DOCSLIB.ORG

Injection Drug Use and Crack Cocaine Smoking: Independent and Dual Risk Behaviors for HIV Infection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Injection Drug Use and Crack Cocaine Smoking: Independent and Dual Risk Behaviors for HIV Infection Injection Drug Use and Crack Cocaine Smoking: Independent and Dual Risk Behaviors for HIV Infection CLYDE B. MCCOY, PHD, SHENGHAN LAI, MD, PHD, LISA R. METSCH, PHD, SARAH E. MESSIAH, MPH, AND WEI ZHAO, MD, MS PURPOSE: Previous studies have examined the practices of injecting drugs or smoking crack cocaine as high-risk, but independent, factors for HIV transmission. To explore the independent and dual risks of injection practices and crack smoking, this study examined HIV seroprevalence rates among distinct drug user groups, based on patterns of daily administration. METHODS: A sample of 3555 drug users and neighborhood controls in urban Miami, FL and rural Belle Glade and Immokalee, FL were partitioned into four mutually-exclusive groups: 1) injection drug users (IDUs); 2) crack-cocaine smokers; 3) dual users who both smoked crack and injected drugs; and 4) non–drug-user controls. RESULTS: HIV seroprevalence rates were 45.1% for IDUs, 30.5% for dual users, 20.1% for crack smokers and 7.3% for controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that when compared with controls odds ratios for HIV seropositivity were 9.81 for IDUs, 5.27 for dual users, and 2.24 for crack smokers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence of: 1) behavioral and structural co-factors that influence HIV exposure patterns among drug users; and 2) the substantially higher risk of HIV infection among IDUs compared with other drug users. Intervention strategies must be tailored for the specific drug use subpopulations to optimize efficacy. Ann Epidemiol 2004;14:535–542. ą 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. KEY WORDS: Injection Drug Users, HIV Infection, Crack Cocaine. as clear in terms of how or why certain subpopulations INTRODUCTION within the IDU group such as multi-drug users may contrib- As the HIV/AIDS epidemic enters its third decade in the ute to the epidemic. Despite findings reporting that IDUs United States, research has shown that illicit drug users and crack cocaine smokers share social networks, norms, continue to fuel the epidemic due to high risk drug use and and risk behaviors (38, 39), few studies have considered the sexual practices, accounting for over one quarter of the interplay of drug injection and crack smoking for those who nation’s total AIDS cases (1). In the year 2000, 42,156 engage in both forms of drug use and their subsequent rela- new cases of AIDS were reported (1), 28% of which were tionship to HIV transmission and seroprevalence (7, 32, injection drug user (IDU)-related, due to both high-risk 40, 41). In one of the only recent studies that has considered injection and sex practices (2–28). Non-injection drug use this interaction, a lower rate of HIV infection was found in (such as crack-cocaine and heroin sniffing) also contributes dual users of crack and injection drugs compared with IDUs to the spread of the epidemic through risky sexual behav- who did not smoke crack, despite a higher prevalence of iors such as trading sex for drugs and/or money or having self-reported sexual risk behaviors (32). However, this study sex with an HIV-infected drug user (1, 7, 29–37). did not include a non-drug using control group. The authors, Although injection drug use is clearly a high-risk behav- as well as others (41), have suggested that crack-smoking ior for HIV infection, the epidemiological literature is not injectors may comprise a subgroup with distinctive drug use patterns and unique social network characteristics. Further investigation is needed to clarify the intersection of drug injection and crack smoking in relation to HIV From the Comprehensive Drug Research Center, Department of Epide- seropositivity to address the gaps in basic behavioral and miology and Public Health, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida (C.B.M., L.R.M., S.E.M., W.Z.); and Johns Hopkins Uni- social processes that contribute to HIV risk (42). Therefore, versity, Baltimore, Maryland (S.L.). the present study compares HIV seroprevalence among Address correspondence to: Clyde B. McCoy, Ph.D., Department of