DOCSLIB.ORG

Monthly Report May 2017 FINAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monthly Report May 2017 FINAL Q R A Monthly Report May 2017 www.qldreconstrucon.org.au Monthly Report ‐ May 2017 1 Document details: Security classificaon Public Date of review of security classificaon May 2017 Authority Queensland Reconstrucon Authority Author Chief Execuve Officer Document status Final Version 1.0 Contact for Enquiries: All enquiries regarding this document should be directed to: Queensland Reconstrucon Authority Phone the call centre ‐ 1800 110 841 Mailing Address Queensland Reconstrucon Authority PO Box 15428 City East Q 4002 Alternavely, contact the Queensland Reconstrucon Authority by emailing [email protected] Licence This material is licensed under a Creave Commons ‐ Aribuon 3.0 Australia licence. The Queensland Reconstrucon Authority requests aribuon in the following manner: © The State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstrucon Authority) 2011‐2015 Informaon security This document has been classified using the Queensland Government Informaon Security Classificaon Framework (QGISCF) as PUBLIC and will be managed according to the requirements of the QGISCF. Monthly Report ‐ May 2017 2 www.qldreconstrucon.org.au Message from the Chief Execuve Officer Major General Richard Wilson AO (Ret’d) Chairman Queensland Reconstrucon Authority Dear Major General Wilson It is with pleasure that I present the May 2017 Monthly Report – the 75th report to the Board of the Queensland Reconstrucon Authority (QRA). QRA was established under the Queensland Reconstrucon Authority Act 2011 (the Act) following the unprecedented natural disasters that struck Queensland over the summer months of 2010‐11. The Authority is charged with helping Queensland communies effecvely and efficiently recover from the impacts of natural disasters through managing and coordinang the Queensland Government’s program of infrastructure renewal and recovery within disaster‐affected communies and being the state’s lead agency responsible for disaster recovery, resilience and migaon policy. Since the last report, Queensland has connued with the recovery efforts following the devastang impacts of Severe Tropical Cyclone Debbie in late March/April 2017. To date, 35 local government areas in Queensland have been acvated for joint Commonwealth/State Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements (NDRRA) assistance as a result of the event. The May report profiles how a number of NDRRA projects that have been made more resilient with funding from the 2015 Beerment fund withstood the severe weather unleashed by Cyclone Debbie and subsequent flooding. The report also highlights how the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) is using innovave technology to fast‐track damage collecon from the event and how the cyclone impacted one of TMR’s key reconstrucon projects in delivery. The May report incorporates updated NDRRA damage esmates for the 23 events from the 2015, 2016 and 2017 disaster periods that QRA is currently managing through the delivery phase, including preliminary esmates for Severe Tropical Cyclone Debbie and other 2017 events. Of the esmated $1.8 billion program of reconstrucon works for the 23 events in the delivery phase, $673 million has been approved by QRA and addional submissions worth $125 million are being assessed by QRA or awaing addional informaon. QRA is working with delivery agents to expedite the progress their preparaon of submissions for the remaining program. In addion $426 million (24%) of works in relaon to the delivery program has been reported to QRA at 31 March as in progress or delivered. The May report also provides an update on progress in other recovery, resilience and migaon acvies. The report profiles the recent launch of the Brisbane River Catchment Flood Study, the most comprehensive flood study ever undertaken in Australia. The flood study maps the Brisbane River’s behaviour across the four council areas of Brisbane, Ipswich, Somerset and Lockyer Valley in South East Queensland with outcomes expected to lead to beer land use planning, migaon and infrastructure works, community awareness and disaster response management. I commend the report to you and recommend its release to the Minister and the public pursuant to Secon 41 of the Act. Yours sincerely Brendan Moon Chief Execuve Officer Queensland Reconstrucon Authority 3 www.qldreconstrucon.org.au Monthly Report ‐ May 2017 3 Contents 1.0 Introducon 1 1.1 Purpose 2 1.2 Timing 2 2.0 Disaster Assistance 3 2.1 Queensland Disaster Assistance Framework 4 2.2 Events and relief measures managed by QRA 5 3.0 Program Status 6 3.1 NDRRA program status 7 3.2 Recovery, resilience and migaon acvies 10 3.3 Program spotlights 12 4.0 Communicaons 15 4.1 Communicang progress 16 4.2 Media reports 17 Appendices Appendix A: Local Government Areas by Region 20 Appendix B: NDRRA acvaons managed by QRA ‐ 2007 to 2014 Events 21 Monthly Report ‐ May 2017 4 www.qldreconstrucon.org.au Secon one: Introduction 1 www.qldreconstrucon.org.au Monthly Report ‐ May 2017 1 1.0 Introducon 1.1 Purpose The Queensland Reconstrucon Authority (QRA) was established on 21 February 2011 under the Queensland Reconstrucon Authority Act 2011 (the Act) following the extensive series of natural disasters that impacted Queensland over the summer of 2010‐11. QRA’s mission is to reconnect, rebuild and improve Queensland communiƟes and its economy. QRA is charged with managing and coordinang the Government’s program of infrastructure renewal and recovery within disaster‐ affected communies, with a focus on working with our state and local government partners to deliver best pracce expenditure of public reconstrucon funds. QRA is also the state’s lead agency responsible for disaster recovery, resilience and migaon policy. In this role QRA is working collaboravely with other agencies and key stakeholders to improve risk reducon and disaster preparedness. Inially established for a two‐year period, QRA was extended a number of mes as its role expanded to cover historical and connuing disaster events. In June 2015, QRA was made permanent, enabling it to connue the crical work of helping Queensland communies effecvely and efficiently recover from the impacts of natural disasters. As part of its role, QRA administers the rebuilding program for Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements (NDRRA) acvated disaster events and is responsible for the acquial of NDRRA funding including Counter Disaster Operaons, Emergent Works, Restoraon of Essenal Public Assets, Category C and Category D assistance to State Departments and Agencies (SDA) and Local Government Authories (LGA). Since its establishment in February 2011, QRA has managed and coordinated the infrastructure reconstrucon and recovery for 64 disaster events acvated for NDRRA relief measures. 1.2 Timing The Commonwealth NDRRA Determinaon imposes me limits for the delivery and acquial of works. The Determinaon provides for a me limit of two financial years aer a disaster to deliver reconstrucon works and a further nine months aer the end of the financial year in which the works were completed in order to acquit the works. NDRRA funding is formally acquied through the annual submission of a financial statement to the Commonwealth comprising claims for financial assistance in respect of state NDRRA expenditure incurred on eligible disasters in the preceding financial year (Commonwealth Claim). Lodgement of Commonwealth Claims is required to secure reimbursement of the Commonwealth’s share of eligible expenditure. As QRA is managing a series of events that occurred across a number of financial years, QRA’s program is spread across various stages in the delivery and acquial phases as follows: Works for 32 disaster events acvated for the 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 event periods are currently in the delivery and/or acquial phases. Subject to acceptance of the 2015‐16 NDRRA Claim by the Commonwealth and other than a small number of projects that received extensions of me for drought‐related impacts, QRA has now finalised the close out of all works up to and including the 2014 events. On 23 March 2017, QRA submied the 2015‐16 NDRRA Claim to the Commonwealth for works completed to 30 June 2016. QRA is acvely engaging with the Commonwealth to facilitate its assurance acvies in order to progress the acquial and reimbursement as soon as possible. QRA is currently working with delivery agents to progress delivery of the 2015 and 2016 event programs and provide advice and assistance with damage assessments and submission preparaon for the more recent 2017 events, including Severe Tropical Cyclone Debbie. Monthly Report ‐ May 2017 2 www.qldreconstrucon.org.au Secon two: Disaster Assistance 33 www.qldreconstrucon.org.au Monthly Report ‐ May 2017 3 2.0 Disaster Assistance 2.1 Queensland Disaster Assistance Framework The available Queensland Disaster Assistance schemes are separated between NDRRA (jointly funded by the Commonwealth and State governments) and non‐NDRRA funding schemes. The diagram below indicates the different elements of assistance available and how each element operates. Figure 2.1.1 Queensland Disaster Assistance Framework Elements of the assistance schemes are delivered by State agencies, however all NDRRA assistance sources (and elements of the non‐ NDRRA assistance schemes) are administered by QRA for historical and connuing disaster events in Queensland. Disaster events managed by QRA The list of the acvated disaster events managed by QRA are set out in Secon 2.2 and can also be found on www.disaster.qld.gov.au. This report includes references to event periods described as follows: 2017 events: Acvated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Volume 31, Number
