DOCSLIB.ORG

Assuring Food Safety and Quality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ASSURING FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY: GUIDELINES FOR STRENGTHENING NATIONAL FOOD CONTROL SYSTEMS Joint FAO/WHO Publication TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PREAMBLE 1 2. INTRODUCTION 2 3. IMPORTANT FOOD ISSUES 3 3.1 Food Safety, Quality and Consumer Protection 3 3.2 Global Considerations 4 (a) International Trade 4 (b) Codex Alimentarius Commission 4 (c) SPS and TBT Agreements 4 4. ELEMENTS OF A NATIONAL FOOD CONTROL SYSTEM 6 4.1 Objectives 6 4.2 Scope 6 4.3 Building Blocks 6 (a) Food Law and Regulations 6 (b) Food Control Management 7 (c) Inspection Services 7 (d) Laboratory Services: Food Monitoring and Epidemiological Data 8 (e) Information, Education, Communication and Training 9 5. STRENGTHENING NATIONAL FOOD CONTROL SYSTEMS 10 5.1 Principles of Food Control: Issues for Consideration 10 (a) Integrated farm-to-table concept 10 (b) Risk Analysis 11 (c) Transparency 11 (d) Regulatory Impact Assessment 11 5.2 Developing a National Food Control Strategy 12 (a) Collection of Information 12 (b) Development of Strategy 12 5.3 Strengthening Organizational Structures for National Food Control Systems 13 (a) Multiple Agency System 13 (b) Single Agency System 15 (c) Integrated System 15 5.4 Funding National Food Control Systems 16 6. SPECIFIC ISSUES OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 17 6.1 Food Systems 17 6.2 Food Processing Industry 17 6.3 Street Foods 17 6.4 Food Control Infrastructure and Resources 20 6.5 Technical Assistance: Role of International Agencies 20 Page iii ANNEX 1. Glossary 20 ANNEX 2. Addresses and Key Contacts 23 ANNEX 3. Considerations of Food Safety and Consumer Protection 25 ANNEX 4. Understanding the Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission 29 ANNEX 5. Introducing the WTO SPS and TBT Agreements 36 ANNEX 6. Guidelines for Developing a National Food Law 54 ANNEX 7. Introducing JECFA, JMPR, JEMRA, and GM Food Risk Assessment 58 ANNEX 8. A Country Profile – Collection of Information 63 ANNEX 9. Case Studies – National Food Control Systems 65 ANNEX 10. Selected Organizational Components of a National Food Control Agency 70 ANNEX 11. Possible Activities to be Undertaken during the Establishment of a National Food Control Agency 73 Page iv 1. PREAMBLE Effective national food control systems are essential to protect the health and safety of domestic consumers. They are also critical in enabling countries to assure the safety and quality of their foods entering international trade and to ensure that imported foods conform to national requirements. The new global environment for food trade places considerable obligations on both importing and exporting countries to strengthen their food control systems and to implement and enforce risk-based food control strategies. Consumers are taking unprecedented interest in the way food is produced, processed and marketed, and are increasingly calling for their Governments to accept greater responsibility for food safety and consumer protection. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have a strong interest in promoting national food control systems that are based upon scientific principles and guidelines, and which address all sectors of the food chain. This is particularly important for developing countries as they seek to achieve improved food safety, quality and nutrition, but will require a high level of political and policy commitment. In many countries, effective food control is undermined by the existence of fragmented legislation, multiple jurisdictions, and weaknesses in surveillance, monitoring and enforcement. These guidelines seek to provide advice to national authorities on strategies to strengthen food control systems to protect public health, prevent fraud and deception, avoid food adulteration and facilitate trade. They will enable authorities to choose the most suitable options for their food control systems in terms of legislation, infrastructure and enforcement mechanisms. The document delineates the overarching principles of food control systems, and provides examples of possible infrastructures and approaches for national systems. The target users of these Guidelines are national authorities concerned with ensuring food safety and quality in the interests of public health and consumer protection. The Guidelines will also be of assistance to a range of other stakeholders including consumer groups, industry and trade organizations, farmer groups and any other groups or associations that influence national policy in this area. Page 1 2. INTRODUCTION The publication Assuring Food Safety and Quality: Guidelines for Strengthening National Food Control Systems was prepared to enable national authorities, particularly in developing countries, to improve their food control systems. These