In This Issue
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
To Download and Print a Product Information Sheet
GENERATION V The Complete Guide to Going, Being, and Staying Vegan as a Teenager Claire Askew Going vegan is the single most important thing you can do if you want to get serious about animal rights. Yet, going vegan isn’t always easy when you’re young. You’re living under your parents’ roof, you probably don’t buy your own groceries, and your friends, family, and teachers might look at you like you’re nuts. So, how do you do it? In this essential guide for the curious, aspiring, and current teenage vegan, Claire Askew draws on her years of experience as a teenage vegan and provides the tools for going vegan and staying vegan as a teen. Full of advice, stories, tips, and resources, Claire covers topics like: how to go vegan and stay sane; how to tell your parents so they don’t freak out; how to deal with friends who don’t get it; how to eat and stay healthy as a vegan; how to get out of dissection assignments in school; and tons more. Whether you’re a teenager who is thinking about going vegan or already vegan, this is the ultimate resource, written by someone SUBJECT CATEGORY like you, for you. FOOd-VegetARiAniSM/ PhilOSOPhY-ethicS ABOUT THE AUTHOR PRICE Claire Askew was born in 1990 and went vegan a few days after her $14.95 fifteenth birthday. After growing up in the Midwest, she is currently studying English and gender at a small liberal arts college in Portland, ISBN OR. She has been featured in VegNews magazine, the Vegetarian 978-1-60486-338-3 Journal, the Kansas City Star, and several podcasts, as well as the 2009 edition of Fiske Real College Essays That Work. -
MAC1 Abstracts – Oral Presentations
Oral Presentation Abstracts OP001 Rights, Interests and Moral Standing: a critical examination of dialogue between Regan and Frey. Rebekah Humphreys Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom This paper aims to assess R. G. Frey’s analysis of Leonard Nelson’s argument (that links interests to rights). Frey argues that claims that animals have rights or interests have not been established. Frey’s contentions that animals have not been shown to have rights nor interests will be discussed in turn, but the main focus will be on Frey’s claim that animals have not been shown to have interests. One way Frey analyses this latter claim is by considering H. J. McCloskey’s denial of the claim and Tom Regan’s criticism of this denial. While Frey’s position on animal interests does not depend on McCloskey’s views, he believes that a consideration of McCloskey’s views will reveal that Nelson’s argument (linking interests to rights) has not been established as sound. My discussion (of Frey’s scrutiny of Nelson’s argument) will centre only on the dialogue between Regan and Frey in respect of McCloskey’s argument. OP002 Can Special Relations Ground the Privileged Moral Status of Humans Over Animals? Robert Jones California State University, Chico, United States Much contemporary philosophical work regarding the moral considerability of nonhuman animals involves the search for some set of characteristics or properties that nonhuman animals possess sufficient for their robust membership in the sphere of things morally considerable. The most common strategy has been to identify some set of properties intrinsic to the animals themselves. -
It Really Brightens up Hearty Vegetables, Like Broccolini, and Something Magical Happens When It’S Combined with All That Sauteed Garlic
And thank you for the support! A zine is about the here and now. As I am typing this we are seven months into the pandemic. The restaurant has been open for a bit, mostly for delivery. We have a little outdoor seating, in the form of a few hijacked parking spots out front. There are tables up and down the block and people don’t mind much. That’s how things are now. The city is allowing some indoor dining, but we won’t be doing that any time soon. But let’s go back a few decades for the back back story... Since the 80s, I’ve been cooking vegan food in Brooklyn as a way to bring people together. In the form of feminist potlucks or hosting brunches at any of the two dozen apartments I’ve lived in all over the borough. Feeding people in the park through volunteer organizations, or at fur-free Friday in the 90s. Even just cooking some latkes for my family at Hannukah. Really, any opportunity to serve people vegan food and I’m in. So having a vegan restaurant in Brooklyn, just a few blocks from where my grandfather grew up actually, was a natural culmination of passion, community and a sense of duty. A few years ago, when I was well into my forties, I was lucky enough to partner with Sara and Erica, whose family also has had ties to the neighborhood for decades and who also just want everyone to eat vegan. Well, great! A meal is born.. -
Abolitionist Animal Rights: Critical Comparisons and Challenges Within the Animal Rights Movement
WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 11-2012 Abolitionist Animal Rights: Critical Comparisons and Challenges Within the Animal Rights Movement Corey Lee Wrenn Colorado State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/anirmov Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Civic and Community Engagement Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Wrenn, C. (2012). Abolitionist animal rights: critical comparisons and challenges within the animal rights movement. Interface, 4(2), 438-458. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Interface: a journal for and about social movements Article Volume 4 (2): 438 - 458 (November 2012) Wrenn, Abolitionist Animal Rights Abolitionist animal rights: critical comparisons and challenges within the animal rights movement Corey Wrenn Abstract The abolitionist movement is an emergent and radical approach to nonhuman animal rights. Calling for a complete cessation in nonhuman animal use through the abolishing of property status for nonhuman animals and an adoption of veganism and nonviolence, this approach stands in stark contrast to mainstream approaches such as humane production and welfare reform. This paper describes the goals and stances of abolitionism; the basic debate between abolitionism and other nonhuman animal rights movements; and the current state, challenges, and future prospects for abolitionism. It is argued that abolitionism, as developed by Francione, is the only morally consistent approach for taking the interests of nonhuman animals seriously. -
Issue 4 2017.Indd
2017 Scholarship Winners • Vegan Yogurt Guide Science, Caring, and Vegan Living VEGETAJ OURNAL R IANSince 1982 Veganized VOLUME XXXVI, NO 4 Southern THICS 8 Global • E Dishes Fare COLOGY Cornbread • E Travel the EALTH Flapjacks & H world in Jalapeño a stew pot! Jelly pg. 22 $4.50 USA/$5.50 CANADA www.vrg.org Quick Pumpkin Dishes NUTRITION HOTLINE QUESTION: What’s the latest of their breast cancer recurring REED MANGELS, PhD, RD thinking about soy and the risk than women who did not of breast cancer or breast cancer eat soyfoods.3 Women eating recurrence? S.A. via email soyfoods also had a lower risk of death.3 There is some evidence ANSWER: Soyfoods contain that soy products may boost the substances called isoflavones, effects of common drugs used which have a chemical structure to treat breast cancer such as similar to the hormone estrogen. tamoxifen.1 Both the American This similarity is what initially led Cancer Society and the American to concerns that soyfoods could Institute for Cancer Research have increase the risk of breast cancer said that it’s fine for breast cancer or of breast cancer recurrence. survivors to eat soy.4,5 Recent research does not support these concerns. Asian women who References eat traditional diets that typically 1. Messina M. Impact of soy foods on include soy products, have a lower the development of breast cancer and risk for breast cancer than do the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Forsch Komplementmed. 2016;23(2):75- women in the United States who 80. typically eat few soy products.1 Of course, there are other differences 2. -
Copyright by Melanie Kathryn Haupt 2012
Copyright by Melanie Kathryn Haupt 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Melanie Kathryn Haupt Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Starting from Scratch: Community, Connection, and Women’s Culinary Culture Committee: Domino Renee Pérez, Supervisor Patricia Roberts-Miller Elizabeth Engelhardt Lisa L. Moore Neville Hoad Starting from Scratch: Community, Connection, and Women’s Culinary Culture by Melanie Kathryn Haupt, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2012 Dedication For Big Mama, whose banana pudding delighted me; Granny, whose fried chicken haunts me; and Mom, who was a terrible cook. Acknowledgements In many ways, the dissertation is a group project. I have workshopped chapters with, bounced ideas off of, talked through tricky passages with, and cried to so many people over the course this project that I feel I should have a list of co-authors rather than an acknowledgements page. First and foremost, I have to thank my supervisor, Domino Renee Pérez, for her tough love, extensive feedback, and unwavering support over the course of this project’s peaks and valleys. I am so deeply grateful for your mentorship and your faith in me and in this project. I will also never forget the fateful day you suggested I might like a little book called Twilight. Trish Roberts-Miller, thank you for helping me pick up the pieces … twice. Elizabeth Engelhardt, I’m so glad to know you. -
American Vegan Society Pay by Mail, Phone, Or Fax; by Cash, Check, Or Credit Card
