DOCSLIB.ORG

SNAKES Harmful & Harmless

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SNAKES Harmful & Harmless SNAKES Harmful & Harmless 9 Birch Place, Stoneville, Western Australia 6081 Ph (08) 9295 3007, Email [email protected] _____________________ ABN - 12 676 823 869 _____________________ Checklist of Australian snakes – current at August 2021 Total number of venomous snakes in Oz – 145 , comprising 6 rear-fanged, 105 front- fanged land snakes and 34 front-fanged sea snakes. These are in red. Total number of venomous snakes in WA – 88 , comprising 5 rear-fanged, 58 front- fanged land snakes and 25 front-fanged sea snakes. Total number of snakes in WA –128 , includes the above 88 , plus 28 blind snakes, 1 file snake, 2 solid-toothed colubrids and 9 pythons. Total number of snakes in Oz –214 , includes the above 145 , plus 46 blind snakes, 2 file snake, 5 solid-toothed colubrids and 15 pythons - currently only 15 pythons listed below, but Liasis barroni is genetically distinct from olivaceus , so will eventually be elevated. SERPENTES TYPHLOPIDAE ( 46 species, WA - 28 ) Anilios Gray, 1845 A. affinis (Boulenger, 1889) A. ammodytes (Montague, 1914) A. aspina Couper et al, 1998) A. australis Gray, 1845 A. bicolor (Peters, 1857) A. bituberculatus (Peters, 1863) A. broomi (Boulenger, 1898) A. centralis (Storr, 1984) A. chamodracaena (Ingram & Covacevich, 1993) A. diversus (Waite, 1894) A. endoterus (Waite, 1918) A. fosser Shea, 2015 A. ganei (Aplin, 1998) A. grypus (Waite, 1918) A. guentheri (Peters, 1865) A. hamatus (Storr, 1981) A. howi (Storr, 1983) A. insperatus Venchi, Wilson & Borsboom, 2015 A. kimberleyensis (Storr, 1981) A. leptosoma (Robb, 1972) A. leucoproctus (Boulenger, 1889) A. ligatus (Peters, 1879) A. longissimus (Aplin, 1998) A. margaretae (Storr, 1981) A. micromma (Storr, 1981) © 2020 Brian Bush, Snakes Harmful & Harmless A. minimus (Kinghorn, 1929) A. nema (Shea & Horner, 1996) A. nigrescens Gray, 1845 A. obtusifrons Ellis et al, 2017 A. pilbarensis (Aplin & Donnellan, 1993) A. pinguis (Waite, 1897) A. proximus (Waite, 1893) A. robertsi (Couper, et al. 1998) A. silvia (Ingram & Covacevich, 1993) A. systenos Ellis et al, 2017 A. splendidus (Aplin, 1998) A. torresianus (Boulenger, 1889) A. tovelli (Loveridge, 1945) A. troglodytes (Storr, 1981) A. unguirostris (Peters, 1867) A. waitii (Boulenger, 1895) A. wiedii (Peters, 1867) A. yampiensis (Storr, 1981) A. yirrikalae (Kinghorn, 1942) A. zonula Ellis, 2016 Indotyphlops Hedges et al, 2014 I. braminus (Daudin, 1803) BOIDAE ( 15 species, WA - 9 ) Antaresia Wells & Wellington, 1985 A. childreni (Gray, 1842) A. maculosa (Peters, 1873) A. perthensis (Stull, 1932) Aspidites Peters, 1876 A. melanocephalus (Krefft, 1864) A. ramsayi (Macleay, 1882) Leiopython Hubrecht, 1979 L. albertisii (Peters & Doria, 1878) Liasis Gray, 1842 L. mackloti (Duméril & Bibron, 1844) L. m. fuscus (Peters, 1873) L. olivaceus (Gray, 1842) L. o. barroni (Smith, 1981) L. o. olivaceus Morelia Gray, 1842 M. bredli (Gow, 1981) © 2020 Brian Bush, Snakes Harmful & Harmless M. carinata (Smith, 1981) M. imbricata (Smith, 1981) M. kinghorni (Stull, 1933) M. oenpelliensis (Gow, 1977) M. spilota (Lacépède, 1804) M. s. cheynei (Wells & Wellington, 1984) M. s. mcdowelli (Wells & Wellington, 1984) M. s. metcalfei (Wells & Wellington, 1984) M. s. spilota M. s. variegata (Gray, 1842) M. viridis (Schlegel, 1872) ACROCHORDIDAE ( 2 species, WA - 1 ) Acrochordus Hornstedt, 1787 A. arafurae (McDowell, 1979) A. granulatus (Schneider, 1799) COLUBRIDAE ( 11 species, WA - 7 ) (mildly venomous, rear-fanged species in red) Boiga Fitzinger, 1826 B. irregularis (Merrem, 1802) Cerberus Cuvier, 1829 C. australis (Gray, 1842) Dendrelaphis Boulenger, 1890 D. calligastra (Gunther, 1867) D. punctulata (Gray, 1826) Enhydris Sonnini & Latreille, 1802 E. polylepis (Fischer, 