four mutually-exclusive drug-user groups: 1) current injec- Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1801 NW 9th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33136. Tel.: (305) 243-6005; Fax: tors who did not smoke crack, 2) current crack cocaine (305) 243-3353. E-mail: [email protected] smokers who did not inject, 3) dual users who both currently This research was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, smoked crack and injected drugs, and 4) a baseline compari- grants DARO107694, DARO109953, and the University of Miami Drug Abuse and AIDS Research Center (DA P3013870). son group of neighborhood controls who neither smoked Received July 11, 2003; accepted October 8, 2003. crack nor injected drugs. ą 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1047-2797/04/$–see front matter 360 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10010 doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.10.001 536 McCoy et al. AEP Vol. 14, No. 8 DRUG USE AND HIV RISK BEHAVIORS September 2004: 535–542 were used to recruit their drug user counterparts, and shared METHODS similar demographic and social characteristics as a result. Data for this analysis were obtained from the University of To determine whether drug type was independently re- Miami Community AIDS Research and Evaluation Studies lated to HIV seropositivity, additional demographic and (Miami CARES) conducted between 1988 and 1994 in risk behavior variables traditionally associated with HIV urban Miami, Florida and two rural communities, Belle seropositivity (7, 29, 32) were analyzed. Univariate logistic Glade and Immokalee, also located in South Florida (43– regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship 46). More specifically, Belle Glade is a small, rural, agricul- between each independent variable and HIV seropositivity. tural community located at the southern tip of Lake Okee- Cross-tabulations of risk behaviors by drug use group and chobee in Palm Beach County, approximately 50 miles stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis were per- north of Miami. Immokalee is a rural, migrant agricultural formed to quantify the association between drug use and community located in Collier County, approximately 150 HIV seropositivity. Finally, a stepwise comparison of each drug type group vs. the control group was performed to miles Northwest of Miami. Both Belle Glade and Immokalee determine what, and how much, risk behaviors were being have a permanent population of approximately 18,000, and conducted by each group. are supplemented by migrant workers who winter in the area, picking vegetables and fruits. Outreach workers recruited participants from street venues, housing projects, public RESULTS transport, and other public areas not associated with medical care, drug treatment, or the criminal justice system. Eligible Outreach workers recruited 3555 participants: 2465 from participants were at least 18 years of age, had not been in Miami, 254 from Belle Glade, and 836 from Immokalee. Demographic characteristics and respective HIV status drug treatment for 30 days prior to assessment, and reported are presented in Table 1. Overall, 62.9% of the sample current drug use (defined as drug use in the last 30 days). Interviews were conducted by trained interviewers at a TABLE 1. Demographic characteristics and HIV seropositivity free-standing community assessment center in the respective of study participants (N ϭ 3555) areas. Respondents were encouraged to participate through N%HIVϩ (%) the use of small monetary incentives and by written assur- ance of anonymity and confidentiality. Study site Miami 2465 69.4 26.6 After agreeing to participate and signing a consent state- Belle Glade 254 7.1 23.6 ment, study participants were administered a standardized Immokalee 836 23.5 8.4 HIV risk assessment instrument and provided with pre-test Gender counseling. Certified phlebotomists collected blood samples Male 2235 62.9 19.5 Female 1320 37.1 26.5 for HIV serotesting. HIV seropositivity was defined as a Ethnicity* repeatedly reactive ELISA with Protein gel blot confir- African American 2558 72.0 26.5 mation and was performed by local licensed laboratories. Hispanic 613 17.3 9.1 Verification of self-reported drug use among both the IDU Non-Hispanic White 343 9.7 12.5 Age* and non-IDU drug user groups was