DOCSLIB.ORG

A CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd Merger - Really?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd Merger - Really? 7/13/2018 A CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd merger - really? (/) Home (/) > News > Europe (/news/europe.html) > A CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd merger - really? A CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd merger - really? (/media/k2/items/cache/a87aa8bc3ee2e8fe8da5fa992c06ee2f_XL.jpg) Photo: CMA CGM A week ago we wrote that the latest round of consolidation in the container shipping sector appeared largely complete with regulatory approval for Cosco Shipping to buy Orient Overseas International Ltd (OOIL), but yesterday up pops the story that CMA CGM had approached rival Hapag- Lloyd on a stock-for-stock merger. The Reuters story quoted financial sources that the idea was for a non-cash merger, as well as quoting a Hapag-Lloyd spokesman that. “These are market rumours without substance”. So is this just another silly season story, or could there be something here that makes a bit more actual sense? http://www.seatrade-maritime.com/news/europe/a-cma-cgm-and-hapag-lloyd-merger-really.html 1/7 7/13/2018 A CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd merger - really? The idea that CMA CGM approached Hapag-Lloyd about a merger does not seem out of the realms of possibility. The company has continued to be active consolidation on both a large scale acquiring Neptune Orient Lines (NOL) in 201 and on a smaller, niche scale recently announcing plans to buy Finnish line Containerships. CMA CGM chairman and ceo Rodolphe Saade has also made it clear the company sees a continued role in industry consolidation. Read more: CMA CGM to buy Containerships strengthening its intra-Europe business (http://bit.ly/2NFdM9d) In addition industry sources indicate that over the last couple of years CMA CGM has continued to make approaches to other companies in the sector over possible M&A transactions. With the rapid consolidation that the market has seen CMA CGM will actually slip to fourth in global rankings of container lines once Cosco Shipping’s acquisition of OOIL is complete. To further jump up the rankings in terms of size leaves increasingly limited options, particularly on any major scale. As either the fifth or sixth largest container line, seemingly dependent on what month it is, Hapag-Lloyd in pure numerical terms makes a fairly obvious choice with the combined entity becoming the world’s largest container line with 4.23m teu in capacity, and 19% market share, based on figures from Alphaliner. However, both companies have been through transactions recently – CMA CGM with NOL, and Hapag- Lloyd with CSAV and United Arab Shipping Co (UASC). Not only are both probably still digesting these moves it limits the ability to finance a major deal – therefore though an all-stock transaction would make sense. (http://bit.ly/2ItaeDP) However, the mechanics of a merger get rather more complex. With the various consolidation moves both companies have undertaken the Franco-Germanic merger would in fact be a near global meeting of cultures spanning Asia, Middle East, the Americas and Europe. Moreover both companies have been dominant in transactions they have undertaken while adopting different approaches to integration. CMA CGM has maintained brands such ANL and NOL’s APL brand, while names such as CP Ships acquired by Hapag-Lloyd simply disappeared. Numerically CMA CGM would be the larger, therefore dominant party in a merger, would that be acceptable to