The Love of the Nightingale by Timberlake Wertenbaker

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Love of the Nightingale by Timberlake Wertenbaker The Love of the Nightingale by Timberlake Wertenbaker Audition Date: Wednesday, September 11th, 6:45pm To Prepare: 1) Read the Play 2) Read this packet 3) Prepare a one-minute monologue accordingly. 1 This Packet. This audition packet is meant to provide actors with some preliminary information about the play as they prepare for their audition. It is intended as a supplement to reading Timberlake Wetenbaker’s script in its entirety, not a replacement. In other words: Read the play in its entirety. An attachment for the full script PDF is in the same email that contained this packet. Make sure to read through the different character breakdowns and give careful consideration as to what sort of monologue might showcase your ability to embody one of them. Do you relate to the early playfulness of Philomele? Her later defiance? Do you respond to the Niobe’s jaded resignation that there is terrible injustice in the world? What sort of monologue might communicate Tereus’s entitlement? What of Procne’s feelings of isolation when she goes to live in a foreign environment with an unfamiliar husband? Perhaps you enjoy the poetic commentary of the chorus. There are many ways to go, but consider the tone of the play and the emotional requirements of the characters. The Plot and its Sources. Let’s not mince words, Philomele is a horrifying myth; so horrifying that we need to ask ourselves why we would continue to tell it thousands of year since Sophocles presented a play based on it at the festival Dionsyia in the 5th century B.C.E. Like many Greek tragedies, the story of Philomele, Tereus, Procne, and Itys is a cautionary one. Only fragments of Sophocles’s play survive, but the story would later be popularized in Book VI (400-674) of Ovid’s Metamorphosis after Rome supplanted Greece as the preliminary power in the ancient Mediterranean world. Ovid’s version follows two princesses of Athens, Procne and Philomele. Their father, King Pandion, allies with King Tereus of Thrace in order to help Athens in a military conflict. King Pandion marries his older daughter, Procne, to Tereus to reward him for his valor in battle. Lonely and isolated in an unfamiliar land, Procne sends Tereus to retrieve her beloved younger sister who has promised to always come to her when called. Tereus is consumed with an all-consuming 2 passion upon seeing Philomele in Athens. On the journey back to Thrace he watches her like prey. Once they make land Tereus locks her away in a secluded tower. There, Tereus brutally assaults Philomele and cuts out her tongue when she threatens to expose him as a kidnapper and rapist. Tereus returns to Thrace and tells Procne that Philomele has died. Years pass and Philomele spends her time in captivity weaving a tapestry that depicts the terrible ways in which Tereus has violated her. She manages to have the tapestry secretly sent to her sister. Procne immediately recognizes it as Philomele’s work and understands its meaning. In Ovid’s version, Procne liberates her sister and the two kill Procne and Tereus’s son Itys as retribution for his father’s crimes. When Tereus discovers what his wife and her sister have done, he pursues them, but they are turned into birds; Procne a swallow, Philomele a nightingale, and Tereus a Hoopoe. (The Rape of Philomela by Tereus, Engraved by Virgil Solis, 1562 translation of the Metamorphoses) Wertenbaker’s play largely follows Ovid’s, but instead of a tapestry, Philomele creates life-sized dolls in order to act out Theseus’s crimes against her. Wertenbaker also borrows the mechanism of the chorus to bear witness and provide commentary as this excessively violent story 3 progresses towards its predetermined conclusion. Wertenbaker’s largest departure from the Metamorphosis lies in the fact that Procne and Philomele are not merely accessories in a story about a powerful man who brings about his own downfall. The relationship between sisters is centralized and their distinct personalities are developed prior to Tereus’s arrival into their lives. The ancient Greeks used tragedy to play out their worst nightmares and while they often feature complex female characters, one has to remember that these were plays written by men, for men, and performed exclusively by men in a highly patriarchal society. Wertenbaker makes her focus more equitable. This is not to say that the story is any more palatable. (490, Attic wine cup, Procne and Philomela prepare to kill Ithys) 4 Much like Medea, Nightingale is a revenge tragedy. In this genre a violent crime is committed that cannot be appropriately redressed because the perpetrator occupies a position of power. For instance, in Shakespeare’s later revenge