National Rivers Authority Thames Region November 1994 CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLANNING

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Rivers Authority Thames Region November 1994 CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLANNING NRA Thamet 2 NRA National Rivers Authority Thames Region November 1994 CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLANNING THE CONCEPT WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES The rivers, lakes, estuaries and coastal waters of The Water Resources Act (1991) allows the England and Wales have never before been subject to Government to set Statutory Water Quality Objectives such extensive and rapidly increasing demands. The (SWQOs). These will replace the non-statutory River National Rivers Authority is the statutory regulator of Quality Objectives (RQOs) set in the 1970s. The the water environment and has a significant direct objectives set will be related to the uses of the water. management role. As such, the important responsibility Five such uses have been proposed. Detailed of safeguarding the water environment includes regulations have been published for one, the “Rivers reconciling conflicts between water users. Ecosystem” use, based on the suitability to support Fish populations. Implementation of these regulations by The Mission Statement of the National Rivers Authority Government is awaited. expresses the following principles: We will protect and Improve the water environment by the effective management of water resources and by substantial reductions in pollution. We will aim to provide effective defence for people and property against flooding from rivers and sea. In discharging our duties we will operate openly and balance the interests of all who benefit from and use rivers, groundwaters, estuaries and coastal waters. We will be businesslike, efficient and caring towards our em ployees. Catchment Management Plans translate these principles into action. The plans describe the vision for each catchment, identify problems and issues and propose actions that may be taken to resolve them. The plans also provide the means of promoting two key aspects of environmental management - land use planning and water quality objectives. BLACKWATER CATCHMENT GENERAL FEATURES KEY * o Catchment Area --------- Local Authority Boundary Basingstoke Canal SCALE (approx) 0 5 Ion -I 1 VISION FOR THE CATCHMENT The impact of human activities, ranging from The proposed actions set out in this Final Plan intensive development to agriculture, has been represent a firm commitment to embark upon detrimental in varying degrees to the environment of securing the comprehensive protection and the Blackwater and its tributaries. enhancement of the natural water environment of the catchment. These proposed actions alone will The National Rivers Authority’s vision for the not achieve the vision. However, they will form a Blackwater catchment comprises the following: sound basis for further actions in the future and • Reverse the decline of the water contribute towards the realization of the vision. environment and seek to restore the river corridor to a more natural state Catchment plans are dynamic documents. The in which it will become a valued asset actions will be monitored and reviewed regularly. for the whole of the community; The Blackwater Catchment Management Plan will, in any case, be subsumed within the Loddon • Secure protection and enhancement Catchment Management Plan to be prepared in of the water environment through its 1997/8. This will provide the opportunity for any own actions, in partnership with necessary revision. others and, increasingly, through the process of land use planning, implement the principles of sustainable development; • Facilitate activities by various water users in appropriate locations and balance them so as to avoid conflict, through strong links and involvement 4114th lr\r-/i / r-r\vnvY\HYlitit>S E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 006246III REVIEW OF THE CONSULTATION PROCESS A fundamental objective of Catchment Management The Consultation Document and the summary were Planning is to involve the public and all interested published in November 1992 and sent to a total of 119 parties in the planning for the future well-being of the interested parties. The consultation period extended to catchment. To meet this objective the consultation 29th January 1993 and written comments were process included a press release, a Consultation requested to be submitted by that date. Responses were Document, a summary leaflet, displays in local libraries received from 45% of those consulted. and meetings. On twelve days (between 29th November 1992 and 5th The press release, which was issued on 12th November January 1993) a display was set up in the public libraries 1992, read as follows: at Aldershot, Camberley, Farnborough, Fleet, Odiham BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT and Sandhurst. Copies of the summary document were MANAGEMENT PLAN available at the display for members of the public. Planning for tbe future of the water Following detailed analysis o f the comments received, a environment in the Blackwater