DOCSLIB.ORG

Lyž.Areál Ještěd-06.01.31

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lyž.Areál Ještěd-06.01.31 Sportovní areál Ještěd (Oznámení dle přílohy č. 4 zákona č. 100/2001 Sb.) Liberec 2006 Oznámení dle přílohy č. 4 zákona č. 100/2001 Sb. Sportovní areál Ještěd Zpracovatel oznámení: RNDr. Petr Anděl, CSc. osvědčení odborné způsobilosti č.j.: 7248/1155/OPV/93 Zpracovatelský tým: RNDr. Petr Anděl, CSc. – hlavní řešitel Ing. Ivana Gorčicová – půda, urbanismus Ing. Lenka Pomališová – ochrana přírody Ing. M. Kryl – lesy Ing. Jiří Pazderský – geologie, hydrogeologie Mgr. Radomír Smetana – hluk, emise Mgr. Richard Višňák, Ph.D. - botanika Ing. Pavel Vonička – zoologie Ing. Dana Potužníková – posouzení vlivů na veřejné zdraví Ing. arch. Jiří Špikla – posouzení průjezdnosti sjezdových tratí Dana Krupková – technické práce Součásti oznámení: Vlastní text oznámení Hluková studie Rozptylová studie Posouzení vlivů na veřejné zdraví Kontaktní adresa na zpracovatele oznámení: EVERNIA s.r.o. Tř. 1. máje 97 460 01 Liberec Tel. 485 228 272 Fax: 485 228 206 Email: [email protected] EVERNIA s.r.o. Strana 2 Oznámení dle přílohy č. 4 zákona č. 100/2001 Sb. Sportovní areál Ještěd OBSAH: ÚVOD.....................................................................................................................................................................5 A. ÚDAJE O OZNAMOVATELI.........................................................................................................................7 B. ÚDAJE O ZÁMĚRU.........................................................................................................................................9 B.I. ZÁKLADNÍ ÚDAJE.........................................................................................................................................9 B.I.1. Název záměru........................................................................................................................................9 B.I.2. Rozsah záměru......................................................................................................................................9 B.I.3. Umístění záměru (kraj, obec, katastrální území)....................................................................................9 B.I.4. Charakter záměru a možnost kumulace s jinými záměry.......................................................................12 B.I.5. Zdůvodnění potřeby záměru a jeho umístění, včetně přehledu zvažovaných variant..............................15 B.I.6. Stručný popis technického a technologického řešení záměru.................................................................16 B.I.7. Posouzení průjezdnosti sjezdových tratí...............................................................................................29 B.I.8. Předpokládaný termín zahájení realizace záměru a jeho dokončení.....................................................34 B.I.9. Výčet dotčených územně samosprávných celků.....................................................................................35 B.II. ÚDAJE O VSTUPECH ..................................................................................................................................36 B.II.1. Zábor půdy.........................................................................................................................................36 B.II.2. Odběr a spotřeba vody.......................................................................................................................39 B.II.3. Surovinové a energetické zdroje.........................................................................................................40 B.II.4. Nároky na dopravní a jinou infrastrukturu..........................................................................................42 B.III. ÚDAJE O VÝSTUPECH ..............................................................................................................................44 B.III.1. Množství a druh emisí do ovzduší......................................................................................................44 B.III.2. Množství a druh odpadních vod.........................................................................................................47 B.III.3. Kategorizace a množství odpadů .......................................................................................................49 B.III.4. Ostatní výstupy.................................................................................................................................50 B.III.5. Terénní úpravy a zásahy do