DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Outline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Outline Municipal Partnerships for Violence Prevention in Central America and the Dominican Republic Quarterly Report XXXV April-June 2018 Submission Date: July 2018 International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Cooperative Agreement Award No. RLA-A-00-09-00050-00 Prepared for the U.S. Agency for International Development Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean Office of Regional and Sustainable Development July 2008 1 Chris Strom Agreement Officer’s Technical Representative USAID/W/LAC/RSD/DHR USAID 1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20523 Subject: Cooperative Agreement Award No. LAG-A-00-98-00060-00 Municipal Partnerships for Violence Prevention in Central America and the Dominican Republic Dear Mr. Strom, In compliance with 22 CFR 226.51 (d), Monitoring and reporting program performance, ICMA is pleased to submit the following report for the subject cooperative agreement. • Quarterly Report XXXV – April-June 2018 If you have further questions about the technical content of these reports, please contact me directly. For administrative matters, please contact Cintya Renderos at (202) 962-3692. For contractual matters, please contact Ms. Irene Kaushansky (202) 962-3526. Sincerely, Isabelle Bully-Omictin, ICMA Regional Director, Latin America/Caribbean TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................... 4 I. Project Description/Introduction ................................................................... 6 1.1 Major accomplishments/ progress towards results .......................................................... 8 a. Summary of trips in current Reporting Period: April-June 2018 ................................... 8 b. Accomplishments by Objective ............................................................................................. 9 1. Strategic Objective 1: Promote comprehensive municipal-based violence prevention strategies and programs with key Central American stakeholders and foster development of regional peer knowledge networks ................................................................................. 9 a. Intermediate Result 1.1: Orientation and information provided to local government, law enforcement, and civil society representatives on municipal-based violence prevention ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 b. Intermediate Result 1.2: Regional peer network(s) established and municipal coordination mechanisms strengthened. .................................................................................................... 11 2. Strategic Objective 2: Support comprehensive municipal-based violence and crime prevention programs in select municipalities ................................................................... 12 a. Intermediate Result 2: Training and technical assistance provided to pilot local governments and community groups, in coordination with national police efforts and other municipal-based programs ................................................................................................... 12 II. implementation Challenges/ Remedial Actions Taken ............................ 17 III. Proposed Activities and Expected Results for Next Quarter- July-September 2018 ................................................................................................................... 17 V. MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE .................................................. 18 IV. ANNEX: A ....................................................................................................... 19 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AGAAI Municipal Association of Indigenous Authorities and Mayors ANAM Guatemalan Municipal Association AMHON Municipal Association of Honduras AMUPA Association of Municipalities of Panama AMUPREV Municipal Partnerships for Violence Prevention in Central America and the Dominican Republic ASOMUREO Association of Municipalities of the Osama Region CAMCAYCA Confederation of Associations of Central America and the Caribbean CMPC Municipal Committee for Peace and Coexistence (Spanish acronym) COMUPREV Commission for the Prevention of Violence CPSVFLM Committee for the Prevention of Social Violence and Municipal Leadership Strengthening FEDOMU Federation of Municipalities of the Dominican Republic FUNADEH Foundation for the Development of Honduras GIZ German Cooperation Agency GRYD City of Los Angeles Gang Reduction and Youth Development ICMA International City/County Management Association MINED Ministry of Education (Dominican Republic) MVPC Municipal Violence Prevention Committee PETTP Special Solicitor for Trafficking in Persons PMIAJ – COMVIDA Municipal Infant, Adolescent and Youth Programs – Communications and Life POA