River Draft Action Plan to address the issues was prepared. Catchment is the main objective for tbe NRA’s This was sent for comment to 81 key participants of latest catchment management plan. whom 57 attended a forum meeting on 17th November 1993- As a result o f representations at the meeting, the A consultation report has been sent to a wide period of consultation was extended by a month to 17th range of organisations, groups and January 1994. However, in recognition of the individuals including Parish, District and importance of such comments, responses received after County Councils. The purpose of the report is that date have been taken into consideration. to raise awareness of the way we currently use our water heritage and to plan for its The consultation exercise was helpful and productive. future use. A number of displays in libraries Not only did it afford the National Rivers Authority the and other public areas are to be organised opportunity to become more aware of the concerns of over the next two months. others but it also resulted in the Blackwaier catchment and its issues being given a higher profile. The issues Areas covered in the report include tbe and actions were confirmed as being correct and Basingstoke Canal, Blackwater Valley, Fleet appropriate. Pond and the Rivers Whitewater and Hart. 1 OVERVIEW OF THE CATCHMENT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE CATCHMENT During the period between the late 1950s and mid 1980s considerable urbanisation took place, resulting in The Blackwater River catchment comprises all land the crescent of intense development which now exists draining surface water run-off to the Blackwater River along the Blackwater Valley. At present approximately and its tributaries which include the River Whitewater, 250,000 people reside in the catchment and the good River Hart, Fleet Brook and Cove Brook. The length of road and rail communications with Central London Main River (over which the NRA has statutory powers continue to maintain pressure for further development. for flood defence) is 87 kilometres; the length of Controlled Water (monitored by the NRA for water Major variations in river water quality occur within the quality purposes) is 125 kilometres. catchment. The River Whitewater is of “high” quality and supports a natural population of brown trout. In The area covered by the catchment, which is 356 contrast, the Blackwater River is in part of “poor” square kilometres in extent, falls within the quality, although its downstream reaches are administrative boundaries of the following Local considered to be of “fair” quality. Authorities: Water bearing strata underlie the catchment and act as a County Coundls District & Borough Coundls source both of drinking water supplies and of several Hampshire Hart DC springs which feed the Whitewater and Hart Rivers. The Rushmoor BC Blackwater River is also spring fed. However, sewage Basingstoke & Deane BC effluent is the major component o f flow in the river. East Hampshire DC The Basingstoke Canal runs through the catchment from west to east close to the 75 metre ground contour. Surrey Surrey Heath BC The canal, which has been restored and reopened, now Guildford BC supports a number of Sites of Special Scientific Interest Waverley BC and is regarded by many to be of national ecological Berkshire Wokingham DC importance. Bracknell Forest BC Within the catchment there are other water dependent habitats which are designated as Sites of Special The catchment is one of contrasts. On the western side Scientific Interest. These include fens, lakes, bogs and the Rivers Whitewater and Hart drain a largely open water meadows, making this a particularly diverse and area (apart from the towns of Fleet, Hartley Wintney rich area in ecological terms. Fleet Pond, the largest and Hook), whilst on the eastern side the Blackwater freshwater lake in Hampshire, was designated as a Site River and Cove Brook drain a heavily urbanised area of Special Scientific Interest in 1951. comprising the towns of Aldershot, Camberley, Famborough, Sandhurst and Yateley. 2 SUMMARY OF CATCHMENT USES AN ACTIVITIES ECOLOGY: FISHERIES: This refers to aquatic flora and fauna along w'ith This relates specifically to the maintenance of breeding dependent organisms. Dependent organisms are plants populations of salmonid (i.e. game) and cyprinid (i.e. and animals which rely, at some stage of their life cycle, coarse) fish. The European Commission (EC) on the aquatic environment or associated land. A Freshwater Fisheries Directive, on the quality of waters healthy river corridor will be characterised by a diverse needing protection or improvement in order to support and abundant plant and animal community and a fish life, provides a statutory basis for the protection of variety of habitat types. water quality in certain rivers. The upper sections of the Blackwater River and Cove The Blackwater River, which is an EC designated Brook are extensively urbanised and the river therefore cyprinid fishery, has several sites with good fish provides an essential ecological corridor. The populations and tributaries that support wild brown Whitewater and Hart valleys are much less developed trout.