krajiny...................................................................................................56 C. ÚDAJE O STAVU ŽIVOTNÍHO PROSTŘEDÍ V DOTČENÉM ÚZEMÍ....................................................58 C.I. VÝČET NEJZÁVAŽNĚJŠÍCH ENVIRONMENTÁLNÍCH CHARAKTERISTIK DOTČENÉHO ÚZEMÍ ........................58 C.II. STRUČNÁ CHARAKTERISTIKA STAVU SLOŽEK ŽIVOTNÍHO PROSTŘEDÍ V DOTČENÉM ÚZEMÍ, KTERÉ BUDOU PRAVDĚPODOBNĚ VÝZNAMNĚ OVLIVNĚNY........................................................................................................59 C.II.1. Ovzduší a klima..................................................................................................................................59 C.II.2. Voda..................................................................................................................................................62 C.II.3. Půda..................................................................................................................................................69 C.II.4. Horninové prostředí a přírodní zdroje................................................................................................70 C.II.5. Flóra a fauna.....................................................................................................................................73 C.II.6. Ekosystémy........................................................................................................................................95 C.II.7. Krajinný ráz.....................................................................................................................................101 C.II.8. Obyvatelstvo....................................................................................................................................106 C.II.9. Hmotný majetek...............................................................................................................................106 C.II.10. Kulturní a archeologické památky..................................................................................................106 C.III. CELKOVÉ ZHODNOCENÍ KVALITY ŽIVOTNÍHO PROSTŘEDÍ V DOTČENÉM ÚZEMÍ Z HLEDISKA JEHO ÚNOSNÉHO ZATÍŽENÍ ......................................................................................................................................108 D. KOMPLEXNÍ CHARAKTERISTIKA A HODNOCENÍ VLIVU ZÁMĚRU NA OBYVATELSTVO A ŽIVOTNÍ PROSTŘEDÍ....................................................................................................................................110 D.I. CHARAKTERISTIKA MOŽNÝCH VLIVŮ A ODHAD JEJICH VELIKOSTI A VÝZNAMNOSTI ...............................110 D.I.1. Vliv na obyvatelstvo..........................................................................................................................112 D.I.2. Vliv na ovzduší a klima......................................................................................................................120 D.I.3. Vliv na hlukovou situaci....................................................................................................................125 D.I.4. Vliv na povrchové a podzemní vody...................................................................................................133 D.I.5. Vliv na půdu......................................................................................................................................136 D.I.6. Vliv na horninové prostředí a přírodní zdroje....................................................................................136 D.I.7. Vliv na flóru, faunu a ekosystémy......................................................................................................137 D.I.8. Vliv na krajinu..................................................................................................................................145 D.II. HODNOCENÍ PŘIJATELNOSTI ZÁMĚRU Z HLEDISKA CELKOVÉ ÚNOSNOSTI ÚZEMÍ...................................151 D.III. KOMPLEXNÍ CHRAKTERISTIKA VLIVŮ ZÁMĚRU NA ŽIVOTNÍ PROSTŘEDÍ Z HLEDISKA JEJICH VELIKOSTI A VÝZNAMNOSTI A MOŽNOSTI PŘESHRANIČNÍCH VLIVŮ.....................................................................................153 D.IV. CHARAKTERISTIKA ENVIRONMENTÁLNÍCH RIZIK PŘI MOŽNÝCH HAVÁRIÍCH A NESTANDARTNÍCH STAVECH.........................................................................................................................................................155 D.V. OPATŘENÍ K PREVENCI, VYLOUČENÍ, SNÍŽENÍ, POPŘÍPADĚ KOMPENZACI NEPŘÍZNIVÝCH VLIVŮ NA ŽIVOTNÍ PROSTŘEDÍ........................................................................................................................................157 D.V.1. Období přípravy...............................................................................................................................157 D.V.2. Období výstavby a provozu...............................................................................................................157 EVERNIA s.r.o. Strana 3 Oznámení dle přílohy č. 4 zákona č. 100/2001 Sb. Sportovní areál Ještěd D.VI. CHARAKTERISTIKA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 409-456 Rejstriky Olomoucko1
