hingle Savannah River Ecology Laboratories Rachel Carson Trust for the Living University of Georgia Environment, Inc. Administrator Food and Drug Control Unit Leon Chesnin Bureau of Environmental Services Gerald Ward Department of Agronomy Louisiana Office of Health Services and Department of Animal Science University of Nebraska Environmental Quality Colorado State University Iv Food and Renewable Resources Program Staff Joyce C. Lashof, Assistant Director Health and Life Sciences Division J. B. Cordaro, Program Manager* Walter Parham, Program Manager Catherine Woteki, Project Director Robert Smith, Research Assistant Chris Elf ring, OTA Congressional Fellow Administrative Staff Phyllis Balan Elizabeth Galloway Ogechee Koffler Contractors Lloyd W. Hazleton, Technical Advisor to Tolerance Panel Robert Huggett, Technical Advisor to Monitoring Panel Samuel Iker, Editor OTA Publishing Staff John C. Holmes, Publishing Officer Kathie S. Boss Joanne Heming Food Advisory Committee Martin E. Abel, Chairmen Lorne Greene Robert 0. Nesheim Senior Vice President Chairman of the Board Vice President, Science and Schnittker Associates American Freedom From Technology Hunger Foundation The Quaker oats Company Johanna Dwyer, Co-Chairman Kathleen O’Reilly Director Richard L. Hall Frances Stern Nutrition Center Director Vice President, Science and Consumer Federation of America Technology David Call McCormick & Company, Inc. R. Dennis Rouse Dean, College of Agricultural Dean, School of Agriculture and Life Sciences Auburn University Cornell University Laura Heuser Member, Board of Directors Lauren Seth Cy Carpenter Agricultural Council of America Agricultural Consultant President Minnesota Farmers Union Arnold Mayer Thomas Sporleder Legislative Representative Professor of Agricultural Eliot Coleman Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Economics Director Butcher Workmen of North Texas A&M University Coolidge Center for the America Sylvan Wittwer Study of Agriculture Director and Assistant Dean Almeta Edwards Fleming Max Milner College of Agriculture and Social Program Coordinator Executive Director Natural Resources Florence County, S.C. American Institute of Nutrition Michigan State University *Resigned June 16, 1979, and continued to serve under contract to assessment completion. Contents Chapter Page I. Summary . `“ “ “ “ ● ● ● “ ● 00 G o “ ● “ o ● ● o ● o ● “ o ● 00 “ ● “ o “ “ “ 3 Health Impacts of Environmental Contamination. 4 Economic Impacts of Contamination. ““ .“ . ““. ““. “ .“ 4 Major Problems in Identifying Environmental Contaminants . 5 Problems of Regulating Environmental Contaminants. 5 Findings and Conclusions . “ “ “ “ . “ “ “ . m “ “ “ o “ o “ . “ . “ “ “ “ 6 Congressional Options. ..” . “ “ “ “ .0. “ o ‘. “ c o “ o “ “ o “ “ “ ““ 9 Option l.--Maintain the Present System . ..........”””’ . .. .”.”””. 9 Option2.—Amend the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act . 9 Option 3 .—Establish an Investigatory Monitoring System. 10 Option 4.— Improve Federal Response to New Contamination Incidents . 10 15 II. Environmental Contamination of Food.”~””.”. .“””.’””ooooQo ● +00 ”00”0 How Food Becomes Contaminated . .........””””” ....”””..”.... .“”” 16 Magnitude of the problem . .“.”””””.”..”. “...” 19 Evidence of Human Illness Resulting From Consumption of Contaminated Food. ...””””””.””.” “o” ”””.. 19 Polychlorinated Biphenyls. “ ~ . “ “ m “ “ ~ 0. ~ 0. “ “ o ~ . 19 Polybrominated Biphenyls . ..........”””” ..”””.””” .“.”.”.”””.” 20 Mercury and Methylmercury . “ . “ “ ~ ~ .“ “ “ ~ “ . “ “ 0. 21 Radioactivity . “ “ “O 00 “ ““ ~ s o “ ~ 000 s Q “ o “ “ s “ o “ 22 Number of Food Contamination Incidents. “ . ““” ~ “ “ “.” 23 Economic Impact . ..””””.”” “0”””00.0””””. ““s””” 25 Costs of Food Condemned. ..”.”. “. ““””.””””.”” 25 Health Costs... .....,..””””.” 0“0.o’0”””””00 ““”””””.. 26 Distributional Effects and Costs . “ ““ “ . “ . “ “ “ “ “ .0 “ ““ 27 Potential Food Contamination problems. .“ .“ “ . “. ‘“” ““ “ “ 29 Conclusions and Issues . “ . “ “ ~ “ . ~ ~ . ~ “ ~ . “ “ “ “ o “ “ o ~ o “ s “ “ 29 Chapter II References . “ “ “ ~ “ . “ 0.0. s o “ 0000. s “ “ . 30 35 111. Federal Laws, Regulations, and Programs” . “ “ “ “ “ 00 ● o “ o “ ● 0000 Federal Laws. “ “ .“” “ “ ““ “O . “ “ “ 000 “ “.” ~ o ‘ . “ 00 “ .- e o 35 Action Levels and Tolerances. “ ‘ “ “ “ “ “ ~ “ “ ~ “ “ “ ~ o “ o “ “ o “ “ ~ 37 Criteria forgetting Action Levels and Tolerances . 38 Determining Action Levels and Tolerances . “ . “ . “ “ “ “ . 39 Evaluation of the Scientific Data. .“” . ““ “ ““ ~ ““” “ “ “ 39 Evaluation of Decisionmaking Approach . ““ . .“ “.” . “ “ 41 Federal Monitoring programs. “ . “ “ . “ “ 000 “ “ s m “ . “ “ “ “ ~ 42 Food and Drug Administration . “ “ . “ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ .0 “ o ‘ “ “ “ . 42 U.S. Department of Agriculture . “ . “ “ ‘ “ “ “ “ “ “ “ o “ “ 0.00 43 Environmental Protection Agency . .......”..”.”.o ““” ”s”s.”s 44 Critique of Federal Monitoring programs. “ . “ . “ 45 Chapter III References . ““” ““”” ~