confirmed by urinalysis 18–24 393 11.1 16.0 with the ONTRAK toxicological screen kits from Roche 25–44 2721 77.0 24.0 Diagnostic Laboratories for opiates, cocaine, and marijuana 45ϩ 422 11.9 16.1 and direct examination for physical track marks. Non-IDUs Education* Ͻ were also examined for tracks marks to contend with any High school 2017 56.8 22.4 Ͼ High school 1534 43.2 21.7 possible detection bias. Employment* Study participants were members of one of the following Full-time 406 11.4 15.5 mutually-exclusive drug-user groups: 1) current injectors Part-time 1102 31.0 18.0 who did not smoke crack, 2) current crack cocaine smok- Unemployed 2045 57.6 25.0 Lives alone ers who did not inject, 3) dual users who both currently No 2535 71.3 22.2 smoked crack and injected drugs, and 4) a baseline compari- Yes 1020 28.7 21.8 son group of neighborhood controls who neither smoked Children living with you crack nor injected drugs. Although the baseline comparison No 2980 83.8 21.9 Yes 575 16.2 23.0 group included individuals who neither smoked crack nor Street homeless injected drugs, in some cases there was alcohol and/or mari- No 3119 87.7 22.1 juana use reported. The control group was recruited from Yes 436 12.3 21.8 the same geographic locales, by the identical methods that *Does not add up to 3555 due to missing value.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intravenous Therapy Procedure Manual
    INTRAVENOUS THERAPY PROCEDURE MANUAL - 1 - LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE __________________________________________ hereby approves (Facility) the attached Reference Manual as of _____________________. (Date) The Intravenous Therapy Procedure Manual will be reviewed at least annually or more often when deemed appropriate. Revisions will be reviewed as they occur. Current copies of the Intravenous Therapy Procedure Manual shall be maintained at each appropriate nursing station. I have reviewed this manual and agree to its approval. __________________________ (Administrator) __________________________ (Director of Nursing) __________________________ (Medical Director) - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION A. Purpose 1 B. Local Standard of Practice 1 RESPONSIBILITIES A. Responsibilities: M Chest Pharmacy 1 B. Responsibilities: Administrator 1 C. Responsibilities: Director of Nursing Services (DON/DNS) 1 D. Skills Validation 2 AMENDMENTS GUIDELINES A. Resident Candidacy for IV Therapy 1 B. Excluded IV Medications and Therapies 1 C. Processing the IV Order 1 D. IV Solutions/Medications: Storage 2 E. IV Solutions/Medications: Handling 3 F. IV Solutions and Supplies: Destroying and Returning 4 G. IV Tubing 5 H. Peripheral IV Catheters and Needles 6 I. Central Venous Devices 7 J. Documentation and Monitoring 8 K. IV Medication Administration Times 9 L. Emergency IV Supplies 10 I TABLE OF CONTENTS PROTOCOLS A. IV Antibiotic 1 1. Purpose 2. Guidelines 3. Nursing Responsibilities B. IV Push 2 1. Purpose 2. Guidelines C. Anaphylaxis Allergic Reaction 4 1. Purpose 2. Guidelines 3. Nursing Responsibilities and Interventions 4. Signs and Symptoms of Anaphylaxis 5. Drugs Used to Treat Anaphylaxis 6. Physician Protocol PRACTICE GUIDELINES A. Purpose 1 B. Personnel 1 C. Competencies 1 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Injection Technique 1: Administering Drugs Via the Intramuscular Route
    Copyright EMAP Publishing 2018 This article is not for distribution except for journal club use Clinical Practice Keywords Intramuscular injection/ Medicine administration/Absorption Practical procedures This article has been Injection technique double-blind peer reviewed Injection technique 1: administering drugs via the intramuscular route rugs administered by the intra- concerns that nurses are still performing Author Eileen Shepherd is clinical editor muscular (IM) route are depos- outdated and ritualistic practice relating to at Nursing Times. ited into vascular muscle site selection, aspirating back on the syringe Dtissue, which allows for rapid (Greenway, 2014) and skin cleansing. Abstract The intramuscular route allows absorption into the circulation (Dough- for rapid absorption of drugs into the erty and Lister, 2015; Ogston-Tuck, 2014). Site selection circulation. Using the correct injection Complications of poorly performed IM Four muscle sites are recommended for