DOCSLIB.ORG

Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Alternative Submittal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Alternative Submittal MARTIS VALLEY GROUNDWATER BASIN SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT ACT ALTERNATIVE SUBMITTAL December 22, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS MARTIS VALLEY GROUNDWATER BASIN SGMA ALTERNATIVE SUBMITTAL ........................ 1 PART ONE: DESCRIPTION OF HYDROGEOLOGY OF MVGB ........................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION/OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................... 4 2. BASIN HYDROGEOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 4 2.1. Soils and Geology ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Groundwater Recharge and Discharge ......................................................................................... 9 2.3. Groundwater in Storage .............................................................................................................. 14 3. DESCRIPTION OF BENEFICIAL USES...................................................................................... 14 PART TWO: BASIN MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION AND PLAN ................................................ 15 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ......................................................................................................... 15 1.1. Summary of Management Approach, Organization of Partners, and General Conditions in the MVGB .................................................................................................................................................... 15 1.2. List of References and Technical Studies ................................................................................... 18 2. AGENCY INFORMATION Below is agency information for each of the six local SGMA agencies. .................................................................................................................................................. 18 2.1. Truckee Donner Public Utility District (TDPUD) ...................................................................... 18 2.2. Northstar Community Services District (NCSD) ........................................................................ 20 2.3. Placer County Water Agency (PCWA)....................................................................................... 22 2.4. Town of Truckee ......................................................................................................................... 24 2.5. Nevada County ............................................................................................................................ 26 2.6. Placer County .............................................................................................................................. 28 3. DESCRIPTON of MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................. 30 3.1. Description of Area ..................................................................................................................... 30 3.2. Management Area Groundwater Conditions .............................................................................. 30 4. WATER BUDGET ......................................................................................................................... 41 4.1. Summary of Components............................................................................................................ 41 4.2. Change in Annual Storage .......................................................................................................... 41 4.3. Estimated Sustainable Yield ....................................................................................................... 41 4.4. Projected Water Budget .............................................................................................................. 42 5. WATER RESOURCE MONITORING PROGRAMS ................................................................... 42 6. WATER RESOURCE MANGEMENT PROGRAMS ................................................................... 44 6.1. Landuse Elements Related to Basin Management ...................................................................... 44 6.2. Recycled Water Production ........................................................................................................ 47 6.3. Conjunctive Use Program ........................................................................................................... 47 7. NOTICE AND COMMUNICATION ............................................................................................ 47 7.1. Description of Groundwater Users ............................................................................................. 47 7.2. Public Participation ..................................................................................................................... 48 7.3. Communications Plan ................................................................................................................. 49 8. INTRODUCTION TO SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT APPROACH .................................... 49 9. MANAGING GROUNDWATER LEVELS .................................................................................. 50 9.1. Groundwater Level Conditions ................................................................................................... 50 9.2. Description of Management Programs ....................................................................................... 50 9.3. Summary of Chronic Water Level Decline Sustainable Management Criteria .......................... 50 10. MANAGING BASIN STORAGE .............................................................................................. 52 10.1. Basin Storage Conditions ........................................................................................................ 52 10.2. Description of Management Programs.................................................................................... 52 10.3. Summary of Reduction in Groundwater Storage Sustainable Management Criteria .............. 