DOCSLIB.ORG

Snoquera Landscape Analysis Draft Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Snoquera Landscape Analysis Draft Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Snoquera Landscape Analysis Draft Environmental Assessment Snoqualmie Ranger District, Mt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, King and Pierce Counties, WA December 2018 For More Information Contact: Snoqualmie Ranger District 902 SE North Bend Way North Bend, WA 98045 (425) 888-1421 Cover Picture: Snoquera Falls, WA. Photo Credit: Julie Okita The name Snoquera originates from the amalgamation of "Snoqualmie" and "Emergency Relief Appropriations" (ERA) Act of 1935 - part of Roosevelt's New Deal programs. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632- 9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by mail to U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Ave SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; fax: (202) 690-7442; or email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. i Format of this Environmental Assessment CEQ regulations define an environmental assessment as A concise public document that serves to “briefly provide sufficient evidence and analysis for determining whether to prepare an environmental impact statement or a finding of no significant impact (FONSI).” This environmental assessment focuses on what is relevant and important and concentrates on the issues that are truly significant to the action in question, rather than amassing needless detail (40 CFR 1500.1). Legal requirements only requires the EA to provide enough evidence to support our conclusions, address relevant environmental impacts and concentrates on whether the action would “significantly” affect the quality of the human environment. Therefore this environmental assessment does not include some topics that are not required in an environmental document but have historically been included. Topics that have been eliminated are: project summary, NEPA process language, lengthy list of forest plan standard and guidelines, irreversible and irretrievable commitment section, list of preparers, and appendices. Contents Format of this Environmental Assessment ...................................................................................... ii Contents ........................................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location .......................................................................................................................... 1 Tribal Consultation .......................................................................................................................... 4 Public Involvement .......................................................................................................................... 5 Management Direction .................................................................................................................... 6 Land Allocations ......................................................................................................................... 7 Travel Analysis and the MBS Sustainable Roads Strategy ......................................................... 9 Survey and Manage Direction ................................................................................................... 10 Need for the Proposal .................................................................................................................... 12 Landscape Restoration Context for Snoquera Project Area ...................................................... 13 2017 Fires Context for Snoquera Project Area ......................................................................... 18 Proposed Action and Alternatives ................................................................................................. 20 Summary of Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 20 Alternative 1 – No Action ......................................................................................................... 22 Alternative 2 - Proposed Action ................................................................................................ 22 Terrestrial Restoration ........................................................................................................... 23 Transportation System ........................................................................................................... 32 Watershed Restoration........................................................................................................... 39 Recreation Enhancement ....................................................................................................... 45 Alternative 3 .............................................................................................................................. 55 Project Design Criteria and Mitigation Measures ..................................................................... 57 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study .................................................. 81 Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action and Alternatives................................................. 83 Forest Vegetation ...................................................................................................................... 83 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 83 Affected Environment ........................................................................................................... 84 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................... 86 ii Wildlife ..................................................................................................................................... 94 Affected Environment ........................................................................................................... 