DOCSLIB.ORG

Walter Rodney and That Hamilton Green Award- Errol Harry-London UK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Walter Rodney and That Hamilton Green Award- Errol Harry-London UK Post Script June 13 2015 Walter Rodney and that Hamilton Green Award- Errol Harry-London UK . That : 1. the murderous racist and desperate and now thankfully ancient ppp- ee Regime could dare to use Walter Rodney’s Assassination by the Burnham Dictatorship an established fact-as a 2015 Electioneering ploy to bash Assassin Forbes Burnham’s PNC and the APNU Coalition is outrageous but not surprising. 2.That pre-elections they could spend literally billions of Guyanese dollars on their political Commission of Inquiry on the Panel (& a Guyanese Journalist $6000 US a month!) speaks for itself. With all respect due to the Rodney Caribbean Commissioners this reeks of the kind of low-down bribery which we have become accustomed to associate with this putrid cabal. Freddie Kisson is quite correct : Professor Pat Rodney Walter’s widow should not have touched this lot with a barge pole ; it sullied Walter’s name and legacy in the process . 3.That the new Granger Govt would want to derail this politicised gravy train as soon as possible is also quite right -giving them one month to wrap it up. IF Only after their May 11 election victory ,they did not immediately take a decision to present one Hamilton The Hammer Green with the nations Highest Civilian Honour. 4..Green, Burnham’s cousin and currently Mayor of Georgetown was never a mere a bona fides ‘civilian’ Minister in the Burnham unelected Dictatorship but like ‘General’ Burnham himself was a civilian General who commanded his own private Death squad ‘Army’ of thugs. 5. This was yet another Praetorian Guard to supplement the other 5 official Army Forces -all in the service of a super militarised Neo- colonial state of which General Granger now President, was himself a part . 6..Walter Rodney and the WPA‘s aim to remove the Dictatorship was therefore cut out. This historical task must not be denied but viewed as a Patriotic Duty worthy of recognition in exactly the same terms as those who fought and died to remove the ppp-ee Regime today. 7..Crum-Ewing today was Walter Rodney and many others yesterday. It is they who should be honoured not Hamilton Green. Green is entitled to be rehabilitated but only after admitting and apologising to the Guyanese Nation before a Truth Commission. 8.. Recall that minutes before the explosion which took Walter Rodney’s last breath at 8pm on Friday 13 June 1980, this Hamilton Green was seen speeding down Brickdam opposite St Stanislaus College in the direction of Camp Street and Hadfield Streets where the bomb in the walkie-talkie trap set by Sgt.Gregory’s Smith and arranged by Burnham’s Chief of Intelligence Chief Godwin Mcpherson’s (now RIP from Berbice) was sprung. 9..Whether one cares about History or events of 13 June 1980 or not , this untimely ill-advised and outrageous Award to Green is the moral and political equivalent of the ppp awarding the imprisoned Raja Khan with Guyana’s highest award. 10..In prison in New York Khan is like Green was a ‘civilian’/ General who headed the ppp ‘s own Phantom Death Squad- controlled and commanded by their two Ministers : Ronald Gajraj then Home Affairs Minister now Ambassador back home in India, and Dr Leslie Ramsamy the last ppp Health Minister -‘Dr Death’ Placed in its proper context this Green’s award not only spits in the face of Guyanese History in general and on Walter Rodney’s grave in particular , but of course represents a currently updated gratuitous and insensitive slap in the face to all those decent Guyanese, and activists not only remnants of the defunct multi-racial WPA who challenged confronted denounced and defied this ppp elected Dictatorship now and against the Burnham version then. Is this another case ‘we turn now?’ Does Green’s Award presage the same racist triumphalism of the ppp victory in 1992 when the Rodney-ites who bore the brunt of Burnham’s and Green’s wrath - were excluded from Government by Cheddi Jagan? Of course not . Dr Rupert Roopnarine the newly appointed APNU Govt’s Minister of Education was Walter Rodney’s Deputy in the WPA. Roopnarine like anti-ppp scourge and scribe Freddie Kissoon would have nothing to do with the ppp’s Walter Rodney Commission of Inquiry. The problem however is that like the ppp after 1992 to 2015 who provided Burnham’s reign with retrospective cover and justification , this nonsensical award gives the ppp racists: Some small measure of undeserved and retrospective ‘I told you so’ ‘justification’ for their own historically unique decades long and unprecedented rampages of Crime Corruption and Carnage .And yes of Racialism too. Read on-Errol Harry London UK June 13 2015. WALTER RODNEY ASSASSINATION UPDATED- MORE MURDERS ALL ROUND-13 June 2013-E.Harry . See attachment below NORMAN MCLEAN : CHEDDI JAGAN'S PPP UNDER BHARRAT JAGDEO FINALLY BRINGS BURNHAM’S 1980 CHIEF OF STAFF- ‘IN FROM THE COLD’. On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:17 PM, Errol Harry <[email protected]> wrote: Please FORWARD to Bonita Harris ( Mrs Ronald Waddle) ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Errol Harry <[email protected]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:55 PM Subject: xxx NORMAN MCLEAN and RODNEY'S ASSASSINATION UPDATED-MORE MURDERS ALL ROUND. 1.Attached above-Secret embassy files from Burnham Govt Embassy in Wash. DC.-disclosed many years ago. 2.Music Straight to Gregory-'bag o' wire' Smith (RIP) and King Kong Burnham's Head http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XwD2ktTwRA Reading the recent secret Wikileaks US cable about Norman Mclean’s relatively recent de-briefings with the US ambassador to Guyana one is tempted to enter the Time-machine allegedly located in the basement of the PPP Govt’s Party HQ at un-Freedom House in Rob Street, Georgetown and rewind to 1980 and the months prior to Walter Rodney’s assassination to scrutinise the peripatetic wanderings of ‘Comrade’ Norman Mclean -Burnham's Chief Of staff at the time of the murder on 13th June 1980. The Question is : For how long has this Mclean/US axis-as revealed in this cable, existed? Unconfirmed reports place Mclean in the environs of Washington DC a few weeks prior to the 13th June 1980 , informing friends that he had come to the US to ‘collect some electronic equipment.’ Did Burnham instruct Mclean his Chief of Staff to visit a large building in Langley,Virginia to receive a package of electronics from his (the Kabaka’s) CIA controllers? Furthermore, on the night of Friday 13th June 1980, shortly after the blowing up of Dr Walter Rodney by a remote control bomb secreted in what he believed was a ‘walkie-talkie’ given to his brother by Govt undercover agent Sgt. Gregory Smith, unconfirmed reports at the time also stated that Norman Mclean hurriedly left a social gathering in Georgetown saying that he had to go to see the Dictator because he had just heard that Walter Rodney is dead. Quite apart from the fact that the Burnham/ PNC controlled media were reporting all the next day that an ’un-identified body’ was found in a car after an explosion the night before next to the Georgetown jail–(a bit of misinformation which Journalist Julian Menezes exploded with his picture of the slain revolutionary on a slab in the Georgetown morgue and had to suffer for his pains.) Quite apart from the fact that leaflets with idiotic rhymes about a ‘hickory dickory death’ were strewn outside the Rodney family home later that night after the assassination Quite apart from the fact that BBC world-service radio suddenly became unavailable that fateful week-end Quite apart from the fact that the Army falsely claimed that ‘no Sgt. Gregory Smith existed’ in their records it would seem that if these reports of Mclean’s intelligence and movements prior to and so soon after Rodney’s killing are correct, he would be at the very least a material witness at any serious Investigation into the assassination. An investigation promised by the PPP in opposition and ‘inconveniently forgotten’ after returning to power in October 1992. 