Guidelines replace the earlier FAO/WHO publication Guidelines for Developing an Effective National Food Control System (1976) - FAO Food Control Series No. 1; WHO Food Control No. 1. For over 25 years this publication has been the definitive reference for developing countries in planning, organizing, and implementing their national food control programmes. Much has changed in the intervening period. There have been advances in the control of foodborne hazards as well as improvements in food inspection and surveillance systems. Globalization of the food supply chain, the increasing importance of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, and the obligations emerging from the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreements have resulted in unprecedented interest in the development of food standards and regulations, and the strengthening of food control infrastructure at the country level. The challenges for food control authorities include: Increasing burden of foodborne illness and new and emerging foodborne hazards; Rapidly changing technologies in food production, processing and marketing; Developing science-based food control systems with a focus on consumer protection; International food trade and need for harmonization of food safety and quality standards; Changes in lifestyles, including rapid urbanization; and Growing consumer awareness of food safety and quality issues and increasing demand for better information. Globally, the incidence of foodborne diseases is increasing and international food trade is disrupted by frequent disputes over food safety and quality requirements. Many food control systems need to be revised and strengthened if improvements are to be realized. It has never been more important for developing countries to implement and enforce a food control system based on the modern concept of risk assessment. These Guidelines provide important information on the principles and practices of food control and the trend away from a merely punitive to a preventive approach to food control. Responsibility for food control in most countries is shared between different agencies or ministries. The roles and responsibilities of these agencies may be quite different and duplication of regulatory activity, fragmented surveillance and a lack of coordination are common. There may also be wide variations in expertise and resources between the different agencies, and the responsibility for protecting public health may conflict with obligations to facilitate trade or develop an industry or sector. These Guidelines provide information for government agencies to assist in the development of national food control systems and to promote effective collaboration between all sectors involved in the management and control of food safety and quality. They highlight the importance of developing effective relationships and mutual support among government agencies and institutions involved in food control and other stakeholders, particularly the food industry and consumer groups. Page 2 3. IMPORTANT FOOD ISSUES 3.1 Food Safety, Quality and Consumer Protection The terms food safety and food quality can sometimes be confusing. Food safety refers to all those hazards, whether chronic or acute, that may make food injurious to the health of the consumer. It is not negotiable. Quality includes all other attributes that influence a product’s value to the consumer. This includes negative attributes such as spoilage, contamination with filth, discoloration, off-odours and positive attributes such as the origin, colour, flavour, texture and processing method of the food. This distinction between safety and quality has implications for public policy and influences the nature and content of the food control system most suited to meet predetermined national objectives. Food control is defined as: ….a mandatory regulatory activity of enforcement by national or local authorities to provide consumer protection and ensure that all foods during production, handling, storage, processing, and distribution are safe, wholesome and fit for human consumption; conform to safety and quality requirements; and are honestly and accurately labelled as prescribed by law. The foremost responsibility of food control is to enforce the food law(s) protecting the consumer against unsafe, impure and fraudulently presented food by prohibiting the sale of food not of the nature, substance or quality demanded by the purchaser. Confidence in the safety and integrity of the food supply is an important requirement for consumers. Foodborne disease outbreaks involving agents such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella and chemical contaminants highlight problems with food safety and increase public anxiety that modern farming
Recommended publications
  • Wrong Perception and Scanty Knowledge on Food Handling: a Recipe for Food Contamination and Poisoning.”

