DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture 4: Words Words Words

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture 4: Words Words Words Lecture 4: Words Words Words August 15, 2012 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Last Time Review Questions ‚ What are some of the types of phonological rules that we find in natural language? ‚ What does this phonological rule say? [+consonantal] Ñ [+voice] / [+voice] ‚ Would you expect to find a rule in natural language that affected [n] and [e] only? ‚ How is it that, in English [zb], is OK in [frIzbi] but is bad in [zbir]? § Why is [zb] OK in Italian like [zbalzare]? ‚ Why is it that the /n/ in ‘un’ will sometimes change the way it’s pronounced, as in [2mb@liv@b@l]? § What kind of rule is that? 2 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Last Time Phonology Homework Practice ‚ P.311 #5: Consider some German data § [x] is a velar fricative, [ç] is a palatal fricative [nIçt] “not” [ba:x] “Bach” [re:ç˜@n] “rake” [la:x˜@n] “to laugh” [Slçt] “bad” [kOxt] “cooks” [ri:ç˜@n] “to smell” [fErsu:x˜@n] “to try” [h˜aImlIç] “sly” [ho:x] “high” [rEçts] “rightward” [SlUxt] “canyon” [kri:ç˜@n] “to crawl” [fErflUxt] “accursed” a. Are [x] and [ç] allophones of the same phoneme, or is each an allophone of a separate phoneme? Give your reasons. b. If you conclude that they are allophones of one phoneme, state the rule that can derive the phonetic allophones. 3 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Today Questions for Today ‚ What are morphemes? § Pairings of sound and meaning that are indivisible ‚ What kinds of morphological units do we find? § Roots/stems, affixes § bound and free morphemes § inflectional and derivational morphemes ‚ What do we do with our morphological knowledge? § segment and categorize § build words out of pieces of words, using rules 5 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Today Questions for Today ‚ What determines the way we pronounce a morpheme? § free variation, nearby morphemes, phonology ‚ What underlies the system of building words? § recursive rules and binary, hierarchical, endocentric structure ‚ How do we account for ambuiguity in words? § binary structure! 6 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Wrapping Up Phonology Multiple Rules ‚ Sometimes a single word can be subjected to multiple rules § Consider the /aI/Ñ[2I] rule (Canadian Raising) and the Flapping Rule ‚ /aI/ Ñ [2I] / -voiced “ ‰ +alveo. -cons. ‚ »-cont. fiÑ R / V »+syllabicfi –-nasal fl –-stress fl § Now consider the following data: ‘ride-able’ [raIR2b@l] ‘write-able’ [r2IR2b@l] ‘biding’ [baIRIN] ‘biting’ [b2IRIN] ‘insider’ [InsaIR@r] ‘inciter’ [Ins2IR@r] § Does it matter which rule is applied first? ‚ Let’s write out the derivations with both orders for ‘ride-able’ and ‘write-able’ 8 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Wrapping Up Phonology Multiple Rules ‚ Which derivation produces the appropriate results of ‘ride-able’ as [raIR2b@l] & ‘write-able’ as [r2IR2b@l]? UR /raId2b@l/ /raIt2b@l/ Flapping: raIR2b@l raIR2b@l Canadian Raising: — — SR [raIR2b@l] [raIR2b@l] UR /raId2b@l/ /raIt2b@l/ Canadian Raising: — r2It2b@l Flapping: raIR2b@l r2IR2b@l SR [raIR2b@l] [r2IR2b@l] ‚ Rule-ordering matters! 9 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology What is Morphology? ‚ Words are formed from smaller meaningful units called morphemes § Examples of Morphemes: love, -able, un-, super- § Words: love, lovable, unlovable, superlovable ‚ Morphology is... § (as a component of grammar) ...the system of word formation ‚ In other words: How to make words § (as a field of study) ...the study of word formation in language 11 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology What are Morphemes? ‚ Let’s define morphemes more clearly § Morpheme: A pairing of sound/form and meaning, which doesn’t have meaningful subparts § Another way: A linguistic sign, which doesn’t have meaningful subparts ‚ Let’s look at some words: § retry; relearn; redo; replay; revive; reset; relive ‚ All of these words share a chunk of sounds ([ri]) and a chunk of meaning (something like ‘again’) § How do we explain this? Is it just an accident? ‚ No! [/ri/] is a sound sequence paired with a meaning ‚ This is just like a word – but it is not a word ‚ It attaches to something, adds some sounds and meaning, and makes a word 12 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology What are Morphemes? ‚ Some other examples § [kanst@ntin]: a sequences sound that means something ‚ This is a single morpheme – a pretty big one! § [siIN]: a sequence of sound that means something ‚ This is not a morpheme – it is