1886) Fordonia Gray, 1842 F. leucobalia (Schlegel, 1837) Myron Gray, 1849 M. resetari Murphy, 2011 M. richardsonii Gray, 1849 Stegonotus Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 S. cucullatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) S. parvus (Meyer, 1874) Tropidonophis Jan, 1863 T. mairii (Gray, 1841) T. m. mairii © 2020 Brian Bush, Snakes Harmful & Harmless ELAPIDAE ( 104 species, WA - 57 ) (all are front-fanged species) Subfamily Hydrophiinae Terrestrial Elapids Acanthophis Daudin, 1803 A. antarcticus (Shaw & Nodder, 1802) A. cryptamydros Maddock, Ellis, Doughty, Lawrence, Smith & Wuster, 2015 A. praelongus Ramsay, 1877 A. pyrrhus Boulenger, 1898 A. wellsi Hoser, 1998 Antairoserpens Wells & Wellington, 1984 A. albiceps (Boulenger, 1898) A. warro (De Vis, 1884) Austrelaps Worrell, 1963 A. labialis Rawlinson, 1991 A. ramsayi Rawlinson, 1991 A. superbus (Gunther, 1858) Brachyurophis Gunther, 1863 B. approximans (Glauert, 1954) B. australis (Krefft, 1864) B. fasciolatus (Gunther, 1872) B. f. fasciatus (Stirling & Zietz, 1893) B. f. fasciolatus B. incinctus (Storr, 1968) B. morrisi Horner, 1998 B. roperi (Kinghorn, 1931) B. semifasciatus (Gunther, 1863) Cacophis Gunther, 1863 C. churchilli Wells & Wellington, 1985 C. harriettae Krefft, 1869 C. krefftii Gunther, 1863 C. squamulosus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) Cryptophis Worrell, 1961 C. boschmai (Brongersma, et al. 1964) C. incredibilis (Wells & Wellington, 1985) C. nigrescens (Gunther, 1862) C. nigrostriatus (Krefft, 1864) C. pallidiceps (Gunther, 1858) Demansia Gunther, 1858 D. angusticeps Shea, 2007 D. calodera Storr, 1978 D. cupreiceps Storr, 1978 D. flagellatio Shea, 2007 © 2020 Brian Bush, Snakes Harmful & Harmless D. olivacea (Gray, 1842) D. papuensis (Macleay, 1877) D. psammophis (Schlegel, 1837) D. quaesitor Shea, 2007 D. reticulata (Gray, 1842) D. rimcola Shea, 2007 D. rufescens Storr, 1978 D. shinei Shea, 2007 D. simplex Storr, 1978 D. torquata (Gunther, 1862) D. vestigiata (De Vis, 1884) Denisonia Krefft, 1869 D. devisi Waite & Longman, 1920 D. maculata (Steindachner, 1867) Drysdalia Worrell, 1961 D. coronoides (Gunther, 1858) D. mastersii (Krefft, 1866) D. rhodagaster (Jan & Sordelli, 1873) Echiopsis Fitzinger, 1843 E. curta (Schlegel, 1837) Elapognathus Boulenger, 1896 E. coronatus (Schlegel, 1837) E. minor (Gunther, 1863) Furina Duméril, 1853 F. barnardi (Kinghorn, 1939) F. diadema (Schlegel, 1837) F. dunmalli (Worrell, 1955) F. ornata (Gray, 1842) F. tristis (Gunther, 1858) Hemiaspis Fitzinger, 1860 H. damelli (Gunther, 1876) H. signata (Jan, 1859) Hoplocephalus Wagler, 1830 H. bitorquatus (Jan, 1859) H. bungaroides (Schlegel, 1837) H. stephensi Krefft, 1869 Notechis Boulenger, 1896 N. scutatus (Peters, 1861) Neelaps Gunther, 1863 N. bimaculatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) N. calonotus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) © 2020 Brian Bush, Snakes Harmful & Harmless Oxyuranus Kinghorn, 1923 O. microlepidotus (McCoy, 1879) O. scutellatus (Peters, 1867) O. temporalis Doughty, et al. 2007 Paroplocephalus Keogh, Scott & Scanlon, 2000 P. atriceps (Storr, 1980) Pseudechis Wagler, 1830 P. australis (Gray, 1842) P. butleri Smith, 1982 P. colletti Boulenger, 1902 P. guttatus De Vis, 1905 P. papuanus (Peters & Doria, 1878) P. porphyriacus (Shaw, 1794) P. weigeli (Wells & Wellington, 1987) Pseudonaja Gunther, 1858 P. affinis Gunther, 1872 P. a. affinis P. a. exilis Storr, 1989 P. a. tanneri (Worrell, 1961) P. aspidorhyncha Skinner, 2008 P. guttata (Parker, 1926) P. inframacula (Waite, 1925) P. ingrami (Boulenger, 1908) P. mengdeni Skinner, 2008 P. modesta (Gunther, 1872) P. nuchalis Gunther, 1858 P. textilis (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) Rhinoplocephalus Muller, 1885 R. bicolor Muller, 1885 Simoselaps