tragedy, Hamlet cannot accuse Claudius of murder without evidence because Claudius is now the king. The disenfranchised victim takes justice into their own hands and often becomes a monster in the process. Their revenge is excessive in that it harms not just the guilty party, but innocents suffer as collateral damage. In this case Itys is horrifically murdered by his mother and aunt. (Tereus confronted with the head of Son Ithys, Oil, Paul Rubens 1636-1638) In short, the audience experiences shock and horror as the original victim becomes the victimizer. Aristotle states that most Greek tragedies center around some kind of “agon,” an argument or a thesis. Ancient Plays like Medea, Antigone, and early modern ones like Hamlet and Titus Andronicus collectively make a statement about violence begetting violence; about the dangers of robbing someone of their humanity so completely that they respond in an inhuman way. The cautionary thesis of many revenge plays seems to be the same: when you rip away someone’s 5 agency, when you violate them and rob them of their voice, terrible things happen. The plays in no way celebrate the revenge trajectory, rather they caution against lawless, vigilante justice and the chaos that the abuse of power incites. (The Rape of Philomela by Tereus Engraving, Johann Wilhelm Baur, 1703 edition of the Metamorphoses) Character Breakdown: Philomele: Philomele begins the play as a young and naïve princess of Athens. She is the energetically positive and somewhat irreverent younger sister to the more reserved Procne. While Procne is cautious and well respected, Philomele says what is on her mind without always thinking of the consequences. She is incredibly excited about all of that waits for her as she embarks on her adult life, especially love and sex. She is also infallibly loyal. Philomele promises her older sister that she will come to her whenever she is called and makes no hesitation to undertake a treacherous sea voyage to an unfamiliar land when her brother-in-law, Tereus comes to fetch her at Procne’s behest. Philomele is idealistic, and as a princess of Athens, a little bit entitled. She trusts that things will turn out right for her and that people will do what is right. This 6 makes her tragedy all the more devastating. She suffers a horrible fate, but she does not cower when faced with her attacker even when it results in further assault and violence. Philomele refuses to be a victim. Even when her tongue is removed and she is hidden away, she finds a way to speak her truth. She ultimately acts as her own avenger in a ruthless and violent way. Procne. Philomele states at one point that the Athenians admired Procne because of her dignity. At the onset of the play, Procne appears far more measured and cautious than her younger sister. She often reaches towards logic rather than emotion to solve her problems. She is the serious sister. While her younger sister cannot wait to experience sex and marriage, Procne seems to regard it as a duty; a necessary evil. Once in Thrace, she performs her role as a wife to Tereus in a perfunctory way, but she feels utterly isolated. She fails to assimilate and cannot find common ground with her women attendants. In perhaps a selfish act, she sends for her sister. Like Philomele, Procne strongly belongs in right and wrong and has little tolerance for ambiguity and deceit. Tereus: Tereus is the King of Thrace. He is a soldier, general, and absolute ruler. His men obey him without question and is used to getting what he wants whether it be through strategy and stealth or outright physical strength. He considers himself a good guy and is proficient at coming up with reasons that defend his choices. In some mythological variants, Tereus is son of the war god Ares and a Naiad named Bistonis, which may explain (but not justify) his proclivity to violence. (There is a difference between Ares- more associated with berserker rage in combat and Athena- more associated with military strategy in the Greek pantheon). Niobe: Niobe functions as Philomele’s chaperone once she embarks on her journey to Thrace. She is described as an old woman and is often the source of ridicule and entertainment amongst the sailors. She has seen much in the world, most or it tragic. We later learn that she too has been the victim of horrific violence. She had many sisters before her village was destroyed, its men killed and its women enslaved. When she seems 7 somewhat unsympathetic to Philomele later, one must also consider that she is likely a slave to the Athenian royal family, a victim of imperialism and violence in her own right. This has left her oddly resigned to what she would classify as the ways of the world; the strong will take what they want from the weak and it is better not too fight back lest you further provoke your attacker.