Hapag-Lloyd and its shareholders? There would also be the issue of regulatory approvals. Update: Hapag-Lloyd shareholder Klaus-Michael Kühne rejects CMA CGM merger proposal (http://bit.ly/2zrm7KC) The reality is it looks rather unlikely, but in the rapidly evolving landscape of container shipping the phrase “never say never” springs to mind. http://www.seatrade-maritime.com/news/europe/a-cma-cgm-and-hapag-lloyd-merger-really.html 2/7 7/13/2018 A CMA CGM and Hapag-Lloyd merger - really? Posted 10 July 2018 © Copyright 2018 Seatrade (UBM (UK) Ltd). Replication or redistribution in whole or in part is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Seatrade. Marcus Hand (/editor/marcus-hand.html) Editor, Seatrade Maritime News (https://ubm.seatrademaritimeevents. newsletter-5/) Published in Europe (/news/europe.html) Americas (/news/americas.html) Asia (/news/asia.html) Middle East & Africa (/news/middle-east-africa.html) Containers (/sectors/containers.html) Finance & Insurance (/sectors/finance-and-insurance.html) Dispatches (/news/dispatches.html) News Emails (/news/europe/content/news-emails.html) http://www.seatrade-maritime.com/news/europe/a-cma-cgm-and-hapag-lloyd-merger-really.html 3/7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 47/Friday, March 9, 2018/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 47 / Friday, March 9, 2018 / Notices 10481 waiver shall respond to comments Interested parties may submit comments Nippon Yusen Kaisha into a new received and shall provide reasons for on the agreements to the Secretary, company known as Ocean Network the ASC’s finding. The order shall be Federal Maritime Commission, Express Pte. Ltd. effective April 1, 2018. published promptly in the Federal Washington, DC 20573, within twelve Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. is Register, though in the case of an order days of the date this notice appears in added as a party. In addition, the granting a waiver, only after approval by the Federal Register. Copies of the Amendment adds Yang Ming (UK) Ltd. the FFIEC. agreements are available through the as a party (operating as a single party Commission’s website (www.fmc.gov) or with Yang Ming Marine Transport II. Request for Temporary Waiver; by contacting the Office of Agreements Corp.). Received Request at (202) 523–5793 or tradeanalysis@ Agreement No.: 012472–001. On November 20, 2017, a letter fmc.gov. Title: Yang Ming/COSCO Shipping requesting consideration of a temporary Agreement No.: 011830–012. Slot Exchange Agreement. waiver was received by the ASC from Title: Indamex Cross Space Charter, Parties: COSCO Shipping Lines Co., TriStar Bank, a state-chartered bank Sailing and Cooperative Working Ltd. and Yang Ming Marine Transport located in Dickson, Tennessee (the Agreement. Corporation. Requester). On November 30, 2017, ASC Parties: CMA CGM S.A.; Hapag-Lloyd Filing Party: Robert Magovern; Cozen staff replied by letter to the Requester, AG; Nippon Yusen Kaisha; and Orient O’Connor; 1200 19th Street NW; in which ASC staff described the Overseas Container Line Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Factbook 2011