a sequence of two morphemes! ‚ Practice: What are the syllables in the word [kanst@ntin]? § What relationship is there between syllable structure and morphological structure? § None: some morphemes are syllables, some are smaller, some are bigger 13 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Kinds of Morphemes ‚ Notice that “re-”, unlike most of the verbs it combines with, cannot be used on its own: § ˚ I did it re. § I did it again. ‚ This is because “re-” is a bound morpheme § Bound morphemes are never words by themselves § Instead, they need to form words by combining with other morphemes ‚ On the other hand, ‘again’ can be used on its own, because it is a free morpheme § Free morphemes can be entire words by themselves § Sometimes they combine with other morphemes, but they need not 14 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Kinds of Morphemes ‚ Notice that, in the case of a word like “revive”, “vive” is a verb that cannot be used on its own § We see it in several words: e.g., “survive”, “vivacious”, “convivial”, etc. ‚ In these examples, “vive” shows up as the same basic sound sequence and basic shared meaning in all environments (something about living), and therefore it must be a morpheme § Notice! A words like “revive” is formed by two bound morphemes ‚ Not all words have a free-morpheme component 15 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Kinds of Morphemes ‚ Morphemes can also be divided up into two other groups: affixes and roots § Affixes are bound morphemes that can attach onto a morpheme/word ‚ Affixes have different names depending on where they attach when combinding with the morpheme/word § Roots are the indivisible core of a word to which affixes attach ‚ Roots are usually free morphemes (though not always) 16 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Roots, Stems, Bases and Words ‚ A base is the term for either a root or a stem § A root is the core of any word ‚ They generally carry the most meaning ‚ What do you think the root is in ‘unstylistically’? ‚ Any language has far more roots than affixes § A stem is a derived form that hosts the root and at least one other morpheme ‚ Morphologically speaking, a word word can be a root or a combination of morphemes (stem) (stem) (affix) root (affix) 17 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Roots, Stems, Bases and Words ‚ Remember: just because it’s a root doesn’t mean it can function as a word by itself ‚ Bound Roots: Morphological roots that can’t stand as words by themselves § Frequently, bound roots in English come from Latin ‚ -mit: transmit, commit, submit ‚ -ceive: receive, perceive, deceive § But not always: ‚ overwhelm, *whelm ‚ nonchalant, *chalant ‚ cranberry, *cran 18 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Kinds of Affixes ‚ Prefixes precede the base to which they attach; these are very common § un+lock, pre+paid, post+date, co+sign, non+empty ‚ Suffixes follow the base to which they attach; these are very common § lock+ed, pay+ment, dat+ing, sign+ee, empty+ish 19 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Kinds of Affixes ‚ Infixes are inserted in the middle of a single morpheme, unlike other affixes § Khmer: /l + b + 1@n/ ‚ /l1@n/ means ‘fast’, adding the /b/ infix makes it a noun (‘speed’) § English: ‚ str + itheg +ong (“gibberish”languagegame) ‚ abso + friggin’ + lutely (expletive infixation) ‚ saxo + ma +phone (HomericInfixation,Yu2004) § Typically, infixes are sensitive to phonological structure ‚ Khmer’s /b/ and English’s gibberish infix are inserted after the onset of the first syllable ‚ The expletive infixes come before the stressed syllable ‚ Homeric -ma- comes after the first foot (group of two syllables) 20 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Kinds of Affixes ‚ Circumfixes surround the base to which they attach § English: em + bold + en ‚ *bold + en, *em + bold § Hungarian: legnagyobb /lEg + naéo + b/ ‚ ‘nagy’ means ‘big’, adding ‘leg-...-bb’ changes it to mean ‘biggest’ § Kabyle: /T + isli + T/ ‚ /isli/ means ‘groom’, adding /T+...