Recommended publications
  • Wrong Perception and Scanty Knowledge on Food Handling: a Recipe for Food Contamination and Poisoning.”
    International Journal For Research In Health Sciences And Nursing ISSN: 2208-2670 “WRONG PERCEPTION AND SCANTY KNOWLEDGE ON FOOD HANDLING: A RECIPE FOR FOOD CONTAMINATION AND POISONING.” (1) SAMUEL AUGUSTINE TURAY BEIJING ADVANCED INNIVATION CENTER FOR FOOD NUTRITION AND HUMAN HEALTH (BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY), BEIJING 100048, CHINA [email protected] (2) SHAN LIANG SCHOOL OF FOOD CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, (BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY), BEIJING 100048, CHINA (3) MIN ZHANG ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER FOR FOOD AADDICTIVES (BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY), BEIJING 100048, CHINA (4) ADIKALI KABA SESAY BEIJING SPORT UNIVERSITY-CHINA [email protected] Abstract Food processing is of vital importance in maintaining proper health as well as avoiding food poisoning and food contamination. The study is focused on bringing to light the concept of food safety and food handling. It is believed by the researcher that Sierra Leoneans do have a little knowledge on handling food and this has resulted to series of infections. Keeping food is scientific and the illiteracy rate is high giving rise for more people not to be able to follow precautionary measures in handling food. The research also focused on bringing out the different methods of food contaminations. These vary from biological, chemical and physical means. The biological components covers bacterial, virus and parasites, while the chemicals level looks into Volume-3 | Issue-12 | December,2017 | Paper-3 29 International Journal For Research In Health Sciences And Nursing ISSN: 2208-2670 various toxin, natural and marine toxins were also covered. The methodology was mostly empirical as literatures were reviewed from other research done by other writers.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on Food Fortification with Micronutrients
    GUIDELINES ON FOOD FORTIFICATION FORTIFICATION FOOD ON GUIDELINES Interest in micronutrient malnutrition has increased greatly over the last few MICRONUTRIENTS WITH years. One of the main reasons is the realization that micronutrient malnutrition contributes substantially to the global burden of disease. Furthermore, although micronutrient malnutrition is more frequent and severe in the developing world and among disadvantaged populations, it also represents a public health problem in some industrialized countries. Measures to correct micronutrient deficiencies aim at ensuring consumption of a balanced diet that is adequate in every nutrient. Unfortunately, this is far from being achieved everywhere since it requires universal access to adequate food and appropriate dietary habits. Food fortification has the dual advantage of being able to deliver nutrients to large segments of the population without requiring radical changes in food consumption patterns. Drawing on several recent high quality publications and programme experience on the subject, information on food fortification has been critically analysed and then translated into scientifically sound guidelines for application in the field. The main purpose of these guidelines is to assist countries in the design and implementation of appropriate food fortification programmes. They are intended to be a resource for governments and agencies that are currently implementing or considering food fortification, and a source of information for scientists, technologists and the food industry. The guidelines are written from a nutrition and public health perspective, to provide practical guidance on how food fortification should be implemented, monitored and evaluated. They are primarily intended for nutrition-related public health programme managers, but should also be useful to all those working to control micronutrient malnutrition, including the food industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Food and Food Processing