    ◇◆◇◆◇◆ ＩＮＤＥＸ ◆◇◆◇◆◇ 1. Management Plan and Improvement of Business Structure 3-5. Emerging Markets (China) ④ Chinese Economic Disparities between Regions P21 1-1. "K"Line Vision 100 General View (as Announced in April 2008) P1 ⑤ Gap of the No. of Durable Goods Owned between Urban and Rural Area 1-2. April 2011, "K"Line Vision 100 ①Review of the Mid-term Management Plan KV100 P2 4. Bulk Carrier Business -New Challenges- ②Target for Financial Index 4-1. "K"Line Fleet ① "K"Line Dry Bulk Fleet P22 ③Trends of Business Performance (P/L) P3 ② "K"Line Energy Transportation Fleet ④Improvement in Financial Position ③ Ship Price as of Placing Order (Dry Bulkers, Tankers) ⑤Changes in Income and Major Financial Indicators ④ Ship Price as of Completion (Dry Bulkers, Tankers) ⑥Fleet Upgrading Plan and Investment P4 4-2. Drybulk Business Expansion into the World P23 ⑦Fleet Size Transition 4-3. Demand on Dry Bulk ① Transition of Crude Steel Production P24 ⑧New Buildings (Results and Plan) ② Global Main Trades of Coal P25 1-3. Trends of Financial Indices ①Net Income and Dividend per Share P5 ③ World Coal Consumption ②Consolidated ROE/ROA ④ Iron Ore Import into Major Asian Countries ③Consolidated Assets Turnover ⑤ Iron Ore Stocks at Chinese Ports ④Consolidated EV/EBITDA ⑥ BDI & Port Congestion in Australia ⑤Operating Cash Flow 5. Car Carrier Business ⑥Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio 5-1. Fleet and Cargo Movements ① "K"Line PCC Fleet P26 1-4. History of Management Plans P6 ② Cars/Trucks Transported by Our Fleet 1-5. Effort for Structural Reform ①No. of Seafarers/ "K"Line Employee P7 ③ Total Cars/Trucks Exported from Japan ②Our Fleet Scale, Revenures & Ordinary Income 5-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Position in the Industry[111KB/2Pages]
    Market Position in the Industry MOL operates a large and balanced oceangoing fl eet. In terms of its total fl eet size and presence in individual market categories, MOL ranks among the world’s largest shipping companies. World Major Carriers’ Fleets (All Vessel Types) (Number of vessels) 0 200 400 600800 1,000 1,200 947 MOL (Japan) 68 NYK (Japan) COSCO (China) K Line (Japan) China Shipping (China) APM-Maersk (Denmark) Oldendorff (Germany) MSC (Switzerland) Swiss Marine (Switzerland) CMA-CGM (France) Fredriksen (Norway) Teekay (Canada) 0 20 40 6080 100 120 (Million deadweight tons (DWT)) ■■ Number of vessels ■■ Million deadweight tons (DWT) Source: MOL internal estimation based on each companies’ published data, Clarkson and Alphaliner (March 2015) World Major Carriers’ Revenue Portfolio by Segment (%) 0 2040608010047 43 10 MOL NYK K Line APM-Maersk COSCO NOL OOIL MISC Frontline Teekay Pacifi c Basin Golar LNG ■ Bulkships ■ Containerships and related business ■ Other businesses Source: MOL calculations based on each company’s fi nancial statements and/or news. MOL’s containerships and related business includes revenue from Containerships, Terminals and Logistics. NYK’s containerships and related business includes revenue from Containerships, Air freighters and Logistics. APM-Maersk’s containerships and related business includes revenue from Terminal business. COSCO’s containerships and related business includes revenue from Terminal business. 38 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines 115mol_英文0723入稿PDF.indd5mol_英文0723入稿PDF.indd 3838 22015/07/23015/07/23 117:337:33
    [Show full text]
  • APL (Also See ANL & CMA) MC's Need to Call Equipment Control on Waivers Or RRG Approvals 757/961-2574 Dispute Contact PSW