+T/ changes it to mean ‘bride’ 21 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Derivational and Inflectional Affixes Derivational Inflectional ‚ Plays a lexical ‚ Plays only a (meaningful) role grammatical role § re-run vs. run § runn-ing vs. run ‚ Might change base’s ‚ Does not change base’s category category § runn-er vs. run § run-s vs. run ‚ Tends to not be required ‚ Is usually required by by grammatical rules grammatical rules § They’re (re-)running it. § He runs it. § ˚ He run it. 22 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Derivational and Inflectional Affixes Derivational Inflectional ‚ Derivational suffixes ‚ Inflectional suffixes precede inflectional follow derivational suffixes suffixes § coloni-al-iz-ation-ist-s § re-volu-tion-iz-er-s ‚ Don’t have to be ‚ The most productive productive affixes § unhappy vs. *unsad § running, jumping, friending, texting, etc. 23 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Inflectional Affixes ‚ English only has a 8... and they’re all suffixes! ‚ Verbal Inflectional Morphemes: § –s 3SG Present Tense ‚ I dance. He dances. § –ed Past Tense ‚ I dance. I danced. § –ing Progressive Participle ‚ I dance. I am dancing. § –en Past/Passive Participle ‚ I eat. I have eaten. 24 Lecture 4: Words Words Words Morphology Inflectional Affixes ‚ Nominal Inflectional Morphemes: § –s Plural ‚ My cat. My cats. § ’s Possesssive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Are the Limits of Polysynthesis?
    International Symposium on Polysynthesis in the World's Languages February 20-21, 2014 NINJAL, Tokyo What are the limits of Polysynthesis? Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun, and Nicholas Evans Of the various labels for morphological types currently in use by typologists ‘polysynthesis’ has proved to be the most difficult to pin down. For some it just represents an extreme on the dimension of synthesis (one of Sapir’s two major typological axes) while for others it is an independent category or parameter with far- reaching morphosyntactic ramifications. A recent characterization (Evans & Sasse 2002: 3f.) is the following: ‘Essentially, then, a prototypical polysynthetic language is one in which it is possible, in a single word, to use processes of morphological composition to encode information about both the predicate and all its arguments, for all major clause types [....] to a level of specificity, allowing this word to serve alone as a free-standing utterance without reliance on context.’ If the nub of polysynthesis is the packing of a lot of material into single verb forms that would be expressed as independent words in less synthetic languages, what exactly is the nature of and limitations on this ‘material’? The present paper investigates the limits – both upwards and downwards – of what the term is generally understood to cover. Reference Evans, N. & H.-J. Sasse (eds.). (2002). Problems of Polysynthesis. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 1 2014-01-08 International Symposium on Polysynthesis in the World's Languages February 20-21, 2014 NINJAL, Tokyo Polysynthesis in Ainu Anna Bugaeva (National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics) Ainu is a typical polysynthetic language in the sense that a single complex verb can express what takes a whole sentence in most other languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Periphrasis in Ontogeny and Phylogeny
    Periphrasis in Ontogeny and Phylogeny Michael Tsai May 17, 2001 1 Introduction Periphrasis may be defined as “the use of longer, multi-word expressions in place of single words”1 [Haspelmath 2000, p. 654]. The term applies in many linguistic domains, from verb conjugation (with temporal auxiliaries) to comparative forms (with more) to interrogatives (with do). A periphrastic expression is composed of free morphemes, while a monolectic expression consists of a single word that may be composed of several morphemes bound together, e.g. through inflection. This distinction applies not just to expressions, but also to whole languages: so-called analytic (isolating) languages contain mostly monomorphemic words and rely heavily on syntax to express meaning, synthetic (inflectional) languages rely more on morphology, and polysynthetic languages can express whole sentences as a single string of bound morphemes [O’Grady 1997]. However, these terms are rough classifications, and many languages contain both analytic and synthetic elements, sometimes even in the same paradigm. The balance between the two differs with the area of grammar under consideration, but it may also differ within the same area of grammar over time. In this paper we will examine the tension between periphrastic and bound forms with respect to two aspects of grammar: tenses and interrogatives. We will examine these from the perspectives of language creation and language change, drawing on evidence from creoles2 and historical linguistics. Results from language acquisition will link these two disciplines and suggest motivations for the diachronic changes and the patterns that emerge. 1Strictly speaking, the boundary between periphrasis and discourse is ill-defined, for it depends upon what languages exist and what linguists know about them.
