Perfect Storm the Multiple Challenges Facing Public Service News, and Why Tackling Them Is Vital for Democracy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Contribution of Public Service Media in Promoting Social Cohesion
COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L’EUROPE Contribution of public service media in promoting social cohesion and integrating all communities and generations Implementation of Committee of Ministers Recommendation Rec (97) 21 on media and the promotion of a culture of tolerance Group of Specialists on Public Service Media in the Information Society (MC-S-PSM) H/Inf (2009) 5 Contribution of public service media in promoting social cohesion and integrating all communities and generations Implementation of Committee of Ministers’ Recommendation Rec (97) 21 on media and the promotion of a culture of tolerance Report prepared by the Group of Specialists on Public Service Media in the Information Society (MC-S-PSM), November 2008 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Council of Europe Strasbourg, June 2009 Édition française : La contribution des médias de service public à la promotion de la cohésion sociale et a l’intégration de toutes les communautés et générations Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex http://www.coe.int/ © Council of Europe 2009 Printed at the Council of Europe Contents Executive summary . .5 Introduction . .5 Key developments . .6 Workforce . 6 Requirements . .11 Content and services . 13 Conclusions, recommendations and proposals for further action . 18 Conclusions . .18 Recommendations and proposals for further action . .20 Appendix A. Recommendation No. R (97) 21 . 22 Recommendation No. R (97) 21 on Appendix to Recommendation No. R the media and the promotion of a (97) 21 . .22 culture of tolerance . .22 Appendix B. Questionnaire on public service media and the promotion of a culture of tolerance . -
Digibox & Ci+ Zendernummering
DIGIBOX & CI+ ZENDERNUMMERING NUMÉROTATION DES CHAÎNES Regio Brussel Région Bruxelles 105 VIJF HD Televisiezenders 106 Vitaya Chaînes de télévision 107 BRUZZ 1 La Une HD 108 KanaalZ 2 La Deux HD 109 CAZ 3 RTL Tvi HD 110 Play Time HD 4 Club TRL HD 111 Nat Geo HD 5 Plug RTL 112 Ketnet 6 TF1 HD 113 Discovery Vl HD 8 AB3 114 Fox 10 BX1 115 Njam! 12 R. Contact Vision 116 Plattelands TV 15 La Trois 118 BBC Entertainment 30 Arte Belgique 120 Cadet 31 TV5 Monde 121 Nickelodeon/Spike HD 33 Sundance TV FR 122 Nick Jr. 41 France 3 123 Studio 100 TV 42 France 4 124 vtmKzoom 43 France 5 126 ZES HD 44 France Ô 127 Ment TV 60 France 2 130 Stories 100 vtm HD 131 MTV VL 101 één HD 133 Cartoon Network 102 VIER HD 134 Comedy Central 103 Canvas HD 135 Brava 104 Q2 HD 136 evenaar telenet.be/business V.U.: Telenet BVBA/E.R. : Telenet SPRL, Liersesteenweg 4, 2800 Mechelen/Malines – April/Avril 2017 DIGIBOX & CI+ ZENDERNUMMERING NUMÉROTATION DES CHAÎNES Regio Brussel Région Bruxelles 137 Viceland 312 Bloomberg 140 Xite 344 Animal Planet 142 Actua TV 620 Eurosport FR 145 Dobbit TV 621 Eurosport HD 201 2M Monde 622 Eurosport 2 HD 202 Al Maghreb TV 625 Extreme Sport 203 TRT Turk 210 Rai1 213 Mediaset Italia 214 TVE Play Sports (optioneel) 217 The Israëli Network Play Sports (optionelle) 220 BBC1 221 BBC2 610 Play Sports HD1 230 NPO 1 611 Play Sports HD2 231 NPO 2 612 Play Sports HD3 232 NPO 3 613 Play Sports HD4 241 ZDF 614 Play Sports HD5 299 Euronews FR 615 Play Sports HD6 301 Euronews 616 Play Sports HD7 303 CNN 617 Play Sports HD8 304 CNBC 618 Play Sports GOLF HD 305 BBC World 628 Eleven Sports 1 NL 306 Al Jazeera Eng. -
Czech Republic Represents 21,3 %
Questionnaire - Revision of the Communication from the Commission on the application of State aid rules to public service broadcasting 1. GENERAL 1.1. A number of significant legal developments have taken place in the public broadcasting area since 2001, namely the adoption of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, the adoption of the Decision and Framework on compensation payments as well as Commission decision-making practice. Do you think that the Broadcasting Communication should be up-dated in light of these developments? Alternatively, do you consider that these developments do not justify the adoption of a new text? There is no need for revision or change of the Communication at the moment. The Communication on the application of State aid rules to public service broadcasting (OJ 2001/C 320/4) lays down flexible principles which have made it possible to resolve a number of cases by taking due account of the specificity of the public service broadcasting sector. The Audiovisual Media Services Directive (OJ 2007/C 332/27) takes into account the emergence of new