DOCSLIB.ORG

Course Description

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Course Description Political Science 6716 Scope and Epistemology Fall 2017 ASSIGNMENT 1: READ THIS CAREFULLY!! Instructor: Dr. Laura Sjoberg Contact: (email) [email protected] (phone) 352.575.8603 (skype): laurasjoberg Office: 203 Anderson (hours):: 3pm-6pm Tuesday & appointment Class Time: 1145am-245pm Tuesday Class Location: Political Science Conference Room COURSE DESCRIPTION This course surveys the big questions of epistemology in the study of politics, and the ways that those questions of epistemology impact the organization (sociology) of the discipline as well as its power structure (politics). It does so attempting to represent all of political science’s subdivisions (both the traditional American politics, comparative politics, International Relations, and theory subdivision and other divides like those between science and humanities, quantitative and qualitative, policy-relevant and not). You will note that, to many of these questions, there does not feel like there is a “right” answer – that is, both sides make compelling arguments, when in a vacuum and even when compared. W. B. Gallie suggested that there is a such thing as an “essentially contested concept” – one to which there is no easily reducible answer or description – instead, it is by nature always and everywhere subject to debate. I suggest that the notion of political science is an essentially contested concept – that there is no knowing what ‘it’ is, but instead just knowing the debates around what ‘it’ is. Yet we still must do (or perform) political science – so navigating the contestation is practically imperative. The practical part is why we start at, and focus on, epistemology (how we can know). If political science is (at least by large consensus) an enterprise in which knowledge is produced, then it is important to know what qualifies as knowledge and how one would produce it in order to become a producer of it. Most professors would tell you that, after surveying the available options and understanding the disciplinary contours, it is up to you to make a choice about ‘your’ epistemology. I take two issues with that. First, I think that ‘your’ epistemology (how you believe one can know) is deeply personal, and need not either be shared or translated into your work if you do not want it to be. The choice is what epistemological approach (or approaches) you use in your scholarly work, and how you justify those choices. Second, I believe those choices are not (and cannot be) independent of what you hope to accomplish with your research work – practical choices about navigating the enterprise of political science. I suggest these not only do but should weigh on your epistemological choices. As elsewhere in political science, it is important to have a deep understanding of even those perspectives to which you are diametrically opposed. In this spirit, this course asks you to work as hard to understand the approaches which make no sense to you as those that do. Accordingly, it presents each approach with a similar level of both gravity and depth, looking for not only respectful engagement but understanding. 1 GRADING The grade will be divided into five parts: 1) Contribution (20%) 2) Short Papers (30%) 3) Reading Reactions (10%) 4) CV and Website (10%) 5) Elements of Practical Participation (10%) 6) Final Exam (20%) The Grade Scale is: 94-100: A; 90-93: A-; 87-89: B+; 83-86: B; 80-82: B-; 77-79: C+; 73-76: C; 70- 72: C-; 67-69: D+; 63-67: D; 60-62: D- The University of Florida assigns the following grade points: A: 4.0, A-: 3.67, B+: 3.33, B: 3, B-: 2.67, C+: 2.33, C: 2.0; C-: 1.67, D+: 1.33, D: 1, D-: .67, E: 0, WF: 0, I: 0; NG: 0. CONTRIBUTION You are expected to attend all class meetings, and to be prepared to discuss the readings in depth. Please note that a portion of your final grade relies on your participation and attendance. By “contribution,” I do not mean being the person who is most willing to talk in front of the class. Contribution grades are based on the quality of participation – students who offer engaging and critical perspectives on course readings which reflect that they have read them. Attendance will be checked, and preparedness will be expected. If for some reason you will be unprepared for class on a given day, be sure to email me beforehand. Sharing your thoughts aloud is a requirement as most things that one can do with a Political Science Ph.D. require some amount of speaking in front of people. Still, if you have a question or something to share that you prefer not to ask or share in front of the class, it is fine to email me about it. SHORT PAPERS You will be asked to do three short papers over the course of the semester. Each will constitute 10 percent of your grade. 9/12/2017. Short paper #1 due. Write 2500-4000 words about what you know about politics, how you came to know what you know, and how you know you know it. Make sure to document the warrants to your arguments, what (if anything) you see as ‘evidence,’ how you would confront claims to that you do not know what you claim to know or that you are wrong, and what degree of certainty you would give your knowledge. Paper due by midnight Eastern Daylight Time. 10/10/2017. Short paper #2 due. Write 2500-4000 words about how you intend to contribute to knowledge in Political Science in graduate school and beyond. Start with a brief explanation 2 (like you would describe in just a minute or two to a senior scholar), and then expand. Include your proposed research agenda, what will make it count as knowledge, how you will demonstrate that it does add knowledge, and how you will