    Presented at AFAC16 - the annual conference of AFAC and the Bushfire and Natural Hazards Research CRC in Brisbane, August 2016. ABSTRACT This paper presents research Building community from collaboration between the Cyclone Testing Station (CTS) cyclone resilience at James Cook University and insurer Suncorp over the last two years. A key outcome of through academic and this work has been an insurance premium reduction program by Suncorp known as the insurance industry ‘Cyclone Resilience Benefit’. Background research conducted for the program by the CTS partnership is discussed and its details are briefly reviewed. Insights Jon Harwood, Suncorp Group Limited, and Dr Daniel J. Smith and from the program delivery to Dr David Henderson, Cyclone Testing Station, detail an academic- over 14 000 homeowners to industry partnership to bring cost benefits to cyclone-prone date are discussed. Although still in preliminary stages, the communities. development of this industry program based on academic research demonstrates the benefits of strategic Introduction partnerships in the field of Australia’s annual insured losses due to natural disasters exceed $480 million natural disaster risk mitigation. on average (ICA 2014), continuously highlighting the need for well-designed Figure 1: Insurance losses by natural hazard (ICA 2014). homes and infrastructure. Cyclone and severe storm events are particularly costly, contributing to nearly half of all nominal natural hazard insurance losses over the period from 1970–2013 (see Figure 1). While cyclone events are relatively infrequent, the resulting losses are excessive and the risk associated with insuring properties in cyclonic regions of Australia (e.g. Queensland) has led to affordability issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclone Factsheet UPDATE
    TROPICAL CYCLONES AND CLIMATE CHANGE: FACTSHEET CLIMATECOUNCIL.ORG.AU TROPICAL CYCLONES AND CLIMATE CHANGE: FACT SHEET KEY POINTS • Climate change is increasing the destructive power of tropical cyclones. o All weather events today, including tropical cyclones, are occurring in an atmosphere that is warmer, wetter, and more energetic than in the past. o It is likely that maximum windspeeds and the amount of rainfall associated with tropical cyclones is increasing. o Climate change may also be affecting many other aspects of tropical cyclone formation and behaviour, including the speed at which they intensify, the speed at which a system moves (known as translation speed), and how much strength is retained after reaching land – all factors that can render them more dangerous. o In addition, rising sea levels mean that the storm surges that accompany tropical cyclones are even more damaging. • While climate change may mean fewer tropical cyclones overall, those that do form can become more intense and costly. In other words, we are likely to see more of the really strong and destructive tropical cyclones. • A La Niña event brings an elevated tropical cyclone risk for Australia, as there are typically more tropical cyclones in the Australian region than during El Niño years. BACKGROUND Tropical cyclones, known as hurricanes in the North Atlantic and Northeast Pacific, typhoons in the Northwest Pacific, and simply as tropical cyclones in the South Pacific and Indian Oceans, are among the most destructive of extreme weather events. Many Pacific Island Countries, including Fiji, Vanuatu, Solomon Islands and Tonga, lie within the South Pacific cyclone basin.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Sees Ex-Tropical Cyclone Gillian's Remnants Persist 20 March 2014
    NASA sees ex-Tropical Cyclone Gillian's remnants persist 20 March 2014 (PR) instrument revealed that intense convective storms in this area were still dropping rain at a rate of over 97 mm/3.8 inches per hour and returning radar reflectivity values of over 51dBZ. TRMM PR data were used to create a simulated 3-D view that showed the vertical structure of precipitation within the stormy area contained towering thunderstorms. The Joint Typhoon Warning Center noted that animated enhanced satellite imagery on March 20 showed flaring deep convection associated with a slowly-consolidating low-level circulation center. On March 20, the Tropical Cyclone Warning Centre in Jakarta noted that Gillian's remnants had maximum sustained winds near 25 knots/28.7 mph/46.3 kph. It was centered near 9.4 south and 119.0 east, about 233 nautical miles/ 268.1 miles/431.5 km east of South Kuta, Bali, Indonesia. TRMM passed above Gillian's remnants on March 20, TCWC issued watches and warnings for parts of 2014, and this 3-D simulation of TRMM data showed the Indonesia archipelago in Bahasa. several of the tallest thunderstorms in Gillian's remnants were reaching heights of over 15.75 km/9.8 miles. Credit: NASA/SSAI, Hal Pierce NASA's TRMM satellite continues to follow the remnants of former Tropical Cyclone Gillian as it moved from the Southern Pacific Ocean into the Southern Indian Ocean where it appears to be re- organizing. The persistent remnants of tropical cyclone Gillian have moved westward over 2,700 km/1,674 miles since forming in the Gulf of Carpentaria on March 8, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bathurst Bay Hurricane: Media, Memory and Disaster