    Bibliografie 1. ALBRECHT, P. (1996–2000): Inventarizaãní prÛzkumy 19. BEZDùâKA, P. (1983): Lesní mravenci na lokalitû Alf- âubernice, Lipovské upolínové louky, Na HÛrkách, rédka. – Na‰í pfiírodou, 2: 18–19, Praha. Pod Pansk˘m lesem, Vitãick˘ les, Za Hrnãífikou. – 20. BEZDùâKA, P. (1998): Mravenci Pfiírodního parku Vel- Depon. in RÎP OkÚ Prostûjov, 25 s., 38 s., 17 s., 15 k˘ Kosífi. – Pfiírodovûdné studie Muzea Prostûjovska, s., 32 s., 25 s., Prostûjov. (nepubl.) 1: 125–132, Prostûjov. 2. ALBRECHT, P. (1998): Krajiny Prostûjovska. – Pfiírodo- 21. BEZDùâKA, P. (1999): V˘voj komplexu hnízd Formica vûdné studie Muzea Prostûjovska, 1: 47–66, Prostûjov. lugubris Zett. v Jeseníkách. – Formica, zpravodaj pro 3. ALBRECHT, P. (1999): Fytocenologické snímky moni- aplikovan˘ v˘zkum a ochranu lesních mravencÛ, 2: torovacích ploch LIPO 02.01 a 02.02. Správa CHKO 65–70, Liberec. Litovelské Pomoraví, 3 s., Olomouc. (nepubl.) 22. BUâEK, A. (1979): Pfiíspûvek k inventarizaci SPR Bu- 4. ALBRECHT, P. (2000): Pfiíspûvek ke kvûtenû nejvy‰‰ích koveãek. MS, práce SOâ pfii SLT· Hranice, 18 s., ãástí Drahanské vrchoviny se zamûfiením na mokfiady. Hranice. – Pfiírodovûdné studie Muzea Prostûjovska, 3: 55–86, 23. BURE·, L., BURE·OVÁ, Z. (1988): âerven˘ seznam cév- Prostûjov. nat˘ch rostlin CHKO Jeseníky. – Zpravodaj âSOP, 3: 5. ANDùRA, M. (1999): âeské názvy ÏivoãichÛ II. Savci 1–28, Bruntál. (Mammalia). Národní muzeum, 148 s., Praha. 24. BURE·, L., BURE·OVÁ, Z. (1989): Velká kotlina, státní 6. ANDùRA, M., HANZAL, V. (1996): Atlas roz‰ífiení sav- pfiírodní rezervace. – PrÛvodce nauãnou stezkou, cÛ v âeské republice. PfiedbûÏná verze. II: ·elmy (Car- âSOP ZO, 44 s., Ostrava. nivora).
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF File (107KB)
    Myrmecological News 15 Digital supplementary material Digital supplementary material to SEPPÄ, P., HELANTERÄ, H., TRONTTI, K., PUNTTILA, P., CHERNENKO, A., MARTIN, S.J. & SUNDSTRÖM, L. 2011: The many ways to delimit species: hairs, genes and surface chemistry. – Myrmecological News 15: 31-41. Appendix 1: Number of hairs on different body parts of Formica fusca and F. lemani according to different authors. Promesonotum & pronotum YARROW COLLINGWOOD DLUSSKY & KUTTER COLLINGWOOD DOUWES CZECHOWSKI & SEIFERT SEIFERT (1954) (1958) PISARSKI (1971) (1977) (1979) (1995) al. (2002) (1996) (2007) F. fusca < 3 at most 2 - 3 ≤ 2 usually 0, usually = 0, ≤ 2 usually 0, rarely average average sometimes occasion. 1 - 2 1 - 5 < 1 0 - 0.8 1 - 4 F. lemani numerous numerous some ind. >10, up to 20 "with erect ≥ 3 > 6 average average in SE-Europ. popu- hairs" > 1 1.2 - 13.5 lations, most ind. 0 Femora F. fusca mid = 0 mid = 0 mid = 0 mid ≤ 1 fore = 2 - 3 hind = 0 hind = 0 mid = rarely 1 - 2 F. lemani mid = "long all = "hairy" mid = a few mid ≥ 2 fore = 3 - 12 hairs" hind = a few mid = 3 - 17 References COLLINGWOOD, C.A. 1958: A key to the species of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) found in Britain. – Transactions of the Society for British Entomology 13: 69-96. COLLINGWOOD, C.A. 1979: The Formicidae (Hymenoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. – Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 8: 1-174. CZECHOWSKI, W., RADCHENKO, A. & CZECHOWSKA, W. 2002: The ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) of Poland. – Museum and Insti- tute of Zoology PAS, Warszawa, 200 pp. DLUSSKY, G.M. & PISARSKI, B. 1971: Rewizja polskich gatunków mrówek (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) z rodzaju Formica L.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Wood Ants of the UK