94 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................... 99 Aquatic Resources ................................................................................................................... 162 Botanical Resources ................................................................................................................ 200 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 200 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 205 Alternative 3 ........................................................................................................................ 209 Invasive Plants ..................................................................................................................... 209 Alternative 2 ........................................................................................................................ 211 Alternative 3 ........................................................................................................................ 211 Compliance with law, regulation, policy, and the Forest Plan ............................................ 212 Recreation ............................................................................................................................... 214 Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... 214 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................. 215 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................................................. 223 Affected Environment ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • Chugach State Park Management Plan
    CHUGACH STATE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN Adopted February 2016 CHUGACH STATE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN Adopted February 2016 Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation Cover photos courtesy of: Bull Moose Fight by: Donna Dewhurst Northern Lights Rainbow by: Larry Anderson Falls Creek- Turnagain by: Stephen Nickel Bird Ridge by: Wayne Todd Lupine At Chugach and Eklutna Lake by: Jeff Nelson Evening Beaver Ponds by: Jim Wood Credits and Acknowledgements Planning Team Monica Alvarez, Project Manager/Planner, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water Amanda Hults, Planner, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water Thomas Harrison, Chugach State Park Superintendent, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation Matthew Wedeking, Chugach State Park Chief Ranger, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation Ruth Booth, Publisher, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining, Land & Water Plan Contributors Acknowledgements are gratefully due to the following Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation staff for their help in the planning process and contributions to the plan: Thomas Crockett, Kurt Hensel, Preston Kroes, Ian Thomas, and Keith Wilson- Former and Present Chugach State Park Rangers; Blaine Smith- Chugach State Park Specialist; Bill Evans- Former Landscape Architect; Lucille Baranko- Landscape Specialist; Claire Leclair- Chief of Field Operations; Ben Ellis- Director;
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Vina Plains Preserve Wurlitzer Unit
    DO r:r:i :;:i·,iOVE Ff.'f)l,1 . ,- . - . "'I":; Vascular Plants of Vina Plains Preserve, Wurlitzer Unit Vernon H. Oswald Vaseular Plants of Vina Plains Preserve, Wurlitzer Unit Vernon H . Oswald Department of Biological Sciences California State University, C h ico Ch ico, California 95929-0515 1997 Revision RED BLUFF •CORN ING TEHAMA CO. -------------B1JITECO. ORLAND HWY 32 FIGURE I. Location of Vina P la.ins Preserve, Main Unit on the north, Wurlitzer Unit on the south. CONTENTS Figure 1. Location of Vina Plains Preserve ...... ................................. facing contents Figure 2. Wurlitzer Unit, Vina Plains Preserve ..... ............................... facing page I Introduction .. ... ..................................... ................................ ....... ....... ... ................ I References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4 The Plant List: Ferns and fem allies .......... ................................................... ........... ................. 5 Di cot flowering plants ............... ...................................................... ................. 5 Monocot flowering plants .......... ..................................................................... 25 / ... n\ a: t, i. FIGURE 2. Wurlitzer Unit, Vina Plains Preserve (in yellow), with a small comer of the Main Unit showing on the north. Modified from USGS 7.5' topographic maps, Richardson Springs NW & Nord quadrangles. - - INTRODUCTION 1 A survey of the vascular flora of the Wurl itzer
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Hoverfly Cheilosia Urbana (Diptera: Syrphidae)
    USDA iiillllllllll United States Department of Field release of the hoverfly Agriculture Cheilosia urbana (Diptera: Marketing and Regulatory Syrphidae) for biological Programs control of invasive Pilosella species hawkweeds (Asteraceae) in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, July 2019 Field release of the hoverfly Cheilosia urbana (Diptera: Syrphidae) for biological control of invasive Pilosella species hawkweeds (Asteraceae) in the contiguous United States. Environmental Assessment, July 2019 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. To File a Program Complaint If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF), found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing the Poaceae Treatment for the Flora of Oregon Global Plants Initiative