Recommended publications
  • 2013%Yale%Certamen%Invitational% Intermediate%Division% Round%1% %
    2013%Yale%Certamen%Invitational% Intermediate%Division% Round%1% % 1. What elderly senator succeeded Domitian as emperor in 96 A.D.? NERVA B1 Give the name of the mistress of the Praetorian Prefect who led the conspiracy to assassinate Domitian. DOMITIA B2 What palace servant stabbed Domitian? STEPHANUS 2. What fisherman found and cared for Danaë and the infant Perseus? DICTYS B1 Name Dictys’s cruel brother. POLYDECTES B2 On what island did Dictys and Polydectes live? SERIPHOS 3. For the verb tollō, tollere give the 2nd person plural, imperfect, passive, indicative. TOLLĒBĀMINĪ B1 Make tollēbāminī 1st person. TOLLĒBĀMUR B2 Make tollēbāmur perfect. SUBLĀTĪ/-AE/-A SUMUS 4. What is the meaning of the Latin adjective melior? BETTER B1 Give an antonym of melior? PEIOR B2 Give the superlative form of peior? PESSIMUS 5. The Greek chieftains Phoenix, Ajax the Greater, and Odysseus were assembled to appease what warrior and convince him to rejoin the war against the Trojans? ACHILLES B1 Who had organized this embassy after stealing Achilles’ concubine and evoking his anger? AGAMEMNON B2 What was the name of this concubine from Lyrnessus whom Agamemnon had stolen to replace his own? BRISEÏS 6. Translate the following sentence into English: hortus cotīdiē ab animālibus rūsticīs vīsitābātur. THE GARDEN WAS (BEING) VISITED BY RUSTIC ANIMALS EVERY DAY. 2013%Yale%Certamen%Invitational% Intermediate%Division% Round%1% % B1 Now translate this sentence: herba ā nōn solum leporibus sed etiam bovibus consumpta est. THE GRASS WAS/HAS BEEN EATEN NOT ONLY BY RABBITS BUT ALSO BY COWS/HEIFERS. B2 Restate the sentence posteā agricola dēfessus leporēs gladiō interfēcit in Latin by changing the verb to the passive voice yet keeping the overall meaning the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Athenians and Eleusinians in the West Pediment of the Parthenon
    ATHENIANS AND ELEUSINIANS IN THE WEST PEDIMENT OF THE PARTHENON (PLATE 95) T HE IDENTIFICATION of the figuresin the west pedimentof the Parthenonhas long been problematic.I The evidencereadily enables us to reconstructthe composition of the pedimentand to identify its central figures.The subsidiaryfigures, however, are rath- er more difficult to interpret. I propose that those on the left side of the pediment may be identifiedas membersof the Athenian royal family, associatedwith the goddessAthena, and those on the right as membersof the Eleusinian royal family, associatedwith the god Posei- don. This alignment reflects the strife of the two gods on a heroic level, by referringto the legendary war between Athens and Eleusis. The recognition of the disjunctionbetween Athenians and Eleusinians and of parallelism and contrastbetween individualsand groups of figures on the pedimentpermits the identificationof each figure. The referenceto Eleusis in the pediment,moreover, indicates the importanceof that city and its majorcult, the Eleu- sinian Mysteries, to the Athenians. The referencereflects the developmentand exploitation of Athenian control of the Mysteries during the Archaic and Classical periods. This new proposalfor the identificationof the subsidiaryfigures of the west pedimentthus has critical I This article has its origins in a paper I wrote in a graduateseminar directedby ProfessorJohn Pollini at The Johns Hopkins University in 1979. I returned to this paper to revise and expand its ideas during 1986/1987, when I held the Jacob Hirsch Fellowship at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. In the summer of 1988, I was given a grant by the Committeeon Research of Tulane University to conduct furtherresearch for the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Noé Sangariou: Étude Sur Le Déluge En Phrygie Et Le Syncrétisme Judéo-Phrygien, Paris : A
    Adolphe Joseph Reinach Noé Sangariou: Étude sur le déluge en Phrygie et le syncrétisme judéo-phrygien, Paris : A. Durlacher, 1913, 95 p. Ce document fait partie des collections numériques des Archives Paul Perdrizet, le projet de recherche et de valorisation des archives scientifiques de ce savant conservées à l’Université de Lorraine. Il est diffusé sous la licence libre « Licence Ouverte / Open Licence ». http://perdrizet.hiscant.univ-lorraine.fr NOÉ SANGARIOTJ tTUDE SUR LE D~LUGE EN PHRYGIE ET LE SYNCRÉTISME JUDÉO·PHRYGIEN PAR Adolphe REINACH PARIS LIBRAIRIE A. DURLACHER 83 bis, RUE LAFAYETTE i9!3 NOÉ SANGARIOTJ tTUDE SUR LE D~LUGE EN PHRYGIE ET LE SYNCRÉTISME JUDÉO·PHRYGIEN PAR Adolphe REINACH PARIS LIBRAIRIE A. DURLACHER 83 bis, RUE LAFAYETTE i9!3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOÉ SAN<;ARIOU ÉTUDE SUR LE DÉLUGE EN PHRYGIE ET LE SYNCHÉTISME JUDÉO-PHRYGIEN VERSAILLES. - IMP. CERF, !)9, RUE DUPLESSIS. NOÉ SANGARIOU ~TUDE SUR LE D~LUGE EN PHRYGIE ET LE SYNCRÉTISME JUD~O·PHRYGIEN PAR Adolphe REINACH PARIS LIBRAIRIE A. DURLACHER 83 bis, RUE LAFAYETTE 1913 NOÉ SANGARIOU ÉTUDE SOR LE DÉLUGE EN PHRYGIE ET LE SYNCRÉTISME JUDÉO-PHRYGIEN L'idée du présent mémoit·e est due à une découverte qui en explique le tit l'e. Le nom de Noé Sangariou, lu sur une épitaphe trouvée clans les fouilles de Tllasos, m'a aussitôt suggéré que, si l'on pouvait prouver que Noé fut un des noms portés par l'hypostase de la Grande Déesse J:?lu·ygienne connue généralement sons le nom de Nana, fille elu Sangarios, le fleuve de Cybèle, on pourrait clé­ duire de ce fait, pour la localisation à Apamée en Phrygie de l'Mche de Noé, une explication meilleure que celles qui ont été jus­ qu'ici proposées.
