University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting Template GREENHOUSE ACCLIMATIZATION AND FIELD ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ENDANGERED GHOST ORCHID, DENDROPHYLAX LINDENII By JAMESON COOPMAN A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Jameson Coopman To my family, who has been a solid foundation for my ambition To my advisor, Michael Kane, for mentoring me in many ways To Owen Haugen, whose friendship and support kept me going ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge all of my committee members, Dr. Rebecca Darnell, Dr. Hector Perez, Dr. Larry Zettler, and my advisor Dr. Michael Kane for their assistance and input throughout this adventure. I would like to thank Dr. Larry Zettler for the use of his fungal mycobionts for experimentation. I thank Larry Richardson for his help with the out-planting experiments and for providing some amazing photos. I would also like to express gratitude to Mark Danaher, the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge, and all those who work there for allowing me to conduct my field research there. Components of this research were originally supported by funding from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service under contract F12AC01245. I would like to acknowledge my peers, Ben Hughes, Paulina Quijia, Candice Prince, and Hoang Nguyen for being sounding boards for ideas and questions. Additionally, I thank Pandora, YouTube, Netflix, and Spotify for keeping me productive when I needed to be. I especially thank Calvin Harris and Jessie Reyez for “Hard to Love”, which I listened to on repeat for a week straight writing this thesis. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 8 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 9 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................... 12 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................... 15 Orchidaceae ........................................................................................................... 15 Orchid Mycorrhizae ................................................................................................. 18 Orchid Conservation ............................................................................................... 21 Plant of Study: Dendrophylax lindenii ..................................................................... 24 Project Objectives ................................................................................................... 32 2 GREENHOUSE ACCLIMATIZATION PROTOCOLS FOR FIELD ESTABLISHMENT OF IN VITRO-DERIVED DENDROPHYLAX LINDENII PLANTS .................................................................................................................. 33 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 33 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 36 Plant Material Source and Maintenance ........................................................... 36 Greenhouse Acclimatization ............................................................................. 37 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................ 39 Results and Discussion........................................................................................... 40 3 EFFECT OF ROOT PRUNING AND GENERATION OF NEW ACTIVE ROOTS ON GREENHOUSE ACCLIMATIZATION AND ROOT ATTACHMENT OF D. LINDENII ................................................................................................................. 53 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 53 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 56 Plant Material Source and Culture Maintenance .............................................. 56 Root Pruning .................................................................................................... 57 Effects of Pruning on Root Attachment ............................................................ 58 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................ 59 Results .................................................................................................................... 59 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 60 5 4 IN VITRO DESICCATION TOLERANCE OF THE EPIPHYTIC ORCHID DENDROPHYLAX LINDENII .................................................................................. 71 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 71 Materials and Methods............................................................................................ 74 Plant Material Preparation ................................................................................ 74 Desiccation Study ............................................................................................. 75 Relative Water Content .................................................................................... 77 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................ 78 Results .................................................................................................................... 78 Plant Survival ................................................................................................... 78 Plant Fresh Mass ............................................................................................. 