    Wrong Perception and Scanty Knowledge on Food Handling: a Recipe for Food Contamination and Poisoning.”

    International Journal For Research In Health Sciences And Nursing ISSN: 2208-2670 “WRONG PERCEPTION AND SCANTY KNOWLEDGE ON FOOD HANDLING: A RECIPE FOR FOOD CONTAMINATION AND POISONING.” (1) SAMUEL AUGUSTINE TURAY BEIJING ADVANCED INNIVATION CENTER FOR FOOD NUTRITION AND HUMAN HEALTH (BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY), BEIJING 100048, CHINA [email protected] (2) SHAN LIANG SCHOOL OF FOOD CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, (BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY), BEIJING 100048, CHINA (3) MIN ZHANG ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER FOR FOOD AADDICTIVES (BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY), BEIJING 100048, CHINA (4) ADIKALI KABA SESAY BEIJING SPORT UNIVERSITY-CHINA [email protected] Abstract Food processing is of vital importance in maintaining proper health as well as avoiding food poisoning and food contamination. The study is focused on bringing to light the concept of food safety and food handling. It is believed by the researcher that Sierra Leoneans do have a little knowledge on handling food and this has resulted to series of infections. Keeping food is scientific and the illiteracy rate is high giving rise for more people not to be able to follow precautionary measures in handling food. The research also focused on bringing out the different methods of food contaminations. These vary from biological, chemical and physical means. The biological components covers bacterial, virus and parasites, while the chemicals level looks into Volume-3 | Issue-12 | December,2017 | Paper-3 29 International Journal For Research In Health Sciences And Nursing ISSN: 2208-2670 various toxin, natural and marine toxins were also covered. The methodology was mostly empirical as literatures were reviewed from other research done by other writers.
  • Guidelines on Food Fortification with Micronutrients

    Guidelines on Food Fortification with Micronutrients

    GUIDELINES ON FOOD FORTIFICATION FORTIFICATION FOOD ON GUIDELINES Interest in micronutrient malnutrition has increased greatly over the last few MICRONUTRIENTS WITH years. One of the main reasons is the realization that micronutrient malnutrition contributes substantially to the global burden of disease. Furthermore, although micronutrient malnutrition is more frequent and severe in the developing world and among disadvantaged populations, it also represents a public health problem in some industrialized countries. Measures to correct micronutrient deficiencies aim at ensuring consumption of a balanced diet that is adequate in every nutrient. Unfortunately, this is far from being achieved everywhere since it requires universal access to adequate food and appropriate dietary habits. Food fortification has the dual advantage of being able to deliver nutrients to large segments of the population without requiring radical changes in food consumption patterns. Drawing on several recent high quality publications and programme experience on the subject, information on food fortification has been critically analysed and then translated into scientifically sound guidelines for application in the field. The main purpose of these guidelines is to assist countries in the design and implementation of appropriate food fortification programmes. They are intended to be a resource for governments and agencies that are currently implementing or considering food fortification, and a source of information for scientists, technologists and the food industry. The guidelines are written from a nutrition and public health perspective, to provide practical guidance on how food fortification should be implemented, monitored and evaluated. They are primarily intended for nutrition-related public health programme managers, but should also be useful to all those working to control micronutrient malnutrition, including the food industry.
  • Environmental Contaminants in Food