19 long years ago. In fact Mrs.Patricia Rodney had reason to take the ppp Govt's Prime Minister to task a few years ago and demanded an apology for his attempt to place the blame on the Rodney family for the pp Dictatorship's failure to honour its committment. Yet the remnant's of Rodney's WPA party continue to give this ppp man ,Hinds pride of place every 13th June at the annual Tributes to Walter Rodney. Another Question: For how long will those of us with good memories allow the PPP’s PIG (Party and Its Government) to continue dishonouring its public commitment to a full Enquiry and at the same time to reserve their ‘right’ to use this heinous act as a political stick to beat up the PNC Party (of Norman Mclean and Forbes Burnham) at Election time for political gain? At the time of Walter Rodney’s assassination the Chief of Intelligence , answerable directly to Burnham and Mclean, and the man who would be the most likely candidate as controller of the assassin Gregory Smith, (apart from Harry Hinds Rip) was Berbician Godwin Mcpherson. One can only wonder exactly what Mclean, Mcpherson and Burnham were telling the US Ambassador around June 1980 . Since the Carter Administration in the US revealed in 1976 that Burnham was a paid–up CIA Agent from 1946, it does not take too much of a leap of the imagination to view Mclean’s relationship with the Americans in the context of His Master’s own History.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Groundings Volume Two, Issue Two
    Groundings Volume 2 | Issue 2 Article 1 November 2015 Groundings Volume Two, Issue Two Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/groundings Part of the African History Commons, African Studies Commons, Growth and Development Commons, International Relations Commons, Labor Economics Commons, Political Economy Commons, Political Theory Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation (2015) "Groundings Volume Two, Issue Two," Groundings: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/groundings/vol2/iss2/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Groundings by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © The Walter Rodney Foundation, November 2015 Groundings is housed within the DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University, GA Editors: Jesse Benjamin, Asha T. Rodney, and Firoze Manji Managing Editor: Aajay Murphy Contact Information: [email protected] Cover: Walter Rodney speaks with bauxite workers during a rally in Guyana. Photos through this issue were generously provided by Stefaniyemiya Ingram, Tony Maxwell Foster, Julian Plowden, Sue Ross, and Tiffany Smith. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Commission of Inquiry Appointed to Inquire And
    REPORT OF THE COMMISSION OF INQUIRY APPOINTED TO ENQUIRE AND REPORT ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE DEATH IN AN EXPLOSION OF THE LATE DR. WALTER RODNEY ON THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY AT GEORETOWN VOLUME 1: REPORT AND APPENDICES FEBRUARY 2016 Transmittal Letter Chapter 6 Contents Chapter 7 Table of Contents Chapter 8 Chapter 1 Chapter 9 Chapter 2 Tendered Exhibits Chapter 3 Procedural Rules Chapter 4 Correspondence Chapter 5 Editorial Note 1 2 Transmittal of Report of the Commission of Inquiry to enquire into and report on the circumstances surrounding the death in an explosion of the late Dr. Walter Rodney on the thirteenth day of June one thousand nine hundred and eighty at Georgetown To His Excellency David A. Granger President of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana Your Excellency, In my capacity as Chairman of the Walter Rodney Commission of Inquiry, I have the honour to submit the Report of the Inquiry to which the President appointed us by Instrument dated 8th February, 2014. The Commissioners were, in the Instrument of Appointment, expected to submit their Report within ten (10) weeks from the start of the Commission. The Commission started its work on 28th April, 2014. As we understand it, the premise informing the early submission date was that the Commission coming thirty-four (34) years after the death of Dr. Walter Rodney and the events surrounding that event, would, in all probability, be supported by only a few persons volunteering to give evidence and/or having an interest in this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korean Mass Games and Third Worldism in Guyana, 1980-1992 「鍛錬 された民のみぞ国づくりに役立つ」ガイアナにおける北朝鮮のマスゲー ムと第三世界主義 1980-1992