52 11. MANAGING BASIN WATER QUALITY................................................................................ 52 11.1. Basin Water Quality Conditions ............................................................................................. 52 11.2. Description of Management Programs.................................................................................... 53 11.3. Summary of Degraded Water Quality Sustainable Management Criteria .............................. 53 12. MANAGING SEAWATER INTRUSION ................................................................................. 53 13. MANAGING LAND SUBSIDENCE ......................................................................................... 53 13.1. Basin Land Subsidence Conditions ......................................................................................... 53 13.2. Description of Management Programs.................................................................................... 53 13.3. Summary of Land Subsidence Sustainable Management Criteria .......................................... 53 14. MANAGING GROUNDWATER DEPLETIONS IMPACTING SURFACE WATER ............ 54 14.1. Basin Groundwater Depletions Impacting Surface Water Conditions .................................... 54 14.2. Description of Management Programs.................................................................................... 54 14.3. Summary of Depletions Impacting Surface Water Management Criteria .............................. 54 15. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 56 PART THREE: APPENDICES .................................................................................................................. 56 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Martis Valley Groundwater Basin ................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2: Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Watershed .............................................................................. 6 Figure 3: Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Well Locations ...................................................................... 7 Figure 4: Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Geology ................................................................................. 8 Figure 5: Geological Stratigraphic Description ......................................................................................... 10 Figure 6: Cross Section A-A ...................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 7: Cross Section B-B ...................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 8: Cross Section C-C ...................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 9: MVGB Management Area ......................................................................................................... 16 Figure 10: MVGB Local SGMA Agencies Jurisdictional Boundaries ...................................................... 17 Figure 11: MVGB General and Community Plans .................................................................................... 31 Figure 12: MVGB Land Ownership .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bear Creek Watershed Assessment Report
    BEAR CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Prepared by: PO Box 8568 Truckee, California 96162 February 16, 2018 And Dr. Susan Lindstrom, PhD BEAR CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT – PLACER COUNTY – CALIFORNIA February 16, 2018 A REPORT PREPARED FOR: Truckee River Watershed Council PO Box 8568 Truckee, California 96161 (530) 550-8760 www.truckeeriverwc.org by Brian Hastings Balance Hydrologics Geomorphologist Matt Wacker HT Harvey and Associates Restoration Ecologist Reviewed by: David Shaw Balance Hydrologics Principal Hydrologist © 2018 Balance Hydrologics, Inc. Project Assignment: 217121 800 Bancroft Way, Suite 101 ~ Berkeley, California 94710-2251 ~ (510) 704-1000 ~ [email protected] Balance Hydrologics, Inc. i BEAR CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT – PLACER COUNTY – CALIFORNIA < This page intentionally left blank > ii Balance Hydrologics, Inc. BEAR CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT – PLACER COUNTY – CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project Goals and Objectives 1 1.2 Structure of This Report 4 1.3 Acknowledgments 4 1.4 Work Conducted 5 2 BACKGROUND 6 2.1 Truckee River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) 6 2.2 Water Resource Regulations Specific to Bear Creek 7 3 WATERSHED SETTING 9 3.1 Watershed Geology 13 3.1.1 Bedrock Geology and Structure 17 3.1.2 Glaciation 18 3.2 Hydrologic Soil Groups 19 3.3 Hydrology and Climate 24 3.3.1 Hydrology 24 3.3.2 Climate 24 3.3.3 Climate Variability: Wet and Dry Periods 24 3.3.4 Climate Change 33 3.4 Bear Creek Water Quality 33 3.4.1 Review of Available Water Quality Data 33 3.5 Sediment Transport 39 3.6 Biological Resources 40 3.6.1 Land Cover and Vegetation Communities 40 3.6.2 Invasive Species 53 3.6.3 Wildfire 53 3.6.4 General Wildlife 57 3.6.5 Special-Status Species 59 3.7 Disturbance History 74 3.7.1 Livestock Grazing 74 3.7.2 Logging 74 3.7.3 Roads and Ski Area Development 76 4 WATERSHED CONDITION 81 4.1 Stream, Riparian, and Meadow Corridor Assessment 81 Balance Hydrologics, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 LAHONTAN MOUNTAIN SUCKER Catostomus Lahontan (Rutter