IM technique and selecting the correct site injection include: administration: will minimise the risk of complications. l Pain – strategies to reduce this are l Vastus lateris; outlined in Box 1; l Rectus femoris Citation Shepherd E (2018) Injection l Bleeding; l Deltoid; technique 1: administering drugs via l Abscess formation; l Ventrogluteal (Fig 1, Table 1). the intramuscular route. Nursing Times l Cellulitis; Traditionally the dorsogluteal (DG) [online]; 114: 8, 23-25. l Muscle fibrosis; muscle was used for IM injections but this l Injuries to nerves and blood vessels muscle is in close proximity to a major (Small, 2004); blood vessel and nerves, with sciatic nerve l Inadvertent intravenous (IV) access. injury a recognised complication (Small, These complications can be avoided if 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • 22428 Moxifloxacin Statisical PREA
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office of Translational Science Office of Biostatistics S TATISTICAL R EVIEW AND E VALUATION CLINICAL STUDIES NDA/Serial Number: 22,428 Drug Name: Moxifloxacin AF (moxifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic solution) 0.5% Indication(s): Treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis Applicant: Alcon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. Date(s): Letter date:21 May 2010; Filing date: 18 June, 2010; PDUFA goal date: 19 November 2010 Review Priority: Priority Biometrics Division: Anti-infective and Ophthalmology Products Statistical Reviewer: Mark. A. Gamalo, Ph.D. Concurring Reviewers: Yan Wang, Ph.D. Medical Division: Anti-infective and Ophthalmology Products Clinical Reviewer: Lucious Lim, M.D. Project Manager: Lori Gorski Keywords: superiority, Moxifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, bacterial conjunctivitis, bulbar conjunctival injection, conjunctival discharge/exudate TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 4 1. 1 Conclusions and Recommendations..................................................................................... 4 1. 2 Brief Overview of Clinical Studies .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Informed Consent for Medication, Zyprexa
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES STATE OF WISCONSIN Division of Care and Treatment Services 42 CFR483.420(a)(2) F-24277 (09/2016) DHS 134.31(3)(o) DHS 94.03 & 94.09 §§ 51.61(1)(g) & (h) INFORMED CONSENT FOR MEDICATION Dosage and / or Side Effect information last revised on 04/16/2021 Completion of this form is voluntary. If not completed, the medication cannot be administered without a court order unless in an emergency. This consent is maintained in the client’s record and is accessible to authorized users. Name – Patient / Client (Last, First MI) ID Number Living Unit Date of Birth , Name – Individual Preparing This Form Name – Staff Contact Name / Telephone Number – Institution ANTICIPATED RECOMMENDED MEDICATION CATEGORY MEDICATION DOSAGE DAILY TOTAL DOSAGE RANGE RANGE Antipsychotic / Bipolar Agent Zyprexa oral tablet; Oral: 2.5 mg-50 mg with most doses in Zyprexa Zydis oral the 2.5 mg-20 mg range disintegrating tablet; IM: 5 mg-10 mg per dose, up to 3 doses Zyprexa Intramuscular 24 hours Injection; Long Acting Injectable: 150 mg-300 mg Zyprexa Relprevv IM every 2 weeks, Intramuscluar Injection 300 mg-405 mg IM every 4 weeks (olanzapine) The anticipated dosage range is to be individualized, may be above or below the recommended range but no medication will be administered without your informed and written consent. Recommended daily total dosage range of manufacturer, as stated in Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) or another standard reference. This medication will be administered Orally Injection Other – Specify: 1. Reason for Use of Psychotropic Medication and Benefits Expected (note if this is ‘Off-Label’ Use) Include DSM-5 diagnosis or the diagnostic “working hypothesis.” 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Monograph