    Volume 13 | Issue 4 | Number 2 | Article ID 4258 | Jan 26, 2015 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus 'Only a disciplined people can build a nation': North Korean Mass Games and Third Worldism in Guyana, 1980-1992 「鍛錬 された民のみぞ国づくりに役立つ」ガイアナにおける北朝鮮のマスゲー ムと第三世界主義 1980-1992 Moe Taylor Abstract: As the 1970s drew to a close, Forbes appealing to a certain widespread longing Burnham (1923-85), Guyana's controversial within Guyanese culture for a more leader of 21 years, received Pyongyang's "disciplined" society. assistance in importing the North Korean tradition of Mass Games, establishing them as a major facet of the nation's cultural and political life during the 1980-92 period. The Introduction current study documents this episode in In the final months of 1979, while the Iran Guyanese history and seeks to explain why the hostage crisis and the Soviet invasion of Burnham regime prioritized such an Afghanistan dominated international headlines, experiment in a time of austerity and crisis, its the approximately 750,000 citizens of the South ideological foundations, and how Guyanese American republic of Guyana (formerly British interpreted and responded to Mass Games. Guiana) were informed by state-owned media I argue that the Burnham regime's enthusiasm about the coming arrival of a strange and for Mass Games can in large part be explained mysterious new thing called Mass Games, a by their adherence to a particular tradition of spectacle event that would be, according to one socialist thought which holds education and editorial, "the most magnificent in the history 1 culture as the foundation of development.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Cheddi Jagan National Assembly Speeches Volume 5 with a Preface by Dr
    DR. CHEDDI JAGAN NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SPEECHES VOLUME 5 The National Assembly of the Second Parliament of Guyana February 1969 -December 1972 1 Dr. Cheddi Jagan National Assembly Speeches Volume 5 With a Preface by Dr. Roger Luncheon This edition © The Government of Guyana, 2011 Preface © Roger Luncheon 2010 Cover design by Peepal Tree Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form without permission. This publication was made possible by the support of the Peepal Tree Press (Leeds), the University of Warwick Yesu Persaud Centre for Caribbean Stud- ies, and the Government of Guyana. ISBN 978-1-907493-28-7 2 PREFACE Dr. Jagan was first elected to the Legislature of British Guiana in 1947 and served until 1992, a span of almost fifty years in elected public office. Dur- ing his period as a Legislator/Member of Parliament 1947 – 1953, Dr. Jagan served as an elected member; as a Head of Government 1957 – 1964 in the pre Independence period; and as a Leader of the Opposition Party in Par- liament 1964 – 1992, until the PPP was returned to power in 1992. In 1997, he died in Office as Head of State and Head of the PPP/Civic Government. Compiled in chronological order, these volumes contain Dr. Jagan’s speeches made in Legislative Assembly/Parliament during his long career there. These speeches reflect his consummate attention to events that de- veloped during the important periods in Guyana, the Caribbean region and the world. Dr. Jagan was elected and entered the Legislative Assembly in the colo- nial era.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Change, Democracy, and Human Rights in Guyana
    ThirdWorld Quarterly, Vol 18, No 2, pp 267± 285, 1997 Political change,democracy, and humanrights in Guyana IVELAWL GRIFFITH Theannals of Guyana’ s politicalhistory will surely record 1992 as anhistoric year,for that year was amilestonein thetransition from authoritarian politics to democraticpolitics. Also signi® cant was theemergence from the political wildernessof Cheddie Jagan. Having ® rst enteredpolitics in 1946, Jagan was oustedfrom power by the British in 1953, and again in 1964, in collusion with theUSA, because of his communist orientation. Ironically, though, it was the USAitself that helped to engineer his return to power in 1992. The circum- stances thatled to the re-emergence of Jagan, and his re-emergence itself, have usheredin a newera inGuyanese politics, one which spotlights the triumphs andpitfalls of democracy and human rights in South America’ s onlyEnglish- speakingrepublic. Politicalanalysts accept