Jan, 1859 S. anomalus (Sternfeld, 1919) S. bertholdi (Jan, 1859) S. littoralis (Storr, 1968) S. minimus (Worrell, 1960) Suta Worrell, 1961 S. dwyeri (Worrell, 1956) S. fasciata (Rosen, 1905) S. flagellum (McCoy, 1878) S. gaikhorstorum Maryan, Brennan, Hutchinson & Lukas, 2020 S. gouldii (Gray, 1841) S. monachus (Storr, 1964) S. nigriceps (Gunther, 1863) S. ordensis (Storr, 1984) S. punctata (Boulenger, 1896) © 2020 Brian Bush, Snakes Harmful & Harmless S. spectabilis (Krefft, 1869) S. suta (Peters, 1863) Tropidechis Gunther, 1863 T. carinatus (Krefft, 1863) Vermicella Gunther, 1858 V. annulata (Gray, 1841) V. intermedia Keogh & Smith, 1996 V. multifasciata Longman, 1915 V. parscauda Derez, Arbuckle, Ruan, Xie, Huang, Dibben, Shi, Vonk & Fry, 2018 V. snelli Storr, 1968 V. vermiformis Keogh & Smith, 1996 Marine Elapids ( 34 species, WA - 25 ) (all are front-fanged species) Acalyptophis Boulenger, 1896 A. peronii (Duméril, 1853) Aipysurus Lacépède, 1804 A. apraefrontalis Smith, 1926 A. duboisii Bavay, 1869 A. eydouxii (Gray, 1849) A. foliosquama Smith, 1926 A. fuscus (Tschudi, 1837) A. laevis Lacépède, 1804 A. pooleorum Smith, 1974 A. tenuis Lönnberg & Andersson, 1913 Disteira Lacépède, 1804 D. kingii Boulenger, 1896 D. major (Shaw, 1802) D. stokesii (Gray, 1846) Emydocephalus Krefft, 1869 E. annulatus Krefft, 1869 E. orarius Nankivell, Goiran, Hourston, Shine, Rasmussen, Thomson & Sanders, 2020 Enhydrina Gray, 1849 E. schistose (Daudin, 1803) - WA? Ephalophis Smith, 1931 E. greyae Smith, 1931 Hydrelaps Boulenger, 1896 H. darwiniensis Boulenger, 1896 Hydrophis Sonnini & Latreille, 1802 © 2020 Brian Bush, Snakes Harmful & Harmless H. atriceps Gunther, 1864 – WA? H. caerulescens (Shaw, 1802) H. coggeri (Kharin, 1984) H. czeblukovi (Kharin, 1984) H. elegans (Gray, 1842) H. gracilis (Shaw, 1802) H. inornatus (Gray, 1849) H. macdowelli Kharin, 1983 H. melanosoma Gunther, 1864 H. ornatus (Gray, 1842) H. pacificus Boulenger, 1896 H. vorisi Kharin, 1984 Lapemis Gray, 1835 L. curtus (Shaw, 1802) Parahydrophis Burger & Natsuno, 1974 P. mertoni (Roux, 1910) Pelamis Daudin, 1803 P. platurus (Linnaeus, 1766) Subfamily Laticaudinae Sea Kraits Laticauda Laurenti, 1768 L. colubrina (Schneider, 1799) L. laticaudata (Linnaeus, 1758) © 2020 Brian Bush, Snakes Harmful & Harmless .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sea Snakes Lose Their Stripes to Deal with Pollution : Nature News
    NATURE | NEWS Sea snakes lose their stripes to deal with pollution Melanin pigment in darkened skin binds to pollutants and helps animals rid themselves of chemicals. Rachael Lallensack 10 August 2017 Klaus Stiefel The melanin pigment in the turtle-headed sea snake's dark bands binds to pollutants. Sea snakes that live in polluted waters have evolved to ‘fill in’ their light stripes, darkening their skins to cope with pollution. The finding1 adds turtle-headed sea snakes (Emydocephalus annulatus) to the diverse list of creatures that exhibit ‘industrial melanism’, when darker animal varieties become dominant in polluted environments. The phenomenon is a classic example of natural selection, and one of the best-known cases — the spread of the dark version of the peppered moth in sooty nineteenth-century Britain — is often quoted in biology textbooks. For decades, evolutionary ecologist Rick Shine has snorkelled in the bays of Nouméa in the South Pacific island of New Caledonia to study the sea snake species and collect their shed skins. Over the years, while studying the Related stories Related stories snakes in the Indo–Pacific, he • Dark satanic wings • Dark satanic wings noticed something curious: in some populations, most snakes were jet • Evolution sparks silence • Evolution sparks silence black, whereas in others, most of the crickets of the crickets sported pale banding or blotchy • The peppered moth's • The peppered moth's white markings. dark genetic past dark genetic past revealed revealed In 2014, Claire Goiran, a marine biologist at the University of New More related stories More related stories Caledonia in Nouméa who sometimes helped Shine to collect sea snakes, came across a study about Parisian pigeons2.