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH Pr SANDOZ ONDANSETRON ODT Ondansetron Orally Disintegrating Tablets 4 mg and 8 mg ondansetron Manufacturer Standard Pr SANDOZ ONDANSETRON Ondansetron Tablets 4 mg and 8 mg ondansetron (as ondansetron hydrochloride dihydrate) Manufacturer Standard PrONDANSETRON INJECTION USP (ondansetron hydrochloride dihydrate) 2 mg/mL PrONDANSETRON HYDROCHLORIDE DIHYDRATE INJECTION Ondansetron Injection Manufacturer Standard 2 mg/mL Ondansetron (as ondansetron hydrochloride dihydrate) for injection Antiemetic (5-HT3-receptor antagonist) Sandoz Canada Inc. Date of Preparation: 145 Jules-Léger September 26, 2016 Boucherville, Québec, Canada J4B 7K8 Control No.: 198381 Ondansetron by Sandoz Page 1 of 43 Table of Contents PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .......................................................... 3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION ................................................................................. 3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE ....................................................................................... 4 CONTRAINDICATIONS ............................................................................................................ 4 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS .......................................................................................... 5 ADVERSE REACTIONS ............................................................................................................ 7 DRUG INTERACTIONS ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How to Administer Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Vaccines to Adults
    How to Administer Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Vaccine Injections to Adults Intramuscular (IM) Injections Administer these vaccines via IM route • Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) • Hepatitis A (HepA) • Hepatitis B (HepB) • Human papillomavirus (HPV) acromion process (bony prominence above deltoid) • Influenza vaccine, injectable (IIV) • level of armpit • Influenza vaccine, recombinant (RIV3; RIV4) • Meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) IM injection site • Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) (shaded area = deltoid muscle) • Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13) • Pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPSV23) – elbow may also be given Subcut • Polio (IPV) – may also be given Subcut • Tetanus, diphtheria (Td), or with pertussis (Tdap) • Zoster, recombinant (RZV; Shingrix) 90° angle Injection site skin Give in the central and thickest portion of the deltoid muscle – above the level of the armpit and approximately subcutaneous tissue 2–3 fingerbreadths (~2") below the acromion process. See the diagram. To avoid causing an injury, do not inject muscle too high (near the acromion process) or too low. Needle size Note: A ⅝" needle is sufficient in adults weighing less than 130 lbs (<60 kg) for IM injection in the deltoid muscle only if the subcutane- 22–25 gauge, 1–1½" needle (see note at right) ous tissue is not bunched and the injection is made at a 90° angle; Needle insertion a 1" needle is sufficient in adults weighing 130–152 lbs (60–70 kg); a 1–1½" needle is recommended in women weighing 153–200 lbs • Use a needle long enough to reach deep into the muscle. (70–90 kg) and men weighing 153–260 lbs (70–118 kg); a 1½" needle • Insert the needle at a 90° angle to the skin with a quick is recommended in women weighing more than 200 lbs (91 kg) or thrust.
    [Show full text]
  • Intramuscular Injections: GUIDELINES for BEST PRACTICE B
    2.1 ANCC Contact Hours Abstract The administration of injec- tions is a fundamental nursing skill; however, it is not without risk. Children receive numer- ous vaccines, and pediatric nurses administer the major- ity of these vaccines via the intramuscular route, and thus must be knowledgeable about safe and evidence-based immunization programs. Nurses may not be aware of the potential consequences associated with poor injection practices, and historically have relied on their basic nursing training or the advice of colleagues as a substitute for newer evidence about how to administer injections today. Evidence-based nursing practice requires pediatric nurses to review current literature to establish best practices and thus improved patient outcomes. Key words: Child; Evidence-based nursing; Injection intramuscu- lar; Vaccination. AbbyPediatric Rishovd, DNP, PNP Intramuscular Injections: GUIDELINES FOR BEST PRACTICE B. Boissonnet / BSIP SA / Alamy Alamy / B. Boissonnet / BSIP SA March/April 2014 MCN 107 Copyright © 2014 