    Frequently Called Equipment Providers as of 09/16/2021 and how they receive updates APL (also see ANL & MC’s need to call Equipment Control on Waivers or RRG 757/961-2574 Internet CMA) Approvals Dispute Contact [email protected] 866/574-1364 Equipment East [email protected] 757/961-2102 Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston, Buffalo, Charleston, Charlotte, Greensboro, Greer, Jacksonville, Memphis, Miami, Nashville, New York, Norfolk, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Richmond, Savannah, Tampa. Equipment Midwest & [email protected] 757/961-2105 Gulf Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dallas, Detroit, Houston, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Loredo, Louisville, Minneapolis, Mobile, New Orleans, Omaha, Rochelle, San Antonio, Santa Teresa. Equipment West [email protected] 602/586-4940 Denver, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Oakland, Phoenix, Portland, Salt Lake City, Seattle, Tacoma. Special Equipment (US) [email protected] 757/961-2600 Equipment Canada (Dry & [email protected] 514/908-7866 Special) Calgary, Edmonton, Halifax, Montreal, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Saskatoon, St. John/New Brunswick, Toronto, Vancouver, Winnipeg. LAX/LGB [email protected] Or [email protected] 562/624-5676 Long Beach, Los Angeles. City Code for Emails- Dallas: USDAL-El Paso: USELP-Houston: USHOU- Mobile: Please add City Code to USMOB- New Orleans: USMSY- San Antonio: USSAT- Santa subject line on your Tereas: USSXT emails for CMA and APL Atlanta:USATL-Baltimore:USBAL-Boston:USBOS- Bessemer:USBMV-Buffalo: USBUF-Chicago:USCHI- Cincinnatti:USCVG-Charleston:USCHS-Charlotte:USCLT- Cleveland: USCLE-Columbus:USCMH-Denver:USDEN- Detroit: USDET-Greensboro: USGBO-Indianapolis: USIND- Jacksonville:USJAX-Joliet: USJOT-Kansas City:USKCK- Laredo:USLRD-Louisville:USLUI-Los Angeles:USLAX- Memphis:USMEM-Miami:USMIA-Minneapolis:USMES- Nashville:USBNA-New York:USNYC-Norfolk:USORF- Oakland:USOAK-Omaha:USOMA-Phildelphia:USPHL- Phoenix:USPHX-Pittsburgh:USPIT-Portland:USPDX-Salt Lake City: USSLC-Savannah:USSAV-Seattle:USSEA-St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last 23 Years Progression of Asia-Europe Carrier Alliances
    The Last 23 Years Progression of Asia-Europe Carrier Alliances Number of Providers Grand Alliance Global Alliance 1996 Tricon-Hanjin Hapag-Lloyd Nedlloyd HMM DSR-Senator OOCL Maersk MSC CMA COSCO K Line Evergreen NYK 23 Sea-Land Yangming Choyang LLoyd Triestino MISC Norasia Hanjin NOL APL P&O MOL Grand Alliance Global Alliance 1997 CYK Consortium Hapag-Lloyd Nedlloyd Maersk MSC COSCO Evergreen OOCL HMM CMA NYK MISC 20 Sea-Land Norasia K Line LLoyd Triestino NOL Yangming APL P&O MOL Grand Alliance New World 1998 CKY Consortium United Alliance Hapag-Lloyd Alliance COSCO Choyang NYK Maersk MSC Norasia Evergreen APL 21 Sea-Land CMA K Line Hanjin-Senator LLoyd Triestino OOCL MOL Yangming UASC MISC P&O Nedlloyd HMM 1999-2000 Grand Alliance New World Maersk- CKY Consortium United Alliance Evergreen-LT Hapag-Lloyd Alliance Sealand COSCO Choyang NYK MSC Norasia APL 19 Maersk acquired CMA CGM K Line Hanjin-Senator OOCL MOL Sea-Land Yangming UASC MISC P&O Nedlloyd HMM United Alliance Grand Alliance New World 2001 CKY Consortium CSCL Hanjin-Senator Evergreen-LT Hapag-Lloyd Alliance COSCO NYK Maersk- MSC CMA CGM UASC APL 20 Sealand Zim K Line CSAV Norasia OOCL MOL Yangming Choyang Bankrupt MISC P&O Nedlloyd HMM 2002-2004 Grand Alliance CKYH Alliance Evergreen-LT New World CSCL COSCO Hapag-Lloyd Alliance NYK Maersk- MSC CMA CGM UASC K Line APL 20 Sealand OOCL Zim Yangming MISC MOL Hanjin-Senator CSAV Norasia P&O Nedlloyd HMM CKYH Alliance Grand Alliance New World 2005 Maersk- CSCL Evergreen-LT COSCO Hapag-Lloyd Alliance Sealand MSC CMA CGM UASC K Line
    [Show full text]
  • PAUL KENT, PHD Senior Vice President/Global Advisor for Ports and Logistics Nathan Associates Inc