    [Show full text]
  • Browsing by the Sea Snake Emydocephalus Annulatus
    Functional Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. Ecology 2004 A novel foraging mode in snakes: browsing by the sea snake 18, 16–24 Emydocephalus annulatus (Serpentes, Hydrophiidae) R. SHINE,† X. BONNET, M. J. ELPHICK and E. G. BARROTT Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia Summary 1. Ecologists often ascribe considerable importance to traits that are widespread within a specific lineage but rarely seen in other kinds of organisms. Unfortunately, such hypotheses cannot be tested robustly unless there is variation in expression of the trait within that lineage; such ‘exceptions to the rule’ provide opportunities to falsify predictions about putative functional correlates of the focal trait. 2. Research on snake foraging has emphasized species that feed infrequently and take large prey, often from ambush positions, but these characteristics do not apply to all snakes. 3. Movement patterns and feeding rates of free-ranging Turtle-Headed Sea Snakes Emydocephalus annulatus (Krefft 1869) were quantified in coral reefs of New Caledonia. These snakes forage by moving slowly (<2 m min−1) but consistently across the sub- strate as they investigate crevices and burrows for fish nests. The snakes feed frequently (sometimes, several times per hour) on large numbers of very small (1 × 0·5 mm2) eggs. Snakes weighed more than one hundred thousand times as much as the prey items (eggs) they consumed, in contrast to high relative prey masses often reported for other snake species. 4. Field experiments in which snakes were exposed to a variety of stimuli indicate that these animals locate their prey by scent rather than visual cues.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, Volume 52, Number 2, Pp
    Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, volume 52, number 2, pp. 235–244 doi:10.1093/icb/ics081 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology SYMPOSIUM Effects of Oceanic Salinity on Body Condition in Sea Snakes Franc¸ois Brischoux,1,*,† Virginie Rolland,‡ Xavier Bonnet,* Matthieu Caillaud§ and Richard Shineô *Centre d’Etudes Biologiques de Chize´, CEBC-CNRS UPR 1934, 79360 Villiers en Bois, France; †Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; ‡Department of Biological Sciences, PO Box 599, State University, Jonesboro, AR 72467, USA; §IFREMER Nouvelle Cale´donie, LEADNC, Campus IRD, BP 2059, 98846 Noume´a Cedex, Nouvelle Cale´donie, France; ôSchool of Biological Sciences A08, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia From the symposium ‘‘New Frontiers from Marine Snakes to Marine Ecosystems’’ presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 3–7, 2012 at Charleston, South Carolina. 1E-mail: [email protected] Downloaded from Synopsis Since the transition from terrestrial to marine environments poses strong osmoregulatory and energetic chal- lenges, temporal and spatial fluctuations in oceanic salinity might influence salt and water balance (and hence, body condition) in marine tetrapods. We assessed the effects of salinity on three species of sea snakes studied by mark– http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/ recapture in coral-reef habitats in the Neo-Caledonian Lagoon. These three species include one fully aquatic hydrophiine (Emydocephalus annulatus), one primarily aquatic laticaudine (Laticauda laticaudata), and one frequently terrestrial laticaudine (Laticauda saintgironsi). We explored how oceanic salinity affected the snakes’ body condition across various temporal and spatial scales relevant to each species’ ecology, using linear mixed models and multimodel inference.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake Venom Potency and Yield Are Associated with Prey-Evolution, Predator Metabolism and Habitat Structure