media and recalls the importance of the coexistence of public and private providers of audiovisual media services and the firm need for the public service broadcasting remit to continue to benefit from technological progress (Recital 9). Public service broadcasters consider that there is no particular pressing need to revise the current Communication. Any updating which may take place needs to ensure stability for public service broadcasters while maintaining the flexibility of the current system, a system which makes it possible to offer legal solutions to organizations of various sizes and operating on various markets which have a remit to offer public service output responding to the needs and choices of their respective societies. -
FCC-06-11A1.Pdf
Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 05-255 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: February 10, 2006 Released: March 3, 2006 Comment Date: April 3, 2006 Reply Comment Date: April 18, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, and Tate issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of this Report......................................................................................................................... 2 B. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2005 ................................................................................... 4 2. General Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Specific Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING ......... 27 A. Cable Television Service .............................................................................................................. -
Channel 4 - a Change of Ownership?
By John Woodhouse 15 September 2021 Channel 4 - a change of ownership? Summary 1 Background 2 Further reading commonslibrary.parliament.uk Number 9280 Channel 4 - a change of ownership? Contributing Authors Maria Lalic Image Credits Channel 4 building by Tom Morris. Licensed by CC BY-SA 3.0 Disclaimer The Commons Library does not intend the information in our research publications and briefings to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. We have published it to support the work of MPs. You should not rely upon it as legal or professional advice, or as a substitute for it. We do not accept any liability whatsoever for any errors, omissions or misstatements contained herein. You should consult a suitably qualified professional if you require specific advice or information. Read our briefing ‘Legal help: where to go and how to pay’ for further information about sources of legal advice and help. This information is provided subject to the conditions of the Open Parliament Licence. Feedback Every effort is made to ensure that the information contained in these publicly available briefings is correct at the time of publication. Readers should be aware however that briefings are not necessarily updated to reflect subsequent changes. If you have any comments on our briefings please email [email protected]. Please note that authors are not always able to engage in discussions with members of the public who express opinions about the content of our research, although we will carefully consider and correct any factual errors. You can read our feedback and complaints policy and our editorial policy at commonslibrary.parliament.uk. -
I INFORMING a DISTRACTED AUDIENCE: NEWS NARRATIVES
INFORMING A DISTRACTED AUDIENCE: NEWS NARRATIVES IN BREAKFAST TELEVISION Emma Copeman Submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Arts (MECO), Honours Department of Media and Communications October, 2007 i Abstract This thesis takes its lead from Baym‟s (2004) suggestion that incorporation of entertainment techniques into television news undermines its authority and credibility. To explore this question, textual analysis was conducted on the news bulletins of Australian breakfast television programs Sunrise and Today with regard to narrative features and the spread of traditional news conventions compared to entertainment techniques. This analysis was followed by a discussion of the dominant meanings produced by the news narratives of Sunrise and Today. The two programs employed similar narrative styles that largely adhered to traditional news conventions, positioning themselves as impartial and authoritative relayers of news. However, narratives of both programs also diverged from traditional news: both used entertainment conventions – with Today often abandoning the traditional Inverted Pyramid news story structure for new structures – and contained briefer stories, with references to the opinions and personal experiences of the item presenters. In some breakfast news items, the short and sometimes personal narrative structure diminished the construction of impartiality. While entertainment techniques represented a potential threat to the overall authority of the news, in this analysis, the threat was mitigated by the dominance of traditional news conventions and authority was retained. In summary, departures from traditional news narrative structure and delivery are evident in Australian breakfast television, and may partly decrease its news authority and impartiality. However, the ability of these programs to retain distracted breakfast audiences may depend on the brief, entertaining and sometimes personal nature of the news items. -