79 Tissue Water Status ......................................................................................... 79 Root Number .................................................................................................... 80 Active Root Tip Number ................................................................................... 80 Total Plant Root Length .................................................................................... 81 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 81 5 THE EFFECT OF GREENHOUSE ACCLIMATIZATION AND ATTACHMENT MATERIAL ON THE OUT-PLANTING PERFORMANCE OF DENDROPHYLAX LINDENII ................................................................................................................. 97 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 97 Materials and Methods.......................................................................................... 100 Plant Material ................................................................................................. 100 Preparation Methods for Direct Out-planting vs Greenhouse Acclimatization 101 Comparative Performance of Out-planting Methods ...................................... 102 Statistical Analysis .......................................................................................... 103 Results .................................................................................................................. 103 Survival........................................................................................................... 103 Root Number and Attachment ........................................................................ 104 Active Root Tip Number ................................................................................. 105 Total Plant Root Length .................................................................................. 105 Discussion ............................................................................................................ 106 6 EFFECT OF MYCOBIONT INOCULATION ON THE GREENHOUSE ACCLIMATIZATION AND FIELD ESTABLISHMENT OF DENDROPHYLAX LINDENII ............................................................................................................... 126 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 126 Materials and Methods.......................................................................................... 128 Plant Material ................................................................................................. 128 Mycobiont Isolates .......................................................................................... 129 In Vitro Mycobiont/Plant Co-culture for Symbiotic Greenhouse Acclimatization ............................................................................................ 130 Symbiotic Greenhouse Acclimatization .......................................................... 130 Peloton Verification ........................................................................................ 131 6 In Vitro Mycobiont/Plant Co-culture for
Recommended publications
  • Approved Plant List 10/04/12
    FLORIDA The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today. City of Sunrise Approved Plant List 10/04/12 Appendix A 10/4/12 APPROVED PLANT LIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SG xx Slow Growing “xx” = minimum height in Small Mature tree height of less than 20 feet at time of planting feet OH Trees adjacent to overhead power lines Medium Mature tree height of between 21 – 40 feet U Trees within Utility Easements Large Mature tree height greater than 41 N Not acceptable for use as a replacement feet * Native Florida Species Varies Mature tree height depends on variety Mature size information based on Betrock’s Florida Landscape Plants Published 2001 GROUP “A” TREES Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Avocado Persea Americana L Bahama Strongbark Bourreria orata * U, SG 6 S Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum * L Black Olive Shady Bucida buceras ‘Shady Lady’ L Lady Black Olive Bucida buceras L Brazil Beautyleaf Calophyllum brasiliense L Blolly Guapira discolor* M Bridalveil Tree Caesalpinia granadillo M Bulnesia Bulnesia arboria M Cinnecord Acacia choriophylla * U, SG 6 S Group ‘A’ Plant List for Single Family Homes Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Citrus: Lemon, Citrus spp. OH S (except orange, Lime ect. Grapefruit) Citrus: Grapefruit Citrus paradisi M Trees Copperpod Peltophorum pterocarpum L Fiddlewood Citharexylum fruticosum * U, SG 8 S Floss Silk Tree Chorisia speciosa L Golden – Shower Cassia fistula L Green Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus * L Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba * L
    [Show full text]
  • Annona Glabra Global Invasive Species Database (GISD)
