DOCSLIB.ORG

Proceedings of the Third Annual Northeastern Forest Insect Work Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proceedings of the Third Annual Northeastern Forest Insect Work Conference Proceedings of the Third Annual Northeastern Forest Insect Work Conference New Haven, Connecticut 17 -19 February 1970 U.S. D.A. FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH PAPER NE-194 1971 NORTHEASTERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION, UPPER DARBY, PA. FOREST SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WARREN T. DOOLITTLE, DIRECTOR Proceedings of the Third Annual Northeastern Forest Insect Work Conference CONTENTS INTRODUCTION-Robert W. Campbell ........................... 1 TOWARD INTEGRATED CONTROL- D. L,Collifis ...............................................................................2 POPULATION QUALITY- 7 David E. Leonard ................................................................... VERTEBRATE PREDATORS- C. H. Backner ............................................................................2 1 INVERTEBRATE PREDATORS- R. I. Sailer ..................................................................................32 PATHOGENS-Gordon R. Stairs ...........................................45 PARASITES- W.J. Tamock and I. A. Muldrew .......................................................................... 59 INSECTICIDES-Carroll Williams and Patrick Shea .............................................................................. 88 INTEGRATED CONTROL, PEST MANAGEMENT, OR PROTECTIVE POPULATION MANAGEMENT- R. W. Stark ..............................................................................1 10 INTRODUCTION by ROBERT W. CAMPBELL, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Hamden, Connecticut. ANYPROGRAM of integrated control is likely to be much more expensive than complete reliance on pesticides in the short rzm, especially if we restrict our thinking to the cost of program development. Clearly, the use of pesticides was more appealing in the years before publication of The Silent Spring. Not only did our operational systems consist primarily of one- dimensional pesticidal applications, but little research effort was devoted to the development of supplemental or alternative methods. DDT seemed to be a miracle remedy; that was all one had to know or care about! Now a rising tide of public concern over possible adverse side effects of pesticides has resulted in increasing constraints on their use. And perhaps largely as a consequence of these con- straints we are now beginning to see increasing adverse effects from the pests themselves. In the face of this, it seems both re- markable and tragic that we have yet to really face up to the increasingly urgent need to produce supplemental or alternative population-management systems. Where do we go from here? First, we have to recognize that broad, flexible, and ecologically sound programs will not only cost a lot of money to develop but also that this development will take time. We then have to get this message across to a public that invariably wants action programs now! Second, we will have to plan ahead as carefully as possible. Scattered and uncoordinated research and control work usually result in find- ings that cannot be combined efficiently a posteriori to contrib- ute to problem solution. Our efforts will have to be coordinated more closely in the future than they have been in the past. TOWARD INTEGRATED CONTROL by D. L. COLLINS &L" LL wad I HAVE a suspicion that the word "integrated" is one of the most overworked and misused terms in common circulation today, including its use when coupled with the word "control" with reference to insect pests. Therefore, before devoting an entire conference to the subject of "integrated control", we might do well to see if we know what it really means. The word "integrated" is derived from the Latin adjective t,.integer", which originally meant "untouched or "entire". When converted into a verb and then, with the past tense used as an adjective again-that is, the word "integratedo-its mean- ing according to Webster is: "composed of separate parts united together to form a more complete, harmonious, or coordinated entity". For the word control we find several meanings, ranging from "power or authority to guide or manage" to "reduction or regu- lation of the wildlife population of an area by killing". Presum- ably the latter meaning conforms most closely to the interpreta- tion commonly understood in the expression "integrated control". If we substitute these definitions for the words we are de- fining, we come up with "reduction or regulation of the wildlife population of an area by killing (by use of) several separate parts united together to form a more complete, harmonious, or coordinated entity". Or, if we start fresh with the meaning of the word "integer", we would guess that integrated control would mean "complete control"-although this is not the way we usually understand it. Thus we see that the common entomological meaning and the actual etymological meaning of the term