    [Show full text]
  • Kretan Cult and Customs, Especially in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods: a Religious, Social, and Political Study
    i Kretan cult and customs, especially in the Classical and Hellenistic periods: a religious, social, and political study Thesis submitted for degree of MPhil Carolyn Schofield University College London ii Declaration I, Carolyn Schofield, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been acknowledged in the thesis. iii Abstract Ancient Krete perceived itself, and was perceived from outside, as rather different from the rest of Greece, particularly with respect to religion, social structure, and laws. The purpose of the thesis is to explore the bases for these perceptions and their accuracy. Krete’s self-perception is examined in the light of the account of Diodoros Siculus (Book 5, 64-80, allegedly based on Kretan sources), backed up by inscriptions and archaeology, while outside perceptions are derived mainly from other literary sources, including, inter alia, Homer, Strabo, Plato and Aristotle, Herodotos and Polybios; in both cases making reference also to the fragments and testimonia of ancient historians of Krete. While the main cult-epithets of Zeus on Krete – Diktaios, associated with pre-Greek inhabitants of eastern Krete, Idatas, associated with Dorian settlers, and Kretagenes, the symbol of the Hellenistic koinon - are almost unique to the island, those of Apollo are not, but there is good reason to believe that both Delphinios and Pythios originated on Krete, and evidence too that the Eleusinian Mysteries and Orphic and Dionysiac rites had much in common with early Kretan practice. The early institutionalization of pederasty, and the abduction of boys described by Ephoros, are unique to Krete, but the latter is distinct from rites of initiation to manhood, which continued later on Krete than elsewhere, and were associated with different gods.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Mystery Cults and Visual Language in Graeco-Roman Antiquity: an Introduction
    1 Mystery Cults and Visual Language in Graeco-Roman Antiquity: An Introduction Nicole Belayche and Francesco Massa Like the attendants at the rites, who stand outside at the doors […] but never pass within. Dio Chrysostomus … Behold, I have related things about which you must remain in igno- rance, though you have heard them. Apuleius1 ∵ These two passages from two authors, one writing in Greek, the other in Latin, set the stage of this book on Mystery cults in Visual Representation in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. In this introductory chapter we begin with a broad and problematiz- ing overview of mystery cults, stressing the original features of “mysteries” in the Graeco-Roman world – as is to be expected in this collection, and as is necessary when dealing with this complex phenomenon. Thereafter we will address our specific question: the visual language surrounding the mysteries. It is a complex and daunting challenge to search for ancient mysteries,2 whether represented textually or visually, whether we are interested in their 1 Dio Chrysostomus, Discourses, 36, 33: ὅμοιον εἶναι τοῖς ἔξω περὶ θύρας ὑπηρέταις τῶν τελετῶν […] οὐδέ ποτ’ ἔνδον παριοῦσιν (transl. LCL slightly modified); Apuleius, Metamorphoses, 11, 23: Ecce tibi rettuli, quae, quamvis audita, ignores tamen necesse est (transl. J. Gwyn Griffiths, Apuleius of Madauros, The Isis-Book (Metamorphoses, book XI) (Leiden, Brill: 1975), 99). 2 Thus the program (2014–2018) developed at the research center AnHiMA (UMR 8210, Paris) on “Mystery Cults and their Specific Ritual Agents”, in collaboration with the programs “Ambizione” and “Eccellenza”, funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) and hosted by the University of Geneva (2015–2018) and University of Fribourg (2019–2023).
