Gilbert Collard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

(English version) Question for written answer E-003005/20 to the Commission Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Gilbert Collard (ID), Aurelia Beigneux (ID), Hélène Laporte (ID), Jérôme Rivière (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Nicolas Bay (ID), Annika Bruna (ID), Maxette Pirbakas (ID), Joëlle Mélin (ID), Catherine Griset (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Mathilde Androuët (ID) (15 May 2020) Subject: Further enlarging the Schengen Area The Schengen Area was set up to promote free movement by abolishing border controls. It has expanded considerably since 1985, when the agreement establishing the area was signed by five Member States. Today, signatories number 28 Member States and four Associated States. Moreover, the citizens of some 50 non-Schengen countries are exempt from visa requirements for entry. The coronavirus health pandemic has shown the limitations of free movement and its effects. At a meeting of the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on 7 May 2020, the European Commission Home Affairs Commissioner, Ylva Johansson, stated that she wanted Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia to join the Schengen Area. At a time when many Member States have reintroduced border controls and restricted movement between Member States, this mad rush to enlarge Schengen runs counter to what the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us. Can the Commission confirm that it wants to enlarge the Schengen Area and, if so, over what period of time? Does it intend to take into consideration the expectations of Member States rather than adopting a purely dogmatic approach? Supporters (1) Answer given by Ms Johansson on behalf of the European Commission (27 July 2020) The free movement of persons is a fundamental right guaranteed by the EU to its citizens. The Commission fully supports Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia to join the Schengen area. Croatia will need to continue working consistently on the implementation of all the ongoing actions, to ensure that the necessary conditions for the application of all relevant parts of the Schengen acquis continue to be met. An unanimous decision of the Council is necessary to allow for the full application of the Schengen acquis by these Member States and the Commission has no formal role in this process. |(⋅1∙|) This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Jean-François Jalkh (ID), Philippe Olivier (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
[Show full text]
Identitã€ E Democrazia
Identità e Democrazia Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera. Identità e Democrazia (in inglese: Identity and Identità e Democrazia Democracy, ID) è un gruppo politico del Parlamento Europeo di destra, fondato nel 2019 dopo le elezioni (EN) Identity and Democracy europee del 2019. Il gruppo è il successore del gruppo Presidente Marco Zanni fondato nel 2015 Europa delle Nazioni e della Libertà. (Lega) Vicepresidente Nicolas Bay (RN) Jörg Meuthen Indice (AfD) Storia Stato Unione Obiettivi politici europea Composizione Abbreviazione ID Note Fondazione 13 giugno 2019 Voci correlate Ideologia Nazionalismo Conservatorismo Storia nazionale Populismo di Il 12 giugno 2019 è stato annunciato che il gruppo destra successore a Europa delle Nazioni e delle Libertà si Identitarismo sarebbe chiamato "Identità e Democrazia" e avrebbe Sovranismo incluso partiti come la Lega Nord (Italia), Anti-immigrazione Raggruppamento Nazionale (Francia) e Alternativa per la Collocazione Destra [1] Germania (Germania)[2]. Il leghista Marco Zanni è stato Partito europeo AEPN nominato Presidente[3]. Il 13 giugno 2019 il gruppo, composto da 73 europarlamentari, è stato lanciato a Seggi 73 / 751 Bruxelles da Marine Le Pen[4]. Europarlamento Obiettivi politici I principali obiettivi politici del gruppo sono bloccare una maggiore integrazione europea ed ottenere maggiore autonomia nelle politiche di spesa, ovvero la possibilità di fare maggiore deficit e debito senza incorrere in penalità da parte della Commissione Europea.[5] Composizione Identità e Democrazia è formato da
[Show full text]
Priority Question for Written Answer
Priority question for written answer P-002058/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Mathilde Androuët (ID), Jordan Bardella (ID), Aurelia Beigneux (ID), Dominique Bilde (ID), Annika Bruna (ID), Gilbert Collard (ID), Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Catherine Griset (ID), Jean-François Jalkh (ID), France Jamet (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Hélène Laporte (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID), André Rougé (ID), Nicolas Bay (ID), Maxette Pirbakas (ID) Subject: Legal basis for geo-tracking and the sharing of personal data during the coronavirus outbreak On 24 March 2020, the Commission revealed that it had held talks with telecommunications operators about joining forces to tackle the coronavirus outbreak. Thierry Breton, the Internal Market Commissioner, held a videoconference with the heads of Europe’s telecommunications companies and the GSMA (Global System for Mobile Communications) to explore options for sharing geolocation metadata in order to map and forecast the spread of the virus. The Commission claims that such a move would be fully in line with the General Data Protection Regulation and e-privacy legislation. How does the Commission intend to guarantee EU citizens full anonymisation of their personal data? How exactly does the Commission envisage using such data? Not content with surveillance and quarantine enforcement, Israel and a number of Asian countries have adopted a proactive AI-based approach that alerts individuals if they have been in contact with a virus carrier. How do the Commission’s plans compare, and what logistical support will it provide the Member States which opt for this approach? PE650.848v01-00.