are somewhat at variance. In spite of this semantic confusion, or perhaps even because of it, the expression "integrated control" has certainly caught on with the public as well as with entomologists. How- ever, its ambiguity allows it to mean different things to differ- ent people, and therein lies a difficulty and danger. To a person confronted with an urgent pest problem, it is rather risky to recommend "integrated control", especially if you have to stay around and explain what you mean by it in terms of positive action to solve a particular problem. Yet, if we are to continue to use the expression, we must be prepared to accompany it with pertinent, useful advice. Otherwise the term becomes a fatuous subterfuge for avoiding the issue. Possibilities Historically, in forest entomology, or rather, in the control of forest insect pests, before the recent era of reliance on pesticides, the approach was basically one which we would now call "integrated". Such well-known and widely re- spected forest entomologists as S. A. Graham were empha- sizing the suppression or regulation of forest pests by atten- tion to certain biological facts and various cultural practices long before the term "integrated" began to be thrown around so loosely. Graham always emphasized means of control other than chemical, and I think we might well re- turn to his early principles and precepts in an attempt to appraise the present situation. Until recently it was thought by many persons, or at least hoped, that a control of the gypsy moth, or a way to stop its spread, could be developed in time to keep it from over- running the southern and western Appalachian forests. Hence a belated, but intensive, almost desperate, effort to learn more about it, and to try anything that seemed to offer a chance of halting its advance. At about the same time that the program of total suppression and prevention of spread began to appear hopeless, the situation was further aggra- vated by the furore about insecticides. Research on other possible control methods, which had already been under way, suddenly acquired stronger support, and many new possibilities received attention. A serendipitous result of the intensive work on gypsy moth has been the development of information that can also be applied to other forest pests as well. A review of possible control methods for this insect would certainly include the following: Release of sterile males. Sex attractant pheromones. Genetic manipulation. Parasites. Invertebrate predators. Vertebrate predators. Pathogens. Feeding inhibitors. Environmental manipulation. Chemical pesticides. Each of these methods has found a place somewhere in the control program for one or more pests. We all know, for example, of the use of the sterile males released against the screwworm, the use of lady beetles against scale insects in California, the use of Bacillzu thuringiensis against cabbage loopers, and so on. Unfortunately, each individual instance of success depends on a special set of circumstances that may be difficult or im- possible to duplicate or approximate with some other species. This fact is often very difficult to get across to the public, who see this or that "new" technique as a breakthrough on old fronts. The sterile male technique, for example-or the use of specific pathogens and parasites-to be really workable may require that there be a practical way either to rear or to trap the insects in large numbers and to maintain continuous rearing or access to large natural populations. These procedures must be worked out separately for each species. They may include the development of artificial foods and extensive and expensive greenhouse and insectary facilities manned by many persons with special training and duties. Watchful Waiting The economic factor is an important one, and one that in for- est entomology problems is especially difficult to assess. The question "Is it worth the expense?" usually comes up even- tually; and then we get into the realm of opinions and emotions and long-range effect, which makes it virtually impossible to give satisfactory answers-at least not without extensive applied research. Even with proven, if limited, success for a given con- trol in a specific instance such as sterile males against screw- worm or fruit fly, or virus against sawflies, or milky disease against Japanese beetle, we are on the defensive with every would-be control agency, whether it is a commercial applicator, a property owner, a garden club, or a public agency, unless, after we have said he can't or shouldn't spray, we can tell him something else to do that is really practical: where to get it, how to use it, or who can do it, and what to expect
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Occurrences of Small Mammal Species in a Mixedgrass Prairie in Northwestern North Dakota