Recommended publications
  • Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement Holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small Land Owners
    Hazeley Heath Consultative Group 22/08/2017 Victoria Hall, Hartley Wintney Present: Phil Maund (Hart DC, Chair), Kathryn Steele (Hart DC, Secretary), Therese Abbott (Easement holders), John Collman (Naturalist), Lindsay Mackay (Small land owners) Apologies: Leigh Wallace (Hart DC), Mike Coates (RSPB), David Sexton (Mattingley Parish), Julian Bishop (Commoners) 1. Minutes from previous meeting Minutes were considered and approved. 2. Matters arising Hart Ponds - PM: Previously awaiting confirmation if consent is required for new ponds, consent is not required if an existing pond. Letter from Mattingley Parish - PM: Hart and RSPB are awaiting a signed letter of consent for the PINS application from Mattingley Parish Council. This has been completed via LW and MC. Natural England surveys - Action is outstanding for Matt Taylor (Natural England) to find out when the field units are due at Hazeley. ACTION: PM Bramshill crossing - PM: No change from 09/05/2017 meeting. ACTION: LW/PM Himalayan Balsam – PM: No enforcement available for neighbouring land on Hazeley streams and rivers. Hart can manage what they are responsible for. There is scope for an initiative such as volunteering to aid in the removal of Himalayan Balsam. Fencing Application – PM: HART and the RSPB have met and chose the same specification and structures. Naming of Features – JC: The features still require naming such as the scrapes. This is to be carried out during winter when there is less work on. HART and the RSPB to aid in choosing these alongside the management plan. Are these to be short coded names or site relevant names? ACTION: PM/ JC Surveys 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN April 1992 NRA National Rivers Authority Thames Region BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION DRAFT April 1992 FOREWARD The National Rivers Authority was created in 1989 to conserve and enhance the natural water environment. In our role as 'Guardians of the Water Environment' we are committed to preparing a sound and thorough plan for the future management of the region's river catchments. This Draft Catchment Management Plan is a step towards achieving that goal for the Blackwater River catchment. As a vehicle for consultation it will provide a means of seeking a consensus on the way ahead and as a planning document it will be a means of seeking commitment from all parties to realising the environmental potential of the catchment. » '' I ■ ; We look forward to receiving the contributions of those organisations and individuals involved with the river and its catchment. Les Jones Regional General Manager Kings Meadow House Kings Meadow Road Reading Berks RGl 800 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY II Tel: Reading (0734) 535000 II Telex: 849614 NRATHA G Fax: (0734) 500388 121268 Blackwater Rivet DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN A p r i l 1 9 9 2 National Rivers Authority Thames Region King's Meadow House King's Meadow Road Reading BLACKWATER RIVER DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONTENTS LIST Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The National Rivers Authority 1.1 1.2 Catchment Management Planning 1.2 2.0 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction 2.1 2.2 General Features 2.2 2.3 Topography 2.4 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Nationalgrideso UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019
    GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED GB Electricity System Operator Daily Report Tuesday 11 June 2019 Today’s High Level Risk Status Forecast for the next 24h Time General Status Voltage PSM Demand System Inertia 07:00 - 14:00 System Margins Weather Duty 14:00 - 21:00 Generation Transmission Officer 21:00 - 07:00 Active Constraints Today’s Minimum De-Rated Margin 3891.13 (SP 36) System Warnings None Generation Variable Current BMU Largest Loss Risk Demand 560MW Balancing Costs Last 241 hours'6 ENCC11 BM16 spend212631Total:36 £729k414651566166717681869196 £80k £60k £40k £20k £0k -£20k -£40k Yesterday’s Market Summary Cash out price (Max) £80.00 /MWh (SP 20) Cash Out Price (Min) £23.01 /MWh (SP 15) Peak Demand Yesterday 28,745 MW NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 2 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Interconnectors Today Import Export Netherlands (BritNed) 1060 1060 Fully Available France (IFA) 1500 1500 Pole 1 unavailable, due to RTS at 12:00hrs Belgium (Nemo) 1013 1013 Fullly Available Ireland (EWIC) 500 530 Fullly Available Northern Ireland (MOYLE) 395 500 Partially available. Wind Power Forecast Key: Expected embedded generation (MWs) Embedded Generation Forecast 10-JUN-2019 11-JUN-2019 12-JUN-2019 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 00:00 05:00 08:00 12:00 17:00 21:00 Solar (MW) 1 1640 3830 1700 46 0 0 1039 3564 2060 29 0 0 725 2193 1717 38 Wind (MW) 284 381 689 1203 1281 1361 1783 2073 2250 2137 1798 1760 1712 1706 1773 1751 1600 STOR (MW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total (MW) 285 2021 4519 2903 1327 1361 1783 3112 5814 4197 1827 1760 1712 2431 3966 3468 1638 NETS Status Report; 11 June 2019 3 of 4 nationalgridESO UNRESTRICTED Weather Source Commentary 11/05/2019 Met Office Today: (Summary) SEPA Rain, heavy at times, and strong winds will continue across much of Natural Resources Wales England and Wales, although south and southeastern parts will be brighter with lighter winds but with heavy, thundery showers developing.