    2010 INTRODUCTION TO ANDFOOD FOOD PROCESSING – I TRAINING MANUAL FOR FOOD SAFETY REGULATORS Vol THE TRAINING MANUAL FOR FOOD SAFETY REGULATORS WHO ARE INVOLVED IN IMPLEMENTING FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT 2006 ACROSS THE COUNTRY FOODS SAFETY & STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE) FDA BHAVAN, KOTLA ROAD, NEW DELHI – 110 002 Website: www.fssai.gov.in INDEX TRAINING MANUAL FOR FOOD SAFETY OFFICERS Sr Subject Topics Page No No 1 INTRODUCTION TO INTRODUCTION TO FOOD FOOD – ITS Carbohydrates, Protein, fat, Fibre, Vitamins, Minerals, ME etc. NUTRITIONAL, Effect of food processing on food nutrition. Basics of Food safety TECHNOLOGICAL Food Contaminants (Microbial, Chemical, Physical) AND SAFETY ASPECTS Food Adulteration (Common adulterants, simple tests for detection of adulteration) Food Additives (Classification, functional role, safety issues) Food Packaging & labelling (Packaging types, understanding labelling rules & 2 to 100 Regulations, Nutritional labelling, labelling requirements for pre-packaged food as per CODEX) INTRODUCTION OF FOOD PROCESSING AND TECHNOLOGY F&VP, Milk, Meat, Oil, grain milling, tea-Coffee, Spices & condiments processing. Food processing techniques (Minimal processing Technologies, Photochemical processes, Pulsed electric field, Hurdle Technology) Food Preservation Techniques (Pickling, drying, smoking, curing, caning, bottling, Jellying, modified atmosphere, pasteurization etc.) 2 FOOD SAFETY – A Codex Alimentarius Commission (CODEX) GLOBAL Introduction Standards, codes
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation Between Total DDT Residues in Blood and Fat of Beef Animals 1
    948 Journal ofFood Protection Vol. 42, No. 12, Pages 948-949 (December, 1979) Copyright © 1979, International Association of Milk, Food, and Environmental Sanitarians Correlation Between Total DDT Residues in Blood and Fat of Beef Animals 1 M. DE CAMPOS2•, C. E. GUTIERREZ B. and A. E. OLSZYNA-MARZYS3 Institute ofNutrition ofCentral America and Panama (JNCAP), Apartado Posta! I I 88, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Central America (Received for publication February 26. 1979) ABSTRACT MATERIALS Al'.lJ METHODS Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/42/12/948/1649976/0362-028x-42_12_948.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 In Guatemala, where in certain regions heavily pesticide-sprayed Samples cotton fields are interspersed with pastures for cattle, pesticide residues Samples of blood and fat were collected from 30 bovines of different in beef fat represent a problem. Organochlorine pesticides are still sex and breed in the Department of Escuintla on the Pacific Coast. widely used and even if the use of DDT has been decreasing over the Twenty ml of blood were taken by puncture of the jugular vein and last few years, this pesticide is still a major food contaminant. The collected in glass tubes containing 4 drops of heparin as an present study was undertaken to establish if a correlation between total anticoagulant. The tubes, as well as all the glassware used for analysis, DDT levels in blood and fat could be found. Samples of blood and fat were previously washed with soap and water, rinsed with tap water and from 30 bovines were analyzed by gas-liquid chromatography.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microbial Quality of Fast Food and Traditional Fast Food
    Nature and Science 2010;8(10) The Microbial Quality of Fast Food and Traditional Fast Food Saadia M. Hassanein Easa Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt Abstract: Sixty food samples were collected from 60 random restaurants of fast and traditional fast foods in El Qassium, Saudi Arabia and investigated for bacteria species using different temperatures (10oC, 20oC, 30oC, 40oC and 50oC) incubated for 24-48 hours and analyzed for fungi and yeasts incubated at 25oC. The results revealed that from 45 sample of traditional foods, yielded a total twenty two species of eighteen genera of bacteria. A fourteen species of twelve genera of fungi and three species of three genera of yeasts. While fast food results revealed that from 15 fast food samples collected from 15 restaurants a total ten species of ten genera of bacteria. A total eight species of seven genera of fungi. The species of bacteria isolated in this study namely, Acetobacter sp., Achromobacter sp., Bacillus coagulans, B. Subtilis, Clostridium perfringens, Erwinia carotovora, Escherichia coli, Flavobacterium sp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Lactobacillus