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln The Prairie Naturalist Great Plains Natural Science Society 6-2007 Occurrences of Small Mammal Species in a Mixedgrass Prairie in Northwestern North Dakota, Robert K. Murphy Richard A. Sweitzer John D. Albertson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tpn Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Systems Biology Commons, and the Weed Science Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Natural Science Society at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Prairie Naturalist by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. NOTES OCCURRENCES OF SMALL MAMMAL SPECIES IN A MIXED-GRASS PRAIRIE IN NORTHWESTERN NORTH DAKOTA -- Documentation is limited for many species of vertebrates in the northern Great Plains, particularly northwestern North Dakota (Bailey 1926, Hall 1981). Here we report relative abundances of small « 450 g) species of mammals that were captured incidental to surveys of amphibians and reptiles at Lostwood National Wildlife Refuge (LNWR) in northwestern North Dakota from 1985 to 1987 and 1999 to 2000. Our records include a modest range extension for one species. We also comment on relationships of small mammals on the refuge to vegetation changes associated with fire and grazing disturbances. LNWR encompassed 109 km2 of rolling to hilly moraine in Burke and Mountrail counties, North Dakota (48°37'N; 102°27'W). The area was mostly a native needlegrass-wheatgrass prairie (Stipa-Agropyron; Coupland 1950) inter­ spersed with numerous wetlands 'x = 40 basins/km2) and patches of quaking aspen trees (Populus tremuloides; x = 0.4 ha/patch and 4.8 patches/km2; 1985 data in Murphy 1993:23), with a semi-arid climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Andhra Pradesh
    PROFILES OF SELECTED NATIONAL PARKS AND SANCTUARIES OF INDIA JULY 2002 EDITED BY SHEKHAR SINGH ARPAN SHARMA INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NEW DELHI CONTENTS STATE NAME OF THE PA ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR CAMPBELL BAY NATIONAL PARK ISLANDS GALATHEA NATIONAL PARK MOUNT HARRIET NATIONAL PARK NORTH BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK MIDDLE BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK SOUTH BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK RANI JHANSI MARINE NATIONAL PARK WANDOOR MARINE NATIONAL PARK CUTHBERT BAY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY GALATHEA BAY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INGLIS OR EAST ISLAND SANCTUARY INTERVIEW ISLAND SANCTUARY LOHABARRACK OR SALTWATER CROCODILE SANCTUARY ANDHRA PRADESH ETURUNAGARAM SANCTUARY KAWAL WILDLIFE SANCTUARY KINNERSANI SANCTUARY NAGARJUNASAGAR-SRISAILAM TIGER RESERVE PAKHAL SANCTUARY PAPIKONDA SANCTUARY PRANHITA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ASSAM MANAS NATIONAL PARK GUJARAT BANSDA NATIONAL PARK PURNA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY HARYANA NAHAR SANCTUARY KALESAR SANCTUARY CHHICHHILA LAKE SANCTUARY ABUBSHEHAR SANCTUARY BIR BARA VAN JIND SANCTUARY BIR SHIKARGAH SANCTUARY HIMACHAL PRADESH PONG LAKE SANCTUARY RUPI BHABA SANCTUARY SANGLA SANCTUARY KERALA SILENT VALLEY NATIONAL PARK ARALAM SANCTUARY CHIMMONY SANCTUARY PARAMBIKULAM SANCTUARY PEECHI VAZHANI SANCTUARY THATTEKAD BIRD SANCTUARY WAYANAD WILDLIFE SANCTUARY MEGHALAYA BALPAKARAM NATIONAL PARK SIJU WILDLIFE SANCTUARY NOKREK NATIONAL PARK NONGKHYLLEM WILDLIFE SANCTUARY MIZORAM MURLEN NATIONAL PARK PHAWNGPUI (BLUE MOUNTAIN) NATIONAL 2 PARK DAMPA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY KHAWNGLUNG WILDLIFE SANCTUARY LENGTENG WILDLIFE SANCTUARY NGENGPUI WILDLIFE
    [Show full text]
  • Download Vol. 13, No. 4
    BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Volume 13 Number 4 THE MAMMAL FAUNA OF SCHULZE CAVE, F EDWARDS COUNTY, TEXAS Walter W. Dalquest, Edward Roth, and Frank Judd 354\ UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Gainesville 1969 Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM are pub- lished at irregular intervals. Volumes contain about 800 pages and are not necessarily completed in any one calendar year. WALTER AUF'FENBERG, Managing Editor OLIVER L. AUSTIN, JR., Editor Consultants for this isstie: THOMAS PATTON ELIZABETH WING Communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publication and all manuscripts should be addressed to the Managing Editor of the Bulletin, Florida State Museum, Seagle Building, Gainesville, Florida 32601. Published June 8, 1969 Price for this issue $.90 THE MAMMAL FAUNA OF SCHULZE CAVE, EDWARDS COUNTY, TEXAS WALTER W. DALQUEST, EDWARD ROTH, AND FRANK JUDD SYNOPSIS: Vertebrate remains from two levels in Schulze Cave, Edwards County, Texas, are analyzed. The younger materials probably date from ca. 5,000 B.P. to 8,800 B.P. The fauna is essentially modern, but the absence of the armadillo collared peccary, ringtail, and rock squirrel is thought to be significant. The older materials probably date from ca. 11,000 B.P. to 8;000 B.P. The mam- malian fauna of these Pleistocene sediments includes 62 species, of which 8 are extinct, 19 are not now regident on the Edwards Plateau, and 40 still live in the general area of the cave. Three species have not previously been reported from Pleistocene deposits in Texas: vagrant shrew, eastern chipmunk, and western jumping mouse.