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Annona glabra Annona glabra System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Plantae Magnoliophyta Magnoliopsida Magnoliales Annonaceae Common name kaitambu (English, Fiji), kaitambo (English, Fiji), uto ni bulumakau (English, Fiji), uto ni mbulumakau (English, Fiji), corossolier des marais (English, French), annone des marais (English, French), bullock's heart (English), alligator apple (English), pond apple (English), cherimoyer (English) Synonym Similar species Summary Annona glabra is a highly invasive woody weed that threatens wetland and riparian ecosystems of wet tropics, world heritage areas and beyond. It can establish as a dense understorey that suppresses other growth leading to monocultures. view this species on IUCN Red List Species Description “Tree (2-) 3-8 (-12)m high, the trunk narrowly buttressed at the base; leaves oblong-elliptical, acute or shortly acuminate, 7-15cm long, up to 6cm broad; pedicel curved, expanded distally; sepals 4.5mm long, 9mm broad, apiculate; outer petals valvate, ovate-cordate, cream-coloured with a crimson spot at base within, 2.5-3cm long, 2-2.5cm broad; inner petals subimbricate, shortly clawed, 2-2.5cm long, 1.5-1.7cm broad, whitish outside, dark crimson within; stigmas sticky, deciduous; fruit up to 12cm long, 8cm broad, yellow outside when ripe, pulp pinkish- orange, rather dry, pungent-aromatic; seeds light brown, 1.5cm long, 1cm broad.” (Adams, 1972. In PIER, 2003) Notes Naturalised and sometimes exhibiting invasive behaviour in French Polynesia, (PIER, 2003). In Australia excessive drainage of surrounding areas for land reclamation raises the saline water table level sufficient to kill melaleuca trees thus allowing invasion by the salt tolerant pond apple, (Land Protection, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Actes Du 15E Colloque Sur Les Orchidées De La Société Française D’Orchidophilie
    Cah. Soc. Fr. Orch., n° 7 (2010) – Actes 15e colloque de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, Montpellier Actes du 15e colloque sur les Orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie du 30 mai au 1er juin 2009 Montpellier, Le Corum Comité d’organisation : Daniel Prat, Francis Dabonneville, Philippe Feldmann, Michel Nicole, Aline Raynal-Roques, Marc-Andre Selosse, Bertrand Schatz Coordinateurs des Actes Daniel Prat & Bertrand Schatz Affiche du Colloque : Conception : Francis Dabonneville Photographies de Francis Dabonneville & Bertrand Schatz Cahiers de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, N° 7, Actes du 15e Colloque sur les orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie. ISSN 0750-0386 © SFO, Paris, 2010 Certificat d’inscription à la commission paritaire N° 55828 ISBN 978-2-905734-17-4 Actes du 15e colloque sur les Orchidées de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, D. Prat et B. Schatz, Coordinateurs, SFO, Paris, 2010, 236 p. Société Française d’Orchidophilie 17 Quai de la Seine, 75019 Paris Cah. Soc. Fr. Orch., n° 7 (2010) – Actes 15e colloque de la Société Française d’Orchidophilie, Montpellier Préface Ce 15e colloque marque le 40e anniversaire de notre société, celle-ci ayant vu le jour en 1969. Notre dernier colloque se tenait il y a 10 ans à Paris en 1999, 10 ans c’est long, 10 ans c’est très loin. Il fallait que la SFO renoue avec cette traditionnelle organisation de colloques, manifestation qui a contribué à lui accorder la place prépondérante qu’elle occupe au sein des orchidophiles français et de la communauté scientifique. C’est chose faite aujourd’hui. Nombreux sont les thèmes qui font l’objet de communications par des intervenants dont les compétences dans le domaine de l’orchidologie ne sont plus à prouver.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Island Ridge Management Plan
    Pine Island Ridge Conservation Management Plan Broward County Parks and Recreation May 2020 Update of 1999 Management Plan Table of Contents A. General Information ..............................................................................................................3 B. Natural and Cultural Resources ...........................................................................................8 C. Use of the Property ..............................................................................................................13 D. Management Activities ........................................................................................................18 E. Works Cited ..........................................................................................................................29 List of Tables Table 1. Management Goals…………………………………………………………………21 Table 2. Estimated Costs……………………………………………………………….........27 List of Attachments Appendix A. Pine Island Ridge Lease 4005……………………………………………... A-1 Appendix B. Property Deeds………….............................................................................. B-1 Appendix C. Pine Island Ridge Improvements………………………………………….. C-1 Appendix D. Conservation Lands within 10 miles of Pine Island Ridge Park………….. D-1 Appendix E. 1948 Aerial Photograph……………………………………………………. E-1 Appendix F. Development Agreement………………………………………………….. F-1 Appendix G. Plant Species Observed at Pine Island Ridge……………………………… G-1 Appendix H. Wildlife Species Observed at Pine Island Ridge ……... …………………. H-1 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • INVENTAIRE DES ORCHIDEES DE TALATAKELY PARC NATIONAL DE RANOMAFANA ETUDES MORPHOLOGIQUE ET MOLECULAIRE DE CINQ ESPECES DU GENRE Aerangis (Rchb.F.)
    UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Mémoire pour l’obtention du Diplôme d’Etudes Approfondies (D.E.A.) En Biologie et Ecologie Végétales OPTION : ECOLOGIE VEGETALE INVENTAIRE DES ORCHIDEES DE TALATAKELY PARC NATIONAL DE RANOMAFANA ETUDES MORPHOLOGIQUE ET MOLECULAIRE DE CINQ ESPECES DU GENRE Aerangis (Rchb.f.) Présenté par RANDRIANINDRINA Veloarivony Rence Aimée (Maître ès Sciences) Soutenu publiquement le, 31 Janvier 2008 Devant la Commission de jury composée de : Président : Pr. RAJERIARISON Charlotte Examinateurs : Dr. RABAKONANDRIANINA Elisabeth Dr. FALINIAINA Lucien Rapporteurs : Dr. RAKOUTH Bakolimalala Dr. EDWARD Louis Jr. 1 UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO FACULTE DES SCIENCES Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Mémoire pour l’obtention du Diplôme d’Etudes Approfondies (D.E.A.) En Biologie et Ecologie Végétales OPTION : ECOLOGIE VEGETALE INVENTAIRE DES ORCHIDEES DE TALATAKELY PARC NATIONAL DE RANOMAFANA ETUDES MORPHOLOGIQUE ET MOLECULAIRE DE CINQ ESPECES DU GENRE Aerangis (Rchb.f.) Présenté par RANDRIANINDRINA Veloarivony Rence Aimée (Maître ès Sciences) Soutenu publiquement le, 31 Janvier 2008 Devant la Commission de jury composée de : Président : Pr. Charlotte RAJERIARISON Examinateurs : Dr. Elisabeth RABAKONANDRIANINA Dr Lucien. FALINIAINA Rapporteurs : Dr. Bakolimalala RAKOUTH Dr. Louis Jr. EDWARD 2 REMERCIEMENTS En premier lieu, nous voudrions rendre gloire à Dieu pour sa bienveillance et sa bénédiction. Mené à terme ce mémoire, est le fruit de la collaboration entre
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Orchid Society Newsletter
    The Atlanta Affiliated with the American Orchid Orchid Society, the Orchid Digest Corporation and the Mid-America Orchid Congress. Society 2001 Recipient of the American Orchid Society’s Distinguished Affiliated Bulletin Societies Service Award Newsletter Editor: Danny Lentz Volume 47: Number 7 www.atlantaorchidsociety.org July 2006 JULY EVENTS The Meeting: 8:00 Monday, July 10 at Atlanta Botanical Garden Marv Ragan will speak on Encyclias Marv Ragan of MAJ Orchids in Jacksonville will give a presentation on Encyclias. He will be bringing plants to sell. Roy Harrow’s Auction Roy Harrow’s auction will be held on July 29. This is a great opportunity to sell or swap some of your extra plants. See page 4 for details. Neomoorea irrorata Inside This Issue Atlanta Orchid Society 2006 Officers…………………………………………..….…………… Page 2 Member Spotlight – Mikie Emerson………………………………………...……....………….. Page 2 Events Out and About………………Dates for your Calendar…………...……….…….……… Page 3 Minutes of the June Meeting ….…….…...……….………….…………..……………...….…. Page 3 Roy Harrow’s Auction……………………….………..………..……………………………... Page 4 The June Exhibition Table ……………………………….………..………..…………...……. Page 5 Recent Blooms at the Atlanta Botanical Garden……………………………………………….. Page 8 Collector’s Item : Aeranthes ramosa Rolfe……………….………….…………..………...…… Page 9 Recent Awards from the Atlanta Judging Center……….………………………………………. Page 10 All contents © Atlanta Orchid Society unless otherwise noted. Page 2 www.atlantaorchidsociety.org July 2006 THE ATLANTA ORCHID Member Spotlight I am pretty much "plain vanilla." I SOCIETY have been growing orchids since Officers 1995. After killing quite a few, I President - Richard Hallberg decided I needed help so I joined both 152 Sloan St. AtlOS and South Metro Orchid Roswell, GA 30075 Society and the AOS. I grew in a back 770-587-5827 bedroom for a while then I built a [email protected] small attached greenhouse mainly built Vice-President/Programs - Mark Reinke from recycled material.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants Tend Ghost Orchids: Patrolling of Dendrophylax Lindenii (Orchidaceae) by Crematogaster Ashmeadi in Florida
    Ants tend ghost orchids: patrolling of Dendrophylax lindenii (Orchidaceae) by Crematogaster ashmeadi in Florida Peter R. Houlihan1,5,*, Andrea Lucky2, Mike Owen3, and Thomas C. Emmel1,2,4,6 Abstract Myriad symbioses exist between insects and orchids, especially in tropical forests where the majority of species are epiphytic. Relationships be- tween ants and rare epiphytic orchids are underrepresented in the scientific literature. The natural history and ecological entomology of Florida’s endangered and epiphytic ghost orchid, Dendrophylax lindenii (Lindley) Bentham ex Rolfe (Orchidaceae), remain limited. Widely recognized for long-standing hypotheses concerning the species’ pollination ecology, that documentation recently overturned, other interactions between insects and ghost orchids are scarce. Here we describe the first associations between ants, Crematogaster ashmeadi Mayr (Hymenoptera: For- micidae), and D. lindenii. Ghost orchid roots provide facultative and opportunistic structures for arboreal ants to use in nesting. Furthermore, excrement from ant colonies within the root mass can increase nutrient availability in the orchid’s nutrient-poor substrate; the proximity of these ants permits patrolling to defend the plant and exert control over possible extra floral nectaries that require further inquiry. This study presents novel observations that expand the known insect associations with ghost orchids, elucidating the complex ecology of one of Florida’s rarest and most endangered species. Key Words: ants; arboreal; ecology; epiphyte; Everglades; Fakahatchee Resumen Existen incontables números de simbiosis entre insectos y orquídeas, especialmente en los bosques tropicales donde la mayoría de las especies son epífitas. Las relaciones entre las hormigas y las orquídeas epífitas más raras están subrepresentadas en la literatura científica.