    Snake venom potency and yield are associated with prey-evolution, predator metabolism and habitat structure Kevin Healy a, b, c, *, Chris Carbone d and Andrew L. Jackson a. a Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. b School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK. c School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Republic of Ireland. d Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK * Corresponding author: [email protected], School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK. Short running title Macroecological factors drive venom evolution Article type: Letters Number of words in abstract: 150 Number of words in main text: 4984 Number of references: 73 Number of Figures: 4 Statement of authorship KH collated the dataset and conducted the analysis. All authors contributed to the analysis, design, discussion and interpretation of the results, and writing of the manuscript. Data accessibility statement Data available from the Figshare Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7128566.v1 Keywords Venom, Body size, Comparative analysis, Scaling, trophic ecology, Macroecology, LD50, Phylogenetic analysis, Snake, Abstract Snake venom is well known for its ability to incapacitate and kill prey. Yet, potency and the amount of venom available varies greatly across species, ranging from the seemingly harmless to those capable of killing vast numbers of potential prey. This variation is poorly understood, with comparative approaches confounded by the use of atypical prey species as models to measure venom potency. Here, we account for such confounding issues by incorporating the phylogenetic similarity between a snake’s diet and the species used to measure its potency.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of Australia 2A
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 36. FAMILY HYDROPHIIDAE Harold Heatwole & Harold G. Cogger 36. FAMILY HYDROPHIIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION The family Hydrophiidae, or true sea snakes, includes the majority of marine serpents and is the most completely marine of all extant reptilian taxa. Reptiles of other marine groups either lay their eggs on land (marine turtles, laticaudid snakes) or have freshwater or terrestrial species in addition to marine ones (acrochordids, colubrids, crocodilians). The Hydrophiidae never come out on land voluntarily and all live in salty water except two lake-locked species that have a marine origin. The family is characterised by several features that reflect their adaptation to a marine environment. These include valvular nostrils, a lingual fossa and a vertically compressed, paddle-shaped tail; all species are viviparous (Cogger 1992). There are two subfamilies in Australian waters, the Ephalophiinae which comprises five genera and 11 species and the Hydrophiinae containing seven genera and 20 species. Books dealing with the general biology of sea snakes include Dunson (1975a) and Heatwole (1987) and there are a number of review papers (Pickwell 1972; Heatwole 1977a, 1977c, 1978a; Cogger & Heatwole 1978; Minton & Heatwole 1978; Limpus 1987). Cantor (1841) and Bergman (1949, 1962) described the anatomy and/or presented meristic data. Hibbard (1975) reviewed their sensory perception. Vigle & Heatwole (1978) and Culotta & Pickwell (1993) compiled bibliographies on the Hydrophiidae. The Australian species have been reviewed (Cogger 1992) and catalogued (Cogger, Cameron & Cogger 1983), and faunas of Australian regions treated (Shuntov 1971; Dunson 1975b; Heatwole 1975c, 1977d; Limpus 1975b; Minton & Heatwole 1975; Redfield, Holmes & Holmes 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • (Emydocephalus Annulatus) in the Bohol Sea, Philippines