    [Show full text]
  • INSECT DIVERSITY of BUKIT PITON FOREST RESERVE, SABAH
    Report INSECT DIVERSITY of BUKIT PITON FOREST RESERVE, SABAH 1 CONTENTS Page SUMMARY 3 1. STUDY AREA & PURPOSE OF STUDY 4 2. MATERIALS & METHODS 7 2.1 Location & GPS points 7 2.2 Assessment using Google Earth programme 7 2.3 Assessment by DIVA-GIS 8 2.4 Insect sampling methods 8 2.4.1 Light trap 8 2.4.2 Sweep net & manual collection 9 2.4.3 Insect specimens and identification 10 3. RESULTS & DISCUSSION 11 3.1 Overall insect diversity 11 3.1.1 Butterfly (Lepidoptera) 12 3.1.2 Moth (Lepidoptera) 12 3.1.3 Beetle (Coleoptera) 12 3.1.4 Dragonfly (Odonata) 12 3.1.5 Other insects 12 4. CONCLUSION 12 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 REFERENCES 14 PLATES Plate 1: Selected butterflies recorded from Bukit Piton F.R. 16 Plate 2. Selected moths recorded from Bukit Piton F.R. 17 Plate 3. Beetles recorded from Bukit Piton F.R. 18 Plate 4. Odonata recorded from Bukit Piton F.R. 19 Plate 5. Other insects recorded from Bukit Piton F.R. 20 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Tentative butterfly list from Bukit Piton F.R. 22 Appendix 2: Selected moths from Bukit Piton F.R. 22 Appendix 3: Tentative beetle list from Bukit Piton F.R. 24 Appendix 4: Tentative Odonata list from Bukit Piton F.R. 24 Appendix 5: Other insects recorded from Bukit Piton F.R. 25 Photo (content page): Wild Honeybee nest, Apis dorsata on Koompassia excelsa. 2 INSECT DIVERSITY OF BUKIT PITON FOREST RESERVE, SABAH Prepared for the District Forestry Office, Ulu Segama-Malua Forest Reserves Principal investigators: Arthur Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Short−Tailed Shrew (Blarina Brevicauda)
    FIELD GUIDE TO NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS Northern Short−tailed Shrew (Blarina brevicauda) ORDER: Insectivora FAMILY: Soricidae Blarina sp. − summer coat Credit: painting by Nancy Halliday from Kays and Wilson's Northern Short−tailed Shrews have poisonous saliva. This enables Mammals of North America, © Princeton University Press them to kill mice and larger prey and paralyze invertebrates such as (2002) snails and store them alive for later eating. The shrews have very limited vision, and rely on a kind of echolocation, a series of ultrasonic "clicks," to make their way around the tunnels and burrows they dig. They nest underground, lining their nests with vegetation and sometimes with fur. They do not hibernate. Their day is organized around highly active periods lasting about 4.5 minutes, followed by rest periods that last, on average, 24 minutes. Population densities can fluctuate greatly from year to year and even crash, requiring several years to recover. Winter mortality can be as high as 90 percent in some areas. Fossils of this species are known from the Pliocene, and fossils representing other, extinct species of the genus Blarina are even older. Also known as: Short−tailed Shrew, Mole Shrew Sexual Dimorphism: Males may be slightly larger than females. Length: Range: 118−139 mm Weight: Range: 18−30 g http://www.mnh.si.edu/mna 1 FIELD GUIDE TO NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS Least Shrew (Cryptotis parva) ORDER: Insectivora FAMILY: Soricidae Least Shrews have a repertoire of tiny calls, audible to human ears up to a distance of only 20 inches or so. Nests are of leaves or grasses in some hidden place, such as on the ground under a cabbage palm leaf or in brush.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D: Species Lists
    Appendix D: Species Lists Appendix D: Species Lists Mammal Species List for Rice Lake NWR ........................................................................................................ 81 Butterfly and Moth Species List, Rice Lake NWR ............................................................................................ 83 Dragonfly and Damselfly Species List, Rice Lake NWR ................................................................................... 86 Amphibian and Reptile Species List, Rice Lake NWR ...................................................................................... 90 Fish Species List, Rice Lake NWR and the Sandstone Unit of Rice Lake NWR ............................................... 91 Mollusk and Crustacean Species List, Rice Lake NWR and the Sandstone Unit of Rice Lake NWR .............. 92 Bird Species List, Rice Lake NWR ..................................................................................................................... 93 Sandstone Unit of Rice Lake NWR Bird Species List ..................................................................................... 103 Rice Lake NWR Tree and Shrub Species List ................................................................................................. 112 Vegetation Species List, Rice Lake NWR ....................................................................................................... 116 Rice Lake NWR and Mille Lacs NWR Comprehensive Conservation Plan 79 Appendix D: Species Lists Mammal Species List for Rice