    [Show full text]
  • Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan
    Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan January 2012 – FOR COMMMENT (Version C2) Glossary.....................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction...................................................................................................6 2 Loddon catchment summary.......................................................................9 2.1 General Description .....................................................................................9 2.2 Catchment map........................................................................................... 10 3 Water body information ............................................................................. 11 3.1 Classification.................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Heavily Modified Water Bodies..................................................................... 11 4 Actions ........................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Operational monitoring (2010-12) ............................................................. 12 4.2 Investigations (2010-12)............................................................................. 12 4.3 Improvement actions (in place by 2012)................................................... 12 4.3.1 ‘Day Job’ activities.............................................................................................. 13 4.3.2 Field actions ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    T h ^ j ^ c j NRA Thames 249 1‘ DATE OUT : THE BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIRST ANNUAL REVIEW 95/96 DRAFT DOCUMENT 1 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY ■ ■ 111 122688 CONTENTS Section: Page No 1.0 Executive Summary v 1.1 Thames 21 2.0 Vision for the Catchment 3.0 Introduction 4.0 Catchment Overview 5.0 Summary of Progress 5.1 Cove Brook Landscape Assessment 5.3 Environmental Impact Assessment on the Blackwater River 5.4 Water Quality 5.5 Watersports within the catchment 5.6 Pollution Incidents in the Blackwater Catchment 5.7 Oil Care Campaign 5.8 Public Involvement 6.0 Monitoring Report 6.1 Format 7.0 Additions to the Action Tables 7.1 Additional Issues 7.2 Additional Actions 8.0 Activities - (The Action Tables) 9.0 Future Reviews Appendices: I Contacts IV Water Quality II Abbreviations V Pollution Incidents III Progress of Development Plans y> NOTE : THIS PAGE IS TO CONTAIN AN APPROPRIATE STATEMENT RE :THE FORMATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY TOGETHER WITH THE NRA ’MISSION STATEMENT’. For further information regarding this CMP Review, please contact : Mark Hodgins National Rivers Authority Riverside Works Sunbury-on-Thames Middlesex TW6 6AP (Tel: 01932 789833) 3 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY One of the main objectives of an Animal Review h to record the progress of Catchment actions as identified la the Blackwater River Catchment Management Han * Final Plan (renamed the Actioultai)* The progression of activities within the catchment as of November 1994 onwards has been generally vety good* fit total there were,.* actions identfed in the Blackwater Final Plan, for the period 1994 and 1999* ,.., of these actions have been successfully completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact File RIVER BLACKWATER
    NRA Thames 167 Fact File RIVER BLACKWATER GUARDIANS OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT r * NRA Thames Region Fact File - RIVER BLACKWATER FACTS IN BRIEF The Blackwater rises to the south of Aldershot and flows in a northerly direction to its confluence with the Loddon at Swallowfield. The Blackwater catchment covers an area of 356 sq.km. The upper part of the Blackwater valley is highly urbanised and includes Aldershot, Home of the British Army, and Farnborough, home to the Royal Aircraft Establishment. The average rainfall in the Blackwater catchment is 710 mm. The fall in the river from its source to its confluence with the Loddon is 82m. From its source to its confluence with the Loddon it is approximately 37 km. THE NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY Established on 1st September 1989, the NRA is an independent public body charged with safeguarding and improving the natural water environment. It is responsible for flood defence, regulating the quality of rivers and groundwaters, balancing the needs of various water users, protecting and improving fish stocks and promoting water based recreation of all kinds. The NRA is committed to improving wildlife habitats and conserving the natural environment in all it undertakes. TRIBUTARIES The Cove Brook rises on Laffin’s Plain in Farnborough, and joins the Blackwater at Frimley. The Whitewater rises at Greywell and meets the Blackwater at Risely. The Hart has its source at Crondall, and is joined by the Fleet Brook at Hartley Wintney before its confluence with the Whitewater at Bramshill The Basingstoke Canal crosses the southern part of the Blackwater catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 Baseline Information
    Hart District Local Plan Core Strategy SA (incorporating SEA): Scoping Report, April 2014 APPENDIX 3 BASELINE INFORMATION Introduction A3.1 Hart District is a rural district covering around 21,500 hectares located in north-east Hampshire, bordering the counties of Surrey and Berkshire. Neighbouring authorities are: Basingstoke and Deane, East Hampshire, Waverley, Rushmoor, Surrey Heath, Bracknell Forest, Wokingham, and West Berkshire. A map of the District, key features and neighbouring authorities can be seen over the page in Figure A3.1. Settlements A3.2 Hart has a complex geography having several distinct towns, and a number of small rural villages (see Figure A3.1 over the page). Some of the settlements have strong links with areas outside of the District, for example Fleet, Yateley and Blackwater can be seen as part of the wider Blackwater Valley area which stretches into Berkshire and Surrey, and areas in the west of the District such as Hook may make use of services in nearby Basingstoke. A3.3 The Settlement Hierarchy LDF Background Paper1 groups Hart’s various settlements into a hierarchy based on an understanding of their current size (population) and level of service provision in the following way: Tier 1: Main Urban Areas Fleet (including Church Crookham and Elvetham Heath Tier 2: Primary Local Service Centres Blackwater (including Hawley, Frogmore and Darby Green) Yateley Hook Tier 3: Secondary Local Service Hartley Wintney Centres Odiham and North Warnborough Tier 4: Main Villages RAF Odiham Crondall Crookham Village Dogmersfield
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Information Map for Berkshire, North East Hampshire and Surrey - River Loddon Catchment
    Flood Information map for Berkshire, North East Hampshire and Surrey - River Loddon Catchment infield Sandhurst itney Fleet Brook Farnbdrou Basingstoke T44*5 EA-THAMES 3 nuuu wJarning M ap Key Information Areas liable to flood from rivers. Reach of river protected by a flood defence For Berkshire, North East scheme which has reduced the risk of flo o d in g . Hampshire and Surrey Urban Area. River Loddon Catchment River catchment b o u n d a ry . Main river (open channel River Blackwater and culvert). Cove Brook M a in Road. River Whitewater River Hart Fleet Brook E m m Brook If you would like more information contact the Environment Agency - 0118 953 5343. Environment Agency Kings Meadow House, Kings Meadow Road, Reading RG1 8DQ. En v ir o n m e n t II Ag e n c y Flood Risks in this Area Local Radio Who To Contact For Help The map on the back of this leaflet shows the rivers and streams in During A Flood your area. It also shows where floods have happened in the past, Flood warnings will be broadcast on local radio. If you where they could happen in the future and where there are flood are concerned that weather conditions may cause For information on flood warnings telephone Floodcall defences which reduce the risk of flooding. 0645 88 11 88. All calls are charged at local rates. flooding listen to : If you live close to a river or stream you should know how flood If roads are flooded due to blocked drains contact warnings will be issued in your area.
