DOCSLIB.ORG

Prepared For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prepared For Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Volume 8B, Marine Transportation Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Marine Commercial, Recreational and Tourism Use Technical Report 3.4 Existing Conditions For MCRTU, existing conditions represent the current use patterns and trends of commercial, recreational and tourism marine vessels and users in the Marine RSA, as identified from a review of available data, map analysis, and consultation with key informants. In the Marine RSA, human use is affected by a wide range of factors such as individual decisions, local meteorological conditions, day-to-day government decisions and regulations, changes in recreational or biophysical features, and broader economic factors. As such, all information presented in this report should be considered a snapshot of existing conditions at the time of writing based on the best available information, with the understanding that marine conditions and user trends are continually changing. The existing data on MCRTU were compiled using a variety of sources, including: • published reports from government agencies involved in administering or regulating a specified area or resource; • a review of relevant marine use planning documentation; • internet searches and related online investigations; • discussions with relevant key informants, including: provincial and federal government officials; marine-based industry associations; commercial fishing organizations; recreational use organizations, results of open houses, workshops and community meetings; • results of other Project-related technical reports, including a marine vessel traffic analysis; • a review of environmental assessments for projects with a similar marine context or regulatory context (e.g., Enbridge Northern Gateway); and • geographic information system (GIS) tools to determine spatial relationships of source data to the Marine RSA. 3.5 Desktop Literature Review The initial step in the baseline data collection process was the desktop literature review. This involved identifying and reviewing existing published data from the following sources: • provincial, regional and municipal governmental statistical and administrative data, studies and reports; • reports from academic, community-based or other non-governmental organizations active in the study area; and • environmental assessments for projects with a similar marine context or regulatory context (e.g., Enbridge Northern Gateway). Given the dynamic nature of marine use conditions and the continual flow of new information, the desktop literature review continued in an ongoing and iterative manner throughout much of the assessment process. The collection of desktop information began in February 2013; new information sources were considered, as they were identified and became available, until October 10, 2013. 3.6 Primary Data Collection/Interviews Primary data sources included inputs and opinions from key informed sources at the community, regional and provincial level in BC. The study team conducted select technical meetings and discussions with the following key informed sources: • provincial and federal government officials; 7894/December 2013 REP-NEB-TERA-00030 Page 3-10 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Volume 8B, Marine Transportation Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Marine Commercial, Recreational and Tourism Use Technical Report • community-based non-governmental organizations with interests and knowledge in particular marine use issues (e.g., fisheries organizations, recreational use organizations); • results of Aboriginal engagement activities and non-traditional marine resource use information from potentially affected Aboriginal communities; and • discussions with key informed sources were important in the baseline data collection process in that they allowed the study team to: − verify and interpret information from existing literature and other desktop sources; − obtain qualitative information about marine use patterns and existing interfaces with marine vessel traffic; and − identify and access additional information sources. The MCRTU technical discussions were also essential in the issue-scoping process. They facilitated the identification and framing of key interests and issues related to the anticipated increased Project-related marine vessel traffic, as well as facilitated input regarding mitigation, enhancement and monitoring measures. Further sources of primary data included: • results of consultation conducted by other ESA disciplines; • GIS tools to determine spatial relationships of source data to marine shipping activities; • results of open houses and community gatherings; and • professional observations during field visits. All key informant discussions conducted are noted in the references list in Section 7.0 if this report and are listed in Table 2.1-1. All primary information collection was documented via Project-wide stakeholder engagement tracking protocols, as described in Volume 3 and summarized in Section 3.0 of Volume 8A. 3.7 Data Context and Limitations The level of information presented differs between each of the indicators. The level of detail presented is only that which is required to support a robust assessment of Project interactions with marine users in the RSA. Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fisheries Data For commercial fishing, spatial fisheries data are used to express the level of fishing activity across the study area. Publicly available data are provided by DFO in 4 km x 4 km grid cells, with the exception of data on salmon fisheries. The data for salmon fisheries are provided by Pacific Fisheries Management Area (PFMA) and sub-area, which are geographical divisions used by DFO to facilitate fisheries management (Figure 3.7.1). PFMAs and sub-areas shown in Figure 3.7.1 are referenced throughout Section 4.2 in descriptions of locations of fishing activities in the Marine RSA. DFO applies a “three-party rule” to the release of fisheries data. The rule states that in the case of three or fewer vessels reporting fishing activity from the same sub-area or grid cell, the information for that area will not be released. The rule is used for reasons of confidentiality, per the Access to Information Act 20(1) (b, c), which specifies that information that is supplied in confidence to a government institution by a third party must be treated confidentially in order to protect the interests of the party. With respect to commercial fishing, the application of the Act ensures that certain data attributes are suppressed so as not to disclose the precise locations of fishing vessels (BC Marine Conservation Analysis [BCMCA] 2011a). 7894/December 2013 REP-NEB-TERA-00030 Page 3-11 Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC Volume 8B, Marine Transportation Technical Reports Trans Mountain Expansion Project Marine Commercial, Recreational and Tourism Use Technical Report A further limitation of the fisheries data is that the precise location of fishing is not known even when activity is reported for a particular area. For example, actual fishing activity could be concentrated in one or two small areas within a particular grid cell, or along a depth contour in a PFMA sub-area. Effort data for the Marine RSA are extracted from the BC coast-wide dataset and classified into several effort categories, based on the level of effort within the Marine RSA (i.e., the effort categories are based on effort only within the fishing management areas in the region traversed by the Marine RSA and not on the coast-wide dataset). Fishing activity is reported for each fishery as fishing effort, which refers to the total amount of time the vessel is actively fishing within a particular grid cell. Effort is shown variously as the aggregated number of boat days (e.g., for salmon) or soak time (for invertebrate fisheries) over the specified period. Effort is used as a measure rather than catch, since it more accurately depicts where fishing activity tends to be concentrated. The effort data are then aggregated over consecutive years. The datasets used for this technical report vary in the number of years of data available and the way the data are aggregated. For example, shrimp trawl fisheries (beam and otter trawl) data are provided separately by DFO for gear type and species from 2000 to 2009, but for the purposes of this technical report the fishing effort data for all shrimp species over the years provided are combined for each trawl type. For salmon, datasets are available for individual years and gear types, but have been combined from each available year to show aggregated effort for each gear type (seine, gillnet and troll) from 2002 to 2007. The remaining datasets are provided by DFO as cumulative fishing effort data for a specific time period. Other Data Sources Spatial information on marine transportation, recreational use, and tourism use of the Marine RSA are described using results of a marine vessel traffic analysis (see the TMEP TERMPOL 3.2 of Volume 8C), desktop review, discussion with stakeholders, and analysis of publicly available coastal datasets. 7894/December 2013 REP-NEB-TERA-00030 Page 3-12 125°0'0"W 124°0'0"W 123°0'0"W 28-5 28-4 N " FIGURE 3.7-1 0 ' 28-3 0 3 ° N " 9 0 4 ' 0 PACIFIC FISHERY SHEET OF 6 3 ¯ ° 9 MANAGEMENT AREAS (PFMAS) SECHELT PFMA 28 4 28-14 AND SUB-AREAS 29-1 28-2 28-13 DISTRICT GIBSONS TRANS MOUNTAIN 28-1 WEST OF NORT H Coquitlam Pitt 17-11 VANCOUV ER VANCOUV ER Lake Lake EXPANSION PROJECT QUALICUM BOWEN 28-12 reat Cen G tr 19 BEACH ISLAND al L OP ANMORE ake PARKSVILLE PFMA 17 29-2 28-6 CITY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gary's Charts
    Gary’s Garage Sale - Chart List Chart Number Chart Name Area Scale Condition Price 3410 Sooke Inlet West Coast Vancouver Island 1:20 000 Good $ 10.00 3415 Victoria Harbour East Coast Vancouver Island 1:6 000 Poor Free 3441 Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and Sattelite Channel East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 2.50 3441 Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and Sattelite Channel East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3441 Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and Sattelite Channel East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Poor Free 3442 North Pender Island to Thetis Island East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 2.50 3442 North Pender Island to Thetis Island East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3443 Thetis Island to Nanaimo