    VOLUME 17, NUMBER 1 OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY AUGUST 2011 Global Plants Initiative Writing the Poaceae Treatment by Troy Maddux and Aaron Liston for the Flora of Oregon by Barbara L. Wilson, Carex Working Group The Oregon State University Herbarium has joined the Global Plants Initiative, an international partnership of The Carex Working Group is thrilled and relieved. We herbaria working to create a coordinated global database have completed the grass treatment for the Oregon Flora of information and images of plant specimens. With Project! support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the OSU Mystified that our work has taken more than a year, Herbarium has obtained a custom HerbScan machine and friends suggested that writing the grass treatment must be the resources to scan the 2,000-plus type specimens in the easy now that the Flora of North America (FNA) grass herbarium. volumes have been published. We would reply that writing Type specimens are very important to plant taxonomists the Oregon grass treatment has not meant simply stripping as the type is the physical representative and ultimate all the non-Oregon grasses from the FNA treatment. reference for every described species (or subspecific taxon). What did we actually do? Once described, type specimens will always represent First, we sought to write a simple key to Oregon’s grass that taxon unless lost or destroyed. Because they are so genera. Early leads of the FNA key are intimidating, and important, types are given special status in herbaria, along grass keys from the Jepson Manual (JM) and Vascular with extra protections to keep them safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This Is a Consolidated List Of
    RWKiger 26 Jul 18 Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 24 and 25. In citations of articles, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix "a"; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with "b". Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes. Aares, E., M. Nurminiemi, and C. Brochmann. 2000. Incongruent phylogeographies in spite of similar morphology, ecology, and distribution: Phippsia algida and P. concinna (Poaceae) in the North Atlantic region. Pl. Syst. Evol. 220: 241–261. Abh. Senckenberg. Naturf. Ges. = Abhandlungen herausgegeben von der Senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft. Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Bot. = Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica. Acta Horti Bot. Prag. = Acta Horti Botanici Pragensis. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. = Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica. [Shokubutsu Bunrui Chiri.] Acta Phytotax.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Rare Plants of Misty Fiords National Monument, Usda Forest Service, Region Ten
    AN INVENTORY OF RARE PLANTS OF MISTY FIORDS NATIONAL MONUMENT, USDA FOREST SERVICE, REGION TEN A Report by John DeLapp Alaska Natural Heritage Program ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 February 8, 1994 ALASKA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE 707 A Street • Anchorage, Alaska 99501 • (907) 279-4523 • Fax (907) 276-6847 Dr. Douglas A. Segar, Director Dr. David C. Duffy, Program Manager (UAA IS AN EO/AA EMPLOYER AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION) 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This cooperative project was the result of many hours of work by people within the Misty Fiords National Monument and the Ketchikan Area of the U.S. Forest Service who were dedicated to our common objectives and we are grateful to them all. Misty Fiords personnel who were key to the initiation and realization of this project include Jackie Canterbury and Don Fisher. Becky Nourse, Mark Jaqua, and Jan Peloskey all provided essential support during the field surveys. Also, Ketchikan Area staff Cole Crocker-Bedford, Michael Brown, and Richard Guhl provided indispensable support. Others outside of the Forest Service have provided assistance, without which this report would not be possible. Of particular note are Dr. David Murray, Dr. Barbara Murray, Carolyn Parker, and Al Batten of the University of Alaska Fairbanks Museum Herbarium. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers of Polish Hieracia (Asteraceae)
    Polish Botanical Journal 50(2): 139–143, 2005 CHROMOSOME NUMBERS OF POLISH HIERACIA (ASTERACEAE) ZBIGNIEW SZELĄG & VLADIMIR VLADIMIROV Abstract. Chromosome numbers are given for the following species of Hieracium L. from Poland: subgenus Hieracium – H. barbatum Tausch (2n = 27), H. bupleuroides C. C. Gmelin (2n = 36), H. laevigatum Willd. (2n = 27), H. laurinum Arvet- Touvet (2n = 18), H. sabaudum L. (2n = 27, 36), H. umbellatum L. (2n = 18), H. villosum Jacq. (2n = 36); subgenus Pilosella (Hill.) Gray – H. lactucella Wallr. (2n = 18), H. schultesii F. W. Schultz (2n = 36). The chromosome number of H. barbatum is published for the fi rst time. The diploid number is reported for the fi rst time for H. laurinum. Except for H. umbellatum and H. villosum, the chromosome counts are reported for the fi rst time from Poland. Key words: Asteraceae, Hieracium, chromosome numbers, karyotypes, Poland Zbigniew Szeląg, Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512 Kraków, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Vladimir Vladimirov, Institute of Botany, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 23, Acad. G. Bonchev St., Sofi a 1113, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Publications dealing with karyology of Polish alcohol (1:3) for at least 2 h at room temperature, vascular plants give only sparse data on repre- hydrolyzed in 1 M HCl for 20 min at 60°C, stained in sentatives of the genus Hieracium L. (Skalińska Gomori’s hematoxylin (Melander & Wingstrand 1953) et al. 1959, 1968, 1974; Skalińska 1967, 1970; for 30 min at 60°C, and fi nally squashed in 45% acetic acid.