    Environmental Contaminants in Food

    Environmental Contaminants in Food December 1979 NTIS order #PB80-153265 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 79-600207 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock No. 052-003-00724-0 FOREWORD This report presents the major findings of an OTA assessment of Federal and State efforts to deal with the environmental contamination of food. Undertaken at the request of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, the study examines both regulatory approaches and monitoring strategies for coping with contaminated food. The assessment is concerned with chemical and radioactive contaminants that inadvertently find their way into the human food supply. To bring the scope of inquiry within manageable bounds, we excluded naturally occurring toxins such as fungal and microbial toxins. The Office of Technology Assessment was assisted by two advisory panels of scientists and representatives of public interest groups, agriculture, the chemical industry, fisheries, and State and foreign governments. The Food and Drug Ad- ministration, the Department of Agriculture, and the Environmental Protection Agency each designated staff members to attend panel meetings, provide back- ground information, and review draft reports, Background papers were commis- sioned concerning the scientific aspects of detecting and regulating environ- mental contaminants in food. The Congressional Research Service provided five analyses of previous food contamination episodes, Reviews of the draft report were provided by the advisory panels, Federal agencies, and a number of inter- ested individuals not previously involved with the assessment. Because this assessment addresses concerns of American citizens as well as policy makers and scientists, the summary of the report is also being published as a separate document.
  • Ventive Behaviors of Consumers with Food Allergies About Dining Out: a Focus Group Study Junehee Kwon1* and Yee Ming Lee2 1Dept

    Ventive Behaviors of Consumers with Food Allergies About Dining Out: a Focus Group Study Junehee Kwon1* and Yee Ming Lee2 1Dept

    Food Protection Trends, Vol. 32, No. 12, Pages 736–746 Copyright© 2012, International Association for Food Protection ARTICLES 6200 Aurora Ave., Suite 200W, Des Moines, IA 50322-2864 Exploration of Past Exper- iences, Attitudes and Pre- ventive Behaviors of Consumers with Food Allergies about Dining Out: A Focus Group Study JUNEHEE KWON1* and YEE MING LEE2 1Dept. of Hospitality Management and Dietetics, Kansas State University, 108 Justin Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA; 2Dept. of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Hospitality Management, Auburn University, 328 Spindle Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, USA SUMMARY This study investigated the attitudes and behaviors of consumers with food allergies toward dining out. Four focus groups with 17 individuals with food allergies were conducted to learn about their dining experiences. All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and organized for extracting key concepts. Eight participants experienced allergic reactions after dining out at the restaurants, and many had unpleasant experiences when dining out. Participants perceived cross- contact, hidden ingredients, and miscommunication as potential causes of food allergic reactions. Participants identified lack of training, awareness, and knowledge about food allergy, and other operational restrictions such as lack of resources, as barriers to providing allergen-free food in restaurants. Buffet, ethnic, and specialty restaurants were seen as high-risk dining places due to potential risks of cross-contacts and hidden allergens in sauces. The participants took various precautions such as asking for clarifications of ingredients and seeking restaurants that are familiar to them. Consumers with food allergies experienced many difficulties in restaurants due to restaurant employees’ lack of knowledge and training regarding food allergy.
  • No. 34 the Right to Adequate Food

    No. 34 the Right to Adequate Food

    UNITED NATIONS The Right to Adequate Food Human Rights Human Rights Fact Sheet No. 34 The Right to Adequate Food Fact Sheet No. 34 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations or the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Material contained in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, provided credit is given and a copy of the publication containing the reprinted material is sent to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Palais des Nations, 8–14 avenue de la Paix, CH–1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. ii CONTENTS Page Abbreviations . iv Introduction . 1 I. WHAT IS THE RIGHT TO FOOD? . 2 A. Key aspects of the right to food . 2 B. Common misconceptions about the right to food. 3 C. The link between the right to food and other human rights . 5 D. The right to food in international law. 7 II. HOW DOES THE RIGHT TO FOOD APPLY TO SPECIFIC GROUPS?. 9 A. The rural and urban poor . 10 B. Indigenous peoples. 12 C. Women . 14 D. Children. 16 III. WHAT ARE THE OBLIGATIONS ON STATES AND THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF OTHERS? . 17 A. Three types of obligations. 17 B. Progressive and immediate obligations . 19 C. Obligations with international dimensions . 22 D. The responsibilities of others.
  • Quality Control a Model Program for the Food Industry