    [Show full text]
  • Livret Des Résumés Booklet of Abstracts
    34èmes Journées de Linguistique d’Asie Orientale JLAO34 34th Paris Meeting on East Asian Linguistics 7–9 juillet 2021 / July, 7th–9th 2021 Colloque en ligne / Online Conference LIVRET DES RÉSUMÉS BOOKLET OF ABSTRACTS Comité d’organisation/Organizing committee Raoul BLIN, Ludovica LENA, Xin LI, Lin XIAO [email protected] *** Table des matières / Table of contents *** Van Hiep NGUYEN (Keynote speaker): On the study of grammar in Vietnam Julien ANTUNES: Description et analyse de l’accent des composés de type NOM-GENITIF-NOM en japonais moderne Giorgio Francesco ARCODIA: On ‘structural particles’ in Sinitic languages: typology and diachrony Huba BARTOS: Mandarin Chinese post-nuclear glides under -er suffixation Bianca BASCIANO: Degree achievements in Mandarin Chinese: A comparison between 加 jiā+ADJ and 弄 nòng+ADJ verbs Etienne BAUDEL: Chinese and Sino-Japanese lexical items in the Hachijō language of Japan Françoise BOTTERO: Xu Shen’s graphic analysis revisited Tsan Tsai CHAN: Cartographic fieldwork on sentence-final particles – Three challenges and some ways around them Hanzhu CHEN & Meng CHENG: Corrélation entre l’absence d’article et la divergence lexicale Shunting CHEN, Yiming LIANG & Pascal AMSILI: Chinese Inter-clausal Anaphora in Conditionals: A Linear Regression Study Zhuo CHEN: Differentiating two types of Mandarin unconditionals: Their internal and external syntax Katia CHIRKOVA: Aspect, Evidentiality, and Modality in Shuhi Anastasia DURYMANOVA: Nouns and verbs’ syntactic shift: some evidences against Old Chinese parts-of- speech
    [Show full text]
  • Bound Free Morphemes Examples
    Bound free morphemes examples They comprise simple words (i.e. words made up of one free morpheme) and compound words (i.e. words made up of two free morphemes). Examples. Contrast with bound morpheme. Many words in English consist of a single free morpheme. For example, each word in the following sentence is. Examples of derivational morphemes are un- and -ly in the word unfriendly" (Denise E. Murray and MaryAnn Christison, What English. Bound and free morphemes. Free morphemes: constitute words by themselves – boy, car, desire, gentle, man; can stand alone. Bound morphemes: can't stand. Bound and free morphemes. Free morphemes: o constitute words by themselves – boy, car, desire, gentle, man. o can stand alone. Definition. Every morpheme can be classified as either free or For example, un- appears only accompanied by. In morphology, a bound morpheme is a morpheme that appears only as part of a larger word; a free morpheme or unbound morpheme is one that can stand alone or can appear with other lexemes. A bound morpheme is also known as a bound form, and similarly a free A similar example is given in Chinese; most of its morphemes are. There are two types of morphemes-free morphemes and bound morphemes. "Free morphemes" can stand alone with a specific meaning, for example, eat, date. An affix is a bound morpheme, which means that it is exclusively attached to a free morpheme for meaning. Prefixes and suffixes are the most common examples. Those morphemes that can stand alone as words are called free morphemes. (e.g., boy Bound grammatical morphemes can be further divided into two types: inflectional For example, the –er in buyer means something like 'the one who,'.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Notion of Metaphor in Sign Languages Some Observations Based on Russian Sign Language
    John Benjamins Publishing Company This is a contribution from Sign Language & Linguistics 20:2 © 2017. John Benjamins Publishing Company This electronic file may not be altered in any way. The author(s) of this article is/are permitted to use this PDF file to generate printed copies to be used by way of offprints, for their personal use only. Permission is granted by the publishers to post this file on a closed server which is accessible only to members (students and faculty) of the author's/s' institute. It is not permitted to post this PDF on the internet, or to share it on sites such as Mendeley, ResearchGate, Academia.edu. Please see our rights policy on https://benjamins.com/content/customers/rights For any other use of this material prior written permission should be obtained from the publishers or through the