counter criticisms that it does not add knowledge. Paper is due by 3pm Eastern Daylight Time. 11/7/2017. Short Paper #3 Due. Mock up the epistemology and methods section of a dissertation prospectus. It can be your planned dissertation, or a random pretend dissertation. Make sure that your methods section states the philosophical and epistemological wagers that you plan to make, and how you plan to translate those into knowledge about your proposed research subject. If you do not know the specifics about some technique (e.g., narrative analysis, statistics, formal modelling), be as descriptive as possible about what you want to get out of the use of the methods you use in terms of the production of knowledge. Make your methods section between 1000 and 1500 words. Due by 1145am Eastern Standard Time. READING REACTIONS You will be asked to write two two-page reading reaction papers on topics of your choice over the course of the weeks 2,3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11. These reaction papers will be a place for you to, after briefly demonstrating an understanding of the reading, let me know what you think about it and pose either questions you would like answered or questions you think would be good for the discussion in the class. If you are going to do a reading reaction for any given week, it is due via email on the Monday preceding the Tuesday class. Please do not choose weeks 10 and 11 because you do not feel like doing it before that. Please choose weeks in which you have a genuine interest in the topic and/or the reading speaks to you. CV AND WEBSITE So, you want to be a political scientist? You shall have a CV and a website. We’re going to work on them in this class. There are two due dates – the first draft of your CV and the second draft of your CV/first draft of your website. First Draft of CV: by 6pm Eastern Daylight Time, 10/10/2017. Second Draft of CV and First Draft of Website: by 1145am Eastern Standard Time, 11/21/2017. ELEMENTS OF PRACTICAL PARTICIPATION In Week 15 (11/28/2017), you will be asked to write two possible conference abstracts before class. These will constitute 5% of your grade. In Week 16 (12/5/2017), you will be asked to provide a brief plan for your first publishable idea. This will constitute 5% of your grade as well. 3 FINAL EXAMINATION The final examination is essay-based, and take-home. It will be distributed in class on December 5, and due one week later. It will consist of one essay question as practice for your future comprehensive examinations.. The answer should be between 2000 and 2500 words long. We will talk at length about what that means. This is sort of outdated, but still gives a good overview: http://polisci.ufl.edu/international-relations-exam-guide/. YOU MAY, SHOULD YOU BE SO BOLD, FORGO DOING THE FINAL EXAM TO TURN IN A DRAFT OF A DISSERTATION PROSPECTUS. There is no penalty for doing the final, and no reward for the dissertation prospectus. It will be graded as if you are a first year, first semester PhD student. HONOR SYSTEM All students are expected to follow the Honor Code at the University of Florida. “We, the members of the University of Florida community, pledge to hold ourselves and our peers to the highest standards of honesty and integrity.” On all work submitted for credit by students at the University of Florida, the following pledge is either required or implied: “On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment.” Any student found violating the Honor Code will be reported.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CURRICULUM VITAE February 2016 [email protected]
    CURRICULUM VITAE February 2016 [email protected] Name: J. Ann Tickner Positions: Professor Emerita, School of International Relations, University of Southern California Distinguished Scholar in Residence, The American University, Washington, DC Professor, Politics and International Relations, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia 2014- Education: Ph.D. Brandeis University 1983, Political Science M.A. Yale University 1960, International Relations B.A. University of London 1959, History Awards and • 2016 Faculty Lifetime Achievement Award, University of Southern California Recognition: • Tickner Award, International Studies Association. Established in 2011 to recognize J. Ann Tickner for her pathbreaking role within the ISA and in the discipline of International Relations more generally. • J. Ann Tickner Book Prize. Established in 2012 by the School of International Relations, University of Southern California • Distinguished Scholar-in-Residence, American University, 2011- • J. Ann Tickner Prize for the Best Masters Dissertation in International Relations, Queen Mary College University of London (established 2010) • Visiting Distinguished Professor, University of Auckland (in residence July 2010) • 2009 Remarkable Woman Award, University of Southern California • Gamma Sigma Alpha Professor of the Year 2009, University of Southern California • Susan S. Northcutt Award, Women’s Caucus for International Studies, International Studies Association, 2007 • Ranked #19 of scholars having the greatest impact on the International Relations discipline over the past 20 years, TRIP Survey 2011 • President, International Studies Association 2006-2007 • Award for Excellence in Graduate Education, SIRGA, USC, 2005 • Honorary Ph.D. University of Uppsala, 1999 • Honorary Professor, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, UK • Named as one of Fifty Key Thinkers in Martin Griffiths, Fifty Key Thinkers in International Relations, Routledge, 1999, 2nd edition 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    University of Alberta Disciplining Development: Sex, Power and the (Re)Construction of Women in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone by Megan Hazel MacKenzie CO) A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science Edmonton, Alberta Fall 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-46374-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-46374-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Laura Sjoberg