    The Bathurst Bay Hurricane: Media, Memory and Disaster Ian Bruce Townsend Bachelor of Arts (Communications) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry Abstract In 1899, one of the most powerful cyclones recorded struck the eastern coast of Cape York, Queensland, resulting in 298 known deaths, most of whom were foreign workers of the Thursday Island pearling fleets. Today, Australia’s deadliest cyclone is barely remembered nationally, although there is increasing interest internationally in the cyclone’s world record storm surge by scientists studying past cyclones to assess the risks of future disasters, particularly from a changing climate. The 1899 pearling fleet disaster, attributed by Queensland Government meteorologist Clement Wragge to a cyclone he named Mahina, has not until now been the subject of scholarly historical inquiry. This thesis examines the evidence, as well as the factors that influenced how the cyclone and its disaster have been remembered, reported, and studied. Personal and public archives were searched for references to, and evidence for, the event. A methodology was developed to test the credibility of documents and the evidence they contained, including the data of interest to science. Theories of narrative and memory were applied to those documents to show how and why evidence changed over time. Finally, the best evidence was used to reconstruct aspects of the event, including the fate of several communities, the cyclone’s track, and the elements that contributed to the internationally significant storm tide. The thesis concludes that powerful cultural narratives were responsible for the nation forgetting a disaster in which 96 percent of the victims were considered not to be citizens of the anticipated White Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Results for the Mackay-Whitsunday 2018 Report Card
    RESULTS FOR THE MACKAY-WHITSUNDAY-ISAAC 2018 REPORT CARD ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS Authorship statement The Mackay-Whitsunday-Isaac Healthy Rivers to Reef Healthy Partnership (Partnership) Results for Environmental Indicators for the Mackay-Whitsunday-Isaac 2018 Report Card technical report was compiled by the Partnership’s Technical Officers, Alysha Lee and Jessica Gillespie. Substantial input was received from the Regional Report Cards Technical Working Group (TWG) members. Some content was also drawn from technical reports from earlier Mackay-Whitsunday report cards. Regional Report Cards Technical Working Group members Diane Tarte (TWG Chair July 2018 onwards) Adam Fletcher Paulina Kaniewska Nicola Stokes Richard Hunt Reinier Mann Tegan Whitehead Angus Thompson Emma Maxwell Nathan Waltham Alysha Lee Alex Carter Jessica Gillespie Michael Rasheed Carl Mitchell Glynis Orr Nyssa Henry Luke Galea Michael Holmes Eddie Jebreen David Moffatt Ken Rhode Andrew Moss Travis Sydes Lynne Powell Lyndon Llewellyn Judith Wake Nadine Marshall Donna Audas Paul Groves Chris Dench Stephen Lewis Michael Nash Chris Manning Melinda Louden Adam Folkers Acknowledgements The authors also thank Phillip Trendell, Bernie Cockayne, Bronwyn Houlden, Carol Honchin, Len McKenzie, Jamie Corfield and Matt Curnock for their technical input into various aspects of document development and/or their review of the document. Members of the Reef Independent Science Panel are also gratefully acknowledged for their advice and review of this document. Suggested citation Mackay-Whitsunday-Isaac Healthy Rivers to Reef Partnership (2019). Results for the Mackay- Whitsunday-Isaac 2018 Report Card: Environmental Indicators, Technical Report. Mackay- Whitsunday-Isaac Healthy Rivers to Reef Partnership, Mackay. This technical report was finalised and released online in November 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) Has Been Prepared to Ensure There Is a Consistant Approach to Diaster Management in the Livingstone Shire
    F Document Set ID: 8554803 Version: 1, Version Date: 17/09/2020 FOREWORD Foreword by the Chair, Andrew Ireland of the Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Group. The Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) has been prepared to ensure there is a consistant approach to Diaster Management in the Livingstone Shire. This plan is an important tool for managing potential disasters and is a demonstrated commitment towards enhancing the safety of the Livingstone Shire community. The plan identifies potential hazards and risks in the area, identifies steps to mitigate these risks and includes strategies to enact should a hazard impact and cause a disaster. This plan has been developed to be consistant with the Disaster Management Standards and Guidelines and importantly to intergrate into the Queensland Disaster Management Arrangements (QDMA). The primary focus is to help reduce the potential adverse effect of an event by conducting activities before, during or after to help reduce loss of human life, illness or injury to humans, property loss or damage, or damage to the environment. I am confident the LDMP provides a comprehensive framework for our community, and all residents and vistors to our region can feel secure that all agenices involved in the Livingstone Shire LDMP are dedicated and capable with a shared responsibility in disaster management. On behalf of the Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Group, I would like to thank you for taking the time to read this important plan. Livingstone Shire Council Mayor Andrew Ireland Chair, Local Disaster Management Group Dated: 26 August 2020 Page 2 of 175 ECM # xxxxxx Version 6 Document Set ID: 8554803 Version: 1, Version Date: 17/09/2020 ENDORSEMENT This Local Disaster Management Plan (LDMP) has been prepared by the Livingstone Shire Local Disaster Management Group for the Livingstone Shire Council as required under section 57 of the Disaster Management Act 2003 (the Act).