Copyright Clearance Center (for USA: www.copyright.com). Please contact [email protected] or consult our website: www.benjamins.com On the notion of metaphor in sign languages Some observations based on Russian Sign Language Vadim Kimmelmana, Maria Kyusevab, Yana Lomakinac, and Daria Perovad aUniversity of Amsterdam / bThe University of Melbourne / cUnaffiliated researcher / dHigher School of Economics, Moscow Metaphors in sign languages have been an important research topic in recent years, and Taub’s (2001) model of metaphor formation in signs has been influ- ential in the field. In this paper, we analyze metaphors in signs of cognition and emotions in Russian Sign Language (RSL) and argue for a modification of Taub’s (2001) theory of metaphor. We demonstrate that metaphor formation in RSL uses a number of mechanisms: a concrete sign can acquire metaphorical mean- ing without change, a part of a sequential compound can acquire a metaphorical meaning, and a morpheme within a productive sign or a simultaneous com- pound can acquire a metaphorical meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Syntactic Analysis and Theory
    An Introduction to Syntactic Analysis and Theory Hilda Koopman Dominique Sportiche Edward Stabler 1 Morphology: Starting with words 1 2 Syntactic analysis introduced 37 3 Clauses 87 4 Many other phrases: first glance 101 5 X-bar theory and a first glimpse of discontinuities 121 6 The model of syntax 141 7 Binding and the hierarchical nature of phrase structure 163 8 Apparent violations of Locality of Selection 187 9 Raising and Control 203 10 Summary and review 223 iii 1 Morphology: Starting with words Our informal characterization defined syntax as the set of rules or princi- ples that govern how words are put together to form phrases, well formed sequences of words. Almost all of the words in it have some common sense meaning independent of the study of language. We more or less understand what a rule or principle is. A rule or principle describes a regularity in what happens. (For example: “if the temperature drops suddenly, water vapor will condense”). This notion of rule that we will be interested in should be distinguished from the notion of a rule that is an instruction or a statement about what should happen, such as “If the light is green, do not cross the street.” As linguists, our primary interest is not in how anyone says you should talk. Rather, we are interested in how people really talk. In common usage, “word” refers to some kind of linguistic unit. We have a rough, common sense idea of what a word is, but it is surprisingly difficult to characterize this precisely.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Morphology: the Words of Language
    Ch. 3 Morphology: The Words of Language The Words of Language • In spoken language we don’t pause between most words • So when you hear a sentence in a language you don’t know, you won’t be able to tell where one word ends and the next begins • Most English speakers can pick out all of the words in Thecatsatonthemat because they can identify all those words The Words of Language • These boundaries between words can be played with for humor, as in the credits for NPR’s Car Talk: • Copyeditor: Adeline Moore • Pollution Control: Maury Missions • Legal Firm: Dewey Cheetham The Words of Language • Lexicon: Our mental dictionary of all the words we know • Lexicographers aim to create written records of our lexicons (dictionaries) • Dictionaries describe the spelling, standard pronunciation, definitions of meaning, and parts of speech of each word • They may also prescribe language use Content and Function Words • Content words: the words that convey conceptual meaning (nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc.) • Open class: new types of content words can be added all the time • E.g. a new noun called a flurg would be fine • Function words: the words that convey grammatical meaning (articles, prepositions, conjunctions, etc.) • Closed class: new function words are very rarely added to a language • English does not have a gender-neutral third person singular pronoun, and rather than adopt a new pronoun, many people use they instead of choosing between he and she. Content and Function Words • The brain treats content and function words differently • Some aphasics are unable to read the function words in and which but can read the content words inn and witch.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purposes of This 11Th-Grade Unit on Language Are to Survey the Most Important Grammatical Elements of the English Sentence A