    LAHONTAN MOUNTAIN SUCKER Catostomus lahontan (Rutter) Status: Moderate Concern. The Lahontan mountain sucker does not appear to be at risk of extinction in California in the near future; however, many populations are declining and their range is fragmented. Description: Mountain suckers are small (adults 12-20 cm TL), with subterminal mouths and full lips that are covered by many large papillae (Moyle 2002). Their lips are protrusible, have deep grooves where the upper and lower lips meet, and a cleft on the middle of the lower lip. The lower lip has two semicircular smooth areas along the inner margin next to a conspicuous cartilaginous plate that is used for scraping. The front of the upper lip is smooth. They have 75-92 scales along the lateral line and 23-37 gill rakers on the first gill arch. Fin rays typically number 10 (range 8-13) and nine for the dorsal and pelvic fins, respectively. An axillary process is easily visible at the base of the pelvic fins. Internally, their intestine is long (up to six times TL), and the lining of the abdominal cavity (peritoneum) is black. Their coloration is brown to olive green on the dorsal and lateral surfaces, white to yellow on their bellies, and dark brown in blotches in a lateral row or line. Mature males have two lateral bands, one red-orange on top of another that is black-green. Spawning males have tubercles covering their bodies and fins, with the exception of the dorsal fin. Tubercles on the enlarged anal fin become especially prominent. Spawning females also have tubercles but only on the top and sides of their heads and bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Martis Valley Groundwater Management Plan
    Martis Valley Groundwater Management Plan April, 2013 Free space Prepared for Northstar Community Services District Placer County Water Agency Truckee Donner Public Utility District Client Logo (optional) Northstar Community Services District Free space Martis Valley Groundwater Management Plan Prepared for Truckee Donner Public Utility District, Truckee, California Placer County Water Agency, Auburn, California Northstar Community Services District, Northstar, California April 18, 2013 140691 MARTIS VALLEY GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN NEVADA AND PLACER COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA SIGNATURE PAGE Signatures of principal personnel responsible for the development of the Martis Valley Groundwater Management Plan are exhibited below: ______________________________ Tina M. Bauer, P.G. #6893, CHG #962 Brown and Caldwell, Project Manager ______________________________ David Shaw, P.G. #8210 Balance Hydrologics, Inc., Project Geologist ______________________________ John Ayres, CHG #910 Brown and Caldwell, Hydrogeologist 10540 White Rock Road, Suite 180 Rancho Cordova, California 95670 This Groundwater Management Plan (GMP) was prepared by Brown and Caldwell under contract to the Placer County Water Agency, Truckee Donner Public Utility District and Northstar Community Services District. The key staff involved in the preparation of the GMP are listed below. Brown and Caldwell Tina M. Bauer, PG, CHg, Project Manager John Ayres, PG,CHg, Hydrogeologist and Public Outreach Brent Cain, Hydrogeologist and Principal Groundwater Modeler Paul Selsky, PE, Quality
    [Show full text]
  • Martis Wildlife Area Restoration Project
    Basis of Design – Martis Wildlife Area Restoration Project February 2018 Prepared for: Sierra Ecosystems Associates 2311 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, Suite 8 South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Truckee River Watershed Council P.O. Box 8568 1900 N. Northlake Way, Suite 211 Truckee, CA 96162 Seattle, WA 98103 SIERRA ECOSYSTEM ASSOCIATES/TRUCKEE RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL . MARTIS WILDLIFE AREA RESTORATION PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Project Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Geomorphic Condition ...................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Basin Characteristics & Hydrology ................................................................................................................... 3 4. Restoration Goals and Design .......................................................................................................................... 6 5. Hydraulic Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 13 6. References ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Martis Wildlife Area Restoration Project Area ...................................................................................... 1 Figure 2. Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the Martis Valley Groundwater Basin
    Annual Report for the Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Water Years 2018 and 2019 January 22, 2021 Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Annual Report Water Years 2018 and 2019 Prepared for: Truckee Donner Public Utility District (TDPUD) On behalf of Truckee Donner Public Utility District (TDPUD), Northstar Community Service District (NCSD), and Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) collectively referred to as the MVGB Agencies. Prepared by: GEI Consultants 2868 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95670 January 22, 2021 TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT MARTIS VALLEY GROUNDWATER BASIN ANNUAL REPORT WATER YEARS 2018 AND 2019 Certifications and Seals This report and analysis was prepared by the following GEI Consultants Inc. professional geologists. Report sections contained herein based on available data and were prepared by: ________________________________ Date: January 22, 2021 Sean Storey Geologist-In-Training No. 812 ________________________________ Date: January 22, 2021 Richard W. Shatz Principal Hydrogeologist California Certified Hydrogeologist C.H.G. No. 84 Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Annual Report GEI Consultants, Inc. Water Years 2018 and 2019 i Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Decade of Research in the Tahoe-Truckee Area And