[Show full text]
GENERAL ELECTIONS in FRANCE 10Th and 17Th June 2012
GENERAL ELECTIONS IN FRANCE 10th and 17th June 2012 European Elections monitor Will the French give a parliamentary majority to François Hollande during the general elections on Corinne Deloy Translated by Helen Levy 10th and 17th June? Five weeks after having elected the President of the Republic, 46 million French citizens are being Analysis called again on 10th and 17th June to renew the National Assembly, the lower chamber of Parlia- 1 month before ment. the poll The parliamentary election includes several new elements. Firstly, it is the first to take place after the electoral re-organisation of January 2010 that involves 285 constituencies. Moreover, French citizens living abroad will elect their MPs for the very first time: 11 constituencies have been espe- cially created for them. Since it was revised on 23rd July 2008, the French Constitution stipulates that there cannot be more than 577 MPs. Candidates must have registered between 14th and 18th May (between 7th and 11th May for the French living abroad). The latter will vote on 3rd June next in the first round, some territories abroad will be called to ballot on 9th and 16th June due to a time difference with the mainland. The official campaign will start on 21st May next. The French Political System sembly at present: - the Union for a Popular Movement (UMP), the party of The Parliament is bicameral, comprising the National former President of the Republic Nicolas Sarkozy, posi- Assembly, the Lower Chamber, with 577 MPs elected tioned on the right of the political scale has 313 seats; by direct universal suffrage for 5 years and the Senate, – the Socialist Party (PS) the party of the new Head the Upper Chamber, 348 members of whom are ap- of State, François Hollande, positioned on the left has pointed for 6 six years by indirect universal suffrage.
[Show full text]
Marine Le Pen and the 'New' FN: a Change of Style Or of Substance?
Parliamentary Affairs (2013) 66, 179–196 doi:10.1093/pa/gss076 Marine Le Pen and the ‘New’ FN: A Change of Style or of Substance? James Shields* School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK Downloaded from *Correspondence: [email protected] The electoral challenge of the far right is an enduringly problematic feature of con- temporary French politics. In the first rounds of the 2012 presidential and parlia- mentary elections, the Front National (FN) under new leader Marine Le Pen http://pa.oxfordjournals.org/ attracted a combined total of ten million votes, bringing its ultra-nationalist pol- icies to the centre of national political debate. This article examines the FN’s impact on these elections and its implications for French politics. Drawing on of- ficial FN programmes, detailed election results and a range of opinion polling data, it assesses the strength of support for Le Pen and her party and seeks to explain their electoral appeal. In particular, it subjects to analysis the claim that the new leader has ‘de-demonised’ the FN, transforming it from perennial outsider by guest on December 15, 2012 to normal participant in mainstream French politics; and it reflects on the strategic dilemma posed for the centre-right by this newly invigorated far-right challenge. 1. Introduction The first round of the presidential election on 22 April 2012 set a new high point for the far right in France. With 17.9% of the vote, Marine Le Pen finished behind the Socialist candidate François Hollande (28.6%) and the outgoing centre-right president Nicolas Sarkozy (27.2%).
[Show full text]
En En Motion for a Resolution
European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0168/2020 10.6.2020 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 143 of the Rules of Procedure on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list Christine Anderson, Gerolf Annemans, Gunnar Beck, Aurelia Beigneux, Lars Patrick Berg, Dominique Bilde, Markus Buchheit, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gilbert Collard, Marcel de Graaff, Filip De Man, Derk Jan Eppink, Nicolaus Fest, Emmanouil Fragkos, Gianna Gancia, Catherine Griset, Roman Haider, Virginie Joron, Maximilian Krah, Joachim Kuhs, Jean-Lin Lacapelle, Gilles Lebreton, Jaak Madison, Thierry Mariani, Jörg Meuthen, Guido Reil, Jérôme Rivière, Rob Rooken, Robert Roos, Hermann Tertsch, Tom Vandendriessche, Harald Vilimsky, Charlie Weimers, Bernhard Zimniok, Milan Zver RE\1207171EN.docx PE647.651v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0168/2020 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list The European Parliament, – having regard to the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (2001/931/CFSP)1, ,– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/20 of 13 January 2020 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2019/13412,, – having regard to Rule 143 of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas a terrorist act is defined in Article 1(3) of the abovementioned Council Common Position; B. whereas Antifa has organised and carried out violent attacks in the United States under the guise of protesting the death of George Floyd; whereas Antifa is known to have incited and committed violence in Europe; whereas the movement has allegedly received training from other terrorist groups in Syria; 1.