    [Show full text]
  • Ovid Book 12.30110457.Pdf
    METAMORPHOSES GLOSSARY AND INDEX The index that appeared in the print version of this title was intentionally removed from the eBook. Please use the search function on your eReading device to search for terms of interest. For your reference, the terms that ap- pear in the print index are listed below. SINCE THIS index is not intended as a complete mythological dictionary, the explanations given here include only important information not readily available in the text itself. Names in parentheses are alternative Latin names, unless they are preceded by the abbreviation Gr.; Gr. indi- cates the name of the corresponding Greek divinity. The index includes cross-references for all alternative names. ACHAMENIDES. Former follower of Ulysses, rescued by Aeneas ACHELOUS. River god; rival of Hercules for the hand of Deianira ACHILLES. Greek hero of the Trojan War ACIS. Rival of the Cyclops, Polyphemus, for the hand of Galatea ACMON. Follower of Diomedes ACOETES. A faithful devotee of Bacchus ACTAEON ADONIS. Son of Myrrha, by her father Cinyras; loved by Venus AEACUS. King of Aegina; after death he became one of the three judges of the dead in the lower world AEGEUS. King of Athens; father of Theseus AENEAS. Trojan warrior; son of Anchises and Venus; sea-faring survivor of the Trojan War, he eventually landed in Latium, helped found Rome AESACUS. Son of Priam and a nymph AESCULAPIUS (Gr. Asclepius). God of medicine and healing; son of Apollo AESON. Father of Jason; made young again by Medea AGAMEMNON. King of Mycenae; commander-in-chief of the Greek forces in the Trojan War AGLAUROS AJAX.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Ornithological Study of the Northern Region of Iranian Plateau, Including Bird Names in Native Language
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2012, 2 (1):222-241 ISSN: 2248 –9215 CODEN (USA): EJEBAU A systematic ornithological study of the Northern region of Iranian Plateau, including bird names in native language Peyman Mikaili 1, (Romana) Iran Dolati 2,*, Mohammad Hossein Asghari 3, Jalal Shayegh 4 1Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran 2Islamic Azad University, Mahabad branch, Mahabad, Iran 3Islamic Azad University, Urmia branch, Urmia, Iran 4Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary, Shabestar branch, Islamic Azad University, Shabestar, Iran ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT A major potation of this study is devoted to presenting almost all main ornithological genera and species described in Gilanprovince, located in Northern Iran. The bird names have been listed and classified according to the scientific codes. An etymological study has been presented for scientific names, including genus and species. If it was possible we have provided the etymology of Persian and Gilaki native names of the birds. According to our best knowledge, there was no previous report gathering and describing the ornithological fauna of this part of the world. Gilan province, due to its meteorological circumstances and the richness of its animal life has harbored a wide range of animals. Therefore, the nomenclature system used by the natives for naming the animals, specially birds, has a prominent stance in this country. Many of these local and dialectal names of the birds have been entered into standard language of the country (Persian language). The study has presented majority of comprehensive list of the Gilaki bird names, categorized according to the ornithological classifications.
    [Show full text]
  • (Eponymous) Heroes
    is is a version of an electronic document, part of the series, Dēmos: Clas- sical Athenian Democracy, a publicationpublication ofof e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org]. e electronic version of this article off ers contextual information intended to make the study of Athenian democracy more accessible to a wide audience. Please visit the site at http:// www.stoa.org/projects/demos/home. Athenian Political Art from the fi h and fourth centuries: Images of Tribal (Eponymous) Heroes S e Cleisthenic reforms of /, which fi rmly established democracy at Ath- ens, imposed a new division of Attica into ten tribes, each of which consti- tuted a new political and military unit, but included citizens from each of the three geographical regions of Attica – the city, the coast, and the inland. En- rollment in a tribe (according to heredity) was a manda- tory prerequisite for citizenship. As usual in ancient Athenian aff airs, politics and reli- gion came hand in hand and, a er due consultation with Apollo’s oracle at Delphi, each new tribe was assigned to a particular hero a er whom the tribe was named; the ten Amy C. Smith, “Athenian Political Art from the Fi h and Fourth Centuries : Images of Tribal (Eponymous) Heroes,” in C. Blackwell, ed., Dēmos: Classical Athenian Democracy (A.(A. MahoneyMahoney andand R.R. Scaife,Scaife, edd.,edd., e Stoa: a consortium for electronic publication in the humanities [www.stoa.org], . © , A.C. Smith. tribal heroes are thus known as the eponymous (or name giving) heroes. T : Aristotle indicates that each hero already received worship by the time of the Cleisthenic reforms, although little evi- dence as to the nature of the worship of each hero is now known (Aristot.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthenon Frieze: Viewed As the Panathenaic Festival Preceding the Battle of Marathon