Annual Operating Plan PREPAZ Salvadoran Ministry of Justice and Public Security’s Office on Social Violence Prevention and Peace Culture SESEG State Security Secretariat (Brazil) SICA Central American Integration System PREVJUVE Comprehensive security and prevention of violence affecting children, adolescents and youth in SICA countries SICA Integrated Central American System SVPC Social Violence Prevention Committee TIP Trafficking in Persons UNAH National Autonomous University of Honduras UNGL National Union of Local Governments of Costa Rica UPP Police Pacification Unit (Brazil) USAID U.S Agency for International Development VNG Dutch Cooperation Agency ZMVS Metropolitan Zone of the Sula Valley I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/INTRODUCTION ICMA has designed a program that began on October 1, 2009 which focuses on two key objectives: (1) to promote comprehensive municipal-based violence prevention strategies and programs with key Central American stakeholders and foster development of regional peer knowledge networks; and (2) to provide training and technical assistance to local governments and community groups, in coordination with national police efforts and other municipal-based programs. ICMA has worked with key institutions in the region to promote the first objective and engage in outreach. We developed a Toolkit for municipalities to use to promote the creation of municipal-led mechanisms to provide leadership in bringing together key stakeholders to design and implement crime and violence prevention programs. We have facilitated the participation of experts in national, regional and international conferences and conducted workshops for municipal associations and municipal stakeholders. We have developed a website (www.amuprev.org) which showcases daily examples of municipalities throughout Latin America, which are taking the initiative to develop programs that are building the foundation for crime prevention in their communities. Furthermore, we have documented via video the experiences of 10 municipalities in Central America which have demonstrated a commitment to crime prevention through the leadership of their elected officials, the dedication of their police forces and the collaboration of representatives from all sectors of civil society, as well as national government agencies. We have shared these videos through our website and at events and workshops throughout the Region. To accomplish Objective 2, ICMA has implemented the Toolkit in nineteen (19) municipalities to create and/or strengthen municipal violence prevention committees/commissions (MVPCs) and engaged in a series of municipal partnerships with cities in the US to share the model of community-oriented policing and governance with the following municipalities in Central America: Colón, San Miguelito, and Panama City, Panama; Nahuizalco, Sonsonate, Suchitoto, San José Guayabal and San Bartolomé Perulapía, El Salvador; Mixco, Palencia, Santa Catarina Pinula, Cobán, San Juan Chamelco and Tactic, Guatemala; Villanueva, San Manuel and Pimienta, Honduras and Boca Chica and Santo Domingo Este, Dominican Republic. Through these partnerships, police officers, municipal staff, community and private sector representatives from US cities have provided information, training and technical assistance to their counterparts to bring about a greater awareness of the need to prioritize and act upon violence and crime prevention programs in a coordinated and comprehensive fashion. The lessons-learned and knowledge gained from the municipal partnerships have been shared with the broader network through the AMUPREV website. ICMA has also provided support to municipal associations in each of the countries where we have had direct municipal interventions (the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and Panama) as well as Costa Rica in order to promote the sharing of information and replication of the methodology. In September 2012, USAID issued a six-month extension to ICMA through March 29, 2013. Subsequently, USAID issued a no-cost extension to ICMA through April 30, 2013 and another cost extension through September 30, 2013. ICMA applied the tools and methodologies tested throughout the first Phase of this Cooperative Agreement to new municipalities in Guatemala and El Salvador; provided continuing support to the Municipal Crime and Violence Prevention Committees of Mixco, Palencia and Santa Catarina Pinula, Guatemala and Nahuizalco and Sonsonate, El Salvador; continued to share information and practices with its established network of violence prevention and other interested practitioners in the Region; developed a sustainability plan to maintain the network after project end; and facilitated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Bank Document