Market Performances Barometer Status June 2015
Market Performances Barometer Status June 2015 Confidential : strictly for Space clients GROSS MEDIA INVESTMENTS EVOLUTION 2 Source: MDB National North South € Mo 1,472.6 894.2 578.4 % Region 100% 61% 39% vs YTD 2014 - 3.5% - 3.2% - 3.9% Media (vs YTD 2014) Ecogroups (vs YTD 2014) 9% 3% 7% House Eq. (+ 8%) 41% Beauty (+ 7%) OOH (+ 4%) House Cl. (+ 5%) TV (+ 3%) Transport (+ 5%) 21% Clothing (+ 2%) 6% 1% 14% Radio (- 5%) Food (- 2%) Magazines (- 7%) Health (- 3%) Retail (- 3%) Dailies (- 10%) TV Radio Energy (- 6%) Cinema Internet Internet (- 10%) Services (- 14%) Dailies Mag. Cinema (- 16%) Telecom (- 20%) Free Press (- 24%) Free Press OOH Petfood (- 27%) KEY TV FIGURES 4 Variable Channel Daypart YTD-12 YTD-13 YTD-14 YTD-15 15 vs 14 Rating (%) TSU (Total Screen Usage) (1) 17-23:00 26.9% 28.9% 29.6% 29.4% 99 Total channels (Live + TSV) " 91.1% 90.5% 89.8% 87.7% 98 VHS + DVD player + Blue Ray " 2.3% 2.1% 2.7% 3.7% 139 Audience share TSU (%) (2) Video on demand + Digital recorder " 5.0% 6.1% 6.4% 7.6% 119 Game console and other devices (3) " 1.6% 1.3% 1.2% 1.0% 82 All Channels " 8.0% 9.7% 10.3% 12.2% 118 % Time shift viewing (4) Main Channels (5) " 10.4% 12.1% 13.6% 14.9% 110 Commercial breaks rating vs Main channels (5) - Live " 86 86 87 88 Full daypart rating Main channels (5) - TSV " 24 26 25 26 All TV channels (Live) Total day 129 137 136 130 96 ATV All TV channels (TSV) " 9 12 13 15 115 (Average daily viewing time) All TV channels (Live + TSV) " 138 148 149 145 98 in minutes Other TV Screen Usage " 18 21 22 28 125 Total TV Screen Usage -
Brochure SFFS 2018
BELGIUM - WALLONIA SUMMER FANCY FOOD SHOW 2018 New York, 30 June - 02 July 2018 Jacob Javits Convention Center Hall 3 Booths : 2105 - 2121 WALLONIA EXPORT-INVESTMENT AGENCY (AWEX) Place Sainctelette 2 B-1080 Brussels BELGIUM +32-2-421 82 11 [email protected] www.awex-export.be www.wallonia.be www.wallonia-international.be AWEX, partner of the international economic development of Wallonia. The Wallonia Export-Investment Agency (AWEX) is in charge of the development and management of Wallonia's international economic relations. With regards to foreign trade, the Agency has a promotion and information mission with regard to both the international and Walloon business community. Intended for purchasers, decision-makers, importers and foreign prospects, the Agency can, on request: • pass on economic data regarding Wallonia and its export potential; • provide information on the products and services of Walloon businesses; • seek Walloon businesses for the conclusion of international partnerships; • distribute lists of Walloon exporters. Vis-a-vis Walloon businesses, the Agency is their comprehensive international partner, providing a range of services and activities covering the entire export process: • General and commercial information on foreign markets; • Production of individual market studies on request; • Organisation of commercial canvassing operations (participation in international shows, organisation of economic missions, sector-based contact days, etc.); • Contacts with international organisations; • Promotion of Wallonia and its export potential; • Financial support and funding for exports; • Training and raising awareness of international professions. With regards to foreign investment, the Agency provides general expertise in the areas of promotion, prospecting and informing potential investors. It also ensures active monitoring of investors based in Wallonia, as well a mission to find foreign buyers for Walloon industrial sites in the process of restructuring. -
Nordic Drama