    SEAVR 2019: 035‐036 ISSN: 2424‐8525 Date of publication: 26 February 2019 Hosted online by ecologyasia.com New locality records of the Turtle‐headed Seasnake (Emydocephalus annulatus) in the Bohol Sea, Philippines Abner A. BUCOL [email protected] Observer: Abner A. Bucol. Photograph by: Abner A. Bucol. Subject identified by: Abner A. Bucol. Location: Bitaug, Enrique Villanueva, Siquijor, Philippines (9.302555°N, 123.608498°E) Depth: 2‐3 metres. Habitat: coral reef crest with extensive macroalgae (Sargassum sp.). Date and time: 05 May 2015, 15:30 hrs. Identity of subject: Turtle‐headed Seasnake, Emydocephalus annulatus (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae). Description of record: While conducting a fish survey on the coral reef of Bitaug, Enrique Villanueva, Siquijor a single Turtle‐headed Seasnake Emydocephalus annulatus was observed and photographed (Fig. 1). The seasnake rested for about 10 minutes, after which it started foraging the coral reef bottom. In addition to this record, the species is now documented from other locations (see Site Summary below). Fig. 1. Emydocephalus annulatus from Bitaug, Enrique Villanueva, Siquijor. © Abner A. Bucol 35 Site Summary: Based on the author’s records, and images from other unpublished sources (mainly from underwater surveys made by staff of Silliman University Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management [SUAKCREM] ), Emydocephalus annulatus is now known from the following sites : 1) Snake Reef near Pamilacan Island, Bohol (see Alcala et al., 2000) 2) Banilad, Mangnao Oct 14,
    [Show full text]
  • Emydocephalus Annulatus) Shifts with the Tides Claire Goiran1, Gregory P
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The behaviour of sea snakes (Emydocephalus annulatus) shifts with the tides Claire Goiran1, Gregory P. Brown2 & Richard Shine2* Tidal cycles are known to afect the ecology of many marine animals, but logistical obstacles have discouraged behavioural studies on sea snakes in the wild. Here, we analyse a large dataset (1,445 observations of 126 individuals) to explore tidally-driven shifts in the behaviour of free-ranging turtle- headed sea snakes (Emydocephalus annulatus, Hydrophiinae) in the Baie des Citrons, New Caledonia. Snakes tended to move into newly-inundated areas with the rising tide, and became more active (e.g. switched from inactivity to mate-searching and courting) as water levels rose. However, the relative use of alternative habitat types was largely unafected by tidal phase. Evolutionary shifs between terrestrial and marine habitats have occurred in several lineages of vertebrates, notably in mammals, reptiles and birds1,2. Such a habitat shif exposes organisms to novel abiotic and biotic challenges3; for example, oceanic habitats are more stable thermally than are many terrestrial habitats, but experience profound shifs in current and water depth with the tidal cycle4,5. In turn, tide-determined changes in biologically important processes (such as reproductive opportunities, prey availability and vulnerability to predators) have favoured adaptive matching of behaviour to tidal phase in many marine species 6–11. Especially for organisms that inhabit relatively shallow waters, tidal cycles may be a key driver of habitat use, activity level and ecological interactions4. Sea snakes have attracted little research in this respect, in contrast to the extensive information available on efects of environmental parameters on activity patterns of terrestrial snakes12–14.