    Report No. 3312-HO FILE COPY Current Economic Memorandum on Honduras Public Disclosure Authorized July 17, 1981 Latin America and the Caribbean Regional Office FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS US$1.00 = 2.00 Lempiras (L) L 1.00 = US$0.50 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ANACH National Association of Honduran Peasants BANADESA National Agricultural Development Bank BANASUPRO National Development Bank Food Marketing Agency BNF National Development Bank CABEI Central American Bank for Economic Integration CACM Central American Common Market COHBANA Honduran Banana Corporation COHDEFOR National Forestry Corporation CONADI National Investment Corporation CORFINO Olancho Industrial Forestry Corporation CONSUPLANE National Planning Council DIMA Municipal Water Division of San Pedro Sula EACI Isletas Cooperative of Banana Growers ENEE National Electric Power Company ENP National Port Authority FAO U.N. Food and Agricultural Organization FECORAH Federation of Agrarian Reform Cooperatives FIAFSA Agua Fria Industrial Forestry Corporation FINAVI National Housing Financiera FNP National Railway Company FONDEI National Industrial Development Fund HONDUTEL Honduran Telecommunications Corporation IDB Inter-American Development Bank IHSS Social Security Institute IJPM National Retirement Fund for Teachers INA National Agrarian Institute INVA National Housing Institute JNBS National Social Welfare Board JUPEMP National Retirement Fund for Public Employees LNB National Lottery PANI National Child Welfare Institute PRODERO Western Rural Development Project SANAA National Water and Sewerage Service UNAH National University UNC National Union of Peasants USAID U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Comunicado #77
    COMUNICADO #77 El Gobierno de la República de Honduras, a través del Sistema Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos (SINAGER), informa a la población lo siguiente: En cumplimiento con el compromiso de comunicar oportunamente la evolución de la pandemia de COVID-19 en el país, se informa que se realizaron 715 nuevas pruebas para diagnosticar el virus, de las cuales 266 dieron resultado POSITIVO sumando así un total de 3,743 casos de COVID-19 a nivel nacional, distribuyéndose los nuevos casos de la siguiente manera: 1. Paciente 3478 Niño 10 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 2. Paciente 3479 Mujer 49 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 3. Paciente 3480 Hombre 39 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 4. Paciente 3481 Hombre 65 años El Porvenir, Francisco Morazán 5. Paciente 3482 Hombre 33 años San Francisco, La Paz 6. Paciente 3483 Hombre 60 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 7. Paciente 3484 Hombre 72 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 8. Paciente 3485 Mujer 66 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 9. Paciente 3486 Mujer 61 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 10. Paciente 3487 Hombre 27 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 11. Paciente 3488 Niño 3 años El Progreso, Yoro 12. Paciente 3489 Hombre 28 años El Progreso, Yoro 13. Paciente 3490 Hombre 19 años El Progreso, Yoro 14. Paciente 3491 Hombre 23 años El Progreso, Yoro 15. Paciente 3492 Hombre 51 años El Progreso, Yoro 1 16. Paciente 3493 Hombre 44 años El Progreso, Yoro 17. Paciente 3494 Mujer 24 años El Progreso, Yoro 18. Paciente 3495 Hombre 20 años El Progreso, Yoro 19. Paciente 3496 Mujer 28 años El Progreso, Yoro 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Environment Partnership with Central America
    ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT PARTNERSHIP WITH CENTRAL AMERICA CENTRAL AMERICAN BIOPOWER PROJECT STAGE I PROJECT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................5 2. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION......................................................................................................6 3. PRELIMINARY STUDY .................................................................................................................7 3.1 COUNTRY STUDIES.............................................................................................................7 3.1.1 Nicaragua ................................................................................................................................7 3.1.2 Honduras ..............................................................................................................................13 3.1.3 Guatemala.............................................................................................................................19 3.2 SITE VISITS ............................................................................................................................23 3.2.1 Nicaragua ..............................................................................................................................23 3.2.2 Honduras ..............................................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Comunicado #81