[Show full text]
POLITICALLY BIASED ELECTION OBSERVATION – a Threat to the Integrity of International Institutions
Politically biased electionPolitically observation POLITICALLY BIASED ELECTION OBSERVATION – a threat to the integrity of international institutions – a threat to the integrity the to – a threat of international institutions POLITICALLY BIASED ELECTION OBSERVATION – a threat to the integrity of international institutions 2 Imprint Edition: European Platform for Democratic Elections www.epde.org Responsible for the content: Europaischer Austausch gGmbH Erkelenzdamm 59 10999 Berlin, Germany Represented through: Stefanie Schiffer EPDE is financially supported by the European Union and the Federal Foreign Office of Germany. The here expressed opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the donors. 3 Content Introduction 4 Detection and Prevention of politically Biased election observation (“fake observation”) in the OSCE region 7 Foreign Observation of the Illegitimate Presidential Election in Crimea in March 2018 13 Politically biased foreign electoral observation at the Russian 2018 presidential election 33 Politically Biased International Election Observation at the 2018 Regional Elections in Russia 63 The Globalisation of Pro-Kremlin Networks of Politically Biased Election Observation: The Cases of Cambodia and Zimbabwe 75 Foreign Observation of the Illegitimate “General Elections” in the Donetsk People’s Republic and Lugansk People’s Republic in November 2018 101 4 Introduction In recent years, we have witnessed the increasing phenomenon of “bi- ased observation”—a form of more politically-motivated election observation whose chief objective is to mislead the public regarding the regularity of some political process or the legitimacy of an election result. Striking examples were the “referendum” on Crimea in March 2014, the “elections” in Eastern Ukraine in November 2014, the Presidential and Parliamentary elections in Azerbaijan since 2013, and the Presidential elections in the Russian Federation in March 2018.
[Show full text]
The Digital Crusades: the Media and Western European Nationalists
The Digital Crusades: The Media and Western European Nationalists http://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2012/06/01/progres-et-reculs-du-vote- front-national_1711219_823448.html Haydn Rippon Principal Supervisor: Dr. Lee Duffield Associate Supervisor: Ass. Pro. Susan Carson Queensland University of Technology 2016 Abstract This thesis investigates the strategic media practices of the ‘new nationalist’ political parties and social movements in contemporary Western Europe. It refers to an extensive literature, interviews and a review of media artefacts related to these political parties and social movements, to establish how they achieved substantial public support in the present era. It uses four case studies, being three political parties and one activist social movement: the French Front National (FN), the Flemish Vlaams Belang (VB), Danish Dansk Folkeparti (DF) and the Europeanist-regionalist social movement, Bloc Identitaire (BI). The thesis draws on the work of Cas Mudde, who defines the parties as authoritarian, nativist and populist – referred to as ANPs in this research. It describes the central concern of the case study subjects with Islam in Europe, and their developing of the issue to gain support. In this monograph the broad issue, ‘Islam’, takes in mass immigration into Europe, integration or otherwise of Muslim populations, and the associated tensions. The research comes at a point when the party family is at a ‘tipping point’, with the growth of a political zeitgeist that is supportive of their broad thrust by an increasing number of voters in most of Europe, and this research considers the ANPs’ own efforts in the media field to be a contributing factor to the development of that zeitgeist.