that the status and conduct of both democracy and humanrights in various parts of the world are in¯uenced by the nature and operationof the political regime governing a particularsociety. With this in mind,this article examines the relationship between regime change and democ- racyand human rights in Guyana. The analysis shows that there has beenboth changeand continuity over the past decade; change in regime and regime politicsand policies, and continuity in regime policies that conditioned the environmentto pursuedemocracy. In Guyana, the constitution and the approach ofpolitical elites incorporate civil and political rights as wellas economicand socialones. However, given the link between the attainment of the latter set of rightsand the economic health of society on the one hand, and Guyana’ s economicdoldrums on the other, it is unreasonableto expect any major near-termadvancement in economic and social rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Information Events & Dates On
    Parliament of Guyana HISTORICAL INFORMATION EVENTS & DATES ON THE PARLIAMENT OF GUYANA fromCompiled 1718 and Produced to 2006 by Frank A. Narain, A.A., C.C.H., Former Clerk of the National Assembly 15th January, 2007 Knowledge is of two kinds. We know a subject ourselves, or We know where we can find information on it - Samuel Johnson, English poet, critic, and lexicographer (1709-84) This copy of this File with the Historical Information on the Parliament of Guyana from 1718 to 2006 which has been Compiled and Produced By Frank A. Narain Former Clerk of the National Assembly has been Presented To …………………….…………………………..…………… ………………….……………………………..…………… With the Compliments of Frank A. Narain © 2009 Parliament of Guyana 1 PART I PRELIMINARY Contents Preface and Introduction Abbreviations used in this File Sources of Information 2 CONTENTS Part I - Preliminary 1. Preface and Introduction 11 2. Abbreviations used in this File 19 3. Sources of Information 20 Part II - Arrivals 4. The Discovery of the Country 23 5. First Arrivals and Settlers in and Ownership of the Colonies 24 Part III - Legislative Periods, Names of Legislative Bodies, First Members of Legislative Bodies, and Some Events with Dates 1718-2006 6. 1718 to 1803 The Dutch Law-Making Body – The Court of Policy 29 7. 1803 to 1928 Ownership by the British -Continuation of the Dutch Court of Policy 30 8. 1928 to 1930 British Crown Colony- The First Legislative Council of British Guiana 32 9. 1930 to 1935 The Second Legislative Council 33 10. 1935 to 1947 The Third Legislative Council 35 11. 1947 to 1953 The Fourth Legislative Council 37 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Vice President and Max V. Krebs, US Ambassador-Designate to Guyana
    Digitized from Box 65 of the Gerald R. Ford Vice Presidential Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON 6e:NFlf)Et~TI:A L THE VICE PRESIDENT IS MEETING WITH AMBASSADOR MAX V. KREBS Thursday, June 27, 1974 5 :15 p. m. (15 minute s) Executive Office Building Office From: • V l&'.USSIfED 1.0. 12951. Sec. 3.5 I. PURPOSE r:~~:~GII~M=_~ To receive the Ambassador for a brief courtesy call. II. BACKGROUND, PARTICIPANTS, PRESS PLAN A. Background: Ambassador Krebs (biography at Tab A) requested the opportunity to pay a courtesy call on you while he is in Washington on consultation. He is a career Foreign Service officer who was appointed Ambassador to Guyana by the President early this year. Prior to that he was Deputy Chief of Mission in Buenos Aires, where he served as Charg~ dlAffaires after the departure of Ambassador John Davis Lodge. B. Participants: Ambassador Max V. Krebs and John O. Marsh. C. Press plan: To be announced. III. TALKING POINTS A. You may wish to note your pleasure in meeting the Ambassador and express your interest in hearing his impressions of Guyana and of the government of Prime Minister Forbes Burnham. B. Ambassador Krebs may note a potential problem in U. S. -Guyana relations if Guyana nationalizes the Reynolds subsidiary which mines bauxite there. Prime Minister Burnham, in following a program of expanding government control of resource -2­ exploitation, nationalized the Canadian-owned bauxite and alum.ina com.pany (a subsidiary of Alcan) in 1971. Com.pensation was provided.