    COMUNICADO #81 El Gobierno de la República de Honduras, a través del Sistema Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos (SINAGER), informa a la población lo siguiente: En cumplimiento con el compromiso de comunicar oportunamente la evolución de la pandemia de COVID-19 en el país, se informa que se realizaron 616 nuevas pruebas para diagnosticar el virus, de las cuales 239 dieron resultado POSITIVO sumando así un total de 4,640 casos de COVID-19 a nivel nacional, distribuyéndose los nuevos casos de la siguiente manera: 1. Paciente 4402 Hombre 41 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 2. Paciente 4403 Hombre 63 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 3. Paciente 4404 Un Bebé recién nacido Santa Rita, Yoro 4. Paciente 4405 Mujer 27 años Santa Rita, Yoro 5. Paciente 4406 Mujer 36 años El Progreso, Yoro 6. Paciente 4407 Hombre 25 años El Progreso, Yoro 7. Paciente 4408 Hombre 40 años El Progreso, Yoro 8. Paciente 4409 Mujer 25 años El Progreso, Yoro 9. Paciente 4410 Niño 10 años El Progreso, Yoro 10. Paciente 4411 Mujer 70 años El Progreso, Yoro 11. Paciente 4412 Mujer 56 años El Progreso, Yoro 12. Paciente 4413 Hombre 54 años El Progreso, Yoro 13. Paciente 4414 Niño 10 años El Progreso, Yoro 14. Paciente 4415 Niña 9 años El Progreso, Yoro 15. Paciente 4416 Niño 7 años El Progreso, Yoro 16. Paciente 4417 Niño 14 años El Progreso, Yoro 17. Paciente 4418 Mujer 76 años El Progreso, Yoro 18. Paciente 4419 Hombre 36 años El Progreso, Yoro 19. Paciente 4420 Mujer 47 años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 20.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL GW Report-Choloma.Doc PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
    GROUNDWATER RESOURCES MONITORING REPORT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Choloma, Republic of Honduras, C. A. June 2002 Prepared for: Consultant: United States Agency for International Development Sub-Consultant: 2701 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Tel: (916) 444-0123 Fax: (916) 635-8805 www.brownandcaldwell.com July 25, 2002 Ing. Mauricio Cruz Chief Technical Officer Agencia de los Estados Unidos para el Desarrollo Internacional Frente a la Embajada Americana Avenida La Paz, Post Office Box 3453 Tegucigalpa, M.D.C., Honduras Subject: Groundwater Resources Monitoring Report and Management Plan, Choloma, Honduras, Contract No. 522-C-00-01-00287-00 Dear Ing. Cruz: In accordance with the above referenced contract, Brown and Caldwell is pleased to forward two copies of the English version of the Groundwater Resources Monitoring Report and Management Plan for Choloma, Honduras. The Spanish language version of this report is being submitted separately. Each report includes the electronic file of the report and the Water Resources Management System on two separate compact disks. The submittal of this report and the reports for Utila, La Lima, Villanueva, and Limón de la Cerca complete our work under this contract. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service to USAID. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (925) 210-2278. Sincerely, BROWN AND CALDWELL Jeff Nelson, P.E. Project Director P:\21000\21143\Report\Choloma Report\Final Cover Letter.doc Signatures of principal personnel responsible for development and execution of this report. Jeff Nelson, P.E. Project Director Horacio Juarez, P.E. Project Manager Paul Selsky, P.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Comunicado #98
    COMUNICADO #98 El Gobierno de la República de Honduras, a través del Sistema Nacional de Gestión de Riesgos (SINAGER), informa a la población lo siguiente: En cumplimiento con el compromiso de comunicar oportunamente la evolución de la pandemia de COVID-19 en el país, se informa que se realizaron 1,114 nuevas pruebas para diagnosticar el virus, de las cuales 323 dieron resultado POSITIVO sumando así un total de 8,455 casos de COVID-19 a nivel nacional, distribuyéndose los nuevos casos de la siguiente manera: 1. Paciente 8133 Hombre 78 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 2. Paciente 8134 Mujer 45 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 3. Paciente 8135 Hombre 40 Años Tocoa, Colón 4. Paciente 8136 Hombre 43 Años Tocoa, Colón 5. Paciente 8137 Una Joven 15 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 6. Paciente 8138 Hombre 21 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 7. Paciente 8139 Una Bebé 3Meses Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 8. Paciente 8140 Niño 6 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 9. Paciente 8141 Hombre 28 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 10. Paciente 8142 Hombre 56 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 11. Paciente 8143 Hombre 37 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 12. Paciente 8144 Hombre 22 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 13. Paciente 8145 Hombre 30 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 14. Paciente 8146 Mujer 46 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 15. Paciente 8147 Hombre 71 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 1 16. Paciente 8148 Mujer 25 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 17. Paciente 8149 Mujer 72 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 18. Paciente 8150 Hombre 66 Años Distrito Central, Francisco Morazán 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Boletín Informativo 1
    INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ANDPROMOTION Newsletter No. IV Members of the Diplomatic body and International Organizations inspected the damage caused from Eta and Iota in the Sula Valley The ambassadors of Chile, European Union, Taiwan, Spain, Brazil, Germany and Japan carried out an aerial tour, to verify on site the damage left by the storms Eta and Iota in the Sula valley. The representatives of countries and organizations that want to USAID cooperate, observed the damage made in municipalities of Villanueva, Potrerillos, Pimienta, San Manuel and Choloma; also the suburbs of La Planeta, Céleo Gonzales, Rivera Hernández, Chamelecón of the city of San Pedro Sula. Secretary of foreign affairs Lisandro Rosales accompanied the diplomats, who visited different zones of the department of Cortés, where they evidenced the damage that occurred and the work that is being done for the reconstruction. In the previous bulletin it was reported about the X-ray that President Juan Orlando Hernández, exposed on the situation in the country and the need for humanitarian aid and initiation of reconstruction efforts. “It is sad that the most productive area of the country and the most important industrial zone of Central America is affected in this way”, lamented, the Secretary. Joint Task Force-Bravo |cancilleriaHN USAID assigned USD 8.5 million dollars in humanitarian aid for Honduras The United States Government through the USAID Humanitarian Assistance Office, since the beginning of the disasters left by storms Eta and Iota, has been working hand in hand with strategic partners to provide food, hygiene supplies, blankets, water and other relief “Helping those in need is a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    A COUNTRY FRAMEWORK REPORT PUBLIC-PRIVATE Private Solutions for Infrastructure in Honduras P THE WORLD BANK INFRASTRUCTURE r i ADVISORY FACILITY v a 36053 t e Public Disclosure Authorized 1818 H Street, NW PPIAF Program S Management Unit o Washington, DC 20433 USA l u c/o The World Bank t Telephone: 202.473.1000 i o Facsimile: 202.477.6391 1818 H Street, NW, MSN I9-907 n s Washington, DC 20433 USA Internet: www.worldbank.org f Telephone: 202.458.5588 o PrivatePrivate SolutionsSolutions E-mail: [email protected] r I Facsimile: 202.522.7466 n f Internet: www.ppiaf.org r a forfor InfrastructureInfrastructure E-mail: [email protected] s t r Public Disclosure Authorized u c t u inin HondurasHonduras r e i n H o n d u r a s Public Disclosure Authorized THE WORLD BANK Public Disclosure Authorized PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ™xHSKIMBy353660zv":&:.:':< ADVISORY FACILITY ISBN 0-8213-5366-7 THE WORLD BANK Private Solutions for Infrastructure in Honduras Private Solutions for Infrastructure in Honduras A Country Framework Report The Public–Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility and the World Bank Group Copyright © 2003 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of The International Bank for Reconstruction the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Execu- and Development/ tive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, NW The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in Washington, DC 20433 this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of Telephone 202-473-1000 the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorse- Internet www.worldbank.org ment or acceptance of such boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood-Hazard Mapping in Honduras in Response to Hurricane Mitch
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S Agency for International Development Flood-Hazard Mapping in Honduras in Response to Hurricane Mitch Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4277 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Flood-Hazard Mapping in Honduras in Response to Hurricane Mitch By Mark C. Mastin U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4277 Prepared in cooperation with U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Tacoma, Washington 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services 1201 Pacific Avenue – Suite 600 Building 810 Tacoma, Washington 98402 Box 25286, Federal Center http://wa.water.usgs.gov http://wa.water.usgs.gov Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PEM Santa Cruz De Yojoa