    [Show full text]
  • Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Water Cycle Study
    Water Submitted to Submitted by East Hampshire District Council AECOM Midpoint Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Water Cycle Study Final Report May 2017 AECOM Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath WCS Page A-1 Appendix A. Relevant Planning Documents to the WCS Local Authority Category Document Name Publication Relevance Date All Water Blackwater Valley Water Cycle Study Scoping Report 2011 All Environment Thames River Basin District Management Plan (RBMP) 2015 Hart Flood Risk Hart Strategic Flood Risk Assessment November 2016 2016 Rushmoor Flood Risk Rushmoor Borough Council Level 1 SFRA Update 2015 Surrey Heath Flood Risk Surrey Heath SFRA 2015 All Housing Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Strategic Housing Market 2016 Assessment (SHMA) All Employment Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath Joint Employment Land 2016 Review Surrey Heath Environment Biodiversity and Planning in Surrey 2014 Hart Environment Hart Biodiversity Action Plan 2012 - 2017 2012 Rushmoor Environment Rushmoor Biodiversity Action Plan 2016 - 2021 2016 All Environment Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area Delivery 2009 Framework Surrey Heath Water Affinity Water Final Water Resource Management Plan 2015 - 2014 2020 All Water South East Water Water Resource Management Plan 2015 - 2014 2040 All Climate United Kingdom Climate Projections 2009 (UKCP09) 2009 Change All Water Loddon abstraction licensing strategy 2013 Surrey Heath Water Thames abstraction licensing strategy 2014 Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath WCS – Final Report May 2017 AECOM Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath WCS Page B-2 Appendix B. Legislative Drivers Shaping the WCS Directive/Legislation/Guidance Description Birds Directive 2009/147/EC Provides for the designation of Special Protection Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Esso Petroleum Company, Limited
    Southampton to London Pipeline Project Volume 6 Environmental Statement (Volume D) Appendix 7.5: Aquatic Ecology Factual Report Application Document: 6.4 Planning Inspectorate Reference Number: EN070005 APFP Regulation No. 5(2)(a) Revision No. 1.0 May 2019 (This page is intentionally left blank) Southampton to London Pipeline Project Esso Petroleum Company, Limited Appendix 7.5: Aquatic Ecology Factual Report B2325300-JAC-000-ENV-REP-000084 May 2019 Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 7.5: Aquatic Ecology Factual Report Southampton to London Pipeline Project Project No: B2325300 Document Title: Appendix 7.5: Aquatic Ecology Factual Report Document No.: B2325300-JAC-000-ENV-REP-000084 Revision: R1.0 Date: May 2019 Client Name: Esso Petroleum Company, Limited Prepared by: Jacobs U.K Limited 1180 Eskdale Road Winnersh, Wokingham Reading RG41 5TU United Kingdom T +44 (0)118 946 7000 F +44 (0)118 946 7001 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Southampton to London Pipeline Project Environmental Statement Appendix 7.5: Aquatic Ecology Factual Report Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Broden Stables, Crondall
    Crondall Developments Ltd Broden Stables, Crondall Flood Risk Assessment, Surface Water & Foul Water Drainage Strategies 132739-R1(2)-FRA AUGUST 2016 RSK GENERAL NOTES Project No.: 132739-R1(2)-FRA Site: Broden Stables, Crondall Title: Flood Risk Assessment, Surface Water & Foul Water Drainage Strategies Client: Crondall Developments Ltd Date: 31st August 2016 Office: Hemel Hempstead Status: Final Author S Williams Technical reviewer M Cheeseman Signature Signature Date: 31st August 2016 Date: 31st August 2016 Project manager M Durant Project Director M Cheeseman Signature Signature Date: 31st August 2016 Date: 31st August 2016 Reviewed Approved Issue No Version/Details Date issued Author by by 1 132739-R1(0)-FRA 17th June 16 SW MD MC 2 132739-R1(1)-FRA 24th June 16 SW MD MC 3 132739-R1(2)-FRA 31st August 16 SW MD MC RSK LDE Ltd (RSK) has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement under which this work was completed. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express agreement of the client and RSK. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by RSK for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested.
    [Show full text]