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. ver the past decade, the childhood vaccine (2011), and the World Health Organization (2004) have schedule has increased in complexity. De- now all strongly discouraged the practice of aspirating for pending upon the combinations adminis- blood when administering an IM injection. A randomized tered, children now may receive as many control trial found that the standard injection technique as 24 immunizations via intramuscular consisting of slow aspiration and injection followed by O(IM) injection by 2 years of age (Centers withdrawal of the needle was more painful and took lon- for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2011). Pedi- ger than rapid injection without aspiration (Ipp, Taddio, atric nurses administer the majority of injections and thus Sam, Gladbach, & Parkin, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Aerosol Delivery Devices for Respiratory Therapists 4Th Edition
    A Guide To Aerosol Delivery Devices for Respiratory Therapists 4th Edition Douglas S. Gardenhire, EdD, RRT-NPS, FAARC Dave Burnett, PhD, RRT, AE-C Shawna Strickland, PhD, RRT-NPS, RRT-ACCS, AE-C, FAARC Timothy R. Myers, MBA, RRT-NPS, FAARC Platinum Sponsor Copyright ©2017 by the American Association for Respiratory Care A Guide to Aerosol Delivery Devices for Respiratory Therapists, 4th Edition Douglas S. Gardenhire, EdD, RRT-NPS, FAARC Dave Burnett, PhD, RRT, AE-C Shawna Strickland, PhD, RRT-NPS, RRT-ACCS, AE-C, FAARC Timothy R. Myers, MBA, RRT-NPS, FAARC With a Foreword by Timothy R. Myers, MBA, RRT-NPS, FAARC Chief Business Officer American Association for Respiratory Care DISCLOSURE Douglas S. Gardenhire, EdD, RRT-NPS, FAARC has served as a consultant for the following companies: Westmed, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim. Produced by the American Association for Respiratory Care 2 A Guide to Aerosol Delivery Devices for Respiratory Therapists, 4th Edition American Association for Respiratory Care, © 2017 Foreward Aerosol therapy is considered to be one of the corner- any) benefit from their prescribed metered-dose inhalers, stones of respiratory therapy that exemplifies the nuances dry-powder inhalers, and nebulizers simply because they are of both the art and science of 21st century medicine. As not adequately trained or evaluated on their proper use. respiratory therapists are the only health care providers The combination of the right medication and the most who receive extensive formal education and who are tested optimal delivery device with the patient’s cognitive and for competency in aerosol therapy, the ability to manage physical abilities is the critical juncture where science inter- patients with both acute and chronic respiratory disease as sects with art.
    [Show full text]
  • Injecting with a Vial and Syringe | Lantus (Insulin Glargine Injection)
    INJECTING LANTUS® WITH A VIAL AND SYRINGE BEFORE YOU GET STARTED: • Wash your hands. • Make sure the insulin is clear and colorless. Do not use it if it is cloudy or if you see particles; throw it away. • Do not mix or dilute Lantus® with any other insulin or solution. It will not work as intended, and you may lose blood sugar control. • Do not share needles, insulin pens, or syringes with others. Do NOT reuse needles. Always use a new syringe. • Relax. STEP 1: PREPARE THE DOSE • Remove the cap—If you are using a new vial, remove the protective cap. Do not remove the stopper. • Sterilize the top—Wipe the top of the vial with an alcohol swab. • Inject air into the vial—Draw air into the syringe that is equal to your insulin dose. • Put the needle through the rubber top of the vial and push the plunger to inject the air into the vial. • Draw up the dose—Leave the syringe in the vial and turn both upside down. Hold the syringe and vial firmly in one hand. Make sure the tip of the needle is in the insulin. With your free hand, pull the plunger to withdraw the correct dose into the syringe. STEP 2: REMOVE AIR BUBBLES • Check for bubbles—Before you take the needle out of the vial, check the syringe for air bubbles. • Tap to release—If bubbles are in the medicine, hold the syringe straight up and tap the side of the syringe until the bubbles float to the top. • Eject the air—Push the bubbles out with the plunger and draw insulin back in until you have the correct dose.