plantarum, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Listeria monocytogenes, Microbacterium lacticum, Micrococcus sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putrefaciens, Salmonella sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus lactis, Streptococcus thermophilus, Campylobacter jejuni, Citrobacter fruendii, Proteus vulgaris and Yersinia sp. The occurrence of some these bacteria illustrate that fast foods in these restaurants may act as a reservoir of pathogenic bacteria for human. Fungi isolated namely Aspergillus glaucus, A. niger, Alternaria sp., Cheotomium candidum, Cladosporium herbarum, Fusarium sp., Monilia sp., Mucor rouxii, Neuropora sp., Penicillium expansum, Penicillium sp., Rhizopus nigricans, Sporotrichum carinis and Thamnidium elegans.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles for the Safety Assessment of Food Additives and Contaminants in Food
    J U L 1987 Environmental Health Criteria 70 -S St : Principles for the Safety Assessment of Food Additives and Contaminants in Food Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour j Organisation, and the World Health Organization in collaboration with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GENEVA 1987 Other titles available in the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA series include: Mercury Aquatic (Marine and Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Freshwater) Biotoxins Terphenyls Heptachlor Lead Paraquat and Diquat Oxides of Nitrogen Endosulfan Nitrates, Nitrites, and Quintozene N-Nitroso Compounds Tecnazene Principles and Methods for Chlordecone Evaluating the Toxicity of Mirex Chemicals, Part 1 Camphechlor Photochemical Oxidants Guidelines for the Study of Sulfur Oxides and Suspended Genetic Effects in Human Particulate Matter Populations DDT and its Derivatives Summary Report on the Carbon Disulfide Evaluation of Short-Term Tests Mycotoxins for Carcinogens (Collaborative Noise Study on In Vitro Tests) Carbon Monoxide Dimethyl Sulfate Ultraviolet Radiation Acrylamide Tin and Organotin Compounds Trichloroethylene Radiofrequency and Microwaves Guide to Short-Term Tests for Manganese Detecting Mutagenic and Arsenic Carcinogenic Chemicals Hydrogen Sulfide Toluene Selected Petroleum Products Asbestos and Other Natural Chlorine and Hydrogen Mineral Fibres Chloride Ammonia 22 Ultrasound Ethylene Oxide Lasers and Optical Radiation Propylene Oxide Titanium
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Different Sanitizers on Food Contaminant Bacteria
    ISSN 0101-2061 Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos Original Influence of different sanitizers on food contaminant bacteria: effect of exposure temperature, contact time, and product concentration Influência de diferentes sanitizantes na contaminação de alimentos por bactérias: Efeito da temperatura de exposição, tempo de contato e concentração de produto Cezar Augusto BELTRAME1, Gabriela Busnello KUBIAK1, Lindomar Alberto LERIN2, Ieda ROTTAVA2, Altemir José MOSSI1, Débora de OLIVEIRA1, Rogério Luis CANSIAN1, Helen TREICHEL1, Geciane TONIAZZO1* Abstract The efficiency of four Sanitizers - peracetic acid, chlorhexidine, quaternary ammonium, and organic acids - was tested in this work using different bacteria recognized as a problem to meat industry, Salmonella sp., S. aureus, E. coli and L. monocytogenes. The effects of sanitizer concentration (0.2, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0, 1.1 and 1.4%), at different temperatures (10 and 45 °C) and contact time (2, 10, 15, 18 and 25 minutes) were evaluated. Tests in an industrial plant were also carried out considering previously obtained results. In a general way, peracetic acid presented higher efficiencies using low concentration (0.2%) and contact time (2 minutes) at 10 °C. The tests performed in industrial scale showed that peracetic acid presented a good performance in concentration and contact time lower than that suggested by the suppliers. The use of chlorhexidine and quaternary ammonium led to reasonable results at the indicated conditions, and organic acids were ineffective under concentration and contact time higher than those indicated by the suppliers in relation to Staphylococcus aureus. The results, in general, show that the choice for the most adequate sanitizer depends on the microorganism contaminant, the time available for sanitizer application, and also on the process cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Assuring Food Safety and Quality
    FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ASSURING FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY: GUIDELINES FOR STRENGTHENING NATIONAL FOOD CONTROL SYSTEMS Joint FAO/WHO Publication TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PREAMBLE 1 2. INTRODUCTION 2 3. IMPORTANT FOOD ISSUES 3 3.1 Food Safety, Quality and Consumer Protection 3 3.2 Global Considerations 4 (a) International Trade 4 (b) Codex Alimentarius Commission 4 (c) SPS and TBT Agreements 4 4. ELEMENTS OF A NATIONAL FOOD CONTROL SYSTEM 6 4.1 Objectives 6 4.2 Scope 6 4.3 Building Blocks 6 (a) Food Law and Regulations 6 (b) Food Control Management 7 (c) Inspection Services 7 (d) Laboratory Services: Food Monitoring and Epidemiological Data 8 (e) Information, Education, Communication and Training 9 5. STRENGTHENING NATIONAL FOOD CONTROL SYSTEMS 10 5.1 Principles of Food Control: Issues for Consideration 10 (a) Integrated farm-to-table concept 10 (b) Risk Analysis 11 (c) Transparency 11 (d) Regulatory Impact Assessment 11 5.2 Developing a National Food Control Strategy 12 (a) Collection of Information 12 (b) Development of Strategy 12 5.3 Strengthening Organizational Structures for National Food Control Systems 13 (a) Multiple Agency System 13 (b) Single Agency System 15 (c) Integrated System 15 5.4 Funding National Food Control Systems 16 6. SPECIFIC ISSUES OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 17 6.1 Food Systems 17 6.2 Food Processing Industry 17 6.3 Street Foods 17 6.4 Food Control Infrastructure and Resources 20 6.5 Technical Assistance: Role of International Agencies 20 Page iii ANNEX 1. Glossary 20 ANNEX 2. Addresses and Key Contacts 23 ANNEX 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants
    983 WHO Technical Report Series 983 Evaluation of certain food additives andcontaminants ofcertain additives food Evaluation Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants This report represents the conclusions of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee convened to evaluate the safety of various food additives and a food contaminant with a view to concluding as to safety concerns and to preparing specifications for identity and purity. The first part of the report contains a general discussion of the principles governing the toxicological evaluation of and assessment of dietary exposure to food additives. A summary follows of the Committee’s evaluations of Evaluation of certain technical, toxicological and dietary exposure data for seven food additives (advantame; glucoamylase from Trichoderma reesei expressed in Trichoderma reesei; glycerol ester of gum rosin; glycerol ester of tall oil rosin; glycerol ester of wood rosin; nisin; and octenyl succinic acid modified gum arabic) and an food additives and assessment of dietary exposure to cadmium from cocoa and cocoa products. Specifications for the following food additives were revised: annatto extracts contaminants (solvent-extracted bixin and solvent-extracted norbixin); Benzoe tonkinensis; food additives containing aluminium and/or silicon; mineral oil (medium viscosity); modified starches; paprika extract; phosphates (analytical methods for the determination of phosphorus and revision of specifications); 3-phytase Seventy-seventh report of the from Aspergillus niger expressed in Aspergillus niger; potassium aluminium WHO Technical Report Series Technical WHO Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on silicate; and potassium aluminium silicate–based pearlescent pigments. Food Additives Annexed to the report are tables summarizing the Committee’s recommendations for dietary exposures to and toxicological evaluations of the food additives and contaminant considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Modeling of a Metabolic Network to Study the Impact of Food Contaminants on Genomic Methylation and DNA Instability
    Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 2014, 2, 1-7 Published Online December 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jbm http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2014.210001 Mathematical Modeling of a Metabolic Network to Study the Impact of Food Contaminants on Genomic Methylation and DNA Instability Etienne Z. Gnimpieba1*, Souad Bousserouel2, Abalo Chango1 1Department of Nutritional Sciences and Health, EGEAL UPSP: 2007.05.137-Institut Polytechnique Lasalle Beauvais, Beauvais, France 2Laboratoire de Prévention Nutritionnelle du Cancer, Inserm U682-IRCAD, Strasbourg, France Email: [email protected] Received September 2014 Abstract Environmental contamination of food is a worldwide public health problem. Folate mediated one- carbon