    [Show full text]
  • Lankesteriana 1
    LANKESTERIANA 4(1): 47-56. 2004. NOTES ON THE CARIBBEAN ORCHID FLORA. V. NEW SPECIES, COMBINATIONS AND RECORDS JAMES D. ACKERMAN Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 23360 San Juan, PR 00931-3360, USA [email protected] ABSTRACT. Three species of Orchidaceae are described as new to science: a Telipogon and a Lankesterella from the Dominican Republic and an Encyclia from Cuba. Telipogon niri is based on material collected by Donald Dod from the Cordillera Central A rare species, T. niri was previously recognized as Stellilabium minutiflorum (Kraenzl.) Garay, a distinct species from Central America. The generic name has changed due to unequivocal molecular evidence offered by Norris Williams, and the specific epithet honors Dr. Mark Nir, an avid student of Caribbean orchids. Lankesterella glandula is also based on material collected by Dod from the Cordillera Central. Thus far known only from the type collection, it is the second representative of the genus in Hispaniola. Encyclia monteverdensis is described from 19th century Charles Wright collections from Monte Verde, Cuba. The combination, Dendrophylax filiformis (Sw.) Carlsward & Whitten, suffers as a later homonym and is replaced by the next available name in the new combination Dendrophylax mon- teverdi (Rchb. f.) Ackerman & Nir. Cyclopogon miradorensis Schltr. is reported for the island of Dominica; Cranichis ricartii Ackerman is noted for the island of Guadeloupe; Cranichis ovata Wickstr. and Psilochilus macrophyllus (Lindl.) Ames are noted for Montserrat; and Trinidad is another locality for C. ovata. In addi- tion, Eurystyles domingensis Dod and two Malaxis species are added to the Cuban flora: M.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Organic Compounds: Contents and Their Role in Improving Seed Germination and Protocorm Development in Orchids
    Hindawi International Journal of Agronomy Volume 2020, Article ID 2795108, 12 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2795108 Review Article Organic Compounds: Contents and Their Role in Improving Seed Germination and Protocorm Development in Orchids Edy Setiti Wida Utami and Sucipto Hariyanto Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia Correspondence should be addressed to Sucipto Hariyanto; [email protected] Received 26 January 2020; Revised 9 May 2020; Accepted 23 May 2020; Published 11 June 2020 Academic Editor: Isabel Marques Copyright © 2020 Edy Setiti Wida Utami and Sucipto Hariyanto. ,is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In nature, orchid seed germination is obligatory following infection by mycorrhizal fungi, which supplies the developing embryo with water, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals, causing the seeds to germinate relatively slowly and at a low germination rate. ,e nonsymbiotic germination of orchid seeds found in 1922 is applicable to in vitro propagation. ,e success of seed germination in vitro is influenced by supplementation with organic compounds. Here, we review the scientific literature in terms of the contents and role of organic supplements in promoting seed germination, protocorm development, and seedling growth in orchids. We systematically collected information from scientific literature databases including Scopus, Google Scholar, and ProQuest, as well as published books and conference proceedings. Various organic compounds, i.e., coconut water (CW), peptone (P), banana homogenate (BH), potato homogenate (PH), chitosan (CHT), tomato juice (TJ), and yeast extract (YE), can promote seed germination and growth and development of various orchids.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Floral Fragrances and Their Niche in Conservation
    Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 THE SCENT OF A GHOST Orchid Floral Fragrances and Their Niche in Conservation James J. Sadler WHAT IS FLORAL FRAGRANCE? It is the blend of chemicals emitted by a flower to attract pollinators. These chemicals sometimes cannot be detected by our nose. 1 Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 WHY STUDY FLORAL FRAGRANCE? Knowing the floral compounds may help improve measures to attract specific pollinators, increasing pollination and fruit-set to augment conservation. Chemical compounds can be introduced to increase pollinator density. FLORAL FRAGRANCE: BACKGROUND INFORMATION 90 plant families worldwide