    Laura Sjoberg University of Florida [email protected] Department of Political Science 352.575.8603 PO Box 117325 Anderson Hall www.laurasjoberG.com Gainesville, Florida 32611-7325 Education J.D. (Cum Laude), Boston ColleGe Law School Ph.D. (with Distinction), University of Southern California School of International Relations B.A. (with HiGh Honors) University of ChicaGo, in Political Science and History Academic Appointments 2012- Associate Professor, Political Science, University of Florida 2009-2012 Assistant Professor, Political Science, University of Florida 2008-2011 Faculty Research Affiliate, Women and Public Policy ProGram, Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government 2007-2009 Assistant Professor, Political Science, VirGinia Tech 2007 VisitinG Scholar, Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of MichiGan 2006-2007 VisitinG Assistant Professor, Political Science, Duke University 2005-2006 Post-Doctoral Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Women and Public Policy Program, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 2006 VisitinG Assistant Professor, Women’s Studies, Merrimack ColleGe 2005 Lecturer, Politics and Women’s Studies, Brandeis University Special Training • Basin Harbor Workshop on Teaching Security Studies, Johns Hopkins University, 2009 • Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, University of MichiGan, 2008 • Journeys in World Politics, University of Iowa, 2007 • Executive Education: From Harvard Square to the Oval Office: Women in Politics, 2005-2006
    [Show full text]
  • Dustin Ells Howes Department of Political Science Louisiana State University 219 Stubbs Hall Baton Rouge, LA 70803 W 225-578-2619 [email protected]
    Dustin Ells Howes Department of Political Science Louisiana State University 219 Stubbs Hall Baton Rouge, LA 70803 W 225-578-2619 [email protected] POSITIONS HELD David J. Kriskovich Distinguished Professor of Political Science. Fall 2014 –– present. Associate Professor, Louisiana State University. Fall 2013 –– present. Assistant Professor, Louisiana State University. Fall 2008 –– Spring 2013. Assistant Professor, St. Mary’s College of Maryland. Fall 2006 –– Spring 2008. Visiting Assistant Professor, State University of New York, Oswego, New York. Fall 2005 – Spring 2006. EDUCATION University of North Carolina; Chapel Hill, North Carolina — Ph. D. in Political Science 2005 University of Chicago; Chicago, Illinois — A.M. in Social Sciences 1996 University of Michigan; Ann Arbor, Michigan — A.B. in Political Science and Communications 1995 BOOKS Freedom Without Violence: Resisting the Western Political Tradition. Under contract with Oxford University Press. Toward A Credible Pacifism: Violence and the Possibilities of Politics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2009. ARTICLES “The Just War Masquerade.” The Peace Review. Forthcoming. “The Failure of Pacifism and the Success of Nonviolence.” Perspectives on Politics. June 2013. Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 427-446. “Creating Necessity: Well-used Violence in the Thought of Machiavelli.” For a double issue of symplokē on violence, 2012, Vol. 20, Nos. 1-2, pp. 145-169. “Torture Is Not a Game: On the Limitations and Dangers of Rational Choice Methods.” Political Research Quarterly. March 2012. Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 20-27. 1 “Terror In and Out of Power.” European Journal of Political Theory. January 2012. Vol. 11, No. 1: 25-58. “Conservative Democratic Thought and the War on Terror.” Review essay in Human Rights Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and War
    Fall 2018 Professor Lisa Baldez 3A 114 Silsby; 646-2655 Dartmouth College [email protected] Berry 370 Ofc hrs: Tues 3-5pm and by appt. Govt 85.38 Gender and War Course Description Historically, the connection between gender and war was considered to be so obvious that few thought to question it. Men make up the vast majority of political decision makers who prosecute wars, and men constitute the vast majority of soldiers who fight wars. In the last few decades, scholars have asked why this is the case and challenged assumptions about how conceptions of masculinity and femininity matter in global conflict. In January 2018, political scientist Carol Cohn wrote an op-ed in the New York Times in which she maintained that “ideas about masculinity and femininity matter in international politics, in national security and in nuclear strategic thinking.” In this seminar, we will delve into the research that explains how gender shapes war, and why it does. We will read some of the classic studies in this field and the most influential research on gender and war in political science in order to understand the ways in which conceptions of gender difference shape the causes and consequences of war. (Western cultures, INT and SOC) Learning Goals By the end of this course, you will be able to • Describe the facts and concepts and arguments made in the assigned readings, verbally and in written form. • Explain, and then critique, the arguments made in the assigned readings, verbally and in written form. • Synthesize the material assigned in class to answer the following questions: o How do scholars define gender and how is it relevant to various aspects of foreign policy and international politics? o What are the gendered causes and consequences of war? o How do scholars define gender and which conceptions do you find most persuasive? • Reflect on the assigned material in order to link it to what you already know and to generate your own perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in International Relations Daniel Maliniak, University of California San Diego Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, Michael J