    Quality Control a Model Program for the Food Industry

    Quality Control A Model Program for the Food Industry The dictionary defines quality as an important character, a degree of excellence or a necessary attribute. A group of activities designed to assure a standard of excellence is called Quality Control. Food is basic for life. Quality or excellence in our food supply should be an important concern to all food processors. Safety and wholesomeness are the most important attributes of food quality. The lack of quality as it relates to safety and wholesomeness can result in personal injury, sick-ness or death. Food- borne illness is an example of sickness or even death when unsafe foods are produced and eaten. Certain foods or food products are defined by regulations or policies called standards of identity. These standards of identity are definitions for a specific food product to avoid confusion or mislabeling of similar processed foods. Milk is a good example. The standard for skim milk is less than 1/2 percent fat, while the standard for whole milk is at least 3-1/4 percent fat. Quality defined by regulations, policies or standards is controlled by federal and state agencies. Failure to meet the degree of excellence defined by the regulations, policies or standards of identity is illegal. The government-controlled attributes of food are another important measure of food quality. Therefore, the first category of food quality iscritical attributes and includes factors that affect safety, wholesomeness or legality. Commitment + Awareness + Teamwork + Communication + Quality Control = Safe, Wholesome and Consistent Food Products Figure 1. Quality is everyone’s business. The organizational structure, a reporting system and open communication are necessary for success.
  • Introduction to Food and Food Processing

    Introduction to Food and Food Processing

    2010 INTRODUCTION TO ANDFOOD FOOD PROCESSING – I TRAINING MANUAL FOR FOOD SAFETY REGULATORS Vol THE TRAINING MANUAL FOR FOOD SAFETY REGULATORS WHO ARE INVOLVED IN IMPLEMENTING FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT 2006 ACROSS THE COUNTRY FOODS SAFETY & STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE) FDA BHAVAN, KOTLA ROAD, NEW DELHI – 110 002 Website: www.fssai.gov.in INDEX TRAINING MANUAL FOR FOOD SAFETY OFFICERS Sr Subject Topics Page No No 1 INTRODUCTION TO INTRODUCTION TO FOOD FOOD – ITS Carbohydrates, Protein, fat, Fibre, Vitamins, Minerals, ME etc. NUTRITIONAL, Effect of food processing on food nutrition. Basics of Food safety TECHNOLOGICAL Food Contaminants (Microbial, Chemical, Physical) AND SAFETY ASPECTS Food Adulteration (Common adulterants, simple tests for detection of adulteration) Food Additives (Classification, functional role, safety issues) Food Packaging & labelling (Packaging types, understanding labelling rules & 2 to 100 Regulations, Nutritional labelling, labelling requirements for pre-packaged food as per CODEX) INTRODUCTION OF FOOD PROCESSING AND TECHNOLOGY F&VP, Milk, Meat, Oil, grain milling, tea-Coffee, Spices & condiments processing. Food processing techniques (Minimal processing Technologies, Photochemical processes, Pulsed electric field, Hurdle Technology) Food Preservation Techniques (Pickling, drying, smoking, curing, caning, bottling, Jellying, modified atmosphere, pasteurization etc.) 2 FOOD SAFETY – A Codex Alimentarius Commission (CODEX) GLOBAL Introduction Standards, codes
  • Correlation Between Total DDT Residues in Blood and Fat of Beef Animals 1