have been studied for floral fragrance, especially the Orchidaceae6 > 97% of orchid species remain unstudied7 Of all plants studied so far, the 5 most prevalent compounds are: limonene (71%), (E)-β-ocimene (71%), myrcene (70%), linalool (70%), and α-pinene (67%)6 2 Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 POSSIBLE POLLINATORS BEES Found to pollinate via mimicry POSSIBLE POLLINATORS WASPS Similar as bees 3 Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 POSSIBLE POLLINATORS FLIES Dracula spp. produce a smell similar to fungus where the eggs are laid POSSIBLE POLLINATORS MOTHS Usually white, large and fragrant at night 4 Florida Orchid Conservation Conference 2011 CASE STUDY The Ghost Orchid State Endangered1 Dendrophylax lindenii THE GHOST ORCHID Range: S Florida to Cuba Epiphyte of large cypress domes and hardwood hammocks Often affixed to pond apple or pop ash Leafless Flowers May-August 5 Florida
    [Show full text]
  • Platanthera Chapmanii: Culture, Population Augmentation, and Mycorrhizal Associations
    Platanthera chapmanii: culture, population augmentation, and mycorrhizal associations By Kirsten Poff, B.S. A Thesis In Plant and Soil Science Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved Dr. Jyotsna Sharma Chair of Committee Dr. Scott Longing Dr. John Zak Dr. Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August, 2016 © 2016, Kirsten Poff Texas Tech University, Kirsten Poff, August 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First I would like to thank my mentor and advisor, Dr. Jyotsna Sharma for all of her help and support. She has challenged and encouraged me throughout my program and the duration of this project. Thanks to her, I am light-years ahead of where I was two years ago. Texas Parks and Wildlife is also gratefully acknowledged for funding portions of this study. I also wish to express my gratitude to Dr. John Zak for his enthusiasm and for encouraging my love of microbes. I also gratefully thank Dr. Scott Longing for his advice, and constructive comments. I sincerely thank all three committee members for all the time and energy they have spent on me throughout the duration of my project. I gratefully acknowledge Dr. Jason Woodward for his encouragement and recommendations as well. I also acknowledge Dr. Cynthia McKenney and Mr. Russel Plowman for their support; I now have a passion for teaching, and a much better understanding of what it is like to teach college level courses. I want to also thank Mr. Robby Carlson for his time and technological assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphometrics of Selected Dendrobium Spp (Orchidaceae) In
    ISSN (Online): 2349 -1183; ISSN (Print): 2349 -9265 TROPICAL PLANT RESEARCH 7(1): 149–157, 2020 The Journal of the Society for Tropical Plant Research DOI: 10.22271/tpr.2020.v7.i1.020 Research article Morphometrics of selected Dendrobium spp. (Orchidaceae) in Sri Lanka P. M. H. Sandamali1, S. P. Senanayake2* and S. Rajapakse3, 1 1Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka 2Department of Plant and Molecular Biology, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka 3 Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka *Corresponding Author: [email protected] [Accepted: 29 March 2020] Abstract: Morphometric analyses of five species of Dendrobium (Orchidaceae) found in Sri Lanka; D. aphyllum, D. crumenatum, D. heterocarpum, D. nutans and D. panduratum were carried out to infer their phenetic relationships. Thirty-one morphological characters were considered; six vegetative and twenty-five floral, of which five were qualitative and twenty-six were quantitative characters. The data were subjected to Cluster Analysis (CA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Cluster analysis has produced two prominent clusters, D. aphyllum, D. nutans and D. panduratum as cluster 1 and D. crumenatum and D. heterocarpum as cluster 2. Both D. nutans and D. panduratum are producing small sized floral parts, compared to D. aphyllum hence exhibits close similarities in floral morphology which resulted in forming a cluster of most closely related species with least dissimilarity values. With respect to many characteristics, two species incluster 2, D. crumenatum and D. heterocarpum, are found to be similar except for the leaf thickness. Furthermore, PCA also in agreement with the relationships derived from the cluster analysis.
    [Show full text]