    TAHOE REACH REVISITED: THE LATEST PLEISTOCENE/EARLY HOLOCENE IN THE TAHOE SIERRA SHARON A. WAECHTER FAR WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH GROUP DAVIS, CALIFORNIA WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY WILLIAM W. BLOOMER LITHIC ARTS MARKLEEVILLE, CALIFORNIA The last decade of research in the Tahoe-Truckee area and surrounding High Sierra has provided clear evidence of early Holocene and perhaps latest Pleistocene human activity, probably coming immediately on the heels of the Tioga glacial retreat. In this discussion we summarize this research, and compare environmental proxy data and obsidian hydration profiles from high-elevation sites in Sierra, Placer, Nevada, El Dorado, Alpine, and Washoe counties, to suggest “big-picture” trends in prehistoric use of the Tahoe Sierra. The title “Tahoe Reach Revisited” is in reference to work by Robert Elston, Jonathon Davis, and various of their colleagues along the Tahoe Reach of the Truckee River – that section of the river from Lake Tahoe to Martis Creek (Figure 1). In the 1970s these researchers did the first substantive archaeology in the Truckee Basin, and developed a cultural chronology that has stood for 30 years without significant revision – not, as I’m sure Elston would agree, because it was completely accurate, but because no one offered any meaningful alternative. Instead, archaeologists working in the Tahoe Sierra and environs – even as far away as the western foothills – simply compared their data to the Tahoe Reach model to date their sites: “Lots of big basalt tools? It must be Martis.” But this is not a paper about Martis. My focus instead is on a much earlier period, which Elston and his colleagues called the Tahoe Reach Phase.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Preliminary Draft Water Services in Eastern Nevada
    WATER SERVICES IN EASTERN NEVADA COUNTY MUNICIPAL SERVICES REVIEW Preliminary Draft FEATURING Truckee Donner PUD Donner Summit PUD Prepared for NEVADA LAFCO Public Workshop: May 16, 2019 East County Water - Preliminary DRAFT MSR Update [This page intentionally left blank] East County Water - Preliminary DRAFT MSR Update East County Water Services Draft 2nd Round Municipal Service Review Update TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT DONNER SUMMIT PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT Prepared for: Nevada LAFCo 950 Maidu Avenue Suite 270 Nevada City, CA 95959 https://www.mynevadacounty.com/907/Local-Agency-Formation- Commission-LAFCo Prepared by: Public Workshop: May 16, 2019 [This page intentionally left blank] East County Water - Preliminary DRAFT MSR Update Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS . .i Chapter 1: Executive Summary . 1-1 Chapter 2: Resolution . 2-1 Chapter 3: Introduction . .. 3-1 Chapter 4: Truckee Public Utility District . .. 4-1 Chapter 5: Donner Summit Public Utility District . 5-1 Chapter 6: Comments Received . 6-1 Chapter 7: References . .. 7-1 Chapter 8: Glossary . 8-1 Chapter 9: Acknowledgements . 9-1 APPENDICES 1. Demographic Report for the Town of Truckee 2. Demographic Report for Nevada County 3. Nevada County Economic Forecast by Caltrans 4. A Better Board Member by The Nevada County Grand Jury (an excerpt) 5. Description of the Truckee River Watershed 6. Other Water Users & Mutual Water Companies 7. Floriston 8. Water History from LAFCO’s 2005 MSR 9. Water Regulations 10. Groundwater Quality Report from USGS 11. EPA Drinking Water Standards 12. TROA Settlement 13. Water Conservation for TDPUD 14. Water Supply – Rough Calculations about the TDPUD 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Martis Valley Community Plan
    MARTIS VALLEY COMMUNITY PLAN Adopted by the Board of Supervisors December 16, 2003 MARTIS VALLEY COMMUNITY PLAN Prepared by: PLACER COUNTY WITH ASSISTANCE FROM: Pacific Municipal Consultants LSC Associates Placer County Water Agency Adopted by the Board of Supervisors December 16, 2003 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Board of Supervisors Bill Santucci ............................................................................................................................... District 1 Robert Weygandt ........................................................................................................................ District 2 Harriet White .............................................................................................................................. District 3 Ted Gaines ................................................................................................................................. District 4 Rex Bloomfield .......................................................................................................................... District 5 Contact: 175 Fulweiler Avenue, Auburn, CA 95603 (530) 889-4010 Fax (530) 889-4009 www.placer.ca.gov/bos ________________________________________________________________________________ Planning Commission Noe Fierros ................................................................................................................................. District 1 Ken Denio .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    North Lahontan Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Martis Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Martis Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 6-67 • County: Nevada, Placer • Surface Area: 35,600 acres (57 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology The Martis Valley Groundwater Basin is an intermontane, fault-bounded basin east of the Sierra Nevada crest. The Martis Valley is the principal topographic feature within the Basin, although the Basin extends to the north and west of the well-defined valley. The floor of Martis Valley is terraced with elevations between 5,700 and 5,900 feet above mean sea level. The valley is punctuated by round hills rising 1,000 feet or more around the valley perimeter. Mountains along the southern margin of Martis Valley rise dramatically to elevation in excess of 8,000 feet mean sea level. The basin boundaries are based on detailed field investigations developed by Hydro Search Inc. (1975). The Truckee River crosses the basin from south to east in a shallow, incised channel. Principal tributaries to the Truckee River are Donner Creek, Martis Creek, and Prosser Creek. Major surface water storage reservoirs include Donner Lake, Martis Creak Lake, and Prosser Creek Reservoir. Average precipitation is estimated to be 23 inches in the lower elevations of the eastern portion of the basin to nearly 40 inches in the western areas. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations The following summary of water bearing formations is from Nimbus Engineers (2001). Basement Rocks. Basement rocks include all rock units older than the basin- fill sediments and interlayered basin-fill volcanic units, specifically Cretaceous-Jurassic plutonic and metamorphic rocks and Miocene volcanic units.