    [Show full text]
  • IN CONFIDENCE -CLIVE LLOYD CRICKET SUPER-STAR: .. If Anyone Has His Email Address, Kindly Forward This to Sir Clive From: Errol
    IN CONFIDENCE -CLIVE LLOYD CRICKET SUPER-STAR: .. If anyone has his email address, kindly forward this to Sir Clive From: Errol M Harry-.London- Date 16 March 2015 A Confidential letter to Sir Clive Lloyd with an Urgent Request: After the brutal assassination in Guyana last week of anti-ppp Regime Political Activist Courtney Crum-Ewing, you are respectfully requested to now make contact with the APNU-AFC Opposition Coalition to arrange a photo-opportunity appearance alongside Moses Nagamootoo(AFC) and David Granger(PNC) on their Election platform similar and equal to the one you afforded Margaret Thatcher’s 1983 Re-election Campaign at Wembley stadium... Dear Clive, Since you do not know me personally I do hope that my first-name familiarity is not considered an impertinence but I am sure that you appreciate that to all Guyanese at home or abroad you are still our very own Clive, our National hero ... I also appreciate that in the perilous times in which our country finds itself it might be considered ill-advised even risky to accede to the request above : to lend your considerable popular appeal and celebrity status to the pro-democratic pro-decency and anti-racism , Campaign for real change in our benighted country and for which Mr Crum-Ewing’s life was taken. This is him below Nevertheless the cash-strapped Guyanese Opposition Coalition desperately needs your contributions (and from many other celebrities) at this crucial time in our history. Clive these are days when even Guyanese Ambassadors abroad are keeping a very low profile. But as I hope you will any similar decision of yours to keep your own counsel and remain aloof will find yourself in very bad company indeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering Democracy: Problems and Solutions to the Guyana Quagmire
    Pouvoirs dans la Caraïbe Revue du CRPLC 11 | 1999 Cuba Recovering democracy: problems and solutions to the Guyana quagmire Ralph R. Premdas Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/plc/485 DOI: 10.4000/plc.485 ISSN: 2117-5209 Publisher L’Harmattan Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1999 Number of pages: 135-173 ISSN: 1279-8657 Electronic reference Ralph R. Premdas, « Recovering democracy: problems and solutions to the Guyana quagmire », Pouvoirs dans la Caraïbe [Online], 11 | 1999, Online since 14 March 2011, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/plc/485 ; DOI : 10.4000/plc.485 © Pouvoirs dans la Caraïbe Recovering democracy : problems and solutions to the Guyana quagmire by Ralph R. PREMDAS1 Professor of Public Policy University of the West Indies St. Augustine Trinidad and Tobago In 1992 when free and fair elections were conducted for the first time since 1964 in Guyana, a brief euphoric moment of positive change was simultaneously accompanied by a set of long term difficulties which five years later would return to haunt the nation reducing its democratic prospects to shambles. The Carter Center was the midwife which delivered the electoral triumph overseeing a deeply embedded proclivity of the ruling Peoples National Congress (PNC) to rig elections. While this benefitted Guyanese in restoring democracy, the change failed to alter the fundamentals of the Guyanese institutional order which in the first instance accounted for the communal strife. More specifically, the Carter people in their intense preoccupation with sanitizing the mechanical minutiae of the electoral machinery, lost sight of the perverse political institutions involving zero-sum competition for office which virtually conferred total control of the state to one community denying participation to the defeated other.