Ahimsa Lights the Way Second Series Volume 11 Number 3 Fall 2011 From Random House: Colleen’s Challenge Colleen Patrick-Goudreau fosters changes in lifestyle for the sake of the animals, to improve health, and to help the environment. Her latest book has launched with a major publisher. Simultaneously she joined a prestigious speakers’ bureau of bestselling authors. With her glamorous touch, good sense, and stressing the positive actions we can make, she allays fears of deprivation, and presents the benefits and bounties of vegan living. (Interview on page 7) ●Dietary Guidelines ●Jazzy Vegetarian ●ChocolaTree ●Vegan History ●Holiday CelebrationsAmerican ●VeganBreastfeeding 11—3, FALL 2011 1 ●Dinner Dates ●Doctors Discourses ●Vegan Superfoods Laura, the ... New Television Show! Jazzy Vegetarian airs nation- ally via public television stations. (Check your local listings.) Hosted by Laura Theodore, the series has 13 half-hour episodes showing, step-by-step, how to make healthy, earth-friendly dishes without dairy, meat, eggs, or other animal products. Laura Theodore, the Jazzy Vegetarian, is a vegan chef, radio host and televi- sion personality, award-winning jazz singer and actor, sustainable lifestyle blogger, and cookbook author. She is the proud creator of Jazzy Vegetarian and author of Jazzy Vegetarian: Lively Vegan Cuisine That's Easy and Delicious. Read more about Laura on www.jazzyvegetarian.com. Laura Theodore Photo by Joe Orecchio 2 American Vegan 11—3, FALL 2011 Photos: Fancy Stuffed Peppers: Warren Jefferson. Festive Zucchini Lasagna, Luscious Little Carrot Muffins: Andy Ebberbach. ixztÇ Y|Çx W|Ç|Çz Carême’s, Academy of Culinary Arts Atlantic Cape Community College 5100 Black Horse Pike (Rt 322), Mays Landing NJ 08330 www.atlantic.edu Carême’s is beside the on-campus bus stop. -
Animal-Industrial Complex‟ – a Concept & Method for Critical Animal Studies? Richard Twine
ISSN: 1948-352X Volume 10 Issue 1 2012 Journal for Critical Animal Studies ISSN: 1948-352X Volume 10 Issue 1 2012 EDITORAL BOARD Dr. Richard J White Chief Editor [email protected] Dr. Nicole Pallotta Associate Editor [email protected] Dr. Lindgren Johnson Associate Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Laura Shields Associate Editor [email protected] Dr. Susan Thomas Associate Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Richard Twine Book Review Editor [email protected] Vasile Stanescu Book Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Carol Glasser Film Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Adam Weitzenfeld Film Review Editor [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Matthew Cole Web Manager [email protected] ___________________________________________________________________________ EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD For a complete list of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board please see the Journal for Critical Animal Studies website: http://journal.hamline.edu/index.php/jcas/index 1 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume 10, Issue 1, 2012 (ISSN1948-352X) JCAS Volume 10, Issue 1, 2012 EDITORAL BOARD .............................................................................................................. -
Television Cooking Shows, Consumption, and Lifestyle Practices As Adult Learning
Kansas State University Libraries New Prairie Press Adult Education Research Conference 2009 Conference Proceedings (Chicago, IL) You are What You Eat!?: Television Cooking Shows, Consumption, and Lifestyle Practices as Adult Learning Robin Redmon Wright University of Texas at San Antonio, [email protected] Jennifer A. Sandlin Arizona State University Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/aerc Part of the Adult and Continuing Education Administration Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License Recommended Citation Wright, Robin Redmon and Sandlin, Jennifer A. (2009). "You are What You Eat!?: Television Cooking Shows, Consumption, and Lifestyle Practices as Adult Learning," Adult Education Research Conference. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2009/papers/70 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Adult Education Research Conference by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. You are What You Eat!?: Television Cooking Shows, Consumption, and Lifestyle Practices as Adult Learning Robin Redmon Wright, University of Texas at San Antonio Jennifer A. Sandlin, Arizona State University Abstract: A discussion of the public pedagogy of “celebrity chef” cooking shows, their promotion of consumer life-styles, and alternative cooking shows as sites of resistance to those lifestyles. Purpose of the Study Noam Chomsky (2003) has led an ongoing discussion about how a few multinational corporations have “manufactured the consent” of the American public for undemocratic public policies, environmentally damaging lifestyles, and oppressive cultural norms—despite the fact that such ideologically-laden actions are in sharp conflict with the interests of the majority of the population, the health of the culture, and the sustainability of the planet. -
![Beyond Anthropocentrism: Critical Animal Studies and the Political Economy of Communication [1]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/7152/beyond-anthropocentrism-critical-animal-studies-and-the-political-economy-of-communication-1-2537152.webp)
Beyond Anthropocentrism: Critical Animal Studies and the Political Economy of Communication [1]