    [Show full text]
  • (Updated April 2020) Reptiles and Frogs Tympanocryptis Taxonomic
    Changes from the WA Museum Checklist from October 2019 (updated April 2020) Reptiles and Frogs Tympanocryptis taxonomic revisions. Ongoing revisionary work by Melville and colleagues has revealed that T. lineata is a south-eastern species near Canberra. This results in the former subspecies of T. lineata – centralis and macra – being raised to full species: T. centralis and T. macra. This action was taken in the Melville & Wilson (2019). Melville, J. & Wilson, S. (2019). Dragon lizards of Australia: evolution, ecology and a comprehensive field guide. Melbourne: Museum Victoria Press. Revision of the Gehyra australis-koira complex. Further Gehyra gecko revisions have occurred, this time with the northern tropical species being examined. Based on genetics and morphology, Oliver et al. (2019) found evidence for nine species within the current taxonomy of G. australis and G. koira (with two subspecies). As a result of the work, G. australis is restricted to the Top End of the Northern Territory, and no longer occurs in WA. Instead, the WA and southern NT species formerly called G. australis, is now G. gemina. Within the G. koira group, the species are: G. koira, G. ipsa (raised from a subspecies of koira), G. calcitectus and G. chimera. Oliver, P.M., Prasetya, A.M., Tedeschi, L.G., Fenker, J., Ellis, R.J., Doughty, P. and Moritz, C.C. (2020). Convergence and crypsis: integrative taxonomic revision of the Gehyra australis group (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northern Australia. PeerJ: 8:e7971. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7971. Raising of Nephrurus wheeleri and Pletholax gracilis subspecies. Each of these species contained a subspecies added by Glen Storr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Supporting Information Supplementary Methods the Main Purposes of Use of Wild Animal and Plant Species Recorded in the Red
    1 Supporting information 2 3 Supplementary Methods 4 5 The main purposes of use of wild animal and plant species recorded in the Red List 6 7 We investigated the prevalence of different purposes of use from the use and trade information. 8 Because completing the Use and Trade classification scheme is not mandatory for Red List 9 assessors, we investigated the prevalence of Use and Trade coding to decide which species 10 groups to include in our analyses. We selected taxonomic groups for inclusion based on the 11 following criteria: i) >40% of all extant, data sufficient species, LC species and threatened 12 species have at least one purpose of use coded (thus selecting taxonomic groups with high 13 prevalence of use); and / or ii) the proportion of LC species with at least one purpose of use code 14 falls above or within the range of the proportion of species with Use and Trade coding across the 15 other Red List categories (thus also selecting taxonomic groups where use and trade may be 16 relatively low, but use and trade in LC species is coded to a similar level as that of species in 17 other RL categories). This limited our dataset to the following taxonomic groups which have 18 adequate recording of use and trade: birds, amphibians, reptiles, cycads, conifers and dicots from 19 the terrestrial group; and corals, bony fishes, crustaceans and cone snails from the aquatic species 20 group (Table S4). We excluded mammals, cephalopods and cartilaginous fishes as meeting 21 neither criteria i) nor ii), i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrophis Lapemoides (Gray, 1849) (Reptilia, Squamata, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae), Along the Coast of Bangladesh
    17 4 NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 17 (4): 1075–1080 https://doi.org/10.15560/17.4.1075 On the occurrence of Persian Gulf Sea Snake, Hydrophis lapemoides (Gray, 1849) (Reptilia, Squamata, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae), along the coast of Bangladesh Mohammad Abdul Wahed Chowdhury1, 2, Md. Rafiqul Islam1, 2, Abdul Auawal1, Harij Uddin2, Najmul Hasan2, Ibrahim Khalil Al Haidar1, 3* 1 Venom Research Centre, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram 4203, Bangladesh • MAWC: [email protected] https://orcid. org/0000-0003-2893-0026 • MRI: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5645-8454 • AA: [email protected] • IKAH: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1011-0882 2 Department of Zoology, University of Chittagong, Chattogram 4331, Bangladesh • HU: [email protected] • NH: najmulcu1998@gmail. com 3 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chittagong, Chattogram 4331, Bangladesh • [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1011-0882 * Corresponding author Abstract We provide the first evidence of the presence of the Persian Gulf Sea Snake,Hydrophis lapemoides (Gray, 1849), along the coast of Bangladesh. This species was assumed to exist in there, but neither specimens nor confirmed observa- tions exist until now. We document here the first confirmed record of H. lapemoides based on a freshly collected and taxonomically verified specimen from coastal Bangladesh. The Bangladeshi specimen had the following diagnostic characters: 55 black bands, a dorsal scale composition of 35:51:43, 342 ventrals, one pre-ocular, two post-oculars, 2+3 temporals, 8 supralabials (II largest and contact prefrontals; III–IV contact orbit) and 8 infralabials (I–IV contact genials).