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 028 181 24 TE 001 334 Unit 1104: An Outline of Grammatical Elements. Minnesota Univ., Mtnnezipolis. Center lor Curriculum Develci:Inentin English. Spons Agency-Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D.C. Bureau of Research. Bureau No- BR -5-0658 Pub Date 68 Contract OEC -SAE -31 0-010 Note- 35p. EDRS Price MF-$0.25 HC-$1.85 Descriptors-Adjectives, Adverbs, *Curriculum Guides, *English Instruction, *Grade11, *Grammar, *Language, Linguistics, Morpheme% Nominals, Secondary Education, Sentence Structure, StructuralAnalysis, Syntax, Verbs Identifiers-Minnesota Center Curriculum Developmcnt in English, *ProjectEnglish The purposes of this 11th-gradeunit on language are to survey the most importantgrammaticalelementsoftheEnglishsentence andtosynthesize grammatical principles previously learned in grades 7-10 ofthe curriculum. The unit moves from discussions of the simplest grammatical elements to themore complex: Bound and free morphemesare defined, and ways in which they are combined in word formation are determined. The roles ofnouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs in phrases and sentencesare inductively presented. Basic sentence patterns are then expanded by transformations into othertypes of sentences--questions, negations. complex sentences, sentences with indirect objects,sentences with predicate objects. and sentences in the passive voice. Finally, themore complex basic syntactic patterns of predication, complementation, modification,and coordination are analyzed. The materials include procedural notes, sample lecture-discussions,and worksheets. (See TE 001 265, TE 001 268. and TE 001 272 forprevious grammar units.) (JB) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE Of EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIPIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of English and Igala Morphological Processes by Andrew-Ogidi, Rakiya Christiana December, 2006
    A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH AND IGALA MORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSES BY ANDREW-OGIDI, RAKIYA CHRISTIANA DECEMBER, 2006 A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH AND IGALA MORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSES BY ANDREW-OGIDICHRISTIANA RAKIYA MA/ARTS/38422/02-04 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL, AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA, IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER DEGREE. (ENGLISH LANGUAGE) DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH FACULTY OF ARTS AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA NIGERIA DECEMBER, 2006 ii DECLARATION I Andrew-Ogidi, Rakiya Christiana do solemnly declare that, this Thesis has been written by me and that it is a record of my own research work. It has not been presented in any previous application for higher degree. All sources of information are duly acknowledged by means of references. ………………………………..…………. …………….……… Andrew-Ogidi, Christiana Rakiya Date iii CERTIFICATION This is to certify that, this thesis, entitled ‘A comparative analysis of English and Igala Morphological processes’ submitted by Andrew-Ogidi, Rakiya Christiana meets the regulations governing the award of the Degree of Master of Arts of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria and is approved for its contribution to knowledge and literary presentation. ……………………………………….. ………………… Dr. Joshua A. Adebayo Date Chairman, Supervisory Committee ……………………………………….. ………………… Dr. Gbenga Ibileye Date Member Supervisory Committee ……………………………………….. ………………… Dr. Joshua A. Adebayo Date ……………………………………….. ………………… Dean Post-graduate School Date iv DEDICATION To Faith Eneole Ogidi – my beautiful daughter v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Glory belongs to God who sees the intents of a mans heart, life up the humble, and debases the proud. In Him is the fullness of all knowledge. Without Him, this research would have been a mirage. Once again, by Him, I have lept over a well.