    Guide to the Wood Ants of the UK and related species © Stewart Taylor © Stewart Taylor Wood Ants of the UK This guide is aimed at anyone who wants to learn more about mound-building woodland ants in the UK and how to identify the three ‘true’ Wood Ant species: Southern Red Wood Ant, Scottish Wood Ant and Hairy Wood Ant. The Blood-red Ant and Narrow-headed Ant (which overlap with the Wood Ants in their appearance, habitat and range) are also included here. The Shining Guest Ant is dependent on Wood Ants for survival so is included in this guide to raise awareness of this tiny and overlooked species. A further related species, Formica pratensis is not included in this guide. It has been considered extinct on mainland Britain since 2005 and is now only found on Jersey and Guernsey in the British Isles. Funding by CLIF, National Parks Protectors Published by the Cairngorms National Park Authority © CNPA 2021. All rights reserved. Contents What are Wood Ants? 02 Why are they important? 04 The Wood Ant calendar 05 Colony establishment and life cycle 06 Scottish Wood Ant 08 Hairy Wood Ant 09 Southern Red Wood Ant 10 Blood-red Ant 11 Narrow-headed Ant 12 Shining Guest Ant 13 Comparison between Shining Guest Ant and Slender Ant 14 Where to find Wood Ants 15 Nest mounds 18 Species distributions 19 Managing habitat for wood ants 22 Survey techniques and monitoring 25 Recording Wood Ants 26 Conservation status of Wood Ants 27 Further information 28 01 What are Wood Ants? Wood Ants are large, red and brown-black ants and in Europe most species live in woodland habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Phylogenetic Evaluation of Associations Between Microdontinae (Diptera: Syrphidae) and Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2013, Article ID 538316, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/538316 Review Article Review and Phylogenetic Evaluation of Associations between Microdontinae (Diptera: Syrphidae) and Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Menno Reemer Naturalis Biodiversity Center, European Invertebrate Survey, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Correspondence should be addressed to Menno Reemer; [email protected] Received 11 February 2013; Accepted 21 March 2013 Academic Editor: Jean-Paul Lachaud Copyright © 2013 Menno Reemer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The immature stages of hoverflies of the subfamily Microdontinae (Diptera: Syrphidae) develop in ant nests, as predators ofthe ant brood. The present paper reviews published and unpublished records of associations of Microdontinae with ants, in order to discuss the following questions. (1) Are all Microdontinae associated with ants? (2) Are Microdontinae associated with all ants? (3) Are particular clades of Microdontinae associated with particular clades of ants? (4) Are Microdontinae associated with other insects? A total number of 109 associations between the groups are evaluated, relating to 43 species of Microdontinae belonging to 14 genera, and to at least 69 species of ants belonging to 24 genera and five subfamilies. The taxa of Microdontinae found in association with ants occur scattered throughout their phylogenetic tree. One of the supposedly most basal taxa (Mixogaster)isassociatedwith ants, suggesting that associations with ants evolved early in the history of the subfamily and have remained a predominant feature of their lifestyle.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): Distribution, Conservation and Functional Relationships
    Irish Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): Distribution, Conservation and Functional Relationships Submitted by: Dipl. Biol. Robin Niechoj Supervisor: Prof. John Breen Submitted in accordance with the academic requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Limerick Limerick, April 2011 Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis and that it has not been submitted for any other academic award. References and acknowledgements have been made, where necessary, to the work of others. Signature: Date: Robin Niechoj Department of Life Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Limerick ii Acknowledgements/Danksagung I wish to thank: Dr. John Breen for his supervision, encouragement and patience throughout the past 5 years. His infectious positive attitude towards both work and life was and always will be appreciated. Dr. Kenneth Byrne and Dr. Mogens Nielsen for accepting to examine this thesis, all the CréBeo team for advice, corrections of the report and Dr. Olaf Schmidt (also) for verification of the earthworm identification, Dr. Siobhán Jordan and her team for elemental analyses, Maria Long and Emma Glanville (NPWS) for advice, Catherine Elder for all her support, including fieldwork and proof reading, Dr. Patricia O’Flaherty and John O’Donovan for help with the proof reading, Robert Hutchinson for his help with the freeze-drying, and last but not least all the staff and postgraduate students of the Department of Life Sciences for their contribution to my work. Ich möchte mich bedanken bei: Katrin Wagner für ihre Hilfe im Labor, sowie ihre Worte der Motivation.