    EASTERN PA FREIGHT SUMMIT Global Logistics Drivers and Implications for Freight Logistics 21-22 June 2018 PAUL KENT, PHD Senior Vice President/Global Advisor for Ports and Logistics Nathan Associates Inc. [email protected]/+1-703-516-7830 Importance of Ports • Important (English) • Importante (Italian, Spanish, Portuguese) • Important (French, Romanian) 2 Strategic Drivers Shaping Logistics Global Economy and Trade Growth • Gap between GDP growth and trade 0.2 growth narrowing 0.15 0.1 • Excess fleet capacity/liner 0.05 concentration 0 • Global urban population growth 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 -0.05 • Disruptive technologies -0.1 TEU Growth GDP Growth 4 Liner Consolidation Year of Formation Q4 2009 Q1 2012 Q2 2015 Q2 2017 NWA G6 Alliance G6 Alliance THE Alliance • New and larger alliances APL/NOL APL/NOL APL/NOL MOL MOL MOL MOL K-Line emerging, largely driven HMM HMM HMM NYK Line Grand Alliance IV Hapaq-Lloyd Hapaq-Lloyd Yang Ming by excess capacity Hapag-Lloyd NYK Line NYK Line Hapag-Lloyd NYK OOCL OOCL Ocean Alliance • Of top 20 carriers, only 2 OOCL CKYH CKYHE CMA CGM have not joined an CKYH Hanjin Hanjin COSCO CS Hanjin K-Line K-Line OOCL alliance, with Maersk K-Line Yang Ming Yang Ming Evergreen Yang Ming COSCO COSCO 2M recently acquiring COSCO MSC/CMA CGM Evergreen MSC MSC 2M Maersk Line Hamburg Sud CMA CGM MSC HMM Maersk Line • Top 5 carriers control 62% Ocean Three CMA CGM of container trades China Shipping • Increased from 44% just 4 UASC years ago Top 20 Carriers Not Part of Alliance Maersk Line Maersk Line PIL, Zim Line PIL, Zim Line MSC Hamburg Sud Hamburg Sud CMA CGM Wan Hai Wan Hai Evergreen Evergreen Source: Notteboom, Theo, PortEconomics, Rounds of alliance formation in container shipping, May 2016, revised by Nathan 5 Associates Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport 2016 Review of Maritime Transport
    UNCTAD UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT For further information on UNCTAD’s work REVIEW on trade logistics, please visit: http://unctad.org/ttl OF MARITIME and for the TRANSPORT Review of Maritime Transport 2016: http://unctad.org/rmt E-mail: 2016 [email protected] To read more and to subscribe to the UNCTAD Transport Newsletter, please visit: http://unctad.org/transportnews 2016 UNITED NATIONS ISBN 978-92-1-112904-5 Layout and printed at United Nations, Geneva 1623510 (E)–November 2016 – 2,102 UNCTAD/RMT/2016 United Nations publication Sales No. E.16.II.D.7 : © Jan Hoffmann Photo credit UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2016 New York and Geneva, 2016 ii REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2016 NOTE The Review of Maritime Transport is a recurrent publication prepared by the UNCTAD secretariat since 1968 with the aim of fostering the transparency of maritime markets and analysing relevant developments. Any factual or editorial corrections that may prove necessary, based on comments made by Governments, will be reflected in a corrigendum to be issued subsequently. * * * Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Use of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. * * * The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport 2014
    UNCTAD UNITED N ATIONS CONFERENC E ON T RADE A ND D EVELOPMENT For further information on UNCTAD’s work REVIEW OF MA on trade logistics, please visit: http://unctad.org/ttl REVIEW and for the Review of Maritime Transport 2014: OF MARITIME http://unctad.org/rmt E-mail: TRANSPORT [email protected] To read more and to subscribe to the UNCTAD Transport Newsletter, please visit: R 2014 http://unctad.org/transportnews ITI M E TR ANSPO R T 2014 UNITED NATIONS ISBN 978-92-1-112878-9 Layout and printed at United Nations, Geneva 1418912 (E)–November 2014–2,062 UNCTADRMT2014 United Nations publication Sales No. E.14.II.D.5 : © Jan Hoffmann Photo credit UNITED N ATIONS CONFERENC E ON T RADE A ND D EVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2014 New York and Geneva, 2014 ii REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2014 NOTE The Review of Maritime Transport is a recurrent publication prepared by the UNCTAD secretariat since 1968 with the aim of fostering the transparency of maritime markets and analysing relevant developments. Any factual or editorial corrections that may prove necessary, based on comments made by Governments, will be reflected in a corrigendum to be issued subsequently. * * * Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Use of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. * * * The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
    INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS * * * Three-month period ended March 31, 2017 The accompanying notes are part of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements. Contents Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Profit & Loss ........................................................................... 3 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income .......................................................... 4 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position - Assets ....................................................... 5 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position - Liabilities & Equity .................................... 6 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of changes in Equity ..................................................................... 7 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows .............................................................................. 8 Notes to the Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements ............................................................... 9 Note 1 - Corporate information .................................................................................................................. 9 Note 2 - General accounting principles ....................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Basis of preparation ................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Change
    [Show full text]
  • Hapag Lloyd / Hamburg Sud Hapag Lloyd Thea
    CONTAINER SERVICES BERTH WINDOW SCHEDULE Last Updated August 3, 2021 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30* 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 Berth 5 TP1 TP9 CPNW - OCEAN TP1 WSL CENTERM Berth 6 Barge WSL Barge (2) Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30* 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 Berth CFNX PNW3 - OCEAN PNW1 - OCEAN CFNX Berth VANTERM Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30* 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 Berth ZP9 PNW4 - OCEAN ALLIANCE CHIN ZP9 Berth PN4- THEA PN1 - THEA PN4 DELTAPORT Berth PN3 - THEA PN2 - THEA PN3 - THEA Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30* 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 1:00 8:00 16:30 Berth 7 WSN** AL5 Barge PNS MedPac FRASER FRASER SURREY Berth 8 TP Alaska** TP Alaska** L I N E / C O N S O R T I U M S e r v i c e N a m e HAPAG LLOYD / HAMBURG SUD SM LINE MedPac (Mediterranean Pacific Service) PNS (Pacific Northwest Service) Hapag Lloyd, Hamburg Sud/ Maersk and ZIM SM Line, MSC HAPAG LLOYD THEA - THE (Transport High Efficiency) Alliance WSN (Oceania) PN1 (Pacific Northwest) Hapag Lloyd, Hamburg Sud/ Maersk and CMA-CGM, and MSC Hapag Lloyd, Yang Ming, Ocean Network Express, HMM PN2 (Pacific Northwest) MAERSK Hapag Lloyd, Yang Ming, Ocean