    [Show full text]
  • Truckee Sanitary District, the Tahoe Truckee Sanitation Agency and the Donner Summit Public Utility District
    5.1 East County Wastewater MSR Preliminary Draft Local Agency Formation Commission of Nevada County 950 Maidu Avenue Nevada City, CA 95959 Phone 530-265-7180 or 888-846-7180 ... Fax 530-265-9862 Date: July 19, 2018 To: LAFCo Commissioners From: SR Jones, Executive Officer Subject: Commission Review of Preliminary Draft East County Wastewater Municipal Service Review Nevada LAFCo’s consultant SWALE, Inc., has prepared a draft of the East County Wastewater Municipal Service Review (MSR), and the Commission is now asked to provide direction to staff and the consultant to ready the draft for release to the public. The MSR reviews wastewater services as provided in eastern Nevada County. Service re- sponsibilities are handled by three separate agencies: the Truckee Sanitary District, the Tahoe Truckee Sanitation Agency and the Donner Summit Public Utility District. The Truckee Sanitary District and the Tahoe Truckee Sanitation Agency work in partnership as the former is responsible for sewer collection and conveyance while the latter handles treatment and disposal. The MSR process involves the Commission adopting written determinations on seven factors specified by statute: • Growth and Population Projections for the Affected Area • Location and Characteristics of any Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities • Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services • Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services • Status of and Opportunities for Shared Facilities • Accountability for Community Service Needs • Any Other Matter Related to Effective or Efficient Service Delivery The draft Municipal Service Review lists suggested written determinations and sphere boundary options for the Commission’s consideration for the Truckee Sanitary District, as Nevada LAFCo is the principal county LAFCo for the district and is therefore responsible for all sphere of influence actions for the agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
    Local Hazard Mitigation Plan for Nevada County 2011-2016 This plan incorporates the jurisdictions of Grass Valley, Nevada City, Truckee, California Department of Forestry, US Forest Service, and various special districts. 1. Table of Contents 2. Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Executive Overview ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 5. County Background Information ..................................................................................................................................... 6 5.1. County Profile ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 5.2. History of County .................................................................................................................................................... 7 5.3. Population, Income and Growth Trends ................................................................................................................. 7 5.4. History of Disasters ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • River and Reservoir Operations Model, Truckee River Basin, California and Nevada, 1998
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey River and Reservoir Operations Model, Truckee River Basin, California and Nevada, 1998 Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4017 Prepared in cooperation with the TRUCKEE–CARSON PROGRAM RIVER AND OPERATIONS MODEL, TRUCKEE RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA, 1998 River and Reservoir Operations Model, Truckee River Basin, California and Nevada, 1998 By Steven N. Berris, Glen W. Hess, and Larry R. Bohman U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4017 Prepared in cooperation with the TRUCKEE–CARSON PROGRAM Carson City, Nevada 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government For additional information contact: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 333 West Nye Lane, Room 203 Carson City, NV 89706–0866 email: [email protected] http://nevada.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Purpose and Scope ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]