    [Show full text]
  • F Auna Bohemiae Septentrionalis T Omus 41
    FAUNA BOHEMIAE SEPTENTRIONALIS TOMUS 41/2016 SBORNÍK ODBORNÝCH PRACÍ ZOOLOGICKÉHO KLUBU, Z. S. A ZOOLOGICKÉ ZAHRADY ÚSTÍ NAD LABEM, P. O. FAUNA BOHEMIAE SEPTENTRIONALIS ABREVITATIO BIBLIOGRAPHICA: FAUNA BOHEMIAE SEPTENTRIONALIS ISSN 0231-9861 TOMUS 41 2016 Sborník odborných prací Sborník FBS 41 je věnován vzpomínce Zoologického klubu, z. s. a Zoologické zahrady Ústí nad Labem, p. o. na pana Herberta TICHÉHO, Fauna Bohemiae septentrionalis dlouholetého člena ZK, Tomus 41, 2016 Náklad 200 kusů který zemřel po dlouhé nemoci Sazba a zajištění tisku: Jasnet, spol. s r. o., Moskevská 1365/3, 400 01 Ústí nad Labem 12. listopadu 2017 ve věku 82 let. Redakční rada: Ing. Věra Vrabcová, Pavlína Slámová Překlad: NaturTranslations Za věcnou správnost příspěvků odpovídají autoři. Uzávěrka dalšího sborníku je 30. 6. 2018 Vydala Zoo Ústí nad Labem za podpory Ministerstva životního prostředí ČR Ministerstvo životního prostředí České republiky 5 OBSAH ZVÍŘATA CHOVANÁ V ZOO ÚSTÍ NAD LABEM K 31.12.2016 7 ORNITOLOGICKÁ POZOROVÁNÍ V ÚSTECKÉM KRAJI V ROCE 2016 79 CAPACITY OF ANIMALS AT THE USTI NAD LABEM ZOO BY 31.12.2016 RARE SIGHTINGS IN 2016 Jiří Vondráček ČINNOST ZOOLOGICKÉHO KLUBU V ROCE 2016 13 ACTIVITIES OF THE ZOOLOGICAL CLUB IN 2016 PŮVODNOST ŽELVY BAHENNÍ NA SEVERNÍ MORAVĚ Věra Vrabcová (S PŘIHLÉDNUTÍM K OKOLÍ MĚSTA OSTRAVY) 95 THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE EUROPEAN POND TURTLE (EMYS ORBICULARIS) IN NORTHERN MORAVIA (WITH CONSIDERATION TO ENVIRONMENT FAUNA ČESKÉHO ŠVÝCARSKA 17 OF THE TOWN OSTRAVA) THE FAUNA OF THE BOHEMIAN SWITZERLAND Jiří J. Hudeček Pavel
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Social Parasitism in Formica Ants Revealed by a Global Phylogeny – Supplementary Figures, Tables, and References
    The evolution of social parasitism in Formica ants revealed by a global phylogeny – Supplementary figures, tables, and references Marek L. Borowiec Stefan P. Cover Christian Rabeling 1 Supplementary Methods Data availability Trimmed reads generated for this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (to be submit­ ted upon publication). Detailed voucher collection information, assembled sequences, analyzed matrices, configuration files and output of all analyses, and code used are available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zen­ odo.4341310). Taxon sampling For this study we gathered samples collected in the past ~60 years which were available as either ethanol­ preserved or point­mounted specimens. Taxon sampling comprises 101 newly sequenced ingroup morphos­ pecies from all seven species groups of Formica ants Creighton (1950) that were recognized prior to our study and 8 outgroup species. Our sampling was guided by previous taxonomic and phylogenetic work Creighton (1950); Francoeur (1973); Snelling and Buren (1985); Seifert (2000, 2002, 2004); Goropashnaya et al. (2004, 2012); Trager et al. (2007); Trager (2013); Seifert and Schultz (2009a,b); Muñoz­López et al. (2012); Antonov and Bukin (2016); Chen and Zhou (2017); Romiguier et al. (2018) and included represen­ tatives from both the New and the Old World. Collection data associated with sequenced samples can be found in Table S1. Molecular data collection and sequencing We performed non­destructive extraction and preserved same­specimen vouchers for each newly sequenced sample. We re­mounted all vouchers, assigned unique specimen identifiers (Table S1), and deposited them in the ASU Social Insect Biodiversity Repository (contact: Christian Rabeling, [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • The Coexistence