    122 Politics & Gender 4(1) 2008 Women in International Relations Daniel Maliniak, University of California San Diego Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, Michael J. Tierney, College of William and Mary DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X08000068 Women now receive political science degrees in record numbers, but female representation among political science faculty still lags behind that of many other disciplines. Only 26% of the 13,000 political science professors in the United States today are women (Sedowski and Brintall 2007). According to our recent survey of international relations faculty in the United States — the 2006 Teaching, Research, and International Politics (TRIP) Survey — women comprise an even smaller proportion of IR scholars: 77% of the IR faculty respondents are men, while only 23% are women.1 Even more than their counterparts in the wider field of political science, women in IR tend to be more junior and less likely to hold tenure than their male colleagues. Women comprise a minority at every level of the profession, but they are most scarce at the full professor level: Only 17% of political science professors and 14% of IR professors are women (Maliniak et al. 2007c; Sedowski and Brintall 2007). Women may be underrepresented in the profession and trail their male colleagues because they see the world differently; they may see the world differently because of their minority status within the discipline; or the causal arrow may run in both directions. Many feminist scholars contend that gender subordination explains significant differences in worldview between men and women. Other scholars suggest that the content of women’s scholarship contributes to their marginalization within the profession: Female political scientists adopt methods and choose topics that are not considered to be the best or most rigorous types of research by the editors of leading journals.2 As a result, “women’s publishing opportunities may be restricted, or ghettoized, to specific and gendered domains” (Mathews and Anderson 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation
    INFORMATION INTERVENTION AND THE NEED FOR A SOCIAL CYBERSECURITY PERSPECTIVE: THE POWER STRUGGLE BETWEEN DIGITAL DIPLOMACY AND COMPUTATIONAL PROPAGANDA By PHILLIP C. ARCENEAUX A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2019 © 2019 Phillip C. Arceneaux This dissertation is dedicated to my two grandfathers, Harry Arceneaux and Richard “Dick” Hanrahan, both of whom never had a college degree and sadly were never able to see me become Dr. Arceneaux. You were both loved so incredibly much and are missed every single day. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. David Ostroff, Dr. Spiro Kiousis, Dr. Jasmine McNealy, Dr. Laura Sjoberg, and Dr. Aida Hozic. As someone who is always interested in stressing interdisciplinary links and relationships in research, this dissertation is truly unique in its perspective, approach, and execution; this was only possible because of the incredible open-mindedness of each one of my committee members and the trust they had in me to go off and do some kind of justice to this research. They truly let me take this dissertation where I wanted to go rather than keeping me in the bumper lanes of what constitutes a “normal” dissertation in mass communication, and for that I am ever grateful. I would also like to thank all of my teachers and mentors in the University of Florida’s College of Journalism and Communication who helped and inspired me throughout my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Women in Terrorism
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2019 The Role of Women in Terrorism Zeynep Bayar The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3265 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE ROLE OF WOMEN IN TERRORISM by ZEYNEP BAYAR A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York. 2019 ii © 2019 ZEYNEP BAYAR All Rights Reserved iii The Role of Women in Terrorism by Zeynep Bayar This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. 4/20/2019 Date Peter Romaniuk Thesis Advisor 4/20/2019 Date Alyson Cole Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv ABSTRACT The Role of Women in Terrorism by Zeynep Bayar Advisor: Peter Romaniuk The main purpose of this paper is to understand what motivate women to join terrorist groups and why these organizations prefer to work with female terrorists. Although each woman has different reasons to involve in terrorist groups, this research demonstrates 'religious, political and personal' reasons as the major motivating factors. This study also focuses on the question of why women are the targets of terror recruiters.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives
    Gender and International Security This book explores the relationship between gender and international security, analyzing and critiquing international security theory and practice from a gendered perspective. Gender issues have an important place in the international security landscape, but have been neglected both in the theory and practice of international security. The passage and implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (on Security Council operations), the integration of gender concerns into peace- keeping, the management of refugees, post-conflict disarmament, and reinte- gration and protection for non-combatants in times of war show the increasing importance of gender sensitivity for actors on all fronts in global security. This book aims to improve the quality and quantity of conversations between feminist Security Studies and Security Studies more generally, in order to demonstrate the importance of gender analysis to the study of inter- national security, and to expand the feminist research program in Security Studies. The chapters included in this book not only challenge the assumed irrelevance of gender, they argue that gender is not a subsection of Security Studies to be compartmentalized or briefly considered as a side issue. Rather, the contributors argue that gender is conceptually, empirically, and norma- tively essential to studying international security. They do so by critiquing and reconstructing key concepts of and theories in international security, by looking for the increasingly complex roles women play as security actors, and by looking at various contemporary security issues through gendered lenses. Together, these chapters make the case that accurate, rigorous, and ethical scholarship of international security cannot be produced without taking account of women’s presence in or the gendering of world politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency, Militarized Femininity and Enemy Others: Observations from the War in Iraq
    International Feminist Journal of Politics ISSN: 1461-6742 (Print) 1468-4470 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rfjp20 Agency, Militarized Femininity and Enemy Others: Observations From The War In Iraq Laura Sjoberg To cite this article: Laura Sjoberg (2007) Agency, Militarized Femininity and Enemy Others: Observations From The War In Iraq, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 9:1, 82-101, DOI: 10.1080/14616740601066408 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616740601066408 Published online: 17 Apr 2007. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2349 View related articles Citing articles: 35 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rfjp20 Download by: [Harvard Library] Date: 14 July 2017, At: 13:53 Agency, Militarized Femininity and Enemy Others OBSERVATIONS FROM THE WAR IN IRAQ LAURA SJOBERG Duke University, USA Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In this era of the increasing importance of gender, many conflicting images of women populate news headlines and political discourses. In the 2003 war in Iraq, Americans saw images of a teenage woman as a war hero, of a female general in charge of a mili- tary prison where torture took place, of women who committed those abuses, of male victims of wartime sexual abuse and of the absence of gender in official government reactions to the torture at Abu Ghraib. I contend that several gendered stories from the 2003 war in Iraq demonstrate three major developments in militarized femininity in the United States: increasing sophistication of the ideal image of the woman soldier; stories of militarized femininity constructed in opposition to the gendered enemy; and evident tension between popular ideas of femininity and women’s agency in violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and International Relations Fall 2009
    Political Science 4931 Gender and International Relations Fall 2009 Instructor: Dr. Laura Sjoberg Email: [email protected] Office: 206 Anderson Office Hours: Tuesday 11:00-1:30 and by appointment Class Time: 1:55-2:45 (Tuesday), 1:55-3:50 (Thursday) Class Location: Anderson 101 (Tuesday), RNK 110 (Thursday) Phone: 617.875.6653 (do NOT call after midnight) COURSE DESCRIPTION Around the world, despite women’s progress, there continues to be a relatively rigid gender division of labor, between paid and unpaid work, according to economic sector, and along hierarchies. Though women do participate in the political process in most states, they are underrepresented in governments and their decision-making. Around the world, men dominate international security apparatuses and the making and fighting of wars. The global gender order makes possible the global political order. Despite the importance of gender in global politics, gender is still not fully integrated in the academic study of international politics. Feminist approaches are offering new views of a field previously defined as devoid of gender politics. Early IR feminists challenged the discipline to think about how its theories might be reformulated and how its understandings of global politics might be improved if gender were included as a category of analysis and if women’s experiences were part of its subject matter. IR feminists critically reexamined some of the key concepts in the field - concepts such as sovereignty, the state, and security. They began to ask new questions - such as whether it makes a difference that most foreign policy leaders, military personnel and heads of international corporations are men and why women remain relatively disempowered in matters of foreign and military policy.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the PDF File
    New Focus, New Lens: Ethical Contributions to Feminist Security Studies by Jillian A. Terry A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2011 A0 Te: Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-83103-8 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-83103-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]