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York
    CHECKLIST OF AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES, BIRDS AND MAMMALS OF NEW YORK STATE Including Their Legal Status Eastern Milk Snake Moose Blue-spotted Salamander Common Loon New York State Artwork by Jean Gawalt Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Page 1 of 30 February 2019 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Diversity Group 625 Broadway Albany, New York 12233-4754 This web version is based upon an original hard copy version of Checklist of the Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds and Mammals of New York, Including Their Protective Status which was first published in 1985 and revised and reprinted in 1987. This version has had substantial revision in content and form. First printing - 1985 Second printing (rev.) - 1987 Third revision - 2001 Fourth revision - 2003 Fifth revision - 2005 Sixth revision - December 2005 Seventh revision - November 2006 Eighth revision - September 2007 Ninth revision - April 2010 Tenth revision – February 2019 Page 2 of 30 Introduction The following list of amphibians (34 species), reptiles (38), birds (474) and mammals (93) indicates those vertebrate species believed to be part of the fauna of New York and the present legal status of these species in New York State. Common and scientific nomenclature is as according to: Crother (2008) for amphibians and reptiles; the American Ornithologists' Union (1983 and 2009) for birds; and Wilson and Reeder (2005) for mammals. Expected occurrence in New York State is based on: Conant and Collins (1991) for amphibians and reptiles; Levine (1998) and the New York State Ornithological Association (2009) for birds; and New York State Museum records for terrestrial mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Message: Jun 12, 2020
    Visit The University of Massachusetts Amherst Apply Give Search UMass.edu (/) Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources from UMass Extension and the Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment: ag.umass.edu/coronavirus (/coronavirus) LNUF Home (/landscape) About (/landscape/about) Newsletters & Updates (/landscape/newsletters-updates) Publications & Resources (/landscape/publications-resources) Services (/landscape/services) Education & Events (/landscape/upcoming-events) Make a Gift (https://securelb.imodules.com/s/1640/alumni/index.aspx?sid=1640&gid=2&pgid=443&cid=1121&dids=2540) Landscape Message: Jun 12, 2020 Jun 12, 2020 Issue: 9 UMass Extension's Landscape Message is an educational newsletter intended to inform and guide Massachusetts Green Industry professionals in the management of our collective landscape. Detailed (/landscape) reports from scouts and Extension specialists on growing conditions, pest activity, and cultural practices for the management of woody ornamentals, trees, and turf are regular features. The Search CAFE following issue has been updated to provide timely management information and the latest regional Search this site news and environmental data. Search UMass Extension has developed a listing of resources for commercial horticulture operations in Massachusetts to help keep you informed and aware of relevant policies and best practices for landscapers, turf managers, arborists, nurseries, garden centers, and Newsletters & greenhouse producers. Updates For our COVID-19 Information and Support for Landscapers, Nurseries, Turf Managers, Garden Centers, Arborists, and Greenhouse Operations in Massachusetts, go Landscape Message to https://ag.umass.edu/landscape/news/covid-19-information-support-for-landscapers- (/landscape/landscape-message) nurseries-turf-managers-garden-centers (/landscape/news/covid-19-information-support- Archived Landscape Messages (/landscape/landscape- for-landscapers-nurseries-turf-managers-garden-centers).