    Myrmecological News 15 31-41 Online Earlier, for print 2011 The many ways to delimit species: hairs, genes and surface chemistry Perttu SEPPÄ, Heikki HELANTERÄ, Kalevi TRONTTI, Pekka PUNTTILA, Anton CHERNENKO, Stephen J. MARTIN & Liselotte SUNDSTRÖM Abstract Species identification forms the basis for understanding the diversity of the living world, but it is also a prerequisite for understanding many evolutionary patterns and processes. The most promising approach for correctly delimiting and identifying species is to integrate many types of information in the same study. Our aim was to test how cuticular hydro- carbons, traditional morphometrics, genetic polymorphisms in nuclear markers (allozymes and DNA microsatellites) and DNA barcoding (partial mitochondrial COI gene) perform in delimiting species. As an example, we used two closely related Formica ants, F. fusca and F. lemani, sampled from a sympatric population in the northern part of their distribu- tion. Morphological characters vary and overlap in different parts of their distribution areas, but cuticular hydrocarbons include a strong taxonomic signal and our aim is to test the degree to which morphological and genetic data correspond to the chemical data. In the morphological analysis, species were best separated by the combined number of hairs on pro- notum and mesonotum, but individual workers overlapped in hair numbers, as previously noted by several authors. Nests of the two species were separated but not clustered according to species in a Principal Component Analysis made on nuclear genetic data. However, model-based Bayesian clustering resulted in perfect separation of the species and gave no indication of hybridization. Furthermore, F. lemani and F.
    [Show full text]
  • First Observation of an Ant Colony Of
    Alpine Entomology 5 2021, 23–26 | DOI 10.3897/alpento.5.67037 First observation of an ant colony of Formica fuscocinerea Forel, 1874 invaded by the social parasite F. truncorum Fabricius, 1804 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Rainer Neumeyer1, Jürg Sommerhalder2, Stefan Ungricht3 1 Luegislandstrasse 56, 8051 Zürich, Switzerland 2 Längimoosstrasse 11, 8309 Nürensdorf, Switzerland 3 ETH-Zentrum, Gebäude NO, Büro DO 39, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland http://zoobank.org/90CA22B2-A9EA-43E1-93B4-132D57C57B0A Corresponding author: Rainer Neumeyer ([email protected]) Academic editor: Stefan Schmidt ♦ Received 6 April 2021 ♦ Accepted 16 May 2021 ♦ Published 2 June 2021 Abstract In the northern Alps of Switzerland we observed a mixed ant colony of Formica truncorum Fabricius, 1804 and F. fuscocinerea Forel, 1874 at the foot of a schoolhouse wall in the built-up centre of the small town of Näfels (canton of Glarus). Based on the fact that the habitat is favorable only for F. fuscocinerea and that F. truncorum is a notorious temporary social parasite, we conclude that in this case a colony of F. fuscocinerea must have been usurped by F. truncorum. This is remarkable, as it is the first reported case where a colony of F. fuscocinerea has been taken over by a social parasite. We consider the observed unusually small workers of F. truncorum to be a starvation form. This is probably due to the suboptimal urban nest site, as this species typically occurs along the edge of forests or in clearings. Key Words Central Europe, northern Alps, social insects, temporary social parasitism, urban ecology Introduction ing phase of the parasite colony ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Ant Pollination in Two Orchid Species in the Alps As Adaptation to the Climate of the Alpine Zone?