NORDIC DRAMA PUBLIC SERVICE ORIGINALS A stronger Nordic public service drama collaboration The Nordic public service media companies DR, NRK, RUV, SVT and Yle have in recent years been renowned for outstanding Nordic drama productions. High quality drama with a clear local anchoring and strong public service ambitions has become one of our distinguishing trademarks. To ensure that strong, local drama remains a trademark of the Nordic public service broadcasters in a digital world, the Nordvision partners have decided to build a stronger public service drama portfolio. A strengthening that will increase both the volume of Nordic drama that each company have available on their “players” as well as the quality of the publishing right the partners secure for each other. A clear focus on drama that reflects a Nordic culture, reality and identity fits naturally with the public service mission, and it provides a genuine and recognizable promise to the users that sets Nordic public service apart from other content providers. The initiative is called “Nordic Twelve” (N12). What is N12? N12 – is a yearly package of 12 Nordic drama series with 12 month of rights in the Nordic region. In the following you can find all the N12 drama series: N12 - 2018, N12 - 2019, and some drama series from N12 - 2020. The Nordic partners also co-produce between 8 and 10 young adult drama series a year. For more information see www.nordvision.org 4 N12 2018 8 LIBERTY / DR 10 RIDE UPON THE STORM 2 / DR 12 HOME GROUND 1 / NRK 14 MANNERS / RUV 16 SISTERS 1968 / SVT 18 THE DAYS THE FLOWERS BLOOM / SVT 20 BONUS FAMILY 3 / SVT 22 BLIND DONNA / YLE 24 HOOKED 1 + 2 / YLE N12 2019 26 FOLLOW THE MONEY 3 / DR 28 DELIVER US / DR 30 TWIN / NRK 32 HOME GROUND 2 / NRK 34 EVERYTHING I DON´T REMEMBER / SVT 36 SWIPE RIGHT / SVT 38 INVISIBLE HEROES / YLE 40 THE PARADISE / YLE N12 2020 42 A FAMILY MATTER / DR 44 22. -
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media. -
European Public Service Broadcasting Online
UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI, COMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH CENTRE (CRC) European Public Service Broadcasting Online Services and Regulation JockumHildén,M.Soc.Sci. 30November2013 ThisstudyiscommissionedbytheFinnishBroadcastingCompanyǡYle.Theresearch wascarriedoutfromAugusttoNovember2013. Table of Contents PublicServiceBroadcasters.......................................................................................1 ListofAbbreviations.....................................................................................................3 Foreword..........................................................................................................................4 Executivesummary.......................................................................................................5 ͳIntroduction...............................................................................................................11 ʹPre-evaluationofnewservices.............................................................................15 2.1TheCommission’sexantetest...................................................................................16 2.2Legalbasisofthepublicvaluetest...........................................................................18 2.3Institutionalresponsibility.........................................................................................24 2.4Themarketimpactassessment.................................................................................31 2.5Thequestionofnewservices.....................................................................................36 -
Crossing the Line Between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists' Use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen
www.ssoar.info Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Jukes, S. (2019). Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter. Media and Communication, 7(1), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183–2439) 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 248–258 DOI: 10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Article Crossing the Line between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists’ Use of Twitter Stephen Jukes Faculty of Media and Communication, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 7 September 2018 | Accepted: 4 January 2018 | Published: 21 March 2019 Abstract Anglo-American journalism has typically drawn a firm dividing line between those who report the news and those who run the business of news. This boundary, often referred to in the West as a ‘Chinese Wall’, is designed to uphold the inde- pendence of journalists from commercial interests or the whims of news proprietors. But does this separation still exist in today’s age of social media and at a time when news revenues are under unprecedented pressure? This article focuses on Twitter, now a widely used tool in the newsroom, analysing the Twitter output of 10 UK political correspondents during the busy party conference season.