    [Show full text]
  • Belowground Herbivore Interactions
    ARTICLE Received 20 Apr 2014 | Accepted 30 Jul 2014 | Published 22 Sep 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5851 OPEN Species-specific defence responses facilitate conspecifics and inhibit heterospecifics in above–belowground herbivore interactions Wei Huang1, Evan Siemann2, Li Xiao1,3, Xuefang Yang1,3 & Jianqing Ding1 Conspecific and heterospecific aboveground and belowground herbivores often occur together in nature and their interactions may determine community structure. Here we show how aboveground adults and belowground larvae of the tallow tree specialist beetle Bikasha collaris and multiple heterospecific aboveground species interact to determine herbivore performance. Conspecific aboveground adults facilitate belowground larvae, but other aboveground damage inhibits larvae or has no effect. Belowground larvae increase con- specific adult feeding, but decrease heterospecific aboveground insect feeding and abun- dance. Chemical analyses and experiments with plant populations varying in phenolics show that all these positive and negative effects on insects are closely related to root and shoot tannin concentrations. Our results show that specific plant herbivore responses allow her- bivore facilitation and inhibition to co-occur, likely shaping diverse aboveground and below- ground communities. Considering species-specific responses of plants is critical for teasing apart inter- and intraspecific interactions in aboveground and belowground compartments. 1 Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China. 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA. 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.D. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:4851 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5851 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Für 1907. Karl Grünberg
    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Lepidoptera für li)07. Von Dr. K. Grünberg, Berlin. (Inhaltsverzeichnis am Schlüsse des Berichtes. A. Verzeichnis der Publikationen. Aclieu, C. Überwinterung der Puppen von Pteroz. proserpina. Ent. Zeitschr., Vol. 21, No. 33, p. 204. Adliin, Robert. Tortrix pronubana Hb., double-brooded in Britain. Entomologist, Vol. 40, p. 102. Aigner- Abaf i, L. v. (I). Über die Lepidopterenfauna Japans. Zeit- schr. f. wissensch. Insektenbiol., Vol. 3, p. 123—128. — {'Z). Massenhaftes Auftreten des Baumweißlings. 1. c., p. 189 u. 190. — (3). Magyarorszäg pillangoi. XVIII. Rovart Lapok., Vol. 14, p. 31—40, p. 66—71 (XIX), 109—176 (XX), 140—145 (XXI), 172 —176 (XXII), 192—199 (XXIH). — (4). Lepke-elteresek a Magyar Nemzeti Muzeum gyüjtemenyeböl. I. 1. c., p. 79—88, f. 1—11; IL p. 122—131, f. 12—22; III. p. 148 —153, f. 23; IV. p. 178—181; V. p. 210—212. — (5). Japänorszag lepke-fauna jarol. 1. c, p. 95—102. — (6). A magyar lepke-fauna gyarapodäsa 1906. ban. 1. c, p. 212—215. Aitken, E. H. The climatal changes of Melanitis leda. Journ. Soc. Nat. Hist. Bombay, Vol. 18, p. 195—197. Alplieraky, S. (I). Contribution ä la faune des Lepidopteres du caucase septentrional. (Supplements et corrections.) Rev. Russe d'Ent., Vol. 7, p. 203—205. — (3). Petits notices lepidopterologiques. 1. c, p. 266 u. 267. Andre, B. (1). Copiopteryx semiramis. Bull. Soc. Sei. Nat. Mäcon, Vol. 2, p. 277 u. 278. — {2). Actias sinensis. 1. c, p. 278 u. 279. .4urivilliiis, Clir. (I). Diagnosen neuer Lepidopteren aus Afrika.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Oomyzus Rondani (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) and First Record of O