    Correlation Between Total DDT Residues in Blood and Fat of Beef Animals 1

    948 Journal ofFood Protection Vol. 42, No. 12, Pages 948-949 (December, 1979) Copyright © 1979, International Association of Milk, Food, and Environmental Sanitarians Correlation Between Total DDT Residues in Blood and Fat of Beef Animals 1 M. DE CAMPOS2•, C. E. GUTIERREZ B. and A. E. OLSZYNA-MARZYS3 Institute ofNutrition ofCentral America and Panama (JNCAP), Apartado Posta! I I 88, Guatemala City, Guatemala, Central America (Received for publication February 26. 1979) ABSTRACT MATERIALS Al'.lJ METHODS Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/42/12/948/1649976/0362-028x-42_12_948.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 In Guatemala, where in certain regions heavily pesticide-sprayed Samples cotton fields are interspersed with pastures for cattle, pesticide residues Samples of blood and fat were collected from 30 bovines of different in beef fat represent a problem. Organochlorine pesticides are still sex and breed in the Department of Escuintla on the Pacific Coast. widely used and even if the use of DDT has been decreasing over the Twenty ml of blood were taken by puncture of the jugular vein and last few years, this pesticide is still a major food contaminant. The collected in glass tubes containing 4 drops of heparin as an present study was undertaken to establish if a correlation between total anticoagulant. The tubes, as well as all the glassware used for analysis, DDT levels in blood and fat could be found. Samples of blood and fat were previously washed with soap and water, rinsed with tap water and from 30 bovines were analyzed by gas-liquid chromatography.
  • Interactive Comment on “Food Quality Regulates the Metabolism and Reproduction of Temora Longicornis” by R

    Interactive Comment on “Food Quality Regulates the Metabolism and Reproduction of Temora Longicornis” by R

    Biogeosciences Discuss., 10, C182–C185, 2013 Biogeosciences www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/10/C182/2013/ Discussions © Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribute 3.0 License. Interactive comment on “Food quality regulates the metabolism and reproduction of Temora longicornis” by R. Nobili et al. Anonymous Referee #1 Received and published: 2 March 2013 Please revise according to the suggestions and comments below. P 3204: are C:P and C:N ratios merely “indicators” of food quality or are they actually determi- native of food quality? “with a food quality of 16N : 1P.” ????? strange phrase. You should say “with and N:P ratio fo 16”. I can’t see how “food quality” can have units of N:P ratio! “the Threshold Elemental Ratio (TER)” This is NOT how TER is defined according to existing stoichiometry theory. TER is the C:X ratio above which growth becomes X- limited. At this point in abstract better to just say that 16:1 defines the optimum diet for Temora. C182 “phytoplankton organic N : P ratios can change on decadal timescales” They can also change on time scales much shorter than decadal! P 3205 Again, C:P and C:N ratios are not necessarily merely “indicators” of quality. But in many cases they are the DETERMINANTS of quality. That is, high C:P ratio means that that P is diluted into too much C, making it impossible to ingest P at a sufficient rate to maximize growth. But of course, as Tang and Dam (and others point out) often other things (such as PUFAs and amino acids and sterols etc) are co-varying with C:nutrient ratio.
  • Рhysicochemical and Textural Properties of Reduced Sugar Jellies from Physalis Peruviana L

    Рhysicochemical and Textural Properties of Reduced Sugar Jellies from Physalis Peruviana L

    ─── Food Technology ─── Рhysicochemical and textural properties of reduced sugar jellies from Physalis peruviana L. fruit Raina Hadjikinova1, Stanko Stankov1,Venelina Popova1, Tanya Ivanova1, Albena Stoyanova1, Nadezhda Mazova1, Maria Marudova2, Stanka Damyanova3 1 – University of Food Technologies, Plovdiv, Bulgaria 2 – Plovdiv University “Paisii Hilendarski”, Plovdiv, Bulgaria 3 – University of Russe, Branch Razgrad, Bulgaria Abstract Keywords: Introduction. Physalis peruviana L. fruit contain various functional compounds with health promoting effects. The aim of Physalis this study was to investigate the possibility of obtaining reduced peruviana L. sugar jellies from physalis juice with different sugars and sugar Maltitol substitues. Fructose Materials and methods. Jellies containing physalis juice and Jelly sucrose (sample S), fructose (sample F) or maltitol and maltitol syrup Functional (sample M), respectively, were prepared and studied. Results and discussion. There were no significant differences between the samples in terms of dry matter content, titratable Article history: acidity and pH. The highest total sugar content was found in sample S (72.68%), and the lowest – in sample M (7.12%). Sample M had Received about 90% lower total sugar content than sample S and about 83% 04.02.2019 lower than sample F. Therefore, according to EU Regulation No Received in revised 1924/2006, the jelly with maltitol/maltitol syrup can be classified form 21.04.2019 with a nutrition claim “Food with no added sugars”. Due to its Accepted composition, the same nutrition claim can be ascribed to sample F. 30.09.2019 Sample F had the biggest sorption capacity, in which an absorption process was observed, and the moisture content of the jelly Corresponding increased from 28.23% to 32.65% after 120 h.
  • SQF Food Safety Code for Manufacture of Food Packaging EDITION 8