[Show full text]
Dossier Rechtspopulismus
Dossier Rechtspopulismus bpb.de Dossier: Rechtspopulismus (Erstellt am 20.05.2021) 2 Einleitung Rechtspopulismus (© picture-alliance, abaca) Rechtspopulisten gehen davon aus, dass die Gesellschaft in zwei homogene Gruppen getrennt ist. Dem "reinen" Volk steht eine korrupte Elite gegenüber, amoralisch, im Kern verdorben. Die Rede vom Populisten ist momentan allgegenwärtig. Als politische Kampfvokabel dient das Wort auch der Diffamierung des Gegners. Dennoch gibt es Kriterien, mit denen die Politikwissenschaft versucht, das Phänomen des Rechtspopulismus möglichst trennscharf abzugrenzen. Die Schwarz- Weiß-Dichotomie "Volk" gegen "korrupte Elite" ist ein solches Kriterium. Andere Kriterien sind weniger deutlich, innerhalb "des Rechtspopulismus" wird auch gestritten um z.B. den richtigen Umgang mit gleichgeschlechtlichen Partnerschaften oder dem Verhältnis zum Staat Israel. Das Dossier zeigt, was Rechtspopulismus ist, an welcher Sprache man Rechtspopulisten erkennt und für welche Ideen sie streiten. Marcel Lewandowsky zum Begriff Rechtspopulismus. (http://www.bpb.de/mediathek/246881/marcel-lewandowsky- zum-begriff-rechtspopulismus) bpb.de Dossier: Rechtspopulismus (Erstellt am 20.05.2021) 3 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Was heißt Rechtspopulismus? 5 1.1 Das Syndrom des Populismus 6 1.2 Rechtspopulismus im europäischen Vergleich – Kernelemente und Unterschiede 12 1.3 Rechtspopulismus: Erscheinungsformen, Ursachen und Gegenstrategien 21 1.4 Was versteht man unter "Populismus"? 35 2. Sprache, Themen und politische Agitationsformen 39 2.1 Diskussionsräume
[Show full text]
European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results
Briefing June 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 7 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 3 seats 2 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Heinz Christian Strache 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide 6. Alexander Bernhuber 7. Barbara Thaler NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 1. Maria Arena* Socialist Party (PS) Christian Social Party 3. Johan Van Overtveldt 2. Marc Tarabella* (S&D) 2 seats (CSP) (EPP) 1 seat New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 1. Olivier Chastel (Greens/EFA) Reformist 2. Frédérique Ries* 4 seats Movement (MR) (ALDE) 2 seats 1. Philippe Lamberts* 2. Saskia Bricmont 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Ecolo (Greens/EFA) 2. Hilde Vautmans* 2 seats Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open 1. Benoît Lutgen Humanist VLD) (ALDE) 2 seats democratic centre (cdH) (EPP) 1 seat 1. Kris Peeters Workers’ Party of 1.
[Show full text]
Islamophobia in France
Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales Grado en Relaciones Internacionales Trabajo de Fin de Grado ISLAMOPHOBIA IN FRANCE The position of the Front National on the Charlie Hebdo and November 2015’s attacks in Paris Estudiante: Rocío García Nardiz Director: Ariel James Trapero Madrid, Abril de 2019 ABSTRACT The main purpose of this case study is to analyse the position of the National Front on the Charlie Hebdo and November 2015’s terrorist attacks in Paris, regarding the concept of Islamophobia in France, with the goal to determine whether this right-wing party is facilitating it or not. Through the analysis of the political programme of the French political party and different statements made by its leader, Marine Le Pen, this report will explore the meaning of Islamophobia, the National Front’s evolution and their recent rise, their stance on immigration and multiculturalism, the role the media press and intellectuals have played on the promotion of xenophobia, the attacks and how the National Front reacted to them. This study will also observe the opinion of French university students, as well as it will provide some theoretical and conceptual analyses to the problem. Keywords: Islamophobia, Charlie Hebdo, Le Pen, terrorism, National Front, Islam, Muslim, FranCe. RESUMEN Este trabaJo tiene como finalidad principal el análisis de la posición del Frente Nacional ante los ataques terroristas de Charlie Hebdo y noviembre de 2015 de París, centrado en el concepto de la islamofobia en Francia, para determinar si el mencionado partido político fomenta y promueve la islamofobia o no. Mediante el análisis del programa político del partido francés, así como el examen de distintas declaraciones de su líder, Marine Le Pen, el presente trabaJo explorará el significado de la islamofobia, la evolución del Frente Nacional y su reciente auge, su postura ante la inmigración y el multiculturalismo, el papel que han Jugado los académicos y periodistas fomentando o no el racismo, y, por último, la reacción de todos éstos ante los ataques.
[Show full text]
En En Report
European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0008/2021 28.1.2021 REPORT on the New Circular Economy Action Plan (2020/2077(INI)) Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Rapporteur: Jan Huitema Rapporteur for the opinion (*): Patrizia Toia, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy Anna Cavazzini, Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection (*) Associated committees ˗ Rule 57 of the Rules of Procedure RR\1223517EN.docx PE652.387v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_INI CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 3 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 29 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY ............ 33 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ......................................................................................................................... 44 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE ................................... 51 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT AND TOURISM .............................. 57 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 66 INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................ 75 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE .................................... 76 PE652.387v03-00 2/76 RR\1223517EN.docx EN MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION on the New Circular Economy Action Plan (2020/2077(INI)) The European
[Show full text]