    [Show full text]
  • Loch Lomond Vernal Pool Ecological Reserve Draft
    LOCH LOMOND VERNAL POOL ECOLOGICAL RESERVE DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by: Debra Eakins Regional Contact: Ann Howald P.O. Box7241 Departmentof Fishand Game Cotati, CA 94931 P.O. Box 47 Yountville, CA 94599 The following regional functional supervisors have reviewed and concur with this plan: Environmental Services Date FisheriesManagement Date NaturalHeritage Date WildlifeProtection Date WildlifeManagement Date Approved by: RegionalManager Date Director Date State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DRAFT MANAGEMENT PLAN for Loch Lomond Vernal Pool Ecological Reserve September 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of Acquisition i B. AcquisitionHistory l C. Purposeof ThisManagementPlan 1 H. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A. Geographical Setting 2 B. Property Boundaries and Adjacent Lands 2 C. Geology, Soils, Climate, Hydrology 6 D. Cultural Features 6 lB. HABITAT AND SPECIES DESCRIPTION A. Vegetative Communities, Habitats and Plant Species 7 B. Animal Species 7 C. Endangered, Threatened and Rare Species 8 IV. MANAGEMENT GOALS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. DefinitionsofTermsUsedin ThisPlan 10 B. Biological Elements: Goals, Objectives & Environmental Impacts 10 C. Public Use Elements: Goals, Objectives & Environmental Impacts 12 D. Facility Maintenance Elements: Goals, Objectives & Environmental 13 Impacts V. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SUMMARY 14 VI. REFERENCES 16 APPENDICES I. LIST OF VASCULAR PLANTS OF LLER 11. POPULATION CENSUS OF ERYNGIUM CONSTANCEI rll. ECOLOGY AND HABITAT OF ERYNGIUMSPECIES - BIBLIOGRAPHY IV. WHR SPECIES LIST V. BOGGS LAKE VASCULAR PLANT LIST VI. RARE PLANT MONITORING REPORT FOR BOGGS LAKE, 1991 I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of Acquisition 1. Protection of habitat for the only known occurrence of Loch Lomond Button Celery (ErJ4_um constancez), a State-candidate Endangered species (at the time of acquisition).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Morphology and the Role of Hybridization As Driving Force Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/707588; this version posted July 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Phylogeny, morphology and the role of hybridization as driving force of evolution in 2 grass tribes Aveneae and Poeae (Poaceae) 3 4 Natalia Tkach,1 Julia Schneider,1 Elke Döring,1 Alexandra Wölk,1 Anne Hochbach,1 Jana 5 Nissen,1 Grit Winterfeld,1 Solveig Meyer,1 Jennifer Gabriel,1,2 Matthias H. Hoffmann3 & 6 Martin Röser1 7 8 1 Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical 9 Garden, Dept. of Systematic Botany, Neuwerk 21, 06108 Halle, Germany 10 2 Present address: German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Deutscher 11 Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 12 3 Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical 13 Garden, Am Kirchtor 3, 06108 Halle, Germany 14 15 Addresses for correspondence: Martin Röser, [email protected]; Natalia 16 Tkach, [email protected] 17 18 ABSTRACT 19 To investigate the evolutionary diversification and morphological evolution of grass 20 supertribe Poodae (subfam. Pooideae, Poaceae) we conducted a comprehensive molecular 21 phylogenetic analysis including representatives from most of their accepted genera. We 22 focused on generating a DNA sequence dataset of plastid matK gene–3'trnK exon and trnL– 23 trnF regions and nuclear ribosomal ITS1–5.8S gene–ITS2 and ETS that was taxonomically 24 overlapping as completely as possible (altogether 257 species).