    [Show full text]
  • Infusion/Injection Coding Education Injection/Infusion Hierarchy for Facility Reporting
    INFUSION/INJECTION CODING EDUCATION INJECTION/INFUSION HIERARCHY FOR FACILITY REPORTING Chemotherapy Infusion Chemotherapy IV Push Chemotherapy Injection Therapeutic, Prophylactic, or Diagnostic Infusions Therapeutic, Prophylactic, or Diagnostic IV Push Therapeutic, Prophylactic, or Diagnostic Injections Hydration 2 INFUSION/INJECTION DECISION TREE How long did it take? How was it given? What did the patient receive? Why is the patient here? 3 TIME DOCUMENTATION IS CRITICAL • Time Documentation is Critical • Drug administration codes are services that reference time and are “time- based” codes • Documentation should support the services reported • Therapeutic Infusions Hydration • 1st Hour 16-90 minutes 31-90 minutes • 2nd Hour 91-150 minutes 91-150 minutes • 3rd Hour 151-210 minutes 151-210 minutes • Best Practice – document “start” and “stop” times for infusions • Noridian Drugs, Biologicals, and Injections Documentation Requirements indicate: • Medication Administration Record (MAR) from date(s) of service that include name of medications(s), dose, route of administration and infusion start and stop times, if applicable 4 INITIAL SERVICE • “Initial” service is described as “the service that best describes the key or primary reason for the encounter” • Order of service delivery does not determine what is “initial” service • Hierarchy does not apply to Subcutaneous/Intramuscular injections • Only one per patient encounter UNLESS: • Two separate IV sites are medically used/necessary • Patient returns for a separate and medically necessary and reasonable encounter on the same day • These may be reported with two initial services with a modifier -59 (XE) on the second IV or second encounter 5 INITIAL SERVICE • IV Push with Hydration – What is the “initial” service? • When you bill IV hydration along with IV pushes, always report the IV push as the initial code.
    [Show full text]
  • Injection Guide Overview and Goals of This Guide ����������������������������������� 1
    Injection Guide Overview and goals of this guide . 1 Overview of injections. 3 Why did my doctor choose an injectable medication? ��������������� 3 Differences between injectable medication and oral medication . 3 Types of injections. 4 Parts of a syringe ��������������������������������������������������� 4 Steps for injecting medication ��������������������������������������� 5 Storage ������������������������������������������������������������� 5 Preparation ��������������������������������������������������������� 6 Wash your hands ����������������������������������������������� 6 Prepare your medication for injection ��������������������������� 7 Prepare the injection site ��������������������������������������� 8 Injection ����������������������������������������������������������� 9 Intramuscular injection ����������������������������������������� 9 Subcutaneous injection ����������������������������������������10 Disposal. .11 Monitoring of the injection site ����������������������������� 12 References . .13 Injection-site records ������������������������������������������������14 Overview and goals of this guide This guide is a quick reference on how to use medications that are given by injection. It gives step-by-step instructions for preparing and injecting the medication. It also covers safety precautions. The instructions in this guide apply whether you are giving the injection to someone you care for or you are giving the injection to yourself. This guide is not meant to replace instructions from your doctor nor the information
    [Show full text]
  • Intravenous Infusions And/Or Injections
    TUE Physician Guidelines Medical Information to Support the Decisions of TUECs INTRAVENOUS INFUSIONS Intravenous Infusions and/or Injections 1. Introduction Intravenous (IV) infusions have been included on the WADA List of Prohibited Substances and Methods under section M2. Prohibited Methods; Chemical and Physical Manipulation since 20051. An IV infusion or injection is the supply of fluid and/or prescribed medication by drip or push directly into a vein. Intravenous infusions are prohibited both in-competition and out-of-competition if the volume delivered exceeds 100 ml within a 12-hour period. The wording in the 2018 Prohibited List states that the following is prohibited: Intravenous infusions and/or injections of more than a total of 100 ml per 12-hour period except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital treatments, surgical procedures or clinical diagnostic investigations1. The wording in the Prohibited List for IV infusions is unique in that the method is not prohibited under the three exceptions stated above. However, a TUE may be necessary for a Prohibited Substance delivered by intravenous infusion even if the infusion itself is delivered in the setting of one of the three exceptions. IV infusions are included on the Prohibited List mainly because some athletes could use this Prohibited Method to: a) enhance their performance by increasing plasma volume levels; b) mask the use of a Prohibited Substance; c) distort the values of their Athlete Biological Passport. Infusions or injections of 100 ml or less within a 12-hour period are permitted unless the infused/injected substance is on the Prohibited List.
    [Show full text]