    [Show full text]
  • All Inland Destination (Northern and Midwest) Serviced Via Halifax for Canada
    CMA-CGM Group Indian Sub-Continent CMA-CGM Agencies (India) Pvt Ltd. Table of Contents Ports Agencies & Services Logistics Indian Sub-Continent Last update: Jun 25th 2020 Group Applications (LARA, LISA, OCEAN, GAIA, QIRA) 2 Ports DELHI 6 Gateway ports MUNDRA KANDLA HAZIRA KOLKATA PIPAVAV HALDIA DHAMRA Feeder ports PARADIP 9 NHAVA SHEVA VISAKAPATNAM (VIZAG) MORMUGAO KRISHNAPATNAM KATTUPALLI MANGALORE ENNORE Click on the port to access CHENNAI more information. COCHIN TUTICORIN VIZHINJAM COLACHEL Feeder ports Last update: Jun 25th 2020 Gateway ports ↖ Table of Contents CC is not operating Under development Mundra – Adani – Terminal 1 INMUN - Mundra International Container Terminal or CT1 (MICT) Port information MICT • Distance from Pilot station to berth 3 miles • Time from Pilot station to berth 1.50 hour • Min Depth 13.8 meters • Max allowed vessel draft 16.5 meters • Total length of berth 632 meters • Max vessel size 367 m x 48 m AICTPL Quay and Yard equipment • Quay cranes 6 (2 PP + 4 SPP) • Max outreach 19 Rows • SWL Spreader/hook 40-60 / 100 Tons • Stacking area 240,000 Sq. meters • Capacity 1.35 Million TEUs • Utilization % 93.0% (FY 2016-17) Rail Connectivity from ICDs: • Handling equipment type RTG CMA-CGM Services • Reefer plugs 242 plugs KHODIYAR – SACHANA - SANAND – TUGHLAKABAD – MIDAS 2 PATPARGANJ - DADRI – GHARI HARSARU - LONI – PATLI – Out of Gauge (OOG) restrictions Wed 4AM– Wed 7PM PIYALA - MORADABAD – FARIDABAD – KATHUWAS – PANTNAGAR - SONIPAT – SAMALKHA – LUDHIANA (DHANDARIKALANA, SAHNEWAL, KANECH, CHAWA) – • Maximum
    [Show full text]
  • CMA CGM Japan Inform Our Customer of CNC IA2 Service Change As Below ;
    June 2020 IA2 Service Change Dear Valued Customer, CMA CGM Japan inform our customer of CNC IA2 Service change as below ; Service : IA2 < REVISED > Effective vessel MCC Qingdao 026S/0IA65S1NC (ETA Tokyo 24th June, 2020) Port Transit Day Arrive Depart Terminal NIPPON YUSEN TOKYO CONTAINER TOKYO 0 Wed Thu TERMINAL YOKOHAMA 1 Thu Thu MAERSK YOKOHAMA TERMINAL NAGOYA 2 Fri Sat TOBISHIMA MINAMI TERMINAL 93/94 KOBE 3 Sat Sun KOBE ROKKO TERMINAL XIAMEN PORT GROUP HAITIAN XIAMEN 7 Wed Wed CONTAINER TERMINAL HONG KONG 8 Thu Thu HONG KONG MODERN TERMINALS LTD HO CHI MINH CITY 11 Sun Mon CAT LAI TERMINAL PELABUHAN TANJUNG PELEPAS TANJUNG PELEPAS 14 Wed Thu TERMINAL SINGAPORE 15 Thu Thu PSA SINGAPORE TERMINAL LAEM CHABANG 18 Sun Mon LAEM CHABANG PORT A0 HONG KONG 23 Fri Sat HONG KONG MODERN TERMINALS LTD NIPPON YUSEN TOKYO CONTAINER TOKYO 28 Wed TERMINAL ⚫ Add Tanjung Pelepas & Singapore calls ⚫ Change position of Xiamen, Hong Kong & Ho Chi Minh City th CMA CGM (Japan) K.K. 9 floor, Tradepia Odaiba, 2-3-1, Daiba, Minato-ku, Tokyo 135-0091 1/2 <ORIGINAL> Transit Port Arrive Depart Terminal Day NIPPON YUSEN TOKYO CONTAINER TOKYO 0 Wed Thu TERMINAL YOKOHAMA 1 Thu Thu MAERSK YOKOHAMA TERMINAL NAGOYA 2 Fri Sat TOBISHIMA MINAMI TERMINAL 93/94 KOBE 3 Sat Sun KOBE ROKKO TERMINAL TAICHUNG 6 Tue Wed CHINA CONTAINER TERMINAL XIAMEN PORT GROUP HAITIAN XIAMEN 8 Thu Thu CONTAINER TERMINAL HONG 9 Fri Sat HONG KONG MODERN TERMINALS LTD KONG YANTIAN INTERNATIONAL CONT YANTIAN 10 Sat Sun TERMINAL HO CHI 14 Wed Thu CAT LAI TERMINAL MINH CITY LAEM 18 Sun Mon LAEM CHABANG PORT A0 CHABANG HONG 23 Fri Sat HONG KONG MODERN TERMINALS LTD KONG NIPPON YUSEN TOKYO CONTAINER TOKYO 28 Wed TERMINAL ⚫ Omit Taichung & Yantian calls We thank you for your business and continued support.
    [Show full text]