    [Show full text]
  • 189930408.Pdf
    © The University of Queensland and James Cook University, 2018 Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority ISSN: 2208-4134 Marine Monitoring Program: Annual report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2016-2017 is licensed for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 4.0 International licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logos of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, The University of Queensland and James Cook University, any other material protected by a trademark, content supplied by third parties and any photographs. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0 This publication should be cited as: Grant, S., Thompson, K., Paxman, C., Elisei, G., Gallen C., Tracey, D., Kaserzon, S., Jiang, H., Samanipour, S. and Mueller, J. 2018, Marine Monitoring Program: Annual report for inshore pesticide monitoring 2016-2017. Report for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, 128 pp. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the National Library of Australia Front cover image: Turbid river plume emerging from the Russell-Mulgrave river mouth following several days of heavy rainfall in February 2015 © Dieter Tracey, 2015 DISCLAIMER While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this document are factually correct, UQ and JCU do not make any representation or give any warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, currency or suitability for any particular purpose of the information or statements contained in this document. To the extent permitted by law UQ and JCU shall not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Tropical Cyclone Ita Assessment of Intertidal Seagrass Status in Dugong and Green Turtle Feeding Grounds ‐ Jeannie River to Cape Bedford (Cape York)
    Extreme Weather Incident Response Post Tropical Cyclone Ita assessment of intertidal seagrass status in dugong and green turtle feeding grounds ‐ Jeannie River to Cape Bedford (Cape York) Len McKenzie, Rob Coles, Louise Johns & Jessica Leech Report No. 14/25 May 2014 i Information should be cited as: McKenzie, LJ., Coles, R., Johns, L. and Leech, J. 2014, ‘Post Tropical Cyclone Ita assessment of intertidal seagrass status in dugong and green turtle feeding grounds ‐ Jeannie River to Cape Bedford (Cape York)’. Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) report 14/25. Cairns, James Cook University, Cairns. 20 pp. For further information contact: Len McKenzie Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University [email protected] PO Box 6811 Cairns QLD 4870 This publication has been compiled by the Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University. Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ © James Cook University, 2014. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of the work may in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or any other means be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or be broadcast or transmitted without the prior written permission of TropWATER. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The copyright owner shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Acknowledgments: This project was funded by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) and the Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Cairns.
    [Show full text]
  • Declines of Seagrasses in a Tropical Harbour, North Queensland, Australia, Are Not the Result of a Single Event
    Declines of seagrasses in a tropical harbour, North Queensland, Australia, are not the result of a single event SKYE MCKENNA*, JESSIE JARVIS, TONIA SANKEY, CARISSA REASON, ROBERT COLES and MICHAEL RASHEED Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia *Corresponding author (Email, [email protected]) A recent paper inferred that all seagrass in Cairns Harbour, tropical north-eastern Australia, had undergone ‘complete and catastrophic loss’ as a result of tropical cyclone Yasi in 2011. While we agree with the concern expressed, we would like to correct the suggestion that the declines were the result of a single climatic event and that all seagrass in Cairns Harbour were lost. Recent survey data and trend analysis from an on-ground monitoring program show that seagrasses in Cairns Harbour do remain, albeit at low levels, and the decline in seagrasses occurred over several years with cyclone Yasi having little additional impact. We have conducted annual on-ground surveys of seagrass distribution and the above-ground meadow biomass in Cairns Harbour and Trinity Inlet since 2001. This has shown a declining trend in biomass since a peak in 2004 and in area since it peaked in 2007. In 2012, seagrass area and above-ground biomass were significantly below the long-term (12 year) average but seagrass was still present. Declines were associated with regional impacts on coastal seagrasses from multiple years of above-average rainfall and severe storm and cyclone activity, similar to other nearby seagrass areas, and not as a result of a single event. [McKenna S, Jarvis J, Sankey T, Reason C, Coles R and Rasheed M 2015 Declines of seagrasses in a tropical harbour, North Queensland, Australia, are not the result of a single event.