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Snakes Fact Sheet
    Sea snakes Fact sheet With streamlined, boat-shaped bodies and flattened, paddle-like tails, sea SHARK BAY snakes are well adapted to marine life World Heritage and helpless on land. To prevent water entering lungs, valves close the nostrils while submerged. This is Description typically for about 30 minutes, although some can remain underwater for up to 2 hours. A special gland under the tongue Length Colour Venomous concentrates and excretes excess Up to 2m Varied Yes salt. Sea snakes prefer the warmer, shallower parts of the Indian and west Pacific Oceans and are found in a variety of habitats from mangroves, estuaries and reefs to the open ocean. They eat fish and some will also feed on fish eggs, molluscs and crustaceans. Diet and habitat Sea snakes are often seen from the Denham jetty in Shark Bay. Hydrophis major. Image: Blanche Danastas Female sea snakes give birth to live young at sea. Sea kraits are another group of snakes that live in the sea but lay eggs on land. Breeding Aipysurus pooleorum. Image: Blanche Danastas Aipysurus pooleorum. At least 22 species of sea snake have been recorded in Western Australia. The three most common in Shark Bay are the olive-headed sea snake (Hydrophis major), elegant sea snake (H. elegans); and Shark Bay sea snake (Aipysurus pooleorum), which Distribution is unique to the region. Less common is the turtle-headed sea snake (Emydocephalus annulatus). While many WA sea snakes are common, Shark Bay also hosts the Hydrophis major. Image: Blanche Danastas critically endangered leaf-scaled sea snake (Aipysurus foliosquama) and short-nosed sea snake (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Snakes Information Valid As of Feb 2012
    A Vulnerability Assessment for the Great Barrier Reef Sea snakes Information valid as of Feb 2012 World Heritage Area) include the Environment Protection Summary and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999; Great Barrier Diversity Reef Marine Park Act 1975; Fisheries Act 1994 (Qld); Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Qld). Sixteen species from the subfamily Hydrophiinae but only 14 species maintain permanent breeding populations in Existing management actions the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (the Marine Park). A number of management arrangements are in place in Susceptibility the World Heritage Area that 'operationalise' legislative management tools and provide additional guidance and/or High mortality from trawl by-catch. strategic direction to Marine Park management operations. Major pressures These include: Commercial fishing, climate change, coastal development • The joint Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and declining water quality. (GBRMPA) and Queensland Government Field Management Program that enforces spatial protection Cumulative pressures provided by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Sea snakes associated with inshore habitats are exposed Zoning Plan 2003 (only 34 per cent of the Marine Park to cumulative pressures resulting from climate change, open to otter trawling) coastal development, declining water quality and in some • Queensland Government management arrangements locations incidental by-catch from the trawl fishery. These under the East Coast Trawl Fishery (introduction of pressures are likely to impact on sea snakes directly and certain by-catch reduction devices in trawl apparatus the habitats and prey species they rely on. to help reduce sea snake by-catch and mortality). Management in the Great Barrier Reef and Great Barrier Reef Outlook Report 2009 adjacent areas in Queensland assessment Legislative management tools for the conservation of sea Poor, with little information available on which to base the snakes in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (the assessment grade.
    [Show full text]