    SQF Food Safety Code for Manufacture of Food Packaging EDITION 8

    SQF Food Safety Code for Manufacture of Food Packaging EDITION 8 2345 Crystal Drive, Suite 800 • Arlington, VA 22202 USA 202.220.0635 • www.sqfi.com ©2017 Food Marketing Institute. All rights reserved. The SQF Code, Edition 8 Introduction First published May 1995 © 2017 Food Marketing Institute (FMI). All rights reserved. First Printed May 1995 No portion of this document may be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the Food Marketing Institute. For permission contact FMI at 2345 Crystal Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA. Care should be taken to ensure that material used is from the current edition of the Code and that it is updated whenever the Code is amended or revised. The date of the Code should therefore be clearly identified. Suggestions for improvements to this Code are encouraged from all parties. Written comments are to be sent to SQFI at 2345 Crystal Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA. SQF Code edition 8 © 2017 Food Marketing Institute. All rights reserved. 1 The SQF Code, Edition 8 Introduction First published May 1995 SQF Code, edition 8 The Safe Quality Food Institute’s (SQFI) SQF Code, edition 8 has been updated and redesigned in 2017 for use by all sectors of the food industry from primary production to storage and distribution and now includes a food safety code for retailers. It replaces the SQF Code, edition 7. The SQF Code is a site-specific, process and product certification standard with an emphasis on the systematic application of CODEX Alimentarius Commission HACCP principles and guidelines for control of food safety and food quality hazards.
  • Food & Nutrition Journal

    Food & Nutrition Journal

    Food & Nutrition Journal Bajwa U and Goraya RK. Food Nutr J 1: 115. DOI: 10.29011/2575-7091.100015 Review Articles The Sweetness Technology of Sugar Substituted Low-Calorie Beverages Rajpreet Kaur Goraya, Usha Bajwa* Department of Food Science and Technology, Punjab Agricultural University, India *Corresponding author: Usha Bajwa, Department of Food Science and Technology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhi- ana-141004, India, E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Bajwa U and Goraya RK (2016) The Sweetness Technology of Sugar Substituted Low-Calorie Beverages. Food Nutr J 1: 115. DOI: 10.29011/2575-7091.100015 Received Date: 15 November, 2016; Accepted Date: 12 December, 2016; Published Date: 16 December, 2016 Abstract A perturbing increase in the number of diabetics and obese people in all age groups of the population has raised concern in the scientific and industrial community to develop low calorie or no added sugar beverages. Nowadays such sugar-free beverages are gaining popularity because of their inherent thirst quenching properties and fewer calories. Production of such beverages has been possible with the replacement of sugar and incorporation of artificial sweeteners which are low/free in calorie content. The sweetness technology for low-calorie beverages has attained strong commer- cial success with the safe use of non-nutritive sweeteners that deliver good taste quality. However, some considerations for their efficient use include their solubility and stability in beverage systems along with cost effectiveness. The assess- ment of non-nutritive sweeteners shows that high-potency artificial non-caloric, include synthetic sweeteners, i.e. as- partame, acesulfame-K, Cyclamate, Neotame, Saccharin and Sucralose whereas natural ones embrace Stevia and Monk Fruit extract.