East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3459 Nanoose Harbour East Vancouver Island 1:15 000 Fair $ 5.00 3463 Strait of Georgia East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 7.50 3537 Okisollo Channel East Coast Vancouver Island 1:20 000 Good $ 10.00 3537 Okisollo Channel East Coast Vancouver Island 1:20 000 Fair $ 5.00 3538 Desolation Sound & Sutil Channel East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair/Poor $ 2.50 3539 Discovery Passage East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Poor Free 3541 Approaches to Toba Inlet East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3545 Johnstone Strait - Port Neville to Robson Bight East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Good $ 10.00 3546 Broughton Strait East Coast Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Fair $ 5.00 3549 Queen Charlotte Strait East Vancouver Island 1:40 000 Excellent $ 15.00 3549 Queen Charlotte Strait East
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Distribution of Marine Birds and Mammals in the Southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia
    Status and Distribution of Marine Birds and Mammals in the Southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia. Pete Davidson∗, Robert W Butler∗+, Andrew Couturier∗, Sandra Marquez∗ & Denis LePage∗ Final report to Parks Canada by ∗Bird Studies Canada and the +Pacific WildLife Foundation December 2010 Recommended citation: Davidson, P., R.W. Butler, A. Couturier, S. Marquez and D. Lepage. 2010. Status and Distribution of Birds and Mammals in the Southern Gulf Islands, British Columbia. Bird Studies Canada & Pacific Wildlife Foundation unpublished report to Parks Canada. The data from this survey are publicly available for download at www.naturecounts.ca Bird Studies Canada British Columbia Program, Pacific Wildlife Research Centre, 5421 Robertson Road, Delta British Columbia, V4K 3N2. Canada. www.birdscanada.org Pacific Wildlife Foundation, Reed Point Marine Education Centre, Reed Point Marina, 850 Barnet Highway, Port Moody, British Columbia, V3H 1V6. Canada. www.pwlf.org Contents Executive Summary…………………..……………………………………………………………………………………………1 1. Introduction 1.1 Background and Context……………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 1.2 Previous Studies…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 2. Study Area and Methods 2.1 Study Area……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 2.2 Transect route……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 2.3 Kernel and Cluster Mapping Techniques……………………………………………………………………………..7 2.3.1 Kernel Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 2.3.2 Clustering Analysis………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Appendix B: System Description
    TECHNICAL APPENDIX B: SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Assessment of Oil Spill Risk due to Potential Increased Vessel Traffic at Cherry Point, Washington Submitted by VTRA TEAM: Johan Rene van Dorp (GWU), John R. Harrald (GWU), Jason R.. W. Merrick (VCU) and Martha Grabowski (RPI) August 31, 2008 Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment (VTRA) - Final Report 08/31/08 TABLE OF CONTENTS B-1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................4 B-2. Waters of the Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment...................................................................4 B-2.1. Juan de Fuca-West:........................................................................................................4 B-2.2. Juan de Fuca-East:.........................................................................................................5 B-2.3. Puget Sound ...................................................................................................................5 B-2.4. Haro Strait-Boundary Pass...........................................................................................6 B-2.5. Rosario Strait..................................................................................................................6 B-2.6. Cherry Point...................................................................................................................6 B-2.7. SaddleBag........................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Regional Guide Cat
    National Marine Weather Guide British Columbia Regional Guide Cat. No. En56-240/3-2015E-PDF 978-1-100-25953-6 Terms of Usage Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; • Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) or 819-997-2800 or email to [email protected]. Disclaimer: Her Majesty is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in the reproduced material. Her Majesty shall at all times be indemnified and held harmless against any and all claims whatsoever arising out of negligence or other fault in the use of the information contained in this publication or product. Photo credits Cover Left: Chris Gibbons Cover Center: Chris Gibbons Cover Right: Ed Goski Page I: Ed Goski Page II: top left - Chris Gibbons, top right - Matt MacDonald, bottom - André Besson Page VI: Chris Gibbons Page 1: Chris Gibbons Page 5: Lisa West Page 8: Matt MacDonald Page 13: André Besson Page 15: Chris Gibbons Page 42: Lisa West Page 49: Chris Gibbons Page 119: Lisa West Page 138: Matt MacDonald Page 142: Matt MacDonald Acknowledgments Without the works of Owen Lange, this chapter would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Basis for the Living Dike Concept Prepared by SNC-Lavalin Inc