    [Show full text]
  • DIKTAT Into2ling
    DIKTAT INTRODUCTION TO LINGUISTICS OLEH: SUSANA WIDYASTUTI NIP. 132 316 016 JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS FAKULTAS BAHASA DAN SENI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOVEMBER, 2008 Kegiatan ini Dilaksanakan Berdasarkan Surat Perjanjian Pelaksanaan Penulisan Diktat Antara Pembantu Dekan I dengan Dosen Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Nomor: 07/Kontrak-Diktat/H.34.12/PP/VI/2008 1 Preface This module is aimed at introducing the basic concepts and essential terminology of linguistics. Linguistics is a highly technical field and technical vocabulary cannot be avoided. Therefore, a clear and brief explanation on each term is extremely needed to see the correlation between those terms. This module is to be used by the third semester- students of English Department, as it gives fundamental concepts of linguistics before they take other courses of linguistics branches. This module is designed to assist the students to learn the nature of language and its function in daily life and linguistics as the study of language. Students are expected to read the resources and websites which are listed on the references page. Doing the exercises at the end of every chapter is highly recommended for students’ comprehension. 2 Contents page 1. Language 3 2. Linguistics 10 3. Theories of Linguistics 15 4. The languages of the world 23 5. Phonetics: Description of Sounds 30 6. Phonology: Sound Arrangement 38 7. Morphology: Words and Pieces of Words 46 8. Syntax: Sentence Patterns and Analysis 56 9. Semantics: Meanings of words and sentences 64 10. Pragmatics : Language in Use 72 11. Sociolinguistics: language and society 81 12. Psycholinguistics: Language and Mind 88 3 010101 Language This chapter outlines some important ‘design features’ of human language, and explores the extent to which they are found in animal communication.
    [Show full text]
  • 01:615:201 Introduction to Linguistic Theory Morphology: the Words of Language
    01:615:201 Introduction to Linguistic Theory Adam Szczegielniak Morphology: The Words of Language Copyright in part : Cengage learning The Words of Language • In spoken language we don’t pause between most words • So when you hear a sentence in a language you don’t know, you won’t be able to tell where one word ends and the next begins • Most English speakers can pick out all of the words in Thecatsatonthemat because they can identify all those words The Words of Language • These boundaries between words can be played with for humor, as in the credits for NPR’s Car Talk: – Copyeditor: Adeline Moore – Pollution Control: Maury Missions – Legal Firm: Dewey, Cheetham, and Howe The Words of Language • We all have a mental dictionary of all the words we know, which includes the following information: – Pronunciation – Meaning – Orthography (spelling) – Grammatical category Content Words and Function Words • Content words: the words that convey conceptual meaning (nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc.) – Open class: new types of content words can be added all the time • E.g. a new noun called a flurg would be fine • Function words: the words that convey grammatical meaning (articles, prepositions, conjunctions, etc.) – Closed class: new function words are very rarely added to a language • English does not have a gender-neutral third person singular pronoun, and rather than adopt a new pronoun, many people use they instead of choosing between he and she. Content Words and Function Words • The brain treats content and function words differently – Some aphasics are unable to read the function words in and which but can read the content words inn and witch.
    [Show full text]
  • Free and Bound Morphemes
    Read the introductory comments below, and write out answers to the questions that follow: There are two common ways to categorize the way that derivational morphemes combine to form new words. Bound vs. Free Morphemes A bound morpheme cannot stand alone as an English word. It includes many prefixes and suffixes like -ity in cordiality. A free morpheme can stand alone, as illustrated in cordial and both halves of over-take and cook-book. When two free morphemes combine, like cookbook, it gives a compound word. Base and Affix This distinction is similar to the one above except that a base does not need to have independent status as a word. An affix is either a prefix or a suffix. Examples from class included the consistent element in a sequence like refer, defer, infer, prefer. Question 1: Would you add "offer" to that list? Why or why not? Does etymology decide? Question 2: Consider the following list: inflect, deflect, reflect, genuflect How would you divide them into bound and free morphemes? Into base and affix? Question 3: Break down each of the following words into as many of the four categories as apply (bound, free, base, affix) and write them in the appropriate cell in the table below. Refer to this table for questions 4-7 below. bound free base affix jumped insight intuits discrete cineplex Question 4: Can a bound morpheme be a base? Question 5: Can a bound morpheme be an affix? Must it be? Question 6: Can a free morpheme be a base? Must it be? Question 7: Can a free morpheme be an affix? To test your conclusions, try to think of counterexamples.
    [Show full text]