    Plan de Emergencia Municipal Municipio de Santa Cruz de Yojoa Departamento de Cortés Marzo, 2017 REPÚBLICA DE HONDURAS COMISIÓN PERMANENTE DE CONTINGENCIAS (COPECO) CRÉDITO AIF No. 5190-HN PROYECTO GESTIÓN DE RIESGOS DE DESASTRES CONTENIDO CONTENIDO ....................................................................................................................................... 2 SIGLAS Y ACRÓNIMOS ........................................................................................................................ 8 1. INTRODUCCIÓN ........................................................................................................................ 10 1.1. OBJETIVOS ...................................................................................................................................... 12 OBJETIVO GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 12 OBJETIVOS ESPECÍFICOS ................................................................................................................... 12 1.2. ALCANCES ...................................................................................................................................... 12 1.3. ARTICULACIÓN CON OTROS PLANES .................................................................................................... 12 2. MARCO CONCEPTUAL, REFERENCIA LEGAL Y ORGANIZACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE GESTIÓN DE RIESGOS ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Free Trade Agreement Between the Dominican Republic, Central America and the United States
    FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE UNITED STATES _______________ TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER ONE: INITIAL PROVISIONS ....................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER TWO: GENERAL DEFINITIONS................................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER THREE: NATIONAL TREATMENT AND MARKET ACCESS FOR GOODS...................... 9 CHAPTER FOUR: RULES OF ORIGIN AND ORIGIN PROCEDURES .................................................. 62 CHAPTER FIVE : CUSTOMS ADMINISTRATION AND TRADE FACILITATION............................. 78 CHAPTER SIX: SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES ....................................................... 83 CHAPTER SEVEN: TECHNICAL BARRIERS TO TRADE....................................................................... 86 CHAPTER EIGHT: TRADE REMEDIES ...................................................................................................... 91 CHAPTER NINE: GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT ............................................................................... 98 CHAPTER TEN: INVESTMENT .................................................................................................................. 156 CHAPTER ELEVEN: CROSS-BORDER TRADE IN SERVICES ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Xvii Censo De Población Y Vi De Vivienda 2013
    REPÚBLICA DE HONDURAS SECRETARÍA DE ESTADO EN EL DESPACHO PRESIDENCIAL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA XVII CENSO DE POBLACIÓN Y VI DE VIVIENDA 2013 TOMO 73 Municipio de Villanueva 05-11 Departamento de Cortés Características Generales de la Población y las Viviendas. D.R. © Instituto Nacional de Estadística Lomas de Guijarro, Edificio Plaza Guijarros, Contiguo al Ministerio Público Tegucigalpa M.D.C. Apdo. Postal: 15031 Sitio Web: www.ine-hn.org Correo electrónico: [email protected] República de Honduras XVII Censo de Población y VI de Vivienda 2013 Tomo 73 Municipio de Villanueva 05-11, Departamento de Cortés. Características Generales de la Población y las Viviendas. Impreso en Honduras, C.A. REPÚBLICA DE HONDURAS Juan Orlando Hernández Alvarado Presidente de la República CONSEJO DIRECTIVO DEL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA Reinaldo Sánchez Rivera Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de la Presidencia Alden Rivera Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de Desarrollo Económico Edna Yolani Batres Secretaria de Estado en el Despacho de Salud Marlon Escoto Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de Educación Jacobo Paz Bodden Secretario de Estado en el Despacho de Agricultura y Ganadería Carlos Alberto Madero Erazo Secretario de Estado en los Despachos de Trabajo y Seguridad Social Julieta Castellanos Rectora de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras Ramón Espinoza Secretario Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología y Director Ejecutivo Instituto Nacional de Estadística. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA DIRECCIÓN EJECUTIVA Ramón Espinoza Secretario
    [Show full text]