    West Coast Environmental Law Design Basis for the Living Dike Concept Prepared by SNC-Lavalin Inc. 31 July 2018 Document No.: 644868-1000-41EB-0001 Revision: 1 West Coast Environmental Law Design Basis for the Living Dike Concept West Coast Environmental Law Research Foundation and West Coast Environmental Law Association gratefully acknowledge the support of the funders who have made this work possible: © SNC-Lavalin Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. i West Coast Environmental Law Design Basis for the Living Dike Concept EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background West Coast Environmental Law (WCEL) is leading an initiative to explore the implementation of a coastal flood protection system that also protects and enhances existing and future coastal and aquatic ecosystems. The purpose of this document is to summarize available experience and provide an initial technical basis to define how this objective might be realized. This “Living Dike” concept is intended as a best practice measure to meet this balanced objective in response to rising sea levels in a changing climate. It is well known that coastal wetlands and marshes provide considerable protection against storm surge and related wave effects when hurricanes or severe storms come ashore. Studies have also shown that salt marshes in front of coastal sea dikes can reduce the nearshore wave heights by as much as 40 percent. This reduction of the sea state in front of a dike reduces the required crest elevation and volumes of material in the dike, potentially lowering the total cost of a suitable dike by approximately 30 percent. In most cases, existing investigations and studies consider the relative merits of wetlands and marshes for a more or less static sea level, which may include an allowance for future sea level rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Salish Sea Ambient Noise Study: Best Practices (2021)
    Salish Sea Ambient Noise Study: Best Practices (2021) This work was sponsored and financially supported by the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority. Transport Canada provided additional financial support. For bibliographic purposes, this document should be cited as follows: Eickmeier, J., Tollit, D., Trounce, K., Warner, G., Wood, J., MacGillivray, A. and Zizheng Li (2021) Salish Sea Ambient Noise Study: Best Practices (2021). Vancouver, British Columbia, Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation (ECHO) Program. Authors: Justin Eickmeier1, Dominic Tollit2, Krista Trounce3, Graham Warner4, Jason Wood5, Alex MacGillivray6 and Zizheng Li7 1) Justin M. Eickmeier is a Consulting Scientist at SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6J 1V4 ([email protected]) 2) Dominic J. Tollit is the Principal Scientist at SMRU Consulting North America, Vancouver, British Colunbia, V6B 1A1 ([email protected]) 3) Krista B. Trounce is the Research Manager for the ECHO Program, Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3T4 ([email protected]) 4) Graham Warner is a Project Scientist for JASCO Applied Sciences (Canada) Ltd. 5) Jason Wood is Operations Manager & Senior Research Scientist at SMRU Consulting North America 6) Alex MacGillivray is a Senior Scientist for JASCO JASCO Applied Sciences (Canada) Ltd. 7) Zizheng Li is a Project Scientist for JASCO JASCO Applied Sciences (Canada) Ltd. Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ECHO Program Salish Sea Ambient Noise Evaluation
    Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Salish Sea Ambient Noise Evaluation 2016–2017 ECHO Program Study Summary This study was undertaken for Vancouver Fraser Port Authority’s Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation (ECHO) Program to analyze regional acoustic data collected over two years (2016–2017) at three sites in the Salish Sea: Haro Strait, Boundary Pass and the Strait of Georgia. These sites were selected by the ECHO Program to be representative of three sub-areas of interest in the region in important habitat for marine mammals, including southern resident killer whales (SRKW). This summary document describes how and why the project was conducted, its key findings and conclusions. What questions was the study trying to answer? The ambient noise evaluation study investigated the following questions: What were the variabilities and/or trends in ambient noise over time and for each site, and did these hold true for all three sites? What key factors affected ambient noise differences and variability at each site? What are the key requirements for future monitoring of ambient noise to better understand the contribution of commercial vessel traffic to ambient noise levels, and how ambient noise may be monitored in the future? Who conducted the project? JASCO Applied Sciences (Canada) Ltd., SMRU Consulting North America, and the Coastal & Ocean Resource Analysis Laboratory (CORAL) of University of Victoria were collaboratively retained by the port authority to conduct the study. All three organizations were involved in data collection and analysis at one or more of the three study sites over the two-year time frame of acoustic data collection.