The Political Economy of Communication 4(2), 54–72 © The Author 2016 http://www.polecom.org Beyond Anthropocentrism: Critical Animal Studies and the Political Economy of Communication [1] Nuria Almiron, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Keywords: anthropocentrism, speciesism, political economy of communication, ethics Abstract This article argues that the political economy of communication is ready and ethically obliged to expand its moral vision beyond human life, as other disciplines of the social sciences and humanities have already done. Such an expanded moral vision does not mean pushing human suffering to the background, but rather realizing that humans only form part of the planet, and are not above it. Not assigning individuals of other species the same moral consideration we do human beings has no ethical grounding and is actually deeply entangled with our own suffering within capitalist societies – it being particularly connected with human inequality, power relations, and economic interests. Decentering humanity to embrace a truly egalitarian view is the next natural step in a field driven by moral values and concerned with the inequality triggered by power relations. To make this step forward, this article considers the tenets of critical animal studies (CAS), an emerging interdisciplinary field which embraces traditional critical political economy concerns, including hegemonic power and oppression, from a non- anthropocentric moral stance. Critical media and communication scholars are concerned with what prevents human equality and social justice from blossoming. More particularly, they examine the fundamental role media and communication play in preventing or promoting social change. Those scholars devoted to the political economy of communication (PEC) focus upon the structural power relations involved in capitalism or, in Vincent Mosco’s words, in the “power relations that mutually constitute the production, distribution and consumption of resources, including communication resources” (2009: 2). -
Vleesconsumptie En Vegafobie Een Exploratie Van De Sociale Kenmerken Van Vleeseters, Vegafoben En Hun Omgeving
Universiteit Antwerpen Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen Academiejaar 2016 – 2017 MASTERPROEF VLEESCONSUMPTIE EN VEGAFOBIE EEN EXPLORATIE VAN DE SOCIALE KENMERKEN VAN VLEESETERS, VEGAFOBEN EN HUN OMGEVING Els Van Doorslaer Master in de Sociologie Promotor: Prof. Dr. F. Vandermoere Medebeoordelaar: Prof. Dr. G. Verschraegen Masterproef voorgelegd met het oog op het behalen van de graad van Master in de Sociologie Abstract This research examines the differences between meat- and non-meat-eaters. In addition, attention is paid to vegaphobia as the discrimination and aversion of meat-eaters over non-meat-eaters. Using survey data, a comparison will be made of meat- and non-meat-eaters in Belgium (N = 996). Next to the sociodemographic characteristics, the social environment is highlighted. Descriptive results of the sociodemographic features describe that meat-eaters (N = 842) are more often male and low- or middle-educated. Almost half of these meat-eaters have higher than average results on vegaphobia. The findings indicate that gender, education and age directly correlate with vegaphobia. The high vegaphobe meat-eaters are mainly male, lower educated and relatively older. In current times of attention to less meat eating, the motives of meat-eaters for their diet are examined. Taste, insufficient vegetarian alternatives and substitutes, disinterest, too expensive and religion/spirituality are the reasons why meat-eaters don’t turn into vegetarians. In contrast to different studies, attention is also paid at the social environment on meat-consumption and vegaphobia. This study demonstrates the important role of the social environment in explaining the variance in meat-consumption and vegaphobia. The influence of the social environment is first measured by the presence of a vegetarian in household, friends or family. -
Teaching Portfolio Je↵Sebo
Teaching Portfolio Je↵Sebo Contents Teaching and Inclusion Statements • Teaching and Outreach Experience • Student Evaluations and Comments • Syllabi of Courses Instructed • Teaching Statement My aim as a teacher is to show my students the value of living the examined life – of challenging our basic assumptions about the world in a rigorous and systematic way, developing a coherent set of beliefs and values, and living up to those beliefs and values as best we can. In my graduate courses, undergraduate courses, and outreach courses, I try to accomplish this aim in three main ways. First, I pick topics, readings, and assignments that approach ethical questions from an interdisciplinary and intersectional perspective. I also emphasize that philosophy is a holistic discipline where even the most abstract and seemingly esoteric arguments can have important implications for what to believe and what to do in everyday life. This allows my students to see how the study of philosophy is relevant to what they care about, no matter what that happens to be. Second, I lead discussions in a light-hearted way, with plenty of jokes, personal anecdotes, and pop culture references. But I also make it clear how much these issues mean to me, in a way that hopefully conveys to my students that we can practice philosophy well without losing our sense of humor or our perspective on what matters in everyday life. This allows my students to relate to me as well as to the course material more than they otherwise might, given the gravity of many of the topics we discuss.