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320283162 Significant ant pollination in two orchid species in the Alps as adaptation to the climate of the alpine zone? Signifikante Bestäubung zweier Orchideenarten in den Alpen als Anpass... Article in TUEXENIA · September 2017 DOI: 10.14471/2017.37.005 CITATION READS 1 178 2 authors: Jean Claessens Bernhard Seifert Naturalis Biodiversity Center Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiver… 70 PUBLICATIONS 204 CITATIONS 195 PUBLICATIONS 3,736 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: The invasive garden ant, Lasius neglectus, in Hungary View project Pollination videos View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jean Claessens on 09 October 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Tuexenia 37: 363–374. Göttingen 2017. doi: 10.14471/2017.37.005, available online at www.tuexenia.de SHORT COMMUNICATION Significant ant pollination in two orchid species in the Alps as adaptation to the climate of the alpine zone? Signifikante Bestäubung zweier Orchideenarten in den Alpen als Anpassung an das Klima der alpinen Zone? Jean Claessens1, * & Bernhard Seifert2 1Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Vondellaan 55, 2332 AA Leiden, Netherlands; 2Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, Am Museum 1, 02826 Görlitz, Germany *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Ants were shown to be significant pollinators of two orchid species in the alpine zone of the Alps. Repeated observations from several localities confirm the ant Formica lemani as pollinator of Chamor- chis alpina whereas Formica exsecta is reported here for the first time as pollinator of Dactylorhiza viridis.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Hungary: Survey of Ant Species with an Annotated Synonymic Inventory
    insects Article The Myrmecofauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Hungary: Survey of Ant Species with an Annotated Synonymic Inventory Sándor Cs˝osz 1,2, Ferenc Báthori 2,László Gallé 3,Gábor L˝orinczi 4, István Maák 4,5, András Tartally 6,* , Éva Kovács 7, Anna Ágnes Somogyi 6 and Bálint Markó 8,9 1 MTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research Group, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117 Budapest, Hungary; [email protected] 2 Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, 2163 Vácrátót, Hungary; [email protected] 3 Department of Ecology and Natural History Collection, University of Szeged, Szeged Boldogasszony sgt. 17., 6722 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] 4 Department of Ecology, University of Szeged, Közép fasor 52, 6726 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] (G.L.); [email protected] (I.M.) 5 Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warsaw, Poland 6 Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary; [email protected] 7 Kiskunság National Park Directorate, Liszt F. u. 19, 6000 Kecskemét, Hungary; [email protected] 8 Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Babe¸s-BolyaiUniversity, Clinicilor 5-7, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; [email protected] 9 Centre for Systems Biology, Biodiversity and Bioresources, Babes, -Bolyai University, Clinicilor 5-7, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-52-512-900 (ext. 62349) Simple Summary: Abundance is a hallmark of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). They are exceed- ingly common in both natural and artificial environments and they constitute a conspicuous part Citation: Cs˝osz,S.; Báthori, F.; Gallé, of the terrestrial ecosystem; every 3 to 4 out of 10 kg of insects are given by ants.
    [Show full text]
  • Microdon Rhenanus and Microdon Eggeri Var. Major
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Volucella - Die Schwebfliegen-Zeitschrift Jahr/Year: 2004 Band/Volume: 7 Autor(en)/Author(s): Schmid Ulrich Artikel/Article: Microdon rhenanus and Microdon eggeri var. major (Diptera, Syrphidae) revisited 111-124 ©Volucella; Dieter Doczkal (München) und Ulrich Schmid (Stuttgart), download www.zobodat.at 110 VOLUCELLA 7, 2004 Schmid: Microdon rhenanus / Microdon eggeri var. major 111 Microdon rhenanus and Microdon eggeri var. major (Diptera, Syrphidae) revisited Ulrich Schmid Schmid, U. (2004): Microdon rhenanus and Microdon eggeri var. major (Diptera, Syrphidae) revisited. – Volucella 7, 111-124. Stuttgart. In the light of the description of Microdon myrmicae Schönrogge et al. 2002, a sibling species of M. mutabilis (Linnaeus, 1758) only separable on features of the developmental stages, Microdon rhenanus Andries, 1912 and Microdon eggeri var. major Andries, 1912 are re-examined. A lectotype is designated for M. rhenanus and a neotype for M. eggeri var. major. The identity of both taxa is discussed. M. rhenanus is still regarded as a junior synonym of M. mutabilis (L.) sensu Schönrogge et al. but argument is presented that M. eggeri var. major represents a distinct species Microdon major Andries, 1912 stat. nov., which is associated with ants of the genus Formica, while M. analis (Macquart, 1842) s.str. (= M. eggeri Mik), as interpreted here, is as- sociated with Lasius species. Information is provided on recognition of the puparia of these taxa. Further investigations on habitat, ant associations and identification of imagines are necessary. The first records of M. myrmicae from Germany are given.
    [Show full text]