    [Show full text]
  • PART 3 Scale 1: Publication Edition 46 W Puget Sound – Point Partridge to Point No Point 50,000 Aug
    Natural Date of New Chart No. Title of Chart or Plan PART 3 Scale 1: Publication Edition 46 w Puget Sound – Point Partridge to Point No Point 50,000 Aug. 1995 July 2005 Port Townsend 25,000 47 w Puget Sound – Point No Point to Alki Point 50,000 Mar. 1996 Sept. 2003 Everett 12,500 48 w Puget Sound – Alki Point to Point Defi ance 50,000 Dec. 1995 Aug. 2011 A Tacoma 15,000 B Continuation of A 15,000 50 w Puget Sound – Seattle Harbor 10,000 Mar. 1995 June 2001 Q1 Continuation of Duwamish Waterway 10,000 51 w Puget Sound – Point Defi ance to Olympia 80,000 Mar. 1998 - A Budd Inlet 20,000 B Olympia (continuation of A) 20,000 80 w Rosario Strait 50,000 Mar. 1995 June 2011 1717w Ports in Juan de Fuca Strait - July 1993 July 2007 Neah Bay 10,000 Port Angeles 10,000 1947w Admiralty Inlet and Puget Sound 139,000 Oct. 1893 Sept. 2003 2531w Cape Mendocino to Vancouver Island 1,020,000 Apr. 1884 June 1978 2940w Cape Disappointment to Cape Flattery 200,000 Apr. 1948 Feb. 2003 3125w Grays Harbor 40,000 July 1949 Aug. 1998 A Continuation of Chehalis River 40,000 4920w Juan de Fuca Strait to / à Dixon Entrance 1,250,000 Mar. 2005 - 4921w Queen Charlotte Sound to / à Dixon Entrance 525,000 Oct. 2008 - 4922w Vancouver Island / Île de Vancouver-Juan de Fuca Strait to / à Queen 525,000 Mar. 2005 - Charlotte Sound 4923w Queen Charlotte Sound 365,100 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Southern Strait of Georgia NMCA Atlas
    OCEANOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 2 DIVERSITY body of water sheltered from Snapshots of oceanographic the wind, with little current processes in the southern and relatively low levels of Strait of Georgia reveal a fresh water input, level of diversity that is is an area of exceptionally uncommon for such a small high stratification. If the geographic area. Due in part waters could be removed to the freshwater discharge and looked at in profile, from the Fraser River, the there would be clearly upwelling from Haro Strait, defined layers each with and the varied seabed below, different characteristics. there is a wide range of In contrast, because of the temperatures, salinity levels, large volume of water that currents and stratification. must squeeze through a tiny, twisting channel, Active Pass EXTREMES has waters that are so highly The southern Strait of mixed and churned that the Georgia is more than diverse; phenomenon is visible from it is a zone of extremes. For ferry decks above! instance, Saanich Inlet, a deep INTERESTING The water in the Strait of Georgia is not much colder than the waters of northern California. INFO Surface waters move much faster than deeper waters. To travel from the southern Strait of Georgia to the Juan de Fuca Strait, a log at the surface takes only 24 hours; a waterlogged piece of wood 50 metres below takes a full year! The Fraser River accounts for roughly 80% of the freshwater entering the Strait of Georgia. 11 • PROPOSED SOUTHERN STRAIT OF GEORGIA NATIONAL MARINE CONSERVATION AREA RESERVE ATLAS – CHAPTER 2 • Supplemental Information Article References • Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 150630 SJC Oil Spill Evaluation FINAL Narrative Only
    OIL SPILL RESPONSE Capacity Evaluation June 30, 2015 By: Nuka Research & Planning Group, LLC San Juan County Oil Spill Response Capacity Evaluation SAN JUAN COUNTY Oil Spill Response Capacity Evaluation June 30, 2015 Produced for: San Juan County Produced by: Nuka Research & Planning Group, LLC. Version: June 30, 2015 2 San Juan County Oil Spill Response Capacity Evaluation Executive Summary and Key Findings The San Juan Islands form an archipelago in northwestern Washington, with Haro Strait and Boundary Pass to the west, and Rosario Strait to the east. This area experiences strong currents and tidal rips, occasional strong winds, and heavy fog. The islands are positioned between major shipping routes traveled by vessels calling at ports in both Washington and British Columbia. Large vessel traffic along these routes is expected to increase significantly due to proposed port expansion projects in both the U.S. and Canada, with the