    [Show full text]
  • GUYANA Date of Elections: 9 December 1985 Purpose Of
    GUYANA Date of Elections: 9 December 1985 Purpose of Elections Elections were held for all the seats in Parliament on the normal expiry of the members' term of office. Characteristics of Parliament Under the 1980 Constitution, the unicameral Parliament of Guyana, the National Assembly, comprises 53 members elected by universal suffrage for 5 years, 10 members elected by 10 Regional Democratic Councils and 2 members elected by the National Con­ gress of Local Democratic Organs. The Speaker, Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries who are not elected Assembly members are in addition deemed parliamentarians, although they have no voting rights; these currently number 17 altogether. Total membership thus now stands at 82. Electoral System All Guyanese citizens who are at least 18 years of age as well as Commonwealth citizens who are domiciled and resident in Guyana and have been so resident for a period of at least one year are entitled to vote. Disqualified are the insane and certain persons who have been convicted of election-connected offences. There exists a National Register of electors which is revised prior to each election. Voting is not compulsory. Guyanese citizens of at least 18 years of age who are able to speak and read the English language with a degree of proficiency sufficient to enable them to take an active part in the proceedings of the Assembly qualify for election as National Assembly members. Dis­ qualified are persons owing allegiance to a foreign State, those under sentence of death or serving a sentence of imprisonment exceeding six months, the insane, certain public officials, members of the armed and police forces, and certain government contractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Guyana at the Cross Roads: Beyond Ethnic Paramountcy
    GUYANA AT THE CROSS ROADS: BEYOND ETHNIC PARAMOUNTCY SELWYN RYAN Guyana today stands poised at the cross roads and might well be on the brink of a political disaster of enormous magnitude. Whether that disaster occurs or not depends very much on the outcome of the impending general elections which all agree is the most critical in the country's history. Given the plural nature of Guyanese society, every election has in a sense been a critical election. This is so because elections in Guyana are not merely about which party, which programme, or which ideology prevails. More fundamentally, elections determine which racial group enjoys hegemony, which one is "on topw. The race issue has always dominated Guyana's politics, but more so since 1953 when Guyana's first election under universal suffrage was held. The salience of the race factor has continued to give to politics in Guyana its peculiar quality of violence and ethnic confrontation. The demographic pattern has also helped to aggravate Guyana's political predicament. According to 1970 Census data, the ethnic distribution of the population was Indo-Guyanese 51.8 percent, Afro-Guyanese 31.2 percent, Mixed 10.3 percent, Chinese 0.5 percent and Amerindi- an 4.9 percent. The 1980 Census figures were not very different except that, the Chinese and the European population had declined by 45 and 65 percent respectively due largely to migration. Indians accounted for 51.4 percent, Africans for 30.5 percent, mixed 11 percent, Europeans 0.1 percent, Chinese 0.2 percent, Amerindians 5.3 percent, and "not statedw 1.1 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM AUTOCRACY to DEMOCRACY in Guyana Aspects of Post-Independence Guyanese History (1966-1992)
    ODEEN ISHMAEL FROM AUTOCRACY TO DEMOCRACY in guyana Aspects of Post-Independence Guyanese History (1966-1992) FROM AUTOCRACY TO DEMOCRACY IN GUYANA Aspects of Post-Independence Guyanese History (1966-1992) Odeen Ishmael GNI Publications Georgetown Boston Toronto 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Odeen Ishmael All rights reserved. Contents Contents Introduction vii 1. The Ankoko incursion 1 2. The political and economic situation in 1966-67 9 3. Aspects of Guyana’s foreign policy during 1966-1970 19 4. Economic aggression and new maritime claims by Venezuela (1967-1968) 30 5. How the American government helped Burnham to rig the 1968 elections 39 6. The 1968 electoral fraud 50 7. The Rupununi revolt 58 8. The fraudulent local government elections in 1970 82 9. The Protocol of Port of Spain 91 10. The rigged elections in 1973 99 11. The PNC regime’s shifting ideological positions in the 1970s 107 12. The PNC’s nationalisation policy in the 1970s 113 13. The failure of the “Feed, House and Clothe the Nation” plan 118 14. Guyana-Suriname border issue: From the 1960s to the 1990s 126 15. The offer of critical support by the PPP 132 16. The Arnold Rampersaud trials 141 17. The PPP proposal for a National Patriotic Front 149 18. The Upper Mazaruni hydro-electric project 156 19. The rigged referendum of 1978 167 20. Mass murder, secret plots and assassinations (1978-1980) 175 21. The elusive search for political unity (1975-1982) 182 22. The 135-day sugar industry strike 190 23. The pattern of political repression by the PNC regime 202 24.
    [Show full text]