    The Parthenon Frieze: Viewed as the Panathenaic Festival Preceding the Battle of Marathon By Brian A. Sprague Senior Seminar: HST 499 Professor Bau-Hwa Hsieh Western Oregon University Thursday, June 07, 2007 Readers Professor Benedict Lowe Professor Narasingha Sil Copyright © Brian A. Sprague 2007 The Parthenon frieze has been the subject of many debates and the interpretation of it leads to a number of problems: what was the subject of the frieze? What would the frieze have meant to the Athenian audience? The Parthenon scenes have been identified in many different ways: a representation of the Panathenaic festival, a mythical or historical event, or an assertion of Athenian ideology. This paper will examine the Parthenon Frieze in relation to the metopes, pediments, and statues in order to prove the validity of the suggestion that it depicts the Panathenaic festival just preceding the battle of Marathon in 490 BC. The main problems with this topic are that there are no primary sources that document what the Frieze was supposed to mean. The scenes are not specific to any one type of procession. The argument against a Panathenaic festival is that there are soldiers and chariots represented. Possibly that biggest problem with interpreting the Frieze is that part of it is missing and it could be that the piece that is missing ties everything together. The Parthenon may have been the only ancient Greek temple with an exterior sculpture that depicts any kind of religious ritual or service. Because the theme of the frieze is unique we can not turn towards other relief sculpture to help us understand it.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffering in Silence: Victims of Rape on the Tragic Stage. in PJ Finglass, & L
    Finglass, P. J. (2020). Suffering in silence: victims of rape on the tragic stage. In P. J. Finglass, & L. Coo (Eds.), Female Characters in Fragmentary Greek Tragedy (pp. 87–102). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108861199.008 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1017/9781108861199.008 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Cambridge University Press at https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/female-characters-in-fragmentary- greek-tragedy/suffering-in-silence/527E8EDEFB0B1AE7BD4A9AA507BC72DD. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ CHAPTER 6 Suffering in silence: victims of rape on the tragic stage P. J. Finglass One of the most moving scenes in Sophocles takes place immediately after the first choral song of his Trachiniae (141–496). To the chorus, who have entered to console Deianira as she longs for the return of her husband Heracles, Deianira describes the sorrows of marriage; in her view, marriage brings pain to a woman because it constantly causes her anxiety for her husband or her children. A Messenger suddenly enters with good news: Heracles is alive, having recently triumphed in a battle, and is shortly to return.
    [Show full text]
  • Literarysymbols.Pdf
    ADictionary of Literary Symbols This is the first dictionary of symbols to be based on literature,rather than“universal”psychological archetypes,myths,or esoterica.Michael Ferberhasassemblednearlytwohundredmainentriesclearly explaining and illustrating the literary symbols that we all encounter (such as swan,rose,moon,gold),along with hundreds of cross- references and quotations.The dictionary concentrates on English literature, but its entries range widely from the Bible and classical authors to the twentieth century,taking inAmerican and European literatures.Its informed style and rich references will make this book an essential tool not only for literary and classical scholars,but for all students of literature. michael ferber is professor of English and Humanities at the University of New Hampshire.His books include The Poetry of William Blake (1991) and The Poetry of Shelley (1993). ADictionary of Literary Symbols Michael Ferber CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, United Kingdom Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521591287 © Michael Ferber 1999 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published in print format 1999 ISBN-13 978-0-511-07416-5 eBook (Gale) ISBN-10 0-511-07416-6 eBook (Gale) ISBN-13 978-0-521-59128-7 hardback ISBN-10 0-521-59128-7 hardback ISBN-13 978-0-521-00002-4 paperback ISBN-10 0-521-00002-5 paperback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: the Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes
    This is a repository copy of Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: The Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/126374/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Haley, M orcid.org/0000-0002-7697-3568 (2018) Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: The Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes. Ramus, 47 (2). pp. 152-173. ISSN 0048-671X https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2018.12 © Ramus 2019. This article has been published in a revised form in Ramus: https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2018.12. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Ramus Submission 2017 Teknophagy and Tragicomedy: The Mythic Burlesques of Tereus and Thyestes Teknophagy (τεκνοφαγία), or child-eating, is an apt subject for tragedy.
    [Show full text]