metabolism plays an important role in epigenetic regulation of gene expression and mu- tagenesis. Many contaminants in food cause cancer through epigenetic mechanisms and/or DNA instability i.e. default methylation of uracil to thymine, subsequent to the decrease of 5-methylte- trahydrofolate (5 mTHF) pool in the one-carbon metabolism network. Evaluating consequences of an exposure to food contaminants based on systems biology approaches is a promising alternative field of investigation. This report presents a dynamic mathematical modeling for the study of the alteration in the one-carbon metabolism network by environmental factors. It provides a model for predicting “the impact of arbitrary contaminants that can induce the 5 mTHF deficiency. The model allows for a given experimental condition, the analysis of DNA methylation activity and dumping methylation in the de novo pathway of DNA synthesis. Keywords DNA-Methylation, DNA Instability, Mathematical Modeling, Logic Programming, Metabolic Network, Food Contaminant 1. Introduction An inadequate methyl group donor enhances the risk of cancer because the one-carbon unit (CH3) has critical functions in biological methylation reactions such as DNA-cytosine methylation, and in DNA synthesis or repair [1]-[3].
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Food Safety and Quality with Nuclear Techniques
    Addressing food safety and quality with nuclear techniques Food safety and quality are a global concern, especially in addressing food security. The Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United @IAEA/L. Potterton Nations (FAO)/International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Division conducts research and supports capacity building on nuclear and isotopic techniques to support food safety/quality control systems. A significant constraint among many countries is limited laboratory capability and lack of reliable and cost effective analytical methods ©IAEA/Louise Potterton meeting national/international standards and guidelines. What FAO does • Conducts research and training on optimization of sample preparation using radioisotopes; Nuclear and isotopic analytical techniques add great radioisotopes for metabolic/transfer studies; and value to testing programmes by improving method stable isotope measurements (e.g. H, C, N, O, S, robustness and precision, facilitating the rapid testing B, Sr) to provide information on the geographical of several food samples for multiple contaminants and origin of food products; verifying integrity. • Assists member countries in applying Codex • Research, transfer and application of laboratory standards by developing, maintaining and updating radiometric and complementary analytical the Food Contaminant and Residue Information techniques for single and multiple food System database, and disseminating analytical contaminants, including veterinary drug and methods to support national residue monitoring pesticide
    [Show full text]
  • Part a Lessons from Health Hazards © Istockphoto/AVTG
    Lessons from health hazards Part A Lessons from health hazards © iStockphoto/AVTG Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation 13 Lessons from health hazards Contents — Part A 2 The precautionary principle and false alarms — lessons learned ������������������������� 17 2.1 'False alarms', 'regulatory abuse' and 'regulatory false positives' ...........................18 2.2 Identifying regulatory false positives .................................................................19 2.3 Mistaken false positives ...................................................................................19 2.4 Identified false positives .................................................................................25 2.5 Swine flu .......................................................................................................26 2.6 Food irradiation and consumer health ................................................................29 2.7 Discussion ....................................................................................................31 References ............................................................................................................37 3 Lead in petrol 'makes the mind give way' ............................................................ 46 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................47 3.2 Lead toxicity: some early warnings ...................................................................48 3.3 Lead in petrol 1922–1925:
    [Show full text]