    [Show full text]
  • Severe Tropical Cyclone Marcia: an Examination of Information and Warnings Broadcasted to Inform Mitigation and Community Preparedness
    Severe Tropical Cyclone Marcia: an examination of information and warnings broadcasted to inform mitigation and community preparedness Kevin Ronan CQ University, Bushfire and Naturual Hazards CRC Bruce Gunn Bureau of Meteorology Deanne Bird Risk Frontiers, University of Iceland AFAC16 CONFERENCE PAPER Severe Tropical Cyclone Marcia: An examination of information and warnings broadcasted to inform mitigation and community preparedness Deanne Bird1, 2, Shannon Panchuk3, Kevin Ronan4, Linda Anderson-Berry3, Christine Hanley5, Shelby Canterford6, Ian Mannix7, Bruce Gunn3 1 Risk Frontiers, Macquarie University, Melbourne 2 Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 3 Hazards Warnings and Forecasts Division, Bureau of Meteorology 4 Clinical Psychology, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 5 Population Research Lab, School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 6 Community Safety Branch, Community Safety and Earth Monitoring Division, Geoscience Australia 7 ABC Radio Emergency Broadcasting Abstract The event of severe Tropical Cyclone Marcia is particularly interesting for two reasons. Firstly, it is the most intense cyclone to make landfall so far south on the east coast of Australia during the satellite era. Secondly, it rapidly intensified from a Category 2 to a Category 5 system in 36 hours. While coastal residents of the region, including Yeppoon and Byfield are accustomed to receiving cyclone forecasts and warnings, many were taken by surprise by the intensity of Marcia and the fact that it wasn’t another ‘near miss’. Being situated further inland, the residents of Rockhampton were even more surprised. Given the rapid escalation in intensity of this event, the effective transmission of warnings and how these were used to inform mitigation and community preparedness was particularly important.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockhampton's Resilient Future
    ROCKHAMPTON’S RESILIENT FUTURE DESIGN CHARRETTE Centre for Subtropical Design Queensland University of Technology 2 George Street GPO Box 2434 Brisbane QLD 4001 Australia Rosemary Kennedy Liz Brogden December 2015 Page 1 of 45 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................6 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................................7 Rockhampton ..........................................................................................................................................................................7 Impact ....................................................................................................................................................................................8 The South Rockhampton Flood Levee Proposal .............................................................................................. 9 Objectives .................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Approach and Methodology .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Covers Tropical Cyclone Lam's Landfall in Northern Territory 19 February 2015, by Rob Gutro
    NASA covers Tropical Cyclone Lam's landfall in Northern Territory 19 February 2015, by Rob Gutro Exploration Agency's Global Precipitation Measurement or GPM core observatory satellite passed over Tropical Cyclone Lam at 1256 UTC and captured data on the rainfall rates within the storm. At that time, sustained winds were estimated to be increasing above 55 knots (63 mph). GPM's Microwave Imager (GMI) measured rain falling at a rate of almost 55 mm (2.2 inches) per hour in powerful storms to the northwest of Lam's center. A 3-D view of cyclone Lam's vertical structure was made possible by using GPM's radar (Ku band) data that showed some thunderstorm tops above 7.8 miles (12.6 km). Another instrument took a look at the winds of the storm from its perch in space. The International Space Station's RapidScat instrument captured a look at Tropical Cyclone Lam's winds as it was moving toward landfall. From Feb. 18 at 1:40 UTC to 3:13 UTC RapidScat saw sustained winds to 56 mph/90 kph/25 mps. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer instrument aboard NASA's Aqua satellite captured a stunning picture of the storm as Tropical Cyclone Lam was making landfall over the the center was making landfall on Feb. 19 at 04:40 Northeast Territory of Australia when NASA's Aqua UTC. The center was an eye-like feature obscured satellite saw it on Feb. 19, 2015 at 4:40 UTC. Credit: by clouds as it exited the Arafura Sea and came NASA Goddard MODIS Rapid Response Team ashore near Elcho and Howard Islands in the northeastern part of the Northern Territory.
    [Show full text]