    ZooKeys 950: 41–49 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.950.48795 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new species of Oomyzus Rondani (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) and first record of O. gallerucae (Fonscolombe) from China, with a key to Chinese species Wen-Jian Li1, Cheng-De Li1 1 School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, 150040, China Corresponding author: Cheng-De Li ([email protected]) Academic editor: T. Dörfel | Received 26 November 2019 | Accepted 17 May 2020 | Published 20 July 2020 http://zoobank.org/13E3811E-C178-4F9B-BEB7-3351295F4441 Citation: Li W-J, Li C-D (2020) A new species of Oomyzus Rondani (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae) and first record of O. gallerucae (Fonscolombe) from China, with a key to Chinese species. ZooKeys 950: 41–49. https://doi.org/10.3897/ zookeys.950.48795 Abstract Oomyzus flavotibialis sp. nov. is described from Liaoning and Shandong provinces, China. Oomyzus galleru- cae (Fonscolombe) is reported for the first time from China. A key to Chinese species ofOomyzus is provided. Keywords Chalcidoidea, new species, taxonomy, Tetrastichinae Introduction The genus Oomyzus currently contains 26 valid species worldwide (Noyes 2019), with only four species known from China: O. scaposus (Thomson), O. sokolowskii (Kurdju- mov), O. sinensis Sheng & Zhu, and O. hubeiensis Sheng & Zhu (Li 1984; Sheng and Zhu 1998; Wang et al. 1998). Most species of the genus are parasitoids of Coleoptera, Neuroptera, Diptera, and Lepidoptera. They attack larvae or pupae, and even eggs of their hosts, and several species were widely used in classical biological control (Yaseen 1978; Alam 1982; LaSalle 1994; Liu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OTTAWA NATURALIST Jeditoc: James M
    1907. VOL. XXI. 1907. THE OTTAWA NATURALIST, Being Vol. XXIII. of the TR AN S ACT IONS OF THE OTTAWA FIELD-NATURALISTS' CLUB. Organized March, 1879. Incorporated March, 1884. OTTAWA, CANADA: The Rolla L. Chain Co. Limited, Printers 1907 ^be ttawa ffielt)^1WaturaU0t0' Club, 1907^1908 patron: THE RIGHT HONOURABLE EARL GREY, GOVERNOR GENERAL OF CANADA. IpresiOent : W. J. Wilson, Ph.B. \Dtce=lPresiDent0: A. E. Attwood, M.A. A. Halkett. Xtbrartan : J. W. Baldwin. Secretary: treasurer: T. E. Clarke, B.A. Arthur Gibson, (470 O'Connor Street). (Central Experimental Farm). Committee Mr. A. H. Mr. J. M. Macoun Gallup. Miss L Ritchie. Rev. G. Eifrig. Mr. H. H. Pitts. Miss A. L. Matthews. Mr. E. E. Lemieux. Miss Q. Jackson. KuOitors: R. B. Whyte. F. T. Shutt. StanDing Committees of Council: H. G. W. Publishing: A. Gibson, J. M. Macoun, H. Pitts, Eifrig, J. Baldwin, Miss I. Ritchie. Excursions: A. Halkett, A. Gibson, G. Eifrig, E. E. Lemieux, T. E. Clarke, Miss A. L. Matthews, Miss Q. Jackson. E. E. Soirees: A. E. Attwood, H. H. Pitts, J. M. Macoun, A. H. Gallup, Lemieux, Miss A. L. Matthews. XeaOers: B. H. M. F. Geology: H. M. Ami, W. J. Wilson, D. Dowling, W. Collins, Connor. A. A. E. S. B. Botany: John Macotm, J. Fletcher, D. Campbell, Attwood, Sinclair, T. E. Clarke. C. H. W. Entomology: W. H. Harrington, J. Fletcher, A. Gibson, Young, J. Baldwin. S. E. O'Brien. Conchology: J. F. Whiteaves, F. R. Latchford, J. Fletcher, A. H. H. F. Ornithology: G. Eifrig, W. T. Macoun, A.
    [Show full text]