increase in ship traffic and associated potential for large oil spills highest on the western side of the islands in Haro Strait and Boundary Pass. San Juan County is concerned about both current oil spill risks and the potential for increased risk as more ships pass the Islands. The County contracted Nuka Research and Planning Group, LLC (Nuka Research) to analyze the potential capacity of current oil spill response forces to respond to a marine oil spill in its adjacent waters. The Puget Sound Partnership provided the County with funding for this project to implement Puget Sound Action Agenda Near Term Action, C8.3 “Evaluate Oil Spill Response Capability in the San Juans.” This study assessed some of the most important aspects of oil spill response in Haro Strait/Boundary Pass and Rosario Strait by considering the impact of different factors on maximum potential on-water oil recovery capacity across a series of modeled scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    108th Congress of the United States C A N A D A CANADA Blaine Nooksack Trust Land Sumas Semiahmoo Bay 9 e Drayton t R Harbor t StRte 546 (Badger Rd) S Lynden Birch Bay Peaceful N o o Valley ks ac Nooksack Trust Land k R iv er Birch Bay Nooksack StRte 548 (Blaine Rd) Custer Everson Kendall Maple Falls StRte 548 (Grandview Rd) StRte 544 (Pole Rd) StRte 9 Strait of Georgia Glacier Nooksack Lake Terrell Trust Land Nooksack Trust Land ) y w Ferndale 2 H 4 r 5 e e k t a R t B Deming t S North Cascades Natl Pk n WHATCOM u o Ross (M Lake Nooksack Res StRte 542 Nooksack Trust Marietta- Land Alderwood OKANOGAN 5 Nooksack Trust Land Echo Bay Lummi Bellingham Res Boundary Pass President Channel Geneva Baker Lake Hales Passage StRte 9 (Valley Hwy) Sudden Hwy) es Bellingham cad Valley Acme as Bay 20 (C Ross Lake Natl Rec Area te R S t Cowlitz Bay Lake DISTRICT Chuckanut Whatcom Bay 5 New Channel Lake Samish S t West H w Alger y 1 Sound 1 Haro Strait ( C h East u S c tH k w Sound a y n Samish Bay u 2 Harney t 0 D Channel B ( San Juan Channel r) S e Lake Shannon t l R l i d n Samish TDSA 2 g 0 h ) Rosario Strait SAN JUAN a r m e Upright Upper v Rosario Strait i Channel C Skagit R h Edison a Res it Friday Lopez Sound n g nel a k Harbor S Friday Upper Skagit Res Hamilton Concrete North Cascades Natl Pk Lyman Harbor Guemes Channel StHwy 20 Ska Marblemount Sedro-Woolley git R iver Fidalgo Griffin Bay Bay Anacortes SKAGIT Rockport Padilla Bay View Bay Burrows Burlington Bay 0 StHwy 2 StH Clear Lake P w y Similk u (Memoria 5 StHwy 538 g l 36 Bay e H w t (College
    [Show full text]
  • Index to NGA Charts, Region 1
    1 2 REGION 1 COASTAL CHARTS Stock Number Title Scale =1: 11004 Mississippi River to Rio Grande 866,500 14003 Cape Race to Cape Henry 1,532,210 14018 The Grand Banks of Newfoundland and the Adjacent Coast 1,200,000 14024 Island of Newfoundland 720,240 15017 Hudson Strait (OMEGA) 1,000,000 15018 Belle Isle to Resolution Island (OMEGA) 1,000,000 15020 Hudson Strait to Greenland 1,501,493 15023 Queen Elizabeth Islands - Southern Part and Adjacent Waters 1,000,000 16220 St. Lawrence Island to Bering Strait 315,350 17003 Strait of Juan de Fuca to Dixon Entrance 1,250,000 18000 Point Conception to Isla Cedros 950,000 19008 Hawaiian Islands (OMEGA-BATHYMETRIC CHART) 1,030,000 38029 Baffin Bay (OMEGA) 917,000 38032 Godthabsfjord to Qeqertarsuaq including Cumberland Peninsula 841,000 38280 Kennedy Channel-Kane Basin to Hall Basin 300,000 38300 Smith Sound and Kane Basin 300,000 38320 Inglefield Bredning &Approaches 300,000 96028 Poluostrov Kamchatka to Aleutian Islands including Komandorskiye Ostrova 1,329,300 96036 Bering Strait (OMEGA) 928,770 3 4 REGION 1 COASTAL CHARTS EAST AND WEST COASTS-UNITED STATES Stock Number Title Scale =1: 11461 Straits of Florida-Southern Portion 300,000 13264 Approaches to Bay of Fundy 300,000 17005 Vancouver Island 525,000 17008 Queen Charlotte Sound to Dixon Entrance 525,000 17480 Queen Charlotte Sound 365,100 18766 San Diego to Islas De Todos Santos (LORAN-C) 180,000 5 6 NOVA SCOTIA AREA Stock Number Title Scale =1: Stock Number Title Scale =1: 14061 Grand Manan (Bay of Fundy) 60,000 14136 Sydney Harbour 20,000 14081 Medway Harbour to Lockeport Harbour including Liverpool 80,000 Plans: A.
    [Show full text]