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Hieracium (Asteraceae) in Catalonia (Northeastern Iberian Peninsula, Spain)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositori d'Objectes Digitals per a l'Ensenyament la Recerca i... Flora Montiberica 65: 88-121 (XI-2016). ISSN 1138-5952, edic. digital: 1988-799X THE GENUS HIERACIUM (ASTERACEAE) IN CATALONIA (NORTHEASTERN IBERIAN PENINSULA, SPAIN) Llorenç SÁEZ GOÑALONS1 & Gonzalo MATEO SANZ2 1Unitat de Botànica, Facultat de Biociències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra (Barcelona). [email protected] 2Jardín Botánico. Universidad de Valencia. C/ Quart, 80. 46008-Valencia. [email protected] ABSTRACT: An account of the Hieracium species of Catalonia (northeastern Spain) is presented. Comments on the distribution and the taxonomic relationships are provided for a total of 141 accepted species. Key words: Hieracium, Aste- raceae, taxonomy, northeastern Iberian Peninsula, Catalonia, Spain. RESUMEN: El género Hieracium (Asteraceae) en Cataluña. Se presenta un listado comentado de las especies actualmente conocidas en Cataluña, con refe- rencias a su distribución y relaciones taxonómicas, afectando a un total de 141 uni- dades. Palabras clave: Hieracium, Asteraceae, taxonomía, Cataluña, España. INTRODUCTION nized 279 taxa at species and subspecies level (of which only 69 are species). Later The genus Hieracium L. in the narrow new taxonomic concepts were proposed sense (Hieracium subgen. Hieracium) be- mainly by G. Mateo (MATEO, 2004, 2005, longs to one of the taxonomically most in- 2006a, 2006b, 2007a, 2007b, 2008, 2012, tricate groups of vascular plants (CHRTEK 2013, 2016a, 2016b, MATEO & ALEJAN- & al. 2004; GREUTER, 2007). Hybridiza- DRE, 2006, MATEO & EGIDO, 2014, 2015, tion, apomixis, and polyploidy are putati- MATEO & al., 2016, MATEO & SÁEZ 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • The Characteristics of Plants from Hieracium Genre Present in Alexandru Beldie Hierbarium from I.N.C.D.S
    LUCRĂRI ŞTIINŢIFICE SERIA HORTICULTURĂ, 60 (2) / 2017, USAMV IAŞI THE CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANTS FROM HIERACIUM GENRE PRESENT IN ALEXANDRU BELDIE HIERBARIUM FROM I.N.C.D.S. BUCHAREST CARACTERISTICI ALE SPECIILOR DE PLANTE DIN GENUL HIERACIUM EXISTENTE ÎN HERBARUL ALEXANDRU BELDIE AL I.N.C.D.S. BUCUREŞTI DINCĂ L.1, VASILE Diana1, VOICULESCU I.1 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The Alexandru Beldie Herbarium from I.N.C.D.S. Bucharest comprises approximately 60.000 plates of some herbaceous plants, trees and shrubs. Amongst them, the present article analyses the 273 plates dedicated to the plants from the Hieracium genre. After a short description of the genre, some of the 112 species present in this herbarium are described. The plants were gathered between 1858 and 1954, with a larger incidence in the periods 1890-1899 and 1940-1949. Their origin ranges from different areas of our country (Bucegi, Ciucas, Retezat, Turda, Buftea, Pojorata) as well as from abroad (Pyrenees, Tirol, Silesia) and were gathered by Romanian specialists (Beldie, Morariu, Georgescu, Cretzoiu) and foreign ones (Stefanoff, Baenitz, Richter, Weisenbeck, Sagorski, Weisenbach, Wolff). Key words: Hieracium, herbarium, inventory, botany specialists Rezumat. Herbarul Alexandru Beldie al I.N.C.D.S. Bucureşti este alcătuit din aproximativ 60.000 de planşe ale unor plante, arbori şi arbuşti. Articolul de faţă analizează 273 de astfel de planşe aparţinând genului Hieracium. După o scurtă descriere a genului, câteva dintre cele 112 specii prezente în herbar sunt descrise. Plantele au fost recoltate între anii 1854-1954, majoritatea datând din perioada 1890-1899 şi 1940-1949.
    [Show full text]